SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

50
SCIENCE OF NUTRITION SCIENCE OF NUTRITION Science Study of nutrients in food How body uses nutrients

description

SCIENCE OF NUTRITION. Science Study of nutrients in food How body uses nutrients. CAUSES OF DEATH. FACTORS. FOOD CHOICES. Personal preference Habit Ethnic heritage or tradition Social interaction Availability, convenience Positive, negative associations Emotions Values - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

Page 1: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

SCIENCE OF NUTRITIONSCIENCE OF NUTRITIONScienceStudy of nutrients in foodHow body uses nutrients

Page 2: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

CAUSES OF DEATHCAUSES OF DEATH

Page 3: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

FACTORSFACTORS

Page 4: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

FOOD CHOICESFOOD CHOICES Personal preference Habit Ethnic heritage or tradition Social interaction Availability, convenience Positive, negative associations Emotions Values Body weight and image Nutrition

Page 5: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

NUTRIENTSNUTRIENTSObtained from foodUsed in the body for: > regulating growth > maintaining body tissues > repairing body tissues

Page 6: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

SIX CLASSES OF NUTRIENTSSIX CLASSES OF NUTRIENTS CARBOHYDRATES…….4 CAL/GRAM PROTEIN…………………4 CAL/GRAM FAT……………………….9 CAL/GRAM VITAMINS MINERALS WATER

ALCOHOL = 7 CAL/GRAM

Page 7: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

ELEMENTS IN THE NUTRIENTSELEMENTS IN THE NUTRIENTS

Page 8: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

EVALUATION OF NUTRITION EVALUATION OF NUTRITION INFORMATIONINFORMATION

Page 9: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

WHO SAID ITWHO SAID IT Check credentials, background, education-

degree of reliability RD, LD BS focus on science 900 clinical hours National registration exam Licensure according to each state Continuing education

Page 10: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

MOTIVE?MOTIVE?Scientific truth Refereed journal Reputable Professional Journals Articles screened by panel of

experts/peers Sensationalism Profit

Page 11: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

WHAT IS EXPERIENCE?WHAT IS EXPERIENCE? Human Nutrition? Evidence Scientific studies Testimonials NOT acceptable Uncontrolled experiment NOT acceptable Look at: Placebo effect Population studied Blind, double blind, random,

Page 12: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION
Page 13: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

BEWARE OF CLAIMSBEWARE OF CLAIMS Poor diet claimed as cause of most disease Conspiracy of medical community Normal foods are “bad” Exaggerated promises

Page 14: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

RESPONSIBILITYRESPONSIBILITY

Author?Publisher ?Editor?Bookstore owner? READER IS RESPONSIBLE!! THAT’S YOU!

Page 15: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

OBTAIN RELIABLE OBTAIN RELIABLE INFORMATIONINFORMATION

American Medical AssociationAmerican Academy of PediatricsAmerican Dietetic AssociationAmerican Heart AssociationAmerican Cancer SocietyAmerican Diabetes AssociationDairy and Nutrition Council

Page 16: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

GOVERNMENTGOVERNMENTLocal Health DepartmentCooperative Extension ProgramsNational Academy of SciencesFDA

Page 17: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

Role of Health ProfessionalRole of Health Professional Examine evidence – risk vs benefits Give best advice based on scientific evidence Don’t make promises Food alone cannot make a person healthy Keep open mind – update Translate guidelines into food – what to eat, what to limit

Page 18: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

Dietary Reference IntakesDietary Reference Intakes DRI committee Develops framework for recommendations Set of nutrient intake values for HEALTHY

people in the US and Canada Values are used for planning and assessing

diets

Page 19: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

TERMSTERMS

Page 20: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

DRI - TERMSDRI - TERMS

Page 21: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

ESTIMATED AVERAGE ESTIMATED AVERAGE REQUIREMENTREQUIREMENT

Amount of nutrient that will maintain specific biochemical or physiological function in half the people of given age and sex group

Criteria for each nutrient based on the role it performs – used to set RDA

Page 22: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

RECOMMENDED DIETARY RECOMMENDED DIETARY ALLOWANCESALLOWANCES

Recommended intake – NOT required, NOT minimum

Standards for good nutritionAverage daily amount of nutrient

considered adequate to meet known nutrient needs of all HEALTHY PEOPLE

Page 23: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

RDAsRDAs Designed for groups Most nutrient levels higher than

average Divided into age groups, gender after

age 10

Page 24: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

USES OF RDAsUSES OF RDAsAssess adequacy of dietsPlan diets for groupsStandard to evaluate nutritional

statusMost appropriate for populations –

individuals over a period of time

Page 25: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

SETTING RDAsSETTING RDAs

Page 26: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

ENERGY RDAENERGY RDA

Page 27: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

NAÏVE VS ACCURATE VIEWNAÏVE VS ACCURATE VIEW

Page 28: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

RDAs - LIMITATIONSRDAs - LIMITATIONSNo RDA for every nutrientFood analyses differNot user friendly for publicNo data for fiber, cholesterol, fat

