Scott County Schools

2014 – 2015 Review

Agenda Policy 5.23 – Energy Management Energy Management Strategy Avoided Cost Summary Monthly Measurements Energy Star Portfolio Manager Ratings Energy Management Goals Energy Star Awards/Monthly Energy Reduction Award Energy Conservation Measures (ECM’s) Commercial Demand Conservation Program National Building Competition Woodford County Schools Support Summary Overall Scott County Schools Summary

School Board Policy 05.23 - Energy Management

It is the intent of the Board that the District use energy resources in a safe and efficient manner with an on-goingfocus on identifying and implementing cost saving measures and developing staff and student commitment to identifiedenergy management practices.

To promote this effort, the Superintendent/designee shall direct the development of an energy management plan(EMP) for Board approval and oversee the implementation and maintenance of that plan, which shall address thefollowing components:

1. A District level committee shall be appointed by the Superintendent/designee to develop and implement the energymanagement plan (EMP).

2. The District level committee shall track and monitor the EMP to determine progress toward managing and reducingenergy costs.

3. Effective with the 2011-2012 school year, the Superintendent/designee shall report the EMP results for each fiscalyear, including annual District energy usage, costs and anticipated savings to KPPC - the Kentucky PollutionPrevention Center – by October 1st annually through the Kentucky Energy Efficiency Program for Schools (KEEPS).

A status report on implementation of the plan in Board-owned andBoard-operated facilities shall be provided to the Board following theend of each fiscal year.

Energy Management Strategy Support District Vision Statement “To Create a

Collaborative Culture to Ensure Student Learning”

We collaborate with the District Energy Team, the School Energy Teams having community partners and with the Student Energy Teams

Projects have improved the learning environment

Focused on no cost/low cost projects first

Completed large projects: HVAC Control Projects at Western/Northern/SCHS and LED Lighting Projects at SCHS/9th Grade/Garth

Energy Management Avoided Costs SummaryProject Description Refunds/Rebates

ReceivedAvoided

CostsTotal Avoided

Costs

Rate Change Savings Prior Years

$142,420 (Refunds) $784,096 $926,516

Rate Change Savings Current Year

$199,363 $199,363

Consumption Savings Prior Years

$798,160 $798,160

Consumption Savings Current Year

$346,722 $346,722

Energy ProjectsPrior Years

$60, 171 (Rebates, Credits & Refunds)

$60,171

Energy ProjectsCurrent Year

$3,060 (Rebates, Credits & Refunds)

$3,060

Total $205,651 $2,128,341 $2,333,992

School Facility

2014

Actual

Kwh

2015

Actual

Kwh

%

Reduction Position

$ Cost

Change

2013-14

Actual Kwh

2014-15

Actual Kwh

%

Reduction

Overall

Position

YTD $ Cost

Change

GMS 58,400 54,040 7.5% 5 -$401 1,057,200 1,055,080 0.2% 14 -$182

RSMS 77,080 74,160 3.8% 9 -$268 1,215,840 1,271,200 -4.6% 17 $4,753

AME 73,316 58,060 20.8% 1 -$1,403 982,539 931,666 5.2% 6 -$4,367

Eastern 27,181 22,402 17.6% 2 -$439 517,031 462,757 10.5% 3 -$4,659

Garth 68,331 59,542 12.9% 4 -$808 702,431 649,422 7.5% 4 -$4,551

Northern 41,200 34,000 17.5% 3 -$662 622,800 513,200 17.6% 1 -$9,409

Southern 48,480 45,440 6.3% 7 -$279 789,440 776,960 1.6% 11 -$1,071

Stamping Ground 42,960 43,120 -0.4% 11 $15 577,040 556,270 3.6% 8 -$1,783

Western 55,200 66,800 -21.0% 17 $1,066 971,600 924,400 4.9% 7 -$4,052

Central Office/Misc 54,912 58,975 -7.4% 13 $374 777,328 751,434 3.3% 9 -$2,223

Preschool 15,941 15,627 2.0% 10 -$29 274,827 266,633 3.0% 10 -$703

SCHS 183,274 170,053 7.2% 6 -$1,215 3,065,514 2,674,873 12.7% 2 -$33,537

SCMS 55,920 62,400 -11.6% 15 $596 1,087,680 1,080,000 0.7% 12 -$659

ATC 4,248 4,022 5.3% 8 -$21 147,306 146,641 0.5% 13 -$57

9th Grade/Cardinal Acad. 36,000 40,800 -13.3% 16 $441 566,400 590,160 -4.2% 16 $2,040

