San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement Project€¦ · 7-Day Classification Counts Appendix E Speed...

Traffic Impact Analysis

San Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project

Prepared by:Kimley-Horn and Associates401 B Street, Suite 600San Diego, CA 92101619-234-9411

Prepared for:SANDAG401 B Street, Suite 800San Diego, CA 92101619-699-1900

June 2010

KHA NO. 095596021

© Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1—1

PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................................... 1—1ANALYSIS SCENARIOS .......................................................................................................................... 1—1

2.0 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................ 2—1

TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTING .......................................................................................................... 2—1STUDY INTERSECTIONS......................................................................................................................... 2—1ANALYSIS PROCESS .............................................................................................................................. 2—2

Analysis Software .............................................................................................................................. 2—2Intersections ...................................................................................................................................... 2—2Roadway Segments ............................................................................................................................ 2—3

SIGNIFICANCE DETERMINATION ............................................................................................................ 2—4

3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS................................................................................................................ 3—1

ROAD NETWORK .................................................................................................................................. 3—1TRAFFIC VOLUMES............................................................................................................................... 3—1INTERSECTION ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................... 3—1ROADWAY SEGMENT ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................... 3—1

4.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC ........................................................................................................................ 4—1

TRIP GENERATION ................................................................................................................................ 4—1TRIP DISTRIBUTION .............................................................................................................................. 4—1TRIP ASSIGNMENT ................................................................................................................................ 4—1

5.0 NEAR TERM CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................... 5—1

ROAD NETWORK .................................................................................................................................. 5—1CUMULATIVE PROJECTS ....................................................................................................................... 5—1TRAFFIC VOLUMES............................................................................................................................... 5—1INTERSECTION ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................... 5—1ROADWAY SEGMENT ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................... 5—1

6.0 2030 HORIZON YEAR CONDITIONS............................................................................................ 6—1

ROAD NETWORK .................................................................................................................................. 6—1TRAFFIC VOLUMES............................................................................................................................... 6—1INTERSECTION ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................... 6—1ROADWAY SEGMENT ANALYSIS ........................................................................................................... 6—1

7.0 OTHER ISSUES ................................................................................................................................ 7—1

SITE ACCESS AND ON-SITE CIRCULATION .............................................................................................. 7—1SIGHT DISTANCE .................................................................................................................................. 7—1

8.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................... 8—1

SUMMARY OF INTERSECTION ANALYSES ............................................................................................... 8—1SUMMARY OF ROADWAY SEGMENT ANALYSES ..................................................................................... 8—1

i

List of Figures

Figure 1-1 Regional Vicinity Map ..................................................................................................... 1—3Figure 1-2 Proposed Site Plan ............................................................................................................ 1—4Figure 3-1 Existing Intersection Geometrics ...................................................................................... 3—2Figure 3-2 Existing Roadway Geometrics .......................................................................................... 3—3Figure 3-3 Existing Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes ................................................................................ 3—4Figure 3-4 Existing ADT Volumes .................................................................................................... 3—5Figure 4-1 Peak-Hour Project Trip Distribution-Study Intersections ................................................... 4—3Figure 4-2 Project Trip Distribution-Roadway Segments ................................................................... 4—4Figure 4-3 Heavy Truck Trip Distribution .......................................................................................... 4—5Figure 4-4 Project Trip Assignment-Study Intersections .................................................................... 4—6Figure 4-5 Project Trip Assignment - Roadway Segments .................................................................. 4—7Figure 5-1 Near Term Baseline Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .............................................................. 5—2Figure 5-2 Near Term Baseline ADT volumes ................................................................................... 5—3Figure 5-3 Near Term with Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ......................................................... 5—4Figure 5-4 Near Term with Project ADT volumes .............................................................................. 5—5Figure 6-1 Horizon Year Baseline Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes .......................................................... 6—2Figure 6-2 Horizon Year Baseline ADT Volumes .............................................................................. 6—3Figure 6-3 Horizon Year with Project Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes .................................................... 6—4Figure 6-4 Horizon Year with Project ADT Volumes ......................................................................... 6—5Figure 7-1 Sight Distance Evaluation ................................................................................................. 7—2

ii

List of Tables

Table 2-1 Study Intersections............................................................................................................ 2—2Table 2-2 Level of Service (LOS) Criteria For Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections ................. 2—3Table 2-3 City of San Diego Roadway Segment Capacity and Level of Service ................................ 2—4Table 2-4 Levels of Significance Criteria for Intersections and Roadway Segments .......................... 2—5Table 3-1 Existing Conditions Peak-Hour Intersection LOS Summary .............................................. 3—6Table 3-2 Existing Conditions Roadway Segment LOS Summary ..................................................... 3—7Table 4-1 Trip Generation Summary ................................................................................................. 4—2Table 5-1 Near Term Conditions Peak-Hour Intersection LOS Summary .......................................... 5—6Table 5-2 Near Term Conditions Roadway Segment LOS Summary ................................................. 5—7Table 6-1 Horizon Year Conditions Peak-Hour Intersection LOS Summary ...................................... 6—6Table 6-2 Horizon Year Conditions Roadway Segment LOS Summary ............................................. 6—7Table 8-1 Summary of Peak-Hour Intersection LOS Results ............................................................. 8—2Table 8-2 Summary of Roadway Segment LOS Results .................................................................... 8—3

List of Appendices

Appendix AExisting Traffic Volumes Data

Appendix BPeak-Hour Intersection Level of Service Worksheets

Appendix CSANDAG 2030 Forecast Plot

Appendix D7-Day Classification Counts

Appendix ESpeed Data Counts

Traffic Impact Analysis Executive SummarySan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project June 2010

Executive SummaryThis study, prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., evaluates the potential off site traffic-relatedimpacts associated with the proposed improvements to the San Ysidro Rail Yard. The purpose of theproject is to improve operation capacity and efficiency at the Rail Yard to accommodate existing andfuture freight rail operations in the region. The project will include the construction of two new trackextensions to the north that would provide additional storage capacity, as well as the ability to switch railcars outside of the constrained operating windows without interrupting the trolley line. A majority of thecapacity increase within the yard is intended for throughput operations; however as part of the project, thenumber of locations which can be used as docking/unloading spots will increase from 3 spots toapproximately 15 spots. This increase in docking/unloading spots will allow for an increase of trucktraffic coming to the yard to load and unload products.

The existing site has access at the driveway located along the north side of East Beyer Boulevard; justeast of Bolton Hall Road. As part of the improvements, a new exit only driveway will be constructedalong the east side of East Beyer Boulevard parallel to the railroad track. The existing driveway will beconverted to an entrance only driveway.

The proposed project was not found to have any off site transportation related impacts at any of theintersections and roadway segments within the study area.

Traffic Impact Analysis IntroductionSan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 1—1 June 2010

1.0 INTRODUCTIONThe following traffic study has been prepared to determine and evaluate the potential off site trafficimpacts associated with the proposed improvements to the San Ysidro Rail Yard. Figure 1-1 depicts thelocation of the project site in a regional context.

Project Description

The purpose of the project is to improve operational capacity and efficiency at the Rail Yard toaccommodate existing and future freight rail operations in the region. The project will include theconstruction of two new track extensions to the north that would provide additional storage capacity, aswell as the ability to switch rail cars outside of the constrained operating windows without interruptingthe trolley line. A majority of the capacity increase within the yard is intended for throughput operations;however as part of the project, the number of locations which can be used as docking/unloading spots willincrease from 3 spots to approximately 15 spots. This increase in docking/unloading spots will allow foran increase of truck traffic coming to the yard to load and unload products. Based on the nature of theproducts being unloaded from the rail cars, the additional 12 spots will allow for between 3 to 4 trucktrips per rail car, and typical unloading patterns will result in an average of 1 to 2 days for unloading percar. Based on the expected unloading rates, the typical daily additional truck trips expected as a result ofthis project will be up to 28 truck trips per day (See calculation below).

Number of additional spots available = 12Average number of truck per rail car = 3.5Average unloading rate = 1.5 days

Average number of additional new daily truck trips: (12 x 3.5) / 1.5 = 28

The existing site has access at the driveway located along the north side of East Beyer Boulevard just eastof Bolton Hall Road. As part of the improvements, a new exit only driveway will be constructed alongthe east side of East Beyer Boulevard parallel to the railroad track. The existing driveway will beconverted to an entrance only driveway. Figure 1-2 shows the proposed site plan for the project.

Analysis Scenarios

A total of five scenarios were analyzed as part of the project, which are listed below:

Existing Conditions (2009)Existing Conditions: Represents the traffic conditions of the existing street network.

Near Term Conditions (2010)Near Term Baseline Conditions: Represents the traffic conditions of the street network assumedto be in place in the near term and is used to establish a near term, without project baseline forcomparison.Near Term with Project Conditions: Represents the near term traffic conditions with the additionof the proposed project.

Horizon Year Conditions (2030)

Traffic Impact Analysis IntroductionSan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 1—2 June 2010

Horizon Year Baseline Conditions: Represents the traffic conditions of the street networkassumed to be in place under Horizon Year conditions. The Horizon Year is consistent with theCity’s General Plan and is used to establish a long-term, without project baseline for comparison.Horizon Year Plus Project Conditions: Represents the Horizon Year traffic conditions with theaddition of the proposed project.

NOT TO SCALE

FIGURE 1-1 Regional Vicinity Map

San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement Project

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Illustrator\vicinity map south sd.ai

INTERSTATE

CALIFORNIA

805

INTERSTATE

CALIFORNIA

8

INTERSTATE

CALIFORNIA

5

INTERSTATE

CALIFORNIA

15

905

163

54

52

94

125

67

INTERSTATE

CALIFORNIA

5

INTERSTATE

CALIFORNIA

805

CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA

CALIFORNIA

125

Project Site

Imperial Beach

Coronado

San Diego

El Cajon

Lemon Grove

National City

Chula Vista

La Mesa

Santee

United States

Mexico

1-3

E BEYER BLVD

E B

EY

ER

BLV

D

E S

AN

YS

IDR

O B

LVD

BLU

EBA

RN

INTERNATIO

NAL

BOUNDARY

MA

IN T

RAC

K

San

Ysi

dro

Rai

lro

ad Y

ard

Imp

rove

men

t Pr

oje

ct

K:\S

ND

_TR

AN

S\0

9559

6020

\San

Ysi

dro

Yard

Tra

ffic

Stu

dy\Il

lust

rato

r\Site

Pla

n.ai

FIG

UR

E 1

-2S

ite P

lan

Not

to S

caleN

ew E

xit D

wy

Exi

stin

g D

wy

1-4

Traffic Impact Analysis MethodologySan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 2—1 June 2010

2.0 METHODOLOGYThe following section describes the methodology used in the process of forecasting model data,determination of study intersections, analysis process, and determination of significant impacts.

Traffic Volume Forecasting

Traffic volumes for the Near Term condition were estimated by adding the traffic related to all thepending/approved cumulative projects to the existing traffic volumes.

The Horizon Year Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes on the roadway segments in the study area weredetermined from SANDAG’s 2030 Regional Transportation Plan (Mobility 2030) and the Final 2030Regional Growth Forecast.

