Section D: Teaching and Student Related Policies 5 D50 ...

Section D: Teaching and Student Related Policies 5 ............................................................. D50: Assignment of Credit Hours 5 .......................................................................................... D90: Posthumous Degrees 7 ..................................................................................................... D100: Dishonesty in Academic Matters 11 ............................................................................. D170: Student Attendance 13 ................................................................................................... D175: Undergraduate Student Conduct and Grievance Procedures 19 ............................. D176: Graduate and Professional Student Conduct and Grievance Procedures 39 ......... Information: D25: Academic Renewal Policy 61 ..................................................................... Information: D30: Allowable Maximum Semester Load 63 .................................................. Information: D40: Audited Courses 65 .................................................................................... Information: D60: Class Lists 67 ............................................................................................... Information: D75: Classroom Conduct 69 ............................................................................... Information: D105: Examination to Establish or Validate Credit 71 ................................... Information: D120: Resolving Grade Grievence Involving Failure to Accommodate

73 ............................................................................................................................................ Information: D145: Instructor Drops 75 ..................................................................................

D50: Assignment of Credit Hours

https://handbook.unm.edu/d50/ 5

D50: Assignment of Credit Hours

Approved by: Faculty SenateEffective: April 24, 2018Responsible FS Committee: Faculty Senate Policy Committee Office Responsible forAdministration: Office of the Registrar

Revisions to the Policy Rationale, Policy Statement, and Applicability sections of this documentmust be approved by the full Faculty Senate.

Policy RationaleThe University of New Mexico (UNM) evaluates a student's progress toward a degree in terms ofsemester credit hours. Undergraduate, graduate, and professional degree requirements areapproved by University faculty in accordance with Faculty Handbook Policy A50 "The Faculty'sRole in the University's Academic Mission" and are listed in the applicable course catalog.

Policy StatementUNM’s assignment and award of credit hours conforms to commonly accepted practices inhigher education in accordance with federal regulations 34 CFR 602.24(f).

The minimum requirements for assigning one (1) semester credit hour consists of one (1) 50-minute period of classroom or direct faculty instruction and a minimum of two (2) hours of out-of-class student work each week of the semester; or at least an equivalent amount of work asestablished by the degree granting college.

ApplicabilityAll academic UNM units, including the Health Sciences Center and Branch Community Colleges.

Revisions to the remaining sections of this document may be amended with the approval ofthe Faculty Senate Policy and Operations Committee in consultation with the responsibleFaculty Senate Committee listed in Policy Heading.

DefinitionsClassroom or direct faculty instruction. This consists of direct instruction or guidedinteraction, which includes but is not limited to, in person or online lectures, seminars,discussions, art and design studios, supervised group work, and examinations.

Faculty Handbook

6 PDF built December 29, 2021

Equivalent amount of work can include, but is not limited to, activities such as laboratorywork, internships, practica, studio work, ensemble music, and other academic work.

Out-of-class student work. This consists of time students spend outside of classroom or directfaculty instruction to fulfill course objectives, which includes but is not limited to, readingassignments, working out problems, preparing for exams, online and face-to-face group work,writing paper(s), and working on project(s).

Who should read this policyFaculty membersAcademic administrators

Related DocumentsRegents' Policy Manual

Policy 5.1 "The Faculty's Role in the University's Academic Mission"(https://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-5/5-1.html)

Faculty Handbook

A50: The Faculty's Role in the University's Academic Mission (/a50/)

UNM Course Catalogs (https://catalog.unm.edu/)

ContactsDirect any questions about this policy to Office of the Registrar.

ProceduresFaculty members including part-time instructors and teaching, research, and graduate assistantsacting in a faculty capacity are responsible for ensuring that the amount of contact time andindependent work time expected of students meets the minimum requirements listed above inthe Policy Statement section. Faculty will include the required hours of work on the course syllabieach semester.

HistoryApril 24, 2018 Approved by Faculty Senate

https://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-5/5-1.html


https://handbook.unm.edu/a50/

https://handbook.unm.edu/a50/

https://catalog.unm.edu/

https://catalog.unm.edu/

D90: Posthumous Degrees



Approved by: Faculty SenateEffective: November 28, 2017Responsible FS Committee: Faculty Senate Policy CommitteeOffice Responsible for Administration: Office of the Provost


Policy RationaleThe University of New Mexico (UNM) recognizes that an academic degree is a matter oflegitimate pride in achievement not only for students themselves but also for the familymembers and friends who provide students with vitally important support and encouragementduring the course of their studies. UNM also recognizes that not only the degree, but alsosignificant progress in an academic program is, under certain circumstances, an achievementwhich warrants special recognition. Accordingly, UNM may grant degrees posthumously, inmemoriam, or in extraordinary circumstances. A degree of the appropriate type and level may tobe bestowed upon a student who meets required criteria with appropriate approvals.

Policy StatementRequests for granting degrees posthumously, in memoriam, or due to an extraordinarycircumstance may be initiated by the student, student's family, the faculty of the departmentand/or college/school, or a UNM administrator. The request should be submitted to the Office ofUniversity Secretary who will facilitate review and approval by the appropriate faculty,college/school official(s), Faculty Senate (FS) Committees, and the Faculty Senate. Awarding ofgraduate and professional degrees requires approval of the Departmental faculty and the FacultySenate Graduate and Professional Committee. Approved degree requests may be awarded underthe following circumstances:

1. Posthumous

If approved by all levels as specified herein, UNM may grant posthumous degrees to a studentwho dies before he or she is able to complete his/her program. The student must be in degreestatus and either currently enrolled or enrolled in the academic year previous to his/her death.Normally, the student should have completed half of the credits required for the degree. Thedegree will be noted as "posthumous" on both the diploma and the transcript.

2. In Memoriam

Faculty Handbook


If approved by all levels as specified herein, UNM may award a degree in memoriam to a studentwho was in good standing at UNM at the time of his or her death and who does not meet therequirements necessary to be awarded a posthumous degree. The degree will be noted as "inmemoriam" on both the diploma and the transcript.

3. Extraordinary Circumstances

If approved by all levels as specified herein, UNM may grant a degree when extraordinarycircumstances beyond the student’s control prevent the student from completion of his or heracademic program. Normally, the student should have completed half of the credits required forthe degree. If departmental faculty vote to waive remaining degree requirements, the studentwill be awarded a degree without special notation on the diploma and transcript. If degreerequirements are not waived, a special notation will be added to the diploma and transcript.

a. Terminally Ill

If approved by all levels as specified herein, special consideration may be given for a terminallyill student as determined by a qualified healthcare provider. Before the student dies, the studentand family may be informed of the college’s/school’s and UNM’s decision to award the degree.The dean, department chair, or other appropriate representatives may present the degree in aprivate gathering as a special gesture to the family and student. The family will receive thediploma as soon as it is produced.

b. Rare and Unusual Situations

If approved by all levels as specified herein, degrees may be awarded to a student or formerstudent due to extraordinary circumstances. These situations are extremely rare and unusual,and the required criteria will be determined on a case-by-case basis by UNM. A request forconsideration of granting a degree for an extraordinary circumstance, must describe theexceptional situation(s) that impacted the student’s ability to the complete the academicprogram.

ApplicabilityAll academic UNM units, including the Health Sciences Center and Branch Community Colleges.




DefinitionsNo specific definitions are required for the Policy.

Who should read this policyStudentsFaculty membersStaff in Office of the Dean of StudentsAcademic administrators

Related DocumentsRegents Policy Manual

RPM 1.1 “Responsibilities of the Board of Regents” (https://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-1/1-1.html)

ContactsDirect any questions about this policy to Office of the University Secretary.

ProceduresApproval of these degrees by the Board of Regents will follow established degree approvalprocesses.

HistoryFebruary 27, 2007--Approved by the Faculty Senate



Faculty Handbook


D100: Dishonesty in Academic Matters


D100: Dishonesty in Academic MattersPolicy

Dishonesty on the part of a student in connection with either course material or student recordsis a serious matter involving the possibility of disciplinary action. Since the members of thefaculty have a direct responsibility in the enforcement of the standards involved, the followingformal statement was prepared, incorporating the current regulation and the procedures forimplementing it.

1. The following statement appears among the scholastic regulations listed in the UNMCatalogand Pathfinder:

"Each student is expected to maintain the highest standards of honesty and integrity inacademic and professional matters. The University reserves the right to take disciplinary action,up to and including dismissal, against any student who is found guilty of academic dishonesty orotherwise fails to meet these standards.

Academic dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, dishonesty in quizzes, tests, or assignments;claiming credit for work not done or done by others; and nondisclosure or misrepresentation infilling out applications or other university records."

2. When a violation of the regulation occurs in connection with a course, seminar, or any otheracademic activity under the direction of a faculty member, that faculty member is authorized totake whatever action is deemed appropriate, but no penalty in excess of an "F" in the course andthe involuntary withdrawal of the student from the class may be imposed. Whenever thispenalty is imposed; the instructor may report the case in full detail in writing to the Dean ofStudents, who may impose additional sanctions or refer the matter to the Student ConductCommittee for a determination of whether additional sanctions are warranted.

It is also important to point out that before a faculty member takes action on any allegedviolation of this rule, the instructor should be certain that there is substantial evidence tosupport the charge.

3. When academic dishonesty occurs in connection with any test or examination not connectedwith a course, but administered by an officer of the University or in connection with any non-disclosure or misrepresentation in filling out applications or other University records, the personwho observes or discovers the violation shall transmit in writing to the Dean of Students astatement describing the occurrence. A copy shall be sent to the student. The Dean of Studentsshall determine the sanction following procedures set forth in section 3.4 of the StudentGrievance Procedure.

4. Action taken by the Student Conduct Committee shall be completed within the time limits and

Faculty Handbook


extension provisions outlined in section 9.1 of the Student Grievance Procedure. Copies of thefinal decision will be sent to the faculty member's chairperson, dean and to the dean of thestudent's college if different.

The procedure described above with reference to the Student Conduct Committee removes noneof the instructor's authority heretofore practiced in such matters, but rather strengthens andgives uniformity to action taken by making use of an appropriate committee upon which bothfaculty and students serve.

On the whole, experience shows that student committee members deal as rigorously withdishonesty as do administrative officials, individual faculty members, or faculty committees.More important than consistency or rigorousness of punishment, however, is the simpleconsideration that student government, student self-reliance, and student responsibility developfurther and more firmly when student representatives actually take a role in dealing with studentbehavior.

In order to be as fair as possible to students, it is recommended that faculty members teachinglower division courses inform the class, at the beginning of each course, as to their policy andthe University policy with reference to dishonest academic practices. Students thus informed willthereafter have no basis for pleading ignorance of regulations.

Refer also to Information (/information/) and D175: Undergraduate Student Conduct and GrievanceProcedures (/d175/), Faculty Handbook.

https://handbook.unm.edu/information/

https://handbook.unm.edu/information/

https://handbook.unm.edu/d175/



D170: Student Attendance



Approved by: Faculty SenateEffective: April 28, 2020Responsible Faculty Committee: Faculty Senate Policy CommitteeOffice Responsible for Administration: Dean of Students


Policy RationaleClass attendance is critical for the overall success of the students at the University of NewMexico (UNM). However, there are situations when a student may qualify for an excusedabsence and be provided with the opportunity to make up assignments or examinations missed.This Policy describes absences that normally qualify as excused absences and provides theprocess for reporting such absences and completing missed assignments and exams.

Policy StatementThe absences listed below are normally excused unless the instructor determines that theabsences are excessive or adversely impact learning, or fundamentally alter the course orprogram. An excused absence does not relieve the student of responsibility for missedassignments, exams, etc. The student is to take the initiative in arranging with the instructor(s)to make up missed work, and it is expected that the instructor will cooperate with the student inreasonable arrangements in this regard. However, the student must recognize that some classesor class-work (quizzes, seminars, labs, etc.) cannot be made up. Classes or class-work thatcannot be made up will be identified in the syllabus and the nature of any documentationrequired will be described.

To ensure equitable treatment of students, when there is concern on the type of absences thatshould be excused and reasonable accommodations for such absences, instructors areencouraged to consult with their chair or dean, or the Dean of Students or equivalent positiondesignated for graduate or professional schools or colleges and branch community colleges.

1. UNM Official Absences

Instructors should excuse absences due to UNM official absences which result when a student isrequired to represent UNM at University functions or related extracurricular activities such asprofessional meetings, academic competitions, field trips, research activities, NCAA athleticcompetitions, or other similar activities. UNM Official Absence(s) will be determined by a college

Faculty Handbook


dean or the Provost, or designee.

2. Legally or Administratively Compelled Absence(s)

Instructors must excuse absences due to a legally or administratively compelled absence whena student is required to participate in legal proceedings or administrative procedures. Thisincludes mandatory admissions interviews for professional or graduate school.

3. Military Obligations

Instructors must excuse absences due to military obligations for students serving in the military,military reserves, or National Guard of the United States who are required to miss class due tomilitary obligations. If the military obligations require withdrawal, the instructor should refer tothe UNM Catalog or contact the Dean of Students Office or equivalent position for graduate orprofessional schools or colleges and branch community colleges for procedures pertaining towithdrawal and re-enrollment of military personnel.

4. Illness, Accident, or Death in the Family

Instructors should excuse unexpected absences due to personal or family illness, accident, ordeath in the family. Instructors may require students who are ill for more than fifteen percent(15%) of required contact hours to obtain official notification from the Dean of Students office orequivalent position designated for graduate or professional schools or colleges and branchcommunity colleges.

5. Disability

Instructors must excuse absences due to disabilities where reasonable. Such requests must beprocessed in accordance with University Administrative Policy 2310(http://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/2000/2310.html) “Academic Adjustments for Students with Disabilities.”For a short-term disability due to an illness or injury not covered by the Americans withDisabilities Act (ADA), students should contact the Dean of Students Office or equivalent positiondesignated for graduate or professional schools or colleges and branch community colleges forassistance. These offices can also assist instructors with verification of the short-term disability.

