SARD Report2_Final_4.17.09_web
-
Upload
jean-yves-mesnil -
Category
Documents
-
view
233 -
download
0
description
Transcript of SARD Report2_Final_4.17.09_web
Code and RegulatoRy BaRRieRs to the living Building Challenge foR sustainaBle, affoRdaBle, Residential development
RepoRt #2: stRategies & ReCommendations
PREPAREDFOR: PREPAREDBY:
CITYOFVANCOUVER,WA CASCADIAREGION CLARKCOUNTY,WA GREENBUILDINGCOUNCIL
ProducedthroughfundingfromtheWashingtonDepartmentofCommunity,Trade,andEconomicDevelopment.
Ops
isA
rchi
tect
ure
Ops
isA
rchi
tect
ure
Eart
hen
Hom
e,p
hoto
cou
rtes
yof
Eco
-Sen
se,w
ww
.eco
-sen
se.c
a
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: �CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
taBle of Contents
exeCutive summaRy .....................................................................................................3
intRoduCtion ................................................................................................................5
pRoCess & findings ......................................................................................................7
ReCommendations .......................................................................................................9
next steps...................................................................................................................21
appendix a: full list of suggested stRategies foR Removing Code & RegulatoRy BaRRieRs ...............................................................................................22
appendix B: exteRnal stakeholdeR gRoup pRioRities ......................................37
appendix C: ReCommendations foR Regional CollaBoRation effoRt in ClaRk County ..............................................................................................................43
appendix d: pRojeCt paRtiCipants & stakeholdeRs ...........................................44
2 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: �CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
exeCutive summaRy
Thisreportprovidesstrategiesandrecommendationsforremovingbarrierstosustainable,affordable,residentialdevelopment(SARD)inClarkCountyandtheCityofVancouver.Building,development,andlandusecodeswereevaluatedtoidentifybarriers,andinputwassolicitedfromboththeprivatesectorbuildingcommunityaswellasinternalstafftoarriveatpossiblesolutionsforremovingobstacles.ThefollowingisasummarizedlistofprioritizedrecommendationsfortheCityandCountytoconsiderinremovingbarriers.Theyarecategorizedbybarriertypeandlistedaseitherastrategythatcanbeeasilyimplementedintheshorttermoronethatwillrequiredadditionalresearchandresourcesandthereforerepresentsalongertermstrategy.Theseprioritizedrecommendationsareexplainedinfurtherdetailwithinthebodyofthisreport,along with references to specific examples where other jurisdictions have implemented similar approachestoremovingbarriers.Additionally,afulllistofsuggestedstrategiesforalllanduse,development and building code barriers identified through this project is found in Appendix A.
Barrier short-term Recommendations long-term Recommendations
i. institutional/pRoCess BaRRieRs
�. EstablishanExpeditedorPriorityPermitProcessingProgram for Green Building Projects that Commit to AchievingaHighLevelofGreenPerformance(e.g.LEED®-Gold Certification).
2. DevelopIn-HouseMandatoryTrainingsTargetedtoPlanners, Plans Examiners, Building Officials, and Inspectors.
Combinedtrainingswithmonthlyorquarterlymeetings between building officials, plans examiners,andinspectorstolearnaboutnewtechnologiesandcoordinatecommunicationongreen building projects.Bringinexpertsfromtheprivatesectorandutilizein-houseexpertstoteachtrainings,andinclude field trips to see sustainable development strategiesin-place.
•
•
�. EstablishMandatoryGreen“Pre-Application”Meetingsto Involve Building Officials and Reviewers Early on in theDesignProcess.
Provideearlydesignmeetingswithbuildingofficials and reviewers free-of-charge to applicantsasanincentivetoencouragemoresustainable development projects. Assign the green project an ombudsman or “greenchampion”withinthedepartmentwhoisresponsibleforensuringafacilitatedreviewprocess,helpingtoaddressanycodeobstaclesthat do arise, and communicating with project teamsonpossiblesolutions.
4. CreateaGreenBuildingTechnicalAssistanceProgram.ProvideeducationandoutreachinternallytoCityandCountystaffaswellastotheprivatedevelopmentcommunity.Develop a cross-jurisdictional technical assistanceprogrambetweenVancouverandClarkCountyandpossiblyincludingothercities/townswithintheCountytohelpimproveconsistencyandstretchlimitedresources.Leverageexistingconservationprogramsfundedthroughlocalutilities(suchassolidwaste,drinkingwater,stormwater,wastewater,orenergy).
•
•
•
•
•
ii. BaRRieRs to eneRgy effiCienCy
1. Define Requirements and Develop Guidelines for PermittingRenewableEnergyandPassiveHeating/CoolingSystems.
Define standards for urban and rural small scale windenergysystems,photovoltaicandsolarthermalinstallations,passivesolardesign,andnaturalventilation.
2. Consider Density Bonuses for Energy Efficiency Measures.
Increase floor area ratios (FAR) for high performance projects. Increasedensityforcottagehousingdevelopments.
•
•
•
�. AmendSEPAtoIncludeEvaluationandMitigationofGreenhouseGasEmissionsfromNewConstructionProjects Including Embodied Energy of Materials, ConstructionActivities,andOngoingOperatingEnergy.
4. RequireandEnforcePerformanceTestingtoDemonstrateResidentialEnergyCodeCompliance.
Developaprocessforrequiringblowerdoortesting on new construction residential projects.Develop a job training program around blower doortestingtohelpsupportlocaleconomicdevelopment.
5. Develop a District Energy Demonstration Project Ordinance.
Addresslanduseplanningissuesassociatedwithcrossingpropertyboundaries,utilityconnectionrequirements,andongoingmaintenanceandmanagementfordistrictsystems.Allow for greater flexibility within the current codes for pilot projects and require reporting to informfuturecodeamendments.
•
•
•
•
4 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
Barrier short-term Recommendations long-term Recommendations
iii. BaRRieRs foR non-Conventional gReen Building stRuCtuRes
�. AllowFlexibilitywithinthebuildingcodesfor“Incubator”Pilot Projects to Test Alternative Green Materials.
2. DevelopCodeGuidanceforStrawbaleStructures.Utilizecodeguidancelanguagefromotherjurisdictions.
•
�. DevelopanAdvisoryCommitteeofGreenBuildingExpertsforAlternativeTechnologies.
Assembleagroupofthird-partyexpertschargedwithreviewingdatasuppliedbytheapplicantandmaking recommendations to building officials.ParticipateontheCityofPortland’sAlternativeTechnologiesCommittee,ordevelopasimilarcommittee specific to City and County projects.
•
•
iv. dRiveway & fiRe aCCess Road widths
�. DevelopCodeGuidanceonAcceptableandBestPracticesforLowImpactDevelopment.
Provideeducationandguidancetodevelopersoncode-acceptableLIDpractices.
•
2. UpdateStandardsforStreets,FireAccessRoadsandPrivateDriveways.
RequireLIDapproachesthatreduceimpervioussurfacesthroughthedesignofnarrowerroadsandtheuseofperviouspavements.
�. ConsiderStormwaterManagementUtilityFeeReductions.
OfferfeereductionsforLIDapproachesthatmanagestormwateronsite.TierfeereductionstopromotemoreaggressiveLIDapproachesthatincludecomprehensivenaturaldrainagestrategies.
•
•
•
v. minimum paRking RequiRements
�. ConsiderNewPoliciestoReduceMinimumParkingRequirementsasPartofanOverallStrategytoIncreaseAlternativeTransportationintheNextCity/CountyComprehensivePlanUpdate.
Allowforareductioninrequiredonsiteparkinginexchangefordedicatedcar-sharevehiclespaces.Reducedoreliminatedparkingrequirementsfordevelopmentslocatedinmixed-usedistricts.Define requirements for bicycle storage facilities.Developpedestrian-orientedstreetstandards.Requirepedestrianconnectionsbetweenhousingdevelopmentsandnearbycommunityservices.Allowing greater flexibility for affordable housing projects to reduce onsite parking provided based onneed.
•
•
•••
•
vi. setBaCks & sepaRation foR RainwateR haRvesting CisteRns
�. ProvideGuidanceonDesigning,Permitting,Installing,andMaintainingRainwaterHarvestingCisternsintoNewConstruction and Retrofit Applications.
2. ReviseCodeRequirementsforSetbacksandBuildingSeparationforAbove-GroundRainwaterCisterns.
Eliminatesetbackandseparationrequirementsforabovegroundcisterns.
•
vii. ClusteR developments/Cottage housing
�. DevelopNewCityandCountyCottageHousingCodes.
viii. wateR-Related BaRRieRs
�. ProvideGuidanceonDesigning,Permitting,Installing,andMaintainingRainwaterHarvestingCisterns.
Seerecommendationabove.•
2. CollaborateinaNeighborhood-ScaleNetZeroWaterPilot Project.
Developademonstrationordinancethatallowsfor flexibility within the current codes for a neighborhood-scaledevelopmentwithnetzerowatergoalsRequiremonitoringandreportingofwateruseandwastewaterreduction,andutilizedatatosupportfuturecodeupdates.
•
•
The next step in the SARD project will be to evaluate the cost and benefits of the recommended list above to both the City and County as well as the private development community. A final report will bepublishedinJune2009
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: �CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
intRoduCtion
BaCkgRound
TheCityofVancouver,Washington,inpartnershipwithClarkCounty,hascontractedwiththeCascadiaRegionGreenBuildingCouncil(Cascadia)toevaluateCityandCountycodesandregulationsthatposebarrierstosustainable,affordable,residentialdevelopment(SARD).Cascadia’sLivingBuildingChallengehasbeenusedasthebenchmarkperformancestandardforthecodestudybecauseitcurrentlyrepresentsthemoststringentstandardestablishedforgreenbuilding projects across the country.
The following codes were analyzed as part of this project:
Code
Zoning VMCTitle20,CCCTitle40
LandDivisions VMC20.�20,CCC40.�40
PlannedUnitDevelopment VMC20.260,CCC40.�20
SitePlan VMC20.270,CCC40.�20
Grading VMC�7.�2,CCC�4.07
ErosionControl VMC�4.24,CCC40.�80
StormwaterManagement VMC�4.2�,CCC40.�80
ParkingStandards VMC20.94�,CCC40.�40
StreetStandards VMCTitle��,CCC40.��0
InternationalBuildingCode–2006Edition StandardsandAmendmentsWAC��-�0
InternationalMechanicalCode–2006Edition StandardsandAmendmentsWAC��-�2
InternationalFireCode–2006Edition StandardsandAmendmentsWAC��-�4
UniformPlumbingCode–2006Edition StandardsandAmendments,WAC��-�6,��-�7
WashingtonStateEnergyCode–2006Edition WAC��-��
WashingtonStateVentilationandIndoorAirQualityCode–2006Edition
WAC��-��
OnsiteSewageSystems CCC24.�7
GroupAPublicDrinkingWaterSystems WAC246-290
GroupBPublicDrinkingWaterSystems WAC246-29�
LargeOn-SiteSewageSystems WAC246-272B
WastewaterTreatmentFacilities WAC�7�-240
EvidenceofAdequateDrinkingWaterSupply RCW�9.27.097
6 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
InNovember2008,CascadiapublishedReport #1: Findingsidentifyingmorethan80obstaclesthatcurrently exist within Vancouver and Clark County codes and regulations which project teams may encounter when seeking approval for a Living Building project. Roughly 30 of these code barriers werefoundinthelanduseanddevelopmentcodesandanother�0withinthebuilding,plumbingandenergycodes.SomeofthebarriersweredirectlyrelatedtoCityandCountyregulationswhileothers extended beyond the authority of the local jurisdictions to the state level. A full list of building, development, and land use code barriers identified in Report #1: Findingscanbefoundonlineat:www.cityofvancouver.us/envplan.
goals
ThepurposeofReport #2: Strategies & Recommendationsisto:
summarizetheprocessfordevelopingacomprehensivelistofstrategiestoaddressthebarriers identified in Report #1,
presentthelistofstrategiesinanorganizedandeasy-to-referenceformat,and
providebothshort-termandlong-termrecommendationsonaprioritizedlistofkeybarriersinordertoassisttheCityandCountywithaddressingandremovingbarrierstosustainableaffordableresidentialdevelopment.
The SARD project is funded through the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and EconomicDevelopment.
•
•
•
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: 7CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
pRoCess & findings
TheprocessofdevelopingstrategiesandrecommendationsforaddressingcodeandregulatoryobstaclestotheLivingBuildingChallengeinvolvedaseriesoffacilitatedmeetingswithbothinternalandexternalstakeholdergroupsbetweenJanuary2009andMarch2009.Thepurposeofthemeetingswastosolicitfeedbackfromkeyparticipantsandtobrainstormsolutionsthatwerebothcreativeandfeasibleforimplementation.
exteRnal stakeholdeR meetings
TheCityandCountyinvitedover��0localstakeholdersfromtheprivatesector(includingdevelopers,architects,engineers,homebuilders,affordablehousingdevelopersandgreenbuildingadvocates)toparticipateinaseriesofthreeworkshops.
workshop #1: Cascadia presented key findings from the code analysis process and requested feedbackonadditionalcodeandregulatoryobstaclesfromtheperspectiveofthedevelopmentcommunity.
workshop #2: Working with a summarized list of key findings, participants were divided into small groupstodiscussthebarriersandbrainstormonpossiblesolutionsforhowtheCityandCountycouldaddressthem.Atotalof90possiblestrategieswererecorded(seeAppendix B).
workshop #3:Cascadiaorganizedthelistofpossiblestrategiesintothreecategories:Education,Incentives,andCodeLanguage/RegulatoryProcessChange.ParticipantswerethenaskedtoselectthetopfourtypesofbarriersthattheywouldliketoseetheCityandCountyprioritizeaspartoftheSARD project, and to select the most important strategies within those categories for addressing thebarriers.
Table�showstheresultsfromtheprioritizationexercise,demonstratingacleardirectionfromtheprivatestakeholdersthattheneedforaddressinginstitutionalandprocessbarrierswithinthe regulatory system is the highest priority. Barriers to energy efficiency goals, approvals for non-conventionalstructuressuchasstrawbaleconstruction,andimpervioussurfacecoveragefordriveway and fire access roads were the next highest priorities, respectively.
table 1: external stakeholder priorities
Institutional/ProcessBarriers
BarrierstoEnergyEfficiency
Non-ConventionalStructures
Driveway&FireAccessRoadWidths
MinimumParkingRequirements
SetbacksforRainwaterCisterns
ClusterDevelopment
Toxic(redlist)Materials
ConnectiontoPublicWater
ConnectiontoPublicSewer
OnsiteFuelStorage
0 � �0 �� 20 2�#responses
8 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
In addition to the three private stakeholder meetings, Cascadia also presented the SARD project attheVancouverPlanningCommission’sFirstTuesdayeventinMarch2009andattendedapublicopen house, also in March 2009, to further communicate the project’s goals and findings.
inteRnal stakeholdeR meetings
A meeting with the City and County building officials was held to review the building code barriers matrixandbrainstormonstrategiesforremovingobstacleswithintheInternationalBuilding,MechanicalandFireCodesandwithintheWashingtonStateEnergyCodes.
Due to the inter-agency nature of the barriers arising around projects seeking net zero water goals, a separate meeting was held specifically to discuss the draft water barriers diagram. This diagram,includedinReport #1,illustratesthemyriadapprovals,variances,andwaiversrequiredfor a project seeking to source its water supply solely from harvested rainwater and reclaimed greywater,andtotreatitswastewateronsitethroughcompostingtoilets,membranebioreactorsand/orlivingmachinetechnologies.ThemeetingwasattendedbyrepresentativesfromtheCityandCountybuildingdepartments,ClarkCountyPublicHealth,ClarkPublicUtilities,ClarkRegional Wastewater District, the Plumbers & Steamfitters Union UA290, and the Washington State DepartmentsofHealthandEcology,andwasfacilitatedbyCascadiaandSERAArchitects.
Acompletelistofsuggestedstrategiesandresourcesforeachbarrier,organizedbycodetype,isfoundinAppendix A.
Lastly,theexternalstakeholders’prioritizedlistofstrategieswaspresentedtotheSARDSteeringCommittee(comprisedofCityandCountydepartmentheads,managers,andkeystaff)whoprovidedfeedbackonthefeasibilityandapplicabilityofthestakeholders’input,andmadeadditionalsuggestionsthatweretakenintoconsideration.Theoutcomeofthisprocessisalistofprioritizedrecommendationspresentedinthenextsection.
AlistofexternalandinternalstakeholderswhoparticipatedinthisprocesscanbefoundinAppendix D.
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: 9CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
ReCommendations
ThefollowingisalistofpriorityrecommendationsfortheCityandCountyinremovingbarrierstosustainable,affordable,residentialdevelopment.Therecommendationsweredevelopedbyanalyzing the priorities identified by the external stakeholder group, suggestions and feedback from CityandCountystaff,andextensiveresearchonstrategiesforincreasedlocalgovernmentsupportofsustainabledevelopment.Inparticular,theRockyMountainLandUseInstitute’sDraft Sustainable Community Development CodeandtheCode Barriers to the Living Building Challenge ReportbytheDevelopmentCenterforAppropriateTechnologyandSustainableAlternativesConsulting,Inc.weretwo resources used in developing recommendations for the SARD project. Both short term and long termrecommendationsareprovidedinanattempttofurtherprioritizetheremovalofbarriersbyidentifyingthosethatcanbeeasilyandquicklyadoptedversusthosethatwillrequireadditionalanalysis,research,orprocessespriortoimplementation.Afulllistofsuggestedstrategiesforallland use, development and building code barriers identified in Report #1isfoundinAppendix A.
i. institutional/pRoCess BaRRieRs
Background
Throughouttheexternalstakeholderworkshops,aresoundingthemefromparticipantswasthedesireforamorecollaborative,consistent,andopenprocessforseekingregulatoryapprovalfor sustainable, affordable, residential development projects. Green projects typically have to justify design approaches over again for each project because there is a lack of consistency or communicationamongreviewersandinspectorsonapprovedalternatives,requiringasometimeslengthyandexpensivepermittingprocessforapplicants.
Ashiftamongstbuildingandplanningdepartmentsfrombusiness-as-usualapproachestofullyembracingandsupportingmoreintegrated,sustainabledevelopmentpracticesisalreadyunderwayaroundthecountry.TheCityofVancouverandClarkCountyarenotaloneintheireffortstoaddressinstitutionalbarrierswithintheiragencies,andthereismuchtolearnfromotherlocalmunicipalitieswhohavefoundinnovativewaystoleveragelimitedresourcesfordevelopingpolicies,programs,andincentivesthatpromotesustainabledevelopment.Atthesametime,theresponsibilityofregulatoryagenciestoensurethatbuildingsaredesignedandconstructedtosafeguardpublicwelfaremustnotbeundermined.Instead,ashiftinfocusisneededfromupholdingminimumstandardstowardsamorecomprehensiveapproachforremovingobstaclesand encouraging projects that have lower impact, higher energy and water efficiency, and healthier indoorenvironmentsforbuildingoccupants.
short term Recommendations
1. Establish an Expedited or Priority Permit Processing Program for Green Projects.
Because green building projects, especially those that are proposing new technologies or alternativematerialsormethodsfromthoseprescribedincodes,canrequirelongertimeforreview and approvals, guaranteeing a shorter review schedule or placing these projects at the frontofthereviewlineisonewaytohelpfacilitateasmootherprocessforapplicants.Whiletheexternalstakeholdergrouprecommendedthedevelopmentofaprocessforqualifyingan“A-list”ofdesigners,builders,etc.tohelpstreamlineapprovals,thisapproachisnotrecommendedforavarietyofreasonsprimarily because building officials are responsible for ensuring that each project meets public health and safety standards. Instead, providing expedited or priority review for projects (rather than individuals) demonstrating a commitment
�0 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
to reaching a high level of green building design (e.g. LEED-Gold certification) would ensure theintegrityofsuchaprogram.Additionally,manybuildingdepartmentshaveinstitutedapriority or expedited permitting program for green projects that is integrated within their existing review process and therefore does not require extensive staffing or resources to manage.
examples
Issaquah,WA:www.ci.issaquah.wa.us
ChandlerCity,AZ:www.chandleraz.gov/Content/20080626_��.pdf
NorthbrookVillage/Town,IL:www.northbrook.il.us/Government/BoardsCommissions/Passouts/2008/0���08RBM/documents/NB_GreenBuildingInitiativeOrdinance.pdf
2. DevelopIn-HouseMandatoryTrainingsTargetedtoPlanners,PlansExaminers,BuildingOfficials, and Inspectors.
Asnewgreenbuildingtechnologiesandsystemsareintroducedintothemarket,theimportanceofongoingtrainingforplanningandbuildingdepartmentstaffisespeciallycriticaltohelpaddressinstitutionalandprocessbarriers.Theexternalstakeholdergroupindicatedthatconsistencyamongstreviewersorinspectorswhoarechargedwithapprovalsthroughoutthe life of the project is lacking. Feedback from the City and County building departments indicated that while a single plans reviewer or inspector throughout the project’s approval process is ideal, this is not always feasible based on resource or staffing issues. Trainings combined with monthly or quarterly meetings between building officials, plans examiners, and inspectorstolearnaboutnewtechnologiesandcoordinatecommunicationongreenbuildingprojects is one way to help address this obstacle. Bringing in experts from the private sector and utilizing in-house experts to teach trainings, as well as taking field trips to see sustainable developmentstrategiesin-placearealleffectivewaystohosttrainingsonalimitedbudget.
example
KingCountyDDESTrainingSeries:http://your.kingcounty.gov/solidwaste/greenbuilding/toolkit/governments/permit-training.pdf
long term Recommendations
3. Establish Mandatory Green “Pre-Application” Meetings to Involve Building Officials and ReviewersEarlyonintheDesignProcess.
A key component to a successful green project, and particularly important for projects seeking tomeettheLivingBuildingChallenge,istheutilizationoftheintegrateddesignprocessamongst project teams. As described in Report #1,thetraditionallylinearnatureoftheapprovals process can create barriers for integrated design projects, which inherently rely onaniterativeinformationcycle.Onehighpriorityfortheexternalstakeholdergroupwastoreplacethe“turnin,getfeedback,turninagain,getfeedback”reviewapproachwithmorecollaborative face-to-face opportunities. This allows project teams to meet with those who willberesponsibleforreviewingandapprovingtheirplansandhaveconstructivedialoguesaround opportunities and challenges while the project is still in the early stages of design. Early design meetings with building officials and reviewers may be free-of-charge to applicants as an incentive to encourage more sustainable development projects, or they may be an added cost to the project team. If the latter is implemented, education and communication around involving building and public health officials early on to help create a smoother and quicker overallreviewprocesswillbeimportantsothattheperceptionofincreasedfeesdoesnotdiscourage green projects. Assigning the green project an ombudsman or “green champion”
•
•
•
•
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: ��CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
withinthedepartmentwhoisresponsibleforensuringafacilitatedreviewprocess,helpingtoaddress any code obstacles that do arise, and communicating with project teams on possible solutionscanfurtherassisttheCityandCountywithestablishingamoreintegratedapproachforpermitting.
4. CreateaGreenBuildingTechnicalAssistanceProgram.
A green building technical assistance program would serve two purposes: first to support educationandoutreachinternallyaswellasincreasethecollaborationbetweendifferentdepartments;andsecondtoprovidetheprivatedevelopmentcommunitywithanestablishedstarting point for tackling code obstacles for green projects. The external stakeholder group expressed a desire to shift the mindset of the jurisdictions to be more positive and open to newideas.Knowingthattheyhaveapointofcontactforbringingforwardnewandinnovativesustainabledevelopmentdesignstrategiesisonewaytoaddressthisshiftinmindset.