To estimate the Horizon Year turning movement volumes at the study intersections, the existing turningmovements at each respective study intersection were factored up based on the projected ADT volumesalong each approach. Each respective movement would be derived using an iterative approach thatbalances the inflows and outflows for each approach. The input values include the existing turningmovement volumes and future year peak hour approach and departure volumes along each leg of theintersection. The future peak hour approach volumes would be estimated by applying the existing peak-hour factor (K-factor) and directional distributional percentage (D-factor) to the future ADT volumesalong each approach. A more detailed description of the methodology used to forecast turning movementvolumes is contained in NCHRP 255 Highway Traffic Data for Urbanized Area Project Planning andDesign, Chapter 8. An Excel model computes the forecast turning volumes from existing turningmovement volumes and forecasted approach and departure volumes by the techniques described inNCHRP 255. As a conservative approach, if a turning movement volume produced by this model wasless than the existing count for that movement, manual adjustments were made to assure that all forecasthorizon year volumes would be equal or greater than the existing turning movement counts.

Study Intersections

The study area was defined based on likely project traffic patterns and procedures summarized in the Cityof San Diego’s Traffic Impact Study Manual, July 1998. The following intersections shown in Table 2-1,which represent primary ingress/egress to and from the project site and the surrounding community, wereidentified for evaluation.

As shown in Table 2-1, with the exception of the I-805 ramps along East San Ysidro Boulevard, allintersection are unsignalized. The two I-805 ramps along East San Ysidro Boulevard are signalizedintersections. All study intersections are located within the City of San Diego’s limits.


Table 2-1 Study Intersections

TABLE 2-1 STUDY INTERSECTIONS

Intersection Traffic Control (a)

1 Proposed New Dwy & E. Beyer Blvd OWSC

2 E. Beyer Blvd & Hill St- Center St AWSC

3 E. Beyer Blvd & Bolton Hall Road OWSC

4 E. Beyer Blvd & Existing Dwy OWSC

5 E. San Ysidro Blvd & Center St OWSC

6 E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-80 NB Ramp Signal

7 E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-80 SB Ramp Signal

Notes:(a) Signal = Traffic signal, OWSC=One –Way Stopped Control; AWSC= All-Way Stop Control

Analysis Process

The analysis process includes determining the operations at the study intersections for the a.m. and p.m.peak-hours and operations along the roadway segments by using ADT volumes. Intersections will bemeasured and quantified by using the Synchro traffic analysis software package. Results will becompared to the City’s standards and determined if the project has any significant impacts.

Analysis Software

To analyze the operations of both signalized and unsignalized intersections, Synchro 6.0 (Trafficware)was used for the analysis. Synchro 6.0 uses the methodologies outlined in the 2000 Highway CapacityManual (HCM).

The existing intersection peak-hour factor (PHF) was used for all scenarios.

Intersections

The 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) published by the Transportation Research Board establishesa system whereby highway facilities are rated for their ability to process traffic volumes. Theterminology "level of service" is used to provide a "qualitative" evaluation based on certain "quantitative"calculations, which are related to empirical values.


Level of service (LOS) for signalized intersections is defined in terms of delay, which is a measure ofdriver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and loss of travel time. Specifically, LOS criteria arestated in terms of the average control delay per vehicle for the peak 15-minute period within the houranalyzed. The average control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, and finalacceleration time in additional to the stop delay. The level of service for unsignalized intersections isdetermined by the computed or measured control delay and is defined for each minor movement. Thecriteria for the various levels of service designations for signalized and unsignalized intersections aregiven in Table 2-2.

Table 2-2 Level of Service (LOS) Criteria For Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections

TABLE 2-2 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED AND UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS

LOS

Signalized(Control Delay

(sec/veh))(a)

Unsignalized(Average control

delay(sec/veh))(b) Description

A <10.0 <10.0 Operations with very low delay and most vehicles do not stop.

B >10.0 and <20.0 >10.0 and <15.0 Operations with good progression but with some restricted movement.

C >20.0 and <35.0 >15.0 and <25.0 Operations where a significant number of vehicles are stopping withsome backup and light congestion.

D >35.0 and <55.0 >25.0 and <35.0 Operations where congestion is noticeable, longer delays occur, andmany vehicles stop. The proportion of vehicles not stopping declines

E >55.0 and <80.0 >35.0 and <50.0 Operations where there is significant delay, extensive queuing, and poorprogression.

F >80.0 >50.0 Operations that are unacceptable to most drivers, when the arrival ratesexceed the capacity of the intersection.

Source:(a) 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, Chapter 16, Page 2, Exhibit 16-2(b) 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, Chapter 17, Page 2, Exhibit 17-2

Within the City of San Diego, all signalized and unsignalized intersections are expected to operate at LOSD or better.

Roadway Segments

In order to determine the impacts on the study area roadway segments, Table 2-3 has been developed bythe City of San Diego and is used as a reference. The segment traffic volumes under LOS E as shown inthis table are considered at capacity because at LOS E the v/c Ratio is equal to 1.0.


Table 2-3 City of San Diego Roadway Segment Capacity and Level of Service

TABLE 2-3 CITY OF SAN DIEGO ROADWAY SEGMENT CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE

Road Level of Service (LOS)Class Lanes A B C D E

Freeway 8 60,000 84,000 120,000 140,000 150,000

Freeway 6 45,000 63,000 90,000 110,000 120,000

Freeway 4 30,000 42,000 60,000 70,000 80,000

Expressway 6 30,000 42,000 60,000 70,000 80,000

Prime Arterial 6 25,000 35,000 50,000 55,000 60,000

Major Arterial 6 20,000 28,000 40,000 45,000 50,000

Major Arterial 4 15,000 21,000 30,000 35,000 40,000

Collector 4 10,000 14,000 20,000 25,000 30,000

Collector (No center lane)(Continuous left-turn lane)

42 5,000 7,000 10,000 13,000 15,000

Collector(No fronting property) 2 4,000 5,500 7,500 9,000 10,000

Collector(Commercial/Industrial fronting) 2 2,500 3,500 5,000 6,500 8,000

Collector(Multi-family) 2 2,500 3,500 5,000 6,500 8,000

Sub-Collector(Single family) 2 --- --- 2,200 --- ---

Notes:The volumes and the average daily level of service listed above are only intended as a general planning guideline.Levels of service are not applied to residential streets since their primary purpose is to serve abutting lots, not carry through traffic. Levels of servicenormally apply to roads carrying through traffic between major trip generators and attractors.

Source: City of San Diego Traffic Impact Study Manual, Table 2, Page 8, July 1998.

Significance Determination

To determine the project impacts to roadway segments and intersections, the City of San Diego hasdeveloped thresholds based on allowable increases in delay at intersections and volume to capacity (v/c)ratios for roadway segments. At intersections, the Measurement of Effectiveness (MOE) is based onallowable increases in delay. At roadway segments, the MOE is based on allowable increases in the v/cratio. At intersections that are expected to operate at LOS E with the project, the allowable increase in delayis two seconds, while for intersections that are expected to operate at LOS F, the allowable increase in delay


is one second. If vehicle trips from a project cause the delay at an intersection to increase by more than theCity’s threshold, this would be considered a significant project impact that requires mitigation. Under thiscondition, the applicant would be responsible for mitigation to restore the operations of the intersection toLOS D or better. If an existing intersection is operating at LOS E or F, the intersection would be consideredan existing deficiency. Two classes of impacts are measured for significance: Direct Impacts andCumulative Impacts. Direct traffic impacts are those projected to occur at the time a proposed developmentbecomes operational, including other developments not presently operational but which is anticipated to beoperational at that time (Near Term). Cumulative traffic impacts are those projected to occur at some pointafter a proposed development becomes operational, such as during subsequent phases of a project and whenadditional proposed developments in the area become operational (short-term cumulative) or when theaffected community plan area reaches full planned build out (long-term cumulative). The project applicantwould be responsible for mitigating direct impacts by improving the intersection operation to better thanpre-project conditions and identifying the improvements needed to bring the intersection to LOS D or betteroperation. A fair share contribution toward intersection improvements to achieve a LOS D or better couldbe necessary to mitigate cumulative impacts. A fair share contribution is based on the project’sproportionate traffic contribution to the overall traffic volumes entering an intersection.

For roadway segments that are forecasted to operate at LOS E, the allowable increase in v/c ratio is 0.02,while for roadway segments that are forecasted to operate at LOS F, the allowable increase in v/c ratio is0.01. An increase in v/c ratio higher than the City’s thresholds would be considered a significant impact thatrequires mitigation.

In certain instances mitigation may not be required if the roadway segment operates at LOS E or LOS F. Insuch cases the following three conditions must all be met:

1. The roadway is built to its ultimate classification per the community plan;

2. The intersections on both ends of the failing segment operate at an acceptable LOS; and

3. An HCM arterial analysis indicates an acceptable LOS on the segment.

Table 2-4 shows the criteria for determining levels of significance at intersections and roadway segments.Table 2-4 Levels of Significance Criteria for Intersections and Roadway Segments

TABLE 2-4LEVELS OF SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA FOR INTERSECTIONS AND ROADWAY SEGMENTS

Facility Measurement of Effectiveness (MOE) Significance Threshold (a)

Intersection Seconds of delay> 2.0 seconds at LOS E or

> 1.0 seconds at LOS F

Roadway Segment v/c Ratio > 0.02 at LOS E or > 0.01 at LOS F, and adjacentintersections operating at an unacceptable LOS

Notes:Source: City of San Diego Traffic Impact Study Manual, Table 5, July 1998 and California Environmental Quality Act-SignificanceDetermination Thresholds-Development Service Department, January 2007.(a) Significance threshold applies only when the type of facility operates at LOS E or F.

Traffic Impact Analysis Existing ConditionsSan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 3—1 June 2010

3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONSThis section summarizes the existing roadway circulation network, daily and peak-hour traffic volumes, andoperations at the study intersections and roadway segments.

Road Network

The following provides a description of the existing street system within the vicinity of the project area.

East Beyer Boulevard is classified as a 2-lane collector that has a north-south alignment from BeyerBoulevard to East San Ysidro Boulevard. This street is located east of I-805 and I-5 and runs parallel to bothof these facilities. Bike lanes and parking are available on both sides of the street for most of the roadwaysegment. The east side of the street has a curb and gutter. The posted speed limit varies between 35 and 40mph.

East San Ysidro Boulevard is the primary thoroughfare in the San Ysidro community. Within this projectstudy area, East San Ysidro Boulevard is classified as a 4-lane collector from the I-805 Ramps to Center Street.Curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and parking exist. The posted speed limit is 30 mph.

Center Street is a north-south connector between East Beyer Boulevard and East San Ysidro Boulevard. Thisroadway is classified as a 2-lane collector. Parking is allowed along both sides of the street.

Figure 3-1 and 3-2 shows the existing geometrics and functional classification of the study intersections andthe roadway segments within the study area, respectively.

Traffic Volumes

Existing a.m. (7:00 to 9:00 a.m.) and p.m. (4:00 to 6:00 p.m.) peak-hour turning movement counts wereconducted by True Counts at all intersections within the study area with the exception of the I-805 ramps alongEast San Ysidro Boulevard. The turning movement counts at the I-805 ramps and East San Ysidro Boulevardwere provided by National Data & Surveying Services. In addition to the peak-hour turning movement counts,24-hour roadway machine counts were conducted along the roadway segments in the study area. NationalData & Surveying Services conducted roadway segment count along East San Ysidro Boulevard while TrueCounts conducted roadway segment counts along all other roadway segments within the study area.