ECS 39,200 40,800 -4.1% 12 $147 560,400 568,400 -1.4% 15 $687

Lemons Mill 43,615 47,616 -9.2% 14 $368 1,000,531 929,711 7.1% 5 -$6,080

Total 925,258 897,857 3.0% -$2,519 14,915,907 14,148,807 5.1% -$65,856

Scott County Schools

Energy Management Report

June 2015

2014 - 2015 YTD ResultsJune

Electrical Energy Cost Comparison to Last Year

-$70,000

-$60,000

-$50,000

-$40,000

-$30,000

-$20,000

-$10,000

$0

$10,000

July 2014 - June 2015 $ Cost Change

Note: The Schools with the Lowest Bars are doing the Best Job in Reducing Costs

Rating Rating Energy Use

(1-100) (1-100) Change From kbtu/sq ft Energy

June-15 June-10 Baseline(%) June-15 Star

Lemons Mill Elementary 96 93 -9.6% 28.3 Yes

Stamping Ground Elementary 95 91 -8.4% 34.0 Yes

Eastern Elementary 95 80 -29.4% 32.2 Yes

Elkhorn Crossing School 94 82 -16.5% 28.9 Yes

Southern Elementary 94 81 -23.7% 30.6 Yes

Royal Spring Middle School 93 74 -27.8% 28.3 Yes

Garth Elementary 91 87 -20.5% 33.4 Yes

SCHS/9th Grade/SCMS Campus 88 69 -21.7% 45.9 Yes

Northern Elementary 87 33 -44.6% 37.3 Yes

Georgetown Middle School 84 77 -12.0% 36.5 Yes

Western Elementary 81 48 -29.2% 37.8 Yes

Anne Mason Elementary 79 53 -24.9% 38.0 Yes

Preschool N/A N/A -13.6% 42.1 N/A

Central Office/Misc N/A N/A 8.2% 90.0 N/A

Group Total 90 71 -20.4% 39.1

Facility Name

Energy Star Portfolio Manager Ratings

96 95 95 94 94 9391

88 8784

8179

9391

8082 81

74

87

69

33

77

48

53

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100June-15

June-10

Energy Star

Energy Star Portfolio Manager Rating

28

3432

2931

28

33

46

37 37 38 38

31

37

46

35

40 3942

59

67

42

5351

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

June-15

June-10

EUI (kbtu/sq.ft/)

Energy Management Goals Status

Achieved all three of our goals:

Achieve over $2.0 million in total avoid cost – Actual $2.3M

Achieve 3% year to year reduction – Actual 5.1%

All schools earned Energy Star Award which requires a 75 rating

Energy Star Awards Stamping Ground – 2008/2011/2012/2013/2014 Southern – 2009/2011/2012/2013/2014 Eastern – 2009/2011/2012/2013/2014 RSMS – 2009/2011/2012/2013/2014 Garth – 2010/2011/2012/2013/2014 GMS – 2011/2012/2013/2014 ECS – 2011/2012/2013/2014 Northern – 2012/2013/2014 AME – 2012/2013/2014 SCHS/SCMS/9th Grade/Cardinal Academy – 2012/2013/2014 Western – 2014 Lemons Mill - 2014 District – Top Performer for 2012 District – Energy Star Partner of the Year – 2013/2015 GMS – Green Ribbon School Award – 2012 Northern – Green Ribbon School Award – 2013 RSMS – Green Ribbons School Award - 2015

2014 - 2015 Energy Reduction Award Winners

Northern = July, August, September, October, November, February, April & May (8 Times)

Lemons Mill = December & January (2 Times)

Eastern = March

Anne Mason = June

Energy Reduction Award Winners

Summary of Winners Since November 2009 Northern – 15 Times

RSMS – 8 Times

Southern/SCHS/SCMS/AME – 7 Times Each

Eastern Elementary – 6 Times

Georgetown Middle School – 3 Times

Western/Preschool/LME – 2 Times Each

Stamping Ground/ECS – 1 Time Each

Energy Conservation Measures (ECM’s)

LED Lighting for SCHS Back Parking Lot – Complete

LED Lighting for SCHS Lights on 24/7 – Complete

Replace light fixtures requiring repair with LED’s

Metal halide wall packs

CFL recessed light fixtures

Dark campus during summer months for schools

Near Term Energy Conservation Measures

Continue installing LED Retrofit Kit in T8 2’x4’ lights at SCHS using available funding from rebates/other

Improve building envelope with new windows at C.O.

