Setting the Record Straight

24
Setting the Record Straight on Our Nation’s Finances

Transcript of Setting the Record Straight

Page 1: Setting the Record Straight

Setting the Record Straight on Our Nation’s Finances

Page 2: Setting the Record Straight

Putting The National Debt Into Perspective

Page 3: Setting the Record Straight

The Public Debt Today = 40% of GDP

National High: 1946 = 108% of GDP

National Low: 1974 = 24% of GDP

Page 4: Setting the Record Straight

Sources: Department of the Treasury and Office of Management and Budget

The National Debt Relative to GDP

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

% o

f GD

P

Gross Federal Debt Debt Held By the Public

Page 5: Setting the Record Straight

We can’t reduce the debt by starving the nation.

Page 6: Setting the Record Straight

Only by investing in our social and physical infrastructure can we achieve sustained economic growth and as a result reduce the debt

Page 7: Setting the Record Straight

But it Can’t All Be Paid for with Debt The U.S. has one of the lowest tax rates of any industrialized country, but in

recent years it has been spending more than countries with similarly low tax rates.

Source: OECD, http://www.oecd.org/document/61/0,3343,en_2649_34573_2483901_1_1_1_1,00.html

Government Revenues and Spending 2007

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

% o

f G

DP

General government total tax and non-tax receipts General government total outlays

Page 8: Setting the Record Straight

Due to huge tax cuts and wartime spending, the U.S. transformed from one of the most fiscally healthy countries to one of the least.

Fiscal Deficits

-14

-12

-10

-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

% o

f G

DP

Sw itzerland Canada Italy Japan France Germany United Kingdom United States Euro area Total OECD

Source: OECD, http://www.oecd.org/document/61/0,3343,en_2649_34573_2483901_1_1_1_1,00.html

Page 9: Setting the Record Straight

What is mistakenly called an “entitlements crisis” is actually a genuine health care crisis.

Rapidly rising medical costs, a large uninsured population, and highly uneven care are all urgent, severe problems.

Page 10: Setting the Record Straight

Social Security’s projected shortfall over the next 75 years is just 0.38 Percent of GDP.0.38 Percent of GDP.

That is not a crisis.

The Social Security System

Page 11: Setting the Record Straight

The Projected Shortfall is Less than the Cost of Extending the Tax Cuts of 2001 and 2003

Source: CBPP, http://www.cbpp.org/3-31-08socsec.htm

0.56% 0.60%

1.95%

0.00%

0.50%

1.00%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%

Social Security Shortfall Cost of Tax Cuts for theTop 1%

Total Cost of Tax Cuts

Pe

rce

nt o

f G

DP

75-Year Social Security Shortfall and Cost of Making the Bush Tax Cuts Permanent

(as share of GDP)

Page 12: Setting the Record Straight

The aging of the population will cause social insurance programs to grow—but nowhere nearly as much as rising health care costs, if left unchecked.

Page 13: Setting the Record Straight

Source: CBO, http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=8877

Effect of Health Care Cost Growth on Future Federal Non-interest Spending

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 2070 2080 2090

% o

f G

DP

Social Security Adding Other Non-healthcare, Non-interest Spending

Total Spending, Baseline (Adding Medicare and Medicaid) Total Spending with Healthcare Cost Stabilization

Page 14: Setting the Record Straight

The United States spends a lot more on health care than other advanced nations.

And we still have 46 million people with no health insurance.

Page 15: Setting the Record Straight

Source: OECD, http://www.oecd.org/document/16/0,3343,en_2649_34631_2085200_1_1_1_1,00.html

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0

Australia

Belgium

Czech Republic

Finland

Germany

Hungary

Ireland

Japan

Luxembourg

Norway

Portugal

Spain

Switzerland

United States

2006 Total expendit. on health % gross domestic product

2006 Medical Spending as a Percent of GDP

Page 16: Setting the Record Straight

Health care spending has also grown much faster in the U.S. than it has in other countries over the past few decades.

Page 17: Setting the Record Straight

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Ireland

Sw eden

Finland

Canada

Japan

Greece

United Kingdom

Luxembourg

Norw ay

Iceland

Germany

Austria

Spain

France

Sw itzerland

Belgium

Portugal

United States

Increase as percent of GDP

Increase in Health Care Cost as a Percent of GDP, 1970 to 2006

Source: OECD, http://www.oecd.org/document/16/0,3343,en_2649_34631_2085200_1_1_1_1,00.html

Page 18: Setting the Record Straight

If trends continue, health care will absorb about half of all spending in the economy within 75 years.

This is not a Medicare or Medicaid problem—it is a system-wide problem.

Page 19: Setting the Record Straight

Source: CBO, http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=8758

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

Year

Medicare Medicaid All Other Health Care

Projected Health Care Spending as Percent of GDP

Page 20: Setting the Record Straight

Private employers and families are suffering from rapidly rising health care costs.

119% increase

Source: Kaiser Family Foundation, http://facts.kff.org/chart.aspx?ch=706

117% increase

$5,791

$12,680

Page 21: Setting the Record Straight

Those who say Medicare spending increases are not sustainable are right. In recent years, the nation’s Medicare bill has been growing by 6-7% annually—far faster than workers’ wages.

The same is true for private health care spending.

Page 22: Setting the Record Straight

Source: CMS, http://www.cms.hhs.gov/NationalHealthExpendData/downloads/tables.pdf

0

5

10

15

20

25

Per

en

rolle c

han

ge (

%)

Medicare Private Insurance

Changes in Spending per Enrollee, Medicare and Private Insurance

Page 23: Setting the Record Straight

Peter Orszag, director of the Office of Management and Budget, says, “The gains from higher health care spending are not clear…Substantial evidence exists that more expensive care does not always mean higher quality care.”

Page 24: Setting the Record Straight

The Relationship Between Quality and Medicare Spending, by State, 2004

Source: Congressional Budget Office, http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/90xx/doc9016/03-03-2008-NABE.pdf