Figure 3-3 illustrates the existing peak-hour traffic volumes at the study intersections and Figure 3-4illustrates the existing ADT volumes along the roadway segments.

Appendix A contains the existing peak-hour traffic volume data at the study intersections and the existingADT volume data for the roadway segments.

Intersection Analysis

Table 3-1 displays the LOS analysis results for the study intersections under Existing Conditions. As shownin the table, all study intersections operate at LOS C during both peak periods.

Appendix B contains the peak-hour intersections LOS calculation worksheets.

Roadway Segment Analysis

Table 3-2 displays the roadway segments analysis under Existing Conditions. As shown in the table, all studyroadway segments operate at LOS C or better under existing conditions.

NOT TO SCALE

N

FIGURE 3-1 Existing Intersection Geometrics

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Illustrator\Intersection Geometrics.ai

San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement

study int

Street

Street name

Freeway

Ramp

E St

ProjectSite

ProposedExit Only Dwy

Existing Dwy

Camino de la

Pla

za

E. Beyer Blvd

Bolton

Cent

er

St

Hill St

E. San Ysidro Blvd

Border Village Rd

Hall Rd

INTERSTATE

CALIFORNIA

805

INTERSTATE

CALIFORNIA

5

1

2

3

4

56

7

Legend:

ProposedExisting

Unsignalized

SignalizedX

X

1

2

3

4

5

I-805 SB Ramp/E. San Ysidro Blvd

7

I-805 NB Ramp/E. San Ysidro Blvd

6

Center St/E. San Ysidro Blvd

Existing Dwy/E. Beyer Blvd

Bolton Hall Rd/E. Beyer Blvd

Hill St - Center St/E. Beyer Blvd

E. Beyer Blvd/Proposed New Dwy

1 2 3 4

5

STO

P

STOP

STO

P

STOP

STOP

STOP

STOP

STOP

3-2


2-C

2-C

4-C

2-C

2-C

Legend2-C = 2 Lane Collector4-C = 4 Lane Collector

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021RS01.xlsm]ADT Fig (P)\Existing Roadway Geometrics

3—3

FIGURE 3-2

Existing Roadway Geometrics

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / // / / // / / /

/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / // / / // / / /

/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / // / / // / / /

/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /

0

E. Beyer Blvd

7

9 10 11 12

0 0 0 0 0 0

00

0000

00

073

0 0

0

6127

E. San Ysidro Blvd E. San Ysidro Blvd

0 0

3

43

Bol

ton

Hal

l Rd

0

457

45

0 1

51

211 0

20

00

0 0

00

0

287

I-805

SB

Ram

p7

0

318

46 70 226 262 0 0411610 926

00 0

0%

0 0 00 0

365

11 0

390 927

24

0 136

0

74

0E. San Ysidro Blvd

5

00 0

0 0 0

39 107

0

78 0 0 0

6

Cen

ter S

t

76 0 0

0237 452

373

191

0

0 0

5 5

Exis

ting

Dw

y

E. Beyer Blvd

0%

0 0

4

24 74

0

5 0 0

5 00

10 72 0

0 Proposed New Dwy

2

22

3

00 36

0 126

00 0

00

0

Hill

St

E. Beyer Blvd

175

0

360

028

00

00

90 0 0 3 1 2

0

0

22

3 8 4

2 0

54 58

0 00

63 5

Cen

ter S

t1130 4

17

0

656

30

110

311

0 0

0 0 0

00 0

0 0

0 0

0

0 0

0 0

0 00

0

0 0

0

0 00 0

0

0 00

0

0

00 0

0

0

0

0 0

0

0

0 00

0

0 0

0 0000

00

0 00

0 0


E. B

eyer

Blv

d1

0

109

I-805

NB

Ram

p

23 00

8

0 00

0

0

48 4 12

0 0

203

0 0

434

0

00

0 0

0 000 0 00 0

0

200

00 0 187

575118

0 0

0

0

00

0 0

0

0 00

0 00

0

Legend

FIGURE 3-3

Existing Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes

X / Y = AM / PM PEAK HOURTURNING VOLUMES

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021TA01.xlsm]Ex Figure 1-12

3—4 Existing Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes


4,166

4,208

13,348

4,208

1,300

Legend

X,XXX = Average Daily Traffic

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021RS01.xlsm]ADT Fig (P)\Existing ADT Volumes

3—5

FIGURE 3-4

Existing ADT Volumes

EXISTINGINTERSECTION DELAY (a) LOS (b)

AMPMAM 7.6 APM 8.4 AAM 8.9 APM 10.1 BAM 8.5 APM 8.7 AAM 10.4 BPM 14.0 BAM 17.5 BPM 20.6 CAM 14.9 BPM 18.1 B

Notes:

(b) LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual and performed using Synchro 6.0

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021IN01.xlsm]Existing

(a) Delay refers to the average control delay for the entire intersection, measured in seconds per vehicle. At a two-way stop-controlled intersection, delay refers to the worst movement.

All-Way Stop

One-Way Stop

One-Way Stop

One-Way Stop

Actuated-UncoordinatedSignal

Actuated-UncoordinatedSignal

1 Proposed New Dwy & E. Beyer Blvd

2 E. Beyer Blvd & Hill St

TABLE 3-1EXISTING CONDITIONS

PEAK-HOUR INTERSECTION LOS SUMMARY

PEAK HOURTRAFFIC CONTROL

One-Way Stop This intersection does not exist under this scenario

5 E. San Ysidro Blvd & Center St

6 E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 NB Ramp

3 E. Beyer Blvd & Bolton Hall Rd

4 E. Beyer Blvd & Existing Dwy

7 E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 SB Ramp

3—6

ROADWAY SEGMENT ROADWAY CLASSIFICATION (a)LOS E

CAPACITY ADT (b)V/C

RATIO (c) LOS

E. Beyer BlvdProposed Dwy to Center St 2 Lane Collector 8,000 4,166 0.521 CCenter St to Bolton Hall Rd 2 Lane Collector 8,000 4,208 0.526 CBolton Hall Rd to Existing Dwy 2 Lane Collector 8,000 4,208 0.526 CCenter StE.San Ysidro Blvd to E. Beyer Blvd 2 Lane Collector 8,000 1,300 0.163 AE. San Ysidro BlvdI-805 to Center St 4 Lane Collector 30,000 13,348 0.445 BNotes:(a) Existing roads street classification is based on field observations and City of San Diego's roadway classifications.

(c) The v/c Ratio is calculated by dividing the ADT volume by each respective roadway segment's capacity.

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021RS01.xlsm]Existing

TABLE 3-2

ROADWAY SEGMENT LOS SUMMARYEXISTING CONDITIONS

(b) Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes for the roadway segments along E.Beyer Blvd. were provided by True Counts and measured in July 14, 2009. The ADT along Center St. wasestimated based on turning movement counts also collected by True Count in July 2009. The ADT counts along E. San Ysidro Blvd were provided by National Data Services and countedin May 2007.

3-7

Traffic Impact Analysis Project TrafficSan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 4—1 June 2010

4.0 PROJECT TRAFFICThe following section describes the trip generation, distribution and assignment related to the proposedSan Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvements project.

Trip Generation

In order to determine the traffic generation characteristics of the site, seven day machine counts werecollected at the site’s existing driveway. A copy of the 7-day classification counts can be found inAppendix D. The average weekday total daily trip generation was then calculated, in addition to thepeak-hour percentage of the daily and in/out ratios. The traffic counts indicated that the site currentlygenerates an average of 42 daily vehicular trips (21 total vehicles). Half of the vehicular trips arepassenger cars, one third of the trips are heavy trucks and the remaining are small trucks trips. Themorning and afternoon peak-hour generation rates of the site are equal to approximately 14.3 percent ofthe total daily trip generation. The in and out ratios are equal to 50 percent for both the morning andafternoon peak-hour periods. A passenger car equivalent was applied to the small and heavy trucks forthe purpose of the analysis. Table 4-1 summarizes the trip generation for existing site. As shown inTable 4-1, with the passenger car equivalent adjustment the site currently generates a total of 67passenger vehicles daily trips, including 10 (5 in, 5 out) a.m. peak-hour trips, and 10 (5 in, 5 out) p.m.peak-hour trips. The project will include the construction of two new track extensions to the north thatwould provide additional storage capacity, as well as the ability to switch rail cars outside of theconstrained operating windows without interrupting the trolley line. A majority of the capacity increasewithin the yard is intended for throughput operations; however as part of the project, the number oflocations which can be used as docking/unloading spots will increase from 3 spots to approximately 15spots. This increase in docking/unloading spots will allow for an increase of truck traffic coming to theyard to load and unload products. Based on the nature of the products being unloaded from the rail cars,the additional 12 spots will allow for between 3 to 4 truck trips per rail car, and typical unloading patternswill result in an average of 1 to 2 days for unloading per car. Based on the expected unloading rates, thetypical daily additional truck trips expected as a result of this project will be up to 28 truck trips per day.As shown in Table 4-1, with the increase of heavy truck frequency, the total trip generation for the sitewill be equal to 137 passenger cars daily trips, including 20 (10 in, 10 out) a.m. peak-hour trips, and 20(10 in, 10 out) p.m. peak-hour trips. The net traffic generation of the project is equal to 70 passenger cardaily trips, including 10 (5 in, 5 out) a.m. peak-hour trips, and 10 (5 in, 5 out) p.m. peak-hour trips.

Trip Distribution

Project trip distribution for the project is based on the locations of the site’s access points, existing travelpatterns and access to freeway locations. Figures 4-1 and 4-2 display the project assumed distributionsthrough the study intersections and roadway segments during the morning and afternoon peak-hourperiods, respectively. It should be noted that all truck traffic originates at the Otay Border Crossing.Trucks will use Interstate 805 to travel from the Otay to the San Ysidro Area. They will exit at the EastSan Ysidro interchange and use Center Street to access the site via East Beyer Boulevard. Figure 4-3shows the anticipated truck route with the modification of the access point to the site.

Trip Assignment

Based on the project trip distributions, daily, a.m. and p.m. peak-hour project trips were assigned to thelocal roadway network and through the study intersections. Figure 4-4 shows the project trip assignmentat the study intersections and Figure 4-5 shows the project trip assignment along the roadway segments.

Lan

d U

seD

aily

Tri

ps1

Perc

ent o

fve

hicl

es1

Num

ber

ofT

ruck

sPa

ssen

ger

Car

Equ

ival

ent (

PCE

)A

M %

of

Tot

al1

In:O

ut R

atio

InO

utT

otal

PM %

of

Tot

al1

In:O

ut R

atio

InO

utT

otal

Prop

osed

Truc

k D

istrib

utio

n Fa

cilit

y70

Pass

enge

r Car

s21

30.0

%1.

021

Truc

k - T

otal

49

Smal

l Tru

ck10

.0%

71.

511

Larg

e Tr

ucks

60.0

%42

2.5

105

Subt

otal

7013

7

Prop

osed

Tot

al70

137

14.3

0%0.

50:

0.50

1010

2014

.30%

0.50

:0.