5.1. Attendance Accommodation for Students with Disabilities

Attendance during scheduled class times is a necessary part of the learning process. TheAccessibility Resource Center (ARC) may recommend flexibility in attendance for some students.This accommodation should be provided unless the accommodation fundamentally alters thecourse or program. The following six (6) factors should be used in considering if attendance is anessential element of the course and the flexibility in attendance recommended is not considereda reasonable accommodation:

http://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/2000/2310.html




Are there classroom interactions between the instructor and the students and among the2.students?Do student contributions constitute a significant component of the learning process?4.Does the functional nature of the course rely on student participation as an essential6.method for learning?To what degree does a student's failure to attend constitute a significant loss to the8.educational experience of the other students in the course?What do the course description and syllabus say?10.What are the classroom practices and policies regarding attendance?12.

If an instructor disagrees with the determination by ARC, the instructor should follow theprocedures listed in University Administrative Policy 2310 “Academic Adjustments for Studentswith Disabilities.”

6. Pregnancy

In accordance with Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972, instructors must treatpregnancy related absences as excused as long as deemed medically necessary by thestudent’s healthcare provider. If the length of absence is more than fifteen percent (15%) ofrequired contact hours, the student may be required to obtain official notification from the Deanof Students Office or equivalent position designated for graduate or professional schools orcolleges and branch community colleges. If instructors have any questions, they may contactthe UNM Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO).

7. Religious Observances

In recognition of UNM’s diverse student population, instructors are encouraged to scheduleimportant class events to minimize conflict with major religious observances. Students whorequest that an absence be excused for religious reasons must be granted reasonableaccommodations. Instructors should be sensitive to the difficulty some students may haveanticipating all religious obligations. Absences due to religious accommodations should berequested in accordance with Policy C260 (/c260/) “Religious Accommodations.”

8. Request for Reconsideration

If a request for an excused absence and/or reasonable accommodation is denied by aninstructor, the student may seek informal resolution of the matter by submitting a request forreconsideration to the department chair, program/course director, or equivalent position ordesignee. Given the need for timeliness of the issue, the student’s request for reconsiderationshould be addressed as expeditiously as possible. This does not preclude the student fromaddressing the matter further in accordance with Policies D175 (/d175/) “Undergraduate StudentConduct and Grievance Policy” or D176 (/d176/) “Graduate and Professional Student Conduct andGrievance Policy.”

https://handbook.unm.edu/c260/






Faculty Handbook


ApplicabilityThe Policy Statement above is applicable to all academic UNM units, including the HealthSciences Center and Branch Community Colleges.


DefinitionsThere are no additional definitions for this Policy.

Who should read this policy• Instructors• Staff in the Office of the Dean of Students• Staff at Student Health and Counseling (SHAC)• Administrative staff responsible for student events

Related DocumentsFaculty HandbookPolicy C220 (/c220/) “Holidays”Policy C260 (/c260/) “Religious Accommodations”Policy D175 (/d175/) “Undergraduate Student Conduct and Grievance Policy”Policy D176 (/d176/) “Graduate and Professional Student Conduct and Grievance Policy.”

The Pathfinder (http://pathfinder.unm.edu/)—UNM Student Handbook. “Student Grievance Procedures”

ContactsDirect any questions about this policy to Dean of Students Office or equivalent positiondesignated for graduate or professional schools or colleges and branch community colleges.

ProceduresThe following procedures pertain to undergraduate students at the Albuquerque campus. Branchcommunity college, graduate, and professional students are subject to the above PolicyStatement but should follow the attendance procedures issued by their respective school orcollege, when available.









http://pathfinder.unm.edu/

http://pathfinder.unm.edu/



Absences due to the situations described in the Policy Statement above are to be reported bythe student to the instructor(s) and to the Dean of Students Office in accordance with theprocedures listed herein. If the student is unable to contact the instructor(s), the student shouldleave a message at the instructor’s department.

1. Course Attendance Expectations

Students are expected to fulfill all course requirements including attendance if specified. Courseinstructors are responsible for setting attendance policies for their individual courses exceptwhere academic units, required by special circumstances such as accreditation standards,establish unit-wide policies through normal faculty governance procedures. Instructors shouldinform students of their expectations for attendance and participation on the first day of classand are encouraged to include this Policy in the course syllabus. Instructors may also requirestudents to notify them of anticipated absences at the beginning of the semester and mayrequire reasonable verification of the reason for an excused absence such as a doctor’s note,hospital billing, military orders, or death notices.

Instructors may drop students with excessive absences with a grade of W. Instructors may alsoassign a failing grade of "F" at the end of the semester for excess unexcused absences butshould inform students if they will be dropped or penalized for unexcused absences. Academicunits may also reserve the right to cancel a course reservation for a student who does notattend the first class meeting of the semester, although notification should be made before thestudent is dropped and reasonable accommodations should be made for excused absences.Students should not assume that nonattendance results in being dropped from class. It is thestudent’s responsibility to initiate drops or complete withdrawals within published deadlinesutilizing the appropriate process.

2. Verification of Absence

Verification (such as doctor’s note, hospital billing, military orders, death notices, etc.) of astudent's report of absence will be provided by the student if requested by the instructor or theDean of Students Office. Student Athletes shall submit documentation to their instructors.

3. Short-Term Absence (Less than or Equal to 15% of Required Contact Hours)

The Dean of Students Office will encourage the student to speak directly with the instructor towork out absences that are less than or equal to fifteen percent (15%) of required contact hours.When requested by an instructor, the Dean of Students Office may assist with verification ofabsences that are less than or equal to fifteen percent (15%) of required contact hours on acase-by-case basis.

4. Extended Absence (More than 15% of Required Contact Hours)

The Dean of Students Office, as a service to instructors and students, will send absence

Faculty Handbook


notifications to the respective instructor should an absence be more than fifteen percent (15%)of required contact hours. This service will only be utilized when an absence is for afamily/student medical issue, death of a family member, military leave, or a UNM sponsoredactivity. The absence notification process is only meant as a notification and not meant toexcuse the absence. Excusing an absence is entirely up to the instructor of the course.Verification of extended absences is recommended (such as a doctor's note, hospital billing, etc.)

5. Exceptions

It should be noted that written medical excuses for class absence will not be issued routinely byStudent Health and Counseling (SHAC) except in the case of physical education classes, whereparticipation would be detrimental to the student's condition. Where confirmation of a student'sattendance at SHAC is required by an instructor, this will be furnished on direct enquiry, withoutrevealing the medical details necessitating such attendance. If it appears that a student will beabsent for more than 15% of required contact hours, the Dean of Students Office will be notified.

HistoryApril 28, 2020 -- Amended by Faculty Senate

D175: Undergraduate Student Conduct and Grievance Procedures


D175: Undergraduate Student Conductand Grievance Procedures

Approved by: Faculty Senate and UNM PresidentEffective: August 14, 2020Responsible Committee: Faculty Senate Policy Committee Office Responsible for Administration:Dean of Students

Revisions to the Policy Rationale, Policy Statement, and Applicability sections of this documentmust be approved by the full Faculty Senate and the UNM President after consultation with theASUNM President and the Dean of Students.

Policy RationaleThe University of New Mexico (UNM) is committed to academic excellence and student success.This Policy provides procedures for resolution of disputes of an academic nature betweenundergraduate students and UNM faculty, allegations of discrimination or sexual harassment byundergraduate students, and allegations of other kinds of undergraduate student misconduct, aswell as procedures for handling undergraduate student disciplinary matters.

Policy StatementWhenever possible, it is important to take a supportive problem-solving approach to resolvingacademic disputes. However, UNM may take disciplinary action against an undergraduatestudent for a violation of the Student Code of Conduct or other UNM policy when the offenseoccurs on UNM premises or at a UNM-sponsored event, or when the violation occurs off campusand failure to take disciplinary action is likely to disrupt the academic process or other campusfunctions or endanger the health, safety or welfare of the UNM community or any individualstudent or employee.

1. Matters Covered Under this Policy

The following types of disputes or disciplinary matters are covered by this Policy and handled inaccordance with the procedures described in the Procedures Section of this document. Anyquestions about these procedures should be directed to the Office of the Dean of Students. TheDean of Students may create additional processes and procedures that are in accordance withthis Policy to aid the Dean of Students in administration of this Policy.

1.1. Academic record disputes involving undergraduate students seeking retroactivewithdrawal, enrollment, or disenrollment or for other academic record changes.

Faculty Handbook


1.2. Academic disputes arising within the academic process, whereby an undergraduatestudent believes that academic progress has been evaluated in an unfair or improper manner bya faculty member or academic program/department in connection with the academic process.For example, it applies to disputes over assignment of grades, decisions about program ordegree requirements or eligibility, or claims that course requirements are unfair.

1.3. Allegations of Academic Dishonesty arising from violation of academic dishonesty rulesas defined in the Definitions Section herein.

1.4. Allegations of Discrimination and/or Sexual Harassment

UNM urges any individual who has experienced discrimination, sexual harassment, sexualmisconduct and/or sexual violence, or has knowledge about such an incident, to report theincident to the Title IX Coordinator at Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO) within 24 hours, or assoon as reasonably practicable, by calling (505) 277-5251 or by email at [email protected] and/or anonymous reports can be made (refer to Procedures Article 4 herein forreporting options). Complaints can also be made to the UNM Ethicspoint Hotline1-888-899-6092. The UNM OEO is tasked with investigating allegations of discrimination, sexualharassment, sexual misconduct and/or sexual violence. If UNM, as represented by thedesignated Hearing Officer, determines that an undergraduate student has violated UNM’s anti-discrimination or sexual harassment policies, disciplinary proceedings shall be handled underthe Procedures set forth in Article 4 herein.

1.5. Allegations of Student Misconduct NOT Involving Discrimination or SexualHarassment arising from violation of the Student Code of Conduct or other UNM policy.

2. Matters that may also be Covered under other UNM Policies

2.1. Health Sciences Center (HSC) Students

Additional policies and procedures listed in section 6.3.2 herein apply to HSC undergraduatestudents.

2.2. Visitors to the UNM campus

Visitors to the UNM campus are subject to the Vistor Code of Conduct(https://pathfinder.unm.edu/campus-policies/visitor-code-of-conduct.html).

3. Matters Not Covered Under This Policy

3.1. Disputes involving access to information in an undergraduate student's educational recordsshall follow procedures set forth in the UNM Student Records Policy(https://pathfinder.unm.edu/campus-policies/student-records-policy.html), published in the student handbook, thePathfinder.

https://pathfinder.unm.edu/campus-policies/visitor-code-of-conduct.html

https://pathfinder.unm.edu/campus-policies/visitor-code-of-conduct.html

https://pathfinder.unm.edu/campus-policies/student-records-policy.html

https://pathfinder.unm.edu/campus-policies/student-records-policy.html



3.2. Grievances arising out of an undergraduate student’s status as a UNM employee hiredthrough the Student Employment Office shall follow procedures set forth in the UNM StudentEmployee Grievance Procedure (https://pathfinder.unm.edu/campus-policies/student-employee-grievance-procedure.html),published in the student handbook, the Pathfinder.

3.3. Disputes involving matters occurring in the residence halls shall follow the procedures setforth in the Residence Hall Handbook in addition to this Policy.

3.4. Any undergraduate student grievances concerning decisions made by UNM personnel,outside the academic process, for which specific procedures are not established, shall beresolved between the undergraduate student and the office or department involved. If noresolution is reached, the parties may appeal to the appropriate dean or director and then to theappropriate vice president, Provost, or Executive Vice President (EVP) for Health Sciences.Appeals should be filed in writing within ten (10) working days of the decision.

3.5. Resolution of disputes of an academic nature initiated by graduate or professional studentsshall follow Faculty Handbook Policy D176 (/d176/) “Graduate and Professional Student Conductand Grievance Policy.”

ApplicabilityAll UNM academic faculty, staff, and administrators.


DefinitionsAcademic Dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, plagiarism (including self-plagiarism),dishonesty in quizzes, tests, or assignments; claiming credit for work not done or done byothers; hindering the academic work of other students; misrepresenting academic orprofessional qualifications within or outside UNM; and nondisclosure or misrepresentation infilling out applications or other University records.

Complaint refers to:

• request for formal resolution of academic matters per Section 2.3. herein;• allegations of prohibited discrimination as defined herein filed with UNM's Office of EqualOpportunity; or• allegations of misconduct referred to the Dean of Students per Section 5.2. herein

Discrimination includes all forms of unlawful discrimination based on an individual's or group's

https://pathfinder.unm.edu/campus-policies/student-employee-grievance-procedure.html





Faculty Handbook


protected class(es), including unlawful discrimination based on age (40 and over), ancestry,color, ethnicity, gender identity, gender/sex, genetic information, medical condition, nationalorigin, physical or mental disability, pregnancy, race, religion, sexual orientation, spousalaffiliation, veteran status and any other protected class as described in University AdministrativePolicy #2720 (https://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/2000/2720.html) #2740(http://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/2000/2740.html). Sexual harassment is a form of gender discriminationthat includes sexual violence, which is considered a severe form of sexual harassment. Forpurposes of this Policy, "discrimination" also includes retaliation for having made allegations ofdiscrimination, having participated in an investigation into allegations of discrimination, orotherwise having engaged in opposition to unlawful discrimination. Retaliation is explicitlyprohibited under University Administrative Policies #2200 (http://policy.unm.edu/university-

policies/2000/2220.html), 2720 (http://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/2000/2720.html), and 2740(http://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/2000/2740.html).

Misconduct is any activity performed by a UNM undergraduate student that violates stateand/or federal laws or regulations, local ordinances, or UNM policy.

Office of Equal Opportunity or OEO is the UNM office that processes allegations ofdiscrimination or sexual harassment as defined herein, including but not limited to investigatingsuch allegations and making determinations as to whether or not UNM's policies prohibitingdiscrimination or sexual harassment have been violated. OEO does not issue sanctions forviolations of policy.

