Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change
description
Transcript of Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change
![Page 1: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural
Change
U8400, U.S. Science and Technology PolicyJanuary 31, 2001
![Page 2: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Technological Determinism
To what extent does technology determine the “nature of the socioeconomic order?”
Does technological change impose “certain social and political characteristics upon the society in which it is found?”
What influence to socioeconomic forces have on technological development?
![Page 3: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Technology as a Strong “Mediating Factor”
Technological progress is itself a social activity• invention and innovation is an attribute of
some societies but not others The course of technological advance is
responsive to social direction• rewards, inducements and incentives
offered by society affect advances in war, arts, agriculture, or industry
![Page 4: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Technology as a Strong “Mediating Factor”
Technological change must be compatible with existing social conditions and institutions
Adoption and repercussion of technology is largely governed by market considerations• political control can buffer disruptive
consequences
![Page 5: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Technology as American Culture: Franklin & Jefferson
Newly independent U.S. enamored with progress
New mechanical technologies as means of achieving a virtuous and prosperous society
Progress = pursuit of science and technology in the interest of human betterment (intellectual, moral, spiritual) and material prosperity• Franklin refuses to patent his inventions, seeing
them not as a source of private wealth but as a benefit for all members of society
![Page 6: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Technology as American Culture: Writing, Art and Ads
Tendency of writers to view new technologies both as instruments of power and as triumphant symbols of human progress
Currier and Ives issued over 200 prints focusing on steam power and the American experience
Ads prompted a certain way of thinking about technology• technology as the cause of human well-being• “better living through chemistry”
![Page 7: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Technology as American Culture: Criticism
“What have these arts done for the character, for the worth of mankind? Are men better?” (Ralph Waldo Emerson)
“We have been going past the danger signals without realizing that our speed, which springs from our mechanical facility, only increases our danger and will make more fatal the crash” (Lewis Mumford)
“We do not use technologies so much as live them” (Langdon Winner)
![Page 8: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Technology as a Political Phenomenon
Technological systems are not value neutral• interests of some are favored over interests
of others• if societies are to be equitable and effective,
we must understand (before they are introduced) the implications new technologies may have
• technologies are social products as well as social forces
![Page 9: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Langdon Winner
Faced with any proposal for a new technological system, citizens should examine the social contract implied by building the systems in a particular form. How well do the proposed conditions match our best sense of who we are and what we want this society to be? Who gains and who loses power in the proposed change? Are the conditions produced by the change compatible with equality, social justice and the common good? To nurture this process would require building institutions in which the claims of technical expertise and those of a democratic citizenry would regularly meet face to face...
![Page 10: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Inquiry
How should communities organize inquiry in order to promote their collective values?• epistemic significance• collective research and homogeneity
What is the collective good that inquiry should promote?• Integrated individual preferences
![Page 11: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Well-Ordered Science
Well-ordered science should satisfy preferences of the citizens in the society in which it is practiced
Vulgar democracy as well-ordered science?• but preferences are often based on impulse
or ignorance• emphasizes short-term benefits and pursuit
of what’s hot now
![Page 12: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Three Phases of Ideal Inquiry
Assignment of resources Efficient pursuit of projects, subject
to moral constraints Application of results
![Page 13: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Ideal Procedures
Exchange information Consider how possible inquiries might bear on previous
goals or research List (and weight) outcomes that inquiry should promote Recognize opportunities for satisfying curiosity and for
practical intervention, long-term benefits and immediate pay-offs
Assess possibilities that inquiry will deliver desired outcomes (defer to “experts”)
Recognize that a particular way of pursuing inquiry will violate rights of some individual or group
![Page 14: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Concerns With Current Inquiry: Preferences
Preferences of large segments of the public are consistently ignored• women, children, minorities, developing
countries• initial decision to favor the interests of one
group may be self-perpetuating (the pill)
![Page 15: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Concerns With Current Inquiry: Information
Misinformation or lack of information leads to neglect of real problems• areas of science that depend heavily on
public funding can be shaped by governmental decisions that respond to widespread ignorance (AIDS)
• misleading accounts of what can be expected introduce political constraints (biotech)
![Page 16: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Concerns With Current Inquiry: Parochialism
Parochial application does not properly aggregate or leverage inquiry• apply technologies we already have to new
problems• develop new technologies to fulfill the same
function more efficiently
![Page 17: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
What is the place of scientific research in a twentieth century
democracy?