5010

1020

Exi

stin

g

Truc

k D

istrib

utio

n Fa

cilit

y42

Pass

enge

r Car

s21

50.0

%1.

021

Truc

k - T

otal

21

Smal

l Tru

ck16

.7%

71.

511

Larg

e Tr

ucks

33.3

%14

2.5

35

Subt

otal

4267

Exi

stin

g T

otal

4267

14.3

0%0.

50:

0.50

55

1014

.30%

0.50

:0.

505

510

NE

T IN

CR

EA

SE (P

RO

POSE

D M

INU

S E

XIS

TIN

G, T

OT

AL

) =70

55

105

510

Not

e:

K:\S

ND

_TR

AN

S\09

5596

020\

San

Ysi

dro

Yar

d Tr

affic

Stu

dy\E

xcel

\[526

021T

G01

.xls

m]T

ruck

s by

Axl

e

1. T

he to

tal d

aily

trip

s, ve

hicl

e cl

assi

ficat

ion

and

peak

-hou

r trip

gen

erat

ion

rate

s wer

e ba

sed

on ro

adw

ay m

achi

ne c

ount

s pla

ced

at th

e ex

istin

g si

te's

entra

nce

durin

g a

perio

d of

seve

n co

nsec

utiv

e da

ys.

The

coun

ts w

ere

take

n in

July

200

9.

PM P

eak-

Hou

r

TABL

E 4-

1 T

RIP

GE

NE

RA

TIO

N S

UM

MA

RY

Hea

vy V

ehic

le A

djus

tmen

t

Tot

al w

ithA

djus

tmen

t

AM

Pea

k-H

our

4-2

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / /

/ / / /

/ / / /

/ / / /

/ / / /

/ / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / /

/ / / /

/ / / /

/ / / /

/ / / /

/ / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / /

/ / / /

/ / / /

/ / / /

/ / / /

/ / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

0% 0% 0%0% 0%0%

0% 0%

0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0%

0% 0%0% 0% 0%

0% 0% 0% 0%0% 0%

0% 0%0% 0%

(0%) 0%(0%) 0% (0%) 0% (0%) 0%

0%(0%) 0% (0%) 0% (0%) 0% (0%) 0%

(0%) 0%

(0%

)(0

%)

(0%

) (0%)

(0%

)(0

%) (0%) 0%

(0%

)(0

%)

0% 0% 0%

(0%

)(0

%)

(0%

) (0%) 0%

(0%

)

0% 0% 0% 0%(0

%)

9 10 11 12

0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

0% 0% 0%0% 0%0%

0% 100%

0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

0% 0%0% 0%

I-805

SB

Ram

p 0% 0%0% 0%

0% 0%0% 0% 0%

0% 100% 0% 0%0% 0%

0% 0%0% 0%

(0%) 0%E. San Ysidro Blvd E. San Ysidro Blvd E. San Ysidro Blvd

(0%) 0% (0%) 0% (0%) 0%

0%(0%) 0% (0%) 0% (0%) 0% (0%) 0%

(0%) 0%

(0%

)(0

%)

(0%

) (0%)

(0%

)(0

%) (100%) 0%

(0%

)(0

%)

0% 0% 0%

(100

%)

(0%

)(0

%) (0%) 0%

(0%

)

0%

I-805

NB

Ram

p

0% 0% (0%

)

I-805

SB

Ram

p

100%

5 6 7 8

0% 0% 0%

Cen

ter S

t 0% 0%

0% 0% 0%0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

0% 0% 0%0% 0%0%

0% 0%

0% 0% 100%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0%

0% 0%0% 0%

Bol

ton

Hal

l Rd 0% 100%

0% 100%

0% 0%0% 0% 0%

0% 0% 0% 0%

Cen

ter S

t0% 0%0% 0%0% 0%

0%

(0%) 0%Proposed New Dwy E. Beyer Blvd E. Beyer Blvd E. Beyer Blvd

(0%) 0% (100%) 0% (0%) 0%

(0%

) 0%(0%) 0% (0%) 0% (100%) 0% (0%) 0%

(0%) 0%

(100

%)

(0%

)(0

%) (0%)

(0%

)(0

%)

(0%

) (0%) 0%

(0%

)

0%

San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement Project1 2 3 4

0% 0% 0%

E. B

eyer

Blv

d

0% 0%

Exis

ting

Dw

y

(0%

)(0

%)

(0%

) (0%) 0%

0% 0%

Hill

St 0% 0% 0%

(0%

)

X% / (Y%) = IN / OUT PERCENTDISTRIBUTION

#N/A

Existing Project Trip Distribution - Study Intersections

Legend

Existing Project Trip Distribution - Study Intersections#N/AK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021TA01.xlsm]Dist 1-12 (Existing)

4-3


50%

50%

100%

50%

100%

Legend

Project Trip Distribution

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021RS01.xlsm]ADT Fig (P)\Project Trip Distribution-Roadway Segments

4—4

FIGURE 4-2

Project Trip Distribution-Roadway Segments

NOT TO SCALE

FIGURE 4-3Heavy Truck Trip Distribution

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Illustrator\traffic distribution,ai


study int

Street

Street name

Freeway

Ramp

E St

ProjectSite

ProposedExit Only Dwy

Existing Dwy

Camino de la

Pla

za

E. Beyer Blvd

Bolton

Cent

er

St

Hill St

E. San Ysidro Blvd

Border Village Rd

Hall Rd

INTERSTATE

CALIFORNIA

805

INTERSTATE

CALIFORNIA

5

Legend:

Exiting Truck Trips

Entering Truck Trips

4-5

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / // / / // / / /

/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / // / / // / / /

/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / // / / // / / /

/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /


E. B

eyer

Blv

d1

00

100 0

0

E. San Ysidro Blvd

0

0

0

10

0 10

10 10

00

0 0

E. San Ysidro Blvd0

000

00 0 0

6

0 0

0 0

0

000

0 0

0 0

0 00 00

00

0

0

0 0

00

0 0

0 0 0

0

0

0

0

0

00 00

0 0

0

0 00

0 00

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 0

0 0 0

0 0

0 0

0

0 0

000

9 10

0 0

00 0

0 0 0

0

0 00 0 0

0

Proposed New Dwy

2

00

00

0

0

00 0 00

0

Hill

St

E. Beyer Blvd

0 00 0 00

0

0

0

0

00 0

3

0

Bol

ton

Hal

l Rd

0

0

00

E. Beyer Blvd

00

0 00

00

0

0 0

10 10

Exis

ting

Dw

y

E. Beyer Blvd

0%

0 00 0

0

0 0 0

0 0

4

10 0 0

0

0

10

5

00 0

0 0 0

0 0

0 0

Cen

ter S

t

0

0 0

0 00

00 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0

8

0 0

00

I-805

SB

Ram

p

0 0

10

I-805

NB

Ram

p

0

10

0

0 0

00 0

0 0 00 0 0

010

0 0

1010 10 0 0 0 0

00 0

0 00

0

0

0

0 0

0

10

10

7

0

00

0

00 0 10 010

0 000

10

Cen

ter S

t

0

0

0

0

11 12

00

E. San Ysidro Blvd

0

0 0

0

000

0 0

0

0

0 0

0 0 0 00 0 0 0

0 00 0

0


Legend

FIGURE 4-4

Project Trip Assignment-Study IntersectionsK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021TA01.xlsm]Proj Assign Figure 1-12

4—6 Project Trip Assignment-Study Intersections


68

68

137

68

137

Legend


K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021RS01.xlsm]ADT Fig (P)\Project Trip Assignment - Roadway Segments

4—7

FIGURE 4-5

Project Trip Assignment - Roadway Segments

Traffic Impact Analysis Near Term ConditionsSan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 5—1 June 2010

5.0 NEAR TERM CONDITIONSThis section provides a description of near term conditions with the addition of the proposed projecttraffic.

Road Network

No roadway network changes are assumed to take place under the near term scenario.

Cumulative Projects

Discussions with City staff and research for other on-going traffic studies in the project vicinity identifiedthat there are not major projects that would need to be included in this study.

Traffic Volumes

Traffic volumes for the near term baseline condition were equal to the existing traffic volumes. Inaddition, the proposed project traffic was added to the Near Term Baseline traffic volumes to estimate theNear Term with Project conditions.

Figures 5-1 through 5-4 show the peak-hour and ADT volumes with and without the project.


Table 5-1 displays the LOS analysis results for the study intersections under the Near Term with andwithout project scenarios. As shown in the table, all study intersections operate at LOS C or better duringboth peak periods with and without the proposed project.



Table 5-2 displays the roadway segments analysis under Near Term Conditions. As shown in the table,all study roadway segments will continue to operate at LOS C or better with and without the addition ofthe proposed project.

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / // / / // / / /

/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / // / / // / / /

/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / // / / // / / /

/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /

0000 0

0

0 0

0

136

74

311

457

0

0

0

0

0

0


E. B

eyer

Blv

d1

0

109

I-805

NB

Ram

p

23 0434

0

000

0

452

48 4 12

0 000

0

0

0

8

0 00

00 0

0 00

0

0 0

0 0

00

00 0

0

0 00

0 0

0

0 0

0

00

0 0 00

0

0 00

0 00 0

0 0

0 0

0 000 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

00 0

3 8 4

2

0

0 90 0 0 3 1

0

00

Proposed New Dwy

0 0113

0 4

17

22

Hill

St

E. Beyer Blvd

27

2

175

0

360

00

0

0 0

7

00 36

0 126

00

E. Beyer Blvd

2

0

63 5

073

0

61

028

00

22

3

0 0

5 5

Exis

ting

Dw

y

E. Beyer Blvd

0 024 74

0

5 0 0

5 0

4

5

00 0

0 0 0

39 107

0 00 54 58

0 0 200

Bol

ton

Hal

l Rd

010 72 0 Cen

ter S

t

0 0

46 70 226 262 0 0 0

0 1910 I-805

SB

Ram

p7

78 0 0 0

6

Cen

ter S

t

76 0 0

0

610 926

00 0

0

E. San Ysidro Blvd

0

365 65600

0 0


030

110

411

11 0

0

390 927

0 0

00 0 187

575118

237

0 00

00

0 0 0

45

0 1

5120

4

287

0 0

00

0

373

211 0 02

203

318 0

3

43

9 10 11 12

0 0 00 0

000

0

0 0 0

0 00

0

0

FIGURE 5-1

Near Term Baseline PeaK Hour Traffic Volumes


Legend

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021TA01.xlsm]NT Figure 1-12

Near Term Baseline PeaK Hour Traffic Volumes5—2


4,166

4,208

13,348

4,208

1,300

Legend


K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021RS01.xlsm]ADT Fig (P)\Near Term Baseline ADT Volumes

