Science and Technology Directorate MSFC 1 MSFC Business Base Forecast Science and Technology...

1

Science and Technology Directorate MSFC

MSFC Business Base ForecastScience and Technology Directorate

Dr. Ann F. Whitaker

Director: Dr. Ann F. Whitaker Organization: XD01Date: March 25, 2005

2


Science and Technology DirectorateBusiness Base Detail

Author: Dr. Ann WhitakerOrganization: XD01Date: March 25, 2005

3


Business Base ForecastGroundrules and Assumptions

* ESMD formation signaled a decrease in emphasis on traditional science activities resulting in stretch outs to existing programs and delays in new starts * Less directed work in Agency and nearly all work awarded through competition, difficult to obtain adequate full costs from R&A programs* After Center reorganization in December 2004, former XD hardware project dollars and FTEs now accountable in SSPPO* Earth Science and Space Science projects are selected competitively with peer reviews every 2 to 3 years* FY04 new business forecast included postponed program (EUSO) and opportunities (Explorer) - not reasonable to compare FY04 and FY05.* No Explorer AO bids in this package (Other potential opportunities exist but release dates are TBD)* PRL aggressively seeking new work; currently working IR&D (CDDF) activities* SOMTC aggressively seeking new work (Shuttle, DARPA, etc.)* Some Microgravity areas planned in last year’s Business Forecast have been dropped, e.g., Lunar Activity

4


Business Base ForecastFY05 Revenue Forecast – Known In-Guide Funding

Prob ofFY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 Total Occurence

Science & Technology Summary 88338 82106 82007 79518 74028 65734 471731

Research Planning & Integration XD04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Earth & Planetary Science Branch – XD11 10776 7705 7705 7447 7480 0 41113 Earth-Sun System Research & Applied Sciences NRAs10660 7589 7589 7331 7364 0 40533 100%TCSP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Applied Sciences Program Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0GPM & follow-on to TRMM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Science Mission Directorate Applied Sciences NRAs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TAPeS & LCC and Launch Operations & Recovery 116 116 116 116 116 0 580 50%GOES-R, GOES-R3, ESSP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LIS & TRMM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Space Science Branch – XD12 2979 2382 1457 1285 1285 341 9729 Cassini and Cosmic Lunar Dust 308 307 328 341 341 341 1966 75%/25%Universe Theme (Integral/HERO, Others) 1340 1108 219 0 0 0 2667 100% through FY07/50%

Sun Earth Research 1331 967 910 944 944 0 5096

Propulsion Research Center - XD20 1511 0 0 0 0 0 1511Ionic Liquids for Melt Castable Munitions 50 0 0 0 0 0 50 100%Ionic Liquids for New Lubricants 12 0 0 0 0 0 12 100%New Energetic Ionic Liquids 50 0 0 0 0 0 50 100%Magnetic Nozzle Detachment 679 0 0 0 0 0 679 100%Test Platform Analysis 207 0 0 0 0 0 207 100%High Energy Monopropellants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Advanced Lithiumn Lorentz Force Accelerator 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 >90%Gallium Electromagnetic Thruster 413 0 0 0 0 0 413 100%Busek Bismuth Hall Thruster 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$K

5


Business Base ForecastFY05 Revenue Forecast – Known In-Guide Funding (cont’d)


Science & Technology Summary (continued)

Space Optics Manufacturing and Technology Center – XD30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Small Chamber 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LASSO 0 0 0 0 0 0 030 Meter Telescope Mirror Coatings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Terrestrial Planet Finder 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Stellar Imager Formation Flyer Test Bed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Con X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Ground Lens Sensor Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BAE Systems 0 0 0 0 0 0 0ET-ICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Silicon Carbide Processing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0JWST 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Thin Disk Laser 0 0 0 0 0 0 0SAFIR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0WAVE II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Exploration Science and Technology Division – XD40 73072 72019 72845 70786 65263 65393 419378MSG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Advanced Material for Exploration 1438 1900 1976 2055 2137 2223 11729 100%AIM 1735 1855 1884 1938 1930 1968 11310 100%MSRR 13526 8425 4239 3966 4020 4181 38357 100%LOCAD 6130 6350 6070 5829 6589 6853 37821 100%ISRU 9346 10562 10559 10742 8994 9354 59557 100%Divisional Support 15500 15950 15758 13644 8915 7156 76923 100%Radiation Shielding 25397 26977 32359 32612 32678 33658 183681 100%

$K

6


Business Base ForecastFY05 - Revenue Forecast – Probable Funding



Research Planning & Integration XD04 974 867 897 949 950 990 5627 >90%

Earth & Planetary Science Branch – XD11 1644 1674 0 0 0 0 3318 Earth-Sun System Research & Applied Sciences NRAs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TCSP 1060 1071 0 0 0 0 2131 100% (3/14/05)

Applied Sciences Program Support 584 603 0 0 0 0 1187 >90%GPM & follow-on to TRMM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Science Mission Directorate Applied Sciences NRAs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TAPeS & LCC and Launch Operations & Recovery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0GOES-R, GOES-R3, ESSP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LIS & TRMM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Space Science Branch – XD12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cassini and Cosmic Lunar Dust 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Universe Theme (Integral/HERO, Others) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Sun Earth Research 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Propulsion Research Center - XD20 8 1103 990 0 0 0 2101Ionic Liquids for Melt Castable Munitions 0 50 0 0 0 0 50 100%Ionic Liquids for New Lubricants 0 25 25 0 0 0 50 100%New Energetic Ionic Liquids 0 50 0 0 0 0 50 100%Magnetic Nozzle Detachment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Test Platform Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0High Energy Monopropellants 8 0 0 0 0 0 8Advanced Lithiumn Lorentz Force Accelerator 0 100 0 0 0 0 100 >90%Gallium Electromagnetic Thruster 0 878 965 0 0 0 1843 >90%Busek Bismuth Hall Thruster 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$K

7


Business Base ForecastFY05 - Revenue Forecast – Probable Funding (cont’d)



Space Optics Manufacturing and Technology Center – XD30 5051 501 373 426 426 426 7203Small Chamber 30 33 37 40 40 40 220 80<90%LASSO 114 0 0 0 0 0 114 25%30 Meter Telescope Mirror Coatings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Terrestrial Planet Finder 25 25 250 300 300 300 1200 >90%Stellar Imager Formation Flyer Test Bed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50%Con X 86 86 86 86 86 86 516 25%Ground Lens Sensor Development 893 0 0 0 0 0 893 >90%BAE Systems 0 0 0 0 0 0 0ET-ICE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Silicon Carbide Processing 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 75%JWST 2803 0 0 0 0 0 2803 >90%Thin Disk Laser 0 0 0 0 0 0 0SAFIR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0WAVE II 1000 357 0 0 0 0 1357 80<90%

Exploration Science and Technology Division – XD40 1164 1442 1490 1547 1599 276 7518MSG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Advanced Materal for Exploration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0AIM 1164 1442 1490 1547 1599 276 7518 100%MSRR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LOCAD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0ISRU 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Divisional Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Radiation Shielding 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

$K

8


Business Base ForecastFY05 - Revenue Forecast – Possible Funding

FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 Total Occurence


Research Planning & Integration XD04 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Earth & Planetary Science Branch – XD11 1050 7900 7900 5800 2150 2650 27450 Earth-Sun System Research & Applied Sciences NRAs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0TCSP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Applied Sciences Program Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0GPM & follow-on to TRMM 0 500 500 500 500 500 2500 75%Science Mission Directorate Applied Sciences NRAs 500 500 500 500 0 500 2500 50-75%TAPeS & LCC and Launch Operations & Recovery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0GOES-R, GOES-R3, ESSP 550 5400 5400 3300 1650 1650 17950 25%LIS & TRMM 0 1500 1500 1500 0 0 4500 25%

Space Science Branch – XD12 6569 6911 8144 8311 7556 381 37872 Cassini and Cosmic Lunar Dust 337 347 362 381 381 381 2189 75%/25%Universe Theme (Integral/HERO, Others) 2395 2716 3676 3750 2995 0 15532 100% through FY07/50%

Sun Earth Research 3837 3848 4106 4180 4180 0 20151

Propulsion Research Center - XD20 2500 7700 10500 10500 11500 12000 54700Ionic Liquids for Melt Castable Munitions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Ionic Liquids for New Lubricants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0New Energetic Ionic Liquids 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Magnetic Nozzle Detachment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Test Platform Analysis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0High Energy Monopropellants 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Advanced Lithiumn Lorentz Force Accelerator 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Gallium Electromagnetic Thruster 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Busek Bismuth Hall Thruster 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Propulsion R&T 2500 7700 10500 10500 11500 12000 54700

9


Business Base ForecastFY05 - Revenue Forecast – Possible Funding (cont’d)



Space Optics Manufacturing and Technology Center – XD30 1681 5364 5487 4095 4803 4343 25773Small Chamber 200 220 240 300 300 300 1560 80<90%LASSO 0 228 228 228 228 228 1140 25%30 Meter Telescope Mirror Coatings 0 385 343 237 239 242 1446 25%Terrestrial Planet Finder 0 75 500 600 600 600 2375 >90%Stellar Imager Formation Flyer Test Bed 100 100 TBD TBD TBD TBD 200 50%Con X 55 55 55 55 55 55 330 25%Ground Lens Sensor Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 0BAE Systems 400 400 0 0 0 0 800 50%ET-ICE 56 0 0 0 0 0 56 75%Silicon Carbide Processing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0JWST 0 2917 2318 479 301 308 6323 >90%Thin Disk Laser 870 984 1033 1326 1540 1654 7407 50%SAFIR 0 0 770 870 1540 956 4136 80<90%WAVE II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Exploration Science and Technology Division – XD40 28344 28903 30895 36488 42279 45362 212271MSG 12684 11923 11950 12370 12563 12939 74429 75%Advanced Material for Exploration 0 0 0 0 0 0 0AIM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0MSRR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0LOCAD 3900 3200 3200 4400 5000 5200 24900 75%ISRU 3310 3780 4470 4950 5330 6040 27880 ?Divisional Support 0 0 0 2718 7936 10508 21162 75%Radiation Shielding 8450 10000 11275 12050 11450 10675 63900 75%

10


Business Base ForecastFY05 - Civil Service Workforce Forecast – Known Civil Service

Prob ofFY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 Occurence

Science & Technology Summary 153.8 131.5 124.2 117.9 107.0 68.7

Research Planning & Integration XD04 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Earth & Planetary Science Branch – XD11 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 0.0 Earth-Sun System Research & Applied Sciences NRAs 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 0.0 100%TCSP 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Applied Sciences Program Support 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0GPM & follow-on to TRMM 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Science Mission Directorate Applied Sciences NRAs 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0TAPeS & LCC and Launch Operations & Recovery 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0GOES-R, GOES-R3, ESSP 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0LIS & TRMM 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Space Science Branch – XD12 9.8 7.9 5.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 Cassini and Cosmic Lunar Dust 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 75%/25%Universe Theme (Integral/HERO, Others) 4.3 3.6 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100% through FY07/50%

Sun Earth Research 4.5 3.3 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0

Propulsion Research Center - XD20 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Ionic Liquids for Melt Castable Munitions 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100%Ionic Liquids for New Lubricants 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100%New Energetic Ionic Liquids 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100%Magnetic Nozzle Detachment 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100%Test Platform Analysis 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100%High Energy Monopropellants 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Advanced Lithiumn Lorentz Force Accelerator 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 90%Gallium Electromagnetic Thruster 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 90%Busek Bismuth Hall Thruster 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100%

FTEs

11


Business Base ForecastFY05 - Civil Service Workforce Forecast – Known Civil Service (cont’d)



Space Optics Manufacturing and Technology Center – XD30 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Small Chamber 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0LASSO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.030 Meter Telescope Mirror Coatings 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Terrestrial Planet Finder 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Stellar Imager Formation Flyer Test Bed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Con X 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Ground Lens Sensor Development 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0BAE Systems 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0ET-ICE 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 75%Silicon Carbide Processing 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 75%JWST 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Thin Disk Laser 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0SAFIR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0WAVE II 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Exploration Science and Technology Division – XD40 110.6 91.6 87.2 81.9 71.0 67.7MSG 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Advanced Material for Exploration 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0AIM 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 100%MSRR 34.3 12.4 7.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 100%LOCAD 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 100%ISRU 18.2 21.2 22.2 22.2 19.2 19.2 100%Divisional Support 26.0 26.0 26.0 21.7 13.8 10.5 100%Radiation Shielding 19.8 19.8 19.8 19.8 19.8 19.8 100%

FTEs

12


Business Base ForecastFY05 - Civil Service Workforce Forecast – Probable CS



Research Planning & Integration XD04 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 >90%

Earth & Planetary Science Branch – XD11 4.6 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Earth-Sun System Research & Applied Sciences NRAs 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0TCSP 2.2 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100% (3/14/05)Applied Sciences Program Support 2.4 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 >90%GPM & follow-on to TRMM 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Science Mission Directorate Applied Sciences NRAs 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0TAPeS & LCC and Launch Operations & Recovery 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0GOES-R, GOES-R3, ESSP 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0LIS & TRMM 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Space Science Branch – XD12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cassini and Cosmic Lunar Dust 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Universe Theme (Integral/HERO, Others) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Sun Earth Research 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Propulsion Research Center - XD20 0.1 1.6 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0Ionic Liquids for Melt Castable Munitions 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100%Ionic Liquids for New Lubricants 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 100%New Energetic Ionic Liquids 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100%Magnetic Nozzle Detachment 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Test Platform Analysis 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0High Energy Monopropellants 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 >90%Advanced Lithiumn Lorentz Force Accelerator 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 >90%Gallium Electromagnetic Thruster 0.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 >90%Busek Bismuth Hall Thruster 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

FTEs

13


Business Base ForecastFY05 - Civil Service Workforce Forecast – Probable CS (cont’d)



Space Optics Manufacturing and Technology Center – XD30 27.2 6.0 7.8 8.8 9.8 7.8Small Chamber 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 80<90%LASSO 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25%30 Meter Telescope Mirror Coatings 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Terrestrial Planet Finder 0.1 0.3 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 >90%Stellar Imager Formation Flyer Test Bed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Con X 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 25%Ground Lens Sensor Development 3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 >90%BAE Systems 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0ET-ICE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Silicon Carbide Processing 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 75%JWST 16.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 >90%Thin Disk Laser 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 50%SAFIR 0.0 0.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 2.0 80<90%WAVE II 3.5 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 80<90%

Exploration Science and Technology Division – XD40 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.3 14.2 15.5MSG 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Advanced Material for Exploration 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0AIM 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 75%MSRR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0LOCAD 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0ISRU 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Divisional Support 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 12.2 15.5 75%Radiation Shielding 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