Undergraduate Students include both full-time and part-time students pursuingundergraduate studies, degree and non-degree, including credit and noncredit courses. Studentstatus continues for the entire period of enrollment, including UNM holidays, class breaks andsummer session, if the student is enrolled for the preceding spring and following fall academicterms.

Working Days refer to UNM traditional work days defined by UNM Human Resources as five (5)work days Monday through Friday ending at 5:00 PM. Working days do not include official UNMholidays listed in UAP Policy 3405 (https://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/3000/3405.html) “Holidays.”

Who should read this policy• Undergraduate students including branch community college students• Faculty members• Staff in the Office of the Dean of Students• Staff in the Office of Equal Opportunity• Staff at Student Health and Counseling (SHAC)• Administrative staff responsible for undergraduate student events

https://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/2000/2720.html















Related DocumentsRegents Policy ManualRPM 1.5 (https://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-1/1-5.html/) “Appeals to the Board of Regents”RPM 4.2 (https://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-4/4-2.html) “Student Code of Conduct”RPM 4.3 (https://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-4/4-3.html) “Student Grievances”RPM 4.4 (https://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-4/4-4.html) “Student Records”RPM 4.8 (https://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-4/4-8.html) “Academic Dishonesty”Faculty HandbookD75 (/d75/) “Classroom Conduct”D100 (/d100/) “Dishonesty in Academic Matters”D176 (/d176/) “Graduate and Professional Student Conduct and Grievance Policy”University Administrative Policies Manual2200 (https://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/2000/2200.html) “Reporting Suspected Misconduct andWhistleblower Protection from Retaliation”2720 (https://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/2000/2720.html) “Prohibited Discrimination and Equal Opportunity”2740 (https://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/2000/2740.html) “Sexual Misconduct”3405 (https://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/3000/3405.html) “Holidays”

The Pathfinder—UNM Student Handbook.Office of Equal Opportunity Discrimination Grievance Procedures(https://oeo.unm.edu/forms/pdf/-new_claims.pdf)

ContactsDirect any questions about this Policy to Dean of Students Office.

ProceduresReasonable deviations from these procedures by UNM will not invalidate a decision orproceeding unless significant prejudice results. At branch community colleges, the role of Deanof Students will be performed by the applicable position designated at each branch communitycollege.

Article 1. Academic Record Disputes

1.1. Scope This article sets forth the procedures which should be followed by an undergraduatestudent seeking retroactive withdrawal, enrollment, or disenrollment, or for other academicrecord changes involving exceptions to the rules governing registration and academic recordswhich are set forth in the UNM Catalog. It does not cover disputes involving academic judgment(e.g. grades).

1.2. Petitions

https://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-1/1-5.html/
























https://oeo.unm.edu/forms/pdf/-new_claims.pdf


Faculty Handbook


1.2.1. An undergraduate student seeking a change in the student’s academic record within thescope of this article shall submit a petition to the Registrar’s Office for consideration by theFaculty Senate Admissions and Registration Committee. The petition shall:

Include a statement of the nature of the request including why the student feels it should2.be granted.Specify the semester involved and the subject/department code, course and section4.numbers.Specify the student's name, UNM I.D. number, mailing address, email address and6.telephone number.Include documentation of extenuating circumstances, such as medical, family, or8.employment needs.Be typed and signed. 6. Optionally, include supporting statements from involved faculty10.and academic units.

1.2.2. Upon receipt of the petition, the Registrar’s Office shall forward a copy to the instructor ofthe course. The instructor shall make any response within fifteen (15) working days of receipt. Ifthe instructor has not responded within fifteen (15) working days, the Faculty Senate Admissionsand Registration Committee (“Committee”) shall proceed to consider the petition without theinstructor's response.

1.3. Appeal

At the next regular meeting after receipt of the instructor's response (or lack of response), theFaculty Senate Admissions and Registration Committee shall take action on the petition. If theCommittee denies the petition, it shall issue a brief statement giving the reasons for the denial.Absent any new information from the undergraduate student, the Committee’s decision shall befinal. If the undergraduate student has new information that was unavailable at the time theCommittee made the decision and that may affect the Committee’s decision of denying thepetition, the undergraduate student may request reconsideration from the Committee. TheCommittee’s decision upon reconsideration is final for UNM.

Article 2. Academic Disputes

2.1. Scope

This article sets forth the procedures which should be followed by an undergraduate student whobelieves that academic progress has been evaluated in an unfair or improper manner by afaculty member or academic program/department. For example, it applies to disputes overassignment of grades, decisions about program or degree requirements or eligibility, or claimsthat course requirements are unfair.

2.2. Informal Resolution



2.2.1. The undergraduate student should first try to resolve the grievance informally bydiscussing the grievance with the faculty member as soon as reasonably possible after theundergraduate student becomes or should have become aware of the matter. If theundergraduate student and faculty member cannot reach agreement, the undergraduatestudent should discuss the grievance with the chairperson or supervisor of the department ordivision. If the grievance is still not resolved, the undergraduate student should discuss thegrievance with the appropriate dean. When the dispute arises from a particular course, theappropriate dean is the dean of the college offering the course.

2.2.2. In these informal discussions, the chairperson, supervisor, or dean is encouraged tomediate the dispute actively. In particular, the chairperson, supervisor, or dean should talk toboth the undergraduate student and the faculty member, separately or together, and shouldexamine any relevant evidence, including any written statements the parties wish to submit.

2.2.3. These informal discussions shall be completed within twenty (20) working days after theundergraduate student initially raised the issue with the faculty member.

2.3. Formal Resolution of Academic Matters

If the informal discussions do not resolve the grievance, the undergraduate student may bring aformal complaint using the procedures set forth in the following sections. During the formalresolution process, the chairperson and/or dean cannot overrule a faculty member's academicjudgment. This formal complaint process shall begin within ten (10) working days followingcompletion of the informal discussions.

2.3.1. The undergraduate student shall make a written complaint to the appropriate dean withinten (10) working days following completion of the informal discussions.

2.3.2. The complaint shall describe the grievance, including a statement of what happened, andthe undergraduate student's reasons for challenging the action or decision. The complaint shallalso describe the undergraduate student's attempts to resolve the grievance informally. Theundergraduate student may attach copies of any relevant documents. The undergraduatestudent shall send a copy of the complaint to the faculty member and the faculty member’schairperson. The faculty member shall have five (5) working days from the receipt of thecomplaint to respond in writing to the dean. A copy of the faculty member’s response shall beprovided to the undergraduate student, consistent with the federal Family Educational Rightsand Privacy Act (FERPA).

2.3.3. In making a determination on the formal complaint, the dean shall receive and reviewany written evidence or statements submitted by the parties, and shall provide both parties theopportunity to review and respond to all evidence. The dean shall interview each party and mayinterview other persons with relevant information. At the dean’s discretion, the dean may decideto hold an informal hearing involving both parties and any witnesses. Where the disputeprimarily concerns factual questions, rather than matters of academic judgment, the dean

Faculty Handbook


should normally hold such a hearing. If a hearing is to be held, the dean will give the parties noless than five (5) working days notice. The undergraduate student and/or faculty member shallbe allowed to bring an advisor to the hearing, but legal counsel shall not be permitted.Crossexamination of witnesses shall be permitted, but the dean may require that questions bedirected through the dean.

2.3.4. At the dean’s discretion, the dean may convene an advisory committee to hold a hearingor otherwise help the dean evaluate the dispute. For this purpose, the dean may utilize astanding committee appointed within the dean's college.

2.3.5. The dean shall issue a written decision explaining the dean’s findings, conclusions, andreasons for the decision. The decision shall be sent to each party, and to the faculty member’schair. The decision shall be made within twenty (20) working days after the complaint is filed,unless an informal hearing is held, in which case the decision shall be made within thirty (30)working days. (This period may be extended to allow for UNM holidays or other periods whenUNM is not in session.) The chairperson or dean cannot overrule a faculty member’s academicjudgment.

2.4. Appeal of Formal Decision

During the appeal process, the Provost, President, and/or Board of Regents cannot overrule afaculty member's academic judgment.

2.4.1. Appeal to Provost or EVP for Health Sciences

Either party may appeal in writing the dean's decision to the Provost or EVP for Health Scienceswithin ten (10) working days of receipt of the decision. The Provost or EVP for Health Sciences ordesignee shall resolve the grievance utilizing any procedures available to the dean set outabove. At the Provost’s or EVP for Health Sciences’ discretion, the Provost or EVP for HealthSciences may refer the matter to the Faculty Ethics and Advisory Committee for consideration ofdisciplinary action against the faculty member involved, if such action appears warranted.

2.4.2. Appeal to the Board of Regents

In accordance with Regent Policy 1.5 (https://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-1/1-5.html), students affectedby a decision of the administration, faculty, student government, or hearing board may appealthe decision to the Board of Regents. The Board has discretion to determine whether the appealwill be considered. A request for a review by the Board of Regents shall be made in writing, andmust include the alleged facts, what happened in the proceedings to date, and the reasonsjustifying extraordinary review. Such requests must be filed in the President's Office within seven(7) working days of the date of the written decision from the last reviewer.

Article 3. Academic Dishonesty





3.1. Scope

This article sets forth procedures which shall be followed in cases of suspected academicdishonesty as defined in the Definitions Section of this Policy. These procedures are notexclusive; various UNM departments and programs may have additional policies and procedureson academic dishonesty.

3.2. Academic Dishonesty within Courses: Faculty-Imposed Consequences

3.2.1. When a violation of the academic dishonesty rules appears to have occurred within theacademic process, the faculty member shall discuss the apparent violation with theundergraduate student as soon as possible and give the undergraduate student an opportunityto explain. The faculty member may impose an appropriate consequence within the scope of theacademic activity, such as grade reduction and/or involuntary withdrawal from the course. Thefaculty member shall notify the undergraduate student of the academic consequence.

3.2.2. The faculty member may report the matter to the Dean of Students Office, by submittingwritten documentation describing the events and indicating if the faculty member wishes theDean of Students Office to pursue any additional disciplinary action against the undergraduatestudent. The faculty member may use the Dean of Students Office’s faculty adjudication form insubmitting the written documentation. The Dean of Students Office will notify the undergraduatestudent of the report, and the undergraduate student may request a copy of the report fromDean of Students Office. In cases where the undergraduate student has multiple findings ofacademic dishonesty, the Dean of Students Office may initiate additional disciplinary action inaccordance with the Policy.

3.2.3. The undergraduate student may challenge a faculty-imposed consequence using theprocess defined in section 2.3 herein.

3.3. Academic Dishonesty in Other Settings

When academic dishonesty occurs other than in connection with a course, the person whoobserves or discovers the apparent violation may transmit a statement describing theoccurrence in writing to the appropriate faculty member or the Dean of Students. The Dean ofStudents Office will notify the undergraduate student of the report, and the undergraduatestudent may request a copy of the report from Dean of Students Office. The faculty member orDean of Students will address the situation in accordance with sections 3.2.1 or 3.4 herein,respectively.

3.4. Sanctions Imposed by the Dean of Students

Upon receiving a report of academic dishonesty pursuant to section 3.3 herein, the Dean ofStudents may initiate disciplinary action in accordance with this Policy. In some instances, afaculty member may impose academic consequences and the undergraduate student may also

Faculty Handbook


be sanctioned by the Dean of Students for violating the Student Conduct Policy. A decision of theDean of Students may be appealed in accordance with Section 5.5 herein.

Article 4. Allegations of Discrimination and/or Sexual Harassment

UNM urges any individual who has experienced discrimination, sexual harassment, sexualmisconduct and/or sexual violence, or has knowledge about such an incident, to report theincident to the Title IX Coordinator at Office of Equal Opportunity within 24 hours, or as soon asreasonably practicable, by calling (505) 277-5251 or by email at [email protected]. Confidentialand/or anonymous reports can be made. Complaints can also be made to the UNM EthicspointHotline 1-888-899-6092.

UNM recognizes that an individual who has experienced sexual misconduct may want to speakwith someone on campus before deciding whether to report the incident to the police or OEO forinvestigation. UNM and community partners have developed a victim-centered andvictimcontrolled process. The following centers are designated advocacy and support sites forthose students who have experienced all types of crimes or violence including sexualmisconduct. Students who utilize these centers may talk with anonymity to individuals employedat these centers. However, these centers will report the nature, date of report, and generallocation of the incident to UNM’s Clery Act Compliance Officer.

• LoboRESPECT Advocacy Center – Phone Number: (505)277-2911 Website:https://loborespect.unm.edu/ (https://loborespect.unm.edu/)

• LGBTQ Resource Center – Phone Number: (505)277-5428 Website: https://lgbtqrc.unm.edu(http://lgbtqrc.unm.edu/)

• Women’s Resource Center – Phone Number (505)277-3716 Website: https://women.unm.edu(https://unmwrc.wordpress.com/)

4.1. Scope

This article sets forth the procedures which should be followed when there are allegations thatan undergraduate student has engaged in an act of discrimination or sexual harassment, whichincludes sexual misconduct and sexual violence.

4.2. Reporting to/and Investigation by the Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO)

4.2.1. Allegation(s) that a student has engaged in an act of discrimination or sexual harassmentwill be referred to UNM’s Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO) for investigation pursuant to OEO’sDiscrimination Grievance Procedure. A duly appointed UNM Hearing Officer will determine, inaccordance with approved procedures, whether UNM’s antidiscrimination or sexual harassmentpolicies have been violated.

4.2.2. Neither OEO nor the Hearing Officer has sanctioning authority. If the respondent is anundergraduate student other than an HSC undergraduate student and is found to have violated

https://loborespect.unm.edu/

https://loborespect.unm.edu/

http://lgbtqrc.unm.edu/

http://lgbtqrc.unm.edu/

https://unmwrc.wordpress.com/

https://unmwrc.wordpress.com/



policy, the Dean of Students Office will determine the sanction to be imposed, as definedthrough Regent Policy 4.2 (https://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-4/4-2.html) “Student Code of Conduct.” Ifthe respondent is an HSC undergraduate student, the applicable HSC dean will determine thesanction. Before determining sanctions for sexual discrimination, the applicable HSC deanshould consult with the Dean of Students to ensure consistency of sanctions pertaining to theHearing Officer’s findings. Sanctions should be designed to eliminate the misconduct, prevent itsrecurrence, and remedy its effects, while supporting UNM’s educational mission and obligationsunder UNM policy and state and federal law, including but not limited to Title IX of the EducationAmendments of 1972 (including 2020 Regulations), the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the NewMexico Human rights Act. A finding of policy violation by the hearing officer and the sanctionimposed will be considered issued at the same time, if the two are provided to the student withinfive (5) business days of each other. The student can choose to appeal either or both the findingof policy violation and the sanction as described herein.