5—3

FIGURE 5-2

Near Term Baseline ADT Volumes

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / // / / // / / /

/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / // / / // / / /

/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / // / / // / / /

/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /

0

E. Beyer Blvd

2

9 10 11 12

0 0 0 0 0 0

00

0000

00

068

0 0

0

6122


0 0

3

48

Bol

ton

Hal

l Rd

0

462

45

0 1

51

216 0

20

00

0 0

00

0

287

I-805

SB

Ram

p7

0

318

51 75 226 262 0 0411610 926

00 0

0 0 00 0

370

11 0

390 927

24

0 136

0

74

0E. San Ysidro Blvd

5

00 0

0 0 0

39 107

0

83 0 0 0

6

Cen

ter S

t

81 0 0

0237 452

378

191

0

0 0

10 10

Exis

ting

Dw

y

E. Beyer Blvd

0 0

4

24 74

0

0 0 0

0 00

10 72 0

Proposed New Dwy

2

22

3

00 36

0 126

00 0

00

0

Hill

St

E. Beyer Blvd

175

0

360

023

00

100

90 0 0 3 1 2

10

0

22

3 8 4

2 0

64 68

0 00

63 5

Cen

ter S

t1130 4

22

0

661

30

110

311

0 0

0 0 0

00 0

0 0

0 0

0

0 0

0 0

0 00

0

0 0

0

0 00 0

0

0 00

0

0

00 0

0

0

0

0 0

0

0

0 00

0

0 0

0 0000

00

0 00

0 0


E. B

eyer

Blv

d1

0

114

I-805

NB

Ram

p

23 00

8

0 00

0

0

48 4 17

0 0

203

0 0

434

0

00

0 0

0 000 0 00 0

0

200

00 0 192

575118

0 0

0

0

00

0 0

0

0 00

0 00

0

Legend

FIGURE 5-3

Near Term with Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes


K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021TA01.xlsm]NTWP Figure 1-12

5—4 Near Term with Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes


4,234

4,209

13,418

4,209

1,370

Legend


K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021RS01.xlsm]ADT Fig (P)\Near Term with Project ADT Volumes

5—5

FIGURE 5-4

Near Term with Project ADT Volumes

NEAR TERM BASELINENEAR TERM PLUS

PROJECT

INTERSECTION DELAY (a) LOS (b) DELAY (a) LOS (b) (c) SIGNIFICANT?AM 9.7 A 9.7 NOPM 11.5 B 11.5 NOAM 7.6 A 7.6 A 0.0 NOPM 8.4 A 8.4 A 0.0 NOAM 8.9 A 9.0 A 0.1 NOPM 10.1 B 10.1 B 0.0 NOAM 8.5 A 1.6 A -6.9 NOPM 8.7 A 0.7 A -8.0 NOAM 10.4 B 10.5 B 0.1 NOPM 14.0 B 14.2 B 0.2 NOAM 17.5 B 17.5 B 0.0 NOPM 20.6 C 20.6 C 0.0 NOAM 14.9 B 15.1 B 0.2 NOPM 18.1 B 18.1 B 0.0 NO

Notes:

(b) LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual and performed using Synchro 6.0(c) Change in delay due to addition of project traffic

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021IN01.xlsm]Near-Term

TABLE 5-1NEAR TERM CONDITIONS


PEAKHOUR


This intersection does notexist under this scenario








K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021IN01.xlsm]Near-Term

5—6

AD

TV

/CR

ATI

O (a

)L

OS

AD

TV

/CR

ATI

O (a

)L

OS

E. B

eyer

Blv

dPr

opos

ed D

wy

to C

ente

r St

2 La

ne C

olle

ctor

8,00

04,

166

0.52

1C

4,23

40.

529

C0.

008

NO

Cen

ter S

t to

Bol

ton

Hal

l Rd

2 La

ne C

olle

ctor

8,00

04,

208

0.52

6C

4,20

90.

526

C0.

000

NO

Bol

ton

Hal

l Rd

to E

xist

ing

Dw

y2

Lane

Col

lect

or8,

000

4,20

80.

526

C4,

209

0.52

6C

0.00

0N

OC

ente

r St

E.Sa

n Y

sidr

o B

lvd

to E

. Bey

er B

lvd

2 La

ne C

olle

ctor

8,00

01,

300

0.16

3A

1,37

00.

171

A0.

008

NO

E. S

an Y

sidr

o B

lvd

I-805

to C

ente

r St

4 La

ne C

olle

ctor

30,0

0013

,348

0.44

5B

13,4

180.

447

B0.

002

NO

Not

es:

(a) T

he v

/c R

atio

is c

alcu

late

d by

div

idin

g th

e A

DT

volu

me

by e

ach

resp

ectiv

e ro

adw

ay se

gmen

t's c

apac

ity.

K:\S

ND

_TR

AN

S\09

5596

020\

San

Ysi

dro

Yar

d Tr

affic

Stu

dy\E

xcel

\[526

021R

S01.

xlsm

]201

0

RO

AD

WA

Y S

EGM

EN

T

NE

AR

TE

RM

CO

ND

ITIO

NS

TAB

LE 5

-2

in V

/CSI

GN

IFIC

AN

T?

LO

S E

CA

PAC

ITY

NEA

R T

ERM

BA

SEL

INE

NEA

R T

ERM

PLU

S PR

OJE

CT

RO

AD

WA

Y SE

GM

EN

T LO

S SU

MM

AR

Y

RO

AD

WA

YC

LA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

N

5-7

Traffic Impact Analysis 2030 Horizon Year ConditionsSan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 6—1 June 2010

6.0 2030 HORIZON YEAR CONDITIONSThis section provides a description of the 2030 Horizon Year with the addition of the proposed project.

Road Network

No roadway network changes are assumed to take place under the Horizon Year scenario.

Traffic Volumes

The Horizon Year Average Daily Traffic volumes on the roadway segments in the study area weredetermined from SANDAG’s 2030 Regional Transportation Plan (Mobility 2030) and the Final 2030Regional Growth Forecast. To estimate the Horizon Year turning movement volumes at the studyintersections, the existing turning movements at each respective study intersection were factored up basedon the projected ADT volumes along each approach. A copy of the Year 2030 SANDAG forecast plotand worksheet calculations to estimate the future turning movements can be found in Appendix C.

Figures 6-1 illustrates the 2030 Horizon Year Baseline peak-hour traffic volumes at the studyintersections, while Figure 6-2 presents the 2030 Horizon Year Baseline ADT volumes along theroadway segments.

To determine the traffic volumes under the 2030 Horizon Year with the project scenario, the tripsassociated with the project were added to the 2030 Horizon Year Baseline volumes at the studyintersections and roadway segments. Figures 6-3 illustrates the Horizon Year with the project’s peak-hour traffic volumes at the study intersections, while Figure 6-4 presents the 2030 Horizon Year with theproject’s ADT volumes along the roadway segments.


Table 6-1 displays the LOS analysis results for the study intersections under the Horizon Year with andwithout project scenarios. As shown in the table, all study intersections will operate at LOS D or betterduring both peak periods with and without the proposed project.



Table 6-2 displays the roadway segments analysis under 2030 Horizon Year Scenario. As shown in thetable, under Horizon Year scenario, East Beyer Boulevard is expected to operate at LOS F. The additionof the project traffic will not exceed the City of San Diego’s threshold for determining significance andthe project is not considered to have a significant cumulative impact along this roadway segment. Allother study roadway segments will operate at LOS D or better with and without the addition of theproposed project.

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / // / / // / / /

/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / // / / // / / /

/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / // / / // / / /

/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /

0000 0

0

0 0

0

102

67

379

575

0

0

0

0

0

0


E. B

eyer

Blv

d1

0

197

I-805

NB

Ram

p

119 0629

0

000

0

698

120 6 7

0 000

0

0

0

8

0 00

00 0

0 00

0

0 0

0 0

00

00 0

0

0 00

0 0

0

0 0

0

00

0 0 00

0

0 00

0 00 0

0 0

0 0

0 000 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

00 0

11 9 6

5

0

025

3 0 0 3 3

0

00

Proposed New Dwy

0 0372

0 10

22

91

Hill

St

E. Beyer Blvd

35

2

517

0

5232

00

0

0 0

6

00 138

0 382

00

E. Beyer Blvd

4

0

139

5

0127

0

5010

057

00

81

3

0 0

3 3

Exis

ting

Dw

y

E. Beyer Blvd

0 064 174

0

3 0 0

3 0

4

5

00 0

0 0 0

84 227

0 00 115 135

0 0 197

Bol

ton

Hal

l Rd

040

216 0 Cen

ter S

t

0 0

80 125 218 202 0 0 0

0 2130 I-805

SB

Ram

p7

148

0 0 0

6

Cen

ter S

t

142 0 0

0

610 1270

00 0

0

E. San Ysidro Blvd

0

561 101600

0 0


020

129

587

30 0

0

448 1125

0 0

00 0 231

855119

359

0 00

00

0 0 0

47

0 6

18774

3

410

0 0

00

0

413

230 0 02

218

316 0

33

81

9 10 11 12

0 0 00 0

000

0

0 0 0

0 00

0

0

FIGURE 6-1

Horizon Year Baseline Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes


Legend

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021TA01.xlsm]BO Figure 1-12

Horizon Year Baseline Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes6—2


8,900

8,942

20,000

9,600

2,500

Legend


K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021RS01.xlsm]ADT Fig (P)\Horizon Year Baseline ADT Volumes

6—3

FIGURE 6-2

Horizon Year Baseline ADT Volumes

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / // / / // / / /

/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / // / / // / / /

/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / / / / / / / / / /

/ / / // / / // / / /

/ / / // / / // / / // / / / / / / / / / / /

0

E. Beyer Blvd

1

9 10 11 12

0 0 0 0 0 0

00

0000

00

0122

0 0

0

501030


0 0

33

86

Bol

ton

Hal

l Rd

0

580

47

0 6

187

235 0

74

00

0 0

00

0

410

I-805

SB

Ram

p7

0

316

85 130 218 202 0 0587610 1270

00 0

0 0 00 0

566

30 0

448 1125

23

0 102

0

67

0E. San Ysidro Blvd

5

00 0

0 0 0

84 227

0

153

0 0 0

6

Cen

ter S

t

147 0 0

0359 698

418

213

0

0 0

8 8

Exis

ting

Dw

y

E. Beyer Blvd

0 0

4

64 174

0

-2 0 0

-2 00

4021

6 0

Proposed New Dwy

2

81

3

00 138

0 382

00 0

00

0

Hill

St

E. Beyer Blvd

517

0

5232

052

00

10025

3 0 0 3 3 4

10

0

91

11 9 6

5 0

125 145

0 00

139

5

Cen

ter S

t3720 10

27

0

1021

20

129

379

0 0

0 0 0

00 0

0 0

0 0

0

0 0

0 0

0 00

0

0 0

0

0 00 0

0

0 00

0

0

00 0

0

0

0

0 0

0

0

0 00

0

0 0

0 0000

00

0 00

0 0


E. B

eyer

Blv

d1

0

202

I-805

NB

Ram

p

119 00

8

0 00

0

0

120 6 12

0 0

218

0 0

629

0

00

0 0

0 000 0 00 0

0

197

00 0 236

855119

0 0

0

0

00

0 0

0

0 00

0 00

0

Legend

FIGURE 6-3


K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021TA01.xlsm]BOWP Figure 1-12

6—4 Horizon Year with Project Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes


8,968

8,943

20,070

9,601

2,570

Legend


K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021RS01.xlsm]ADT Fig (P)\Horizon Year with Project ADT Volumes

6—5

FIGURE 6-4

Horizon Year with Project ADT Volumes

HORIZON YEARBASELINE

HORIZON YEAR PLUSPROJECT

INTERSECTION DELAY (a) LOS (b) DELAY (a) LOS (b) (c) SIGNIFICANT?AM 13.0 B 13.0 NOPM 27.8 D 27.8 NOAM 10.0 B 10.1 B 0.1 NOPM 23.7 C 24.9 C 1.2 NOAM 9.8 A 9.8 A 0.0 NOPM 15.5 C 15.5 C 0.0 NOAM 8.8 A 0.7 A -8.1 NOPM 9.3 A 0.3 A -9.0 NOAM 11.9 B 12.0 B 0.1 NOPM 22.5 C 23.1 C 0.6 NOAM 18.6 B 18.6 B 0.0 NOPM 39.1 D 39.7 D 0.6 NOAM 16.1 B 16.1 B 0.0 NOPM 20.0 C 20.0 C 0.0 NO

Notes:

(b) LOS calculations are based on the methodology outlined in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual and performed using Synchro 6.0(c) Change in delay due to addition of project traffic

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021IN01.xlsm]Build-Out

TABLE 6-1HORIZON YEAR CONDITIONS


PEAKHOUR


This intersection does notexist under this scenario








K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Excel\[526021IN01.xlsm]Build-Out

6—6

AD

TV

/CR

AT

IO (a

)L

OS

AD

TV

/CR

AT

IO (a

)L

OS

E. B

eyer

Blv

dPr

opos

ed D

wy

to C

ente

r St

2 La

ne C

olle

ctor

8,00

08,

900

1.11

3F

8,96

81.

