Sc2220 Lecture 13 2009
Transcript of Sc2220 Lecture 13 2009
Lecture 13: ReviewSummary, Key Slides
Eric C. Thompson
Overview of the Course• Weeks 1-2: Introduction to Gender Studies• Weeks 3-4: Biology, Sex, and Gender• Weeks 5-6: Cultural Constructions of Gender• Weeks 7-9: Social Dynamics of Gender• Weeks 10-12: Gender, Social Relations and Social
Structure• Week 13: Review
Yeah… I remember
some of that.
I. INTRODUCTION TO COURSE AND GENDER STUDIES
Sex / Gender / Sexuality• Sex refers to the bodies we have as a result of biological
processes (e.g. genetics); Genitalia, Hormones, Baldness, Facial Hair, Breasts, etc.
• Gender refers to social-cultural elaborations of sex; social practices and cultural roles associated with sex characteristics.
• Sexuality refers to social-cultural elaborations (especially identities) related to sexual behavior; activities (ways of ‘having sex’), desires, relational identities (gay, straight, boyfriend, girlfriend, wife, husband, etc.)
Sociology of Women
Feminist Sociology
Sociology of Gender
Franklin pp. xiv & xxvii
“Additive”… sought to make women ‘visible’ in sociology; Research about women’s experience.
Reconceptualization of society; Focus on patriarchy and gendering of all aspects of social life; Explicitly political
Deconstruction of the category “women”; Focus on gender rather than women; Including men, masculinities, intersexed, and sexualities.
Up to 1970s
1970s-1990s
1990s-present
From “Women” to “Gender”
Waves of Feminism*• First Wave: 19th – early 20th C.– Women’s Suffrage (voting rights)
• Second Wave: 1960s – 1980s– Equality in all things: Education,
Work, Pay, Dishwashing, etc.
• Third Wave: 1990s – present– Diverse Responses to “Second
Wave” Feminism (including but not limited to “Girl Power”)
*All based mainly on American history;Similar “waves” have been constructed for Singapore.
II. BIOLOGY, SEX, AND GENDER
Human Heterosexuality shapes Gender
• If we were asexual we would have no basis for “gender” at all.
• If we were clownfish, gender would be an aspirational concept (men would aspire to one day become female).
• Because humans are “fixed” (unchanging) as male or female from birth, we think of gender as a fixed attribute determined by our biology (even though it is not).
But Biology Does Not Determine Gender.
• Different cultures create many different interpretations of our biology (for example, two, three or more genders).
• Different societies deal with biology differently (they put male and female bodies to use in different ways).
• Gender is our cultural interpretations of and social practices associated with our biological system of sexual reproduction.
“Gender” involves Three Systems: Biological, Social and Cultural
• Biological system: a product and process of biochemical interactions.
• Social system: a product and process of relationships and exchanges among individuals (and groups of people).
• Cultural system: a product and process of relationships among ideas and beliefs expressed though language, images, etc.
• Commonly in Gender Studies the first is classified as “sex” and the second two as “gender”.
CULTURALSYSTEMS
SOCIALSYSTEMS
BIOLOGICALSYSTEMS
DIAGRAM 1:Human Systems,General Integration
Each system has some relationship to the other systems.
BIOLOGICAL
SYSTEMS
Socio-Cultural
SYSTEMS
DIAGRAM 6:Gender Systems
Example 3: Gender Systems.Interaction between socio-cultural systems and biological systems with respect to gender and sex is substantial.(But this does not mean biology “explains” gender systems.)
III. CULTURAL CONSTRUCTIONS OF GENDER
Gender Socialization:How We Learn Gender (3 Models)
Model 1:Direct Teaching/
Rewards & Punishment
Model 2:Indirect Teaching/
Identification & Modeling Behavior
Adults set the agenda, provide rewards or punishment
Children identify with adults/parents of same sex and imitate their behavior
Gender SocializationModel 3 (Maccoby):
Peer-to-Peer Socialization
Children learn gender roles & behavior from
each other
Socialization InvolvesComplex, Multiple Influences
3. PEER SOCIALIZATION
1. DIRECT TEACHING
2. MODELING BEHAVIOR
TV4. GENERALCULTURALINFLUENCES
“Unpacking” the Gender System(Ridgeway and Correll 2004)
• Gender is a System of:• Gender Beliefs• Institutionalized Social
Practices
• “Unpacking” the Gender System means Critically* examining these Beliefs and Practices
*”Critical” Social and Cultural theory does not mean “criticizing” or bashing; it means carefully and reflectively examining.
A Few Things We “Unpacked”
• Hegemonic Masculinity; Masculinity “in Crisis”• Women in Advertising and Popular Culture• Transitions through Time; Differences from
Place to Place (Gender changes over time in every society and is different everywhere.)
• Images of Beauty – how they vary across time and in different places; implications for “objectification” (esp. of women)
IV. SOCIAL DYNAMICS OF GENDER
Patri- and Matri-(Some Terminology)
Patri-(male)
Matri-(female)
-archy(rule, govern)
-lineal(in the line of)
-local(residence,location)
Patriarchy: society in which power is disproportionately held by men
Examples:
Matrilineal: society in which property, names, status, etc. is inherited through women
Patrilocal: society in which married couples live with the man’s side of the family
*These are all different things; a society can be matrilineal but patriarchal
Patrilineal, Patrilocal Rules produce Patriarchal Relationships
• Women are dependent on men. Their social status (and livelihood) depends on marrying a husband and producing sons.
• Girls are of little value to their families; they are “married off” and join husband’s family.