If the respondent is a faculty member, the faculty member’s department chair will determine thesanction to impose in accordance with Faculty Handbook Policy C07 (/c07/) “Faculty Discipline.” Ifthe respondent is a staff member, the staff member’s supervisor will determine the sanction tobe imposed in accordance with University Administrative Policy 3215(http://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/3000/3215.html) “Performance Management.”

4.3. Appeals

4.3.1.

Non-HSC Students Appeal OEO of Hearing Officer’s Determination and/or Sanctions Issued bythe Office of the Dean of Students to the UNM President The student may appeal the HearingOfficer’s finding and, if applicable the Dean of Students’ sanction. If a student wishes to appealboth the Hearing Officer’s determination and the imposed sanction, the appeals must be filed atthe same time; separate appeals will not be permitted.

The appeal must be in writing and contain a statement specifying what action(s) is/are beingappealed and the grounds for appeal. The request for appeal must be received at the Office ofthe President within seven (7) working days of the date of the written decision from either theHearing Officer or the Office of the Dean of Students, whichever is later.

Refer to the OEO Discrimination Grievance Procedures for allowable grounds and procedures forappeal of the Hearing Officer’s determination. Appeals of sanctions issued for violations of theUniversity's prohibition against discrimination, including sex discrimination, sexual harassment,sexual misconduct, or sexual violence, are only permissible if the grounds for such appeal arethat: 1) there was significant procedural error of a nature sufficient to have materially affectedthe outcome; 2) the decision was not in accordance with the evidence presented; 3) there issignificant new evidence of which the appellant was not previously aware, that the appellantcould not have possibly discovered through the exercise of reasonable diligence, and theabsence of which was sufficient to have materially affected the outcome ; and/or 4) the severity







Faculty Handbook


of the sanction is grossly disproportionate to the violation(s) committed.

The Hearing Officer’s determination and/or the sanctioning decision in cases involvingdiscrimination that are not related to sexual harassment, sexual misconduct, or sexual violence.may be appealed only by the sanctioned student. However, the Hearing Officer’s determinationand/or a sanctioning decision in cases involving sexual discrimination, sexual harassment,sexual misconduct, or sexual violence may be appealed by either the sanctioned student orcomplainant.

4.3.1.1. Appeal to the Board of Regents

In accordance with Regent Policy 1.5 (http://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-1/1-5.html), students affectedby a decision of the administration, faculty, student government, or hearing board may appealthe decision to the Board of Regents. The Board has discretion to determine whether the appealwill be considered. A request for a review by the Board of Regents shall be made in writing andmust include the alleged facts, what happened in the proceedings to date, and the reasonsjustifying extraordinary review. Such requests must be filed in the President's Office within seven(7) working days of the date of the written decision from the last reviewer.

4.3.2. HSC Students Appeal of Hearing Officer’s Determination and/or SanctionsIssued by the Applicable HSC Dean to the EVP for Health Sciences (EVPHS)

HSC undergraduate students may appeal the Hearing Officer’s finding and, if applicable thesanction imposed by the applicable HSC dean. If a student wishes to appeal both the HearingOfficer’s determination and the imposed sanction, the appeals must be filed at the same time;separate appeals will not be permitted.

The appeal must be in writing and contain a statement specifying what action(s) is/are beingappealed and the grounds for appeal. The request for appeal must be received at the Office ofthe EVP for Health Sciences within seven (7) working days of the date of the written decisionfrom the applicable HSC dean.

Refer to the OEO Discrimination Grievance Procedures for allowable grounds and procedures forappeal of the Hearing Officer’s determination. Appeals of sanctions issued for violations ofUNM’s prohibition against discrimination, including sex discrimination, sexual harassment,sexual misconduct, or sexual violence, are only permissible if the grounds for such appeal arethat: 1) there was significant procedural error of a nature sufficient to have materially affectedthe outcome; 2) the decision was not in accordance with the evidence presented; 3) there issignificant new evidence of which the appellant was not previously aware, that the appellantcould not have possibly discovered through the exercise of reasonable diligence, and theabsence of which was sufficient to have materially affected the outcome ; and/or 4) the severityof the sanction is grossly disproportionate to the violation(s) committed.

The Hearing Officer’s determination and/or the sanctioning decision in cases involving

http://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-1/1-5.html




discrimination that are not related to sexual harassment, sexual misconduct, or sexual violence.may be appealed only by the sanctioned student. However, the Hearing Officer’s determinationand/or a sanctioning decision in cases involving sexual discrimination, sexual harassment,sexual misconduct, or sexual violence may be appealed by either the sanctioned student orcomplainant.

4.3.2.1. Discretionary Appeal to the UNM President

The President has the discretionary authority to review the decision of the EVP for HealthSciences. A request for a review by the President shall be made in writing, and must include thealleged facts, what happened in the proceedings to date, and the reasons justifyingextraordinary review. Such requests must be filed in the President's Office within seven (7)working days of the date of the written decision from the last reviewer.


In accordance with Regent Policy 1.5, students affected by a decision of the administration,faculty, student government, or hearing board may appeal the decision to the Board of Regents.The Board has discretion to determine whether the appeal will be considered. A request for areview by the Board of Regents shall be made in writing and must include the alleged facts,what happened in the proceedings to date, and the reasons justifying extraordinary review. Suchrequests must be filed in the President's Office within seven (7) working days of the date of thewritten decision from the last reviewer.

4.4. Disciplinary Information Provided to Victim of Violence or a Non-forcible SexOffense

Upon written request, Dean of Students, to the extent permitted by the federal FamilyEducational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), will disclose to the individual who alleges that theywere subjected to a crime of violence or a nonforcible sex offense the final results of thedisciplinary proceedings conducted by UNM issued to the undergraduate student who is thealleged perpetrator of the offense(s) alleged. If the individual who is alleged to have beensubjected to the crime of violence or nonforcible sex offense at issue is deceased as a result ofsuch offense(s), the next of kin of such individual shall be treated the same as that individual forthe purpose of disclosing the final result of the disciplinary proceedings.

Additionally, in cases of sexual violence as described herein, the respondent and inquiringparties have the right to be notified in writing of the final determination and any sanctionsimposed to the extent permitted by the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act(FERPA).

Article 5. Allegations of Student Misconduct NOT Involving Discrimination or SexualHarassment.

Faculty Handbook


5.1. Scope

This article sets forth the procedures which should be followed when there are allegations thatan undergraduate student violated Regent Policy 4.2 “Student Code of Conduct” or other UNMpolicy not involving discrimination or sexual harassment, which are addressed in Article 4 herein.

5.2. Referral of Misconduct to Dean of Students Office for Non-HSC Students

Allegations of misconduct in violation of the Student Code of Conduct or other UNM policy mustbe in writing and submitted to the Dean of Students Office which has primary authority to dealwith disciplinary matters pertaining to undergraduate students other than HSC undergraduatestudents. Complaints of alleged misconduct should be submitted as soon as possible after theevent takes place, preferably within sixty (60) calendar days. Absent just cause, complaintsmust be submitted within one (1) year following discovery of the suspected misconduct.

The standard of proof utilized to resolve misconduct violating the Student Code of Conductcharges shall be that of preponderance of the evidence, meaning that the evidence, consideredin its entirety, indicates that, more likely than not, the accused undergraduate student (orchartered student organization) violated UNM policy or the Code of Conduct. Charges will beresolved in accordance with the Dean of Students Procedures. A decision, in most cases, will berendered within sixty (60) calendar days of the filing of a complaint. This date can be modified atthe discretion of the Dean of Students if deemed necessary such as to conduct a hearing thatprotects the rights of all parties. Decisions of the Dean of Students pertaining to undergraduatestudents are subject to appeal in accordance with Section 5.5 herein.

An undergraduate student allegedly committing a criminal offense under state or federal lawthat is also a violation of the Student Code of Conduct or other UNM policy may be subject toUNM disciplinary proceedings. UNM may pursue disciplinary action against an undergraduatestudent at the same time the undergraduate student is facing criminal charges for the sameoffense, even if the criminal prosecution is pending. UNM may also pursue disciplinary actioneven if criminal charges were dismissed, reduced, or resolved in favor of the undergraduatestudent-defendant.

5.3. Referral of Misconduct to Applicable HSC Dean for HSC Undergraduate Students

Allegations of misconduct by an HSC undergraduate student in violation of the Student Code ofConduct, HSC Student Conduct policies, or other UNM policy must be in writing and submitted tothe applicable HSC dean. Complaints of alleged misconduct should be submitted as soon aspossible after the event takes place, preferably within sixty (60) calendar days. Absent justcause, complaints must be submitted within one (1) year following discovery of the suspectedmisconduct.

The standard of proof utilized to resolve misconduct charges shall be that of preponderance ofthe evidence, meaning that the evidence, considered in its entirety, indicates that, more likely



than not, the accused undergraduate HSC student violated UNM or HSC policies. The applicableHSC dean will render a decision within sixty (60) calendar days of the filing of a complaint. Thisdate can be modified at the discretion of the dean if deemed necessary such as to conduct ahearing that protects the rights of all parties.

An HSC undergraduate student allegedly committing a criminal offense under state or federallaw that is also a violation of the Student Code of Conduct or other UNM policy may be subject toUNM disciplinary proceedings. UNM may pursue disciplinary action against an HSCundergraduate student at the same time the HSC undergraduate student is facing criminalcharges for the same offense, even if the criminal prosecution is pending. UNM may also pursuedisciplinary action even if criminal charges were dismissed, reduced or resolved in favor of theHSC undergraduate student-defendant.

5.4. Emergency Suspension and Banning from Campus

The Dean of Students may immediately suspend an undergraduate student (or charteredstudent organization) and/or ban an undergraduate student if the Dean concludes that theperson's continued presence on the campus may endanger persons or property or may threatendisruption of the academic process or other campus functions. When a person has beenimmediately suspended or banned by the Dean of Students, the person may request to meetwith the Dean to consider whether the emergency suspension should be continued. Forundergraduate students and chartered student organizations, an emergency suspension orbanning does not end the disciplinary process. Resolution of the charges will proceed as set forthherein.

5.5. Appeals, Records, and Rights

5.5.1. Appeal of Sanctions by Issued by Dean of Students

The decision on sanctions pertaining to undergraduate students made by the Dean of Studentsmay be appealed to the Vice President for Student Affairs if the sanction imposed by theCommittee is suspension, expulsion or banning from the campus or results in a significantinterruption toward degree completion. The undergraduate student must submit a writtenrequest for appeal to the Vice President for Student Affairs within seven (7) working days of thedate of the written decision from the Dean of Students. The grounds for appeal to the VicePresident are that: 1) there was significant procedural error of a nature sufficient to havematerially affected the outcome; 2) the decision was not in accordance with the evidencepresented; 3) there is significant new evidence of which the appellant was not previously aware,that the appellant could not have possibly discovered through the exercise of reasonablediligence, and the absence of which was sufficient to have materially affected the outcome ;and/or 4) the severity of the sanction is grossly disproportionate to the violation(s) committed.

The Vice President for Student Affairs will send written notification of the decision to theappealing party within seven (7) of receiving the request for appeal. A copy of the decision shall

Faculty Handbook


be sent to the Dean of Students.

5.5.2. Appeal of Sanctions Issued by the Applicable HSC Dean

Decisions regarding HSC undergraduate students receiving a sanction of suspension, expulsionor banning from campus or which results in a significant interruption toward degree completionimposed by the applicable HSC dean for violations of UNM or HSC policies may be appealed tothe EVP for Health Sciences. The undergraduate HSC student must submit a written request forappeal to the Office of the EVP for Health Sciences within seven (7) working days of the date ofthe written decision from the applicable HSC dean. The grounds for appeal to the EVP for HealthSciences are that: 1) there was significant procedural error of a nature sufficient to havematerially affected the outcome; 2) the decision was not in accordance with the evidencepresented; 3) there is significant new evidence of which the appellant was not previously aware,that the appellant could not have possibly discovered through the exercise of reasonablediligence, and the absence of which was sufficient to have materially affected the outcome ;and/or 4) the severity of the sanction is grossly disproportionate to the violation(s) committed.

The EVP for Health Sciences will notify the appealing party of the EVP for Health Sciences’decision within ten (10) working days of receiving the request for appeal. A copy of the decisionshall be sent to the applicable HSC dean.




In accordance with Regent Policy 1.5, students may appeal the decision to the Board of Regents.The Board has discretion to determine whether the appeal will be considered.” A request for areview by the Board of Regents shall be made in writing, and must include the alleged facts,what happened in the proceedings to date, and the reasons justifying extraordinary review. Suchrequests must be filed in the President's Office within seven (7) working days of the date of thewritten decision from the last reviewer.

Article 6. General Provisions

6.1. Undergraduate Student Conduct Records

Records regarding undergraduate student conduct shall be kept in the Dean of Students Officefor a period of ten (10) years after final disposition, except for records of expulsions which shall



be permanently maintained. Copies of the final decision shall, in an academic dishonesty case,be sent to the faculty member.

6.2. Rights of the Parties Participating in Grievances

The rights of the parties participating in grievances as provided herein include:

6.2.1. The party charged with an alleged violation has the right to written notice of the chargesat issue in the proceeding that contains sufficient detail and time to prepare for a hearing.

6.2.2. The party charged with an alleged violation has the right to a timely hearing before anappropriate official or committee.

6.2.3. The party charged with an alleged violation has the right to know the nature and sourceof the evidence used in a hearing process.