121

F0.

008

NO

Cen

ter S

t to

Bol

ton

Hal

l Rd

2 La

ne C

olle

ctor

8,00

08,

942

1.11

8F

8,94

31.

118

F0.

000

NO

Bol

ton

Hal

l Rd

to E

xist

ing

Dw

y2

Lane

Col

lect

or8,

000

9,60

01.

200

F9,

601

1.20

0F

0.00

0N

OC

ente

r St

E.Sa

n Y

sidr

o B

lvd

to E

. Bey

er B

lvd

2 La

ne C

olle

ctor

8,00

02,

500

0.31

3B

2,57

00.

321

B0.

008

NO

E. S

an Y

sidr

o B

lvd

I-805

to C

ente

r St

4 La

ne C

olle

ctor

30,0

0020

,000

0.66

7D

20,0

700.

669

D0.

002

NO

Not

es:

(a) T

he v

/c R

atio

is c

alcu

late

d by

div

idin

g th

e A

DT

volu

me

by ea

ch re

spec

tive

road

way

segm

ent's

cap

acity

.

K:\S

ND

_TR

AN

S\09

5596

020\

San

Ysi

dro

Yar

d Tr

affic

Stu

dy\E

xcel

\[526

021R

S01.

xlsm

]203

0

HO

RIZ

ON

YE

AR

CO

ND

ITIO

NS

TAB

LE 6

-2

in V

/CSI

GN

IFIC

AN

T?L

OS

EC

APA

CIT

Y

HO

RIZ

ON

YEA

R B

ASE

LIN

EH

OR

IZO

N Y

EAR

PLU

S PR

OJE

CT

RO

AD

WA

Y SE

GM

EN

T LO

S SU

MM

AR

Y

RO

AD

WA

YC

LA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

NR

OA

DW

AY

SEG

MEN

T

6-7

Traffic Impact Analysis Other IssuesSan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 7—1 June 2010

7.0 OTHER ISSUESThe following section discusses other traffic related issues related to the proposed project.

Site Access and On-site circulation

The proposed project will have access along the north side of East Beyer Boulevard just east of BoltonHall Road via an existing driveway. The project traffic will exit the site using a new driveway proposedto be constructed along the east side of East Beyer Boulevard, just north of the railroad crossing bridge.The on-site circulation for the project site was found to be adequate to accommodate vehiclesentrance/exits to the site.

Sight Distance

Speed data was collected along East Beyer Boulevard at the location of the proposed driveway by TrueCounts on Tuesday July 14, 2009. A copy of the speed survey data can be found in Appendix E. Thespeed survey indicates that the prevailing speed along East Beyer Boulevard for vehicles traveling in thenorthbound direction is 38 miles per hour while the prevailing speed for the southbound direction is 41miles per hour. Per Table 405.1A of Caltrans Highway Design Manual, the minimum corner sightdistance for the proposed new driveway measured as indicated in Section 405.1 of the same manualshould be 440 feet for both directions of traffic. Field sight distance measurements were taken at theproposed project driveway along the east side of East Beyer Boulevard. To the north of the proposedproject driveway, the corner sight distance exceeds the minimum 440 feet required. To the south of theproposed project driveway, the existing railroad bridge overpass across East Beyer Boulevard limits thecorner sight visibility to less than the minimum required by Caltran’s Highway Design Manual. TheHighway Design Manual indicates that when the minimum corner sight distance cannot be obtained dueto restrictive conditions, the minimum value of corner sight distance for unsignalized intersections shallbe equal to the stopping sight distance as given in Table 201.1 of Caltran’s Highway Design Manual. PerTable 201.1 the minimum stopping sight distance for 40 miles per hour road is 300 feet. The proposeddriveway location will meet the minimum stopping sight distance as required by Caltrans HighwayDesign Manual Table 201.1 for both directions of traffic. Figure 7-1 illustrates the sight distanceevaluation.

NOT TO SCALE

N

300’ south of proposednew driveway (minimumstoppping sight distance)

Legend:

Line of Minimum Stopping Sight Distance

Minimum Corner Sight Distance

I-805 NB

proposed newdriveway

440’ north of proposednew driveway (minimum

corner sight distance)

existingrailroad overpass

440’ south of proposednew driveway (minimum

corner sight distance)

existingobstruction

I-805 SB

E. BEYER BLVD

FIGURE 7-1Sight Distance Evaluation

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Illustrator\Site Visibility,ai


7-2

Traffic Impact Analysis Findings and ConclusionsSan Ysidro Railroad YardImprovement Project 8—1 June 2010

8.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONSThe following section provides a summary of the key findings and study recommendations and includes asummary table that compares the results from the different scenarios.

Summary of Intersection Analyses

Table 8-1 displays the peak-hour LOS at all the study intersections for the different scenarios analyzed.As shown in the table, all intersections would operate at LOS D or better during all peak periods under allscenarios.

Summary of Roadway Segment Analyses

Table 8-2 displays the LOS at all the study roadway segments for the different scenarios analyzed. Asshown in the table, under Horizon Year scenario, East Beyer Boulevard is expected to operate at LOS F.The addition of the project traffic will not exceed the City of San Diego’s threshold for determiningsignificance and the project is not considered to have a significant cumulative impact along this roadwaysegment. All other study roadway segments will operate at LOS D or better with and without the additionof the proposed project under all scenarios.

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Reports\596020rp01.doc

EX

IST

ING

NE

AR

TE

RM

BA

SEL

INE

NE

AR

TE

RM

PL

US

PRO

JEC

TH

OR

IZO

N Y

EA

RB

ASE

LIN

EH

OR

IZO

N Y

EA

R P

LU

SPR

OJE

CT

INT

ER

SEC

TIO

ND

EL

AY

(a)

LO

S (b

)D

EL

AY

(a)

LO

S (b

)D

EL

AY

(a)

LO

S (b

)D

EL

AY

(a)

LO

S (b

)D

EL

AY

(a)

LO

S (b

)

AM

9.7

A13

.0B

PM11

.5B

27.8

DA

M7.

6A

7.6

A7.

6A

10.0

B10

.1B

PM8.

4A

8.4

A8.

4A

23.7

C24

.9C

AM

8.9

A8.

9A

9.0

A9.

8A

9.8

APM

10.1

B10

.1B

10.1

B15

.5C

15.5

CA

M8.

5A

8.5

A1.

6A

8.8

A0.

7A

PM8.

7A

8.7

A0.

7A

9.3

A0.

3A

AM

10.4

B10

.4B

10.5

B11

.9B

12.0

BPM

14.0

B14

.0B

14.2

B22

.5C

23.1

CA

M17

.5B

17.5

B17

.5B

18.6

B18

.6B

PM20

.6C

20.6

C20

.6C

39.1

D39

.7D

AM

14.9

B14

.9B

15.1

B16

.1B

16.1

BPM

18.1

B18

.1B

18.1

B20

.0C

20.0

CN

otes

:

K:\S

ND

_TR

AN

S\09

5596

020\

San

Ysi

dro

Yar

d Tr

affic

Stu

dy\E

xcel

\[526

021I

N01

.xls

m]S

umm

ary

This

inte

rsec

tion

does

not

exis

t und

er th

is s

cena

rioTh

is in

ters

ectio

n do

es n

otex

ist u

nder

this

sce

nario

This

inte

rsec

tion

does

not

exis

t und

er th

is s

cena

rio

TAB

LE 8

-1SU

MM

AR

Y O

F P

EA

K-H

OU

R IN

TER

SEC

TIO

N L

OS

RE

SULT

S

PEA

KH

OU

R

5E.

San

Ysi

dro

Blv

d &

Cen

ter S

t

6E.

San

Ysi

dro

Blv

d &

I-80

5 N

B R

amp

3E.

Bey

er B

lvd

& B

olto

n H

all R

d

4E.

Bey

er B

lvd

& E

xist

ing

Dw

y

1Pr

opos

ed N

ew D

wy

& E

. Bey

er B

lvd

2E.

Bey

er B

lvd

& H

ill S

t

7E.

San

Ysi

dro

Blv

d &

I-80

5 SB

Ram

p

(a) D

elay

refe

rs to

the

aver

age

cont

rol d

elay

for t

he e

ntire

inte

rsec

tion,

mea

sure

d in

seco

nds p

er v

ehic

le.

At a

two-

way

stop

-con

trolle

d in

ters

ectio

n, d

elay

refe

rs to

the

wor

st m

ovem

ent.

(b) L

OS

calc

ulat

ions

are

bas

ed o

n th

e m

etho

dolo

gy o

utlin

ed in

the

2000

Hig

hway

Cap

acity

Man

ual

and

perf

orm

ed u

sing

Syn

chro

6.0

8-2

AD

TL

OS

AD

TL

OS

AD

TL

OS

AD

TL

OS

AD

TL

OS

E. B

eyer

Blv

dPr

opos

ed D

wy

to C

ente

r St

2 La

ne C

olle

ctor

8,00

04,

166

C4,

166

C4,

234

C8,

900

F8,

968

FC

ente

r St t

o Bo

lton

Hal

l Rd

2 La

ne C

olle

ctor

8,00

04,

208

C4,

208

C4,

209

C8,

942

F8,

943

FBo

lton

Hal

l Rd

to E

xist

ing

Dw

y2

Lane

Col

lect

or8,

000

4,20

8C

4,20

8C

4,20

9C

9,60

0F

9,60

1F

Cen

ter

StE.

San

Ysid

ro B

lvd

to E

. Bey

er B

lvd

2 La

ne C

olle

ctor

8,00

01,

300

A1,

300

A1,

370

A2,

500

B2,

570

BE

. San

Ysi

dro

Blvd

I-805

to C

ente

r St

4 La

ne C

olle

ctor

30,0

0013

,348

B13

,348

B13

,418

B20

,000

D20

,070

DN

otes

:B

old

valu

es in

dica

te ro

adw

ay se

gmen

ts o

pera

ting

at L

OS

E or

F.