FTEs

14


Business Base ForecastFY05 - Civil Service Workforce Forecast – Possible CS

FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 Occurence



Earth & Planetary Science Branch – XD11 6.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 13.0 12.5 Earth-Sun System Research & Applied Sciences NRAs 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0TCSP 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Applied Sciences Program Support 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0GPM & follow-on to TRMM 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5Science Mission Directorate Applied Sciences NRAs 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0TAPeS & LCC and Launch Operations & Recovery 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0GOES-R, GOES-R3, ESSP 4.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0LIS & TRMM 0.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 0.0 0.0

Space Science Branch – XD12 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Cassini and Cosmic Lunar Dust 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Universe Theme (Integral/HERO, Others) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Sun Earth Research 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Propulsion Research Center - XD20 6.3 19.3 25.0 26.3 28.8 30.0Ionic Liquids for Melt Castable Munitions 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Ionic Liquids for New Lubricants 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0New Energetic Ionic Liquids 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Magnetic Nozzle Detachment 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Test Platform Analysis 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0High Energy Monopropellants 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Advanced Lithiumn Lorentz Force Accelerator 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Gallium Electromagnetic Thruster 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Busek Bismuth Hall Thruster 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Propulsion R&T 6.3 19.3 25.0 26.3 28.8 30.0

15


Business Base ForecastFY05 - Civil Service Workforce Forecast – Possible CS (cont’d)



Space Optics Manufacturing and Technology Center – XD30 4.9 24.5 23.2 15.0 18.0 14.0Small Chamber 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 80<90%LASSO 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 25%30 Meter Telescope Mirror Coatings 0.0 0.9 0.8 0.3 0.3 0.3Terrestrial Planet Finder 0.0 0.5 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 >90%Stellar Imager Formation Flyer Test Bed 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Con X 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 25%Ground Lens Sensor Development 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0BAE Systems 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0ET-ICE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Silicon Carbide Processing 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0JWST 0.0 16.2 12.2 2.5 1.5 1.5 >90%Thin Disk Laser 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 50%SAFIR 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 6.0 2.0 80<90%WAVE II 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Exploration Science and Technology Division – XD40 48.1 48.8 49.2 52.0 53.0 47.5MSG 19.3 17.6 16.0 15.5 15.5 15.5 75%Advanced Material for Exploration 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0AIM 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0MSRR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0LOCAD 3.6 2.0 2.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 75%ISRU 5.5 6.5 8.0 8.5 7.5 8.0 ?Divisional Support 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Radiation Shielding 19.7 22.7 23.2 24.0 25.0 19.0 75%

FTEs

16


Business Base ForecastFY05 - Contractor Workforce Forecast – Total WorkYears



Research Planning & Integration XD04 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 >90%

Earth & Planetary Science Branch – XD11 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 0.0 Earth-Sun System Research & Applied Sciences NRAs 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 100%TCSP 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Applied Sciences Program Support 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0GPM & follow-on to TRMM 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Science Mission Directorate Applied Sciences NRAs 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0TAPeS & LCC and Launch Operations & Recovery 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0GOES-R, GOES-R3, ESSP 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0LIS & TRMM 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 25%

Space Science Branch – XD12 4.3 4.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Solar System Exploration 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ?Universe Theme 1.8 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ?Sun Earth Research 2.5 2.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 ?

Propulsion Research Center - XD20 2.1 1.1 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Ionic Liquids for Melt Castable Munitions 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Ionic Liquids for New Lubricants 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0New Energetic Ionic Liquids 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Magnetic Nozzle Detachment 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100%Test Platform Analysis 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0High Energy Monopropellants 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Advanced Lithiumn Lorentz Force Accelerator 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 >90%Gallium Electromagnetic Thruster 0.5 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 >90%Busek Bismuth Hall Thruster 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

17


Business Base ForecastFY05 - Contractor Workforce Forecast – Total WorkYears (cont’d)



Space Optics Manufacturing and Technology Center – XD30 5.4 4.1 5.3 6.6 9.6 10.6Small Chamber 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0LASSO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.030 Meter Telescope Mirror Coatings 0.0 0.7 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 25%Terrestrial Planet Finder 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Stellar Imager Formation Flyer Test Bed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Con X 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 25%Ground Lens Sensor Development 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 >90%BAE Systems 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50%ET-ICE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Silicon Carbide Processing 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0JWST 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 >90%Thin Disk Laser 1.0 1.0 3.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 50%SAFIR 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 2.0 80<90%WAVE II 0.8 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 80<90%

Exploration Science and Technology Division – XD40 131.2 123.7 115.6 113.1 115.9 102.6MSG 31.6 31.4 31.3 31.3 31.3 31.3 75%Advanced Materal for Exploration 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 100%AIM 9.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.0 100%MSRR 18.3 12.2 6.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 100%LOCAD 19.2 16.5 13.3 13.3 18.6 19.6 75%ISRU 25.8 26.3 27.3 25.8 23.3 12.0 100%Divisional Support 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.8 75%Radiation Shielding 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 75%

18


Business Base ForecastRevenue Summary

FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11

Research Planning & Integration XD04 974 867 897 949 950 990 FY05 Business Base Forecast, In-Guideline Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Probable Funding 974 867 897 949 950 990 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Possible Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0

Earth & Planetary Science Branch – XD11 32556 35865 34807 32439 27312 4094 FY05 Business Base Forecast, In-Guideline Funding 10766 7705 7705 7447 7480 0 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Probable Funding 1644 1674 0 0 0 0 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Possible Funding 1050 7900 7900 5800 2150 2650

Space Science Branch – XD12 9548 9293 9601 9596 8841 722 FY05 Business Base Forecast, In-Guideline Funding 2979 2382 1457 1285 1285 341 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Probable Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Possible Funding 6569 6911 8144 8311 7556 381

Propulsion Research Center - XD20 4019 8803 11490 10500 11500 12000 FY05 Business Base Forecast, In-Guideline Funding 1511 0 0 0 0 0 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Probable Funding 8 1103 990 0 0 0 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Possible Funding 2500 7700 10500 10500 11500 12000

Space Optics Manufacturing and Technology Center – XD30 6732 5865 5860 4521 5229 4769 FY05 Business Base Forecast, In-Guideline Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Probable Funding 5051 501 373 426 426 426 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Possible Funding 1681 5364 5487 4095 4803 4343

Exploration Science and Technology Division – XD40 102580 102364 105230 108821 109141 111031 FY05 Business Base Forecast, In-Guideline Funding 73072 72019 72845 70786 65263 65393 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Probable Funding 1164 1442 1490 1547 1599 276 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Possible Funding 28344 28903 30895 36488 42279 45362

$K

19


Business Base ForecastFTE Summary


Research Planning & Integration XD04 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FY05 Business Base Forecast, In-Guideline FTEs 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Probable FTEs 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Possible FTEs 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Earth & Planetary Science Branch – XD11 43.1 52.1 47.5 47.5 45.0 12.5 FY05 Business Base Forecast, In-Guideline FTEs 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 0.0 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Probable FTEs 4.6 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Possible FTEs 6.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 13.0 12.5

Space Science Branch – XD12 9.8 7.9 5.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 FY05 Business Base Forecast, In-Guideline FTEs 9.8 7.9 5.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Probable FTEs 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Possible FTEs 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Propulsion Research Center - XD20 11.1 20.9 26.1 26.3 28.8 30.0 FY05 Business Base Forecast, In-Guideline FTEs 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Probable FTEs 0.1 1.6 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Possible FTEs 6.3 19.3 25.0 26.3 28.8 30.0

Space Optics Manufacturing and Technology Center – XD30 33.5 30.5 31.0 23.8 27.8 21.8 FY05 Business Base Forecast, In-Guideline FTEs 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Probable FTEs 27.2 6.0 7.8 8.8 9.8 7.8 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Possible FTEs 4.9 24.5 23.2 15.0 18.0 14.0

Exploration Science and Technology Division – XD40 160.7 142.4 138.4 140.2 138.2 130.7 FY05 Business Base Forecast, In-Guideline FTEs 110.6 91.6 87.2 81.9 71.0 67.7 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Probable FTEs 2.0 2.0 2.0 6.3 14.2 15.5 FY05 Business Base Forecast, Possible FTEs 48.1 48.8 49.2 52.0 53.0 47.5

20


Business Base ForecastFY05 WYE Summary



Earth & Planetary Science Branch – XD11 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.0 0.0

Space Science Branch – XD12 4.3 4.3 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0

Propulsion Research Center - XD20 2.1 1.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0

Space Optics Manufacturing and Technology Center – XD30 5.4 4.1 5.3 6.6 9.6 10.6

Exploration Science and Technology Division – XD40 131.2 123.7 115.6 113.1 115.9 102.6

21



Research Planning & Integration Office - XD04

Organization: XD04Author: Betty GrishamProgram Manager: Richard BeranekDate: March 22, 2005

22


Assumptions:• Budget estimate reflects full cost estimate • Estimates validated by CFO

Business Initiative: XD04 Science and Technology Education Outreach

Description of Initiative (All current and evolvingDescription of Initiative (All current and evolvingPrograms/projects/activities) (Direct & Corp. G&A)Programs/projects/activities) (Direct & Corp. G&A)

Benefits to Doing the WorkBenefits to Doing the Work

Budget – (In Full Cost)Budget – (In Full Cost)Key Milestones we commit to with the BudgetKey Milestones we commit to with the Budget

Brief Description• The MSFC/ESMD Education office will develop products and workshops to

enhance the knowledge of human space exploration as related to science, technology, engineering, and mathematics to include K-12 classrooms, undergraduate, graduate, and post-doctoral students.

Classification: Directed____ or Competitive__X___. Capture Manager: Richard BeranekBus. Dev. Point of Contact: Betty GrishamCustomer Point of Contact: Betty GrishamPartnerships: Universities and MuseumsProbability of Occurrence:

Known ____ Probable(>90%)_X___

Probable (80<90%) ____ Possible % _____(10,25,50 or 75%)

$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0

Probable Funding 974 867 897 949 950 990Known In-guide Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Funding 974 867 897 949 950 990Known Civil Service 0 0 0 0 0 0Probable Civil Service 1.8 0 0 0 0 0Possible CS 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Civil Service 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8Contractor WorkYears 4 4 4 4 4 4

Existing programs: (XD04 ESMD Education): ▪ ECLSS Student Engineering Design Challenge▪ Remote Controlled Moon Dozer Activity in support of

2005 Great Moonbuggy Race▪e-Lectures concept development

Future Programs:▪Jacksonville State e-Lectures course Spring 2006▪Enhance Remote Controlled Moon Dozer for FIRST

Robotic Competition ▪Develop Informal Education Saturation Outreach

CampaignsCustomers: NASA HQ’s/MSFC ESMD; NASA HQ’s/MSFC Academic Affairs, NASA HQ’s/MSFC Public Affairs; MSFC ECLSS Office; Huntsville U. S. Space and Rocket Center; McWane Science Center; Memphis Children’s Museum; Jacksonville State University

02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

OSP

Engineering Design ChallengesEngineering Design Challenges

Fund Center – WBS (contact CFO if help required):

Foundation of Projection:Source of Funding:

Include Direct Civil Service only. CFO will load indirect Civil ServiceEstimate for this 1st submit should be +/- 10%

University e-Lectures CourseUniversity e-Lectures Course

ESMD Workshops and Hands-On Activity ExhibitsESMD Workshops and Hands-On Activity Exhibits

23


Equipment

N/A

Etc.

N/A

Business Initiative: Center Requirements

WorkforceWorkforce Facilities - ChangesFacilities - Changes

Other RequirementsOther Requirements Other Key Drivers As ApplicableOther Key Drivers As ApplicableEnvironmentalEnvironmental:: Products are approved via ESMD Products are approved via ESMD advisors and NASA Strategic Communication advisors and NASA Strategic Communication PoliciesPolicies

PoliticalPolitical: Collaboration with other NASA Science : Collaboration with other NASA Science Education offices at GRC, KSC, JSC, and AMESEducation offices at GRC, KSC, JSC, and AMES

CompetitionCompetition: Other NASA Centers: Other NASA CentersPast Capture RatePast Capture Rate: 60%: 60%

Link to Agency Strategic PlanLink to Agency Strategic Plan: Our products are linked : Our products are linked to ESMD Guiding Principles and ESMD Education Goalsto ESMD Guiding Principles and ESMD Education Goals

Link to Center Core Capability/MissionLink to Center Core Capability/Mission: Manufacturing : Manufacturing (ISFAR) (ISFAR)

Competency Need Dates Availability New Rqmt.

(CS/Cont.)Education ProgramsAnd Technologies Spring 2005 Spring 2005 No

Workforce Development/Training Requirements:

None

Building Need Dates Available New Rqmt. Space Type:

4201-5 offices Spring 05 Spring 05 No

Special Test Facilities/Equipment:

MSFC ECLSS Labs; MSFC Educator Resource Center located at the U.S. Space and Rocket Center; MSFC Communications/UNITeS Audio Visual Information Services

Response Status:

Inwork:_______ Submitted: ________ Other: ______

24



Earth & Planetary Science Branch – XD11

Organization: XD11Author: Cheryl ErdnerProgram Manager: Dr. Steven J. Goodman Date: March 25, 2005

25


Assumptions: Budget based on SMD Guidelines

Business Initiative: Earth Science On-Going Work

Description of Initiative (All current and evolvingDescription of Initiative (All current and evolvingPrograms/projects/activities) (Direct & Corp. Programs/projects/activities) (Direct & Corp. G&A)G&A)


Budget – (In Full Cost)Budget – (In Full Cost) Key Milestones we commit to with the BudgetKey Milestones we commit to with the Budget

Earth Science On-Going Work

Classification: Directed __ or Competitive X with some directed Capture Manager: Steve GoodmanBus. Dev Point of Contact: Steve GoodmanCustomer Point of Contact: ESSD/SMD/Jack Kaye, Ron BirkPartnerships: NASA Ctrs, Universities, other Federal AgenciesProbability of Occurrence: Known X _ Probable (>90%) __Probable (80<90%) __ Possible % __ (10,25,50 or 75%)

Existing systems:

Enable any future system:

Customers:


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11Possible FundingProbable FundingKnown In-guide Funding 10,660 7,589 7,589 7,331 7,364 0Total Funding 10,660 7,589 7,589 7,331 7,364 0Known Civil Service 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 0.0Probable Civil ServicePossible Civil ServiceTotal Civil Service 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Contractor WorkYears 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0

Foundation of Projection: Congressional BudgetSource of Funding: WBS’ 62-428/ -622/ -291/ -621/ -613/ -895/ 6251-667

Earth-Sun System Research NRAs, including EOS Mission scienceClimate Variability - Energy & Water Cycle

- Weather - Landscape Dynamics

Applied Sciences NRAs, CANsPublic Health Ecological Forecasting

NASA National Objective #5-study the Earth from spaceNASA Strategic Objectives #6-RTF, #13-E&PO, #14-Earth Sys Science, #15-Sun’s Earth Sys, #16-International Partners, #18-Commercial Partners

ESSP, HYDROS, GPM, NPOESS/NPP, GOES-R

NASA HQS/MSFC/KSC/JSC

NOAA, EPA, OSTP

Various International for TRMM/LIS, SERVIR projects

Peer reviewed journal articles

Mission science (algorithms, data products, E&PO)

Conference presentations and workshop reports

26




Other RequirementsOther Requirements Other Key Drivers As ApplicableOther Key Drivers As ApplicableEnvironmental:Environmental: Role of Scientists at NASA, Full Cost, Vision Role of Scientists at NASA, Full Cost, Vision for Space Explorationfor Space Exploration

Political:Political: Congress interest in retaining Earth Science, Congress interest in retaining Earth Science, EarmarksEarmarks

Competition:Competition: Other NASA, University researchersOther NASA, University researchers

Past Capture Rate:Past Capture Rate: 70%70%

Link to Agency Strategic Plan:Link to Agency Strategic Plan:•NASA Strategic Objectives #6, #13-16, #18

Link to Center Core Capability/Mission:Link to Center Core Capability/Mission:Scientific Research and Instrument DevelopmentScientific Research and Instrument Development

Competency Need Dates Availability New Rqmt

(CS/Cont.)