6.2.4. Both parties have the right to present evidence on their own behalf.

6.2.5. Both parties have the right to choose not to testify and/or not to answer questions; insuch cases, the decision maker will decide the charges based upon all of the evidencepresented.

6.2.6. Subject to the limits set forth in this Policy, both parties have the right to be accompaniedby an advisor at a hearing. The advisor may be an attorney retained by a party at their ownexpense. The advisor, including an attorney advisor, cannot act as a representative of theadvisee, cannot have a voice in meetings or hearings and therefore is not permitted to presentarguments or evidence or otherwise participate directly in meetings or hearings.”

6.2.7. The party alleging that the accused undergraduate student engaged in misconduct hasthe right to submit a victim impact statement to the hearing officer or committee during thesanctioning portion of the discipline process.

6.2.8. The party alleging that the accused undergraduate student engaged in misconduct hasthe right to have past irrelevant behavior excluded from the discipline process.

6.2.9. Both parties have the right to be free from retaliation for having made an allegation ofmisconduct or having participated in a grievance under this procedure. See UAP Policy 2200(http://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/2000/2200.html) “Reporting Suspected Misconduct and WhistleblowerProtection from Retaliation.”

6.3. Variances

6.3.1. Introduction

This Policy, to the extent applicable, shall apply to all UNM units. Because of differences in



Faculty Handbook


administrative structure, however, some modifications to these rules are necessary. Thefollowing sections identify those modifications.

6.3.2. Health Sciences Center

Undergraduate students in academic programs in the Health Sciences Center (HSC) haveadopted student codes of conduct (including standards of professionalism) with whichundergraduate students in those academic programs must comply, in addition to the UNMStudent Code of Conduct and other UNM policies. Except for allegations of discrimination orsexual harassment, which shall be referred to the UNM OEO Office as provided in Article 4herein, to the extent that HSC academic programs have adopted policies and procedures thatgovern the adjudication of undergraduate student conduct and undergraduate student grievancematters, those policies and procedures supersede this Policy. A decision by the dean of theSchool of Medicine, College of Pharmacy, College of Nursing, or College of Population Health maybe appealed to the EVP for Health Sciences, or designee, under procedures adopted by the EVPfor Health Sciences’ Office. Discretionary review by the UNM President and Board of Regents, asprovided for in Section 5.5 herein, is accorded to undergraduate students in academic programsin the HSC.

6.4. Former Students

These procedures apply to disputes between undergraduate students and other members of theUNM community. If the undergraduate student has left the UNM community (by graduation orotherwise), these procedures shall continue to apply so long as the event giving rise to thedispute occurred while the student was a member of the UNM community and so long as UNMhas the power to resolve the matter. UNM retains the right to change grades or rescind degrees,when, after the grade or degree has been awarded, it discovers new information indicating thatthe grade or degree was not earned in accordance with all UNM academic, student conduct andother applicable requirements and policies.

6.5. Designees of Deans, Vice Presidents, Vice Chancellors, or Senior LevelAdministrators

Whenever this Policy specifies an action or decision by a college/school dean, the Dean ofStudents, a vice president, a vice chancellor, or other senior level administrator, that individualmay delegate consideration and decision of the matter to a designee. Such designee willnormally be, but is not required to be, a member of the decision maker's staff.

HistoryAugust 14, 2020 – Revised to address Title IX Rule ChangesApril 15, 2020 – Revisions approved by the PresidentSeptember 24, 2019 – Revisions approved by the Faculty Senate



May 13, 2014 – Revisions approved by the PresidentJuly 2, 2013 – Revisions approved by the PresidentJune 19, 2001 – Revisions approved by the PresidentMarch 5, 1999 – Revisions approved by the PresidentMay 1995 – Revisions approved by the PresidentMay 1994 – Revisions approved by the Faculty SenateAugust 11, 1987 – Approved by Board of RegentsMay 2, 1087 – Approved by GSA SenateApril 1, 1987 – Approved by ASUNM SenateMarch 10, 1987 – Approved by Faculty Senate

Faculty Handbook


D176: Graduate and Professional Student Conduct and Grievance Procedures


D176: Graduate and Professional StudentConduct and Grievance Procedures

Approved by: Faculty Senate and UNM PresidentEffective: August 14, 2020Responsible Committee: Faculty Senate Graduate and Professional CommitteeOffice Responsible for Administration: Graduate Studies and Dean of Students

Revisions to the Policy Rationale, Policy Statement, and Applicability sections of this documentmust be approved by the Faculty Senate and the UNM President after consultation with theGPSA President, Graduate Studies, and the Dean of Students.

Policy RationaleThe University of New Mexico (UNM) is committed to academic excellence and student success.This Policy provides procedures for resolution of complaints, disputes, or grievances of anacademic nature initiated by students enrolled in graduate and professional degree programs atUNM. It also addresses allegations of discrimination or sexual harassment, and allegations ofstudent misconduct, as well as procedures for handling student disciplinary matters. This Policydoes not apply to undergraduate students in professional schools, which are subject to FacultyHandbook Policy D175 (/d175/) “Undergraduate Student Conduct and Grievance Policy.”

Policy StatementWhenever possible, it is important to take a supportive problem-solving approach to resolvingacademic disputes. However, UNM may take disciplinary action against a student for a violationof the Student Code of Conduct or other UNM policy when the offense occurs on UNM premisesor at a UNM-sponsored event, or when the violation occurs off campus and failure to takedisciplinary action is likely to disrupt the academic process or other campus functions, orendanger the health, safety or welfare of the UNM community or any individual student oremployee.

1. Matters Covered under this Policy

1.1. Petitions to Modify Academic Requirements due to unusual or extraordinary events.

1.2. Academic record disputes involving students seeking retroactive withdrawal, enrollment,or disenrollment, or for other academic record changes.

1.3. Academic disputes arising within the academic process, whereby a student believes that



Faculty Handbook


academic progress has been evaluated in an unfair or improper manner by a faculty member oracademic program/department in connection with the academic process. For example, it appliesto disputes over assignment of grades, decisions about program or degree requirements oreligibility, or claims that course requirements are unfair.

1.4. Allegations of Academic Dishonesty arising from violation of academic dishonesty rulesas defined in the Definitions Section.

1.5. Allegations of Discrimination and/or Sexual Harassment

UNM urges any individual who has experienced discrimination, sexual harassment, sexualmisconduct and/or sexual violence, or has knowledge about such an incident, to report theincident to the Title IX Coordinator at Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO) within 24 hours, or assoon as reasonably practicable, by calling (505) 277-5251 or by email at [email protected] and/or anonymous reports can be made (refer to Procedures Article 5 herein forreporting options). Complaints can also be made to the UNM Ethicspoint Hotline1-888-899-6092. The UNM OEO is tasked with investigating allegations of discrimination, sexualharassment, sexual misconduct and/or sexual violence. If UNM as represented by the designatedHearing Officer, determines that a graduate student has violated UNM anti-discrimination orsexual harassment policies, disciplinary proceedings shall be handled under the Procedures setforth in Article 5 herein.

1.6. Allegations of Student Misconduct NOT Involving Discrimination or SexualHarassment arising from violation of the Student Code of Conduct or other UNM policy.

2. Matters that may also be Covered under other UNM Policies

2.1. School of Law

Students attending the UNM School of Law must comply with the UNM Law School Bulletin andHandbook of Policies (Bulletin), in addition to this Policy. Allegations of academic misconduct, asenumerated in the Law School Student Code of Conduct (found in the Bulletin), are addressed bythe processes defined in that Code. Other kinds of alleged misconduct, except for allegations ofan act of discrimination or sexual harassment, may be addressed as described in the School ofLaw Administrative Due Process Policy and Procedure (found in the Bulletin). Allegations that astudent in the School of Law has engaged in any discriminatory or sexual harassment asprovided in Article 5. herein, shall be referred to the UNM OEO Office.

The Bulletin governs students enrolled in the Law School and to the extent this Policy differsfrom the policies and procedures in the Bulletin, the Bulletin supersedes this Policy. The School ofLaw may, refer cases of alleged student misconduct to the Dean of Students for review andpossible action under the UNM Student Code of Conduct. Discretionary review by the Board ofRegents, as provided for in Procedures Sections 5.3 and 6.8 herein, is accorded to students inthe School of Law.



2.2. Health Sciences Center

Graduate and professional students in academic programs in the Health Sciences Center (HSC)have adopted student codes of conduct (including standards of professionalism) with whichstudents in those academic programs must comply, in addition to the UNM “Student Code ofConduct” and other UNM policies. Except for allegations of discrimination or sexual harassment,which shall be referred to the UNM OEO, it is recognized that HSC academic programs may haveadopted policies and procedures that govern the adjudication of student conduct and studentgrievance matters. Such policies and procedures supersede this Policy. A decision by the dean ofthe School of Medicine, College of Pharmacy, College of Nursing, or College of Population Healthmay be appealed to the EVP for Health Sciences, or designee, under procedures adopted by theEVP for Health Sciences 's Office.

Discretionary review by the UNM President and Board of Regents, as provided for in ProceduresSections 5.3 and 6.8 herein, is accorded to graduate and professional students in academicprograms in the HSC.

3. Matters Not Covered Under This Policy

3.1. Disputes involving access to or information in a student's educational records shall followprocedures set forth in the UNM Student Records Policy, published in the student handbook, ThePathfinder.

3.2. Grievances arising out of a student’s status as a UNM employee hired through the StudentEmployment Office shall follow procedures set forth in the UNM Student Employee GrievanceProcedure, published in the student handbook, The Pathfinder.

3.3. Any student grievances concerning decisions made by UNM personnel, outside theacademic process, for which specific procedures are not established, shall be resolved betweenthe student and the office or department involved. If no resolution is reached, the parties mayappeal to the appropriate dean or director and then to the appropriate vice president, Provost, orEVP for Health Sciences . Appeals should be filed in writing within ten (10) working days of thedecision.

3.4. Disputes arising from a graduate or professional student holding an assistantship shallfollow procedures in the Faculty Handbook.

ApplicabilityAll academic UNM units, including the Health Sciences Center.

Revisions to the remaining sections of this document may be amended with the approval ofthe Faculty Senate Policy and Operations Committee in consultation with the responsible

Faculty Handbook


Faculty Senate Committee listed in Policy Heading.

DefinitionsAcademic Dishonesty includes, but is not limited to, plagiarism (including self-plagiarism),dishonesty in quizzes, tests, or assignments; claiming credit for work not done or done byothers; hindering the academic work of other students; misrepresenting academic orprofessional qualifications within or outside UNM; and nondisclosure or misrepresentation infilling out applications or other University records.

Complaint refers to:

• request for informal resolution of academic matters in Procedures Section 3.3. herein;• allegations of prohibited discrimination as defined herein filed with UNM's Office of EqualOpportunity; or• allegations of misconduct referred to the Dean of Students per Procedures Section 6.2. herein.

Discrimination includes all forms of unlawful discrimination based on an individual's or group'sprotected class(es), including unlawful discrimination based on age (40 and over), ancestry,color, ethnicity, gender identity, gender/sex, genetic information, medical condition, nationalorigin, physical or mental disability, pregnancy, race, religion, sexual orientation, spousalaffiliation, veteran status and any other protected class as described in University AdministrativePolicy #2720 (https://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/2000/2720.html) and #2740(http://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/2000/2740.html). Sexual harassment is a form of gender discriminationthat includes sexual violence, which is considered a severe form of sexual harassment. Forpurposes of this Policy, "discrimination" also includes retaliation for having made allegations ofdiscrimination, having participated in an investigation into allegations of discrimination, orotherwise having engaged in opposition to unlawful discrimination. Retaliation is explicitlyprohibited under University Administrative Policies #2200 (http://policy.unm.edu/university-

policies/2000/2220.html), 2720 (http://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/2000/2720.html), and 2740(http://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/2000/2740.html).

Graduate and Professional Students include both full-time and part-time students pursuinggraduate or professional studies. Student status continues for the entire period of enrollment,including UNM holidays, class breaks and summer session, if the student is enrolled for thepreceding spring and following fall academic terms. This Policy does not apply to undergraduatestudents in professional schools.

Misconduct is any activity performed by a UNM undergraduate student that violates stateand/or federal laws or regulations, local ordinances, or UNM policy.

Office of Equal Opportunity or OEO is the UNM office that processes allegations ofdiscrimination or sexual harassment as defined herein, including but not limited to investigating














such allegations and making determinations as to whether or not UNM's policies prohibitingdiscrimination or sexual harassment have been violated. OEO does not issue sanctions forviolations of policy.

Working Days refer to UNM traditional work days defined by UNM Human Resources as five (5)work days Monday through Friday ending at 5:00 PM. Working days do not include official UNMholidays listed in UAP Policy 3405 (https://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/3000/3405.html) “Holidays.”

Who should read this policy• Graduate and Professional Students• Faculty members• Staff in the Office of the Dean of Students• Staff in the Office of Equal Opportunity• Staff at Student Health and Counseling (SHAC)• Administrative staff responsible for student events

Related DocumentsRegents Policy ManualRPM 1.5 (https://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-1/1-5.html/) “Appeals to the Board of Regents”RPM 4.2 (https://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-4/4-2.html) “Student Code of Conduct”RPM 4.3 (https://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-4/4-3.html) “Student Grievances”RPM 4.4 (https://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-4/4-4.html) “Student Records”RPM 4.8 (https://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-4/4-8.html) “Academic Dishonesty”Faculty HandbookD75 (/d75/) “Classroom Conduct”D100 (/d100/) “Dishonesty in Academic Matters”D176 (/d176/) “Graduate and Professional Student Conduct and Grievance Policy”University Administrative Policies Manual2200 (https://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/2000/2200.html) “Reporting Suspected Misconduct andWhistleblower Protection from Retaliation”2720 (https://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/2000/2720.html) “Prohibited Discrimination and Equal Opportunity”2740 (https://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/2000/2740.html) “Sexual Misconduct”3405 (https://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/3000/3405.html) “Holidays”

The Pathfinder “Student Code of Conduct”Office of Equal Opportunity Discrimination Grievance Procedures(https://oeo.unm.edu/forms/pdf/-new_claims.pdf)

The School of Law Bulletin and Handbook of Policies (Bulletin(http://lawschool.unm.edu/academics/common/docs/bulletin-handbook-policies.pdf)) HSC School of Medicine, College ofPharmacy, College of Nursing, and College of Population Health Handbooks





























http://lawschool.unm.edu/academics/common/docs/bulletin-handbook-policies.pdf

http://lawschool.unm.edu/academics/common/docs/bulletin-handbook-policies.pdf

Faculty Handbook


ContactsDirect any questions about this Policy to Graduate Studies or the Dean of Students.

