IT’S ALL ABOUT THE BIG PEOPLE

Presented by: Sylvia Mijuskovic

Welcome Review of District philosophy of SIP What’s New? Review of SIP Template Parent Involvement Goal Race to the Top Teacher Appraisal System SINI vs DA DA Requirements

OBJECTIVE:

What will “we”, the instructional team, do to impact student achievement?

What will instruction look like based on the data needs of our school?

What academic areas does your objective address?

YOU MUST ADDRESS

READING MATH WRITING SCIENCE PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT

STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT

How does this work support the vision and mission of the organization?

1. Three Teacher Leaders will be identified and provided support to facilitate PLCs for three of Marzano’s Nine Strategies of Effective Instructions training.

2. Three Teacher Leaders will develop the framework for school-wide PLCs for facilitating 3 High Yield instructional strategies to faculty.

3. Create PLCs that center around 3 of the 9 High Yield Instructional strategies.

4. Teachers will observe another teacher on the effective use of one of the 3 high yield strategies.

5. During pre-observation conference, discussion will include teacher’s goals for implementation of at least one high-yield strategy within their classroom instruction.

SAMPLE SIP

Data analysis that supports the need for improvement.WHAT IS THE STORY BEHIND THE DATA?

Is there research that can guide our practice?How does our practice differ from research?

RATIONALE

RATIONALEData analysis that supports the need for improvement.WHAT IS THE STORY BEHIND THE DATA?

STRATEGIESMUST address how the

objective will be implemented.

EVALUATIONOutcome IndicatorsProgress

MonitoringPROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Utilize data from your parent involvement survey to complete this goal.

Specific template created for this goal.

Part 2 - District Option: Team and School Accountability Measures2a. 5 points – Accountability for achievement of School Improvement Plan

goals.

i. Part 1: Accountability for whole school implementation of strategies that support school-based SIP objective(s) as measured by a school portfolio containing evidence of in-process measures (reviewed by area offices).

2 points – Portfolio shows strong evidence of implementation of 100% of strategies

1 point – Portfolio shows some evidence of implementation of most strategies 0 points – Portfolio shows little or no evidence of implementation of strategies

ii. Part 2: Accountability for whole school or team (as determined by school leadership) success in meeting targets of SIP Outcome Indicators

3 points – All Outcome Indicators met or significant growth 2 points – Most Outcome Indicators met 1 points – Some Outcome Indicators met 0 points – Few or no Outcome Indicators met

DA Checklist Baseline and Mid Year Data

Report Narrative Report End of Year Checklist

FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 30, 2011• School Improvement Plan

•Hard copy to Office of Testing and Accountability (including original signatures of entire SAC)

•Hard copy to Area Office(including a copy of signatures of entire SAC)

• School Advisory Council Rosters• Hard copy to Office of Testing and Accountability (including original signatures of SAC Chair and Principal)

• DA Checklist• Hard copy to Office of Testing and Accountability

2011-2012 School Improvement Reporting Deadlines

School Improvement Plan (SIP)

Final SIP for all schoolsSeptember 30, 2011

Progress Reports

School Baseline DataOctober 10, 2011

School Mid-Year DataJanuary 20, 2012

School Mid-Year Narrative Report

February 3, 2012