Start replacing 400 watt metal halide outside lights

Outside LED with sensors that replace 400 watt metal halide – Good payback

Install occupancy sensors in large bathrooms in district – SCHS first priority (less than 8 year payback)

Long Term Energy Conservation Measures

Complete T8 conversion at SCHS to LED’s

Replace Outside Metal Halide (MH) lights with LED’s

Replace MH Lights in AME & SGE gyms with LED’s

Replace CFL Sports Lights at Southern & Middle School gyms with LED’s

Extend HVAC Control System to Eastern Elementary

Improve Building Envelope with New Windows at Garth/SCMS/9th Grade

Replace Window Air Conditioners at SCMS & 9th

Grade by upgrading HVAC system

Commercial Demand Conservation Program

Managed by ENERNOC for Kentucky Utilities

Four year term with potential of $24,000 per year

Impacts June – September after students leave

Manage demand using HVAC control system

Recommend using any funds for energy projects

Free real time meters have been installed

Help ensure reliable energy for our community

Real time data helps manage energy usage

Approved at April school board agenda

Scott County High School

Northern Elementary

2013 2014 2014 Rank for

Source Source Change From Kentucky

Energy Use Energy Use 2013(%) Buildings

SCHS/9th Grade/SCMS Campus 133.9 119.4 -10.8% 4

Western Elementary 135.9 124.3 -8.5% 7

Northern Elementary 131.8 127.4 -3.3% 33

Preschool 101.6 98.5 -3.1% 37

Southern Elementary 98.3 96.4 -1.9% 47

Eastern Elementary 109.2 107.3 -1.7% 51

Royal Spring Middle School 85.7 85.9 0.2% 89

Stamping Ground Elementary 108.3 109.8 1.4% 106

Garth Elementary 106.4 108.3 1.8% 115

Elkhorn Crossing School 87.1 90.2 3.6% 133

Anne Mason Elementary 119.5 125.9 5.4% 138

Georgetown Middle School 109.5 117.2 7.0% 147

Total District -4.2% 43

*

Facility Name

Scott County Schools Ranked 43rd in the Nation for Teams

National Building Competition

2013 2014 2014 Rank for

Source Source Change From Kentucky

Energy Use Energy Use 2013(%) Buildings

Simmons Elementary 155.5 128.8 -17.2% 1

Woodford County High School 163.9 141.6 -13.6% 2

Woodford County Central Office 138.2 122.5 -11.4% 3

Southside Elementary 150.6 137.2 -8.9% 6

Huntertown Elementary 125.5 115.3 -8.1% 9

Northside Elementary 169.8 159.1 -6.3% 13

Woodford County Middle School 145.2 137.3 -5.4% 16

Total -10.2% 8

*

Facility Name

Woodford County Schools Ranked 8th in the Nation for Teams

Woodford County National Building Competition

Rating Rating Energy Use Energy Use Change

(1-100) (1-100) kbtu/sq ft kbtu/sq ft From

May-15 June-13 May-15 June-13 Baseline

Huntertown Elementary 90 77 34.4 41.2 -16.5%

Simmons Elementary 82 62 41.3 49.8 -17.1%

Safe Harbor 76 60 46.9 51.9 -9.6%

Central Office 75 67 39.8 43.9 -9.3%

Southside Elementary 70 62 48.7 50.7 -3.9%

Woodford County High School 67 39 51.8 67.5 -23.3%

Woodford County Middle School 63 54 44.4 48.1 -7.7%

Northside Elementary 58 49 58.4 62.2 -6.1%

Group Total 70 54 46.7 54.6 -14.5%

Facility Name

Energy Star Portfolio Manager Ratings

90

82

76 75

7067

63

58

77

6260

67

62

39

54

49

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

HuntertownElementary

SimmonsElementary

Safe Harbor Central Office SouthsideElementary

WoodfordCounty High

School

WoodfordCounty

Middle School

NorthsideElementary

May-15

June-13

Woodford County Energy Star Portfolio Manager Rating

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Energy Star = 75----------------------