ProceduresReasonable deviations from these procedures by UNM will not invalidate a decision orproceeding unless significant prejudice results.

UNM School of Law Students

Graduate and professional students attending the UNM School of Law must comply with the UNMLaw School Bulletin and Handbook of Policies (Bulletin), in addition to this Policy (see section 2.1in Policy Statement above for more information). To the extent these Procedures differ from theBulletin, the Bulletin supersedes these Procedures. Pertaining to law students, the Dean of theLaw School, or designee, has the same sanctioning authorities as granted to the Dean ofStudents, and may fulfill the responsibilities placed with the Dean of Graduate Studies.

Health Sciences Center Students (HSC)

Graduate and professional students in academic programs in the HSC must comply withapplicable HSC student codes of conduct in addition to this Policy (see section 2.2 in PolicyStatement above for more information). To the extent these Procedures differ from HSC studentcodes of conduct, the HSC student codes of conduct supersede these Procedures Pertaining toHSC graduate and professional students, the EVP for Health Sciences, or designee, has the samesanctioning authorities as granted to the Dean of Students, and may fulfill the responsibilitiesplaced with the Dean of Graduate Studies.

Article 1. Petition to Modify Academic Requirements

Graduate and professional students wishing to petition to modify academic requirements shouldcontact the head of graduate and professional programs for their respective school or college.Graduate and professional students at the HSC wishing to petition to modify academicrequirements should contact their school or college dean. Graduate and professional students atthe Law School wishing to petition to modify academic requirements should contact theAssociate Dean for Academic Affairs at the Law School.

1.1. Scope

Graduate students may petition the Dean of Graduate Studies for an exception to any of theUniversity-wide policies or regulations specified in the UNM Catalog. Petitions are intended toallow students the opportunity to deal with unusual or extraordinary events, particularlycircumstances beyond their control that would penalize them unfairly. It should be kept in mind,



however, that a hallmark of fairness is the uniform application of the same standards anddeadlines to all students.

1.2. Petition

A petition should clearly state the specific nature of the exception or special consideration beingrequested and provide a complete but concise justification. If the request involves the extensionof a deadline, a proposed new deadline date should be indicated. Petitions must be submitted inthe sequence listed below:

1.2.1. The student must first submit the petition to the student’s graduate or professionaladvisor or equivalent, if one is assigned to the student. The advisor should indicate whether theadvisor endorses the student's request, and why.

1.2.2. The petition must next be submitted to the student's graduate unit -- the facultygraduate director, the chair, or the departmental graduate committee, depending upon thepractice in the particular unit. The student may choose to submit the petition to the graduateunit even if it was not endorsed by the advisor. The unit should also indicate whether it supportsor does not support the student¹s request, and why.

1.2.3. The petition should then be forwarded to the school or college dean. The student maychoose to submit the petition to school or college dean even if it was not supported by thestudent’s academic unit. The school or college dean or designee may ask the Faculty SenateGraduate and Professional Committee, serving in an advisory capacity, to review the petitionand offer its recommendation for approval or disapproval.

A written response to a petition will usually be sent to the student within ten (10) working daysfrom its receipt by the school or college dean, and a copy sent to the academic unit. (This periodmay be extended to allow for UNM holidays or other periods when UNM is not in session.) Theoriginal petition will be retained in the student's file. Petitions that are lacking requireddocumentation will be returned to the student, and will not be considered until alldocumentation has been received.

1.2.4. The student may appeal the dean’s decision to the Provost/EVP for Health Sciences andBoard of Regents in accordance with Section 3.4 herein.

Article 2. Academic Record Disputes

2.1. Scope

This article sets forth the procedures which should be followed by a student seeking retroactivewithdrawal, enrollment, or disenrollment, or for other academic record changes involvingexceptions to the rules governing registration and academic records which are set forth in theUNM Catalog. It does not cover disputes involving academic judgment (e.g. grades).

Faculty Handbook


2.2. Petitions

2.2.1. A student seeking a change in the student’s academic record within the scope of thisarticle shall submit a petition to Registrar’s Office for consideration by the Faculty SenateAdmissions and Registration Committee. The petition shall:

Include a statement of the nature of the request including why the student feels it should2.be granted.Specify the semester involved and the subject/department code, course and section4.numbers.Specify the student's name, UNM I.D. number, mailing address, email address and6.telephone number.Include documentation of extenuating circumstances, such as medical, family, or8.employment needs.Be typed and signed.10.Optionally, include supporting statements from involved faculty and academic units.12.

2.2.2. Upon receipt of the petition, Registrar’s Office shall forward a copy to the instructor of thecourse. The instructor shall make any response within fifteen (15) working days of receipt. If theinstructor has not responded within fifteen (15) working days, the Faculty Senate Admissions andRegistration Committee (“Committee”) shall proceed to consider the petition without theinstructor's response.

2.3. Committee Decision and Appeals Process

At the next regular meeting after receipt of the instructor's response (or lack of response), theFaculty Senate Admissions and Registration Committee shall take action on the petition. If theCommittee denies the petition, it shall issue a brief statement giving the reasons for the denial.Absent any new information from the student, the Committee’s decision shall be final. If thestudent has new information that was unavailable at the time the Committee made the decisionand that may affect the Committee’s decision of denying the petition, the student may requestreconsideration from the Committee. The Committee’s decision upon reconsideration is final forUNM.

Article 3. Academic Disputes

3.1. Scope

This article sets forth the procedures for resolution of a variety of possible issues related to theacademic process. These may include, but are not limited to, issues related to progress toward adegree and allegedly improper or unreasonable treatment, except that disputes or grievancesbased upon alleged discrimination or sexual harassment should be directed to the Office ofEqual Opportunity (OEO) in accordance with Article 5 herein. The procedures may not be used tochallenge the denial of admission to a degree program, nor to appeal the refusal of a petition by



the Dean of Graduate Studies for an exception to UNM-wide degree requirements, policies orprocedures.

3.2. Informal Resolution

Although conflicts that on occasion occur between students and faculty or administrators maybe resolved through formal adjudication, a more informal and productive kind of resolution -- onethat is mutually agreed upon by the parties involved -- is strongly encouraged.

3.2.1. A student with a complaint related to academic matters is encouraged to consult withGraduate Studies to discuss the concerns, seek to clarify pertinent rules and regulationsgoverning graduate study, and explore constructive ways to resolve the problem directly withthe faculty member or administrator involved. This should occur as soon as reasonably possibleafter the student has become aware of the problem.

3.2.2. The student should then arrange a meeting with the faculty or administrator involved inthe complaint to address the problem and to explore the possibility of a jointly achievedresolution.

3.2.3. If agreement cannot be reached, the student may seek the assistance of thedepartmental faculty graduate advisor and/or the chair in resolving the dispute. If the dispute iswith a faculty member in a department different from the student’s, the appropriate chair oradvisor would be in the department in which the faculty member resides or in which the coursein which the dispute arose was offered. It is expected that these administrators will play anactive part in helping to resolve the disagreement. In the event that the graduate unit involvedis non-departmentalized, the student may go directly to the school or college dean or director ofthat unit for assistance.

3.3. Formal Resolution of Academic Matters

If the matter cannot be resolved at the departmental level, the student may bring the problemto the attention of the school or college dean. The school or college dean will determine whetherto adjudicate the dispute or to refer the student to the Dean of Graduate Studies for a resolution.If the dispute is with a faculty member in a school or college different from the student’s, theappropriate dean would be the one in the unit in which the faculty member resides, or in whichthe course in which the dispute arose was offered. In the resolution of grievances at the level ofa school or college dean or the Dean of Graduate Studies, the following procedures will apply.

3.3.1. The Student must submit a formal, written statement of the grievance within ten (10)working days following completion of the informal discussions. This document should summarizethe facts that support the grievance, indicate the desired resolution and describe the effortsalready made at reaching that resolution, as well as their outcome. The faculty or staff memberagainst whom a grievance has been filed will be sent a copy of the written statement, and willhave five (5) working days in which to respond in writing to the school or college dean.

Faculty Handbook


3.3.2. The school or college dean will review all written materials submitted and provide bothparties the opportunity to review and respond to all evidence. The school or college dean willinterview each party, as well as any other persons who may have relevant information. Theschool or college dean may elect to hold an informal hearing involving both the parties to thegrievance and witnesses. If such a hearing is held, the parties will be given five (5) workingdays’ notice. Each party will be allowed to bring an advisor to the hearing, who may or may notbe an attorney, but the advisor may not participate in the hearing. Cross examination ofwitnesses will be permitted, although the school or college dean may require that questions bedirected though the school or college dean.

3.3.3. The school or college dean may choose to convene an advisory committee to helpevaluate the grievance. A school or college dean may utilize a standing committee from thatunit; the Dean of Graduate Studies will utilize the Senate Graduate and Professional Committee.

3.3.4. Generally, a written report on the grievance will be issued by the school or college deanwithin a period of twenty (20) working days after it has been formally filed, unless an informalhearing is held, in which case the decision shall be made within thirty (30) working days. (Thisperiod may be extended to allow for periods when UNM is not in session.) The report will explainthe school or college dean’s findings, conclusions, decision, and the basis for that decision. Acopy will be sent to each party, and to the chairperson or supervisor of the faculty or staffmember involved.

3.4. Appeal of Formal Decision

During the appeal process, the Chairperson, Dean, Provost, EVP for Health Sciences , and/orBoard of Regents cannot overrule a faculty member's academic judgement.

3.4.1. Appeal to Provost or EVP for Health Sciences

Either party may appeal in writing the school or college dean's decision to the Provost or EVP forHealth Sciences within ten (10) working days of receipt of the decision. The Provost or EVP forHealth Sciences or designee shall resolve the grievance utilizing any procedures available to theschool or college dean set out above. The Provost or EVP for Health Sciences may refer thematter to the Faculty Ethics and Advisory Committee for consideration of disciplinary actionagainst the faculty member involved, if such action appears warranted.


In accordance with Regent Policy 1.5 (http://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-1/1-5.html), students affectedby a decision of the administration, faculty, student government, or hearing board may appealthe decision to the Board of Regents. The Board has discretion to determine whether the appealwill be considered. A request for a review by the Board of Regents shall be made in writing, andmust include the alleged facts, what happened in the proceedings to date, and the reasonsjustifying extraordinary review. Such requests must be filed in the President's Office within seven





(7) working days of the date of the written decision from the last reviewer.

Article 4. Academic Dishonesty

4.1. Scope

This article sets forth procedures which shall be followed in cases of suspected academicdishonesty as defined in the Definitions Section of this Policy. These procedures are notexclusive; various UNM departments and programs may have additional policies and procedureson academic dishonesty.

4.2. Academic Dishonesty within Courses: Faculty-Imposed Consequences

4.2.1. When a violation of the academic dishonesty rules appears to have occurred within theacademic process, the faculty member shall discuss the apparent violation with the student assoon as possible and give the student an opportunity to explain. The faculty member shouldconsult with Graduate Studies to discuss possible courses of action. The faculty member mayimpose an appropriate academic consequence within the scope of the academic activity, suchasgrade reduction and/or involuntary withdrawal from the course. The faculty member shall notifythe student of the academic consequence.

4.2.2. The faculty member may report the matter to the Dean of Students, by submittingwritten documentation describing the events and indicating if the faculty member wishes theDean of Students Office to pursue any additional disciplinary action against the student. Thefaculty member may use the Dean of Students Office’s faculty adjudication form in submittingthe written documentation. The Dean of Students Office will notify the student of the report, andthe student may request a copy of the report from Dean of Students Office. In cases where thestudent has multiple finding of academic dishonest, the Dean of Students Office may initiatesanction(s) in accordance with this Policy.

4.2.3. The student may challenge an academic consequence imposed by a faculty memberusing the process defined in Procedures section 3.4. herein. The student may challenge asanction imposed by the Dean of Students for a code of conduct issue using the process definedin Procedures section 6.8.1 herein.

4.3. Academic Dishonesty in Other Settings

When academic dishonesty occurs other than in connection with a course, the person whoobserves or discovers the apparent violation may transmit in writing to the appropriate facultymember or Dean of Students a statement describing the occurrence. The faculty member orDean of Students will send a copy to the student and will address the situation in accordancewith Procedures sections 4.2.1 and 4.4 herein respectively.

4.4. Sanctions Imposed by the Dean of Students

Faculty Handbook


Upon receiving a report of academic dishonesty pursuant to section 4.3 herein, the Dean ofStudents may initiate disciplinary action in accordance with this Policy. In some instances, afaculty member may impose academic consequences and the student may also be sanctionedby the Dean of Students for violating the Student Conduct Policy. A decision of the Dean ofStudents may be appealed in accordance with Section 6.8.1 herein.

Article 5. Allegations of Discrimination or Sexual Harassment

UNM urges any individual who has experienced discrimination, sexual harassment, sexualmisconduct and/or sexual violence, or has knowledge about such an incident, to report theincident to the Title IX Coordinator at Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO) within 24 hours, or assoon as reasonably practicable, by calling (505) 277-5251 or by email at [email protected] and/or anonymous reports can be made. Complaints can also be made to the UNMEthicspoint Hotline 1-888-899-6092.

