Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

29
Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Understand the strong relation Between Kinematics & in Cylinder Thermo-Fluid Process …..

Transcript of Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Page 1: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

P M V SubbaraoProfessor

Mechanical Engineering Department

Understand the strong relation Between Kinematics & in Cylinder Thermo-Fluid

Process …..

Page 2: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Rod Ratio Relationships

• Short Rod is slower at BDC range and faster at TDC range.• Long Rod is faster at BDC range and slower at TDC range.

Page 3: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Rod Length Changes

• Appears a minimum length change of 21/2% is necessary to perceive a change in thermo-fluid process.

• For R & D purposes it appears a 5% change should be made.

• Perhaps any change should be 2 to 3%--i.e., ignition timing, header tube area, pipe length, cam shaft valve event area, cylinder head flow change, etc.

Page 4: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Rod Ratio

• The ratio between the connecting rod length and the stroke length of a motor greatly affects the way it performs, and how long it lasts.

• This ratio (normally represented by “R”) can be calculated as follows:

• Ratio “R” = Rod Length ÷ Stroke

Page 5: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Creation of Constant Volume Combustion Engine

R

Page 6: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

LONG ROD• Intake Stroke -- will draw harder on cylinder head from 90o

ATDC to BDC.• Compression Stroke -- Piston travels from BDC to 90o

BTDC faster than short rod. • Goes slower from 90o BTDC to TDC--may change ignition

timing requirement versus short rod as piston spends more time at top.

1

sin

cossin60 22

R

LNS p

Page 7: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Long Rod : Ignition

• If flame travel is too fast, detonation could occur. • Does a long rod produce more efficient combustion at

high RPM--measure CO, CO2?

1

sin

cossin60 22

R

LNS p

Page 8: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Long Rod : Power Stroke

1

sin

cossin60 22

R

LNS p

• Power Stroke -- Piston is further down in bore for any given rod/crank pin angle and thus, at any crank angle from 20o to 75o ATDC less force is exerted on the crank pin than a shorter rod.

• The piston will be higher in the bore for any given crank angle from 90o ATDC to BDC and thus cylinder pressure could be higher.

• Long rod will spend less time from 90o ATDC to BDC--allows less time for exhaust to escape on power stroke.

Page 9: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Long Rod : Exhaust Stroke• Exhaust Stroke : The piston will be more in Bore from

BDC to 90o ATDC and thus cylinder pressure could be higher.

• Will force more exhaust out from BDC to 90o BTDC. • Could have more pumping loss! • A long rod will help during peak power.

1

sin

cossin60 22

R

LNS p

Page 10: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

SHORT ROD : Intake Stroke

• Intake Stroke -- Short rod spends less time near TDC and will suck harder on the cylinder head from 10o ATDC to 90o ATDC the early part of the stroke.

• Will not suck as hard from 90o ATDC to BDC as a long rod. • Will require a better cylinder head than long rod to produce same

peak HP. • Will require stronger wrist pins, piston pin bosses, and

connecting rods than a long rod.• Short rod spends more time at the bottom which may reduce

intake charge being pumped back out intake tract as valve closes. • May permit longer intake lobe and/or later intake closing than a

long rod.

Page 11: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

1

sin

cossin60 22

R

LNS p

Short Rod : Compression Stroke & Ignition• Piston moves slower from BDC to 90o BTDC; faster from

90o BTDC to TDC than long rod. • With same ignition timing short rod will create less

cylinder compression for any given crank angle from 90o BTDC to 90o ATDC except at TDC.

• As piston comes down, it will have moved further; thus, from a "time" standpoint, the short rod may be less prone to detonation and may permit higher compression ratios.

Page 12: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Short Rod : Power Stroke• Power Stroke -- Short rod exerts more force to the crank

pin at any crank angle that counts ie.-20o ATDC to 70o ATDC.

• Also side loads on cylinder walls more than long rod. • Will probably be more critical of piston design and

cylinder wall rigidity.

1

sin

cossin60 22

R

LNS p

Page 13: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Short Rod: Exhaust Stroke

• Permits earlier exhaust opening due to cylinder pressure/force being delivered to crank pin sooner with short rod.

• Stroke starts anywhere from 80o to 110o BBDC in race engines due to exhaust valve opening.

• Requires a better exhaust port as it will not pump like a long rod.