Tech Work & Team Mgt FY05-11 CS NoEarth Atmosphere FY05-11 CS & Cont. NoEarth Sci Appl Research FY05-11 CS & Cont. NoRemote Sensing Technology FY05-11 CS & Cont. No

Workforce Development/Training Requirements:APPL SE/ PM classes for Certification



Response Status:


Equipment

Etc.

27


EARTH SCIENCE NEW WORK

28


EARTH SCIENCE NEW WORK SUMMARY

$ K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 TOTAL

NEW WORK SUMMARYFunding 2,810 9,690 8,016 5,916 2,766 2,650 31,848Civil Service 11.1 20.1 15.5 15.5 13.0 12.5 87.7Contractor WorkYears 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 3.0

TCSP Funding 1,060 1,071 2,131Civil Service 2.2 2.2 4.4Contractor WorkYears 0.0

Applied Sci Program Spt Funding 584 603 1,187Civil Service 2.4 2.4 4.8Contractor WorkYears 0.0

GPM Funding 500 500 500 500 500 2,500Civil Service 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.5Contractor WorkYears 0.0

NRAs & ROSES Funding 500 500 500 500 500 500 3,000Civil Service 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0Contractor WorkYears 0.0

TAPeS Funding 116 116 116 116 116 580Civil Service 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.5Contractor WorkYears 0.0

GOES-R, GOES-R3, ESSP Funding 550 5,400 5,400 3,300 1,650 1,650 17,950Civil Service 4.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 54.0Contractor WorkYears 0.0

LIS MO&DA & TRMM End of Mission Funding 1,500 1,500 1,500 4,500Civil Service 2.5 2.5 2.5 7.5Contractor WorkYears 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.0

29


Business Initiative: Tropical Cloud Systems and Processes Project



Budget – (In Full Cost)Budget – (In Full Cost)Winning proposals announced March 24, Earth Science won 3 for a total MSFC budget of $3.238M and 2.2 FTEs for 3 year duration (FY05-FY07). HQ intends to negotiate final budget.

Earth Science New Work Tropical Cloud Systems and Processes Project (TCSP)

Classification: Directed __ or Competitive _X__Capture Manager: Robbie HoodBus. Dev. Point of Contact: Tim MillerCustomer Point of Contact: Rahmesh Kakar /NASA HQPartnerships: NSSTC, ARC, DRC, GSFC, and Universities Probability of Occurrence: Known __ Probable (>90%)

100%_(3/14/05) Probable (80<90%) __ Possible % __ (10,25,50 or 75%)


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11Possible FundingProbable Funding 1,060 1,071Known In-guide FundingTotal Funding 1,060 1,071 0 0 0Known Civil ServiceProbable Civil Service 2.2 2.2Possible CSTotal Civil Service 2.2 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0Contractor WorkYears

Existing systems:

Enable any future system:GEOSS, ESSP, HYDROS, GPM, NPOESS/NPP, GOES-R

Customers:NASA HQS, NOAA, Various International

Assumptions:Foundation of Projection: Source of Funding: NASA HQ

NASA National Objective #5-study the Earth from spaceNASA Strategic Objectives #6-RTF, #12-Advanced Aeronautical Technologies, #13-E&PO, #14-Earth Sys Science, #16-International Partners, #18-Commercial Partners

30


Equipment

Etc.



Other RequirementsOther Requirements



Response Status:Inwork: _X____ Submitted: ______ Other: ______

Other Key Drivers As ApplicableOther Key Drivers As Applicable

Environmental: Environmental: Role of Scientists at NASA, Full Cost, Vision for Role of Scientists at NASA, Full Cost, Vision for Space ExplorationSpace Exploration

Political: Political: Congress interest in retaining Earth Science, EarmarksCongress interest in retaining Earth Science, Earmarks

Competition: Competition: Other NASA, University ResearchersOther NASA, University Researchers

Past Capture Rate: Past Capture Rate: 50%

Link to Agency Strategic Plan:Link to Agency Strategic Plan:NASA Strategic Objectives #6, #12-14, #16, #18



(CS/Cont.)



31


Business Initiative: Applied Sciences Program Support



Budget – (In Full Cost)Budget – (In Full Cost)

Earth Science New Work Applied Sciences Program Support

Classification: Directed __ or Competitive _X__Capture Manager: Steve GoodmanBus. Dev. Point of Contact: Tim MillerCustomer Point of Contact: NASA HQ/Ron BirkPartnerships: HQS, NSSTC, SSC, GSFC, LaRC, ARC, JPL Probability of Occurrence: Known __ Probable (>90%) _X_ Probable (80<90%) __ Possible % __ (10,25,50 or 75%)


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11Possible FundingProbable Funding 584 603Known In-guide FundingTotal Funding 584 603 0 0 0Known Civil ServiceProbable Civil Service 2.4 2.4Possible FundingTotal Civil Service 2.4 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0Contractor WorkYears

Existing systems:


Customers:NASA HQS, OSTP and Other Federal Agencies, Group on Earth Observations (GEO)

Provides program management support to the NASA Applied Science Program which already exists in known work at the level of 1 FTE and $221k in FY05.



32


Equipment

Etc.







Environmental:Environmental:

Political: Political: OSTP and Environmental Ministers WorldwideOSTP and Environmental Ministers Worldwide

Competition:Competition:


Link to Agency Strategic Plan:Link to Agency Strategic Plan:NASA Strategic Objectives #6, #13-16, #18



(CS/Cont.)

Tech Work & Team Mgt FY06-11 CS NoEarth Atmosphere FY06-11 CS & Cont. NoEarth Sci Appl Research FY06-11 CS & Cont. NoSpace Physics FY06-11 CS No


Response Status:Inwork: _X____ Submitted: ______ Other: ______

33


Business Initiative: Global Precipitation Mission



Budget – (In Full Cost)Budget – (In Full Cost)GPM will replace Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM). Total proposal is $1M and 2FTEs per year with $500k and .5 FTE per year to MSFC for a 5 year duration. Possible instrument development, validation, and research.

Earth Science New Work Global Precipitation Mission (GPM)

(Earth Science Roadmap follow-on to TRMM)

Classification: Directed __ or Competitive _X_Capture Manager: Pete RobertsonBus. Dev. Point of Contact: Steve GoodmanCustomer Point of Contact: Rahmesh Kakar /NASA HQPartnerships: GSFC, NSSTC, UniversitiesProbability of Occurrence: Known __ Probable (>90%) __Probable (80<90%) __ Possible % 75%_ (10,25,50 or 75%)

Existing systems:

Enable any future system:Sensor Web architecture for Earth (GEOSS) and spiral for

Planetary Missions

Customers: NASA HQS, NOAA, Various International


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11Possible Funding 500 500 500 500 500Probable FundingKnown In-guide FundingTotal Funding 0 500 500 500 500 500Known Civil ServiceProbable Civil ServicePossible CS 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5Total Civil Service 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5Contractor WorkYears


NASA National Objective #5-study the Earth from spaceNASA Strategic Objectives #6-RTF, #13-E&PO, #14-Earth Sys Science, #16-International Partners, #18-Commercial Partners

34






(CS/Cont.)

Tech Work & Team Mgt FY06-11 CS NoEarth Atmosphere FY06-11 CS No




Response Status:In-work: _X___ Submitted: _____ Other: _____




Competition: Competition: Other NASA, University ResearchersOther NASA, University Researchers, , Other Industry partner


Link to Agency Strategic Plan:Link to Agency Strategic Plan:NASA Strategic Objectives #6, #13-14, #16, #18


Equipment

Etc.

35


Business Initiative: Applied Sciences NRAs



Budget – (In Full Cost)Budget – (In Full Cost)3 NRAs pending with 70% probability: NEWS; MAP; and DSTESR with MSFC budget of $250k and .5 FTE per year for 3 year duration.

5 ROSES proposals submitted with 50% probability. Budget will be $250k per year each proposal with 1.5 FTE total all proposals for 3 year duration.

Earth Science New WorkScience Mission Directorate Applied Sciences NRAs- NASA Energy & Water-Cycle Sponsored research (NEWS)- Modeling, Analysis & Prediction (MAP) NRA- Decision Support through Earth Science Results (DSTESR)Research Opportunities in Earth & Space Science (ROSES)Classification: Directed __ or Competitive _X__Capture Manager: VariousBus. Dev. Point of Contact: Steve GoodmanPartnerships: GSFC, Universities Probability of Occurrence: Known __ Probable (>90%) __ Probable (80<90%) __ Possible % 50-75% (10,25,50 or 75%)


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11Possible Funding 500 500 500 500 500 500Probable FundingKnown In-guide FundingTotal Funding 500 500 500 500 500 500Known Civil ServiceProbable Civil ServicePossible CS 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Total Civil Service 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0Contractor WorkYears

Existing systems:

Enable any future system:ESSP, HYDROS, GPM, NPOESS/NPP, GOES-R

Customers:NASA HQS, NOAA, Other Federal and International

Foundation of Projection: Source of Funding: NASA HQ

Assumptions:


36


Equipment

Etc.






Response Status:Inwork: _____ Submitted: _X___ Other: _____


(CS/Cont.)






Competition: Competition: Other NASA, University researchers, Other NASA, University researchers, Other Industry partner




37


Business Initiative: Terrestrial and Planetary Environments




Earth Science New WorkTerrestrial and Planetary Environments (TAPeS) Launch Commit Criteria (LCC) and Launch Operations &

Recovery

Classification: Directed _X_ or Competitive __Capture Manager: Steve GoodmanBus. Dev. Point of Contact: Barry RobertsCustomer Point of Contact: Glenn Overbey/MP71Partnerships: Shuttle, KSC, JSC Probability of Occurrence: Known __ Probable (>90%)

__ Probable (80<90%) __ Possible % _50%_(10,25,50 or 75%)


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11Possible FundingProbable FundingKnown In-guide Funding 116 116 116 116 116Total Funding 116 116 116 116 116Known Civil ServiceProbable Civil ServicePossible Civil Service 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5Total Civil Service 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5Contractor Work Years

Existing systems:


Customers:NASA HQS/MSFC/KSC/JSC

Waiting Change Board approval.Assumptions:Foundation of Projection: Source of Funding: Shuttle Project Office

NASA National Objective #5-study the Earth from spaceNASA Strategic Objectives #6-RTF, #13-E&PO, #14-Earth Sys Science, #15-Sun’s Earth Sys, #16-International Partners, #17-Space Transportation, #18-Commercial Partners

38


Equipment

Etc.







Environmental: Environmental: Full Cost, Vision for Space ExplorationFull Cost, Vision for Space Exploration

Political:Political:

Competition: Competition: UniversitiesUniversities

Past Capture Rate: Past Capture Rate: New ProgramNew Program

Link to Agency Strategic Plan:Link to Agency Strategic Plan:NASA Strategic Objectives #6, #13-18



(CS/Cont.)

Tech Work & Team Mgt FY06-10 CS NoEarth Atmosphere FY06-10 CS No


Response Status:Inwork: ______ Submitted: _X_____ Other: ______

39


Business Initiative: Geostationary Lightning Mapper

Description of Initiative (All current and evolvingDescription of Initiative (All current and evolvingPrograms/projects/activities) (Direct & Corp. Programs/projects/activities) (Direct & Corp. G&A)G&A)


Budget – (In Full Cost)Budget – (In Full Cost)GOES-R GLM instrument is a $60M total contract with possible $6M total and 2 FTEs per year to MSFC for 5 years. Launch 2012.

GOES Lightning Mapper Risk Reduction is a 6 year effort with $300k total and 2 FTEs per year to MSFC.

LMS is a Earth System Science Pathfinder (ESSP) AO for a $125M total contract with possible $10M total and 6 FTEs per year to MSFC for 3 years. Launch FY10.

Earth Science New Work- Geostationary Lightning Mapper instrument (GOES-R)- GOES Lightning Mapper Risk Reduction (GOES-R3) sci/algorithms- ESSP new lightning instrument as part of a suite of sensors

Classification: Directed ___ or Competitive _X__Capture Manager: Hugh ChristianBus. Dev. Point of Contact: Mike VanhooserCustomer Point of Contact: GOES-R GLM: NOAA/S.Kirkner; GLM

Risk Reduction: Paul Menzel/NOAA; ESSP: Chuck Gay/NASA HQ Partnerships: GSFC, NOAA, NSSTCProbability of Occurrence: Known ___ Probable (>90%) __ Probable (80<90%) __ Possible % 25% (10,25, 50 or 75%)

Existing systems:


Customers:NASA HQS/MSFC/KSC/JSCNOAA, DOD, FAA, DOI, DOE, Commercial and International


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11Possible Funding 550 5,400 5,400 3,300 1,650 1,650Probable FundingKnown In-guide FundingTotal Funding 550 5,400 5,400 3,300 1,650 1,650Known Civil ServiceProbable Civil ServicePossible CS 4.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0Total Civil Service 4.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0Contractor Work Years



40


Equipment Test and Calibration

Etc.



Other RequirementsOther Requirements Other Key Drivers As ApplicableOther Key Drivers As Applicable



Competition: Competition: Other NASA, University Researchers, Other NASA, University Researchers, Other Industry partner





(CS/Cont.)

Tech Work & Team Mgt FY05-11 CS NoEarth Atmosphere FY05-11 CS NoEarth Sci Appl Research FY05-11 CS NoRemote Sensing Technology FY05-11 CS No



No changes


Response Status:Inwork: Lightning Mapper & ESSP Submitted: GOES-R3 Other: _____

41


Business Initiative: Lightning Imaging Sensor




LIS MO&DA is follow-on to LIS which is in Congressional Budget thru FY06. Total MSFC budget $1.5M and 2.5 FTEs per year for FY07-FY09 depends on outcome of Senior Review in April 2005.