To leverage resources, a cross-jurisdictional technical assistance program between Vancouver andClarkCountyandpossiblyincludingothercities/townswithintheCountycouldbeestablished. Many jurisdictions have found resources to establish green building technical assistanceprogramsthatdovetailwithalreadyestablishedconservationprogramsfundedbylocalutilities,forexample,throughsolidwaste,drinkingwater,stormwater,wastewater,orenergyutilityconservationfees.
examples
CityofPortland,OR:www.portlandonline.com/osd/index.cfm?c=4�48�
CityofKirkland,WA:www.ci.kirkland.wa.us/Community/Kirkland_Green/Green_Building.htm
SarasotaCounty,FL:www.scgov.net/sustainability
ii. BaRRieRs to eneRgy effiCienCy
Background
TheCityandCountyarerequiredtoenforcetheWashingtonStateEnergyCode(WSEC)andarenotpermittedtoamendtheresidentialrequirementsofthecode.However,fewcodeprovisionsexist within the WSEC that prevent green building projects from moving beyond minimum code requirementstowardnetzeroenergy,aprerequisiteoftheLivingBuildingChallenge.Instead,theSARD project findings point toward a lack of education, information, incentives, and enforcement that creates obstacles for design teams seeking to increase energy efficiency and use viable renewable energy sources for their projects.
BoththeCityandCountyhavesustainabilitypoliciesthatextendbeyondbuildinganddevelopmentdepartments. New incentives, education, and programs around energy efficiency and renewable energyshouldbecoordinatedwithexistingsustainabilitypolicies.
Whiletheshorttermrecommendationsoutlinedbelowprovidesuggestionsonhowtoprovidepermitguidanceandincentives,thelongtermrecommendationstakeastepbeyondremovalofexistingobstaclesintotherealmofincreasedregulatoryoversightwiththeintentofeveningtheplaying field for projects seeking net zero energy goals.
•
•
•
�2 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
short term Recommendations
1. Define Requirements and Develop Guidelines for Permitting Renewable Energy and Passive Heating/CoolingSystems.
Theobstaclesaroundrenewableenergysystemsandpassiveheating/coolingdesignstrategiescurrently acceptable by codes stem from either the absence of defined standards, or from the real or perceived obstacles that project teams may encounter during the regulatory process. Thedevelopmentofcodeguidelinesaddressesboththeissues.
Looking to wind ordinances developed by other jurisdictions, it is recommended that Vancouver and Clark County define standards for permitting both urban and rural small scale wind energysystemsincludingsetback,heightandnoiserequirements,aswellasstructuralrequirementsforbuilding-mountedinstallations.Similarcodeguidanceforphotovoltaicandsolar thermal installations should be developed. Lastly, guidelines for project teams wanting toutilizepassiveheating/coolingdesignstrategieswillhelpcommunicatewhatisallowedby code. Guidelines should specifically address optimizing solar orientation, balanced with theimportanceofshadeandtreeretentiononsite.AreviewofClarkCounty’sformersolarordinancecouldserveasalaunchingpointfornewpolicydevelopment.
examples
AmericanWindEnergyAssociation.In the Public Interest: How and Why to Permit for Small Wind Systems: A Guide for State and Local Governments.www.awea.org/smallwind/pdf/InThePublicInterest.pdf
NationalRenewableEnergyLaboratory.An Overview of Existing Wind Energy Ordinances. www.windpoweringamerica.gov/pdfs/policy/2008/ordinances_overview.pdf
LincolnCity,OR,DraftOrdinanceNo.2009-06forSmallWindSystemsandSmallSolarEnergySystems.
CityofSeattle’sClientAssistanceMemo#420:SolarElectricSystems.www.seattle.gov/DPD/Publications/CAM/cam420.pdf
CityofFortCollins,Colorado,LandUseCode:SolarAccess,Orientation,andShading:www.colocode.com/ftcollins/landuse/article�.htm#sec�d2d�
MultnomahCounty,Oregon,SolarAccessProvisionsforNewDevelopment: www2.co.multnomah.or.us/Community_Services/LUT-Planning/urban/zonordin/solar/solar_index.html
2. Consider Density Bonuses for Energy Efficiency Measures.
WhileClarkPublicUtilitiesdoesofferrebatesforenergyconservationmeasures,additionalincentiveswithintheauthorityofCityandCountybuildingandplanningdepartmentsmayhelp offset the added costs for incorporating aggressive efficiency measures and renewables, especially for affordable housing projects. Offering density bonuses in strategic zoning areas suchasdowntownorneighborhoodbusinessdistrictsinexchangeforhighperformanceenergy efficient buildings is one suggestion. Utilizing increases in floor area ratios (FAR), instead of straight height restrictions, allows for flexibility in the building design. Where density bonusesalreadyexistforaffordablehousing,combiningbonusesassistsaffordablehousingprojects by offsetting the initial costs of design or construction for efficiency measures or renewables with additional financing or revenue from added housing units.
InlessdensesuburbanandruralareasoftheCityandCounty,developingprovisionsfor cottage housing can help encourage smaller, more energy efficient homes. See recommendations under Cluster Development/Cottage Housing.
•
•
•
•
•
•
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: ��CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
examples
ArlingtonCounty,VA:www.arlingtonva.us/departments/EnvironmentalServices/epo/EnvironmentalServicesEpoIncentiveProgram.aspx
CityofSeattle,WA:www.seattle.gov/dpd/greenbuilding
long term Recommendations
�. AmendSEPAtoIncludeEvaluationandMitigationofGreenhouseGasEmissionsfromNewConstruction Projects Including Embodied Energy of Materials, Construction Activities, and OngoingOperatingEnergy.
In2007,KingCountyadoptedrequirementsforevaluationofgreenhousegasemissionsforprojects requiring review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), followed by a similarordinanceadoptedbytheCityofSeattle.Whilenomitigationeffortsarerequiredatthis time by either jurisdiction, a climate change impacts worksheet was developed to assist project teams in assessing and reporting the quantity of greenhouse gas emissions generated overthelifespanofabuilding.Thisincludesemissionsassociatedwithobtainingconstructionmaterials,fuelusedduringconstruction,energyconsumedduringthebuilding’soperation,andtransportationimpactsofthebuilding’soccupants.VancouverandClarkCountyshouldconsiderordinancesfromothermunicipalitiestodevelopgreenhousegasemissionsreportingrequirements and work collaboratively with other jurisdictions to define mitigation options for development projects.
examples
KingCounty,WA:www.kingcounty.gov/property/permits/info/SiteSpecific/ClimateChange.aspx
CityofSeattle:www.seattle.gov/dpd/Planning/GreenhouseGas/Overview
4. RequireandEnforcePerformanceTestingtoDemonstrateResidentialEnergyCodeCompliance.
WhiletheWashingtonStateEnergyCodeprescribes0.��airchangesperhour(ACH)asthetargetvalueforhomeairleakage,currentlythereisnorequirementforlocalbuildinginspectorstoverifycompliancewiththiscodeprovision.Ablowerdoortestcanbeutilizedtoconfirm that the proposed air leakage rate is achieved during the inspection process. The City andCountyshoulddevelopaprocessforrequiringblowerdoortestingonnewconstructionresidential projects. This could be done in-house which would require building inspectors to performtesting,orthisservicecouldbecontractedouttoindependentthird-partiestoperformthetestingandcertifyresults.Whileindependentblowerdoortestingcancost$200-$�00per home, research on increased energy efficiency and reduced utility bills help justify this cost,especiallyforaffordablehousingdeveloperswithlongtermoperatingbudgetsinmind.Furthermore, developing job training around blower door testing can help support economic development opportunities through increased green collar jobs within the community.
5. Develop a District Energy Demonstration Project Ordinance.
For many Living Building projects, meeting net zero energy and net zero water goals may makemoresensebytakingadvantageofresourcesattheneighborhoodorcommunitylevelsratherthebuildingsitelevel.Districtenergysystemscentralizetheproductionofheatingorcoolingforaneighborhoodorcommunity.Currentbuildingcodesandregulationsmakedistrict-level systems challenging based on the site-specific nature of the codes. Developing a demonstration project ordinance for district energy systems can help identify potential pilot projects and provide valuable input on performances and benefits of these systems,
•
•
•
•
�4 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
helping to inform future code amendments. A district energy demonstration project ordinance shouldaddresslanduseplanningissuesassociatedwithcrossingpropertyboundaries,utilityconnectionrequirements,andongoingmaintenanceandmanagementforthesystem,allowingfor greater flexibility within the current codes for pilot projects.
examples
BCClimateActionToolkit:www.toolkit.bc.ca/tool/district-energy-systems
SunnysideNeighborhoodEnergy,Portland,ORhttp://sunnysideneighborhoodenergy.wikispaces.com/Welcome
iii. non-Conventional gReen Building stRuCtuRes
Background
Withgrowingawarenessoftheresource-intensityofconventionalbuildingsandthedesiretolowerabuilding’senvironmentalfootprint,designersandbuildersareincreasinglyinterestedintheuseoflower-energy,locally-produced,andminimally-processedmaterialsusedforbuildingstructuressuch as strawbale, rammed earth or other non-conventional materials. The SARD study specifically lookedatbarrierstostrawbalewhichisahighly-insulated,low-costwallmaterial.Testingforstructural strength and fire protection for strawbale and other nonconventional materials can make themcost-prohibitive,especiallyforanaffordablehousingdeveloper.Manyoftherecommendationsforaddressingobstaclestononconventionalmaterialsaresimilartothosedescribedaboveininstitutional/processbarrierscategory.Educationonbothsidesofthecounter,incentivessuchasexpeditedpermitting,andtechnicalassistancecanallhelpimproveconsistencyindesigning,reviewingandapprovingstrawbaleandsimilarstructures.
short term Recommendations
1. Allow Flexibility for “Incubator” Pilot Projects to Test Alternative Green Materials.
Collaborate with pilot projects to test alternative green materials, specifically those becoming moreandmorecommonlikestrawbalethatarestillrequiredtoutilizethealternativecodecompliancepaths,inordertoestablishstandardsandguidelinesforfuturecodechanges.It is important to disseminate findings from pilot projects both internally within the building departmentaswellastothedevelopmentcommunitysothattheybecomeresourcesforfuture projects. The Development Center for Appropriate Technology (www.dcat.net)hasanestablishedCodeComplianceinformationpackageforalternativematerials,systemsanddesigns that could be used as a template for standardizing the procedure for pilot project applicants.
2. DevelopCodeGuidanceforStrawbaleStructures.
Many jurisdictions have developed strawbale codes including Tucson/Pima County, AZ; Boulder,CO;Easton,PA;Austin,TX;GrandCounty,UT;andthestatesofCaliforniaandOregonwherestrawbalestructuresareincludedintheOregonStateResidentialCode.InWashingtonState, strawbale has been approved in multiple cities and counties by local jurisdictions throughalternativecodeprocess,includingoneapplicationwithinClarkCounty.TheCityandCountyshoulddevelopformalcodeguidanceforstrawbalestructuresthatcanbeusedasaresourcefordevelopers.
•
•
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: ��CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
examples
StateofOregon:www.strawbale.com/pdf/oregon_building_code.pdf
Tucson/PimaCounty,AZ:www.grisb.org/publications/pub�9.htm
long term Recommendations
�. DevelopanAdvisoryCommitteeofGreenBuildingExpertsforAlternativeTechnologies.
TheCityofPortlandhasrecentlylaunchedanewprocessfordeveloperswhowanttouseinnovative new green products or building methods that may encounter difficulty in getting approvedthroughthestandardbuildingcodereviewprocess.Thecreationofan“AlternativeTechnologyAdvisoryCommittee”consistingofoutsideexpertsallowsforthird-partyexpertstoreviewcasestudiesanddatasuppliedbytheapplicantsupportingthetechnology.Thecommittee then makes recommendations to the building officials as part of a standard building codeappeal.Theintentofthisnewprocessistoempowerthebuildingdepartmenttoapprovenewgreentechnologiesonamoreconditionalbasis,andtogiveapplicantsafasterturn-aroundonapprovals.DuetotheproximitytoPortland,VancouverandClarkCountycouldexploreopportunitiestoparticipatewiththePortlandAlternativeTechnologiesCommittee,orto develop their own similar committee specific to City and County projects. In the latter case, theCityandCountyshouldsolicitparticipationonthecommitteefromothercities/townswithinClarkCountyorwithinthelargerSWWashingtonregion.
example
CityofPortland,OR:www.portlandonline.com/bds/index.cfm?c=4866�
iv. dRiveway & fiRe aCCess Road widths
Background
Duringthecasestudyreviewprocess,itwasdeterminedthatrequiredhardscapesfordrivewaysand fire access road widths can pose barriers to Living Building projects by reducing the amount ofareaavailableonsitetomanagestormwaterrunoff.LookingforopportunitiestodecreaseimpervioussurfacesnotonlyhelpsmeetLivingBuildingChallengegoalsbutalsoalignswiththeCityandCounty’snewstormwatercodes,expectedtobeineffectSpring/Summer2009,thatsupportlowimpactdevelopment(LID)practices.However,anyrecommendationstoaddressimpervious surfaces must not undermine fire safety concerns such as access for fire apparatuses. Instead,therecommendationsbelowproposesolutionsthatmeetbothLIDgoalsaswellasmaintainingaccessforemergencyresponse.Coordinationbetweenthedevelopmentandrevisionsof road/street standards by Transportation departments and fire safety requirements is critical.
short term Recommendation
�. DevelopCodeGuidanceonAcceptableandBestPracticesforLowImpactDevelopment.
WiththeupdatestotheCityandCountystormwatercodesin2009,lowimpactdevelopmentpractices will soon be supported by codes rather than discouraged. LID pilot projects in othermunicipalitieshavedemonstratedcostsavingstodevelopersbyreducingstormwaterinfrastructuresuchaslargepipes,detention/retentionfacilities,andtheassociatedexcavationnecessaryforthesefacilities.Thesecostsavingshelpoffsethigherupfrontcostsfordesign,landscapingmaterials,soilamendments,andalternativepavements.Educationandguidanceoncode-acceptableLIDpracticesisnecessarytoassistdevelopersinchoosingthesemethods.
•
•
•
�6 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
examples
CityofCyprusLIDGuideforDevelopers:www.ci.cypress.ca.us/online_forms/community_develpmnt_forms/low_impact_dvlpmt_guide.pdf
LIDTechnicalManualforPugetSound:www.psp.wa.gov/downloads/LID/LID_manual200�.pdf
CityofSeattleClientAssistanceMemo#���:GreenParkingLotswww.seattle.gov/DPD/Publications/CAM/CAM���.pdf
long term Recommendations
2. UpdateStandardsforStreets,FireAccessRoadsandPrivateDriveways.
Revisingcurrentroad,streetanddrivewaystandardstorequireLIDapproachesshouldbealongtermgoalfortheCityandCounty.Optionsincludereducingdrivewaywidthsfrom�2’to10’ or requiring pervious pavements; working with fire departments to reduce road widths in neighborhoods with low-rise buildings that do not require fire apparatus stabilizer jacks; and working with transportation departments to define standards for pervious pavements on public right-of-ways and fire access roads. The City of Washougal is in the process of implementing a variety of LID strategies as part of the Downtown Washougal Improvement project which could serveasamodelformakingupdateswithinVancouverandClarkCountycodes.
example
CityofWashougal:www.washougal.biz/cow/planning/downtown%20Washougal%20Improvements%20Narrative.pdf
EPAGreenStreetInitiativesAroundtheUS:www.epa.gov/owow/podcasts/greenstreetsusa.html
�. ConsiderStormwaterManagementUtilityFeeReductions.
Privatepropertiesthatimplementstormwaterdesignsolutionsthatreducerunoff(andthereforetheassociatedpollutantsthatrunoffcancontain)ratherthandirectingthatrunoffintomunicipalstormdrainsarelesseningtheburdenonpublicstormwaterinfrastructure.Aspublicstormwaterutilityfeesincrease,offeringfeereductionsforLIDapproachescanhelpencouragemoreonsitestormwaterquantityandqualitycontrolinadditiontohelpingrechargelocalaquifersandprotectwaterbodiesfrompollutantcontamination.Feereductionscouldbetieredtopromotemoreaggressivestrategies,fromrebatesforsquarefeetofreducedimpervioussurfaces,tolargergrantsformorecomprehensivenaturaldrainagestrategies.
example
KingCounty,WA,SurfaceWaterManagementFeeDiscountsandCost-SharingProgram:www.kingcounty.gov/environment/wlr/surface-water-mgt-fee/discount.aspx
•
•
•
•
•
•
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: �7CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
v. minimum paRking RequiRements
Background
Inurbanareas,closetopublictransportation,exemptionsfromminimumnumberofparkingspacescanhelpreduceimpervioussurfacesandallowforlargerareasforonsitesystemssuchasstormwater management best management practices (rain gardens, infiltration swales), rainwater cisterns,andonsitewastewatertreatment.Currentstandardsformultifamilydevelopmentswith4unitsorgreaterrequire�.�parkingspacesperdwellingunitwhereas�-,2-,and�-unitdevelopmentsrequire2spacesperdwellingunit.
Any changes or updates to minimum parking requirements must not adversely affect fire safety accessthroughincreasedon-streetparking.Instead,lookingtocomprehensivesolutionsforincreasingalternativemodesoftransportationsuchaswalking,bicycling,andpublictransportationwithinthecommunitywillhelpoffsettheneedfordeveloperstoprovideforvehicleparking.
short term Recommendations
�. ConsiderNewPoliciestoReduceMinimumParkingRequirementsasPartofanOverallStrategytoIncreaseAlternativeTransportationintheNextCity/CountyComprehensivePlanUpdate.
Incorporatinggoalsforreducingparkingaspartofthecomprehensiveplanupdateprocesswilllaythefoundationforfuturecoderevisions.Suggestionsinclude:allowingforareductionintherequirednumberofparkingspacesinexchangefordedicatedcar-sharevehiclespaces;reducedoreliminatedparkingrequirementsfordevelopmentslocatedinmixed-usedistricts;requirementsforbicyclestoragefacilities;developmentofpedestrian-orientedstreetstandards(widersidewalks,reducedsetbacks,lighting,landscaping,etc.)thatencouragewalking;requirementsforpedestrianconnectionsbetweenhousingdevelopmentsandnearbycommunityservicessuchasschools,grocerystores,churches,libraries,banks,etc;andplacingmaximumrequirementsonnumberofparkingspacesincertainzonestodiscourageunnecessary impervious surface coverage. Allowing greater flexibility for affordable housing projects to reduce minimum parking based on need can help reduce construction costs associatedwithparkingstructures.
examples
CityofAustin,Texas,DevelopmentCode,SubchapterE,Section2.4.2:ReductionofMinimumOff-StreetParkingRequirements.www.ci.austin.tx.us/development/downloads/final.pdf
ColoradoSpringsMixed-UseDevelopmentDesignManual.www.springsgov.com/Page.asp?NavID=4�07
USDepartmentofTransportationModelPolicy:IntegratingBicyclingandWalkingintoTransportationInfrastructure.www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bikeped/design.htm
•
•
•
�8 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
vi. setBaCks & sepaRation foR RainwateR haRvesting CisteRns
Background
Harvestingrainwateronasiteforuseinsidethebuildingtooffsetpotablewaterdemandoroutsidefor landscape irrigation is common on projects seeking to meet the Living Building Challenge, andinfactmayberequiredtomeetnetzerowatergoals.Duringthecasestudyreviewprocess,ClarkCountyplansexaminersnotedthatabovegroundrainwaterharvestingcisternsmustmeetsetback requirements from adjacent properties and must have a minimum of 8’ separation from the building.Onewaytoremovethisbarrieristoplacerainwatercisternsunderground;however,abovegroundcisternsmaybepreferredoncertainsitesforavarietyofreasons.Inparticular,affordablehousing projects may choose above ground cisterns to eliminate added costs for excavation or forupgradingtocisternsthatarestructurallydesignedtobebelowgrade.Setbackandbuildingseparationrequirementsareimportantformaintainingegressaroundbuildings.However,currentstandardscanunderminespaceavailableonthesiteforlocatingabovegroundcisterns.
short term Recommendations
�. ProvideGuidanceonDesigning,Permitting,Installing,andMaintainingRainwaterHarvestingCisterns into New Construction and Retrofit Applications.
Many jurisdictions have development code guidance documents on how to properly design and installrainwaterharvestingsystems,providingpermitapplicantswithconcreteinformationonrequired drawings, specifications and details for approvals. It is recommended that the City ofVancouverandClarkCountydevelopsimilarcodeguidanceutilizingthevaluableresourcesalreadyavailablefromothermunicipalities.
examples
StateofOregonSmartGuide:www.cbs.state.or.us/bcd/pdf/�660.pdf
Seattle Rainwater Harvesting for Beneficial Use: http://web�.seattle.gov/DPD/CAMs/CamDetail.aspx?cn=70�
2. ReviseCodeRequirementsforSetbacksandBuildingSeparationforAbove-GroundRainwaterCisterns.
Updatecodesthatdiscourageabovegroundcisterns.Suggestionsincludesetbackwaiversspecifically for cisterns such as those currently available for garden sheds, gazebos, and playhouses;andeliminatingbuildingsetbackrequirementsforcisternsaslongasstructuralloadingconsiderationsareproperlyaddressedbasedonthesizeofcistern(s)anddepthofbuildingfoundations.
•
•
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: �9CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
vii. ClusteR developments/Cottage housing
Background
Several of the case studies reviewed as part of the SARD project were demonstrations of smaller-footprintsinglefamilyormultifamilyhousingunitsclusteredaroundcommonareas.Thistypeof development requires flexibility in land use and development codes for increased density on portionsofanoverallsiteinordertoprotectorincreaseopenspaceandreduceoverallimpervioussurfaces. Additional benefits can include increased amenities such as common buildings or courtyardsandthesenseofcommunityconnectivity.InClarkCounty,ruralclusterdevelopmentsareonlyallowedwheredesignatedcriticalareasexist.WithintheCityofVancouver,clusteredcottage housing can be a green option for infill development on smaller parcels. However, no provisionsforcottagehousingdevelopmentcurrentlyexistwithintheCityorCounty.Whilethisbarrierwasnotchosenashighpriorityforexternalstakeholdergroups,developmentofcottagehousingcodeprovisionswouldaddressmanysustainabilitygoalsincludinghousingaffordabilityandreducedenergyuseandsiteimpactsfromsmallerhomes.Thereforeitissuggestedasalongertermrecommendation.
long term Recommendation
�. DevelopNewCityandCountyCottageHousingCodes.
Cottagehousingcodeslimitthesizeofunits,typicallytonomorethan�,000squarefeetinsize, allowing developers to increase the density on a parcel. Many jurisdictions in Washington State have developed cottage codes or allowed for cottage-style demonstration projects to helpestablishnewstandards.TheCityandCountyshouldutilizealready-establishedcodesfrom other jurisdictions to develop new cottage housing provisions, allowing for demonstration projects that help define standards in the interim.
examples
MunicipalResearchandServicesCenterofWashington:www.mrsc.org/subjects/planning/cottagehousing.aspx
Kirkland,WA
Marysville,WA
PortTownsend,WA
•
•
•
•
20 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
viii. wateR-Related BaRRieRs
Background
Living Building Challenge projects seek to source 100% of a building’s operational water use from capturedprecipitationorclosed-loopwatersystems,whilealsomanaging�00%ofstormwaterandbuildingwaterdischargeonsite.ThemostcomplexcodebarriersencounteredbyLivingBuildingChallenge projects are those that regulate water use and discharge. Obstacles span varying codes, fromdevelopmentcodestobuildingcodes,andrequiremyriadpermitapprovals,appealsandwaivers from several different jurisdictions. Report #1: Findingsincludesagraphicrepresentationof the complexity for residential building projects within the City of Vancouver and Clark County that seek approval for net zero water design strategies. As part of the SARD project, Cascadia convenedagroupofstakeholdersfromtheCityandCountybuildingdepartments,ClarkCountyPublicHealth,ClarkCountyPublicUtilities,ClarkRegionalWastewaterDistrict,thePlumbers&Steamfitters Union UA290, and the Washington State Department of Health and Department Of Ecologytoreviewanddiscussthewaterbarriersdiagrams.