• Short rod has less pumping loss ABDC up to 90o BTDC and has more pumping loss from 90o BTDC as it approaches TDC, and may cause more reversion.

Page 14: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Rod Ratio vs. Intake Efficiency• A “R” value of 1.75 is considered “ideal” by some respected

engine builders, if the breathing is optimized for the design. • Except for purpose-built racing engines, most other projects

are compromises where 1.75 may not produce the best results.

• The “R” value can be used as a correction factor to better “match” the intake to the manifold.

• Low “R” numbers (1.45 - 1.75) are produced by short rods in relation to the stroke.

• High “R” numbers (1.75 - 2.1) are produced by long rods in relation to the stroke.

Page 15: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Angle Limitation & Engine Durability

• Sine of Rod Angle = Stroke ÷ (Rod Length * 2)• The angle of the rod at 90° ATDC is a good indication of

how much stress the piston and cylinder wall will be subjected to with a specific rod/stroke selection.

• Angles beyond 17° promote excessive wear at the piston major thrust surface, and piston breakage could be the result.

• Piston selection will be critical for the life expectation of the engine; maximum skirt length below the pin is desired.

Page 16: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Rod Angle

“R” Ratio

Examples Comments

13½° 2.142-1 High speed motor with small ports. Best breathing with small ports

14° 2.067-114½° 1.997-1 Long rods for good breathing with small

ports15° 1.932-1 Long rods to help breathing with small

ports. Responds well to stroke increases (“n” value too large for intake port size)

15½° 1.871-1 Responds well to stroke increases (“n” value too large for intake port size)

16° 1.814-1 Mopar 383/400 Approximate “ideal” compromise between stress & breathing (1.81-1)

16½° 1.760-1 Chevy 327 Good choice for motors with good breathing

http://victorylibrary.com/mopar/rod-tech-c.htm

Page 17: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

17° 1.710-1 Mopar 360 Ford 302, 351W, 460

”Safe” limit for thrust angle. Approaching practical limit for street motors

17½° 1.663-1 Approaching practical limit for street motors

18° 1.618-1 Chevy BB 396/427

Approaching practical limit for street motors. Good power due to large intake port

18½° 1.576-1 Limited street use

19° 1.536-1 Chevy BB 454 Good power due to large intake port

19½° 1.498-1 Not practical for street use due to short pistons

20° 1.462-1 Chevy SB 400 Poor peak power. Longer rods are used in any serious application

Page 18: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Non-viability of Very Long rod is leading to mediocre engine performance .!!!?!?!!

How to achieve a better performance?How to promote low quality renewable fuels?

How to achieve better Piston Motion at both BDC & TDC ????!!??!

Page 19: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Dwell Piston Mechanism

Page 20: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Dwell Piston Mechanism

Page 21: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Dwell Piston Mechanism

Page 22: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Piston path for Dwell four stroke cycle

Page 23: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Comparison of standard and Dwell four stroke Cycles

Page 24: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Longer Dwell at TDC

• The benefits of a longer dwell at TDC are myriad. • When the piston is stationary, the combustion region stays small

longer in the crankshaft's arc of rotation, containing the flame as it tries to expand.

• Meanwhile, the cylinder pressure is rising, because the mechanically locked piston cannot move until the angle of the crankshaft allows it to.

• During this time, not only will the cylinder pressure rise, but by keeping the combustion region small longer in the crankshaft's rotation, the odds of abnormal combustion occurring are reduced.

• The small, tight and confined flame does not allow as readily for a rogue ignition event to occur, quenching the possibility of detonation.

Page 25: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

• Abnormal combustion can be qualified as either pre-ignition or post-ignition and is identified as anything other than the normal singular flame front initiated by the arcing of the spark plug.

• The longer the piston dwell period at TDC, the more powerful and octane-tolerant the engine becomes.

Page 26: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Longer Dwell at TDC

• Holding the piston at maximum volume (BDC piston dwell) provides additional time for the cylinder to fully charge before closing the intake valves.

• At the end of power stroke longer dwell at BDC will reduce the pressure during exhaust stroke and minimize pumping losses.

Page 27: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Instantaneous Velocity of Dwell Piston

ddSN

dtdSS p

602

22 sin

cossinsin

ael

aeaaddS

Page 28: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

PV diagram due piston dwell in TDC and BDC

Page 29: Selection of Rod Ratio for I.C. Engines

Comparison of standard and Dwell four strokecycles in PV diagram