Earth Science New Work Lightning Imaging Sensor (LIS) MO&DA

Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) End of Mission

Classification: Directed __ or Competitive _X_Capture Manager: Hugh ChristianBus. Dev. Point of Contact: Steve GoodmanCustomer Point of Contact: Jack Kaye/NASA HQPartnerships: GSFC, NOAA, NSSTCProbability of Occurrence: Known __ Probable __ (>90%)Probable (80<90%) __ Possible % 25% (10,25,50 or 75%)

Existing systems:

Enable any future system:ESSP, GOES-R

Customers:NASA HQS, NOAA


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11Possible Funding 1,500 1,500 1,500Probable FundingKnown In-guide FundingTotal Funding 0 1,500 1,500 1,500 0Known Civil ServiceProbable Civil ServicePossible CS 2.5 2.5 2.5Total Civil Service 0 2.5 2.5 2.5 0Contractor WorkYears 1.0 1.0 1.0



42






(CS/Cont.)

Tech Work & Team Mgt FY07-09 CS & Cont NoEarth Sci Appl Research FY07-09 CS & Cont No




Response Status:Inwork: ____ Submitted: _X___ Other: _____




Competition: Competition: Other NASA, University researchers,Other NASA, University researchers, Other Industry partner




Equipment

Etc.

43



Space Science Branch – XD12

Organization: XD12Author: Linda SmarttProgram Manager: Dr. John M. DavisDate: March 25, 2005

44


Assumptions: All work is competitive and projections assume historical win rates.

Business Initiative: Cassini

Description of InitiativeDescription of Initiative Benefits to Doing the WorkBenefits to Doing the Work


Brief DescriptionSolar System Exploration Cassini – Existing program; GSFC SubAllot; No full cost $ to date.Physical Properties of Cosmic/Lunar Dust Particles (Proposals pending)Classification: Competitive X. Capture Manager: Frank SixBus. Dev. Point of Contact: Mike VanhooserCustomer Point of Contact: Andy DantzlerPartnerships: GSFC, JPL, Univ. of Colorado Probability of Occurrence:

Cassini 75%, Cosmic/Lunar Dust 25%

Existing systems: Cassini is an ongoing mission with the potential for scientific breakthroughs.

Enable any future system:The dust data will support future ESMD activities.

Customers:Science Mission Directorate; Solar System Exploration or Sun-Solar System

Exploration Systems Mission Directorate (Potential)

Include Direct Civil Service only. CFO will load inidrect Civil ServiceEstimate for this 1st submit should be +/- 10%

$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 337 347 362 381 381 381Probable FundingKnown In-guide Funding 308 307 328 341 341 341Total Funding 645 654 690 722 722 722Known Civil Service 1 1 1 1 1 1Probable Civil ServicePossible CSTotal Civil Service 1 1 1 1 1 1Contractor WorkYears 0 0 0 0 0


Cassini: No less than 1 scientific paper per year.

Lunar and Martian Dust Studies: Equipment Modification: 2/06Photoelectric yields and equilibrium potentials 12/06Charging and equilibrium potentials for ion collisions 9/08Complex refractive indices 12/08

45


Equipment

Etc.







Past Capture Rate:Past Capture Rate:

Link to Agency Strategic Plan:Link to Agency Strategic Plan:

Link to Center Core Capability/Mission:Link to Center Core Capability/Mission:


(CS/Cont.)

___________ __________ _________ __________

___________ __________ _________ __________



__________ __________ ________ _________

__________ __________ ________ _________


__________ __________ _________ __________

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


46



Business Initiative: Universe Theme Research



Brief DescriptionResearch supporting the Universe ThemeIncludes suborbital programs (HERO and ATIC), high energydetector development programs and data analysis supporting theESA Integral mission.Classification: Competitive X. Capture Manager: Present and future PIs (John Davis)Bus. Dev. Point of Contact: Mike VanhooserCustomer Point of Contact: Ann KinneyPartnerships: Washington Univ., GSFC, Harvard Probability of Occurrence: Integral, HERO are funded programsthrough FY07, other projects will be recompeted (50%).

Existing systems: Projects combine technology development with scientific observations and analysis

Enable any future system:Constellation-X, JIMO Science Instrumentation, Follow-on Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiters, Black Hole Finder Probe.

Customers:Science Mission Directorate, Universe and Solar System Exploration DivisionsAlso NIH and UCB collaborations pending.


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 2,395 2,716 3,676 3,750 2,995Probable FundingKnown In-guide Funding 1,340 1,108 219 0 0 0Total Funding 3,735 3,824 3,895 3,750 2,995 0Known Civil Service 4.3 3.6 1Probable Civil ServicePossible CSTotal Civil Service 4.3 3.6 1 0 0 0Contractor WorkYears 1.8 1.8 0 0 0 0


HERO launches are planned for 04/05, 04/06 and 04/07, backup launch dates occur each year in SeptemberATIC launch is scheduled for 01/06, backup launch dates occur at yearly intervals.Detector development is a continuous process with no fixed milestones.

47


Equipment

Etc.











(CS/Cont.)

___________ __________ _________ __________

___________ __________ _________ __________



__________ __________ ________ _________

__________ __________ ________ _________


__________ __________ _________ __________

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


48



Business Initiative: Sun Earth Research



Brief DescriptionSun Earth Research is a broad effort that includes support

for flight programs (), a suborbital program (SUMI), and several instrument development, data analysis and Guest Investigators programs.

Classification: Competitive X.Capture Manager: Present and future PIs (John Davis)Bus. Dev. Point of Contact: Mike VanhooserCustomer Point of Contact: Richard Fisher (Bill Wagner)Partnerships: GSFC, NRL, NSO, Rice Univ. LMSAL, UCB Probability of Occurrence: Future mission funding uncertain

except for IMAGE, SUMI has been reproposed.

Existing systems: Ulysses, Polar, Image are existing missions for which we provide scientific and programmatic support.

Enable any future system:SUMI is a precursor for MTRAP. The instrument development programs will support proposals for opportunities in the Geospace program.Our theoretical studies will support SDO

Customers: Science Mission Directorate: Sun-Solar System Connection theme.


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 3,837 3,848 4,106 4,180 4,180 0Probable FundingKnown In-guide Funding 1,331 967 910 944 944 0Total Funding 5,168 4,815 5,016 5,124 5,124 0Known Civil Service 4.5 3.25 3 3 3 0Probable Civil ServicePossible CSTotal Civil Service 4.5 3.25 3 3 3 0Contractor WorkYears 2.5 2.5 1 1 1 0


SUMI is scheduled for launch in the fall of 2006 with a proposed reflight in the fall of 2008.Preparation of Senior Review proposals for IMAGE and Ulysses in April 2006. Convert IMAGE software to a Windows platform.Provide real time IMAGE support for HAARP campaign during January February 2006.

49


Equipment

Etc.











(CS/Cont.)

___________ __________ _________ __________

___________ __________ _________ __________



__________ __________ ________ _________

__________ __________ ________ _________


__________ __________ _________ __________

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


50


MSFC Business Base ForecastScience and Technology DirectoratePropulsion Research Center - XD20

Organization: XD20Author: Alex SmithProgram Manager Dr. George R. Schmidt Date: March 25, 2005

51


Assumptions: Currently Dr. Gregory Drake on critical hire job code until August 2006 for charge codeDirect Labor charges waived for this effort

Business Initiative: Ionic Liquids for Melt Castable Munitions




Brief DescriptionIonic Liquids for munitions focuses upon the synthesis and

characterization of new materials for insensitive munitions applications joining active USAF/ONR sponsored effort.

Classification: Directed____ or Competitive_X__. Capture Manager: Dr. Gregory DrakeBus. Dev. Point of Contact: Dr. Gregory DrakeCustomer Point of Contact: Dr. Tommy Hawkins AFRLPartnerships: Department of Defense (USAF and USN)Probability of Occurrence:

Known _X__ Probable(>90%)____


Existing systems: Space Shuttle- Improving range and lifetimes of flight vehicles-Reducing size of flight vehicles -Human friendly propellants-Safer propellants from hostile activities

Enable any future system: - Will enable dramatic payload increases per flight- Energy dense solid propellant ingredients will increase lift capabilities-Environmentally friendly materials will reduce costs-Customers: NASA, Department of Defense (USAF, USN, Army) as well as industrial partners such as Aerojet, Boeing, ATKThiokol.


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible FundingProbable Funding 50Known In-guide Funding 50Total Funding 50 50Known Civil Service 0.2Probable Civil Service 0.2Possible CSTotal Civil Service 0.2 0.2Contractor WorkYears

Foundation of Projection:Source of Funding: NASA Headquarters

- Directed chemical synthesis researchin finding and developing new chemical propellants is critical for the next shuttlereplacement vehicle

-Supply 2 ingredients to USAF by Oct 05

52


Equipment Several instruments for characterizationIncluding pycnonmeter, dropweight tester, frictionTester, raman spectrometer, viscometer50K for instrumentation/materials

Etc.




Environmental:Green Propellants very desirableEnvironmental:Green Propellants very desirable

Political: DoD/Propulsion industries very Political: DoD/Propulsion industries very supportivesupportive

Competition: Other DoD/ DoE laboratoriesCompetition: Other DoD/ DoE laboratoriesPast Capture Rate: Past Capture Rate:




(CS/Cont.)

Chemist(BS)__ __Aug 05__ None __yes____

Chemist (PhD) __Jan 06__ _None_ ___yes_____

Workforce Development/Training Requirements: Organic Chemist skilled in classical organic and/or inorganic synthesis techniques willing to work energetic materials


4205/104__ 03/05 – 12/07_ Yes___ _________

__________ __________ ________ _________


__4205/104_ _03/05-12/07_ _yes____ ______

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


53



Business Initiative: Ionic Liquids for New Lubricants




Brief DescriptionIonic Liquids for lubricants focuses upon the synthesis and

characterization of new materials for new thermally robust lubricants with USAF sponsored effort.

Classification: Directed____ or Competitive_X__. Capture Manager: Dr. Gregory DrakeBus. Dev. Point of Contact: Dr. Gregory DrakeCustomer Point of Contact: Dr. Steven Svejda AFRLPartnerships: Department of Defense (USAF)Probability of Occurrence:



Existing systems: Space Shuttle- Improving range and lifetimes of flight vehicles-Reducing O&M budgets of flight vehicles -Low toxicity materialsEnable any future system: - Will enable higher operating temperatures- Better physical properties will reduce thermal management issues-Environmentally friendly materials will reduce costs-Customers: NASA, Department of Defense (USAF, USN, Army) as well as industrial partners such as Aerojet, Boeing, ATKThiokol.


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible FundingProbable Funding 25 25Known In-guide Funding 12Total Funding 12 25 25Known Civil Service 0.5Probable Civil Service 0.1 0.1Possible CSTotal Civil Service 0.5 0.1 0.1Contractor WorkYears


-

Directed chemical synthesis researchin finding and developing new useful materialsis critical for harsh space environments that NASA will be exploring

54


Equipment Several instruments for characterizationIncluding pycnonmeter, dropweight tester, frictionTester, raman spectrometer, viscometer25K of equipment

Etc.




Environmental: None at this timeEnvironmental: None at this time

Political: DoD/Propulsion industries very Political: DoD/Propulsion industries very supportive supportive

Competition: Other DoD/ DoE laboratoriesCompetition: Other DoD/ DoE laboratoriesPast Capture Rate: Past Capture Rate:




(CS/Cont.)

Chemist(BS)__ __Aug 05__ None _Yes___

Chemist (PhD) __Jan 06__ _None_ __Yes____



4205/104__ 03/05 – 12/07_ Yes___ _________

__________ __________ ________ _________


___None__ __________ _________ __________

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


55



Business Initiative: New Energetic Ionic Liquids




Brief DescriptionNew Energetic Ionic Liquids focuses upon the synthesis and

characterization of new chemical materials for liquids propellant applications joining active AFOSR sponsored effort.

Classification: Directed____ or Competitive_X__. Capture Manager: Dr. Gregory DrakeBus. Dev. Point of Contact: Dr. Gregory DrakeCustomer Point of Contact: Dr. Michael Berman (AFOSR)Partnerships: Department of Defense (USAF)Probability of Occurrence:



Existing systems: Space Shuttle, Delta-Improving range and lifetimes of flight vehicles-Reducing size of flight vehicles -Human friendly propellants

Enable any future system: - Will enable dramatic payload increases per flight- Energy dense liquid propellant fuels will increase lift capabilities-Environmentally friendly materials will reduce costs

Customers: NASA, Department of Defense (USAF, USN, Army) as well as industrial partners such as Aerojet, Boeing, ATKThiokol.


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible FundingProbable Funding 50Known In-guide Funding 50Total Funding 50 50Known Civil Service 0.2Probable Civil Service 0.2Possible CSTotal Civil Service 0.2 0.2Contractor WorkYears


-

Directed chemical synthesis researchin finding and developing new chemical propellants is critical for the next shuttlereplacement vehicle

56


Equipment Several instruments for characterizationIncluding pycnonmeter, dropweight tester, frictionTester, raman spectrometer, viscometer100K for equipment requirements

Etc.




Environmental: None at this timeEnvironmental: None at this time

Political: DoD/Propulsion industries very Political: DoD/Propulsion industries very supportivesupportive

Competition: Other NASA/ DoD/ DoE Competition: Other NASA/ DoD/ DoE laboratorieslaboratoriesPast Capture Rate: Past Capture Rate:




(CS/Cont.)

Chemist(BS)__ __Aug 05__ None _________

Chemist (PhD) __Jan 06__ _None_ __________



4205/104__ 03/05 – 12/07_ Yes___ _____no____

__________ __________ ________ _________


__4205.104__ 03/05-12/07_ __yes__ ___NO_

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


57


Assumptions:

Business Initiative: Magnetic Nozzle Detachment




• Build ExperimentBuild Experiment

• High Energy Plasma SourceHigh Energy Plasma Source

• Demonstrate Plasma DetachmentDemonstrate Plasma Detachment

Brief DescriptionMagnetic Nozzle and Detachment Efficiency of the Plasma Plume

Classification: Directed____ or Competitive___X__. Capture Manager:Bus. Dev. Point of Contact:Customer Point of Contact:Partnerships: University of Texas, JSC & UAHProbability of Occurrence:

Known __X__ Probable(>90%)____


Existing systems:


• High Power Plasma Propulsion

Customers:

• High Power Plasma Thrusters that use magnetized plasmas


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible FundingProbable FundingKnown In-guide Funding 679Total Funding 679Known Civil Service 2Probable Civil ServicePossible CSTotal Civil Service 2Contractor WorkYears 1.5


58


Equipment

• $125K for power supply need

Etc.