Science - the Endless FrontierVannevar Bush, 1945
![Page 18: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Watershed of WWII: Changes in Federal Research
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
19
35
19
62
Federal Share of NationalR&D Expenditures
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1935 1962
Agricultural Research as a Shareof Federal R&DDefense, Space and Atomic Energyas a Share of Federal R&D
![Page 19: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Roosevelt’s Letter to Bush November 20, 1944 (1)
WWII has effectively organized the nation’s scientific talent and directed research towards immediate practical needs
Bush is the director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development which “represents a unique experiment of teamwork and cooperation in coordinating scientific research and in applying existing scientific knowledge to the solution of the technical problems paramount in war... “
![Page 20: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Roosevelt’s Letter to Bush November 20, 1944 (2)
FDR advocates peacetime use of the information, techniques, and research experience developed by OSRD
For “the improvement of the national health, the creation of new enterprises bringing new jobs, and the betterment of the national standard of living”
![Page 21: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Roosevelt’s Letter to Bush Four Key Questions
How can government promote and aid in scientific research in public and private institutions?
How can the nation organize research programs and continue the major wartime advances against disease?
How can we better foster the education and training of scientific talent in America’s youth?
Within the bounds of national security, how should American disseminate the store of scientific knowledge developed during the war?
![Page 22: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Science: the Endless FrontierJuly 5, 1945
“We have no national policy for science… the government has only begun to utilize science in the nation’s welfare. There is no body within the government charged with formatting or executing a national science policy… Science has been in the wings. It should be brought to the center of the stage -- for in it lies most of our hope in the future…”
![Page 23: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Perspectives
Value of inquiry for a wide range of public concerns
vs. Protect science from outside direction
and interference• importance of basic research
![Page 24: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Importance of Basic Research
In the war against disease For national security For public welfare
• economic growth• full employment
![Page 25: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Key Premises About Basic Research (1)
Performed without thought of practical ends• results in knowledge and an understanding
of nature and its laws Pacemaker of technical progress
• creates the fund from which the practical applications of knowledge is drawn
Intrinsic value of basic discovery • culture progress?
![Page 26: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Key Premises About Basic Research (2)
“A nation that depends upon others for its new basic scientific knowledge will be slow in its industrial progress”
Colleges and universities are uniquely qualified to carry on basic research• tradition and special characteristics
![Page 27: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Key Premises About Basic Research (3)
“We cannot expect industry to adequately fill the gap.”• Industry will fully rise to the challenge of
applying new knowledge to new products. The commercial incentive can be relied upon for that.
• But basic research is essentially non-commercial in nature. It will not receive the attention it requires if left to industry.
![Page 28: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Busk-Kilgore Debate (1)
Kilgore: federal funding for research should be more directive• address social problems• attempt to equitably distribute benefits of
science and technology• political accountability
![Page 29: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Busk-Kilgore Debate (2)
Bush: scientists as the best judges• disinterested pursuit of fundamental
questions as best policy for long-term results
• whatever people want from research, basic research is the most effective way of providing it
• autonomy of scientists (university as centerpiece)
![Page 30: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Result
“Scientists are left free to pursue their own curiosity but are saddled with the task of advertising their research as potentially satisfying individuals’ preferences”• manipulation of public funding• suspicious outsiders
![Page 31: Science Policy and Social, Economic and Cultural Change](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814706550346895db44029/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Linear Model of Innovation
Basic research
Applied research
Development
Design
Production
Marketing
INPUTS OUTPUTSPROCESS