Page 29: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION
Page 30: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

ADEQUATE INTAKEADEQUATE INTAKE

Average amount of a nutrient that appears sufficient to maintain a specific criterion

Insufficient scientific data to establish EAR

Page 31: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

Tolerable Upper Intake LevelsTolerable Upper Intake LevelsMaximum daily amount of a nutrient

that appears safe for most healthy people

Above this level may be toxic

Page 32: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

Dietary Guidelines 2005Dietary Guidelines 2005 Adequate nutrients within calorie need Weight management Physical activity Food groups to encourage Fats Carbohydrates Sodium and potassium Alcoholic beverages Food safety

Page 33: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

KEY RECOMMENDATIONSKEY RECOMMENDATIONSWithin each category

recommendations for specific populations

Page 34: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

FOOD GUIDE PYRAMIDFOOD GUIDE PYRAMID Visual representation of USDAs

Dietary Guidelines Number of servings that are right for

you depends on how many calories you need age, gender, size, activity

Page 35: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

2005 PYRAMID2005 PYRAMID

Page 36: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

Food Composition TablesFood Composition Tables Average nutrient values based on lab

analysis of food samples Advantages; convenient, cheap, available NUTRIENT DENSITY Disadvantage: Limited data Uncommon or ethnic foods not included BIOAVAILABILITY – in a form body can use

or available for use

Page 37: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

NUTRIENT DENSITYNUTRIENT DENSITY

Page 38: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

DIET BASICSDIET BASICS Variety Moderation Balance of intake and output Guidelines for fat and carbohydrate Below 1200 calories – can’t supply

adequate micronutrients Below 45 grams of protein – can’t supply

essential amino acids

Page 39: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

Food LabelsFood Labels

Daily values- based on 2000 calories and current nutrition recommendations

Fat = <30% of total calories Saturated Fat = <10% of total calories CHO = 55-60% of total calories Pro = 10 – 15% of total calories Fiber = 12 grams/ 1000 calories

Page 40: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

Food Labels - ContinuedFood Labels - Continued Maximums : Total Fat Saturated Fat Cholesterol Sodium Minimums Total Carbohydrates Fiber

Page 41: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

DAILY VALUESDAILY VALUESTo show how a food fits into daily

patternPercent of nutrient or food component2000 calories for women, children up

to age 11, and older adults2500 calories for men, pregnant

women, children over 11 years of age

Page 42: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

DAILY VALUESDAILY VALUESWatch total fat intakeCalories from fat / total kcals = if

more than 30% or 1/3 “WARNING”Required nutrients: vitamins A & C,

Minerals: iron and calciumDo DRVs apply to everyone?

Page 43: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

APPROVED CLAIMSAPPROVED CLAIMS Calcium and osteoporosis Fats and cancer Saturated fats, cholesterol and heart disease Fiber containing fruits, vegetables, and grains and

cancer Sodium and hypertension Fruits and vegetables and cancer Folate or folic acid and neural tube defects Oat bran or oatmeal and reduced risk of heart

disease

Page 44: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION
Page 45: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

FOOD LABELSFOOD LABELSMandatory vs voluntary statements

on the labelDefinition of terms

Page 46: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

LABEL DEFINITIONSLABEL DEFINITIONS

Page 47: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

LABEL DEFINITIONSLABEL DEFINITIONS

Page 48: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

Food PatternsFood Patterns Food energy: 3500 cals (1909) 3800 cals

(1994) /capita/day Carbohydrates: > Percent of cals 57% (1909)52% (1994) > Drop in use of grains and white potatoes > Per capita consumption of sweeteners steadily increasing (aspartame ^ in 1981)

Page 49: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

Eating PatternsEating Patterns Protein: > Sources changed – animal and plant equal in 1909, animal sources in 1994 > Red meat down, poultry up, fish up slightly > Shell egg consumption down used in

pastas, etc > Use of dairy products down

Page 50: SCIENCE OF NUTRITION

Eating PatternsEating Patterns Fat: > Percent of calories: 32% in 190936% (1989)38%(1994) > Shift from animal to vegetable fat sources > Marked increase in low-fat and nonfat milk (54% decline in whole milk) Vitamins – per capita consumption above RDA

for A, C, E, thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, B6, B12, folate

Calcium-Levels peaked in 1946, still below RDA