(CS/Cont.)Electrical Eng 04/01/05 - yes

03/31/07

Mechanical Eng 04/01/05 - yes 03/31/07


• Earned Value Management (EVM) Training


4205 04/01/05 – 03/31/07


4205/101 04/01/05 – 03/31/07

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


59


Assumptions:

Business Initiative: Test Platform Analysis




• Support of overall designSupport of overall design

• Design of diagnostics suite to use on ISS for Design of diagnostics suite to use on ISS for EP testingEP testing

Brief Description System Design of High Power Electric Propulsion Test Platform on ISS

Classification: Directed____ or Competitive__X___Capture Manager:Bus. Dev. Point of Contact:Customer Point of Contact:Partnerships: JSC, MSFC & GRCProbability of Occurrence:



Existing systems:

• Electric Propulsion (EP) testing in space environment


• EP Testing

Customers:

• EP community at large


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible FundingProbable FundingKnown In-guide Funding 207Total Funding 207Known Civil Service 0.9Probable Civil ServicePossible CSTotal Civil Service 0.9Contractor WorkYears


60


Equipment

Etc.

• MS Project Software











(CS/Cont.)

Senior Physicist 04/01/05 - YesFrom UAH 2006


• Earned Value Management (EVM) Training


__________ __________ ________ _________

__________ __________ ________ _________


__________ __________ _________ __________

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


61


Assumptions:

Business Initiative: High Energy Monpropellants



Budget – (In Full Cost)Budget – (In Full Cost)Key Milestones we commit to with the Key Milestones we commit to with the BudgetBudget

• Data for Monopropellant Systems StudyData for Monopropellant Systems Study

Brief DescriptionThe effort is focused on evaluating combustion properties and ignition characteristics of high energy monopropellants

Classification: Directed__X__ or Competitive_____. Capture Manager: Les AlexanderBus. Dev. Point of Contact: In-Space PropulsionCustomer Point of Contact: In-Space PropulsionPartnerships: Department of Defense, AFRLProbability of Occurrence:

Known ____ Probable(>90%)__X__


Existing systems:

• Hydrazine replacement


• Primary propulsion for deep space

Customers:

• ISP


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible FundingProbable Funding 8Known In-guide FundingTotal Funding 8Known Civil Service Probable Civil Service ,05Possible CSTotal Civil Service 0.05Contractor WorkYears


62


Equipment

Etc.











(CS/Cont.)__N/A_____ __________ _________ __________

___________ __________ _________ __________



4205/104 10/01/05 05/01/06 ________ _________

__________ __________ ________ _________


__________ __________ _________ __________

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


63


Assumptions:

Business Initiative: Advanced Lithiumn Lorentz Force Accelerator




FY06: Develop Lithium Feed SystemFY06: Develop Lithium Feed System FY07: Develop 2FY07: Develop 2ndnd Generation Lithium Feed Generation Lithium Feed SystemSystem

Brief Description -Advanced Lithiumn Lorentz Force Accelerator – Prometheus funded project to demonstrate new thruster technologies.

Classification: Directed____ or Competitive___X__. Capture Manager: Randy BaggettBus. Dev. Point of Contact:Customer Point of Contact:Partnerships: University & IndustryProbability of Occurrence:

Known __X__ Probable(>90%)__X_


Existing systems:

• Prove performance of Lithium MPD thruster


• Manned Mars & cargo missions

Customers:

• Prometheus Office


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible FundingProbable Funding 100Known In-guide Funding 100Total Funding 100 100Known Civil Service 0.1Probable Civil Service 0.1Possible CSTotal Civil Service 0.1 0.1Contractor WorkYears 0.1 0.1


64


Equipment:

Glove Box, Bldg. 4705

Etc.











(CS/Cont.)

Aero Engineer (Present) – 10/01/07


None


4205/101E (Present) – 10/01/07


__________ __________ _________ __________

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


65


Assumptions:

Business Initiative: Gallium Electromagnetic Thruster



Budget – (In Full Budget – (In Full Cost)Cost) Key Milestones we commit to with the BudgetKey Milestones we commit to with the Budget

FY06: FY06: - Complete Cycle 1 Design- Complete Cycle 1 Design - Complete Detailed Test Plan- Complete Detailed Test Plan

FY07: FY07: - Complete Fabrication- Complete Fabrication - Validate Design Approach- Validate Design Approach

FY08: FY08: - Demonstrate Intrinsic Merit- Demonstrate Intrinsic Merit - Measure Plume Characteristics- Measure Plume Characteristics - Assess Wear Mechnanisms- Assess Wear Mechnanisms

Brief Description Gallium Electromagnetic Thruster for In-Space Propulsion - Prometheus funded project will demonstrate new thruster technology Classification: Directed____ or Competitive__X___

Capture Manager: Mike LapointeBus. Dev. Point of Contact: Customer Point of Contact:Partnerships: University & IndustryProbability of Occurrence:

Known __X__ Probable(>90%)__X__


Existing systems:

• Major increase in reliability over current SOA


• Enabling technology for robotic exploration of outer planets

Customers:



$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible FundingProbable Funding 878 965Known In-guide Funding 413Total Funding 413 878 965Known Civil Service 0.5Probable Civil Service 1 1Possible CSTotal Civil Service 0.5 1 1Contractor WorkYears 0.5 1 1


66


Equipment None

Etc.











(CS/Cont.)

Aero Engineer 10/01/06 – 10/01/08


None


4205/101E 10/01/06 – 10/01/08

4205/109 10/01/07 – 10/01/08


None

Response Status:


67


Assumptions:

Business Initiative: Busek Bismuth Hall Thruster




NoneNone

Brief Description – Busek Bismuth Hall Thruster Technical support for thruster development project

Classification: Directed__X__ or Competitive_____. Capture Manager:Bus. Dev. Point of Contact: Randy BaggettCustomer Point of Contact:Partnerships: Department of DefenseProbability of Occurrence:



Existing systems:

• Prove performance of Bismuth Hall Thruster


Customers:



$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible FundingProbable FundingKnown In-guide FundingTotal Funding 0 Known Civil Service 0.2Probable Civil ServicePossible CSTotal Civil ServiceContractor WorkYears


68


Equipment

Etc.




Environmental: N/AEnvironmental: N/A







(CS/Cont.)

__N/A______ __________ _________ __________

___________ __________ _________ __________



____N/A___ __________ ________ _________

__________ __________ ________ _________


__________ __________ _________ __________

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


69


Assumptions:

Business Initiative: New Propulsion Research & Technology




Brief DescriptionClassification: Directed____ or Competitive_X__. Capture Manager:Bus. Dev. Point of Contact: Customer Point of Contact: Partnerships: Probability of Occurrence:

Known ___ Probable(>90%)____


Existing systems: yes Enable any future system: yes

Customers: potential customers include the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate, Space Science Directorate, and DOD. This will be work proposed under competitions for work related to expected Prometheus EP, Nuclear Thermal Propulsion, ESRT, In-Space propulsion, and DoD initiatives


$M FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 2.5 7.7 10.5 10.5 11.5 12.0Probable FundingKnown In-guide FundingTotal FundingKnown Civil Service Probable Civil ServicePossible CS 6.25 19.25 25 26.25 28.75 30Total Civil ServiceContractor WorkYears


-

70


Etc.




Environmental:Environmental:Political:Political:Competition: Other NASA/ DoD/ DoE Competition: Other NASA/ DoD/ DoE laboratorieslaboratoriesPast Capture Rate: Past Capture Rate:




(CS/Cont.)Primarily available Civil Service workforce

_________

__________


Building Need Dates Available New Rqmt. Space Type:4205 labs__________ __________ ________ _________


____________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


71



$M FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11

NTP 2.5 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

Prometheus EP 1.5 2 2 2 2

ESRT 3.5 4 4 4 4

In-Space 1 2 1.5 1.5 1.5

DOD 0.2 0.5 0.5 1 1

Power Conversion 0.5 1 2.5 3 3

Total ($M) 2.5 7.7 10.5 10.5 11.5 12

FTE 6.25 19.25 25 26.25 28.75 30

Propulsion Research Center - Possible Work3/30/2005

72



Space Optics Manufacturing and Technology Center – XD30

Organization: XD30Author: Mark BoudreauxProgram Manager: Dr. Scott SmithDate: March 25, 2005

73


Assumptions:




Existing systems:

Enable any future system:•Technology development for NASA.•NASA Optical SubstratesCustomers:• NASA/Industry


$K FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 200 220 240 300 300 300Probable Funding 30 33 37 40 40 40Known In-guide FundingTotal Funding 0 230 253 277 340 340 340Known Civil Service 0Probable Civil Service 0.075 0.080 0.085 0.090 0.090 0.090Possible CS 0.750 0.800 0.850 0.900 0.900 0.900Total Civil Service 0.825 0.880 0.935 0.990 0.990 0.990Contractor WorkYears 0

Foundation of Projection: Project manager forecastSource of Funding: NASA/IndustryFund Center - WBS: Various

Brief DescriptionUtilize “Small” Cryogenic Test Chamber for testing of Agency/Industrial CustomersClassification: Directed X or Competitive _X_. Capture Manager: Cary ReilyBus. Dev. Point of Contact: NACustomer Point of Contact: NASA/IndustryPartnerships: NASA/IndustryProbability of Occurrence:

Known Probable(>90%) ____Probable (80<90%) _X_ Possible % (10,25,50 or 75%)

02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Key Milestones

SOMTC (XD30): Small Chamber

Various

74


Equipment No Additional Equipment

Etc.





Political: N/APolitical: N/A

Competition: NoneCompetition: None

Past Capture Rate: N/APast Capture Rate: N/A

Link to Agency Strategic Plan: YesLink to Agency Strategic Plan: Yes

Link to Center Core Capability/Mission: OpticsLink to Center Core Capability/Mission: Optics


(CS/Cont.)

___Test Eng __FY06-FY11 _CS____ _Yes_____

___________ __________ _________ __________

Workforce Development/Training Requirements: N/A


_4718_ __FY06-FY11____ __Yes__ __No___

__________ __________ ________ _________


___N/A_____ _________ ____ _____

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


75


Assumptions:




Existing systems:

Enable any future system:•Technology development for NASA.•NASA Optical SubstratesCustomers:• DARPA


$K FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 228 228 228 228 228Probable Funding 114Known In-guide FundingTotal Funding 0 114 228 228 228 228 228Known Civil Service 0Probable Civil Service 1 0 0 0 0 0Possible CS 2 2 2 2 2Total Civil Service 1 2 2 2 2 2Contractor WorkYears 0

Foundation of Projection: Project manager forecastSource of Funding: NASA/IndustryFund Center - WBS: Various

Brief DescriptionLarge Aperture Space Surveillance (Optical)LASSO DARPA Program for in-space manufacture of a large optical surface. Classification: Directed or Competitive _X_. Capture Manager: Whitt BrantleyBus. Dev. Point of Contact: N/ACustomer Point of Contact: Karen Woods/DARPAPartnerships: NASA/IndustryProbability of Occurrence:

Known X Probable(>90%) ____Probable (80<90%) __ Possible % 25 (10,25,50 or 75%)

02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Key Milestones

SOMTC (XD30): LASSO

Phase 1

Phase 2

Phase 3

Phase 4

76


Equipment TBD

Etc.






Competition: YesCompetition: Yes

Past Capture Rate: 30%Past Capture Rate: 30%

Link to Agency Strategic Plan: In-space Link to Agency Strategic Plan: In-space ManufacturingManufacturingLink to Center Core Capability/Mission: OpticsLink to Center Core Capability/Mission: Optics


(CS/Cont.)

GNC FY06-FY11 CS NoFUNPHY FY06-FY11 CS No



_NSSTC_ __FY06-FY11__ __Yes__ __No___

__________ __________ ________ _________


___TBD_____ _________ ____ _____

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


77


Assumptions:• Budget is a preliminary estimate of available funding • Center capital investment supplement may be required

SOMTC (XD30): 30 Meter Telescope Mirror Coatings




Brief Description• Optical coating of approximately 860 1.2-meter hexagonal

segments for the Thirty Meter Telescope ProgramClassification: Directed____ or Competitive__X___. Capture Manager: XD32/ Dr. Alan P. ShapiroBus. Dev. Point of Contact: DA01/Sonny MitchellCustomer Point of Contact: ITT/Joseph PantanoPartnerships: ITT, Caltech, University of CaliforniaProbability of Occurrence:

Known ____ Probable(>90%)____

Probable (80<90%) ____ Possible % __25_(10,25,50 or 75%)

$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 0 385 343 237 239 242Probable Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0Known In-guide Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Funding 0 385 343 237 239 242Known Civil Service 0 0 0 0 0 0Probable Civil Service 0 0 0 0 0 0Possible CS 0 0.85 0.75 0.25 0.25 0.25Total Civil Service 0 0.85 0.75 0.25 0.25 0.25Contractor WorkYears 0 0.7 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4

Existing systems: Large Aperture Coating Facility - 4707• Upgrade existing facility to enhance large optic coating

capability

Enable any future system:• Provide coatings for future large aperture optics programs

Customers: Internal: NASAExternal (University Consortiums, National Science Foundation, DOD, NRO)

Dev. Coating Operations

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13

OSP

Decision Point

TMT ProgramTMT Program


Foundation of Projection: External customer requestSource of Funding: External + Center Capital Inv.


Coating provider selected

78


EquipmentVacuum coating fixturing (Rotary)Cleaning tanksCoating sourcesProcess controllersCleanroom upgrades?Etc.Coating material and cleaning suppliesEquipment Maintenance/Repairs




Political: Political: Funding for this program is not firm.Funding for this program is not firm.

Competition: Competition: Possible commercial vendors Possible commercial vendors




Competency Need Dates Availability New Rqmt.(CS/Cont.)

OPTSYS 2Q06-2Q10 CSMANUFACT 2Q06-1Q08 CSENGSCISUP 2Q07-2Q10 Cont.

Workforce Development/Training Requirements:Cleaning and handling of large optics

Building Need Dates Available New Rqmt. Space Type:Large Aperture Coating Facility4707 2Q07-2Q12 Yes

Special Test Facilities/Equipment: Large Aperture Coating Facility4707 2Q07-2Q12 Yes

Response Status:


SOMTC (XD30): 30 Meter Telescope Mirror Coatings

79


Assumptions:

SOMTC(XD30)- Terrestrial Planet Finder




Brief Description• Terrestrial Planet Finder Coronagraph is a visible astronomy

mission to resolve earth size planets orbiting the nearest 150 stars.