UNM recognizes that an individual who has experienced sexual misconduct may want to speakwith someone on campus before deciding whether to report the incident to the police or OEO forinvestigation. UNM and community partners have developed a victim-centered andvictimcontrolled process. The following centers are designated advocacy and support sites forthose students who have experienced all types of crimes or violence including sexualmisconduct. Students who utilize these centers may talk with anonymity to individuals employedat these centers. However, these centers will report the nature, date of report, and generallocation of the incident to UNM’s Clery Act Compliance Officer.

• LoboRESPECT Advocacy Center – Phone Number: (505)277-2911 Website:https://loborespect.unm.edu/• LGBTQ Resource Center – Phone Number: (505)277-5428 Website: https://lgbtqrc.unm.edu• Women’s Resource Center – Phone Number (505)277-3716 Website: https://women.unm.edu

5.1. Scope

This article sets forth the procedures which should be followed when there are allegations that astudent has engaged in an act of discrimination or sexual harassment, which includes sexualmisconduct and sexual violence.

5.2. Reporting to/and Investigation by the Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO)

5.2.1. Allegation(s) that a graduate or professional student has engaged in an act ofdiscrimination or sexual harassment will be referred to UNM’s Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO)for investigation pursuant to OEO’s Discrimination Grievance Procedure. A duly appointed UNMHearing Officer will determine, in accordance with approved procedures, whether UNM’santidiscrimination or sexual harassment policies have been violated.

5.2.2. Neither OEO nor the Hearing Officer has sanctioning authority. If the respondent is a



student and is found to have violated policy, the EVP for Health Sciences for HSC students, theDean of the Law School for law students, or the Dean of Students Office for all other graduate orprofessional students to determine the sanction to be imposed as defined in Regent Policy 4.2(http://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-4/4-2.html) “Student Code of Conduct.” Sanctions should bedesigned to eliminate the misconduct, prevent its recurrence, and remedy its effects, whilesupporting UNM’s educational mission and obligations under UNM policy and state and federallaw, including but not limited to Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (including 2020Regulations), the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the New Mexico Human rights Act. Beforedetermining sanctions for sexual discrimination, the Dean of the Law School or the applicableHSC dean should consult with the Dean of Students to ensure consistency of sanctionspertaining to the Hearing Officer’s determination OEO findings. A finding of policy violation bythe hearing officer and the sanction imposed will be considered issued at the same time, if thetwo are provided to the student within five (5) business days of each other. The student canappeal either or both the finding of policy violation and/or the sanction as described herein.

If the respondent is a faculty member, the faculty member’s department chair will determine thesanction to impose in accordance with Faculty Handbook Policy C07 (/c07/) “Faculty Discipline.” Ifthe respondent is a staff member, the staff member’s supervisor will determine the sanction tobe imposed in accordance with University Administrative Policy 3215(https://policy.unm.edu/university-policies/3000/3215.html) “Performance Management.”

5.3. Appeals

5.3.1. Non-HSC Professional and Graduate Students Appeal of Hearing Officer’sDetermination and/or Sanctions

5.3.1.1 Appeal to the UNM President

Students may appeal the Hearing Officer’s finding and, if applicable the sanction imposed by theOffice of the Dean of Students or the Dean of the Law School to the UNM President. If a studentwishes to appeal both the Hearing Officer’s determination and the imposed sanction, theappeals must be filed at the same time; separate appeals will not be permitted.

The appeal must be in writing and contain a statement specifying what action(s) is/are beingappealed and the grounds for appeal. The request for appeal must be received at the Office ofthe President within seven (7) working days of the date of the written decision from either theHearing Officer or the Office of the Dean of Students or the Dean of the Law School, whichever islater.

Refer to the OEO Discrimination Grievance Procedures for allowable grounds and procedures forappeal of the Hearing Officer’s determination. Appeals of sanctions issued for violations of theUniversity's prohibition against discrimination, including sex discrimination, sexual harassment,sexual misconduct, or sexual violence, are only permissible if the grounds for such appeal arethat: 1) there was significant procedural error of a nature sufficient to have materially affected







Faculty Handbook


the outcome; 2) the decision was not in accordance with the evidence presented; 3) there issignificant new evidence of which the appellant was not previously aware, that the appellantcould not have possibly discovered through the exercise of reasonable diligence, and theabsence of which was sufficient to have materially affected the outcome ; and/or 4) the severityof the sanction is grossly disproportionate to the violation(s) committed.



In accordance with Regent Policy 1.5 (http://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-1/1-5.html), students affectedby a decision of the administration, faculty, student government, or hearing board may appealthe decision to the Board of Regents. The Board has discretion to determine whether the appealwill be considered. A request for a review by the Board of Regents shall be made in writing, andmust include the alleged facts, what happened in the proceedings to date, and the reasonsjustifying extraordinary review. Such requests must be filed in the President's Office within seven(7) working days of the date of the written decision from the last reviewer.

5.3.2. HSC Professional and Graduate Students Appeal of Hearing Officer’sDetermination and/or Sanctions

5.3.2.1. Appeal to the EVP for Health Sciences

HSC students may appeal Hearing Officer’s finding and, if applicable the sanction imposed bythe applicable HSC dean to the EVP for Health Sciences. If a student wishes to appeal both theHearing Officer’s determination and the imposed sanction, the appeals must be filed at thesame time; separate appeals will not be permitted.

The appeal must be in writing and contain a statement specifying what action(s) is/are beingappealed and the grounds for appeal. The request for appeal must be received at the Office ofthe EVP for Health Sciences within seven (7) working days of the date of the written decisionfrom applicable dean.

Refer to the OEO Discrimination Grievance Procedures for allowable grounds and procedures forappeal of the Hearing Officer’s determination. Appeals of sanctions issued for violations of theUniversity's prohibition against discrimination, including sex discrimination, sexual harassment,sexual misconduct, or sexual violence, are only permissible if the grounds for such appeal arethat: 1) there was significant procedural error of a nature sufficient to have materially affectedthe outcome; 2) the decision was not in accordance with the evidence presented; 3) there is





significant new evidence of which the appellant was not previously aware, that the appellantcould not have possibly discovered through the exercise of reasonable diligence, and theabsence of which was sufficient to have materially affected the outcome ; and/or 4) the severityof the sanction is grossly disproportionate to the violation(s) committed.





In accordance with Regent Policy 1.5 (http://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-1/1-5.html), students affectedby a decision of the administration, faculty, student government, or hearing board may appealthe decision to the Board of Regents. The Board has discretion to determine whether the appealwill be considered. A request for a review by the Board of Regents shall be made in writing, andmust include the alleged facts, what happened in the proceedings to date, and the reasonsjustifying extraordinary review. Such requests must be filed in the President's Office within seven(7) working days of the date of the written decision from the last reviewer.

5.4. Disciplinary Information Provided to Victim of Violence or a Non-forcible SexOffense

Upon written request, the Dean of Students, to the extent permitted by the federal FamilyEducational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), will disclose to the individual who alleges that theywere subjected to a crime of violence or a nonforcible sex offense the final results of thedisciplinary proceedings conducted by UNM issued to the student who is the alleged perpetratorof the offense(s) alleged. If the individual who is alleged to have been subjected to the crime ofviolence or non-forcible sex offense at issue is deceased as a result of such offense(s), the nextof kin of such individual shall be treated the same as that individual for the purpose of disclosingthe final result of the disciplinary proceedings.

Additionally, in cases of sexual violence as described in Procedures Article 5 herein, therespondent and inquiring parties have the right to be notified in writing of the final



Faculty Handbook


determination and any sanctions imposed to the extent permitted by the federal FamilyEducational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).

Article 6. Allegations of Student Misconduct NOT Involving Discrimination or SexualHarassment

6.1. Scope

This article sets forth the procedures which should be followed when there are allegations that astudent violated the Student Code of Conduct or other UNM policy not involving discrimination orsexual harassment, which are addressed in Procedures Article 5 herein.

6.2. Referral of Misconduct to Dean of Students Office (Not Law or HSC Students)

Allegations of misconduct in violation of the Student Code of Conduct or other UNM policy mustbe in writing and submitted to the Dean of Students Office which has primary authority to dealwith disciplinary matters pertaining to students other than law or HSC students. Complaints ofalleged misconduct should be submitted as soon as possible after the event takes place,preferably within sixty (60) calendar days. Absent just cause, complaints must be submittedwithin one (1) year following discovery of the suspected misconduct.

The standard of proof utilized to resolve misconduct violating the Student Code of Conductcharges shall be that of preponderance of the evidence, meaning that the evidence, consideredin its entirety, indicates that, more likely than not, the accused student violated UNM policy theCode of Conduct. A decision, in most cases, will be rendered within sixty (60) calendar days ofthe filing of a complaint. This date can be modified at the discretion of the Dean of Students ifdeemed necessary such as to conduct a hearing that protects the rights of all parties.

6.3. Referral of Misconduct to the Law School Dean

Allegations of misconduct by a Law student in violation of the Student Code of Conduct or otherUNM or Law School policies must be in writing and submitted to the Dean of the Law School.Complaints of alleged misconduct should be submitted as soon as possible after the event takesplace, preferably within sixty (60) calendar days. Absent just cause, complaints must besubmitted within one (1) year following discovery of the suspected misconduct.

The standard of proof utilized to resolve misconduct shall be that of preponderance of theevidence, meaning that the evidence, considered in its entirety, indicates that, more likely thannot, the accused student violated UNM or Law School policy. A decision, in most cases, will berendered within sixty (60) calendar days of the filing of a complaint. This date can be modified atthe discretion of the Dean if deemed necessary such as to conduct a hearing that protects therights of all parties.

6.4. Referral of Misconduct to the Applicable HSC Dean



Allegations of misconduct by an HSC student in violation of the Student Code of Conduct orother UNM or HSC policies must be in writing and submitted to the applicable HSC dean.Complaints of alleged misconduct should be submitted as soon as possible after the event takesplace, preferably within sixty (60) calendar days. Absent just cause, complaints must besubmitted within one (1) year following discovery of the suspected misconduct.

The standard of proof utilized to resolve misconduct shall be that of preponderance of theevidence, meaning that the evidence, considered in its entirety, indicates that, more likely thannot, the accused student violated UNM policy or HSC policy. A decision, in most cases, will berendered within sixty (60) calendar days of the filing of a complaint. This date can be modified atthe discretion of the dean if deemed necessary such as to conduct a hearing that protects therights of all parties.

6.5. A student allegedly committing a criminal offense under state or federal law that is also aviolation of the Student Code of Conduct or other UNM policy may be subject to UNM disciplinaryproceedings. UNM may pursue disciplinary action against a student at the same time thestudent is facing criminal charges for the same offense, even if the criminal prosecution ispending. UNM may also pursue disciplinary action even if criminal charges were dismissed,reduced or resolved in favor of the student-defendant.

6.6. Unless otherwise specified in the decision, sanctions issued by the Dean of the Law School,applicable HSC dean, or Dean of Students Office (not including an Emergency Suspension asoutlined in in Procedures section 6.7 herein) shall not be implemented until the appeal processas set forth under Procedures section 6.8 herein is completed.

6.7. Emergency Suspension and Banning from Campus

The Dean of Students may immediately suspend a student and/or ban a student if the Dean ofStudents concludes that the person's continued presence on the campus may endanger personsor property or may threaten disruption of the academic process or other campus functions.When a person has been immediately suspended or banned by the Dean of Students, the personmay request to meet with the Dean of Students to consider whether the emergency suspensionshould be continued. For students an emergency suspension or banning does not end thedisciplinary process. Resolution of the charges will proceed as set forth in herein.

6.8. Appeals, Records, and Rights

6.8.1. Appeal of Sanctions Issued by the Dean of Students (Not Law or HSC Students)

6.8.1.1 Appeal to Vice President for Student Affairs

The decision on sanctions pertaining to graduate or professional students, other than Law orHSC students, made by the Dean of Students Office may be appealed to the Vice President forStudent Affairs if the sanction imposed is suspension, expulsion or banning from the campus or

Faculty Handbook


results in a significant interruption toward degree completion. The student must submit a writtenrequest for appeal to the Vice President for Student Affairs within ten (10) working days of thedate of the written decision from the Dean of Students Office. The grounds for appeal to the VicePresident for Student Affairs are that: 1) there was significant procedural error of a naturesufficient to have materially affected the outcome; 2) the decision was not in accordance withthe evidence presented; 3) there is significant new evidence of which the appellant was notpreviously aware, that the appellant could not have possibly discovered through the exercise ofreasonable diligence, and the absence of which was sufficient to have materially affected theoutcome ; and/or 4) the severity of the sanction is grossly disproportionate to the violation(s)committed.

The Vice President for Student Affairs will notify the appealing party of the Vice President’sdecision within ten (10) working days of receiving the request for appeal. A copy of the decisionshall be sent to the Dean of Students.


In accordance with Regent Policy 1.5 (http://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-1/1-5.html), students mayappeal the decision to the Board of Regents. The Board has discretion to determine whether theappeal will be considered. A request for a review by the Board of Regents shall be made inwriting, and must include the alleged facts, what happened in the proceedings to date, and thereasons justifying extraordinary review. Such requests must be filed in the President's Officewithin seven (7) working days of the date of the written decision from the last reviewer.

6.8.2. Appeal of Sanctions Issued by the Dean of the Law School

6.8.2.1. Appeal to the President

Decisions regarding Law students receiving a sanction of suspension, expulsion or banning fromcampus or which results in a significant interruption toward degree completion imposed by theDean of the Law School for violations of UNM or Law School policies may be appealed to thePresident. The student must submit a written request for appeal to the Office of the Presidentwithin seven (7) working days of the date of the written decision from the Dean of the LawSchool. The grounds for appeal to the President are that: 1) there was significant proceduralerror of a nature sufficient to have materially affected the outcome; 2) the decision was not inaccordance with the evidence presented; 3) there is significant new evidence of which theappellant was not previously aware, that the appellant could not have possibly discoveredthrough the exercise of reasonable diligence, and the absence of which was sufficient to havematerially affected the outcome ; and/or 4) the severity of the sanction is grosslydisproportionate to the violation(s) committed.