Althoughtheexternalstakeholdergroupdidnotratewater-relatedbarriersasahighpriorityfortheCityandCountytotackleatthistime,aslocalgovernmentsincreasinglylooktoaddressthelargescaleenvironmental,economic,andsocialrisksassociatedwithclimatechangeandtherelationshipthatconventionalbuildinganddevelopmentpracticeshaveontheserisksitisanticipatedthatthewater-related barriers identified in this study will become a higher priority for Vancouver and Clark County.
short term Recommendation
�. ProvideGuidanceonDesigning,Permitting,Installing,andMaintainingRainwaterHarvestingCisterns.(See previous recommendation under “Setbacks & Separation for Rainwater Harvesting Cisterns”).
CurrentlytheRevisedCodeofWashington90.0�.2�0requiresawaterrightspermittoharvestrainwaterfromabuildingsite.However,theDepartmentofEcology(DOE)hasabacklogofover7,000waterrightapplicationsinthepermittingqueueanditisnotrecommendingthatgreenbuilding projects submit for a water rights permit at this time. Instead, DOE is striving to update theirregulationsandabilliscurrentlyinthelegislaturetorevisethewaterrightspermittingrequirements.Whileatleastonemunicipality,theCityofSeattle,hasgonethroughtheprocessofobtainingageneralpermitforallwaterrightswithincityboundaries,itwasrecommendedbyDOEthatVancouverandClarkCountycontinuetosupportrainwaterharvestingasavaluepracticeforreducingabuilding’spotablewateruseandhelpingtomanagestormwaterrunoff.Developingguidelinesforpermitapplicantsthataddressdesignandinstallationaswellaspublichealth challenges regarding filtration and disinfection is recommended.
long term Recommendation
2. Collaborate in a Neighborhood-Scale Net Zero Water Pilot Project.
Workingwiththedevelopmentcommunity,developademonstrationordinancethatallowsforflexibility within the current codes for a neighborhood-scale development with net zero water goals. Such a project would seek to source 100% of its water needs through onsite rainwater harvestingwithoutchemicaltreatmentand/orreuseofproperlytreatedwastewater,andtreat�00%ofitswastewateronsitethroughsustainabledesignstrategiessuchascompostingtoilets,greywatersystems,LivingMachines™and/orsmallscaletreatmenttechnologiessuchas membrane bioreactors. The pilot project should be required to monitor and report water useandwastewaterreduction,alongwithassociatedreductionsinutilitiesfees.Communicatefindings internally within City and County departments as well as to the development community,utilizingdatatosupportfuturecodeupdates.
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: 2�CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
next steps
StrategiesforremovingbarrierstotheLivingBuildingChallengewithinthelanduse,development,andbuildingcodesinVancouverandClarkCountycontainedwithinthisreportservesasaresourceforimplementingpolicies,programsandcodeorregulatorychanges.
Cascadia’s next steps as part of the SARD project will be to:
Work collaboratively with the City and County to evaluate costs and benefits of the prioritized recommendations,bothinternallytothepublicagenciesaswellasexternallytotheprivatedevelopmentcommunity.
Utilize the two residential project types studied under Cascadia’s Financial Study for the Living Building Challenge as the starting point for the cost/benefit analysis, modifying the Portland prototype projects to reflect Vancouver and Clark County construction costs and incentives.
A final report on the cost/benefits analysis will be delivered to Vancouver and Clark County in June2009.
•
•
22 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
ap
pen
dix
a:
full
lis
t of s
ugge
sted
str
ateg
ies
for
Rem
ovin
g Co
de &
Reg
ulat
ory
Bar
rier
s
RC
W:R
evis
edC
ode
ofW
ashi
ngto
nV
MC
:Van
couv
erM
unic
ipal
Cod
eC
CC
:Cla
rkC
ount
yC
ode
IB
C:In
tern
atio
nalB
uild
ing
Cod
eI
MC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lMec
hani
calC
ode
IFC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lFir
eC
ode
UP
C:
Uni
form
Plu
mbi
ngC
ode
WES
C:W
AS
tate
Ene
rgy
Cod
e
#LB
CP
rere
q.
Aff
ecte
dC
ode
Cod
eSe
ctio
nD
escr
iptio
nC
ode
Lang
uage
Pro
ject
Con
cern
Pro
pose
dR
ecom
men
datio
nR
efer
ence
/R
esou
rces
��0
Net
zer
oW
ater
RC
W90
.0�.
2�0
Wat
erR
ight
sP
erm
itA
ny p
erso
n, m
unic
ipal
cor
pora
tion,
firm
, ir
riga
tion
dist
rict
,ass
ocia
tion,
cor
pora
tion
orw
ater
use
rs’a
ssoc
iatio
nhe
reaf
ter
desi
ring
toa
ppro
pria
tew
ater
for
abe
nefic
ial u
se s
hall
mak
e an
app
licat
ion
to
the
depa
rtm
entf
ora
per
mit
tom
ake
such
ap
prop
riat
ion,
and
sha
llno
tuse
or
dive
rt
such
wat
ers
until
he
has
rece
ived
ap
erm
itfr
omth
ede
part
men
tas
inth
isc
hapt
er
prov
ided
.
Rai
nwat
eris
lega
llyc
onsi
dere
da
wat
err
esou
rce
ofth
eSt
ate,
m
anag
edb
yD
ept.
ofE
colo
gy.
Obt
aini
nga
per
mit
toh
arve
st
rain
wat
er fo
r be
nefic
ial u
se is
di
fficu
lt a
nd ti
me
cons
umin
g.
Dev
elop
gui
danc
eon
pe
rmitt
ing
requ
irem
ents
fo
rra
inw
ater
har
vest
ing
syst
ems.
Stat
eof
Ore
gon
Smar
tGui
de:
ww
w.c
bs.s
tate
.or.u
s/bc
d/pd
f/�6
60.p
df
Sea
ttle
Rai
nwat
erH
arve
stin
gfo
r B
enefi
cial
Use
Clie
nt
Ass
ista
nce
Mem
o70
�:h
ttp:
//w
eb�.
seat
tle.g
ov/D
PD
/CA
Ms/
Cam
Det
ail.a
spx?
cn=7
0�
2�0
Net
zer
oW
ater
CC
C40
.�70
.020
(C)(2
)C
onne
ctio
nto
P
ublic
Wat
er
Ina
reas
loca
ted
insi
deu
rban
gro
wth
bo
unda
ries
,whe
reth
epu
blic
age
ncy
purv
eyor
isw
illin
gan
dab
leto
pro
vide
saf
ean
dre
liabl
ese
rvic
e,c
onne
ctio
nto
pub
lic
wat
eris
req
uire
das
ac
ondi
tion
ofb
uild
ing
perm
itis
suan
cefo
ral
lnew
res
iden
tial
uses
ofl
ess
than
four
(4)u
nits
whe
npu
blic
wat
eris
with
in7
�0fe
eto
fthe
lot.
Con
nect
ion
top
ublic
wat
ers
yste
m
isr
equi
red.
Any
cha
nges
toth
is
requ
irem
entw
illn
eed
tob
eco
ordi
nate
dw
ithth
ose
agen
cies
pr
ovid
ing
wat
ers
ervi
ce–
City
of
Van
couv
era
ndC
lark
Pub
lic
Util
ities
.
Defi
ne c
ondi
tions
whi
ch
wou
ld a
llow
LB
C p
roje
cts
top
rovi
de�
00%
ofw
ater
ne
eds
thro
ugh
onsi
te
sour
ces,
allo
win
gfo
rbu
ildin
gpe
rmit
issu
ance
w
ithou
tac
onne
ctio
nto
the
mun
icip
alw
ater
su
pply
.
San
Juan
Cou
nty,
WA
:ww
w.
sanj
uanc
o.co
m/h
ealt
h/eh
swat
er.a
spx
��0
Net
zer
oW
ater
RC
W
�9.2
7.09
7C
onne
ctio
nto
P
ublic
Wat
er
Pub
licH
ealt
hw
ould
con
duct
aW
ater
A
dequ
acy
Veri
ficat
ion
Eval
uatio
n (W
AVE)
on
the
prop
osed
wat
ers
yste
mO
NLY
if
Com
mun
ityD
evel
opm
enti
ssue
da
conn
ectio
nto
pub
licw
ater
wai
ver.
W
ashi
ngto
nSa
teD
epar
tmen
tofH
ealt
hre
quir
esr
ainw
ater
har
vest
ing
syst
ems
to
bed
esig
ned
with
ade
quat
est
orag
ean
deq
uipp
ed w
ith fi
ltra
tion
and
disi
nfec
tion
(UV
or C
hlor
ine)
. T
he p
ropo
sed
filte
r m
ustm
eetA
NSI
or
NSF
dri
nkin
gw
ater
st
anda
rds
for
1-m
icro
n fil
trat
ion.
Att
his
time
Pub
licH
ealt
hdo
es
noth
ave
alo
calo
rdin
ance
for
wel
lsa
ndp
riva
ted
rink
ing
wat
er
syst
ems.
How
ever
;RC
W�
9.27
.097
re
quir
esa
pplic
ants
for
abu
ildin
gpe
rmit
for
abu
ildin
gne
cess
itatin
gdr
inki
ngw
ater
top
rovi
dee
vide
nce
ofa
nad
equa
tea
nds
afe
supp
lyfo
rth
ein
tend
edu
seo
fthe
bui
ldin
g.
Pub
licH
ealt
hw
ould
nee
da
wai
ver
from
Com
mun
ityD
evel
opm
ent
befo
rea
WAV
Eco
uld
ber
evie
wed
an
dco
mpl
eted
.
Defi
ne c
ondi
tions
whi
ch
wou
ld a
llow
LB
C p
roje
cts
top
rovi
de�
00%
ofw
ater
ne
eds
thro
ugh
onsi
te
sour
ces,
allo
win
gfo
rbu
ildin
gpe
rmit
issu
ance
w
ithou
tac
onne
ctio
nto
the
mun
icip
alw
ater
su
pply
.
San
Juan
Cou
nty,
WA
:ww
w.
sanj
uanc
o.co
m/h
ealt
h/eh
swat
er.a
spx
4�0
Net
zer
oW
ater
VMC
�6
.04.
�60
Con
nect
ion
to
Pub
licW
ater
-Fi
reflo
w
Wat
ers
uppl
yan
dhy
dran
ts(I
FC�
08):
Pri
vate
fire
flow
ade
quac
y no
t acc
epta
ble.
A
pub
lic s
yste
m fo
r fir
e pr
otec
tion
mus
t be
pro
vide
d.
Pub
lics
afet
yco
des
are
notm
ade
totr
ustp
riva
tem
aint
enan
cea
nd
fluct
uatin
g w
ater
sup
ply
vari
able
s.
Whe
refe
asib
le,a
llow
fo
rra
inw
ater
cis
tern
sto
mee
t fire
flow
nee
ds.
Sugg
estr
evis
ions
to
LBC
to e
xclu
de fi
reflo
w
from
net
zer
ow
ater
pr
ereq
uisi
te.
N/A
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: 2�CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009a
pp
end
ix a
: fu
ll l
ist o
f sug
gest
ed s
trat
egie
s fo
r R
emov
ing
Code
& R
egul
ator
y B
arri
ers
(con
tinue
d)
RC
W:R
evis
edC
ode
ofW
ashi
ngto
nV
MC
:Van
couv
erM
unic
ipal
Cod
eC
CC
:Cla
rkC
ount
yC
ode
IB
C:In
tern
atio
nalB
uild
ing
Cod
eI
MC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lMec
hani
calC
ode
IFC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lFir
eC
ode
UP
C:
Uni
form
Plu
mbi
ngC
ode
WES
C:W
AS
tate
Ene
rgy
Cod
e
#LB
CP
rere
q.
Aff
ecte
dC
ode
Cod
eSe
ctio
nD
escr
iptio
nC
ode
Lang
uage
Pro
ject
Con
cern
Pro
pose
dR
ecom
men
datio
nR
efer
ence
/R
esou
rces
��0
Net
zer
oW
ater
WAC
246-
290
and
24
6-29
�Tr
eatm
ent
ofH
arve
sted
R
ainw
ater
Pub
lic w
ater
sys
tem
s de
finiti
on:
Gro
up
AP
ublic
Wat
ers
yste
ms
erve
s��
or
mor
ere
side
ntia
lcon
nect
ions
or
2�o
rm
ore
peop
lep
erd
ayfo
r60
or
mor
eda
ysp
er
year
,and
Gro
upB
Pub
licW
ater
Sys
tem
sar
eco
nstr
ucte
dto
ser
vele
ssth
an�
�re
side
ntia
lser
vice
sor
con
stru
cted
to
ser
vea
nav
erag
eno
nres
iden
tial
popu
latio
nof
less
than
2�
per
day
for
60o
rm
ore
days
with
ina
cal
enda
rye
ar;o
ran
ynu
mbe
rof
peo
ple
for
less
than
60
days
w
ithin
ac
alen
dar
year
.Ex
ampl
esa
rea
ch
urch
,day
care
cen
ter,
sm
allb
usin
ess
or
clus
ter
ofh
omes
sha
ring
the
sam
ew
ater
so
urce
.
Rai
nwat
eris
con
side
red
asu
rfac
ew
ater
sou
rce.
The
trea
tmen
t,m
onito
ring
,rec
ord
keep
ing
and
cert
ifica
tion
requ
irem
ents
for
surf
ace
wat
ers
yste
ms
mak
esu
rfac
ew
ater
trea
tmen
tfor
sm
all
syst
ems
unfe
asib
lein
alm
osta
llci
rcum
stan
ces.
Th
e m
icro
n fil
ter
may
do
a go
od
job,
but
ther
e ar
e nu
mer
ous
com
plic
atio
nsw
ithth
ere
gula
tions
(s
tate
and
fede
ral)
asth
eys
tand
to
day,
incl
udin
g:
�.W
ashi
ngto
nSt
ate
DO
Hd
oes
not
appr
ove
poin
tofu
setr
eatm
ent
syst
ems
2.
Sur
face
wat
ers
yste
ms
requ
ire
ace
rtifi
ed o
pera
tor
�.
Sur
face
wat
ers
yste
ms
mus
tha
vec
ontin
uous
turb
idity
and
ch
lori
ner
esid
ualm
onito
ring
4.
Chl
orin
atio
nis
man
dato
ryfo
rsu
rfac
ew
ater
sys
tem
s.
Allo
wfo
rU
Vdi
sinf
ectio
nan
dsa
ndo
r�-
mic
ron
cart
ridg
e fil
trat
ion
as
prop
osed
inth
eca
se
stud
yco
mpe
ndiu
m
pack
age.
Hay
war
dR
ainw
ater
San
dFi
lter
Pro
duct
Spe
cific
atio
n.
ww
w.h
ayw
ardn
et.c
om/
ingr
ound
/pro
duct
s/fil
ters
/sa
nd.c
fm
6��
Wat
er
Dis
char
geVM
C
�4.0
8.0�
�C
onne
ctio
nto
P
ublic
Sew
er
Each
res
iden
tialo
rco
mm
erci
alw
ater
cu
stom
ere
ither
with
ino
rw
ithou
tthe
city
sh
allc
onne
cth
iso
rhe
rpr
emis
esto
ac
ity
sew
erif
ac
itys
ewer
isa
vaila
ble
ther
eto,
as
defi
ned
in V
MC
14.
08.0
15. (
Ord
. M-1
956
§6
,�97
9).
Ther
eis
cur
rent
lyn
oex
empt
ion
to
conn
ectio
nw
hen
sew
eris
ava
ilabl
eto
the
site
.
Cod
ech
ange
toa
llow
al
tern
ativ
esa
sap
prov
ed
byth
epu
blic
wor
ks
dire
ctor
.
N/A
7��
Wat
er
Dis
char
geC
CC
40.�
70.0
�0C
Con
nect
ion
to
Pub
licS
ewer
In
side
UG
A’s,
con
nect
ion
top
ublic
sew
eris
re
quir
eda
sa
cond
ition
ofb
uild
ing
perm
itis
suan
cefo
ran
yne
ws
truc
ture
unl
ess
cert
ain
exce
ptio
nsa
pply
,the
na
sew
er
wai
ver
can
beg
rant
ed.
Con
nect
ion
top
ublic
sew
eris
re
quir
edu
nles
sa
sew
erw
aive
rca
nbe
gra
nted
.Any
cha
nge
toth
isr
equi
rem
entn
eeds
to
bec
oord
inat
edw
iths
anita
ry
sew
ers
ervi
cep
urve
yors
–C
ity
ofV
anco
uver
and
Cla
rkR
egio
nal
Was
tew
ater
Dis
tric
t.
Cod
ech
ange
toa
llow
al
tern
ativ
esa
sap
prov
ed
byth
epu
blic
wor
ks
dire
ctor
.
N/A
24 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
ap
pen
dix
a:
full
lis
t of s
ugge
sted
str
ateg
ies
for
Rem
ovin
g Co
de &
Reg
ulat
ory
Bar
rier
s (c
ontin
ued)
RC
W:R
evis
edC
ode
ofW
ashi
ngto
nV
MC
:Van
couv
erM
unic
ipal
Cod
eC
CC
:Cla
rkC
ount
yC
ode
IB
C:In
tern
atio
nalB
uild
ing
Cod
eI
MC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lMec
hani
calC
ode
IFC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lFir
eC
ode
UP
C:
Uni
form
Plu
mbi
ngC
ode
WES
C:W
AS
tate
Ene
rgy
Cod
e
#LB
CP
rere
q.
Aff
ecte
dC
ode
Cod
eSe
ctio
nD
escr
iptio
nC
ode
Lang
uage
Pro
ject
Con
cern
Pro
pose
dR
ecom
men
datio
nR
efer
ence
/R
esou
rces
8�
Mat
eria
ls
Red
list
6 Con
stru
ctio
nC
arbo
nFo
otpr
int
IBC
�09.
�G
roup
R-2
B
uild
ings
of
Typ
eIII
A
cons
truc
tion
The
heig
htli
mita
tion
for
build
ings
ofT
ype
IIIA
con
stru
ctio
nin
Gro
upR
-2s
hall
be
incr
ease
dto
six
sto
ries
and
7�’
feet
whe
re
the
first
floo
r co
nstr
uctio
n ab
ove
the
base
men
t has
a fi
re-r
esis
tanc
e ra
ting
of
not l
ess
than
3 h
ours
and
the
floo
r ar
ea
is s
ubdi
vide
d by
2 h
our
fire
resi
stan
ce fi
re
wal
lsin
toa
reas
not
less
than
�00
0sf
.
Cod
ein
cent
iviz
ess
teel
or
conc
rete
bu
ildin
gs o
ver
woo
d du
e to
fire
re
sist
ance
req
uire
men
ts.W
ood
is b
ette
r ch
oice
for
LBC
pro
ject
s ba
sed
onr
egio
nala
vaila
bilit
y,
rene
wab
ler
esou
rce,
less
em
bodi
ed
ener
gy,a
ndb
ette
rU
-val
ue.
For
woo
dco
nstr
uctio
n,th
isc
ode
requ
ires
the
use
of fi
re r
esis
tant
pl
ywoo
d,s
ome
ofw
hich
con
tain
sto
xins
on
the
mat
eria
lsr
edlis
t.Fi
re
resi
stan
tply
woo
dpr
oduc
tsth
atd
ono
tcon
tain
red
listm
ater
ials
are
m
ore
cost
ly.
Con
side
ral
tern
ativ
em
ater
ials
to fi
re
reta
rdan
tply
woo
d:
-co
ncre
teb
lock
(loc
al)
-dim
ensi
onal
lum
ber
roof
dec
king
that
mee
ts
type
IVc
onst
ruct
ion
and/
orh
our
ratin
g -
an a
ppro
ved
3 ho
ur fi
re
rate
dsy
stem
-
hybr
idfr
amin
gsy
stem
sth
atu
seh
eavy
tim
ber
and
mom
entc
onne
ctio
ns
toe
limin
ate
plyw
ood
Not
e:T
om
eett
her
edlis
tfir
e pr
otec
tion
trea
tmen
t m
ayn
otc
onta
in:
-hal
ogen
s-s
ulph
ates
-a
mm
oniu
mp
hosp
hate
s-a
dded
form
alde
hyde
s
Fede
ralG
reen
Con
stru
ctio
nG
uide
for
Spec
ifier
s
ww
w.w
bdg.
org/
desi
gn/
gree
nspe
c.ph
p
See
mul
tiple
list
ings
in
Con
stru
ctio
n Sp
ecifi
catio
ns
Inst
itute
(CSI
)for
mat
for
sugg
este
d sp
ecifi
catio
ns o
f gr
een
mat
eria
ls.
9�
Mat
eria
ls
Red
list
IBC
704.
��Fi
rer
etar
dant
w
ood
exce
ptio
ns
tor
equi
red
para
pets
Wal
lsth
atte
rmin
ate
atr
oofs
ofn
ot
less
than
2-h
our
fire-
resi
stan
t-ra
ted
cons
truc
tion
(or
whe
reth
ero
of,i
nclu
ding
th
ede
cka
nds
uppo
rtin
gco
nstr
uctio
n,is
co
nstr
ucte
den
tirel
yof
non
com
bust
ible
m
ater
ials
.
Cod
e re
quir
es th
e us
e of
fire
re
sist
antp
lyw
ood,
som
eof
whi
ch
cont
ains
toxi
nso
nth
em
ater
ials
re
dlis
t.Fi
rer
esis
tant
ply
woo
dpr
oduc
tsth
atd
ono
tcon
tain
red
list
mat
eria
lsa
rem
ore
cost
ly.
Sugg
este
dO
ptio
ns:
-add
ap
arap
et
-c
reat
ean
alt
erna
te
deta
ilth
ata
llow
sfo
rno
n-fir
e ra
ted
plyw
ood
Alt
erna
tive
mat
eria
lsto
fir
e re
tard
ant p
lyw
ood:
-
dim
ensi
onal
lum
ber
roof
dec
king
that
mee
ts2
ho
urr
oofa
ssem
bly
-
Add
ition
alla
yers
of
gyps
umb
oard
atf
ram
ed
fire
wal
ls a
nd r
oof/
ceili
ng
asse
mbl
ies
-hy
brid
fram
ing
syst
ems
that
use
hea
vyti
mbe
ran
dm
omen
tcon
nect
ions
to
elim
inat
epl
ywoo
d.
Fede
ralG
reen
Con
stru
ctio
nG
uide
for
Spec
ifier
s06
0�
7�(0
6070
)Woo
dTr
eatm
ent
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: 2�CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009a
pp
end
ix a
: fu
ll l
ist o
f sug
gest
ed s
trat
egie
s fo
r R
emov
ing
Code
& R
egul
ator
y B
arri
ers
(con
tinue
d)
RC
W:R
evis
edC
ode
ofW
ashi
ngto
nV
MC
:Van
couv
erM
unic
ipal
Cod
eC
CC
:Cla
rkC
ount
yC
ode
IB
C:In
tern
atio
nalB
uild
ing
Cod
eI
MC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lMec
hani
calC
ode
IFC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lFir
eC
ode
UP
C:
Uni
form
Plu
mbi
ngC
ode
WES
C:W
AS
tate
Ene
rgy
Cod
e
#LB
CP
rere
q.