Classification: Directed__X__ or Competitive_____. Capture Manager: J. HrabaBus. Dev. Point of Contact: F. WintersCustomer Point of Contact: J. HrabaPartnerships: JPL, GSFCProbability of Occurrence:

Known ____ Probable(>90%)__X__


Existing systems: • expand our astronomical imaging

capabilities• increase our knowledge of the universe

Enable any future system:• larger, more sophisticated

coronagraphs • higher accuracy orbital telescopes

Customers: • JPL, GSFC, Science community

(NASA and external)


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 75 500 600 600 600Probable Funding 25 25 250 300 300 300Known In-guide FundingTotal Funding 25 100 750 900 900 900Known Civil Service Probable Civil Service 0.1 0.25 1 2 2 2Possible CS 0.5 2 4 4 4Total Civil Service 0.1 0.75 3 6 6 6Contractor WorkYears

Foundation of Projection: Project manager forecastSource of Funding: JPL bypass Terrestrial Planet Finder (TPF)

Technology Demonstrator Mirror (TDM)

0302 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15

Technology ProgramTechnology Program

Risk ReductionRisk ReductionTDMTDM

Build SatelliteTPF

OperationsTPF

TPF Program

Decision Point

TPFLaunch

16 17 18 19 20 21 22

TDMComplete

Milestone

80


Equipment N/A

Etc.





Competition: DirectedCompetition: Directed


Link to Agency Strategic Plan: Approved Link to Agency Strategic Plan: Approved MissionMissionLink to Center Core Capability/Mission: OpticsLink to Center Core Capability/Mission: Optics


(CS/Cont.)OPTSYS FY06-FY11 CS No



____4487___ __FY06-FY11 _Yes____ ___No___

__________ __________ ________ _________


____N/A___ __________ _________ __________

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


SOMTC(XD30)- Terrestrial Planet Finder

81


Assumptions:




Existing systems:

Enable any future system:• Formation Flying is a critical enabling technology for multiple future missions including: TPF-I, SI, LF, PI, EUXO, BHI

Customers:• NASA


$K FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 100 100 TBD TBD TBD TBDProbable FundingKnown In-guide FundingTotal Funding 0 100 100 0 0 0 0Known Civil Service 0Probable Civil ServicePossible CS 0.5 0.5Total Civil Service 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0Contractor WorkYears 0

Foundation of Projection: Project manager forecastSource of Funding: GSFCFund Center - WBS:

Brief DescriptionGSFC has test bed to demonstrated elements of formation flying for proposed Stellar Imager mission. Test bed is funded under a ROSS contract. MSFC, GSFC and MIT are proposing to use MSFC Flat Floor to develop a larger test bed. This will be included in GFSC’s ROSES follow-on proposal.Classification: Directed or Competitive _X_. Capture Manager: P. StahlBus. Dev. Point of Contact: TBDCustomer Point of Contact: P. StahlPartnerships: GSFC, MITProbability of Occurrence:

Known Probable(>90%) ____Probable (80<90%) __ Possible % 50 (10,25,50 or 75%)

02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Test BedTest Bed

Key Milestones

> 2025 Launch

SOMTC (XD30): Stellar Imager Formation Flying Test Bed

82


Equipment

Etc.











(CS/Cont.)

___TBD____ __TBD____ ___TBD__ __TBD____

___________ __________ _________ __________



_Flat Floor_ __TBD____ __TBD__ __TBD___

__________ __________ ________ _________


_Flat Floor_ __TBD____ __TBD__ __TBD___

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


83


Assumptions:




Existing systems:

Enable any future system:•Develop optics to enable Constellation X Spectroscopic X-ray Telescope (SXT) and Hard X-ray Telescope (HXT).

Customers:•Science community (NASA and external)


$K FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 55 55 55 55 55 55Probable Funding 86 86 86 86 86 86Known In-guide FundingTotal Funding 0 141 141 141 141 141 141Known Civil Service 0Probable Civil Service 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7Possible CS 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3Total Civil Service 1 1 1 1 1 1Contractor WorkYears 0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2

Foundation of Projection: Project manager forecastSource of Funding: GSFCFund Center - WBS: 62-785-40; 62-785-40-15

Brief DescriptionConstellation X is an x-ray astronomy mission which will have 100X the collecting area in the 1-15 keV energy range of any existing x-ray telescope. As currently envisioned, the mission will consist of 4 orbiting observatories, each of which will be equipped with both a spectroscopic x-ray telescope (SXT) and a hard x-ray telescope (HXT).Classification: Directed X or Competitive_____. Capture Manager: W. JonesBus. Dev. Point of Contact: NACustomer Point of Contact: W. JonesPartnerships: SAO, GSFC, MITProbability of Occurrence:

Known X Probable(>90%) ____Probable (80<90%) __ Possible % 25 (10,25,50 or 75%)

Flt. Mirror Flt. Mirror Dev.Dev.

02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Tech Dev.Tech Dev.

Key Milestones

#1 & #2 Launch

#3 & #4 Launch

S/C Dev.S/C Dev.

OperationsOperations

X-ray Test

Grating Test

(MSFC)

(MSFC)

SOMTC (XD30): Con X

84


Equipment N/A

Etc.







Link to Agency Strategic Plan: Approved Link to Agency Strategic Plan: Approved MissionMissionLink to Center Core Capability/Mission: OpticsLink to Center Core Capability/Mission: Optics


(CS/Cont.)

__OPTSYS_ __FY06-FY11 __CS__ ______No____

___________ __________ _________ __________



__4707____ ___FY06-FY11 _Yes__ __No_____

__4487____ __FY06-FY11_ _Yes___ _No_____


___N/A____ __________ _________ __________

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


SOMTC (XD30): Con X

85


Assumptions:• Budget estimate reflects full cost estimate • Estimates validated by CFO

SOMTC (XD30): Ground Lens Sensor Development



Brief Description• The KSC Ground Camera Lens is being fabricated in response

to CAIB recommendation 3.4-1 to upgrade ground-based imaging to provide at least 3 useful views along any expected launch azimuth. A total of 5 lens will be delivered.

Classification: Directed_X_ or Competitive_____. Capture Manager: W. JonesBus. Dev. Point of Contact: F. WintersCustomer Point of Contact: W. JonesPartnerships: NASA-KSCProbability of Occurrence:

Known __ Probable(>90%)_X_


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0Probable Funding 893 0 0 0 0 0Known In-guide Funding 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Funding 893 0 0 0 0 0Known Civil Service 0.0 0 0 0 0 0Probable Civil Service 3.4 0 0 0 0 0Possible CS 0 0 0 0 0 0Total Civil Service 3.4 0 0 0 0 0Contractor WorkYears 1.8 0 0 0 0 0

Existing systems: • Provide high-resolution imagery during

launch• Will support Space Shuttle and

expendable launches

Enable any future system:• Will upgrade imaging capability for

launches from KSC or ETR

Customers: KSC, USAF-ETR

Space Shuttle

Operations (by KSC)

02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Fund Center – WBS: 62-377; 62-377-10-30-GO

Expendable Launch VehicleFoundation of Projection: MOU & project planSource of Funding: SSPO


Design

Fabrication

86


Equipment: none

Etc.








Link to Agency Strategic Plan: RTF/ShuttleLink to Agency Strategic Plan: RTF/Shuttle

Link to Center Core Capability/Mission: OpticalLink to Center Core Capability/Mission: Optical


(CS/Cont.)

OPTSYS FY06-07 CS NO MANUFACT FY06-07 CS NO MICELM FY06-07 CS NOENGSCISUP FY06-07 CS NO



4487 FY06-07 Yes No

__________ __________ ________ _________


Existing

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:

In work:_______ Submitted: ________ Other: ______

87


Assumptions:• Budget estimate reflects full cost estimate

SOMTC(XD30): BAE Systems

Description of Initiative Description of Initiative Benefits to Doing the WorkBenefits to Doing the Work


Brief Description• Optically design and manufacture a beam redistribution system Classification: Directed__X__ or Competitive_____. Capture Manager: Dr. David LehnerBus. Dev. Point of Contact: NA Customer Point of Contact: BAE SystemsPartnerships: Industrial vendor, Air ForceProbability of Occurrence:


Probable (80<90%) ____ Possible % __50___(10,25,50 or 75%)

$K FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11Possible Funding 0 400 400Probable FundingKnown In-guide FundingTotal Funding 0 400 400Known Civil Service 0 0Probable Civil Service 0 0Possible CS 0 0.3 0.3Total Civil Service 0 0.3 0.3Contractor WorkYears 0 1 1

Existing systems: Enable any future system:

• Technology Advancement

Customers: DOD,NASA,Industry

FY06

Develop Program Plan


Foundation of Projection:Source of Funding: Headquarters/GSFC/JPL/Vendors


Authority to ProceedAuthority to Proceed

Vendors Supplied SamplesVendors Supplied Samples

Sample PrepSample Prep

Test phase 1Test phase 1


Efforts not in parallel

FY07

88


Equipment: None

Etc.





Political: N/A Political: N/A



Link to Agency Strategic Plan: Technology Link to Agency Strategic Plan: Technology Development for ESMDDevelopment for ESMD



(CS/Cont.)

MANUFACT FY06-07 CS No

___________ __________ _________ __________



4487 FY06-07 Yes No__________ __________ ________ _________


None __________ _________ __________

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


89


Assumptions:Out of scope work to ET SE&I in FY05, CAIB result

SOMTC (XD30): ET-ICE



Brief DescriptionDevelop system to prohibit ice buildup at LOX forward

bellows on ET, provide removal if it does form, demon-strate as a laboratory unit, expand to field units.

Classification: Directed__X__ or Competitive_____. Capture Manager: Richard StephensonBus. Dev. Point of Contact:Customer Point of Contact: Tom ByrdPartnerships: ET-MSFC/KSCProbability of Occurrence:


Probable (80<90%) ____ Possible % _75____(10,25,50 or 75%)

Existing systems: None

Enable any future system: Ice Mitigation system for LOX forward

feedline bellows and maybe other points on ET.

Customers: Shuttle program


$K FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11Possible Funding 118 56Probable FundingKnown In-guide FundingTotal Funding 118 56Known Civil Service 0.4 0.4Probable Civil ServicePossible CSTotal Civil Service 0.4 0.4Contractor WorkYears

Foundation of Projection:Source of Funding: Concept Studies

Full Scale Demos

Deliver 3 Field Units

Ice Mitigation via laser power to support Flight 3

Done

FY05 Q3/Q4

FY06

90


Equipment: Lasers

Etc.




Environmental: Laser Safety Environmental: Laser Safety




Link to Agency Strategic Plan: Shuttle/ RTFLink to Agency Strategic Plan: Shuttle/ RTF



(CS/Cont.)

FunPhy Fy06 CS No___________ __________ _________ __________



4487 FY06 Yes No__________ __________ ________ _________


None

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


91



SOMTC(XD30): Silicon Carbide Processing

Description of Initiative Description of Initiative Benefits to Doing the WorkBenefits to Doing the Work


Brief Description• Develop and provide a consistently generated set of data

properties for future mirror applications through NASA Innovative Technology Transfer Program

Classification: Directed____ or Competitive___x__. Capture Manager: Dr. Phil StahlBus. Dev. Point of Contact: Sonny Mitchell Customer Point of Contact: NASA HeadquartersPartnerships: Industrial vendors supplying test samplesProbability of Occurrence:



$K FY05 FY06 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 150Probable Funding 100Known In-guide FundingTotal Funding 150 100Known Civil Service 1.3 1Probable Civil Service 0.2 0.2Possible CS 0 0Total Civil Service 1.5 1.2Contractor WorkYears 0 0

Existing systems: • HST, Glass primary, weight• James Webb Space Telescope, Beryllium,

cost

Enable any future system:• Next Generation from other materials• Light weighted systems• Near net finish of raw product• Data base providing consistently

measured properties

Customers: DOD,NASA,Industry

Develop Program Plan


Foundation of Projection:Source of Funding: Headquarters/GSFC/JPL/Vendors


Headquarters’ ApprovalHeadquarters’ Approval

Vendors Supplied SamplesVendors Supplied Samples

Sample PrepSample Prep



1 mo from 03-01-05

3 mo

3 mo

2 mo

9 mo

Completed

Efforts not in parallel

92


Equipment: Existing

Etc.




Environmental: NoneEnvironmental: None




Link to Agency Strategic Plan: Material Link to Agency Strategic Plan: Material development for future missionsdevelopment for future missions



(CS/Cont.)

FUNPhy FY06 CS NoMatEng FY06 CS NoEngscisup FY06 CS No

___________ __________ _________ __________



4487 FY06 Yes No__________ __________ ________ _________


Existing__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


93



SOMTC (XD30): JWST




Brief Description• JWST is a next-generation successor to the Hubble Space Telescope

scheduled to Launch in 2011. MSFC is responsible for providing 1) technical and programmatic management for JWST Primary Mirror Technology development and cryogenic optical testing 2.) Optical Telescope Element (OTE) technical and programmatic consultation and oversight/iinsight, and 3) optically testing JWST primary mirror segments at cryogenic temperatures.

Classification: Directed____ or Competitive_X___. Capture Manager: Kevin RussellBus. Dev. Point of Contact: N/ACustomer Point of Contact: Lee FeinbergPartnerships: GSFC/UAH/SAOProbability of Occurrence: Known ____ Probable(>90%)_X___


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 2,917 2,318 479 301 308Probable Funding 2,803Known In-guide FundingTotal Funding 2,803 2,917 2,318 479 301 308Known Civil Service 0 0 0 0 0 0Probable Civil Service 16.2 0 0 0 0 0Possible CS 0 16.2 12.2 2.5 1.5 1.5Total Civil Service 16.2 16.2 12.2 2.5 1.5 1.5Contractor WorkYears 0.6 0.7 0.7 0 0 0

Existing systems: Replaces Hubble

Enable any future system:• Large Optic Development.

Customers: Space Sciences, GSFC, Ball Aerospace

04 05 06




Tech Development and Risk Reduction

JWST NAR

JWST Primary Mirror EDU

Flight Mirrors Fab and Cryo Test

07 08 09

94


Equipment

Etc.



Environmental: N/AEnvironmental: N/APolitical: JWST is an Agency High profile Political: JWST is an Agency High profile project. Heighten schedule pressure due to project. Heighten schedule pressure due to Hubble servicing mission cancellationHubble servicing mission cancellationCompetition: JWST Segment Test Selected Competition: JWST Segment Test Selected Based on MSFC ProposalBased on MSFC ProposalPast Capture Rate:Past Capture Rate:Link to Agency Strategic Plan: Mission II, Goal Link to Agency Strategic Plan: Mission II, Goal 5, Objectives 5.7-5.11 (Space Science, SEU 5, Objectives 5.7-5.11 (Space Science, SEU Theme)Theme)Link to Center Core Capability/Mission: OpticsLink to Center Core Capability/Mission: Optics


(CS/Cont.)

PROJPROGMT FY06-FY11 CS NOTESTENG FY06-FY09 CS NOENGSCISUP FY06-FY09 CS NO



___4718___ ___FY06-FY11 __Yes__ ___No______

__________ __________ ________ _________


___XRCF_ __________ _________ __________

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


SOMTC (XD30): JWST

95


Assumptions:Budget estimate reflects full cost estimate

SOMTC (XD30): Thin Disk Laser




Brief DescriptionSOMTC will design and fabricate a 125 watt Thin Disk

Laser. Expected completion date is summer 2005.