34.4

41.3

46.9

39.8

48.751.8

44.4

58.4

41.2

49.851.9

43.9

50.7

67.5

48.1

62.2

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

HuntertownElementary

SimmonsElementary

Safe Harbor Central Office SouthsideElementary

WoodfordCounty High

School

WoodfordCountyMiddleSchool

NorthsideElementary

May-15

June-13

EUI (kbtu/sq.ft/)

2014 Rank District 2010 EUI 2014 EUI 2010 Rank 2013 2014 Rank District 2010 EUI 2014 EUI 2010 Rank 2013

1 Owen 62.5 37.9 67 31 Paintsville 53.3 50.4 26

2 Butler 42.8 38.3 1 32 Trimble 52.3 50.5 20

3 Corbin 51.6 41.0 17 33 Harlan Ind 52.3 50.5 21

4 Walton-Verona 44.6 42.5 4 34 Metcalfe 60.9 50.5 63

5 Scott 53.3 42.7 25 8 35 Monroe 48.6 50.6 10

6 Anderson 52.3 43.4 19 36 Edmonson 58.7 50.6 52

7 Burgin 60.5 44.5 61 37 Magoffin 64.7 50.8 81

8 Oldham 45.7 44.9 5 39 Clinton 53.5 51.0 28

9 Martin DNR 45.2 163 38 Livingston 56.9 51.0 46

10 Casey 49.5 45.3 12 40 Lawrence 68.6 51.1 97

11 Henry 67.7 45.4 93 41 Allen 57.1 51.3 47

12 Gallatin 60.0 45.6 57 42 Estill 53.4 51.5 27

13 Meade 48.7 45.7 11 43 Pendleton 55.9 51.6 41

14 Murray 47.2 46.0 8 44 Williamstown 63.3 52.2 73

15 Russell 80.5 46.0 140 45 Trigg 60.2 52.3 59

16 Bullitt 53.7 46.3 29 47 Daviess 53.9 52.7 31

17 Erlanger 56.9 46.4 45 46 Adair 71.1 52.7 112

18 Warren 50.7 46.6 15 48 Boyle 65.9 52.8 88

19 Shelby 71.6 47.2 114 49 Floyd 52.0 52.9 18

20 Hancock 57.8 47.4 51 50 Silver Grove 69.2 52.9 100

21 Dawson Springs 61.0 47.7 65 52 Barren 49.8 53.1 13

22 Jessamine 50.3 47.8 14 51 Woodford 63.5 53.1 75 85

23 Wayne 64.2 47.8 78 53 Jackson Co 57.4 53.3 49

24 Letcher 62.9 48.1 72 54 Boyd 81.2 53.4 144

25 Robertson 114.5 48.5 160 55 Knox 64.8 53.5 83

26 Hardin 54.3 48.9 32 56 Grayson 60.0 53.7 58

27 Glasgow 62.6 49.5 68 57 Crittenden 57.1 53.8 48

28 Russell ind 70.3 49.6 108 58 Spencer DNR 54.0 164

29 Lee 78.3 50.0 137 59 South Gate 47.2 54.1 9

30 Mclean 45.9 50.1 6 60 Science Hill 56.5 54.1 44

Key Factors for a SuccessfulEnergy Management Program

Support from School Board & Superintendent

Buy in by all Principals – the building leaders

Buy in from all faculty and staff

Educate students on saving energy

Provide weekly and monthly reports for competition

Identify Energy Conservation Measures (ECM’s)

Implement ECM’s

Recognize achievements

Overall Summary Much progress has been made

Received Energy Star Partner of the Year Award in 2015

All Schools have now Earned the Energy Star Award

GMS won Green Ribbon School Award in 2012

Northern won Green Ribbon School Award in 2013

RSMS won Green Ribbon School Award in 2015

Achieved all of our goals during the year