Aff
ecte
dC
ode
Cod
eSe
ctio
nD
escr
iptio
nC
ode
Lang
uage
Pro
ject
Con
cern
Pro
pose
dR
ecom
men
datio
nR
efer
ence
/R
esou
rces
�04
Net
zer
oEn
ergy
IBC
�20�
.2A
ttic
Spa
ces
-re
quir
ed
insu
latio
n
Encl
osed
att
ics
and
encl
osed
raf
ter
spac
esfo
rmed
whe
rec
eilin
gsa
rea
pplie
ddi
rect
lyto
the
unde
rsid
eof
roo
ffra
min
gm
embe
rss
hall
have
cro
ssv
entil
atio
nfo
rea
chs
epar
ate
spac
eby
ven
tilat
ing
open
ings
pro
tect
eda
gain
stth
een
tran
ce
ofr
ain
and
now
.B
lock
ing
and
brid
ging
sh
allb
ear
rang
eds
oas
not
toin
terf
ere
with
the
mov
emen
tofa
ir.A
min
imum
of�
in
cho
fair
spac
esh
allb
epr
ovid
edb
etw
een
the
insu
latio
nan
dth
ero
ofs
heat
hing
.Th
ene
tfre
eve
ntila
ting
area
sha
llno
tbe
less
than
�/�
�0o
fthe
are
aof
the
spac
eve
ntila
ted,
with
�0
perc
ento
fthe
req
uire
dve
ntila
ting
area
pro
vide
dby
ven
tilat
ors
loca
ted
inth
eup
per
port
ion
ofth
esp
ace
tob
eve
ntila
ted
atle
ast�
feet
abo
vee
ave
orc
orni
cev
ents
with
the
bala
nce
ofth
ere
quir
edv
entil
atio
npr
ovid
edb
yea
veo
rco
rnic
eve
nts.
Vent
edr
oofi
nth
isc
limat
eno
tne
cess
ary.
By
requ
irin
gve
nt,
LBC
pro
ject
s ca
nnot
max
imiz
e in
sula
tion
inr
afte
rca
vity
mak
ing
it m
ore
diffi
cult
to a
chie
ve n
et
zero
ene
rgy
requ
irem
ent.
Thi
sis
targ
eted
toc
hang
ein
the
2009
W
ashi
ngto
nSt
ate
Ener
gyC
ode
upda
tes.
Sugg
este
dO
ptio
n:
-Elim
inat
eea
vev
entin
gbu
tnot
roo
fven
ting.
Alt
erna
tive
Opt
ions
:
-A
llow
insu
latio
nto
be
full
dept
h of
jois
t spa
ce
ifde
wp
oint
cal
cula
tions
ar
esu
bmitt
edth
ats
how
co
nden
satio
nw
illn
otb
efo
rmed
.
-Pro
vide
ene
rgy
anal
ysis
th
ats
how
str
adeo
ff
U-v
alue
cal
cula
tions
to
supp
orte
nerg
ysa
ving
s.
Bui
ldin
gSc
ienc
eC
orpo
ratio
nL
stib
urek
,Jos
eph,
U
nder
stan
ding
Att
ic
Vent
ilatio
n,B
SD-�
02,O
ctob
er
2006
.
��4
Net
zer
oEn
ergy
IBC
�20�
.�.2
Und
erF
loor
Ve
ntila
tion
The
min
imum
net
are
aof
ven
tilat
ion
open
ing
shal
lnot
be
less
than
�s
quar
efo
otfo
rea
ch�
�0s
fofc
raw
lspa
cea
reas
.
Gre
yar
eas
inc
ode
arou
ndb
est
prac
tice
for
ener
gy e
ffici
ency
an
din
door
air
qua
lity
whi
chis
to
mec
hani
cally
con
ditio
ncr
awls
pace
an
del
imin
ate
pass
ive
vent
ing
of
cold
out
door
air.
Defi
ne c
ondi
tions
whi
ch
wou
lda
llow
cra
wls
pace
to
not
be
vent
ilate
d.(i
.e.
shor
tbas
emen
tcon
cept
).P
rovi
dea
rad
on
miti
gatio
nsy
stem
in
cond
ition
edc
raw
lspa
ce
that
pro
vide
sm
oist
ure
prot
ectio
n.
Bui
ldin
gSc
ienc
eC
orpo
ratio
nLs
tibur
ek,J
osep
h,
Und
erst
andi
ngA
ttic
Ve
ntila
tion,
BSD
-�02
,Oct
ober
20
06.
�24
Net
zer
oEn
ergy
�2C
ivili
zed
Envi
ronm
ent
IBC
�20�
.2W
indo
wa
rea
requ
ired
for
Nat
ural
Lig
ht
The
min
imum
net
gla
zed
area
sha
llno
tbe
less
than
8 p
erce
nt o
f the
floo
r ar
ea o
f the
ro
oms
erve
d.
Itis
not
cle
arth
ere
ason
for
the
8% m
inim
um. S
ome
proj
ects
may
be
des
igne
dto
use
less
whi
le
also
ens
urin
gad
equa
teli
ghta
nd
incr
easi
ng e
nerg
y ef
ficie
ncy.
Inst
ead
ofa
man
date
dpe
rcen
tage
for
win
dow
ar
ea,c
onsi
der
requ
irin
gth
atb
uild
ings
pro
vide
ac
cess
toli
ghta
nda
ir
sim
ilar
toE
urop
ean
build
ing
code
s.
BO
UB
EKR
I,M
oham
ed,
A
Ove
rvie
wo
fThe
Cur
rent
Sta
te
ofD
aylig
htL
egis
latio
n,
Jour
nalo
fthe
Hum
an-
Envi
ronm
enta
lSys
tem
,Vol
.7;
No.
2:�
7–6�
,200
4.
Tabl
e2.
Rec
omm
ende
dD
aylig
htle
vels
per
deg
ree
of
diffi
cult
y of
vis
ual t
ask
in th
e G
erm
anD
IN�
0�4-
4St
anda
rd.
Tabl
e�:
Rec
omm
ende
dw
indo
ws
ize
for
dayl
ight
ing
inth
eG
erm
anD
IN�
0�4-
4St
anda
rd.
��4
Net
zer
oEn
ergy
IBC
�20�
.�A
rtifi
cial
Lig
ht
-av
erag
eof
�0
foot
-ca
ndle
s
Art
ifici
al li
ght s
hall
be p
rovi
ded
that
is
ade
quat
eto
pro
vide
an
aver
age
illum
inat
ion
of�
0fo
ot-c
andl
eso
ver
the
area
oft
her
oom
ata
hei
ghto
f�0
inch
es
abov
e th
e flo
or le
vel.
Man
dato
ryfo
ot-c
andl
ere
quir
emen
tdo
esn
ota
ddre
ssn
eeds
ofs
pace
.Fo
rin
stan
ce,a
bed
room
mig
ht
need
less
art
ifici
al li
ghtin
g. O
ver-
light
ing
spac
ese
ncou
rage
shi
gher
en
ergy
use
.
Use
low
este
ndo
fthe
Ill
umin
atin
gEn
gine
erin
gSo
ciet
ygu
idel
ines
as
am
anda
ted
light
leve
lra
ther
than
�0
foot
-ca
ndle
s.
Illum
inat
ion
Engi
neer
ing
Soci
ety
Gui
delin
es
26 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
ap
pen
dix
a:
full
lis
t of s
ugge
sted
str
ateg
ies
for
Rem
ovin
g Co
de &
Reg
ulat
ory
Bar
rier
s (c
ontin
ued)
RC
W:R
evis
edC
ode
ofW
ashi
ngto
nV
MC
:Van
couv
erM
unic
ipal
Cod
eC
CC
:Cla
rkC
ount
yC
ode
IB
C:In
tern
atio
nalB
uild
ing
Cod
eI
MC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lMec
hani
calC
ode
IFC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lFir
eC
ode
UP
C:
Uni
form
Plu
mbi
ngC
ode
WES
C:W
AS
tate
Ene
rgy
Cod
e
#LB
CP
rere
q.
Aff
ecte
dC
ode
Cod
eSe
ctio
nD
escr
iptio
nC
ode
Lang
uage
Pro
ject
Con
cern
Pro
pose
dR
ecom
men
datio
nR
efer
ence
/R
esou
rces
�44
Net
zer
oEn
ergy
IBC
�604
.8.�
Use
of
Stra
wb
ale
asa
late
ral
elem
ent
Anc
hora
geo
fthe
roo
fto
wal
lsa
nd
colu
mns
,and
ofw
alls
and
col
umns
to
foun
datio
ns,s
hall
bep
rovi
ded
tor
esis
tthe
up
lifta
nds
lidin
gfo
rces
that
res
ultf
rom
th
eap
plic
atio
nof
the
pres
crib
edlo
ads.
Stra
wb
ale
ish
ighl
yin
sula
ted,
lo
w-c
ostw
allm
ater
ial.
Stru
ctur
al
stre
ngth
ofs
traw
bal
eno
tkno
wn
and
test
ing
ise
xpen
sive
.
Allo
wu
seo
fexi
stin
gst
anda
rds
to d
efine
st
ruct
ural
str
engt
h.
Add
ress
wat
erin
trus
ion
issu
es.
OR
Res
.Cod
eA
ppen
dix
R,
sect
ion
AR
106
& A
R10
7 de
fine
bear
ing
wal
ls,h
eigh
tlim
its
and
min
imal
con
nect
ions
.
C
alifo
rnia
Hea
lth
and
Safe
ty
Cod
e�8
94.�
to�
98�.
�.4.
��4
Net
zer
oEn
ergy
IBC
Tabl
e60
2U
seo
fStr
aw
bale
whe
re
fire
ratin
g is
re
quir
ed
Tabl
e 60
2.pr
ovid
es fi
re r
atin
g re
quir
emen
tsfo
rex
teri
orw
alls
.St
raw
bal
eis
hig
hly
insu
late
d,
low
-cos
twal
lmat
eria
l.N
otc
ost
effe
ctiv
e if
addi
tiona
l fire
pro
tect
ive
mat
eria
lis
requ
ired
and
test
ing
is
expe
nsiv
e.
Allo
wu
seo
fstr
aw
bale
whe
nco
vere
dw
ith
plas
ter
ors
tucc
oof
at
leas
t7/8
”th
ickn
ess.
OR
Res
.Cod
eA
ppen
dix
R,
sect
ion
AR
106
& A
R10
7 de
fine
bear
ing
wal
ls,h
eigh
tlim
its
and
min
imal
con
nect
ions
.
C
alifo
rnia
Hea
lth
and
Safe
ty
Cod
e�8
94.�
to�
98�.
�.4.
�6�
Mat
eria
ls
Red
list
8 App
ropr
iate
M
ater
ials
R
adiu
s
IBC
2�0�
.�P
rese
rvat
ive
-tre
ated
w
ood.
Lum
ber,
tim
ber,
ply
woo
d,p
iles
and
pole
ssu
ppor
ting
perm
anen
tstr
uctu
res
requ
ired
by
Sec
tion
2�04
.��
tob
epr
eser
vativ
etr
eate
dsh
allc
onfo
rmto
the
requ
irem
ents
of
the
appl
icab
leA
WPA
sta
ndar
dU
�an
dM
4fo
rth
esp
ecie
s,p
rodu
ct,p
rese
rvat
ive
and
end
use.
Pre
serv
ativ
esh
allb
elis
ted
inS
ectio
n4
ofth
eAW
PAU
�.L
umbe
ran
dpl
ywoo
dus
edin
woo
dfo
unda
tions
sy
stem
ssh
allc
onfo
rmto
Cha
pter
�8.
Mos
twoo
dpr
eser
vativ
esa
ppro
ved
byc
ode
are
onth
eLB
Cm
ater
ials
re
dlis
t.N
atur
als
peci
esw
ithin
the
mat
eria
lsr
adiu
sre
quir
emen
ts
wou
ldb
ea
bett
ero
ptio
nfo
rLB
C p
roje
cts.
Bur
den
of p
roof
is
on
the
desi
gnte
amto
pro
vide
do
cum
enta
tion
for
late
rnat
ives
that
m
eett
hein
tent
oft
hec
ode.
Res
earc
hlo
calw
oods
th
ath
ave
deca
yre
sist
ant
prop
ertie
san
dcr
eate
co
deg
uide
sth
ata
llow
th
ese
exce
ptio
nsto
be
used
ifc
ondi
tions
are
m
et.
Nat
ural
rot
res
ista
nt
spec
ies
inin
crea
sing
or
der
ofp
refe
renc
e(h
eart
woo
don
ly):
-Red
woo
d(li
mite
dav
aila
bilit
y)-B
lack
Loc
ust(
East
ern
fore
sts)
-B
lack
Wal
nut
-Bal
dC
ypre
ss(F
lori
da)
-Whi
teO
ak(B
urr
Oak
,O
rego
n O
ak 1
360j
anka
)-W
este
rnR
edC
edar
(W
este
rnS
tate
s35
0jan
ka)
-Eas
tern
Red
Ced
ar
(Mid
wes
tand
Eas
t,90
0jan
ka)
Oth
erp
rodu
cts:
-W
ood
Acy
tela
tion
(pic
kled
with
vin
egar
)-T
imbe
rSil
(gla
ssw
ood
Dec
ayg
rade
�0)
P
rovi
deli
nks
to
appr
oved
nat
ural
m
ater
ials
ourc
es.
Fede
ralG
reen
Con
stru
ctio
nG
uide
for
Spec
ifier
s06
0�
7�(0
6070
)Woo
dTr
eatm
ent
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: 27CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009a
pp
end
ix a
: fu
ll l
ist o
f sug
gest
ed s
trat
egie
s fo
r R
emov
ing
Code
& R
egul
ator
y B
arri
ers
(con
tinue
d)
RC
W:R
evis
edC
ode
ofW
ashi
ngto
nV
MC
:Van
couv
erM
unic
ipal
Cod
eC
CC
:Cla
rkC
ount
yC
ode
IB
C:In
tern
atio
nalB
uild
ing
Cod
eI
MC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lMec
hani
calC
ode
IFC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lFir
eC
ode
UP
C:
Uni
form
Plu
mbi
ngC
ode
WES
C:W
AS
tate
Ene
rgy
Cod
e
#LB
CP
rere
q.
Aff
ecte
dC
ode
Cod
eSe
ctio
nD
escr
iptio
nC
ode
Lang
uage
Pro
ject
Con
cern
Pro
pose
dR
ecom
men
datio
nR
efer
ence
/R
esou
rces
�7�
Mat
eria
ls
Red
list
8 App
ropr
iate
M
ater
ials
R
adiu
s
IBC
2�0�
.4W
ood
supp
orte
dby
Ext
erio
rFo
unda
tion
Woo
dfr
amin
gm
embe
rsa
ndfu
rrin
gst
rips
at
tach
edd
irec
tly
toth
ein
teri
oro
fext
erio
rm
ason
ryo
rco
ncre
tew
alls
bel
owg
rade
sh
allb
eof
app
rove
dna
tura
llyd
urab
leo
rpr
eser
vativ
etr
eate
dw
ood.
Mos
twoo
dpr
eser
vativ
esa
ppro
ved
byc
ode
are
onth
eLB
Cm
ater
ials
re
dlis
t.N
atur
als
peci
esw
ithin
the
mat
eria
lsr
adiu
sre
quir
emen
ts
wou
ldb
ea
bett
ero
ptio
nfo
rLB
C p
roje
cts.
Bur
den
of p
roof
is
on
the
desi
gnte
amto
pro
vide
do
cum
enta
tion
for
alte
rnat
ives
that
m
eett
hein
tent
oft
hec
ode.
See
reco
mm
enda
tions
ab
ove
for
natu
ralr
ot
resi
stan
tspe
cies
.
A
lter
nativ
eO
ptio
n:
-Sep
arat
ew
ood
from
ot
her
mat
eria
lsb
ym
ore
than
6”,
or
use
natu
ral
ora
ppro
ved
trea
tmen
ts
whe
rew
ood
isn
ot
subj
ect t
o w
ater
spl
ash.
Fede
ralG
reen
Con
stru
ctio
nG
uide
for
Spec
ifier
s06
0�
7�(0
6070
)Woo
dTr
eatm
ent
�8�
Mat
eria
ls
Red
list
8 App
ropr
iate
M
ater
ials
R
adiu
s
IBC
2�04
.��
Woo
dus
ed
abov
egr
ound
,woo
dsu
ppor
ted
bye
xter
ior
foun
datio
ns,
exte
rior
wal
ls
belo
wg
rade
on
insi
deo
fm
ason
ry,
slee
pers
and
si
lls,w
ood
sidi
ng
Woo
dus
eda
bove
gro
und
inth
elo
catio
ns
note
dsh
allb
ena
tura
llyd
urab
lew
ood
or
pres
erva
tive
trea
ted
woo
dus
ing
wat
er
born
epr
eser
vativ
es,i
nac
cord
ance
with
AW
PAU
Ifor
abo
veg
roun
dus
e.
Mos
twoo
dpr
eser
vativ
esa
ppro
ved
byc
ode
are
onth
eLB
Cm
ater
ials
re
dlis
t.N
atur
als
peci
esw
ithin
the
mat
eria
lsr
adiu
sre
quir
emen
ts
wou
ldb
ea
bett
ero
ptio
nfo
rLB
C p
roje
cts.
Bur
den
of p
roof
is
on
the
desi
gnte
amto
pro
vide
do
cum
enta
tion
for
alte
rnat
ives
that
m
eett
hein
tent
oft
hec
ode.
See
reco
mm
enda
tions
lis
ted
abov
eun
der
IBC
2�
0�.4
.
Fede
ralG
reen
Con
stru
ctio
nG
uide
for
Spec
ifier
s06
0�
7�(0
6070
)Woo
dTr
eatm
ent
�94
Net
zer
oEn
ergy
WSE
C20
�D
efini
tion:
D
esig
nH
eatin
gan
dC
oolin
gC
ondi
tions
The
heat
ing
orc
oolin
gou
tdoo
rde
sign
te
mpe
ratu
res
shal
lbe
sele
cted
from
0.6
%
colu
mn
for
win
ter,
and
0.�
%c
olum
nfo
rsu
mm
erfr
omth
eP
uget
Sou
ndC
hapt
er
ofA
SHR
AE
publ
icat
ion
“Rec
omm
ende
dO
utdo
orD
esig
nTe
mpe
ratu
res,
W
ashi
ngto
nSt
ate,
ASH
RA
E.”
Isth
isth
eri
ghtt
empe
ratu
re
refe
renc
eto
use
for
Vanc
ouve
ran
dC
lark
Cou
nty?
Allo
win
gw
ider
de
sign
tem
pera
ture
sm
ayr
esul
tin
high
er e
ffici
ency
. La
rger
pro
ject
s ca
nde
mon
stra
teth
isth
roug
hen
ergy
mod
elin
g; s
mal
ler
proj
ects
an
daf
ford
able
hou
sing
wou
ld
bene
fit fr
om p
resc
ript
ive
appr
oach
. A
SHR
AE
��-2
004
prov
ides
ex
pand
edc
omfo
rtc
rite
ria
for
natu
rally
ven
tilat
eds
pace
s.
Con
side
rus
ing
99%
dat
afo
rhe
atin
gan
d�%
or
2%
data
for
cool
ing.
P
rovi
de
apr
escr
iptiv
epa
thfo
rsy
stem
san
alys
is.
ASH
RA
E��
-2
004
204
Net
zer
oEn
ergy
WSE
C20
�D
efini
tions
: A
dvan
ced
Fram
ing
Adv
ance
dFr
amed
Wal
ls:
Stud
sfr
amed
on
24
inch
cen
ters
with
dou
ble
top
plat
ean
dsi
ngle
bot
tom
pla
te.
Cor
ners
use
two
stud
sor
oth
erm
eans
off
ully
insu
latin
gco
rner
s,a
ndo
nes
tud
isu
sed
tos
uppo
rt
each
hea
der.
Hea
ders
con
sist
ofd
oubl
e2x
m
ater
ialw
ithR
-�0
insu
latio
nbe
twee
nth
ehe
ader
and
ext
erio
rsh
eath
ing.
Inte
rior
pa
rtiti
onw
all/
exte
rior
wal
lint
erse
ctio
ns
are
fully
insu
late
din
the
exte
rior
wal
l.
(See
Sta
ndar
dFr
amin
gan
dSe
ctio
n�0
0�.2
oft
his
Cod
e.)A
dvan
ced
Fram
ed
Cei
lings
:Adv
ance
dfr
amin
gas
sum
esfu
llan
dev
end
epth
ofi
nsul
atio
nex
tend
ing
to
the
outs
ide
edge
ofe
xter
ior
wal
ls.(
See
Stan
dard
Fra
min
gan
dSe
ctio
n�0
07.2
of
this
Cod
e.)
Oth
er d
efini
tions
of a
dvan
ced
fram
ing
incl
ude
sing
leto
ppl
ate
allo
win
gde
crea
sed
use
of
mat
eria
lsa
ndin
crea
sed
ener
gy
effic
ienc
y.
Req
uire
trus
ses
/roo
ffr
amin
gto
sta
ckto
ha
vea
dvan
ced
fram
ing.
C
onsi
der
adop
ting
one
ofth
egu
ides
cur
rent
ly
deve
lope
dsu
cha
sth
eU
SD
epar
tmen
tof
Ener
gy’s
Adv
ance
dW
all
Fram
ing
Gui
de.
Nat
ural
Res
ourc
esD
efen
se
Cou
ncil
Edm
inst
er,A
nn;Y
assa
,Sam
i;M
cDer
mid
,Mat
thew
, Ef
ficie
nt
Woo
dU
sei
nR
esid
entia
lC
onst
ruct
ion:
AP
ract
ical
Gui
deto
Sa
ving
Woo
d,M
oney
and
For
ests
,N
atur
alR
esou
rces
Def
ense
C
ounc
il,N
ewY
ork,
NY,
�99
8.
Tool
base
Ser
vice
sde
velo
ped
byth
eN
AH
BR
esea
rch
Cen
ter
ww
w.to
olba
se.o
rg/p
df/t
echi
nv/
ovea
dvan
cedf
ram
ingt
echn
ique
s_te
chsp
ec.p
df
ww
w.to
olba
se.o
rg/T
echn
olog
y-In
vent
ory/
Who
le-H
ouse
-Sys
tem
s/ad
vanc
e-fr
amin
g-te
chni
ques
Jo
urna
lofL
ight
Con
stru
ctio
n A
dvan
ced
Fram
ing
Boo
k#
AF0
02
28 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
ap
pen
dix
a:
full
lis
t of s
ugge
sted
str
ateg
ies
for
Rem
ovin
g Co
de &
Reg
ulat
ory
Bar
rier
s (c
ontin
ued)
RC
W:R
evis
edC
ode
ofW
ashi
ngto
nV
MC
:Van
couv
erM
unic
ipal
Cod
eC
CC
:Cla
rkC
ount
yC
ode
IB
C:In
tern
atio
nalB
uild
ing
Cod
eI
MC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lMec
hani
calC
ode
IFC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lFir
eC
ode
UP
C:
Uni
form
Plu
mbi
ngC
ode
WES
C:W
AS
tate
Ene
rgy
Cod
e
#LB
CP
rere
q.