(a) T

he v

/c R

atio

is c

alcu

late

d by

div

idin

g th

e A

DT

volu

me

by ea

ch re

spec

tive

road

way

segm

ent's

cap

acity

.

K:\S

ND

_TR

AN

S\09

5596

020\

San

Ysid

ro Y

ard

Traf

fic S

tudy

\Exc

el\[5

2602

1RS0

1.xl

sm]S

umm

ary

SUM

MA

RY

OF

RO

AD

WA

Y SE

GM

EN

T LO

S R

ESU

LTS

TAB

LE 8

-2

LO

S E

CA

PAC

ITY

EX

IST

ING

NE

AR

TE

RM

PL

US

PRO

JEC

TR

OA

DW

AY

CLA

SSIF

ICA

TIO

NR

OA

DW

AY

SE

GM

EN

T

NE

AR

TE

RM

BA

SEL

INE

HO

RIZ

ON

YEA

RB

ASE

LIN

EH

OR

IZO

N Y

EAR

PLU

S PR

OJE

CT

8-3

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A

Existing Traffic Volumes Data

True Count3401 First Ave #123

San Diego, CA 92103

File Name : 9071.03.CENTER ST.BEYER BLVDSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 7/22/2009Page No : 1

Groups Printed- VehiclesCENTER STSouthbound

BEYER BLVDWestbound

CENTER STNorthbound

BEYER BLVDEastbound

Start Time Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Left Thru Right Peds Int. Total

07:00 1 1 0 1 0 5 0 1 8 1 1 4 0 6 10 0 3907:15 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 5 16 2 4007:30 0 3 0 1 3 3 0 0 7 1 1 0 1 10 13 2 4507:45 0 1 0 1 4 10 1 2 15 0 1 2 0 10 19 1 67Total 3 6 0 5 7 21 1 3 38 3 3 6 1 31 58 5 191

08:00 0 1 0 0 2 4 1 0 8 1 2 1 0 11 16 1 4808:15 1 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 13 2 7 0 0 6 9 0 4208:30 0 0 1 0 1 6 0 2 12 1 2 2 0 9 10 2 4808:45 0 2 0 0 2 5 0 1 10 0 3 0 0 20 16 0 59Total 1 4 2 0 5 17 1 3 43 4 14 3 0 46 51 3 197

*** BREAK ***

16:00 1 2 1 0 3 17 0 1 19 0 7 1 0 26 14 3 9516:15 1 1 0 0 8 16 0 0 17 4 7 1 1 26 12 1 9516:30 2 1 0 0 6 12 2 2 10 2 7 1 1 31 19 1 9716:45 0 3 0 1 5 16 1 2 13 3 7 0 0 27 11 0 89Total 4 7 1 1 22 61 3 5 59 9 28 3 2 110 56 5 376

17:00 1 4 0 0 8 10 1 0 11 3 4 1 0 19 12 1 7517:15 0 0 1 0 7 26 1 0 17 1 3 4 0 27 22 0 10917:30 3 3 0 0 7 14 1 0 15 1 7 0 1 33 16 1 10217:45 0 1 2 1 5 10 0 2 20 0 3 3 3 34 8 0 92Total 4 8 3 1 27 60 3 2 63 5 17 8 4 113 58 2 378

Grand Total 12 25 6 7 61 159 8 13 203 21 62 20 7 300 223 15 1142Apprch % 24 50 12 14 25.3 66 3.3 5.4 66.3 6.9 20.3 6.5 1.3 55 40.9 2.8

Total % 1.1 2.2 0.5 0.6 5.3 13.9 0.7 1.1 17.8 1.8 5.4 1.8 0.6 26.3 19.5 1.3


San Diego, CA 92103


CENTER STSouthbound

BEYER BLVDWestbound

CENTER STNorthbound

BEYER BLVDEastbound

Start Time Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Left Thru Right Peds App. Total Int. Total

Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 to 11:45 - Peak 1 of 1

Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:4507:45 0 1 0 1 2 4 10 1 2 17 15 0 1 2 18 0 10 19 1 30 6708:00 0 1 0 0 1 2 4 1 0 7 8 1 2 1 12 0 11 16 1 28 4808:15 1 1 1 0 3 0 2 0 0 2 13 2 7 0 22 0 6 9 0 15 4208:30 0 0 1 0 1 1 6 0 2 9 12 1 2 2 17 0 9 10 2 21 48

Total Volume 1 3 2 1 7 7 22 2 4 35 48 4 12 5 69 0 36 54 4 94 205% App. Total 14.3 42.9 28.6 14.3 20 62.9 5.7 11.4 69.6 5.8 17.4 7.2 0 38.3 57.4 4.3

PHF .250 .750 .500 .250 .583 .438 .550 .500 .500 .515 .800 .500 .429 .625 .784 .000 .818 .711 .500 .783 .765

CENTER ST

BE

YE

R B

LV

D B

EY

ER

BL

VD

CENTER ST

Right2

Thru3

Left1

Peds1

InOut Total6 7 13

Rig

ht2

Th

ru22

L

eft7

P

ed

s4

Ou

tT

ota

lIn

49

3

5

84

Left48

Thru4

Right12

Peds5

Out TotalIn64 69 133

Le

ft0

T

hru3

6

Rig

ht

54

P

ed

s4

To

tal

Ou

tIn

72

9

4

16

6

Peak Hour Begins at 07:45 Vehicles

Peak Hour Data

North


San Diego, CA 92103


CENTER STSouthbound

BEYER BLVDWestbound

CENTER STNorthbound

BEYER BLVDEastbound




Total Volume 4 8 3 1 16 27 60 3 2 92 63 5 17 8 93 4 113 58 2 177 378% App. Total 25 50 18.8 6.2 29.3 65.2 3.3 2.2 67.7 5.4 18.3 8.6 2.3 63.8 32.8 1.1

PHF .333 .500 .375 .250 .667 .844 .577 .750 .250 .676 .788 .417 .607 .500 .894 .333 .831 .659 .500 .868 .867

CENTER ST

BE

YE

R B

LV

D B

EY

ER

BL

VD

CENTER ST

Right3

Thru8

Left4

Peds1

InOut Total12 16 28

Rig

ht3

Th

ru60

L

eft27

P

ed

s2

Ou

tT

ota

lIn

13

4

92

2

26

Left63

Thru5

Right17

Peds8


Le

ft4

T

hru11

3

Rig

ht

58

P

ed

s2

To

tal

Ou

tIn

12

6

17

7

30

3


Peak Hour Data

North


San Diego, CA 92103

File Name : 9071.04.BEYER BLVD.BOLTON HALL RDSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 7/21/2009Page No : 1

Groups Printed- VehiclesBEYER BLVDSouthbound

BOLTON HALL RDWestbound

BEYER BLVDNorthbound

BOLTON HALL RDEastbound


07:00 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 1307:15 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 1 0 0 3 2007:30 0 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 2 0 0 1 2207:45 0 8 7 0 0 0 0 1 1 7 0 0 1 0 1 1 27Total 0 30 11 0 0 0 0 1 2 26 0 0 4 0 1 7 82

08:00 0 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 2208:15 0 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 3 2208:30 0 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 2008:45 0 18 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 35Total 0 43 20 0 0 0 0 0 1 28 0 0 1 0 1 5 99

*** BREAK ***

16:00 0 11 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 16 0 0 4 0 2 0 4416:15 0 34 10 0 0 0 0 0 2 18 0 0 6 0 2 1 7316:30 0 14 10 0 0 0 0 0 4 15 0 0 5 0 2 1 5116:45 0 30 15 0 0 0 0 0 1 16 0 0 5 0 1 0 68Total 0 89 45 0 0 0 0 0 8 65 0 0 20 0 7 2 236

17:00 0 24 13 0 0 0 0 0 1 18 0 0 6 0 1 2 6517:15 0 22 11 0 0 0 0 0 3 24 0 0 6 0 0 3 6917:30 0 33 12 1 0 0 0 0 1 15 0 0 5 0 1 2 7017:45 0 23 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 13 0 0 2 0 2 0 46Total 0 102 40 1 0 0 0 1 6 70 0 0 19 0 4 7 250

Grand Total 0 264 116 1 0 0 0 2 17 189 0 0 44 0 13 21 667Apprch % 0 69.3 30.4 0.3 0 0 0 100 8.3 91.7 0 0 56.4 0 16.7 26.9

Total % 0 39.6 17.4 0.1 0 0 0 0.3 2.5 28.3 0 0 6.6 0 1.9 3.1


San Diego, CA 92103


BEYER BLVDSouthbound







Total Volume 0 43 20 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 1 28 0 0 29 1 0 1 5 7 99% App. Total 0 68.3 31.7 0 0 0 0 0 3.4 96.6 0 0 14.3 0 14.3 71.4

PHF .000 .597 .625 .000 .606 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .778 .000 .000 .806 .250 .000 .250 .417 .438 .707

BEYER BLVD

BO

LT

ON

HA

LL

RD

BO

LT

ON

HA

LL

RD

BEYER BLVD

Right20

Thru43

Left0

Peds0

InOut Total29 63 92

Rig

ht0

Th

ru0

Le

ft0

Pe

ds0

Ou

tT

ota

lIn

0

0

0

Left1

Thru28

Right0

Peds0

Out TotalIn44 29 73

Le

ft1

T

hru

0

Rig

ht1

Pe

ds5

To

tal

Ou

tIn

21

7

2

8


Peak Hour Data

North


San Diego, CA 92103


BEYER BLVDSouthbound







Total Volume 0 109 51 1 161 0 0 0 0 0 6 73 0 0 79 22 0 3 7 32 272% App. Total 0 67.7 31.7 0.6 0 0 0 0 7.6 92.4 0 0 68.8 0 9.4 21.9

PHF .000 .826 .850 .250 .875 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .760 .000 .000 .731 .917 .000 .750 .583 .889 .971

BEYER BLVD

BO

LT

ON

HA

LL

RD

BO

LT

ON

HA

LL

RD

BEYER BLVD

Right51

Thru109

Left0

Peds1

InOut Total95 161 256

Rig

ht0

Th

ru0

Le

ft0

Pe

ds0

Ou

tT

ota

lIn

0

0

0

Left6

Thru73

Right0

Peds0


Le

ft22

T

hru

0

Rig

ht3

Pe

ds7

To

tal

Ou

tIn

57

3

2

89


Peak Hour Data

North


San Diego, CA 92103

File Name : 9071.01.CENTER ST.SAN YSIDRO BLVDSite Code : 00000000Start Date : 7/22/2009Page No : 1

Groups Printed- VehiclesCENTER STSouthbound

SAN YSIDRO BLVDWestbound

CENTER STNorthbound

SAN YSIDRO BLVDEastbound


07:00 0 0 13 6 0 60 3 0 0 0 0 3 10 79 0 0 17407:15 1 0 21 12 0 58 3 0 0 0 0 1 8 90 0 0 19407:30 0 0 20 12 0 72 6 0 0 0 0 4 8 98 0 0 22007:45 1 0 21 12 0 69 0 0 0 0 0 4 17 113 0 0 237Total 2 0 75 42 0 259 12 0 0 0 0 12 43 380 0 0 825