Classification: Directed_x___ or Competitive_____. Capture Manager: XD32/ Dr. Tommy L. ThompsonBus. Dev. Point of Contact: N/ACustomer Point of Contact: TBDPartnerships: SOMTC, UAH, and SMDCProbability of Occurrence:

Known ____ Probable(>90%) ____

Probable (80<90%) ____ Possible % _50__(10,25,50 or 75%)

Existing systems: A Preliminary Design Review (PDR) of the Thin Disk Laser has been completed. A Critical Design Review (CDR) is scheduled for 03/31/05.

•Enable any future system: Enabling Enabling technology for formation flying and large technology for formation flying and large interferometersinterferometers

Customers: NASA Programs and industrial partners


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 870 984 1,033 1,326 1,540 1,654Probable FundingKnown In-guide FundingTotal Funding 870 984 1,033 1,326 1,540 1654Known Civil Service Probable Civil Service 2 3 3 3 3 3Possible CS 3 3 3 3 3 3Total Civil Service 5 6 6 6 6 6Contractor WorkYears 1 1 3 5 6 7

Foundation of Projection: External Customer RequestSource of Funding: In Process 1KW

10K W

100 KW

05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13

125W

96


Equipment:Laboratory spacePower SuppliesInterlocksCleanroom upgradesProcess Controllers

Etc.Licenses for the Thin Disk Laser

SOMTC (XD30): Thin Disk Laser



Environmental: Laser SafetyEnvironmental: Laser SafetyPolitical: N/APolitical: N/ACompetition: Dr. Adolf Giesen (University Competition: Dr. Adolf Giesen (University of Stuttgart) likes collaborating with NASA. of Stuttgart) likes collaborating with NASA. Past Capture Rate:Past Capture Rate:

Link to Agency Strategic Plan: Enabling Link to Agency Strategic Plan: Enabling technology for formation flying and large technology for formation flying and large interferometersinterferometersLink to Center Core Capability/Mission: Link to Center Core Capability/Mission: OpticsOptics


(CS/Cont.)

Program Mgr. 2Q06-2Q12 CS No

Technical Lead 2Q06-2Q12 CS No

Mech. Design 2Q06-2Q12 CS No

Technicians 2Q07-2Q12 CS No __________ _________ __________Workforce Development/Training Requirements:Laser Safety Training


NSSTC Laser Lab2Q06-2Q12___Yes______ No __________ ________ _________


NSSTC Laser Lab_ 2Q06-2Q12 Yes __________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


97



SOMTC (XD30): SAFIR




Brief DescriptionSAFIR is the Single Aperture Far InfraRed Telescope. This

is a vision mission that operates at 4 degrees Kelvin.

Classification: Directed____ or Competitive__X___. Capture Manager: Phil StahlBus. Dev. Point of Contact: N/ACustomer Point of Contact: TBDPartnerships: University of Texas, GSFCProbability of Occurrence:


Probable (80<90%) _X___ Possible % ___(10,25,50 or 75%)

Existing systems:

•Enable any future system: Follow-on infrared version of JWST with a 10M aperture

Customers: NASA


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 770 870 1,540 956Probable FundingKnown In-guide FundingTotal Funding 870 984 1,033 1,326 1,540 1654Known Civil Service Probable Civil Service 3 3 4 2Possible CS 2 2 6 2Total Civil Service 5 5 10 4Contractor WorkYears 2 2

Foundation of Projection: External Customer RequestSource of Funding: In Process

02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Launch

Prime Contract Award

Enabling Technology Development Programs

XRCF Testing

98


Equipment: Update of existing equipment

Etc.

SOMTC (XD30): SAFIR



Environmental: N/AEnvironmental: N/APolitical: N/APolitical: N/ACompetition: TBDCompetition: TBDPast Capture Rate:Past Capture Rate:

Link to Agency Strategic Plan: Vision Link to Agency Strategic Plan: Vision MissionMissionLink to Center Core Capability/Mission: Link to Center Core Capability/Mission: OpticsOptics


(CS/Cont.)

Program Mgr. FY08-FY20 CS No

Technical Lead FY08-FY20 CS No

Technicians FY10-FY14 CS No __________ _________ __________Workforce Development/Training Requirements:


4487 FY08-FY20___Yes______ No 4718 FY10-FY17 Yes No


Existing___ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


99



SOMTC (XD30): WAVE II




Brief DescriptionMid Infrared version of the Wave Airborne Sensor Package

for the WB57.

Classification: Directed__X__ or Competitive_____. Capture Manager: John WestBus. Dev. Point of Contact: N/ACustomer Point of Contact: JSCPartnerships: N/AProbability of Occurrence:


Probable (80<90%) _X___ Possible % ___(10,25,50 or 75%)

Existing systems: WAVE I

•Enable any future systems: To be used for night launches and landings

Customers: NASA/JSC/Shuttle


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible FundingProbable Funding 1,000 357Known In-guide FundingTotal Funding 1,000 357Known Civil Service Probable Civil Service 3.5 2Possible CSTotal Civil Service 3.5 2Contractor WorkYears 0.75 0.5

Foundation of Projection: External Customer RequestSource of Funding: In Process

05 06 07

Design

Fabricate

Test and Integrate

100


Equipment: Existing equipment

Etc.

SOMTC (XD30): WAVE II



Environmental: N/AEnvironmental: N/APolitical: N/APolitical: N/ACompetition: N/ACompetition: N/APast Capture Rate: 100%Past Capture Rate: 100%

Link to Agency Strategic Plan: Return to Link to Agency Strategic Plan: Return to FlightFlightLink to Center Core Capability/Mission: Link to Center Core Capability/Mission: OpticsOptics


(CS/Cont.)

Program Mgr. FY05-06 CS No

Technical Lead FY05-FY06 CS No

Technicians FY06-FY06 CS No __________ _________ __________Workforce Development/Training Requirements:


4487 FY05-FY06___Yes______ No


Existing Environmental Test Equipment __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


101



Exploration Science and Technology Division – XD40

Organization: XD40Author: Jeff MayoProgram Manager: Dr. Raymond G. Clinton Date: March 25, 2005

102



Business Initiative: MSG




Brief Description

Classification: Directed__X__ or Competitive_____. Capture Manager: Corky ClintonBus. Dev. Point of Contact: UnknownCustomer Point of Contact: Mark RogersPartnerships: European Space Agency (ESA)Probability of Occurrence:



Existing systems: Providing Science Return for the Utilization of the International Space Station Alpha Laboratory

Enable any future system: Potential for hosting Exploration based Science inboard ISS.

Customers: ESMD, Various US based Principal investigators, and balance of US?ESA barter agreement for ISS crew time and ESA built hardware.


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 12,684 11,923 11,950 12,370 12,563 12,939Probable FundingKnown In-guide FundingTotal Funding 12,684 11,923 11,950 12,370 12,563 12,939Known Civil Service Probable Civil ServicePossible CS 19.25 17.6 16 15.5 15.5 15.5Total Civil Service 19.25 17.6 16 15.5 15.5 15.5Contractor WorkYears 31.55 31.35 31.25 31.25 31.25 31.25

Foundation of Projection: POP Guidelines f NASA HQSource of Funding:ESMD

International Space Station Payload Manifest: MSG payload traffic based on ISS payload traffic model. All milestones track the NASA JSC integration template and deliverables.

MSG Payload Integration& Operations: Payload traffic controlled by NASA HSRT office. Potential for hosting Exploration based Science inboard ISS.

MSG Facility : Providing Science Return for the Utilization of the International Space Station Alpha Laboratory with continuous operational readiness for the life of ISS.

103


Equipment: Microgravity Clean room test equipment, MSFC Telescience Center Control Room, HOSC, MSG

engineering unit and the Payload rack checkout unit.





Political: ISS Utilization BudgetPolitical: ISS Utilization Budget

Competition: CEV $’sCompetition: CEV $’s

Past Capture Rate: ?Past Capture Rate: ?

Link to Agency Strategic Plan: YesLink to Agency Strategic Plan: Yes

Link to Center Core Capability/Mission: YesLink to Center Core Capability/Mission: Yes


(CS/Cont.)This is current on going MSFC work.

Workforce Development/Training Requirements:ISS payload Ops certification MSG Team certification


__4610____ __Now_____ __yes___ ___no_____

4493 Now yes no__________ __________ ________


___4493 Microgravity Development Lab __________

Response Status:

Inwork:_______ Submitted: Other: _Current Work_____

104


Assumptions:

Business Initiative: ADVANCED MATERIAL FOR EXPLORATION




Brief Description

Classification: Directed__X__ or Competitive_____. Capture Manager:Bus. Dev. Point of Contact:Customer Point of Contact: Beth CookPartnerships: Department of DefenseProbability of Occurrence:



Existing systems:


Customers:


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible FundingProbable FundingKnown In-guide Funding 1438 1900 1976 2055 2137 2223Total Funding 1438 1900 1976 2055 2137 2223Known Civil Service 4 4 4 4 4 4Probable Civil ServicePossible CSTotal Civil Service 4 4 4 4 4 4Contractor WorkYears 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00

Foundation of Projection: Bottoms-Up EstimateSource of Funding: ESMD

105


Equipment: N/A

Etc. N/A











(CS/Cont.)(See Attachment)________ __________ _________ __________

___________ __________ _________ __________


Building Need Dates Available New Rqmt. Space Type:__________ __________ ________ _________

_Office____ __________ ________ _________

Special Test Facilities/Equipment: N/A

__________ __________ _________ __________

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:

Inwork:___X____ Submitted: ________ Other: ______

106


Labor Code Org. Code Competency Code FTE

62-101-15-41 XD40 Advanced Materials and Processing Science 65 0.162-101-15-40 XD42 Fundamental Physics 42 162-101-15-40 SP32 Fundamental Physics 42 0.262-101-15-41 XD42 Fundamental Physics 42 0.5562-101-15-41 SP32 Fundamental Physics 42 0.262-101-15-42 XD42 Fundamental Physics 42 0.662-101-15-43 XD42 Fundamental Physics 42 0.2562-101-15-44 XD42 Fundamental Physics 42 0.562-101-15-47 XD42 Fundamental Physics 42 0.962-101-15-40 EM40 Materials Science and Engineering 66 0.262-101-15-40 EM30 Materials Science and Engineering 66 0.262-101-15-40 EM50 Materials Science and Engineering 66 0.162-101-15-42 EM20 Materials Science and Engineering 66 0.262-101-15-42 EM50 Materials Science and Engineering 66 0.2562-101-15-40 XD02 Program/Project Analysis 147 0.562-101-15-40 XD41 Program/Project Management 122 162-101-15-40 EV23 Sensors & Data Acquisition - Aeronautics 20 0.262-101-15-42 EV23 Sensors & Data Acquisition - Aeronautics 20 0.362-101-15-43 NP12 Thermal Systems 104 0

TOTAL 7.25

107


Assumptions:

Business Initiative: AIM




Brief Description Advanced Integration Matrix (AIM) which is now called Life Support and Habitation Systems Engineering (LSH-SE) is a multi-center team developing SE processes and procedures for the Human Systems Research and Technology Directorate within ESMD.

Classification: Directed__X__ or Competitive_____. Capture Manager: Tim SmithBus. Dev. Point of Contact: Brian BrantleyCustomer Point of Contact: Carl WalzPartnerships: Multi-Center ActivityProbability of Occurrence: Know__X__Probable(>90%)____

Probable (80<90%) ____ Possible % 75__(10,25,50 or 75%)

Existing systems: (ISFR, ISRU, ALS technology development projects) Gives MSFC the opportunity to shape the definition of process and procedures in SE that we will have to meet in working future ESMD projects.Enable any future system: SE processes will impact all future technology development and flight projects in future spirals that support HSRT in meeting ESMD requirements. Modeling and simulation proposal adds expertise to early development projects already in work.Customers: Life Support and Habitation Carl Walz, within Human Systems Research and Technology Directorate, Gene Trinh in supporting the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 1,164 1,442 1,490 1,547 1,599 276Probable FundingKnown In-guide Funding 1,735 1,855 1,884 1,938 1,930 1,968Total Funding 2,899 3,297 3,374 3,485 3,529 2,244Known Civil Service 2 2 2 2 2 2Probable Civil ServicePossible CS 2 2 2 2 2 0

Total Civil Service 4 4 4 4 4 2Contractor WorkYears 9 10 10 10 10 7


108


Equipment None

Etc.




Environmental: n/aEnvironmental: n/aPolitical: Supporting our HQ customer in Political: Supporting our HQ customer in developing their processes and systems developing their processes and systems positions MSFC to be aware of new work.positions MSFC to be aware of new work.Potential for facilitating flow down of CEV Potential for facilitating flow down of CEV requirements to technology development requirements to technology development projects.projects.Competition: n/aCompetition: n/aPast Capture Rate: n/aPast Capture Rate: n/aLink to Agency Strategic Plan:Link to Agency Strategic Plan:Link to Center Core Capability/Mission:Link to Center Core Capability/Mission:


(CS/Cont.)__SysEngr 10/05 3

___________ __________ _________ __________

Workforce Development/Training Requirements: None


__None___ __________ ________ _________

__________ __________ ________ _________


___None___ __________ _________ __________

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


109


Assumptions:

Business Initiative: MSRR




Brief DescriptionMSRR (Ongoing) 62-127

Classification: Directed___X_ or Competitive_____. Capture Manager:Bus. Dev. Point of Contact: Customer Point of Contact: ESMDPartnerships: Probability of Occurrence:

Known _X___ Probable(>90%)____


Existing systems:

Enable any future system:• NASA materials science research in

support of exploration

Customers:• ESA


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible FundingProbable FundingKnown In-guide Funding13,526 8,425 4,239 3,966 4,020 4,181Total Funding 13,526 8,425 4,239 3,966 4,020 4,181Known Civil Service 34.3 12.35 6.95 5.95 5.95 5.95Probable Civil ServicePossible CSTotal Civil Service 34.3 12.35 6.95 5.95 5.95 5.95Contractor WorkYears 18.3 12.2 6.4 5.4 5.4 5.4


FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10Ground Hardware AvailableFlight Hardware AvailableFacility Launch Date

Facility On-Orbit Commissioning

110


Equipment

Etc.





Political:Political:• Completion of MSRR-1 facility is tied to a Letter of Completion of MSRR-1 facility is tied to a Letter of

Agreement between NASA and ESAAgreement between NASA and ESA






(CS/Cont.)