Aff
ecte
dC
ode
Cod
eSe
ctio
nD
escr
iptio
nC
ode
Lang
uage
Pro
ject
Con
cern
Pro
pose
dR
ecom
men
datio
nR
efer
ence
/R
esou
rces
2�4
Net
zer
oEn
ergy
WSE
C�0
�.2
Hea
ting
&C
oolin
g-
mor
est
ring
ent
enve
lope
re
quir
emen
ts
Ab
uild
ing
that
isd
esig
ned
tob
ebo
th
heat
eda
ndc
oole
dsh
allm
eett
hem
ore
stri
ngen
toft
heh
eatin
gor
coo
ling
requ
irem
ents
as
requ
ired
inth
isc
ode
whe
nre
quir
emen
tso
fthe
ext
erio
ren
velo
ped
iffer
.
This
cod
eop
tion
does
not
allo
w
for
ener
gyp
rogr
amm
ing,
or
max
imiz
ing
effic
ienc
ies
betw
een
area
sof
the
build
ing
whi
chm
ight
pr
ovid
ew
aste
hea
t.Th
eref
ore,
LB
C p
roje
ct te
ams
have
red
uced
op
port
uniti
esto
des
ign
the
mos
tap
prop
riat
een
velo
peto
mee
tnet
ze
roe
nerg
ygo
als.
Allo
wfo
rea
sym
odel
ing
ofp
assi
veh
eatin
gan
dco
olin
gm
easu
res.
C
onsi
der
deve
lopi
ng
code
gui
delin
esfo
rpr
escr
iptiv
eap
proa
ches
to
ach
ieve
coo
ling
thro
ugh
alte
rnat
em
eans
.
ASH
RA
E90
.�-2
007
224
Net
zer
oEn
ergy
WSE
C�0
2.2.
�In
door
Des
ign
Tem
pera
ture
-7
0F
Hea
ting
78F
Coo
ling
Indo
ord
esig
nte
mpe
ratu
res
hall
be7
0ºF
fo
rhe
atin
gan
d78
deg
rees
Ffo
rco
olin
g.
Exce
ptio
n:O
ther
des
ign
tem
pera
ture
sm
ayb
eus
edfo
req
uipm
ents
elec
tion
ifit
resu
lts
ina
low
ere
nerg
yus
age.
Exce
ptio
ndo
esn’
tadd
ress
how
to
prov
elo
wer
ene
rgy
usag
e.T
his
pose
s po
ssib
le fi
nanc
ial b
urde
n fo
r sm
alle
r pr
ojec
ts a
nd a
ffor
dabl
e ho
usin
g pr
ojec
ts.
ASH
RA
E 55
-200
4 pr
ovid
ese
xpan
ded
com
fort
cri
teri
afo
rna
tura
llyv
entil
ated
spa
ces.
Cla
rify
wha
tis
requ
ired
to
“pr
ove”
low
eru
sage
(i.
e.c
ode
guid
eth
at
allo
ws
68fo
rhe
atin
gan
d80
for
cool
ing
resu
lts
inx
-y%
incr
ease
;or
6�
for
heat
ing
and
82fo
rco
olin
gre
sult
sin
x-y
%
incr
ease
).
ASH
RA
E��
-2
004
2�4
Net
zer
oEn
ergy
WSE
C�0
2.�
Exte
rior
D
esig
nC
ondi
tions
The
heat
ing
orc
oolin
gou
tdoo
rde
sign
te
mpe
ratu
res
shal
lbe
sele
cted
from
0.6
%
colu
mn
for
win
ter,
and
0.�
%c
olum
nfo
rsu
mm
erfr
omth
eP
uget
Sou
ndC
hapt
er
ofA
SHR
AE
publ
icat
ion
“Rec
omm
ende
dO
utdo
orD
esig
nTe
mpe
ratu
res,
W
ashi
ngto
nSt
ate,
ASH
RA
E.”
(See
als
oW
ashi
ngto
nSt
ate
Ener
gyC
ode
Man
ual.)
May
be
too
stri
ngen
t;c
onsi
der
�,2
,or
4%
dat
aw
ithe
xpan
ded
inte
rior
de
sign
con
ditio
ns.
Use
tabl
esin
cur
rent
co
de-
but
allo
w
refe
renc
eto
diff
eren
tco
lum
n.
N/A
244
Net
zer
oEn
ergy
WSE
C�0
2.�.
4.�
Insu
latio
nC
lear
ance
sW
here
req
uire
d,in
sula
tion
shal
lbe
inst
alle
dw
ithc
lear
ance
sac
cord
ing
to
man
ufac
ture
r’s
spec
ifica
tions
. In
sula
tion
shal
lbe
inst
alle
dso
that
req
uire
dcl
eara
nces
sha
llbe
mai
ntai
ned
thro
ugh
inst
alla
tion
ofa
per
man
entr
etai
ner.
Sim
ilar
toIB
Cis
sue.
Inth
is
clim
ate,
this
cod
ela
ngua
ged
oes
not a
llow
LB
C p
roje
cts
to m
axim
ize
insu
latio
nin
wal
land
roo
fcav
ities
,m
akin
g it
mor
e di
fficu
lt to
ach
ieve
ne
tzer
oen
ergy
.
See
reco
mm
enda
tions
un
der
IBC
�20
�.2
Bui
ldin
gSc
ienc
eC
orpo
ratio
nL
stib
urek
,Jos
eph,
U
nder
stan
ding
Att
ic
Vent
ilatio
n,B
SD-�
02,O
ctob
er
2006
.
2��
Mat
eria
ls
Red
Lis
tW
SEC
�02.
�.6.
2Fl
oors
:Vap
or
reta
rder
sFl
oors
sep
arat
ing
cond
ition
ing
spac
efr
om
unco
nditi
oned
spa
ces
hall
have
av
apor
re
tard
erin
stal
led.
The
vap
orr
etar
der
shal
lhav
ea
one
perm
dry
cup
rat
ing
orle
ss(i
.e.f
our
mil
[0.0
04in
chth
ick]
po
lyet
hyle
neo
rK
raft
face
dm
ater
ial).
Con
vent
iona
lmat
eria
lsc
onta
in
toxi
nso
nth
eLB
Cm
ater
ials
Red
Li
st.A
lter
nativ
epr
oduc
tsc
arry
a
cost
pre
miu
m.
Con
side
rva
por
barr
ier
pain
t.C
reat
ea
code
gu
ide
that
follo
ws
prac
tices
inL
stib
urek
’s
book
.
Bui
ldin
gSc
ienc
eC
orpo
ratio
nL
stib
urek
,Jos
eph,
Vap
or
Bar
rier
san
dW
allD
esig
n,
Res
earc
hR
epor
t-0
4�0
Nov
embe
r-20
04.
26�
Mat
eria
ls
Red
Lis
tW
SEC
�02.
�.6.
6W
alls
:Va
por
reta
rder
sW
alls
sep
arat
ing
cond
ition
eds
pace
from
un
cond
ition
eds
pace
sha
llha
vea
vap
or
reta
rder
inst
alle
d.F
aced
bat
tins
ulat
ion
shal
lbe
face
sta
pled
.Ex
cept
ion:
For
C
limat
eZo
ne�
,woo
dfr
amed
wal
lsw
ith
am
inim
umo
fnom
inal
R-�
con
tinuo
us
insu
late
dsh
eath
ing
inst
alle
dou
tsid
eof
th
efr
amin
gan
dst
ruct
ural
she
athi
ng.F
or
Clim
ate
Zone
2,w
ood
fram
edw
alls
with
a
min
imum
ofn
omin
alR
-7.�
con
tinuo
us
insu
late
dsh
eath
ing
inte
rior
cav
ity
insu
latio
nfo
rth
ise
xcep
tion
shal
lbe
am
axim
umo
fnom
inal
R-2
�.
Con
vent
iona
lmat
eria
lsc
onta
in
toxi
nso
nth
eLB
Cm
ater
ials
Red
Li
st.A
lter
nativ
epr
oduc
tsc
arry
a
cost
pre
miu
m.
Cre
ate
aco
deg
uide
th
atfo
llow
spr
actic
esin
Ls
tibur
ek’s
boo
k.
ww
w.b
uild
ings
cien
ce.c
om
Lst
ibur
ek,J
osep
h,V
apor
B
arri
ers
and
Wal
lDes
ign,
R
esea
rch
Rep
ort-
04�
0,
Nov
embe
r20
04.
Lstib
urek
,Jos
eph,
Air
B
arri
ers
vs.V
apor
Bar
rier
s,
Res
earc
hR
epor
t-0
004,
200
0.
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: 29CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009a
pp
end
ix a
: fu
ll l
ist o
f sug
gest
ed s
trat
egie
s fo
r R
emov
ing
Code
& R
egul
ator
y B
arri
ers
(con
tinue
d)
RC
W:R
evis
edC
ode
ofW
ashi
ngto
nV
MC
:Van
couv
erM
unic
ipal
Cod
eC
CC
:Cla
rkC
ount
yC
ode
IB
C:In
tern
atio
nalB
uild
ing
Cod
eI
MC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lMec
hani
calC
ode
IFC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lFir
eC
ode
UP
C:
Uni
form
Plu
mbi
ngC
ode
WES
C:W
AS
tate
Ene
rgy
Cod
e
#LB
CP
rere
q.
Aff
ecte
dC
ode
Cod
eSe
ctio
nD
escr
iptio
nC
ode
Lang
uage
Pro
ject
Con
cern
Pro
pose
dR
ecom
men
datio
nR
efer
ence
/R
esou
rces
274
Net
zer
oEn
ergy
WSE
C�0
2.�.
4.8
Slab
on
Gra
de
insu
latio
nSl
ab-o
n-gr
ade
insu
latio
n,in
stal
led
insi
deth
efo
unda
tion
wal
l,sh
alle
xten
ddo
wnw
ard
from
the
top
ofth
esl
abfo
ra
min
imum
dis
tanc
eof
24
inch
eso
rdo
wnw
ard
and
then
hor
izon
tally
ben
eath
th
esl
abfo
ra
min
imum
of2
4in
ches
.In
sula
tion
inst
alle
dou
tsid
eth
efo
unda
tion
shal
lext
end
dow
nwar
dto
am
inim
umo
f24
inch
eso
rto
the
fros
tlin
e.A
bove
gra
de
insu
latio
nsh
allb
epr
otec
ted.
Exc
eptio
n:
For
mon
olith
ics
labs
,the
insu
latio
nsh
all
exte
ndd
ownw
ard
from
the
top
ofth
esl
ab
toth
ebo
ttom
oft
hefo
otin
g.
Whe
rein
sula
tion
islo
cate
din
side
th
efo
unda
tion
wal
l,th
eco
nnec
tion
betw
een
the
foun
datio
nan
dsl
abis
no
tadd
ress
ed.
Pro
vide
dra
win
gto
en
cour
age
cont
inuo
us
ther
mal
bre
akth
at
isa
ccep
tabl
eas
an
alte
rnat
em
eans
and
m
etho
ds.
OR
RC
Tab
le4
0�.�
Min
imum
In
sula
tion
requ
irem
ents
for
Fros
tPro
tect
edfo
otin
gsin
H
eate
dB
uild
ings
. O
RSS
CC
hapt
er�
�Se
ctio
n��
�2.�
.2.4
. O
rego
nR
esid
entia
lcod
edo
es
notc
onsi
der
slab
hea
tlos
sa
fact
orfo
rbu
ildin
gsb
elow
2,
000
Air
Fre
ezin
gD
egre
e-D
ays.
28�
Mat
eria
ls
Red
Lis
tW
SEC
�02.
�.6.
7
��
��.�
Gro
und
cove
rof
bla
ck
poly
ethy
lene
Ag
roun
dco
ver
of0
.006
inch
thic
kbl
ack
poly
ethy
lene
or
appr
oved
equ
als
hall
be
laid
ove
rth
egr
ound
with
inc
raw
lspa
ces.
Th
egr
ound
cov
ers
hall
beo
verl
appe
d�2
in
ches
min
imum
at t
he jo
ints
and
sha
ll ex
tend
toth
efo
unda
tion
wal
l.Ex
cept
ion:
Th
egr
ound
cov
erm
ayb
eom
itted
inc
raw
lsp
aces
ifth
ecr
awls
pace
has
ac
oncr
ete
slab
floo
r w
ith a
min
imum
thic
knes
s of
3
�/2
inch
es.
Con
vent
iona
lgro
und
cove
rm
ater
ials
con
tain
toxi
nso
nth
eLB
Cm
ater
ials
red
list
.Alt
erna
tive
prod
ucts
car
rya
cos
tpre
miu
m.
Use
con
cret
esl
ab
exce
ptio
nor
des
ign
craw
lspa
cew
ithr
adon
m
itiga
tion
stra
tegy
.
Bui
ldin
gSc
ienc
eC
orpo
ratio
nL
stib
urek
,Jos
eph,
Vap
or
Bar
rier
san
dW
allD
esig
n,
Res
earc
hR
epor
t-0
4�0
Nov
embe
r-20
04.
294
Net
zer
oEn
ergy
Indo
or
Air
Q
ualit
y
�02.
�.2
Vent
ilatio
nA
llcr
awls
pace
ssh
allb
eve
ntila
ted
as
spec
ified
in 1
203.
3 of
the
Inte
rnat
iona
l B
uild
ing
Cod
e.
This
req
uire
men
tin
the
IBC
add
sex
tra
outs
ide
air
and
pote
ntia
len
ergy
loss
,and
doe
sno
tacc
ount
fo
rhe
ated
cra
wls
pace
s.
Cre
ate
aco
deg
uide
th
atfo
llow
spr
actic
esin
Ls
tibur
ek’s
boo
k.
ww
w.b
uild
ings
cien
ce.c
om
Lstib
urek
,Jos
eph
W.,
Insi
ght
New
Lig
htin
Cra
wls
pace
s,
BSI
-009
.
�04
Net
zer
oEn
ergy
WSE
C�0
�.�
Out
door
Li
ghtin
gLu
min
aire
spr
ovid
ing
outd
oor
light
ing
and
perm
anen
tly
mou
nted
toa
res
iden
tial
build
ing
orto
oth
erb
uild
ings
on
the
sam
elo
t sha
ll be
hig
h ef
ficac
y lu
min
aire
s.
Defi
nitio
n do
es a
llow
for
new
te
chno
logy
like
LED
sun
less
it
isp
uto
na
mot
ion
sens
or-
LED
sno
tcur
rent
lyc
ondu
cive
toa
m
otio
nse
nsor
.Cod
eco
uld
iden
tify
max
imum
wat
tage
as
oppo
sed
to
fixtu
re ty
pe.
Red
efine
Hig
h Ef
ficie
ncy
lum
inar
ies
toin
clud
ene
wte
chno
logi
esli
ke
LED
.
Illum
inat
ion
Engi
neer
ing
Soci
ety
Gui
delin
es
����
Wat
er
Dis
char
geU
PC
�0�.
�Se
wer
sR
equi
red
-ev
ery
build
ing
mus
thav
ea
conn
ectio
nto
ap
ublic
se
wer
Ever
y bu
ildin
g in
whi
ch p
lum
bing
fixt
ures
ar
ein
stal
led
shal
lhav
ea
conn
ectio
nto
a
publ
ico
rpr
ivat
ese
wer
exc
epta
spr
ovid
ed
inS
ectio
n�0
�.2.
Onl
y ex
cept
ion
is fo
r pr
ojec
ts
with
outs
ewer
ava
ilabl
efo
rus
e.C
onsi
der
exce
ptio
nsfo
rpr
ojec
ts w
hich
inst
all
mem
bran
ebi
orea
ctor
san
dot
her
onsi
teo
rne
ighb
orho
od-l
evel
se
wag
etr
eatm
ent
syst
ems
that
add
ress
pu
blic
hea
lth
conc
erns
.
OP
SC7
��.�
,7��
.2,7
��.4
Ex
cept
ions
are
pro
vide
dif
apu
blic
sew
eris
not
ava
ilabl
e.
�2�
Mat
eria
ls
Red
Lis
tU
PC
���.
8Sc
rew
ed
fittin
gs
optio
nsd
ono
tin
clud
egr
een
mat
eria
ls
Scre
wed
fitt
ings
sha
ll be
AB
S, c
ast i
ron,
co
pper
allo
y,m
alle
able
iron
,PVC
,ste
el,o
rot
her
appr
oved
mat
eria
ls.T
hrea
dss
hall
beta
pped
out
ofs
olid
met
alo
rm
olde
din
so
lidA
BS
orP
VC.
Som
ene
wer
mat
eria
lsa
rem
ore
envi
ronm
enta
llys
ensi
tive
choi
ces
(PEX
).B
urde
nof
pro
ofis
on
the
desi
gnte
amto
pro
vide
alt
erna
tives
th
ata
rea
ccep
tabl
eby
cod
e.
Pus
hin
dust
ryto
dev
elop
ne
wp
rodu
cts
that
pr
ovid
e fit
tings
in n
ew
mat
eria
lso
rus
eco
pper
/A
BS.
N/A
�0 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009R
CW
:Rev
ised
Cod
eof
Was
hing
ton
VM
C:V
anco
uver
Mun
icip
alC
ode
CC
C:C
lark
Cou
nty
Cod
eI
BC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lBui
ldin
gC
ode
IM
C:In
tern
atio
nalM
echa
nica
lCod
eI
FC:In
tern
atio
nalF
ire
Cod
eU
PC
:U
nifo
rmP
lum
bing
Cod
eW
ESC
:WA
Sta
teE
nerg
yC
ode
#LB
CP
rere
q.
Aff
ecte
dC
ode
Cod
eSe
ctio
nD
escr
iptio
nC
ode
Lang
uage
Pro
ject
Con
cern
Pro
pose
dR
ecom
men
datio
nR
efer
ence
/R
esou
rces
���0
Net
zer
oW
ater
UP
C40
�.2
Uri
nals
tha
tdo
n’th
ave
aw
ash
ate
ach
disc
harg
ear
epr
ohib
ited
Pro
hibi
ted
Uri
nals
:Flo
or-t
ype
and
wal
l-hu
ngty
petr
ough
uri
nals
sha
llbe
pr
ohib
ited.
Uri
nals
that
hav
ein
visi
ble
seal
or
that
hav
eu
nven
tilat
eds
pace
or
wal
lth
atis
not
thor
ough
lyw
ashe
dat
eac
hdi
scha
rge
shal
lbp
rohi
bite
d.
Exem
ptio
n fo
r w
ater
less
fixt
ures
is
not w
ell d
efine
d.
Ref
erto
Ore
gon
Plu
mbi
ngC
ode
exem
pt
lang
uage
inC
hapt
er4
.
OP
SC 4
02.3
.1 d
efine
s N
onw
ater
Uri
nals
whi
cha
re
dist
inct
and
sep
arat
efr
om
Uri
nals
as
defin
ed in
402
.3.
Th
eref
ore,
was
hat
eac
hdi
scha
rge
(40�
.2)a
ppea
rs
toa
pply
toU
rina
lsa
ndn
ot
Non
wat
erU
rina
ls.
Cod
eal
soin
clud
esn
on
bind
ing
note
that
wat
erle
ss
urin
als
mus
tbe
kept
cle
an.
�4�0
Net
zer
oW
ater
UP
C40
2.�
409
Wat
ers
uppl
yto
Uri
nal
Ever
yw
ater
sup
ply
toa
uri
nals
hall
be
prot
ecte
dby
an
appr
oved
-typ
eva
cuum
br
eake
r or
oth
er a
ppro
ved
back
flow
pr
even
tion
devi
cea
sde
scri
bed
inS
ectio
n60
�.�.
For
wat
erle
ssu
rina
ls,e
xtra
cos
tfo
rre
dund
ants
yste
m.
Pro
mot
ein
stal
latio
nof
lo
ww
ater
uri
nals
inst
ead
ofw
ater
less
uri
nals
.
N/A
���0
Net
zer
oW
ater
UP
C60
�R
unni
ng
Wat
er
Req
uire
d
Exce
ptw
here
not
dee
med
nec
essa
ry
for
safe
tyo
rsa
nita
tion
byth
eA
utho
rity
H
avin
g Ju
risd
ictio
n, e
ach
plum
bing
fixt
ure
shal
lbe
prov
ided
with
an
adeq
uate
sup
ply
ofp
otab
ler
unni
ngw
ater
pip
edth
eret
oin
an
app
rove
dm
anne
r,s
oar
rang
eda
sto
flu
sh a
nd k
eep
it in
a c
lean
and
san
itary
co
nditi
on w
ithou
t dan
ger
of b
ackfl
ow
orc
ross
-con
nect
ion.
Wat
erc
lose
tsa
nd
urin
als
shal
l be
flush
ed b
y m
eans
of a
n ap
prov
ed fl
ush
tank
or
flush
omet
er v
alve
. In
juri
sdic
tions
that
ado
pt C
hapt
er 1
6,
wat
erc
lose
ts,u
rina
ls,a
ndtr
app
rim
ers
ind
esig
nate
dno
n-re
side
ntia
lbui
ldin
gs
may
be
prov
ided
with
rec
laim
edw
ater
as
defin
ed a
nd r
egul
ated
by
Cha
pter
16
of
this
cod
e. E
xcep
tion:
Lis
ted
fixtu
res
that
do
not
req
uire
wat
erfo
rth
eir
oper
atio
nan
dar
eno
tcon
nect
edto
the
wat
ers
uppl
y.
Req
uiri
ngp
otab
lew
ater
sup
ply
to a
ll fix
ture
s un
derm
ines
abi
lity
of a
LB
C p
roje
ct to
use
har
vest
ed
rain
wat
ero
rre
clai
med
gre
ywat
er
for
toile
t flus
hing
to m
eet z
ero
wat
erg
oals
.Dua
lpip
ing
may
be
nec
essa
ryw
hich
pro
vide
sa
finan
cial
bar
rier
for
affo
rdab
le
hous
ing
proj
ects
.
Allo
wr
ainw
ater
tob
eus
eda
spo
tabl
eso
urce
w
ithp
rope
rsi
gnag
ean
dco
nstr
uctio
nas
now
al
low
edu
nder
the
Stat
eof
Ore
gon
Alt
erna
te
Met
hods
rul
ing
OP
SC
08-0
�.
Allo
wg
rey
wat
erto
be
used
to fl
ush
toile
ts
with
pro
per
sign
age
and
requ
ire
sim
ilar
cons
truc
tion
toc
urre
ntly
pa
ssed
usi
ngth
eO
rego
nSt
ate
Alt
erna
teM
etho
ds.
OP
SC2
008,
App
endi
xM
-R
ainw
ater
H
arve
stin
gSy
stem
s.
Kin
gC
ount
yR
ainw
ater
H
arve
stin
gG
uide
lines
:ht
tp:/
/ww
w.k
ingc
ount
y.go
v/he
alth
serv
ices
/hea
lth/
ehs/
plum
bing
/~/m
edia
/hea
lth/
publ
iche
alth
/doc
umen
ts/
plum
bing
/Rai
nwat
er_
Har
vest
ing.
ashx
�6�0
Net
zer
oW
ater
UP
C6�
0.�
Size
of
Pot
able
Wat
er
Pip
ing
The
size
ofe
ach
wat
erm
eter
and
eac
hpo
tabl
ew
ater
sup
ply
pipe
from
the
met
ero
rot
her
sour
ceo
fsup
ply
toth
efix
ture
sup
ply
bran
ches
, ris
ers,
fixt
ures
, co
nnec
tions
,out
lets
,or
othe
rus
ess
hall
beb
ased
on
the
tota
ldem
and
and
shal
lbe
det
erm
ined
acc
ordi
ngto
the
met
hods
an
dpr
oced
ures
out
lined
inth
iss
ectio
n.
Wat
erp
ipin
gsy
stem
ssh
allb
ede
sign
ed
toe
nsur
eth
atth
em
axim
umv
eloc
ities
al
low
edb
yth
eco
dea
ndth
eap
plic
able
st
anda
rda
ren
ote
xcee
ded.