• Structurally and functionally, the system provides an incentive for women to support it (becoming a mother-in-law); even though it is systemically oppressive to women.
Matrilineal, Matrilocal Rules produce Egalitarian Relationships
• Women are not dependent on husbands or sons – they own property in their own right. Girls are of value to their parents.
• Men are not dependent on women; they must “make their fortune” to be eligible husbands – but that wealth is “theirs”.
• Mother’s-brothers (uncles) are more important figures of authority than fathers.
Range of Matriarchy/PatriarchyAll things being equal, we would expect a range of societies – from
Highly Matriarchal to Highly Patriarchal.
In fact, we find a range of societies from more-or-less Egalitarian to Highly Patriarchal.
Societies That Do Not Exist Societies That Do ExistEgal
itaria
nEg
alita
rian
Very
Mat
riarc
hal
Very
Mat
riarc
hal
Very
Pat
riarc
hal
Very
Pat
riarc
hal
WHY?
Conditions of Patriarchy(Summarized)
• #1 Childcare & Investment in Offspring:– Human, mammalian offspring create a “baby burden”
for women.• #2 Sexual Exchange (Baumeister, et al.)– Intrinsically valuable female sexuality is exchanged
with men for extrinsic resources.• #3 Socioeconomic Conditions (Huber)– The consequences of sexual exchange vary under
different socioeconomic conditions• The patriarchal tendency results from the
combination of these conditions.
Additional Hypotheses
• Superior Talents of Men (Strength, Intelligence)
• Jealousy and Mate Guarding• Patriarchy is a result of Capitalism• Coercion and Use-of-Force• Testosterone Competition• Culture and Ideology (Patriarchy as a
Conceptual Trap).
Human Relationships Forged On…
• Affective (“Emotional”) Bonds– Bio-chemical; conditioned by positive neuro-chemical
feedback (“feelings of love”)• Exchange Relationships– You have something I want. I have something you
want. Let’s make a deal… (“sexual-exchange”)• Cultural Imperatives– Learned rules and categories provide us with models
of how to act vis-à-vis others. (“rules of marriage, dating, etc.”)
“Socio-sexual System”• Human Infant Care – Need for investment of a lot
of resources to raise children
• Sexual Exchange – Social bonding of males (fathers) to females (mothers), which channels resources from males to children (unusual among mammals).
• This is biologically driven (e.g. by hormones) and culturally shaped (e.g. by rules of marriage). But it is primarily social (relationships of exchange).
Sex Object, Success ObjectSame? Different?
• Sexual Exchange implies that Women are “Sex Objects” and Men are “Success Objects”
• Similarities:– The person becomes a “means to an
end” (sexual gratification, emotional gratification, wealth/resource accumulation)
• Differences:– Embodied objectification (sex object)
vs. “Disembodied” (externalized?) objectification
– Being “success objects” leads men in general into activities that may be empowering (for some of them); Being a “sex object” does not.
V. GENDER, SOCIAL RELATIONS AND STRUCTURES
Issues in Gender at Work
• The Double Shift– Women working a “double shift”– Domestic marginalization of Men
• The Gender Gap in Wages– Choice Theory (women choose to ‘opt out’)– Gendered Organization Theory– Overt Discrimination
“Flight from Marriage,” Foreign Brides and Transnational Patriarchy
• Singaporean women, in large numbers, ‘opt out’ of marriage or leverage their education and employment resources for a “better deal” (professional working women; more than ‘traditional wives’).
• Singaporean men, in large numbers, look to foreign brides as a means of maintaining “patriarchal privileges” (i.e. having a ‘traditional wife’).
Some Final Points…(that we didn’t have time for last week)
Commodification of “Women’s Work”:The Logic of “Neoliberalism” (Markets)• Women’s work is commodified and subject to
substantial rationalization and specialization.• Traditionally, one woman (wife) provides sex, babies
and domestic work for men (husband).• With commodification and specialization:– Wives (mothers) provide babies.– Maids provide domestic work.– Sex workers (prostitution; pornography) provide sexual
services.– Of course, not always in all cases! But, this follows from
the “logic” of commodification and specialization.• This frees women to pursue their own careers; but also
makes marital relationships more tenuous.
“Classic” (Kandiyoti 1988) and Transnational Forms of Patriarchy
• Classic: Patriarchal privilege maintained by –– Patrilineal inheritance: Men (sons) inherit property; women
do not.– Patrilocal residence: Women (wives) leave their natal
families, live with their husband’s family (cut off from natal family and social network support).
• Transnational: Patriarchy maintained by –– Territorial state sovereignty: nation states control borders;
create zones of relative wealth and relative deprivation (“First” and “Third” Worlds)
– “Flexible citizenship” – Men from the First World can leverage citizenship (PR and other status) as a resource to negotiate a “patriarchal bargain” with Third World women.**First world women can and occasionally do leverage citizenship as well in relationships with Third world men (see cases in the Carribean; Allen 2007); but generally, women do not. Why? Refer to “sexual exchange theory”.
Is Singapore a “Patriachal Society”?• Yes… and No• Generalized “male-biased” policies; but more powerful
“human resource” policies that provide a lot of support for women (provided that they are Singaporean citizens… and especially if ‘highly educated’).
• Confucian ideology of patrilocal, patrilineal ‘classic’ patriarchy; BUT… no longer (never was!) an agricultural society. (Disconnect between culture and economy.)
• Substantial emergence of “transnational patriarchy” (foreign brides, not to mention maids!)
• Female citizens are ‘freed’ (to a substantial degree; not fully) from patriarchy; imported “third world” women take their place to maintain “patriarchal privileges”.