The President will notify the appealing party of the President’s decision and a copy will be sent tothe Dean of the Law School.






In accordance with Regent Policy 1.5 (http://policy.unm.edu/regents-policies/section-1/1-5.html), students mayappeal the decision to the Board of Regents. The Board has discretion to determine whether theappeal will be considered. A request for a review by the Board of Regents shall be made inwriting, and must include the alleged facts, what happened in the proceedings to date, and thereasons justifying extraordinary review. Such requests must be filed in the President's Officewithin seven (7) working days of the date of the written decision from the last reviewer. 6.8.3.Appeal of Sanctions Issued by an HSC Dean

6.8.3. Appeal of Sanctions Issued by an HSC Dean

6.8.3.1. Appeal to the EVP for Health Sciences

Decisions regarding HSC graduate or professional students receiving a sanction of suspension,expulsion or banning from campus or which results in a significant interruption toward degreecompletion imposed by the applicable HSC dean for violations of UNM or HSC policies may beappealed to the EVP for Health Sciences. The HSC student must submit a written request forappeal to the Office of the EVP for Health Sciences within ten (10) working days of the date ofthe written decision from the applicable HSC dean. The grounds for appeal to the EVP for HealthSciences are that: 1) there was significant procedural error of a nature sufficient to havematerially affected the outcome; 2) the decision was not in accordance with the evidencepresented; 3) there is significant new evidence of which the appellant was not previously aware,that the appellant could not have possibly discovered through the exercise of reasonablediligence, and the absence of which was sufficient to have materially affected the outcome ;and/or 4) the severity of the sanction is grossly disproportionate to the violation(s) committed.

The EVP for Health Sciences will notify the appealing party of the EVP for Health Sciences ’sdecision within ten (10) working days of receiving the request for appeal. A copy of the decisionshall be sent to the applicable HSC dean.

6.8.3.2. Appeal to the President



In accordance with Regent Policy 1.5, students may appeal the decision to the Board of Regents.The Board has discretion to determine whether the appeal will be considered. A request for areview by the Board of Regents shall be made in writing, and must include the alleged facts,



Faculty Handbook


what happened in the proceedings to date, and the reasons justifying extraordinary review. Suchrequests must be filed in the President's Office within seven (7) working days of the date of thewritten decision from the last reviewer.

Article 7. General Provisions

7.1. Student Conduct Records

Records regarding student conduct shall be kept in the Dean of Students Office for a period often (10) years after final disposition, except for records of expulsions which shall be permanentlymaintained. Copies of the final decision shall, in an academic dishonesty case, be sent to thefaculty member. 7.2. Rights of the Parties Participating in Student Code of Conduct GrievancesThe rights of the parties participating in grievances as provided herein include:

7.2.1. The party charged with an alleged violation has the right to written notice of the chargesat issue in the proceeding that contains sufficient detail and time to prepare for a hearing.

7.2.2. The party charged with an alleged violation has the right to a timely hearing before anappropriate official or committee.

7.2.3. The party charged with an alleged violation has the right to know the nature and sourceof the evidence used in a hearing process.

7.2.4. Both parties have the right to present evidence in their own behalf.

7.2.5. Both parties have the right to choose not to testify and/or not to answer questions; insuch cases, the decision maker will decide the charges based upon all of the evidencepresented.

7.2.6. Subject to the limits set forth in Procedures section 3.3.2 both parties have the right to beaccompanied by an advisor at a hearing, who may or may not be an attorney, but the advisormay not participate in the hearing. The advisor, including an attorney advisor, cannot act as arepresentative of the advisee, cannot have a voice in meetings or hearings and therefore is notpermitted to present arguments or evidence or otherwise participate directly in meetings orhearings.”

7.2.7. The party alleging that the accused student engaged in misconduct has the right tosubmit a victim impact statement to the hearing officer or committee during the sanctioningportion of the discipline process.

7.2.8. The party alleging that the accused student engaged in misconduct has the right to havepast irrelevant behavior excluded from the discipline process.

7.2.9. Both parties have the right to be free from retaliation for having made an allegation of



misconduct or having participated in a grievance under this procedure. Allegations of retaliationshould be submitted to the Dean of Students Office. See UAP Policy 2200 “Reporting SuspectedMisconduct and Whistleblower Protection from Retaliation.”

7.3. Former Students

These procedures apply to disputes between students and other members of the UNMcommunity. If the student has left the UNM community (by graduation or otherwise), theseprocedures shall continue to apply so long as the event giving rise to the dispute occurred whilethe student was a member of the UNM community and so long as UNM has the power to resolvethe matter. UNM retains the right to change grades or rescind degrees, when, after the grade ordegree has been awarded, it discovers new information indicating that the grade or degree wasnot earned in accordance with all UNM academic, student conduct, and other applicablerequirements and policies.

7.4. Designees of Deans, Vice Presidents, Vice Chancellors, or Senior LevelAdministrators

Whenever this Policy specifies an action or decision by a school or college dean, the Dean ofStudents, the Dean of Graduate Studies, a vice president, a vice chancellor, or a more seniorlevel administrator, that individual may delegate consideration and decision of the matter to adesignee. Such designee will normally be but is not required to be, a member of the decisionmaker's staff.

HistoryAugust 14, 2020 – Revised to address Title IX Rule Changes April 15, 2020 –Approved byUniversity PresidentSeptember 24, 2019 – Approved by Faculty SenateMarch 6, 1997 – Approved by Faculty Senate Graduate CommitteeOctober 20, 1994 -- Approved by Faculty Senate Graduate Committee

Faculty Handbook


Information: D25: Academic Renewal Policy


Information: D25: Academic RenewalPolicy

Information

Academic renewal applies to undergraduate degree-seeking students who have been readmittedto UNM after an absence of five years or more. The procedure allows a currently enrolled studentto request his/her academic record be reviewed for the purpose of evaluating previously earnedcredits and recalculating the student's grade point average from the point of readmission.

Students may obtain petition forms from the Records Office, Room 251, Student Services Center.If all criteria are satisfied, the petition will be approved and the academic record noted. Thefollowing guidelines apply:

ACADEMIC RENEWAL GUIDELINES

Academic Renewal may be applied only once and is not reversible.2.

An absence of five or more years must have elapsed between readmission and the last4.enrollment at UNM. (Note: Readmission to the University and acceptance in a degreeprogram must occur prior to Academic Renewal.)

The student must be currently enrolled in a degree-seeking status. Additionally, college6.entrance requirements such as minimum hours and grade point average must still be metafter the effect of Academic Renewal. (Note: Academic Renewal will not be applied if totalearned credits should fall below the minimum for entrance to the student's academic unit.)

At least 12 credit hours but no more than 36 credit hours must be completed in good8.standing (2.00 grade point average or better) since readmission before Academic Renewalcan be applied. (Note: Probationary status is determined by the degree-granting unit and isnot automatically changed by Academic Renewal.)

All graduation requirements must be satisfied after Academic Renewal, i.e., minimum10.earned credit, residence credit requirement, cumulative grade point average, etc. (Note:Credit earned prior to Academic Renewal will not count toward satisfying the residencecredit requirements.)

Faculty Handbook


All courses taken prior to Academic Renewal will remain unaltered on the record. An12.appropriate notation will be added to the record to indicate Academic Renewal. From priorcourses, those with a grade of C or better (or CR) will be carried forward as earned creditsonly. Acceptability of these credits towards a degree will be determined by the degree-granting unit.

Courses with a grade of C- or below taken prior to Academic Renewal will be noted and will14.not count for earned credits or for satisfying any graduation requirements.

Academic Renewal, when applied, will be effective as of the date of the readmission16.following the five-year absence.

The cumulative grade-point average after academic renewal will be calculated on the basis18.of courses taken since the readmission following the five-year absence.

Non-degree, second undergraduate degree, or graduate students are not eligible for20.Academic Renewal.

Information: D30: Allowable Maximum Semester Load


Information: D30: Allowable MaximumSemester Load

Information

The maximum number of hours which students may attempt during a regular semester withoutspecial approval is 18. During a summer session the maximum number is 9 hours. Individualcolleges may place lower limits on students in individual cases at their discretion. It should benoted that hours in excess of 18 during regular semesters and 9 during summer session aresubject to a tuition surcharge. (Refer to the Schedule of Classes (http://schedule.unm.edu/) for the percredit hour amount of these surcharges.)

http://schedule.unm.edu/


Faculty Handbook


Information: D40: Audited Courses


Information: D40: Audited Courses

Information

A student wishing to audit a course must be formally enrolled at the University either in regularor in nondegree status and must pay the full tuition rate for the course. The student must havethe permission of the instructor by the end of the fourth week of the semester. The student mustsubmit an Enrollment Authorization card to the Records and Registration Office to have the auditgrade option added to the student's registration. (Refer to the Schedule of Classes(http://schedule.unm.edu/) for additional information.) This permits proper identification of the student'sstatus as an auditor on the class list given the instructor (refer to Information: D60: Class Lists(/d60/), Faculty Handbook). Grades are not reported for auditors, but the student's permanentrecord reflects the enrollment as an auditor. The auditor, having paid the full tuition fee, isallowed full participation in class activities. (See also C320: Enrollment of Faculty in UniversityCourses (/c320/), Faculty Handbook).








Faculty Handbook


Information: D60: Class Lists


Information: D60: Class Lists

Information

From data acquired during registration, on-line class lists for each class are available. These listsare available to the instructor of record beginning with the semester’s registration. In addition toalphabetical listings with the names of the students who enrolled during registration for asection, the list will include a truncated social security number, college, enrollment status(credit-no credit, auditor, etc) and e-mail address. In the case of variable credit courses, theclass list shows the exact number of hours for which a particular student has enrolled. Studentsattending class who are not listed must be advised to complete formal registration or add thecourse by a program change. Students, who do not complete the registration procedure andaccordingly are not subsequently listed, are not to be permitted to attend class beyond thesecond week. The on-line class lists will be updated every evening throughout the semester tokeep them current with all student activity regarding the class. (Example: A student dropping theclass will be reflected the next day.) The professor is expected to maintain a current permanentclass roster. Class lists may be accessed online by using the following URL.https://classlists.unm.edu/ (https://classlists.unm.edu/)

https://classlists.unm.edu/

https://classlists.unm.edu/

Faculty Handbook


Information: D75: Classroom Conduct


Information: D75: Classroom Conduct

Information

The classroom instructor is responsible for all classroom conduct, behavior, and discipline.University policy permits only enrolled students, persons authorized by the instructor, andadministrative personnel to be admitted to instructional areas during scheduled periods.University policy and New Mexico state law also prohibit all forms of disruptive or obstructivebehavior in academic areas or any actions which would disrupt scheduled academic activity. Theinstructor may refer situations involving classroom misconduct to the Dean of Students foradditional action under the Student Code of Conduct (https://pathfinder.unm.edu/code-of-conduct.html) aspublished in the UNM Pathfinder (https://pathfinder.unm.edu/). Use of classrooms and other areas ofacademic buildings during nonscheduled periods is permitted only in accordance withdepartmental, college, or university practices.

Any person or persons in unauthorized attendance or causing a disturbance during scheduledacademic activity shall be identified by the instructor and asked to leave. Persons refusing sucha request may be removed by the University Police and are liable to legal prosecution.

Smoking, eating and drinking are prohibited in all classrooms and teaching laboratories,including seminars.

https://pathfinder.unm.edu/code-of-conduct.html

https://pathfinder.unm.edu/code-of-conduct.html

https://pathfinder.unm.edu/

https://pathfinder.unm.edu/

Faculty Handbook


Information: D105: Examination to Establish or Validate Credit


Information: D105: Examination toEstablish or Validate Credit

Information

Degree seeking students in an undergraduate college of the university may, with appropriatewritten approval, take an examination to establish or validate credit in courses appearing in theuniversity's general catalog. Students may not have been previously enrolled (or have earned aW/WP/WF grade) in the course at the university. Students enrolled in the Graduate School havethe same privilege, except that only undergraduate credit can be earned in this manner. Creditcannot be earned by examination to establish credit in nonprofessional physical educationactivity courses and in some professional physical education courses. A check with thedepartment will be necessary to determine which professional physical education courses can bechallenged by examination. Upon authorization, the dean or director of the college offering thecourse will issue a permit for the examination. This permit must be approved by the departmentconcerned and the dean or director of the student's college. The student must then pay thecurrent tuition rate per credit hour and submit the permit to the person who will administer theexamination. Once the examination has been administered and graded the instructor willcomplete the form and send it to the Records and Registration Office for recording on thestudent's record. Examination to establish credit can be taken only during the week beforeclasses start through the ending date of the semester or summer session. Credit will be allowedand placed on the student's permanent record as of the semester in which the examination iscompleted and will not count in the student's grade-point average prior to the completion of thatsemester. A grade of CR will be recorded for successful completion of examination. Creditsearned by examination at university count toward graduation and residence requirements.

Faculty Handbook


Information: D120: Resolving Grade Grievence Involving Failure to Accommodate


Information: D120: Resolving GradeGrievence Involving Failure toAccommodate

Information

The Accessibility Resource Center (ARC) offers services to help all qualified students withdisabilities gain equal educational access and opportunities throughout the UNM community.ARC has a Faculty Guide to Accommodating Students with Disabilities which includes informationfor Faculty and the academic unit on how to resolve a grade grievance involving a failure toaccommodate. Please see: http://as2.unm.edu/ (https://as2.unm.edu/)

https://as2.unm.edu/

https://as2.unm.edu/

Faculty Handbook


Information: D145: Instructor Drops

Information: D145: Instructor Drops

Information

Instructors may drop students from their classes for reasons of excessive absences. Instructordrop forms are available at the Records and Registration Office and in academic departments.The student is responsible for the completion of every course for which the student hasregistered; if the student drops a course at any time without completing the official change ofprogram procedures, a grade of F may be assigned even though the student may be passingwhen she or he stopped attending classes.

Section D: Teaching and Student Related Policies 5 D50 ...

Documents

Transcript of Section D: Teaching and Student Related Policies 5 D50 ...