Wat
ers
izin
gre
gula
tions
bas
edo
nol
der
fixtu
res
- re
sult
ing
in w
ater
lo
sses
.
Stan
dard
siz
esfo
rpi
pes
and
fittin
gs s
tart
at 1
/2”
diam
eter
.A
nyth
ing
smal
ler
iss
peci
alo
rder
or
not
man
ufac
ture
d.
OP
SC=-
Cha
pter
6:R
evie
w
tabl
es6
-�,6
-6
ap
pen
dix
a:
full
lis
t of s
ugge
sted
str
ateg
ies
for
Rem
ovin
g Co
de &
Reg
ulat
ory
Bar
rier
s (c
ontin
ued)
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: ��CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
RC
W:R
evis
edC
ode
ofW
ashi
ngto
nV
MC
:Van
couv
erM
unic
ipal
Cod
eC
CC
:Cla
rkC
ount
yC
ode
IB
C:In
tern
atio
nalB
uild
ing
Cod
eI
MC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lMec
hani
calC
ode
IFC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lFir
eC
ode
UP
C:
Uni
form
Plu
mbi
ngC
ode
WES
C:W
AS
tate
Ene
rgy
Cod
e
#LB
CP
rere
q.
Aff
ecte
dC
ode
Cod
eSe
ctio
nD
escr
iptio
nC
ode
Lang
uage
Pro
ject
Con
cern
Pro
pose
dR
ecom
men
datio
nR
efer
ence
/R
esou
rces
�7��
Wat
er
Dis
char
geU
PC
��0�
.�St
orm
D
rain
age
-co
der
equi
res
stor
m
drai
nage
sy
stem
All
roof
s,p
aved
are
as,y
ards
,cou
rts,
an
dco
urty
ards
sha
llbe
dra
ined
into
a
sepa
rate
sto
rms
ewer
sys
tem
,or
into
a
com
bine
dse
wer
sys
tem
whe
rea
sep
arat
est
orm
sys
tem
isn
ota
vaila
ble,
or
tos
ome
othe
rpl
ace
ofd
ispo
sals
atis
fact
ory
toth
eA
utho
rity
Hav
ing
Juri
sdic
tion
(AH
J).
In
case
ofo
ne-
and
two-
fam
ilyd
wel
lings
,st
orm
wat
er m
ay b
e di
scha
rged
on
flat
area
ssu
cha
sst
reet
sor
law
nss
olo
nga
sth
e st
orm
wat
er s
hall
flow
aw
ay fr
om th
e bu
ildin
g an
d aw
ay fr
om a
djoi
ning
pro
pert
y,
and
shal
lnot
cre
ate
anu
isan
ce.
Stan
dard
req
uire
sA
HJ
to
inde
pend
ente
valu
ate
-ra
ther
than
pr
ovid
ing
stan
dard
s. L
BC
pro
ject
s m
anag
est
orm
wat
ero
nsite
whe
re
feas
ible
so
conn
ectio
nto
sto
rm
sew
erw
ould
req
uire
an
appe
al.
Pro
vide
cod
egu
idan
ce
onp
refe
rred
ons
ite
stor
mw
ater
man
agem
ent
prac
tices
.
Por
tlan
dSt
orm
wat
er
Man
agem
entM
anua
l,C
hapt
er
�,S
ectio
n�.
�St
orm
wat
er
Man
agem
entR
equi
rem
ents
L
owIm
pact
D
evel
opm
entT
echn
ical
G
uida
nce
Man
ual,
Pug
et
Soun
dA
ctio
nTe
am:h
ttp:
//w
ww
.psp
.wa.
gov/
dow
nloa
ds/
LID
/LID
_man
ual2
00�.
�8�0
Net
zer
oW
ater
��W
ater
D
isch
arge
UP
C�6
02G
ray
Wat
er
defin
ition
Gra
yw
ater
isu
ntre
ated
hou
seho
ld
was
tew
ater
that
has
not
com
ein
toc
onta
ct
with
toile
twas
te.G
ray
wat
erin
clud
es
used
wat
erfr
omb
atht
ubs,
sho
wer
s,a
nd
bath
room
was
hba
sins
,and
wat
erfr
om
clot
hes
was
hers
and
laun
dry
tubs
.Its
hall
noti
nclu
dew
aste
wat
erfr
omk
itche
nsi
nks
ord
ishw
ashe
rs.
Defi
nitio
n do
esn’
t inc
lude
w
aste
wat
erfr
omm
echa
nica
lsy
stem
sor
oth
erc
omm
erci
alu
ses.
Rev
ise
defin
ition
thro
ugh
proc
ess
invo
lvin
gst
akeh
olde
rs.
Sepa
rate
defi
nitio
ns o
f co
nden
sate
wat
era
nd
chill
erp
roce
ssw
ater
.
Ludw
ig,A
rt,T
heN
ewC
reat
ean
Oas
isw
ithG
reyw
ater
-
Cho
osin
g,B
uild
ing
and
Usi
ngG
reyw
ater
Sys
tem
s—
Incl
udes
Bra
nche
dD
rain
s
Rev
ised
and
Exp
ande
d�t
hEd
ition
Lu
dwig
,Art
.Bui
ldin
gP
rofe
ssio
nal’s
Gra
ywat
er
Gui
de.O
asis
Des
ign
�
San
Mar
con
Trou
tClu
b
Sant
aB
arba
ra,C
A9
��0�
-97
26.
Ag
uide
top
rofe
ssio
nal
inst
alla
tion
ofg
rayw
ater
sy
stem
s.
ww
w.o
asis
desi
gn.n
et/
grey
wat
er/m
isin
fo/i
ndex
.htm
ap
pen
dix
a:
full
lis
t of s
ugge
sted
str
ateg
ies
for
Rem
ovin
g Co
de &
Reg
ulat
ory
Bar
rier
s (c
ontin
ued)
�2 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
ap
pen
dix
a:
full
lis
t of s
ugge
sted
str
ateg
ies
for
Rem
ovin
g Co
de &
Reg
ulat
ory
Bar
rier
s (c
ontin
ued)
RC
W:R
evis
edC
ode
ofW
ashi
ngto
nV
MC
:Van
couv
erM
unic
ipal
Cod
eC
CC
:Cla
rkC
ount
yC
ode
IB
C:In
tern
atio
nalB
uild
ing
Cod
eI
MC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lMec
hani
calC
ode
IFC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lFir
eC
ode
UP
C:
Uni
form
Plu
mbi
ngC
ode
WES
C:W
AS
tate
Ene
rgy
Cod
e
#LB
CP
rere
q.
Aff
ecte
dC
ode
Cod
eSe
ctio
nD
escr
iptio
nC
ode
Lang
uage
Pro
ject
Con
cern
Pro
pose
dR
ecom
men
datio
nR
efer
ence
/R
esou
rces
�9�0
Net
zer
oW
ater
��W
ater
D
isch
arge
UP
C;
DO
H
RS&
G
Sect
ion
B–
Gre
yW
ater
Sy
stem
s
�606
Pro
cedu
refo
rEs
timat
ing
Gra
yW
ater
D
isch
arge
;D
epar
tmen
tof
Hea
lth
Wat
er
Con
serv
ing
On-
Site
W
aste
wat
er
Trea
tmen
tSy
stem
s
(A)T
hen
umbe
rof
occ
upan
tso
feac
hdw
ellin
gun
itsh
allb
eca
lcul
ated
as
follo
ws:
Fir
stb
edro
om=
2;E
ach
addi
tiona
lbe
droo
m=
�.
(B)T
hee
stim
ated
gra
yw
ater
flow
s fo
r ea
ch o
ccup
ant s
hall
be
calc
ulat
eda
sfo
llow
s:S
how
ers,
bat
htub
san
dw
ashb
asin
s=
2�G
PD
(9�L
PD
);La
undr
y=
��G
PD
(�7
LPD
).(C
)The
tota
lnu
mbe
rof
occ
upan
tss
hall
bem
ultip
lied
byth
eap
plic
able
est
imat
edg
ray
wat
er
disc
harg
eas
pro
vide
dab
ove,
and
the
type
of fi
xtur
es c
onne
cted
to th
e gr
ay
wat
ers
yste
m.
Exam
ple
�:S
ingl
e-fa
mily
dw
ellin
g;th
ree
bedr
oom
sw
iths
how
ers,
ba
thtu
bs,w
ashb
asin
s,a
ndla
undr
yfa
cilit
ies
allc
onne
cted
toth
egr
ayw
ater
sy
stem
:Tot
aln
umbe
rof
occ
upan
ts=
2
+ 1
+1 =
4; E
stim
ated
gra
y w
ater
flow
= 4
x
(2�
+��
)=�
60G
PD
,met
ric
=4
x(9
�+
�7)=
608
LP
D.
Exam
ple
2:S
ingl
e-fa
mily
dw
ellin
g;fo
urb
edro
oms
with
onl
yth
ecl
othe
sw
ashe
rco
nnec
ted
toth
egr
ay
wat
ers
yste
m:T
otal
num
ber
ofo
ccup
ants
=
2+
�+�
+�
=�;
Est
imat
edg
ray
wat
er
flow
= 5
x 1
5 =
75 G
PD
, met
ric
= 5
x 57
=
28�
LPD
.
Ove
rest
imat
esg
ray
wat
erb
ya
fact
oro
f4,r
equi
ring
mor
ear
ea
requ
ired
for
subs
urfa
ced
rip
irri
gatio
nsy
stem
s.C
alcu
latio
ns
shou
ld u
se m
ore
effic
ient
fixt
ure
perf
orm
ance
.
Rev
ise
num
bers
for
new
pro
ject
s w
ith w
ater
co
nser
ving
fixt
ures
.
See
reso
urce
abo
vefo
rO
asis
G
ray
Wat
erM
anua
l.
40�0
Net
zer
oW
ater
UP
C�6
�4D
efini
tions
Rec
laim
edw
ater
isw
ater
that
,as
are
sult
oft
ertia
rytr
eatm
ento
fdom
estic
w
aste
wat
erb
ya
publ
ica
genc
y,is
sui
tabl
efo
r a
dire
ct b
enefi
cial
use
or
a co
ntro
lled
use
that
wou
ldn
oto
ther
wis
eoc
cur.
The
leve
loft
reat
men
tand
qua
lity
of
the
recl
aim
edw
ater
sha
llbe
app
rove
dby
the
publ
ich
ealt
hA
utho
rity
Hav
ing
Juri
sdic
tion.
For
the
purp
ose
ofth
is
chap
ter,
tert
iary
trea
tmen
tsha
llre
sult
in
wat
er th
at is
ade
quat
ely
oxid
ized
, cla
rifie
d,
coag
ulat
ed, fi
lter
ed, a
nd d
isin
fect
ed s
o th
ata
tsom
elo
catio
nin
the
trea
tmen
tpr
oces
s,th
ese
ven
(7)d
aym
edia
nnu
mbe
rof
tota
lcol
iform
bac
teri
ain
dai
lys
ampl
es
does
not
exc
eed
two
and
two-
tent
hs(2
.2)
per
one
hund
red
(�00
)mill
ilite
rs,a
ndth
enu
mbe
rof
tota
lcol
iform
bac
teri
ado
esn
ot
exce
edtw
enty
-thr
ee(2
�)p
ero
neh
undr
ed
(�00
)mill
ilite
rsin
any
sam
ple.
The
wat
er
shal
l be
filte
red
so th
at th
e da
ily a
vera
ge
turb
idity
doe
sno
texc
eed
two
(2)t
urbi
dity
un
itsu
pstr
eam
from
the
disi
nfec
tion
proc
ess.
Spe
cific
ally
exc
lude
d fr
om th
is
defin
ition
is g
ray
wat
er, w
hich
is d
efine
d in
P
art�
oft
his
chap
ter.
Exce
ptio
ndo
esn
ota
llow
gra
yw
ater
,whi
chm
ayb
ene
cess
ary
to
achi
eve
netz
ero
wat
er.
Rev
ise
defin
ition
. Se
ere
sour
cea
bove
for
Oas
is
Gra
yW
ater
Man
ual.
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: ��CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009a
pp
end
ix a
: fu
ll l
ist o
f sug
gest
ed s
trat
egie
s fo
r R
emov
ing
Code
& R
egul
ator
y B
arri
ers
(con
tinue
d)
RC
W:R
evis
edC
ode
ofW
ashi
ngto
nV
MC
:Van
couv
erM
unic
ipal
Cod
eC
CC
:Cla
rkC
ount
yC
ode
IB
C:In
tern
atio
nalB
uild
ing
Cod
eI
MC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lMec
hani
calC
ode
IFC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lFir
eC
ode
UP
C:
Uni
form
Plu
mbi
ngC
ode
WES
C:W
AS
tate
Ene
rgy
Cod
e
#LB
CP
rere
q.
Aff
ecte
dC
ode
Cod
eSe
ctio
nD
escr
iptio
nC
ode
Lang
uage
Pro
ject
Con
cern
Pro
pose
dR
ecom
men
datio
nR
efer
ence
/R
esou
rces
4��
Mat
eria
ls
Red
list
UP
C�6
�7P
ipe
Mat
eria
l-
Rec
laim
ed
wat
erp
ipe
mar
ked
byta
pe
fabr
icat
ed
with
pol
yvi
nyl
chlo
ride
Rec
laim
ed w
ater
pip
ing
and
fittin
gs
shal
lbe
asr
equi
red
inth
isc
ode
for
pota
ble
wat
er p
ipin
g an
d fit
tings
. All
recl
aim
ed w
ater
pip
e an
d fit
tings
sha
ll be
co
ntin
uous
lyw
rapp
edw
ithp
urpl
e-co
lore
dM
ylar
.The
wra
ppin
gta
pes
hall
have
a
min
imum
nom
inal
thic
knes
s of
five
ten-
thou
sand
ths
(0.0
00�)
inch
and
am
inim
um
wid
tho
f2in
ches
.Tap
esh
allb
efa
bric
ated
of
pol
y(vi
nylc
hlor
ide)
with
as
ynth
etic
ru
bber
adh
esiv
ean
da
clea
rpo
lypr
opyl
ene
prot
ectiv
eco
atin
gor
app
rove
deq
ual.
The
tape
sha
llbe
pur
ple
(Pan
tone
col
or#
��2)
an
dsh
allb
eim
prin
ted
inn
omin
al�
/2in
ch
high
,bla
cku
pper
case
lett
ers,
with
the
wor
ds,“
CA
UTI
ON
:REC
LAIM
EDW
ATER
,D
ON
OT
DR
INK
.”T
hele
tter
ing
shal
lbe
impr
inte
din
two
para
llell
ines
,suc
hth
at
afte
rw
rapp
ing
the
pipe
with
a�
/2w
idth
ov
erla
p,o
nefu
lllin
eof
text
sha
llbe
vi
sibl
e.W
rapp
ing
tape
isn
otr
equi
red
for
buri
edP
VCp
ipe
man
ufac
ture
dw
ithp
urpl
eco
lor
inte
gral
toth
epl
astic
and
mar
ked
ono
ppos
ites
ides
tor
ead,
“C
AU
TIO
N:
REC
LAIM
EDW
ATER
,DO
NO
TD
RIN
K”
inin
terv
als
nott
oex
ceed
thre
efe
et.
All
valv
es, e
xcep
t fixt
ure
supp
ly c
ontr
ol
valv
ess
hall
bee
quip
ped
with
alo
ckin
gfe
atur
e.A
llm
echa
nica
lequ
ipm
entt
hat
isa
ppur
tena
ntto
the
recl
aim
edw
ater
sy
stem
sha
llbe
pai
nted
tom
atch
the
Myl
arw
rapp
ing
tape
.
Cod
e de
finiti
on o
f mar
king
ta
pev
iola
tes
mat
eria
lsr
edlis
tpr
ereq
uisi
te. E
xpan
d de
finiti
on
ofw
hatt
ypes
ofm
ater
ials
can
be
used
for
mar
king
.
Use
inte
gral
col
orp
ipe.
For
Wat
er:
Duc
tile
iron
,HD
PE,
C
oncr
ete,
Cop
per,
PEX
Fo
rSe
wer
:C
oncr
ete,
HD
PE
For
Dra
in,W
aste
and
Ve
nts
(DW
V):
Cas
tIro
n,C
oppe
r,A
BS,
P
EX
Har
vie,
Jam
iew
ithL
ent,
Tom
,P
VC-F
ree
Pip
eP
urch
aser
s’
Rep
ort,
Hea
lthy
Bui
ldin
gN
etw
ork,
dra
ft�
�/0�
/02.
42��
Wat
er
Dis
char
geU
PC
��0�
.�.6
Subs
oild
rain
s-
mus
tbe
�0’
from
pro
pert
ylin
e
Not
hing
inS
ectio
n��
0�.�
sha
llpr
even
tdr
ains
that
ser
vee
ither
sub
soil
drai
ns
ora
reaw
ays
ofa
det
ache
dbu
ildin
gfr
omd
isch
argi
ngto
ap
rope
rly
grad
ed
open
are
a,p
rovi
ded
that
:�.T
hey
don
ot
serv
e co
ntin
uous
ly fl
owin
g sp
ring
s or
gr
ound
wat
er;
2.T
hep
oint
ofd
isch
arge
is
atle
ast�
0fe
etfr
oma
nyp
rope
rty
line;
and
�.
Itis
impr
actic
able
tod
isch
arge
suc
hdr
ains
toa
sto
rmd
rain
,to
ana
ppro
ved
wat
erc
ours
e,to
the
fron
tstr
eetc
urb
or
gutt
er,o
rto
an
alle
y.
LBC
pro
ject
s at
tem
pt to
man
age
allw
ater
on
site
.Ade
quat
esi
te
area
req
uire
dto
man
age
alls
torm
dr
aina
ge.
Allo
wfo
rva
rian
ces
in
prop
erty
line
set
back
re
quir
emen
ts fo
r pr
ojec
ts
that
dem
onst
rate
ad
equa
teo
nsite
st
orm
wat
erm
anag
emen
tth
roug
hlo
wim
pact
de
velo
pmen
tstr
ateg
ies.
N/A
4���
Wat
er
Dis
char
geU
PC
�60�
.AG
ray
Wat
er
allo
wed
for
sing
lefa
mily
on
lyfo
run
derg
roun
dla
ndsc
ape
irri
gatio
n
The
prov
isio
nso
fthi
sch
apte
rsh
alla
pply
to
the
cons
truc
tion,
alt
erat
ion,
and
rep
air
ofg
ray
wat
ers
yste
ms
for
unde
rgro
und
land
scap
eir
riga
tion.
Inst
alla
tions
sha
llbe
al
low
edo
nly
ins
ingl
e-fa
mily
dw
ellin
gs.
The
syst
ems
hall
have
no
conn
ectio
nto
an
ypo
tabl
ew
ater
sys
tem
and
not
res
ult
ina
nys
urfa
cing
oft
heg
ray
wat
er.
Exce
pt
othe
rwis
epr
ovid
edfo
rin
this
cha
pter
,the
pr
ovis
ions
oft
his
code
sha
llbe
app
licab
le
tog
ray
wat
erin
stal
latio
n.
Cod
edo
esn
ota
llow
gre
ywat
er
subs
urfa
ced
rip
irri
gatio
nsy
stem
sfo
rm
ultif
amily
bui
ldin
gs.
Con
side
ral
low
ing
grey
wat
eru
sage
in
mul
tifam
ily
deve
lopm
ents
.Con
side
rad
optin
gor
dina
nce
sim
ilar
toth
eSt
ate
of
Ore
gon
Alt
erna
tem
eans
an
dm
etho
ds.
Ore
gon
Smar
tGui
de:W
ater
C
onse
rvat
ion
Syst
ems.
ww
w.
cbs.
stat
e.or
.us/
exte
rnal
/bcd
/pd
f/09
90.p
df
�4 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
ap
pen
dix
a:
full
lis
t of s
ugge
sted
str
ateg
ies
for
Rem
ovin
g Co
de &
Reg
ulat
ory
Bar
rier
s (c
ontin
ued)
RC
W:R
evis
edC
ode
ofW
ashi
ngto
nV
MC
:Van
couv
erM
unic
ipal
Cod
eC
CC
:Cla
rkC
ount
yC
ode
IB
C:In
tern
atio
nalB
uild
ing
Cod
eI
MC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lMec
hani
calC
ode
IFC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lFir
eC
ode
UP
C:
Uni
form
Plu
mbi
ngC
ode
WES
C:W
AS
tate
Ene
rgy
Cod
e
#LB
CP
rere
q.
Aff
ecte
dC
ode
Cod
eSe
ctio
nD
escr
iptio
nC
ode
Lang
uage
Pro
ject
Con
cern
Pro
pose
dR
ecom
men
datio
nR
efer
ence
/R
esou
rces
44�0
Net
zer
oW
ater
UP
C�6
�8.0
(A)
Hos
eB
ib
inst
alla
tion
Hos
ebi
bss
hall
notb
eal
low
edo
nre
clai
med
wat
erp
ipin
gsy
stem
s.H
ose
bibs
sho
uld
bea
llow
edo
nth
ere
clai
med
wat
ers
yste
mto
mee
tze
row
ater
goa
ls.
Allo
wh
ose
bibs
to
beu
sed
with
pro
per
sign
age.
N/A
4��0
Net
zer
oW
ater
UP
C�6
�8.0
(B)
Inst
alla
tion
-re
quir
es
devi
ces
to
allo
wfo
rde
activ
atio
n
The
recl
aim
edw
ater
sys
tem
and
the
pota
ble
wat
ers
yste
mw
ithin
the
build
ing
shal
lbe
prov
ided
with
the
requ
ired
ap
purt
enan
ces
(val
ves,
air
/vac
uum
rel
ief
valv
es,e
tc.)
toa
llow
for
deac
tivat
ion
ord
rain
age
asm
ayb
ere
quir
edb
yth
is
chap
ter.
Cos
tiss
ues
for
deac
tivat
ion
drai
nage
.C
onsi
der
sim
ilar
Alt
erna
teM
eans
and
M
etho
dsa
sre
cent
lyw
as
adop
ted
inO
rego
n.
Ore
gon
Plu
mbi
ngS
peci
alty
C
ode
08-0
�
46�0
Net
zer
oW
ater
UP
C
and
CC
C
UP
C�
6�8;
C
CC
24.
�7Tr
ench
ing
/re
clai
med
w
ater
pipe
Rec
laim
edw
ater
pip
ess
hall
notb
eru
nor
laid
inth
esa
me
tren
cha
spo
tabl
ew
ater
pip
es.
Ate
nfo
oth
oriz
onta
lse
para
tion
shal
lbe
mai
ntai
ned
betw
een
pres
suri
zed,
bur
ied
recl
aim
eda
ndp
otab
le
wat
erp
ipin
g.B
urie
dpo
tabl
ew
ater
pi
pes
cros
sing
pre
ssur
ized
rec
laim
ed
wat
erp
ipes
sha
llbe
laid
am
inim
umo
f�2
inch
esa
bove
the
recl
aim
edw
ater
pi
pes.
Rec
laim
edw
ater
pip
esla
idin
the
sam
etr
ench
or
cros
sing
bui
ldin
gse
wer
or
dra
inag
epi
ping
sha
llbe
inst
alle
din
co
mpl
ianc
ew
ithS
ectio
ns6
09.0
and
720
.0
ofth
isc
ode.
Rec
laim
edw
ater
pip
ess
hall
bep
rote
cted
sim
ilar
top
otab
lew
ater
pi
pes.
Req
uire
sve
ryla
rge
lott
om
ake
recl
aim
edw
ater
sup
ply
syst
ems
feas
ible
.
Allo
wfo
r“c
omm
on
sens
e”w
hen
requ
ired
se
para
tion
can
notb
em
aint
aine
d.