_(SEE ATTACHMENT)__________ __________ _________ __________

___________ __________ _________ __________



__________ __________ ________ _________

__________ __________ ________ _________


__________ __________ _________ __________

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


111


MSRR - Compentencies

Competency Type FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11Acquistion and Contract Management Average 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0Computer Systems and Engineering Average 2.4Configuration Management Average 2.0Electrical and Electronic Systems Average 1.0Electromagnetics Average 2.3Flight and Ground Data Systems Average 2.45 2.45 1.6 0.6 0.6 0.6Human Factors Engineering Average 0.8Integration Engineering Average 5.15Mechanical Systems Average 0.7Para-Professional Business Operations Average 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Program/Project Analysis Average 1 1 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75Program/Project Management Average 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Project Work & Team Management Average 1.5 1 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7Safety Engineering and Assurance Average 2.5 2.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5Software Engineering Average 3.1Structural Systems Average 1Systems Engineering Average 5.1 3.5 2 2 2 2Test Engineering Average 1.4Thermal Systems Average 1

TOTAL 35.3 12.4 7.0 6.0 6.0 6.0

112


Assumptions:• Budget estimate reflects full cost estimate• Known is consistent with POP05 Guidelines

Business Initiative: LOCAD


Budget – (In Full Cost)Budget – (In Full Cost) Key Milestones we commit to with the BudgetKey Milestones we commit to with the Budget

Brief Description•Deploy LOCAD-PTS on ISS and evaluate its capabilities for microbial assessments of the space environment.•Support Advanced Environmental Monitoring and Control activities through development of applicable microfluidic technologies.

Classification: Directed_X_ or Competitive___X__. Capture Manager: Ginger Flores, LOCAD PM, SY10Bus. Dev. Point of Contact: N/ACustomer Point of Contact: AEMC Program Partnerships: Army MEMS facility, MBL, CIW Probability of Occurrence:

Known X Probable(>90%)____

Probable (80<90%) ____ Possible % 75%(10,25,50 or 75%)

Existing and future systems:


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 3900 3200 3200 4400 5000 5200Probable FundingKnown In-guide Funding 6130 6350 6070 5829 6589 6853Total Funding 10030 9550 9270 10229 11589 12053Known Civil Service 6.30 6.30 6.30 6.30 6.30 6.30Probable Civil ServicePossible CS 3.60 2.00 2.00 4.00 5.00 5.00Total Civil Service 9.90 8.30 8.30 10.30 11.30 11.30Contractor WorkYears 19.20 16.50 13.30 13.30 18.60 19.60

Foundation of Projection: Bottoms Up Estimate

Source of Funding: ESMD

Key Milestones – all years Estimated to Complete Q(FY)

Microfluidic Chip for Microbial Detection (LAL & ATP Assay)

4Q 2005

LOC Handheld Analyzer Prototype-Ground

2Q 2006

Fly LOCAD-PTS 2Q 2006

Fly PTS Cartridge-ATP Assay 4Q 2008

Fly gram+/-, Yeast and Mold Cartridges

3Q 2007

PTS Air Sampling Unit-Ground 4Q 2007

Fly PTS Air Sample Collection Unit 4Q 2008

Enabling technology for Exploration that provides low mass, power, and volume (e.g., handheld) bio-analytical and environmental instrumentation. Enables development of integrated-function chip products for:

•AEMC - Handheld Monitoring Units & Chips (including LOCAD Portable Test System (LOCAD PTS) for microbial monitoring of air, water, and surfaces•Medical Diagnostics - Handheld Bio Fluid Monitor & Chips (blood, urine, saliva, sweat, tears analysis) for crew health monitoring•Remote Exploration - Life Detection on Mars [Modular Assay for Solar System Exploration (MASSE) project, Astrobiology Science and Technology Instrument Development (ASTID) & Astrobiology Science and Technology for Exploring Planets (ASTEP) programs]

•Planetary Protection/Microbial Detection (ASTID funded)

113


Equipment

Etc.




Environmental: Environmental: Applicable to terrestrial environmental Applicable to terrestrial environmental monitoring as well as planetary protection.monitoring as well as planetary protection.

Political: Political: Applications in Homeland Security.Applications in Homeland Security.

Competition:Competition:Past Capture Rate:Past Capture Rate:Link to Agency Strategic Plan: Link to Agency Strategic Plan: LOCAD LOCAD technologies are directly linked to NASA’s strategic technologies are directly linked to NASA’s strategic objectives (i.e. Human/Robotic Solar System (SS) objectives (i.e. Human/Robotic Solar System (SS) exploration; Extended human presence across the SS; exploration; Extended human presence across the SS; Develop innovative technologies; Promote int’l/commercial Develop innovative technologies; Promote int’l/commercial

participation for US interests).participation for US interests). Link to Center Core Capability/Mission:Link to Center Core Capability/Mission:


__________ __________ ________ _________

__________ __________ ________ _________


__________ __________ _________ __________

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


See Attached Slide

114


WorkForce EI03 Integration Engineering 0.10

EI11 Design and Development Engineering 0.05

EI13 Thermal Systems 0.04

EI52 Test Engineering 0.12

EM03 Materials Science and Engineering 0.00

EM03 Materials Integration Engineering 0.20


EM10 Engineering and Science Support 0.01

EM10 Materials Test Engineering 0.08

EM10 Professional Administrative Operations 0.01

EO30 Flight and Ground Data Systems 0.20

ER42 Rocket Propulsion 0.20

ER43 Thermal Systems 0.20

EV51 Environmental Control and Life Support Systems 0.15

ps50 Acquistion and Contract Management 0.50

RS20 Financial Management 0.50

SP12 Technical Work & Team Management 0.50

SP32 Systems Engineering 1.00

SY10 Program/Project Management 0.50

sy10 Program/Project Management 1.50

115


Assumptions:• Budget estimate reflects full cost estimate• Known is consistent with POP05 Guidelines

Business Initiative: ISRU




Brief DescriptionDetermine & assess ESMD Lunar and Martian Simulant Materials Determine & assess ESMD Lunar and Martian Simulant Materials needs. Develop chemical and other processes to extract, refine & needs. Develop chemical and other processes to extract, refine & transform lunar & Martian regoliths and Martian atmosphere into transform lunar & Martian regoliths and Martian atmosphere into needed productsneeded productsClassification: Directed__X__ or Competitive_____. Capture Manager: Raymond A. French/SY10Bus. Dev. Point of Contact: N/ACustomer Point of Contact: ESMD/ESRT/LSH (Carl Walz)Partnerships: N/AProbability of Occurrence:Known __X__ Probable(>90%)____ Probable (80<90%) ____ Possible % __75___(10,25,50 or 75%)

Existing systems: • Supports other existing funded projects/activities

• ISFR Projects, EVA Systems, RESOLVE Project & other BAA & ICP Awards

Enable any future system:• ISRU Rich Lunar and Martian Surface Systems

• EVA, ECLSS, Habitat Structures, In Situ Fab & Repair• Products

• Lunar & Martian Regolith Simulant Materials & Standards, O2, Buffer Gases, H2O, In Situ Metals & Silicon, Glass & Ceramics

Customers:• See Above


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 3310 3780 4470 4950 5330 6040Probable FundingKnown In-guide Funding 9346 10562 10559 10742 8994 9354Total Funding 12656 14342 15029 15692 14324 15394Known Civil Service 18.20 21.20 22.20 22.20 19.20 19.20Probable Civil ServicePossible CS 5.50 6.50 8.00 8.50 7.50 8.00Total Civil Service 23.70 27.70 30.20 30.70 26.70 27.20Contractor WorkYears 25.80 26.30 27.30 25.80 23.30 12.00

Foundation of Projection: Bottoms Up Estimate

Source of Funding: ESMD

Key Milestones Estimated to Complete Q(FY)

Lunar Regolith Simulant Materials Workshop

2Q FY05

Initial Technology Downselect 4Q FY05

Research and Technology Studies 2Q FY06

Downselect Technology Trade Studies 4Q FY08

Selected TRL 3-4 Priorities Complete 4Q FY08

Metal Feedstock Process Field Demo 4Q FY08

116


Equipment

Etc.







Past Capture Rate: Past Capture Rate:



See next slide Building Need Dates Available New Rqmt. Space Type:

__________ __________ ________ _________

__________ __________ ________ _________


__________ __________ _________ __________

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


117


Workforce Needed

Workforce EI01 Manufacturing Engineering 0.05

EI50 Technical Work & Team Management 0.04

EI50 Professional Administrative Operations 0.04

EI52 Test Engineering 1.06

EI52 Flight and Ground Data Systems 0.40

EI52 Technical Work & Team Management 0.06

EM10 Materials Test Engineering 0.10


EM40 Non-metallics 0.40

ER32 Combustion Devices Design and Analysis 0.10

ER42 Propellant Management Systems Design and Analysis 0.20

EV51 Environmental Control and Life Support Systems 0.10

ps50 Contract Formation 0.50

RS20 Financial Management 0.50

SP12 Technical Management 0.50

SP33 Systems Engineering 1.00

SP33 Technical Work & Team Management 0.20

SY10 Program/Project Management 1.00

XD41 Program/Project Management 0.40

XD42 Advanced Materials and Processing Science 1.95

XD42 Chemistry/ Chemical Engineering 0.50

XD42 Cell & Molecular Biology 0.50

118


Assumptions:Based on Life Support and Habitation Marks.

Business Initiative: 6.1.8.1 Divisional Support




Brief Description

Classification: Directed__x__ or Competitive_____. Capture Manager:Bus. Dev. Point of Contact: Customer Point of Contact: Partnerships: Probability of Occurrence:

Known __x__ Probable(>90%)____

Probable (80<90%) ____ Possible % ___75__(10,25,50 or 75%)

Existing systems: This is support for the Exploration Science and Technology Division.


Customers: ESMD


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 2718 7936 10508Probable FundingKnown In-guide Funding 15500 15950 15758 13644 8915 7156Total Funding 15500 15950 15758 16362 16851 17664Known Civil Service 26 26 26 21.7 13.8 10.5Probable Civil ServicePossible CS 4.3 12.2 15.5Total Civil Service 26 26 26 26 26 26Contractor WorkYears 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.8


119


Equipment

Etc.











(CS/Cont.)

___________ __________ _________ __________

___________ __________ _________ __________



__________ __________ ________ _________

__________ __________ ________ _________


__________ __________ _________ __________

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


120


Assumptions: WYEs are in-guide, on-site only.Funding includes funds to be sent to other centers

Business Initiative: Radiation Shielding




Brief DescriptionBaseline Radiation Shielding Program plus potential zero base

review activities (improve TRL, dosimetry, high spatial resolution, life systems, and SRSP support)

Classification: Directed___X_ or Competitive_____. Capture Manager:Bus. Dev. Point of Contact:Customer Point of Contact:Partnerships: Probability of Occurrence:


Probable (80<90%) ____ Possible % __75__(10,25,50 or 75%)

Existing systems:


Customers:


$K FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY 11Possible Funding 8,450 10,000 11,275 12,050 11,450 10,675Probable FundingKnown In-guide Funding 25,397 26,977 32,359 32,612 32,678 33,658Total Funding 33,847 36,977 43,634 44,662 44,128 44,333Known Civil Service 19.75 19.75 19.75 19.75 19.75 19.75Probable Civil ServicePossible CS 19.70 22.70 23.20 24.00 25.00 19.00Total Civil Service 39.45 42.45 42.95 43.75 44.75 38.75Contractor WorkYears 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5

Foundation of Projection: Bottoms-up estimateSource of Funding: ESMD

Milestones:End 2008 – Nuclear Data Base CompleteEnd 2009 – Transport Code Dev. Complete

Deliverables:Early 2011 – Spiral 1 Design ToolsEarly 2012 – Multifunctional Shielding Materials SpecificationsEarly 2013 – Spiral 2/3 Design ToolsMid 2015 – Spiral 4/5 Design Tools

121


Equipment

Etc.











(CS/Cont.)See next slide __________ __________ __________

___________ __________ _________ __________



__________ __________ ________ _________

__________ __________ ________ _________


__________ __________ _________ __________

__________ __________ __________ __________

Response Status:


122


FY05 CWC - Radiation Civil Servant Skills

62-101-15-60 62-101-15-65 EV24 Pow er Systems 75 0.1 0.162-101-15-60 62-101-15-65 EV12 Systems Engineering 7 0.1 0.162-101-15-60 62-101-15-65 EI51 Engineering and Science Support 11 0.2 0.262-101-15-60 62-101-15-63 EI51 Electrical and Electronic Systems 13 0.1 0.162-101-15-60 62-101-15-65 EI51 Electrical and Electronic Systems 13 1.95 1.9562-101-15-60 62-101-15-63 EI51 Mechanical Systems 17 0.5 0.562-101-15-60 62-101-15-65 EI51 Mechanical Systems 17 1.5 1.562-101-15-60 62-101-15-63 EI31 Flight and Ground Data Systems 19 0.6 0.662-101-15-60 62-101-15-65 EI51 Manufacturing Engineering 24 0.2 0.262-101-15-60 62-101-15-61 XD12 Astronomy and Astrophysics 52 0.4 0.462-101-15-60 62-101-15-62 XD12 Astronomy and Astrophysics 52 0.2 0.262-101-15-60 62-101-15-63 XD12 Astronomy and Astrophysics 52 1.3 1.362-101-15-60 62-101-15-65 XD12 Astronomy and Astrophysics 52 1.4 1.462-101-15-60 62-101-15-70 XD12 Astronomy and Astrophysics 52 0.3 0.362-101-15-60 62-101-15-65 EI51 Computer Systems and Engineering 80 1.1 1.162-101-15-60 62-101-15-62 XD12 Mathematical Modeling & Analysis 86 0.4 0.462-101-15-60 62-101-15-65 XD12 Mathematical Modeling & Analysis 86 0.2 0.262-101-15-60 62-101-15-65 EV34 Thermal Systems 104 0.5 0.562-101-15-60 62-101-15-70 XD41 Program/Project Management 122 2 262-101-15-60 62-101-15-70 XD40 Program/Project Management 122 1 162-101-15-60 62-101-15-65 SX10 Program/Project Management 122 1 162-101-15-60 62-101-15-70 SY10 Program/Project Management 122 2 262-101-15-60 62-101-15-70 ps30 Acquistion and Contract Management 124 0.5 0.562-101-15-60 62-101-15-70 XD02 Program/Project Analysis 147 1 162-101-15-60 62-101-15-65 SX10 Project Work & Team Management 173 0.1 0.162-101-15-60 62-101-15-60 EM40 Materials Test Engineering 1038 0.1 0.162-101-15-60 62-101-15-64 EM40 Materials Test Engineering 1038 0.5 0.562-101-15-60 62-101-15-67 EM40 Materials Test Engineering 1038 0.3 0.362-101-15-60 62-101-15-70 EM40 Materials Test Engineering 1038 0.2 0.2

19.75

FY05 CWC - Radiation Civil Servant Skills

Science and Technology Directorate MSFC 1 MSFC Business Base Forecast Science and Technology...

Documents

Transcript of Science and Technology Directorate MSFC 1 MSFC Business Base Forecast Science and Technology...