Schwietzke s 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_24
-
Upload
ingrid-le-ru -
Category
Science
-
view
286 -
download
0
Transcript of Schwietzke s 20150708_1730_upmc_jussieu_-_amphi_24
2
Stefan Schwietzke1,2, Owen Sherwood2, Pieter P. Tans1,
Sylvia Englund Michel2, Giuseppe Etiope3, Artur Ionescu4,
John B. Miller1,2, Edward J. Dlugokencky1, Lori M. P. Bruhwiler1,
Victoria A. Arling2
1NOAA/GMD Boulder, 2Univ. of Colorado Boulder, 3INGV Italy, 4Babes-Bolyai Univ. Romania
Funding: National Research Council RAP, CIRES IRP
Global methane budget and natural gas leakage
based on long-term δ13CH4 measurements and
updated isotopic source signatures
2
2
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Uncertainties in attribution of global CH4 sources
Photo sources: Wikimedia
• Based on atmospheric measurements of CH4, δ13CH4, and/or C2H6
Mikaloff et al. 2004
(illustrative)
Bousquet et al. 2006
(illustrative)
2
3
-48
-47.5
-47
-46.5
-46
19851989199319972001200520092013
Globalannualm
ean
δ13C(‰
)
Year
Confidence in observational and δ13C signature constraints
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
1550
1600
1650
1700
1750
1800
1850
19851989
1993
1997
2001
2005
2009
2013
GlobalCH4fluxes(Tg/year)
Globalannualm
ean
CH4(ppb)
Year
Global mean CH4 mixing ratio and flux
Global δ13CH4 observations δ13CH4 source signatures
CH4 lifetime
9.4 ± 0.3 years
(9.1 ± 0.9
years)
Uncertainties ± 0.1‰
incl. site-selection bias
NOAA Global GHG Reference Network
• Only few published
global estimates
• Uncertainties not well
characterized
• New analysis in this work
2
4
Mass balance of 3 CH4 source categories
-53‰ -47‰
(Obs.)
“Other”
Wetlands,
ruminants,
rice, landfills,
termites
Isotopic fractionation
Biomass
burning
Oil/gas,
coal
• Global δ13CH4 signature database for the different CH4 sources
• Monte Carlo simulation
- Propagation of all uncertainties in source allocation
Total CH4
isotopically more depleted isotopically more enriched
2
5
Global δ13CH4 source signature literature database developm. (1)
Sample
size
Sample percentage of
global production
Oil/Ga
s 3,085 40%
Coal 660 58%
Oil/Gas Coal Oil/Gas,
Coal Quay et al.
1999 Miller
2005
Fossil fuels, this work
GLOREG
(Global Reservoir Gas
data-set)
2
6
Sample size Sample regions
Biomass
burning 11 Boreal, temperate, tropical
Other* 70 5 continents, 13 countries * Wetlands, ruminants,
rice, landfills, termites
Quay et al.
1999 Miller
2005
Biomass
burning
This
work
Quay et al.
1999 Miller
2005
This
work
Other
Global δ13CH4 source signature literature database developm. (2)
2
7
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
1985
1989
1993
1997
2001
2005
2009
2013
GlobalCH4emissions(Tg/yr)
Year
Other(Wetlands,Ruminants,Rice,Landfills,Termites)
Oil/Gas,Coal
Results: fossil fuel CH4 higher than most previous estimates
Literature range of Oil/Gas, Coal
(incl. geolog. seeps)
2
8
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
1985
1989
1993
1997
2001
2005
2009
2013
GlobalCH4emissions(Tg/yr)
Year
Literature range of Oil/Gas, Coal
–45‰ (this study)
Other
Oil/Gas, Coal
–40‰ (Quay et al. 1999, Miller 2005)
Strong influence of oil/gas, coal δ13CH4 signature on emissions
2
9
0 50 100 150 200 250
δOther
τ
ε
BBemissions
δBB
δFossilfuels
Soilsink
GlobalFFemissionsin2011(TgCH4/yr)
FF CH4 emissions sensitivity analysis
C.I. (10, 90th
Percentiles)
-59, -63 ‰
10.0, 8.2 yr
-7.1, -5.5 ‰
55, 32 Tg/yr
-20, -32 ‰
-44.7, -46.5 ‰
34, 30 Tg/yr
δ Other
τ
ε
BB emissions
δ BB
δ Fossil fuels
Soil sink
Parameters
Median
*
*
2
10
ALT
Inter-hemispheric gradient test: preliminary TM5 results
Measurement sites
BR
W
CB
A
UU
M
AZ
R
TA
P
WIS
KE
Y
MLO
RP
B
CH
R
SE
Y
AS
C
EIC
CR
Z
SP
O
(annual mean 2001)
2
11
Paleo test – same parameter distributions as 1984-2013
• Geological seeps: 15–100 Tg/yr
• Pre-industrial δ13CH4 (ice core) measurements and biomass burning emissions
from Ferretti et al. 2005
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
50 200350
500
650
800
950
110
0125
0140
0155
0170
0185
0200
0
GlobalCH4emissions(Tg/yr)
Year
Other(Wetlands,Ruminants,Rice,Landfills,Termites)
Geologicseeps
Includes
fossil
fuel
industries
2
12
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1985
1989
1993
1997
2001
2005
2009
2013
GlobalaverageFER
(%)
Year
Natural gas fugitive emissions rate (% of production) decreasing
• Median natural gas fugitive emissions rate 2.5% (based on δ13CH4)
during most recent 5 years (geological seepage accounted for)
• Bottom-up coal and oil CH4 emissions, and natural gas composition
from Schwietzke et al. 2014
2
13
Conclusions
• Global fossil fuel CH4 emissions – comparison with previous studies
- Higher than CH4 inversion studies (~150 Tg/yr prelim.)
- Largely due to lighter fossil fuel δ13CH4 source signature and
updates in atmospheric transport (TM5)
- Consistent with ice core data, which confirms bottom-up estimates
of global geological seep (≥15 Tg/yr)
• Natural gas fugitive emissions rate declining since the mid-1980s,
with current best estimate of 2.5%