N/A
47�
Mat
eria
ls
Red
list
UP
CA
ppen
dix
Pip
eSt
anda
rds
UP
Cp
rovi
des
stan
dard
sfo
rP
VCa
ndC
PVC
on
ly.
No
stan
dard
sfo
ral
tern
ativ
epl
umbi
ngm
ater
ials
not
list
edo
nm
ater
ials
red
list(
i.e.P
EX).
Rev
ise
acce
ptab
lep
ipe
list.
For
Wat
er:
Duc
tile
iron
,HD
PE,
C
oncr
ete,
Cop
per,
PEX
Fo
rSe
wer
: C
oncr
ete,
HD
PE
For
Dra
in,W
aste
and
Ve
nts
(DW
V):
Cas
tIro
n,C
oppe
r,A
BS,
P
EX
Har
vie,
Jam
iew
ithL
ent,
Tom
,P
VC-F
ree
Pip
eP
urch
aser
s’
Rep
ort,
Hea
lthy
Bui
ldin
gN
etw
ork,
dra
ft�
�/0�
/02.
48�0
Net
zer
oW
ater
UP
C,
CC
C
24.�
7,
and
WAC
24
6-27
2A
UP
CT
able
�6-�
Loca
tion
of
Gra
yW
ater
Sy
stem
Tabl
e�6
-�p
rovi
des
setb
ack
requ
irem
ents
fo
rgr
eyw
ater
hol
ding
tank
san
ddi
spos
al
field
s.
Req
uire
sve
ryla
rge
lott
oha
ndle
gr
eyw
ater
.Allo
win
ggr
eyw
ater
for
reus
e ca
n he
lp L
BC
pro
ject
s m
eet
LBC
goa
lsfo
rne
tzer
ow
ater
.
Con
side
rsi
mila
rco
de
guid
eas
rec
entl
yw
as
adop
ted
inO
rego
n.
Ore
gon
Plu
mbi
ngS
peci
alty
C
ode
08-0
�
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: ��CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009a
pp
end
ix a
: fu
ll l
ist o
f sug
gest
ed s
trat
egie
s fo
r R
emov
ing
Code
& R
egul
ator
y B
arri
ers
(con
tinue
d)
RC
W:R
evis
edC
ode
ofW
ashi
ngto
nV
MC
:Van
couv
erM
unic
ipal
Cod
eC
CC
:Cla
rkC
ount
yC
ode
IB
C:In
tern
atio
nalB
uild
ing
Cod
eI
MC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lMec
hani
calC
ode
IFC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lFir
eC
ode
UP
C:
Uni
form
Plu
mbi
ngC
ode
WES
C:W
AS
tate
Ene
rgy
Cod
e
#LB
CP
rere
q.
Aff
ecte
dC
ode
Cod
eSe
ctio
nD
escr
iptio
nC
ode
Lang
uage
Pro
ject
Con
cern
Pro
pose
dR
ecom
men
datio
nR
efer
ence
/R
esou
rces
49��
Wat
er
Dis
char
geIM
C�0
7.2.
�C
onde
nsat
eD
ispo
sal
Con
dens
ate
from
all
cool
ing
coils
and
ev
apor
ator
ssh
allb
eco
nvey
edfr
omth
edr
ain
pan
outle
tto
ana
ppro
ved
plac
eof
di
spos
al.C
onde
nsat
esh
alln
otd
isch
arge
in
toa
str
eet,
alle
yor
oth
era
reas
so
asto
ca
use
anu
isan
ce.
Dra
inag
esy
stem
nee
dsto
be
deal
t with
on
site
for
LBC
pro
ject
s.
Con
side
ral
low
ing
reus
eof
co
nden
sate
.
Con
side
r de
finin
g co
nden
sate
dis
posa
las
gra
yw
ater
(for
toile
tflu
shin
g).
Envi
ronm
enta
lBui
ldin
gN
ews:
“A
lter
nativ
eW
ater
Sou
rces
:Su
pply
-Sid
eSo
lutio
nsfo
rG
reen
Bui
ldin
gs,”
May
�,
2008
.
�04
Net
zer
oEn
ergy
IMC
40�.
2O
utdo
orA
ir
Req
uire
dTh
em
inim
umv
entil
atio
nra
teo
freq
uire
dou
tdoo
rai
rsh
allb
ede
term
ined
in
acco
rdan
cew
ithS
ectio
n40
�.�.
Vent
ilatio
nra
tes
base
dso
lely
on
occu
panc
yte
ndto
sup
ply
mor
eou
tsid
eai
rth
ann
eces
sary
by
othe
rm
etho
ds.A
llow
ing
air
qual
ity
sens
ors
for
mea
suri
ngm
inim
um
vent
ilatio
nca
nhe
lps
ave
ener
gy.
Con
side
rm
akin
gA
SHR
AE
62.�
200
7th
em
anda
tory
met
hod
for
Vent
ilatio
nca
lcul
atio
ns
AN
SI/A
SHR
AE
Stan
dard
62
.�-2
007
Vent
ilatio
nfo
rA
ccep
tabl
eIn
door
Air
Qua
lity
��4
Net
zer
oEn
ergy
IMC
40�.
�Ve
ntila
tion
Rat
eVe
ntila
tion
syst
ems
shal
lbe
desi
gned
to
have
the
capa
city
tos
uppl
yth
em
inim
um
outd
oor
airfl
ow r
ate
dete
rmin
ed in
ac
cord
ance
with
tabl
e40
�.�
base
don
the
occu
panc
yof
the
spac
ean
dth
eoc
cupa
nt
load
or
othe
rpa
ram
eter
as
stat
edth
erei
n.
The
occu
pant
load
util
ized
for
desi
gn
ofth
eve
ntila
tion
syst
ems
hall
notb
ele
ssth
anth
enu
mbe
rde
term
ined
from
th
ees
timat
edm
axim
umo
ccup
antl
oad
rate
indi
cate
din
Tab
le4
0�.�
.Ven
tilat
ion
rate
sfo
roc
cupa
ncie
sno
trep
rese
nted
in
Tab
le4
0�.�
sha
llbe
det
erm
ined
by
ana
ppro
ved
engi
neer
ing
anal
ysis
.The
ve
ntila
tion
syst
ems
hall
bed
esig
ned
to
supp
lyth
ere
quir
edr
ate
ofv
entil
atio
nai
rco
ntin
uous
lyd
urin
gth
epe
riod
the
build
ing
iso
ccup
ied,
exc
epta
sot
herw
ise
stat
edin
oth
erp
rovi
sion
sof
the
code
.Ex
cept
ion:
The
occ
upan
tloa
dis
not
re
quir
edto
be
dete
rmin
ed,b
ased
on
the
estim
ated
max
imum
occ
upan
tloa
dra
te
indi
cate
din
Tab
le4
0�.�
whe
rea
ppro
ved
stat
istic
ald
ata
docu
men
tthe
acc
urac
yof
an
alt
erna
teo
ccup
antd
ensi
ty.
Tabl
eov
er-p
redi
cts
occu
panc
yby
ba
sing
max
imum
on
egre
ssle
vels
ra
ther
than
des
ign
occu
panc
y.
Con
side
ral
low
ing
IMC
ex
cept
ion
that
allo
ws
othe
roc
cupa
ncy
rate
sto
be
used
(eve
nif
notd
ocum
ente
din
pl
ans)
pro
vide
dus
eof
“a
ppro
ved
stat
istic
ald
ata
tod
ocum
enta
ccur
acy
of
alte
rnat
ive
antic
ipat
ed
occu
pant
den
sity
”in
ad
ditio
nto
the
curr
ent
Was
hing
ton
exce
ptio
nw
hich
sta
tes:
“w
here
oc
cupa
ncy
dens
ityis
kn
own
and
docu
men
ted
inth
epl
ans,
the
outs
ide
air
rate
may
be
base
don
the
desi
gno
ccup
ant
dens
ity”.
Inte
rnat
iona
lMec
hani
cal
Cod
e20
06.
�24
Net
zer
oEn
ergy
IMC
��4.
2En
ergy
R
ecov
ery
Vent
ilatio
nSy
stem
s-
proh
ibite
dap
plic
atio
ns
Ener
gyr
ecov
ery
vent
ilatio
nsy
stem
ssh
all
notb
eus
edin
the
follo
win
gsy
stem
s:
�.H
azar
dous
exh
aust
sys
tem
sco
vere
din
Sec
tion
��0.
2.D
ust,
stoc
k,a
nd
refu
ses
yste
ms
that
con
vey
expl
osiv
eor
flam
mab
le v
apor
s, fu
mes
or
dust
. 3.
Sm
oke
cont
rols
yste
ms
cove
red
inS
ectio
n��
�.4
.Com
mer
cial
kitc
hen
exha
ust
syst
ems
serv
ing
Type
Ian
dTy
peII
hoo
ds.
�.C
loth
esd
ryer
exh
aust
sys
tem
sco
vere
din
Sec
tion
�04.
Per
cod
ere
quir
emen
ts,L
BC
pr
ojec
ts lo
se o
ppor
tuni
ties
for
heat
re
clam
atio
n.
Pro
fide
code
gui
danc
e to
al
low
ext
erio
rco
nduc
tive
tran
sfer
ofh
eatf
rom
du
cts
orp
rovi
dea
nal
tern
ate
mea
ns
and
met
hods
for
air
trea
tmen
t and
filt
ratio
n sy
stem
sw
hich
rem
ove
cont
amin
ants
bef
ore
heat
rec
over
y.
No
refe
renc
est
anda
rdis
cu
rren
tly
avai
labl
e.
How
ever
,for
exa
mpl
e,
prod
ucts
for
impr
oved
gre
ase
rem
oval
/ext
ract
ion
from
ki
tche
nho
ode
xhau
stth
roug
hU
V tr
eatm
ent a
nd fi
ltra
tion
mak
eth
ese
airs
trea
ms
suita
ble
for
heat
rec
over
y.
Exam
ple
man
ufac
ture
r:
Gay
lord
USA
pro
duct
XG
-UV
seri
esfo
rki
tche
nho
ods.
w
ww
.gay
lord
usa.
com
�6 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
ap
pen
dix
a:
full
lis
t of s
ugge
sted
str
ateg
ies
for
Rem
ovin
g Co
de &
Reg
ulat
ory
Bar
rier
s (c
ontin
ued)
RC
W:R
evis
edC
ode
ofW
ashi
ngto
nV
MC
:Van
couv
erM
unic
ipal
Cod
eC
CC
:Cla
rkC
ount
yC
ode
IB
C:In
tern
atio
nalB
uild
ing
Cod
eI
MC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lMec
hani
calC
ode
IFC
:Inte
rnat
iona
lFir
eC
ode
UP
C:
Uni
form
Plu
mbi
ngC
ode
WES
C:W
AS
tate
Ene
rgy
Cod
e
#LB
CP
rere
q.
Aff
ecte
dC
ode
Cod
eSe
ctio
nD
escr
iptio
nC
ode
Lang
uage
Pro
ject
Con
cern
Pro
pose
dR
ecom
men
datio
nR
efer
ence
/R
esou
rces
���
Mat
eria
ls
Red
list
IMC
Cha
pter
�2
Pip
eSt
anda
rds
CP
VCP
last
icP
ipe.
Joi
nts
betw
een
CP
VC
plas
tic p
ipe
or fi
ttin
gs s
hall
be s
olve
nt-
cem
ente
d or
thre
aded
join
ts c
onfo
rmin
g to
Sec
tion
�20�
.�.
PVC
Pla
stic
Pip
e.J
oint
sbe
twee
n P
VC p
last
ic p
ipe
and
fittin
gs s
hall
be s
olve
nt-c
emen
ted
or th
read
ed jo
ints
co
nfor
min
gto
Sec
tion
�20�
.�.
Pip
est
anda
rds
viol
ate
LBC
Red
Li
st.
Rev
ise
pipe
list
re
fere
nced
inc
ode
to
incl
ude
HD
PE,
ste
el,a
nd
alum
inum
as
acce
ptab
le
alte
rnat
ives
toP
VC.
Har
vie,
Jam
iew
ithL
ent,
Tom
,
PVC
-Fre
eP
ipe
Pur
chas
ers’
R
epor
t,H
ealt
hyB
uild
ing
Net
wor
k,d
raft
��/
0�/0
2.
�4�0
Net
zer
oW
ater
IMC
�00�
.2P
otab
le
Wat
erS
uppl
y(B
oile
rs)
The
wat
ers
uppl
yto
all
boile
rss
hall
bec
onne
cted
ina
ccor
danc
ew
ithth
eIn
tern
atio
nalP
lum
bing
Cod
e.
Non
pota
ble
wat
ers
uppl
ysu
cha
sre
clai
med
wat
erc
ana
ssis
twith
m
eetin
gne
tzer
ow
ater
goa
ls.
Con
side
rus
eof
non
-po
tabl
ew
ater
sou
rce.
“Gui
delin
esfo
rW
ater
Reu
se”
U
.S.E
nvir
onm
enta
lPro
tect
ion
Age
ncy,
Sep
tem
ber
2004
.
����
Wat
er
Dis
char
geIM
C�0
09.�
Ope
n-ty
pe
expa
nsio
nta
nk
(dra
inag
e)
Ope
n-ty
pee
xpan
sion
tank
ssh
allb
elo
cate
da
min
imum
of4
feet
abo
veth
ehi
ghes
thea
ting
elem
ent.
The
tank
sha
llbe
ad
equa
tely
siz
edfo
rth
eho
twat
ers
yste
m.
An
over
flow
with
a m
inim
um d
iam
eter
of
�in
chs
hall
bein
stal
led
atth
eto
pof
the
tank
. The
ove
rflow
sha
ll di
scha
rge
the
drai
nage
sys
tem
ina
ccor
danc
ew
ithth
eIn
tern
atio
nalP
lum
bing
Cod
e.
Tom
eett
heL
BC
net
zer
ow
ater
pr
ereq
uisi
te,d
rain
age
need
sto
be
deal
t with
ons
ite. C
onsi
der
defin
ing
over
flow
as
grey
wat
er a
nd a
llow
th
isto
be
stor
edo
nsite
and
reu
sed
for
toile
t flus
hing
.
Con
side
r de
finin
g th
is
asg
ray
wat
er(f
orto
ilet
flush
ing)
.
N/A
�6��
Wat
er
Dis
char
geIM
C�2
06.2
Syst
emD
rain
D
own
Hyd
roni
cpi
ping
sys
tem
ssh
allb
ede
sign
ed
and
inst
alle
dto
per
mit
the
syst
emto
be
drai
ned.
Whe
reth
esy
stem
dra
ins
toth
epl
umbi
ngd
rain
age
syst
em,t
hein
stal
latio
nsh
allc
onfo
rmto
the
requ
irem
ents
oft
he
Inte
rnat
iona
lPlu
mbi
ngC
ode.
The
mee
tthe
LB
Cn
etz
ero
wat
er
prer
equi
site
,sys
tem
dra
ind
own
need
sto
be
deal
twith
ons
ite.
Con
side
ral
low
ing
syst
emd
rain
do
wn
to b
e de
fined
as
grey
wat
er
and
allo
ww
ater
tob
est
ored
ons
ite
and
reus
ed fo
r to
ilet fl
ushi
ng.
Con
side
r de
finin
g th
is
asg
ray
wat
er(f
orto
ilet
flush
ing)
.
N/A
�7�
Hab
itat
Exch
ange
��W
ater
D
isch
arge
IFC
�0�.
�.�
Fire
A
ppar
atus
A
cces
sR
oads
App
rove
d fir
e ap
para
tus
acce
ss r
oads
sh
allb
epr
ovid
edfo
rev
ery
faci
lity,
bu
ildin
g,o
rpo
rtio
nof
ab
uild
ing
and
shal
lex
tend
tow
ithin
��0
’ofa
llpo
rtio
nso
fthe
fa
cilit
y.
Mor
e la
nd r
equi
red
to a
chie
ve fi
re
acce
ssfo
rre
side
ntia
ldev
elop
men
t.C
onsi
der
alte
rnat
esto
pr
ovid
ing
dire
cta
cces
sfo
r fir
e tr
ucks
- c
iste
rns,
fir
e sp
rink
lers
etc
or
cons
ider
allo
win
gdi
ffer
entt
ypes
ofp
avin
gth
ata
llow
app
arat
us
acce
ss.
Ferg
uson
,Bru
ceK
.Por
ous
Pav
emen
ts,C
RC
Pre
ss,B
oca
Rat
on,F
lori
da,2
00�.
Th
ebo
okd
iscu
sses
alt
erna
tes
top
orou
spa
ving
.A
nyc
hoic
em
usta
lso
mee
tRed
Lis
tre
quir
emen
ts
-por
ous
aggr
egat
e-p
orou
stu
rf
-pla
stic
geo
cells
-o
pen-
join
ted
pavi
ng b
lock
s-o
pen-
cell
pavi
ngg
rids
-p
orou
sco
ncre
te
�8�
Hab
itat
Exch
ange
��W
ater
D
isch
arge
IFC
D�0
6.�
Fire
A
ppar
atus
A
cces
sR
oads
Mul
tifam
ily r
esid
entia
l pro
ject
s ha
ving
m
ore
than
�00
dw
ellin
gsu
nits
sha
llbe
eq
uipp
edth
roug
hout
with
two
sepa
rate
an
d ap
prov
ed fi
re a
ppar
atus
acc
ess
road
s.
Mor
e la
nd r
equi
red
to a
chie
ve fi
re
acce
ssfo
rre
side
ntia
ldev
elop
men
t.C
onsi
der
alte
rnat
esto
pr
ovid
ing
dire
cta
cces
sfo
r fir
e tr
ucks
- c
iste
rns,
fir
e sp
rink
lers
etc
or
cons
ider
allo
win
gdi
ffer
entt
ypes
of
pavi
ngth
ata
llow
wat
er
disc
harg
e.
N/A
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: �7CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
pri
orit
y #
1p
rior
ity
#2
pri
orit
y #
3p
rior
ity
#4
*mor
eth
ano
neb
oxh
ighl
ight
edw
ithth
esa
me
colo
rin
dica
tes
atie
d
escr
ipti
onst
rate
gies
educ
atio
nin
cent
ives
Code
lan
guag
e or
Reg
ulat
ory
pro
cess
Cha
nges
�In
stitu
tiona
l/
Pro
cess
B
arri
ers
Pro
vide
edu
catio
nan
dtr
aini
ngfo
rbo
thd
evel
oper
s/ow
ners
and
co
de o
ffici
als.
Defi
ne a
sus
tain
abili
ty o
r gr
een
deve
lopm
ent
ombu
dspe
rson
toh
elp
appl
ican
tsa
ndr
evie
wer
sw
ork
toge
ther
.
Nee
d co
nsis
tenc
y in
rev
iew
ers
- a
proj
ect s
houl
d st
ay
with
the
sam
ere
view
erth
roug
hout
its
life.
Set u
p a
syst
em fo
r ed
ucat
ion,
lice
nsin
g, a
nd c
ertifi
catio
n fo
r su
stai
nabl
eor
gre
end
evel
opm
entp
ract
ition
ers
soth
eyh
ave
cred
ibili
tyw
hen
deal
ing
with
rev
iew
ers
(who
may
hav
eth
esa
me
cred
entia
ls).
Stre
amlin
e ap
prov
als
for
qual
ified
“A-l
ist”
bui
lder
s,
desi
gner
s,e
tc.T
hec
ostf
orth
ese
revi
ews
shou
ldb
ere
duce
din
pro
port
ion
toth
eam
ount
ofr
evie
wn
eede
d(le
ssr
evie
ws
houl
dm
ean
low
erfe
es).
Rep
lace
the
“tur
nin
-get
feed
back
-tur
nin
aga
in-g
et
feed
back
aga
in”
loop
with
face
-to-
face
col
labo
ratio
n.
Shift
the
min
dset
of t
he ju
risd
ictio
ns to
be
mor
e po
sitiv
e an
d op
ento
new
idea
s.C
reat
egr
een
build
ing
tech
nica
lass
ista
nce
prog
ram
for
perm
itap
plic
ants
.G
et th
e ju
risd
ictio
n in
volv
ed e
arly
in th
e de
sign
pr
oces
s.
Setu
pqu
arte
rly
mee
tings
bet
wee
nbu
ilder
san
dbu
ildin
gof
ficia
ls fo
r be
tter
com
mun
icat
ion.
Per
mit
agen
cies
pro
vide
an
onlin
eda
taba
seo
fapp
rove
dal
tern
ates
,acc
essi
ble
byp
ublic
,and
gui
danc
edo
cum
ents
for
usin
gap
prov
eda
lter
nativ
es.
Pro
vide
trai
ning
on
gree
nbu
ildin
gte
chno
logi
esto
bui
ldin
gin
spec
tors
.P
rovi
de a
sin
gle
poin
t of c
onta
ct in
the
field
inst
ead
of
mul
tiple
insp
ecto
rs.
Set u
p qu
arte
rly
mee
tings
bet
wee
n bu
ilder
s, b
uild
ing
offic
ials
, an
dbu
ildin
gin
spec
tors
for
bett
erc
omm
unic
atio
n.In
volv
eth
ein
spec
tor
and
plan
sex
amin
ere
arly
in
the
desi
gnp
roce
ssto
faci
litat
eun
ders
tand
ing
ofth
epr
ojec
t goa
ls.
ap
pen
dix
B:
exte
rnal
sta
keho
lder
gro
up p
rior
itie
s
�8 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009p
rior
ity
#1
pri
orit
y #
2p
rior
ity
#3
pri
orit
y #
4
*mor
eth
ano
neb
oxh
ighl
ight
edw
ithth
esa
me
colo
rin
dica
tes
atie
d
escr
ipti
onst
rate
gies
educ
atio
nin
cent
ives
Code
lan
guag
e or
Reg
ulat
ory
pro
cess
Cha
nges
2En
ergy
Ef
ficie
ncy
Pro
vide
res
ourc
es/e
duca
tion
toh
elp
deve
lope
rsa
ndb
uild
ing
owne
rs u
nder
stan
d lif
e cy
cle
cost
ver
sus
first
cos
t.P
rovi
dein
cent
ives
for
incr
ease
dth
erm
alp
erfo
rman
ce
ofb
uild
ing
enve
lope
bey
ond
code
req
uire
men
ts.
Rem
ove
any
requ
irem
ents
for
min
imum
hou
ses
ize.
Pro
vide
per
mit
guid
ance
for
onsi
ter
enew
able
ene
rgy
syst
ems
(sol
ar,w
ind,
gro
und-
sour
ceh
eatp
umps
).C
reat
ea
utili
ty-b
ased
ince
ntiv
elik
eth
eEn
ergy
Tru
sto
fO
rego
n.D
evel
opm
axim
umh
ouse
/uni
tsiz
ere
quir
emen
ts.
Iden
tify
prof
essi
onal
sw
hoc
anc
ertif
yre
sult
sof
a
desi
gnc
harr
ette
bef
ore
subm
ittal
so
the
plan
res
ultin
gfr
omth
ech
arre
tte
can
bep
erm
itted
qui
ckly
.
Dev
elop
ord
inan
ces
for
onsi
ter
enew
able
ene
rgy
syst
ems
for
sola
ran
dw
ind.
Dev
elop
req
uire
men
tsfo
rpr
eser
ving
sol
ara
cces
s.
Pro
vide
“pl
ain
Engl
ish”
exc
eptio
nsw
hich
allo
wfo
rpa
ssiv
ehe
atin
gan
dco
olin
g.
Tie
ener
gyc
ode
requ
irem
ents
toc
limat
ech
ange
m
etri
css
uch
asth
e20
�0C
halle
nge.
Man
date
trac
king
ofa
ctua
lene
rgy
use
for
new
ly
perm
itted
pro
ject
s.
Incl
ude
a re
ach
code
(whi
ch id
entifi
es th
e ne
xt c
ode
cycl
een
ergy
usa
ger
equi
rem
ents
).
Pha
se-o
utin
cand
esce
ntb
ulb
use
thro
ugh
mor
ere
stri
ctiv
eco
des.
Req
uire
gre
ater
enf
orce
men
tofe
nerg
yco
de
requ
irem
ents
dur
ing
insp
ectio
ns.
Defi
ne r
equi
rem
ents
that
allo
w fo
r w
ind
turb
ines
in
rura
lare
as.
Defi
ne r
equi
rem
ents
that
allo
w fo
r sm
all u
rban
win
d en
ergy
sys
tem
ssu
cha
sve
rtic
ala
xis
win
dtu
rbin
eso
nbu
ildin
gro
ofs
orp
arap
ets.
Dev
elop
cod
ere
quir
emen
tsfo
rlig
htp
ollu
tion
redu
ctio
n.
ap
pen
dix
B:
exte
rnal
sta
keho
lder
gro
up p
rior
itie
s (c
ontin
ued)
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: �9CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
pri
orit
y #
1p
rior
ity
#2
pri
orit
y #
3p
rior
ity
#4
*mor
eth
ano
neb
oxh
ighl
ight
edw
ithth
esa
me
colo
rin
dica
tes
atie
d
escr
ipti
onst
rate
gies
educ
atio
nin
cent
ives
Code
lan
guag
e or
Reg
ulat
ory
pro
cess
Cha
nges
�N
on-
conv
entio
nal
Stru
ctur
es
(Str
awba
le)
Pro
vide
gui
danc
eon
app
rove
dde
sign
sth
atd
ono
treq
uire
in
depe
nden
ttes
ting.
Allo
w fo
r fle
xibl
e “i
ncub
ator
” pi
lot p
roje
cts
to te
st
alte
rnat
ive
mat
eria
ls.
Ifa
met
hod
isp
resc
ribe
dby
cod
ean
dfo
llow
ed,
rem
ove
requ
irem
entf
ora
nen
gine
erin
gst
amp.
Pro
vide
trai
ning
for
insp
ecto
rso
nun
conv
entio
nalt
echn
olog
ies.
Iden
tify
prof
essi
onal
sw
hoc
anc
ertif
yre
sult
sof
a
desi
gnc
harr
ette
bef
ore
subm
ittal
so
the
plan
res
ultin
gfr
omth
ech
arre
tte
can
bep
erm
itted
qui
ckly
.
Offi
cial
s sh
ould
use
com
mon
sen
se a
nd n
ot b
e af
raid
to
mak
ea
deci
sion
whe
na
situ
atio
nis
not
exa
ctly
w
ithin
the
code
par
amet
ers.
Inst
itute
as
take
hold
erg
roup
(e.g
.,m
anuf
actu
rer’
sre
pres
enta
tive,
cod
ere
view
,and
man
ager
)tha
tcan
pr
ovid
ea
quic
kre
view
and
dec
isio
n.
Setu
pa
syst
emto
take
pro
pose
dco
der
evis
ions
to
the
stat
equ
ickl
y.
4D
rive
way
&
Fire
Acc
ess
Roa
dW
idth
s
Pro
vide
gui
danc
eon
“re
ady
tou
se”
perm
eabl
epa
ving
sol
utio
ns
that
are
des
igne
d to
mee
t fire
truc
k lo
ads
in th
e C
ity/C
ount
y.
Off
er r
educ
ed fe
es fo
r pr
ojec
ts th
at u
se p
ervi
ous
pave
men
ts o
n dr
ivew
ays
and
fire
acce
ss r
oads
that
ar
ein
tegr
ated
into
an
onsi
tes
torm
wat
erm
anag
emen
tst
rate
gy.
Allo
wth
eus
eof
per
viou
spa
vem
ento
rgr
assc
rete
for
fire
acce
ss r
oads
; defi
ne s
truc
tura
l req
uire
men
ts.
Pro
vide
des
ign
sugg
estio
nsfo
rco
mbi
ned
perv
ious
acc
ess
road
w
ith s
trip
s of
con
vent
iona
l str
uctu
ral p
avem
ent t
hat fi
re v
ehic
les
can
driv
eon
.
Allo
w fl
exib
ility
in d
evel
opm
ent c
odes
for
elim
inat
ing
side
wal
ksa
ndc
urbs
and
rep
laci
ngth
emw
ithlo
w
impa
ctd
evel
opm
ents
torm
wat
ers
trat
egie
s.
Pro
mot
e th
e us
e of
spr
inkl
ers
inst
ead
of p
rovi
ding
fire
acc
ess
road
s,w
here
feas
ible
.C
oord
inat
e re
quir
emen
ts fo
r fir
e ac
cess
bet
wee
n th
e bu
ildin
g de
part
men
t and
the
fire
mar
shal
. Can
us
ing
smal
ler
med
ical
res
pons
eve
hicl
esr
educ
ere
quir
emen
ts?
Wor
k w
ith fi
re d
epar
tmen
ts to
enc
oura
ge in
nova
tive
gree
n bu
ildin
gst
rate
gies
.Lo
bby
for
narr
ower
fire
veh
icle
s.
Allo
wp
rovi
sion
sfo
req
uiva
lent
wat
ers
ourc
eso
n-si
te.
Look
at n
on-fl
amm
able
bui
ldin
g m
ater
ials
.
ap
pen
dix
B:
exte
rnal
sta
keho
lder
gro
up p
rior
itie
s (c
ontin
ued)
40 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009p
rior
ity
#1
pri
orit
y #
2p
rior
ity
#3
pri
orit
y #
4
*mor
eth
ano
neb
oxh
ighl
ight
edw
ithth
esa
me
colo
rin
dica
tes
atie
d
escr
ipti
onst
rate
gies
educ
atio
nin
cent
ives
Code
lan
guag
e or
Reg
ulat
ory
pro
cess
Cha
nges
�M
inim
um
Par
king
R
equi
rem
ents
Red
uced
par
king
can
sav
ede
velo
pers
mon
eyth
atc
anb
eus
ed
to o
ffse
t firs
t cos
t pre
miu
ms
for
othe
r gr
een
build
ing
elem
ents
. P
rovi
de e
duca
tion
on v
alue
/ben
efit o
f alt
erna
tive
tran
spor
tatio
n op
tions
for
mar
ket-
driv
enp
arki
nga
sses
smen
ts.
Red
uce
tran
spor
tatio
nSD
C’s
for
deve
lopm
ents
clo
seto
th
ece
ntra
lCity
.R
educ
e pa
rkin
g cr
iteri
a fo
r pr
ojec
ts th
at a
re c
lose
to
publ
ictr
ansp
orta
tion.
Cro
sse
valu
ate
park
ing
requ
irem
ents
with
new
st
orm
wat
erc
odes
and
pro
vide
ince
ntiv
esfo
rre
duci
ngp
arki
ngr
equi
rem
ents
tom
eets
torm
wat
er
man
agem
entg
oals
.
Elim
inat
ere
quir
emen
tfor
on-
site
par
king
inu
rban
ar
eas
clos
eto
pub
lictr
ansp
orta
tion.
Allo
wfo
rsm
alle
r,m
ore
com
pact
par
king
spa
ces
(mic
ro-v
ehic
les
pace
s).
Allo
wfo
rno
ncon
vent
iona
lpar
king
lotl
ayou
tsth
at
grou
ppa
rkin
gar
eas
tor
educ
eim
perv
ious
cov
erag
e.
6Se
tbac
ksa
nd
Sepa
ratio
nfo
rR
ainw
ater
C
iste
rns
Pro
vide
gui
danc
eon
des
igni
ng,p
erm
ittin
g,in
stal
ling,
and
m
aint
aini
ngr
ainw
ater
har
vest
ing
cist
erns
into
new
con
stru
ctio
nan
d re
trofi
t app
licat
ions
.
D
efine
acc
epta
ble
thre
shol
ds fo
r se
tbac
ks a
nd
build
ing
sepa
ratio
nth
atp
rom
ote
abov
e-gr
ound
ci
ster
ns.
a)C
onsi
der
cist
erns
like
gar
den
shed
s,
gaze
bos,
or
play
hous
es,f
orw
hich
ther
ear
ese
tbac
kw
aive
rs.
b)D
ono
tcou
ntc
iste
rns
ass
epar
ate
stru
ctur
es(i
.e.g
arag
es).
c)M
ake
cist
erns
exe
mpt
fr
omlo
tcov
erag
ere
stri
ctio
ns.d
)Allo
wa
nex
cept
ion
for
cist
erns
tob
ecl
oser
toth
ebu
ildin
gas
long
as
any
life-
safe
ty is
sues
(suc
h as
fire
acc
ess
and
not
bloc
king
egr
ess)
are
add
ress
eda
ndg
uida
nce
on
stru
ctur
alc
onsi
dera
tions
ofl
oadi
ngo
nto
build
ing
foun
datio
nsis
pro
vide
d.
Mak
eco
dep
erfo
rman
ce-d
rive
n.
Cre
ate
boile
rpla
tes
olut
ions
.
ap
pen
dix
B:
exte
rnal
sta
keho
lder
gro
up p
rior
itie
s (c
ontin
ued)
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: 4�CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009p
rior
ity
#1
pri
orit
y #
2p
rior
ity
#3
pri
orit
y #
4
*mor
eth
ano
neb
oxh
ighl
ight
edw
ithth
esa
me
colo
rin
dica
tes
atie
d
escr
ipti
onst
rate
gies
educ
atio
nin
cent
ives
Code
lan
guag
e or
Reg
ulat
ory
pro
cess
Cha
nges
7R
ural
Clu
ster
D
evel
opm
ents
Add
ress
the
unde
rlyi
ngis
sues
with
clu
ster
dev
elop
men
tsth
at
cont
ribu
teto
the
perc
eptio
nth
atth
eyd
on’t
wor
k.P
rovi
dein
cent
ives
for
smal
lcot
tage
hou
sing
(e.g
.de
nsity
bon
uses
)to
reta
inr
ural
cha
ract
er.
Cha
nge
code
so
that
rur
alc
lust
erd
evel
opm
ents
are
al
low
ed/e
ncou
rage
d:
a)In
clud
eru
ralc
lust
erd
evel
opm
ents
inu
pcom
ing
revi
sion
sto
the
Com
pP
lan.
b)
Pro
vide
for
flexi
bilit
y in
zon
ing
code
s to
allo
w
clus
ters
c)
Allo
wr
ural
clu
ster
son
land
with
outc
ritic
ala
reas
.d)
Cha
nge
defin
ition
of e
nvir
onm
enta
lly s
ensi
tive
area
sto
be
broa
der
top
rom
ote
clus
ter
deve
lopm
ent
inst
ead
ofli
miti
ngit
.e)
Rem
ove
criti
cala
reas
by
putt
ing
them
intr
acts
in
perp
etui
ty.
f)A
llow
mul
ti-fa
mily
inr
ural
are
as
Defi
ne w
hen/
whe
re r
ural
clu
ster
dev
elop
men
ts a
re b
enefi
cial
ev
enw
here
des
igna
ted
envi
ronm
enta
llyc
ritic
ala
reas
do
not
exis
t.
Allo
w fo
r fle
xibl
e “o
wne
rshi
p” m
odel
s lik
e as
soci
atio
nsa
sa
way
toa
ddre
ssc
omm
ona
reas
in
clus
ter
deve
lopm
ents
.
Pro
vide
edu
catio
nan
dgu
idan
cefo
ron
site
hab
itate
xcha
nge
area
s.
Cre
ate
“gre
en”
zone
s w
ith fl
exib
ility
in c
ode
requ
irem
ents
ine
xcha
nge
for
mee
ting
goal
sfo
rsi
te p
rote
ctio
n, lo
w im
pact
, effi
cien
t dev
elop
men
t pr
actic
es.
Pro
vide
info
rmat
ion
on p
oten
tial c
ost/
bene
fits
for
clus
ter
deve
lopm
ents
.Ti
eac
cess
req
uire
men
tsfo
rcl
uste
rde
velo
pmen
tsto
se
rvic
esa
ndtr
ansp
orta
tion
avai
labi
lity
Pro
vide
edu
catio
nto
dev
elop
ers
onp
ossi
ble
low
erim
pact
rur
al
deve
lopm
ents
trat
egie
s.
8To
xic
Mat
eria
lsC
reat
ea
web
-bas
edr
esou
rce
guid
eof
pro
duct
sth
ata
re
envi
ronm
enta
llyfr
iend
lya
nda
ppro
ved
for
use
byth
ebu
ildin
gof
ficia
ls.
Li
mit
the
docu
men
tatio
npr
oces
sne
cess
ary
for
prod
ucts
with
out a
sig
nific
ant h
ealt
h or
saf
ety
haza
rd
-i.e
.a“
poor
man
’sU
L”.
Lobb
yto
cha
nge
code
req
uire
men
tso
nth
est
ate
or
natio
nall
evel
.
Inst
itute
less
pre
scri
ptiv
eco
dela
ngua
gefo
rm
ater
ials
/che
mic
als.
Inst
itute
per
form
ance
-bas
eds
tand
ards
.
ap
pen
dix
B:
exte
rnal
sta
keho
lder
gro
up p
rior
itie
s (c
ontin
ued)
42 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009p
rior
ity
#1
pri
orit
y #
2p
rior
ity
#3
pri
orit
y #
4
*mor
eth
ano
neb
oxh
ighl
ight
edw
ithth
esa
me
colo
rin
dica
tes
atie
d
escr
ipti
onst
rate
gies
educ
atio
nin
cent
ives
Code
lan
guag
e or
Reg
ulat
ory
pro
cess
Cha
nges
9C
onne
ctio
nto
P
ublic
Wat
er
Supp
ly
Pro
vide
edu
catio
nab
outt
hed
esig
nan
dus
eof
clo
sed-
loop
w
ater
sys
tem
s.W
ork
with
wat
erp
urve
yors
tod
evel
opfe
est
ruct
ure
toin
cent
iviz
ene
t-ze
row
ater
sys
tem
ssu
cha
sw
aive
dor
red
uced
fees
for
proj
ects
not
con
nect
ed to
the
mun
icip
als
yste
m.
Dev
elop
new
cod
e la
ngua
ge th
at id
entifi
es th
e cr
iteri
a al
low
ing
for
exem
ptio
nsto
pub
licw
ater
sup
ply
conn
ectio
ns.
Add
ress
pot
entia
llos
sof
ant
icip
ated
rev
enue
sto
wat
er
purv
eyor
s.A
llow
use
ofc
omm
unity
cis
tern
s.
Iden
tify
and
addr
ess
heal
this
sues
aro
und
rain
wat
erh
arve
stin
gan
dgr
eyw
ater
reu
se.
Allo
w r
ainw
ater
cis
tern
s to
be
used
for
fire
stor
age.
�0C
onne
ctio
nto
P
ublic
Sew
erP
rovi
dee
duca
tion
abou
tthe
des
ign
and
use
ofc
lose
d-lo
op
was
tew
ater
sys
tem
s.W
ork
with
wat
erp
urve
yors
tod
evel
opfe
est
ruct
ure
toin
cent
iviz
ene
t-ze
row
aste
wat
ers
yste
ms
such
as
wai
ved
or r
educ
ed fe
es fo
r pr
ojec
ts n
ot c
onne
cted
to
the
mun
icip
als
yste
m.
Dev
elop
new
cod
e la
ngua
ge th
at id
entifi
es th
e cr
iteri
a al
low
ing
for
exem
ptio
nsto
pub
lics
ewer
con
nect
ions
.
Add
ress
pot
entia
llos
sof
ant
icip
ated
rev
enue
sto
sew
er
purv
eyor
s.
Iden
tify
and
addr
ess
heal
this
sues
aro
und
com
mun
itys
eptic
sy
stem
s.
��O
nsite
Fue
lSt
orag
eR
athe
rth
ano
nsite
veh
icle
fuel
sto
rage
,pro
vide
des
ign
and
perm
ittin
ggu
idan
cea
nde
duca
tion
for
elec
tric
-plu
gin
veh
icle
s.
Wor
kw
ithth
eSt
ate
tod
evel
opc
ode
lang
uage
that
al
low
sfo
ron
site
veh
icle
fuel
sto
rage
.
Def
erto
exi
stin
gst
anda
rds
for
heat
ing
fuel
,tho
ugh
any
unde
rgro
und
stor
age
wou
ldn
otb
eid
eal.
App
lyg
uide
lines
from
agr
icul
tura
luse
s.
ap
pen
dix
B:
exte
rnal
sta
keho
lder
gro
up p
rior
itie
s (c
ontin
ued)
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: 4�CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
appendix C: ReCommendations foR Regional CollaBoRation effoRt in ClaRk County
Thefollowingrecommendationsarefordevelopingaregionalcollaborationefforttosupportimprovedconsistencyandcollaborationforremovingbarriersandapprovingsustainabledevelopment projects within Clark County including the cities of Battle Ground, Camas, La Center, Ridgefield, Vancouver, Washougal and the town of Yacolt.
1. identify key public agency and community members to sit on a regional stakeholder committee.
Representativesfromthebuildingandplanningdepartments,ClarkCountyPublicHealth,andgreenbuildingadvocatesfromthedesign,engineeringandbuildingsectorsshouldberepresentedonthecommittee.Earlycommitteemeetingsshouldbeusedtoestablishcommitteegoals,objectives, meeting schedules, and expected outcomes.
2. develop a process for reviewing, approving, and communicating results from green building projects using alternative code compliance approaches.
Utilize the draft resource package developed through the SARD project as a template for developing anonlinedatabasetotrackandcommunicateapprovedalternates.Tobeusefultoawiderangeofaudiences,theonlineresourcedatabasewouldneedtobeaccessibletobothpublicagenciesaswellastheprivatedevelopmentcommunity.Thedatabaseshouldbeeasilysearchablebydesignstrategy, code reference, project type, and jurisdiction. Ongoing management of the database would benecessarytoensureinformationisaccurate,up-to-date,anduseful.Ultimately,theinformationfromtheresourcedatabaseonapprovedalternatesshouldbeusedforfutureupdatestocodesandstandardstosupportmoresustainabledevelopmentpractices.
3. implement region-wide incentives to encourage more sustainable development projects.
Utilizingtherecommendationslistedinthisreport,theregionalstakeholdercommitteeshouldassessthefeasibilityofadoptingincentivessuchasprioritypermitprocessingorreducedfeesacross jurisdictional boundaries. Leverage resources available amongst the public agencies and seekfundingfromstateorfederalsourcestoimplementincentives.
4. host trainings to provide technical learning experiences as well as opportunities to share resources and network with peers.
Trainingscanbeinformalbrown-bagtypesessionsormoreelaborateworkshops.Thegoalofthetrainingsistoincreaseunderstandingandknowledgeofgreenbuildingdesignstrategiesandemergingtechnologies.Trainingsshouldbetargetedbothtowardspublicagenciesandtheprivatedevelopmentcommunity.
5. develop performance indicators and tracking methods for evaluating the success of the regional stakeholder committee.
Examplesincludenumberofgreenbuildingspermitted,numberofattendeesateducationalevents,andnumberofpotentialregulatorybarriersremovedthroughtheuseoftheonlineresourcedatabase,andnumberofcodesorregulatoryproceduresamendedtosupportsustainabledevelopment projects.
44 Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
appendix d: pRojeCt paRtiCipants & stakeholdeRs
Consultants:
KatieSpataro,ResearchDirector,CascadiaRegionGreenBuildingCouncilLisaPetterson,SERAArchitects
saRd project leads:
MarianLahav,SeniorPlanner,CityofVancouverGordyEuler,Planner,ClarkCounty
saRd steering Committee:
Jim Muir, Chief Building Official, Clark CountyBrianCarlson,PublicWorksDirector,CityofVancouverLauraHudson,LongRangePlanningManager,CityofVancouverJohnGentry,LeadDeputyFireMarshal,VancouverFireDepartmentJeriNewbold,ResidentialPlansExaminer,CityofVancouverPeteDuBois,SustainabilityCoordinator,ClarkCountyDonSkaggs,EngineeringManager,SanitarySewerSystem,CityofVancouverTomScott,FireInspector,ClarkCountyFireAhmadQayoumi,TransportationConcurrencyManager,CityofVancouverAnnetteGriffy,SurfaceWaterManagementManager,CityofVancouverChadEiken,PlanningReviewTeamManager,CityofVancouverChadLawry,DeputyFireMarshal,VancouverFireDepartmentCharlesRay,UrbanForester,CityofVancouverCindy Meyer, Building Official, City of VancouverDavidScott,DevelopmentReviewServicesDirector,CityofVancouverDianeStites,VancouverHousingAuthorityJimCrawford,FireMarshal,VancouverFireDepartmentJonDunaway,FireMarshal,ClarkCountyFireDepartmentMichaelButts,CommunityDevelopment,ClarkCountyMikePiper,SustainabilityCoordinator,CityofVancouverPeggySheehan,CommunityDevelopmentBlockGrantProgramManager,CityofVancouverSueStepan,EngineeringServicesManager,ClarkCountyTomGonzales,ResourceProtectionProgramsManager,ClarkCountyPublicHealth
water Barriers stakeholders:
Cindy Meyer, Building Official, City of VancouverLouMalattia,LeadPlansExaminer,ClarkCountyTomGonzales,ResourceProtectionProgramsManager,ClarkCountyPublicHealthDougQuinn,WaterDepartmentDirector,ClarkPublicUtilitiesDistrictJohnPeterson,GeneralManager,ClarkRegionalWastewaterDistrictTomBoyer,AssistantCityEngineer,CityofVancouverMike O’Rourke, Business Agent, Plumbers & Steamfitters Union UA290Ron Murray, Legislative Lobbyist, Plumbers & Steamfitters Union UA290KurtUnger,WaterResourcesProgram,WADepartmentofEcologyGinnyStern,Environmental&PublicHealthLiaison,WADepartmentofHealth
Report#2,Strategies&Recommendations: 4�CodeBarriersforSustainable,Affordable,ResidentialDevelopment
�7April2009
external stakeholders and other staff:
JeffWhitten,TheWolfeGroup,LLCMasonWolfe,CreationHomes,LLCTom Dessert, Century 21 Cascade PacificBillHart,CarletonHartArchitectureDebbyDover,YWHousingMikeOdren,OlsonEngineeringCyndiThompson,SunriseHomeBuildersDarrenBates,SunriseHomeBuildersDavidCommeree,NewTraditionHomesRyanZygar,TamarackCorpJillSughrue,Sustain-NWMarkLyles,NewBuildingsInstituteJamieClark,SGAEngineeringDestonDennison,AbundanceConsultingChuckDougherty,SynergyDesignGroupSteveTapio,NewTraditionHomesJarretHelmes,NewTraditionHomesHenryDiaz,Mackay&SpositoAmyDvorak,Maul,Foster,AlongiTimothyBuckley,GreenstoneArchitecturePatrickSughrue,StructuresNWEdGreerBrianKashas,KashasConstruction,Inc.EvanDust,HDR,Inc.AdrienneDeDona,JeanneLawsonAssociatesJimEdelson,NewBuildingsInstituteChrisMiner,IndependentDesignerSteveMadsen,BuildingIndustryAssociationofClarkCountyShane McGuffin, Sequoia Builders, LLCPeteDuBois,SustainabilityCoordinator,ClarkCountyCathyGolik,DevelopmentReviewServices,CityofVancouverRichMcConaghy,SolidWaste&WaterResourcesEducationCenter,CityofVancouverNasiemaWingate-Pearse,Sustainability,ClarkCountyNickPhillips,DevelopmentReviewServices,CityofVancouver