08:00 0 0 23 14 0 69 2 3 0 0 0 7 11 130 0 0 25908:15 0 0 13 3 0 112 3 0 0 0 0 10 12 146 0 0 29908:30 0 0 12 4 0 96 4 0 0 0 0 6 13 140 0 0 27508:45 0 0 28 12 0 113 2 0 0 0 0 2 10 194 0 0 361Total 0 0 76 33 0 390 11 3 0 0 0 25 46 610 0 0 1194

*** BREAK ***

16:00 1 0 20 6 0 205 6 10 0 0 0 5 17 228 0 0 49816:15 2 0 20 13 0 235 8 8 0 0 0 8 19 243 0 2 55816:30 2 0 23 9 0 265 4 0 0 0 0 5 13 229 0 0 55016:45 0 0 15 2 0 222 5 0 0 0 0 7 21 226 0 0 498Total 5 0 78 30 0 927 23 18 0 0 0 25 70 926 0 2 2104

17:00 1 0 22 10 0 227 4 1 0 0 0 4 10 215 0 0 49417:15 0 0 26 9 0 194 7 2 0 0 0 7 16 211 0 1 47317:30 0 0 30 4 0 193 2 6 0 0 0 10 17 180 0 0 44217:45 1 0 14 6 0 189 7 3 0 0 0 15 19 207 0 0 461Total 2 0 92 29 0 803 20 12 0 0 0 36 62 813 0 1 1870

Grand Total 9 0 321 134 0 2379 66 33 0 0 0 98 221 2729 0 3 5993Apprch % 1.9 0 69.2 28.9 0 96 2.7 1.3 0 0 0 100 7.5 92.4 0 0.1

Total % 0.2 0 5.4 2.2 0 39.7 1.1 0.6 0 0 0 1.6 3.7 45.5 0 0.1


San Diego, CA 92103


CENTER STSouthbound


CENTER STNorthbound





Total Volume 0 0 76 33 109 0 390 11 3 404 0 0 0 25 25 46 610 0 0 656 1194% App. Total 0 0 69.7 30.3 0 96.5 2.7 0.7 0 0 0 100 7 93 0 0

PHF .000 .000 .679 .589 .681 .000 .863 .688 .250 .878 .000 .000 .000 .625 .625 .885 .786 .000 .000 .804 .827

CENTER ST

SA

N Y

SID

RO

BL

VD

SA

N Y

SID

RO

BL

VD

CENTER ST

Right76

Thru0

Left0

Peds33


Rig

ht

11

T

hru

39

0

Le

ft0

Pe

ds3

Ou

tT

ota

lIn

61

0

40

4

10

14

Left0

Thru0

Right0

Peds25

Out TotalIn0 25 25

Le

ft46

T

hru61

0

Rig

ht0

Pe

ds0

To

tal

Ou

tIn

46

6

65

6

11

22


Peak Hour Data

North


San Diego, CA 92103


CENTER STSouthbound


CENTER STNorthbound





Total Volume 5 0 78 30 113 0 927 23 18 968 0 0 0 25 25 70 926 0 2 998 2104% App. Total 4.4 0 69 26.5 0 95.8 2.4 1.9 0 0 0 100 7 92.8 0 0.2

PHF .625 .000 .848 .577 .807 .000 .875 .719 .450 .900 .000 .000 .000 .781 .781 .833 .953 .000 .250 .945 .943

CENTER ST

SA

N Y

SID

RO

BL

VD

SA

N Y

SID

RO

BL

VD

CENTER ST

Right78

Thru0

Left5

Peds30


Rig

ht

23

T

hru

92

7

Le

ft0

Pe

ds18

Ou

tT

ota

lIn

93

1

96

8

18

99

Left0

Thru0

Right0

Peds25

Out TotalIn0 25 25

Le

ft70

T

hru92

6

Rig

ht0

Pe

ds2

To

tal

Ou

tIn

10

05

9

98

2

00

3


Peak Hour Data

North

Intersection Turning MovementPrepared by:

National Data & Surveying Services

N-S STREET: DATE: 06/05/2007 LOCATION:

E-W STREET: DAY: TUESDAY PROJECT#

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 0.5 0.5 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1.5 0.5

6:00 AM6:15 AM6:30 AM6:45 AM7:00 AM 10 15 39 58 34 24 1807:15 AM 12 17 47 60 37 25 1987:30 AM 14 25 57 65 41 28 2307:45 AM 18 20 71 120 54 46 3298:00 AM 16 20 37 78 50 46 2478:15 AM 16 35 52 84 77 56 3208:30 AM 24 35 66 83 56 39 3038:45 AM 14 45 42 93 66 52 3129:00 AM9:15 AM9:30 AM9:45 AM

10:00 AM10:15 AM10:30 AM10:45 AM11:00 AM11:15 AM11:30 AM11:45 AM

TOTAL NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTALVOLUMES = 124 0 212 0 0 0 411 641 0 0 415 316 2119

nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d336 727 0 0 1052 853 731 539

745 AM

PEAKVOLUMES = 74 0 110 0 0 0 226 365 0 0 237 187 1199

PEAK HR.FACTOR: 0.911

CONTROL: Signalized

NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND

0.780 0.000 0.774

07-4107-009

AM Peak Hr Begins at:

City of San Diego

0.797

WESTBOUND

I-805 NB ramps

E San Ysidro Blvd




E-W STREET: DAY: TUESDAY PROJECT#

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 0.5 0.5 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1.5 0.5

1:00 PM1:15 PM1:30 PM1:45 PM2:00 PM2:15 PM2:30 PM2:45 PM3:00 PM3:15 PM3:30 PM3:45 PM4:00 PM 40 1 57 77 170 106 98 5494:15 PM 23 2 79 61 145 110 102 5224:30 PM 38 1 70 58 169 111 115 5624:45 PM 26 0 59 58 153 117 103 5165:00 PM 27 1 80 50 181 99 96 5345:15 PM 28 1 81 69 158 110 121 5685:30 PM 38 0 78 81 158 128 133 6165:45 PM 43 1 72 62 159 115 107 5596:00 PM6:15 PM6:30 PM6:45 PM



500 PM

PEAKVOLUMES = 136 3 311 0 0 0 262 656 0 0 452 457 2277


CONTROL: Signalized


0.970 0.000 0.960

07-4107-009

PM Peak Hr Begins at:

City of San Diego

0.871

WESTBOUND

I-805 NB ramps

E San Ysidro Blvd




E-W STREET: DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT#

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 0 0 0 1.3 0.3 1.3 0 2 0 1 2 0

6:00 AM6:15 AM6:30 AM6:45 AM7:00 AM 19 0 25 54 14 7 38 1577:15 AM 15 0 43 87 25 7 49 2267:30 AM 36 0 48 105 20 5 48 2627:45 AM 54 1 62 121 33 6 48 3258:00 AM 53 1 37 112 29 12 63 3078:15 AM 41 0 47 102 31 8 75 3048:30 AM 52 1 56 83 26 14 82 3148:45 AM 65 0 63 114 32 11 67 3529:00 AM9:15 AM9:30 AM9:45 AM

10:00 AM10:15 AM10:30 AM10:45 AM11:00 AM11:15 AM11:30 AM11:45 AM



800 AM

PEAKVOLUMES = 0 0 0 211 2 203 0 411 118 45 287 0 1277


CONTROL: Signalized

07-4107-008

AM Peak Hr Begins at:

City of San Diego

0.865

WESTBOUND

I-805 SB ramps

E San Ysidro Blvd


0.000 0.813 0.906




E-W STREET: DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT#

NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL LANES: 0 0 0 1.3 0.3 1.3 0 2 0 1 2 0

1:00 PM1:15 PM1:30 PM1:45 PM2:00 PM2:15 PM2:30 PM2:45 PM3:00 PM3:15 PM3:30 PM3:45 PM4:00 PM 83 2 48 137 74 53 112 5094:15 PM 97 1 50 144 70 47 112 5214:30 PM 88 1 56 145 89 48 119 5464:45 PM 105 0 46 149 85 43 91 5195:00 PM 85 1 50 133 77 55 93 4945:15 PM 98 3 58 140 84 41 88 5125:30 PM 98 0 58 131 88 35 110 5205:45 PM 98 0 50 123 98 31 89 4896:00 PM6:15 PM6:30 PM6:45 PM



400 PM

PEAKVOLUMES = 0 0 0 373 4 200 0 575 318 191 434 0 2095


CONTROL: Signalized

07-4107-008

PM Peak Hr Begins at:

City of San Diego

0.936

WESTBOUND

I-805 SB ramps

E San Ysidro Blvd


0.000 0.955 0.954

MetroCount Traffic Executive Vehicle Counts

VehicleCount-1617 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [9056.02] BEYER BLVD (HILL ST-FILOI AVE) NORTHBOUND Direction: 7 - North bound A>B, South bound B>A., Lane: 0 Survey Duration: 11:03 Monday, July 13, 2009 => 11:40 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 File: C:\Users\Gus\True Count\Projects\9056 SAN YSIDRO\9056.0221Jul2009.EC0 (Regular) Identifier: S1339PHE MC56-L5 [MC55] (c)Microcom 19Oct04 Algorithm: Factory default Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Filter time: 0:00 Tuesday, July 14, 2009 => 0:00 Wednesday, July 15, 2009 Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 5 - 100 mph. Direction: North (bound) Separation: All - (Headway) Name: TC Default Profile Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F2) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, lb, ton) In profile: Vehicles = 1911 / 10933 (17.48%) * Tuesday, July 14, 2009 - Total=1911, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300

17 13 11 10 22 31 40 103 174 115 73 100 94 101 111 126 140 160 123 112 89 62 54 30

2 7 3 2 7 4 12 11 53 51 16 31 30 25 23 30 34 37 32 20 27 14 10 8 -

5 2 1 4 4 6 9 20 44 29 17 21 15 23 25 22 36 46 32 32 28 21 12 9 -

7 0 2 1 6 7 9 25 40 14 19 26 20 27 29 38 36 46 33 30 21 12 13 7 -

3 4 5 3 5 14 10 47 37 21 21 22 29 26 34 36 34 31 26 30 13 15 19 6 -

AM Peak 0745 - 0845 (184), AM PHF=0.87


VehicleCount-1618 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [9056.02] BEYER BLVD (HILL ST-FILOI AVE) SOUTHBOUND Direction: 7 - North bound A>B, South bound B>A., Lane: 0 Survey Duration: 11:03 Monday, July 13, 2009 => 11:40 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 File: C:\Users\Gus\True Count\Projects\9056 SAN YSIDRO\9056.0221Jul2009.EC0 (Regular) Identifier: S1339PHE MC56-L5 [MC55] (c)Microcom 19Oct04 Algorithm: Factory default Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Filter time: 0:00 Tuesday, July 14, 2009 => 0:00 Wednesday, July 15, 2009 Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 5 - 100 mph. Direction: South (bound) Separation: All - (Headway) Name: TC Default Profile Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F2) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, lb, ton) In profile: Vehicles = 2255 / 10933 (20.63%) * Tuesday, July 14, 2009 - Total=2255, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300

9 8 8 9 30 44 60 125 149 136 124 143 149 137 136 154 167 165 196 105 96 52 33 20

0 3 4 2 7 10 11 20 23 38 22 42 34 41 37 41 52 45 49 21 27 13 5 8 -

2 1 1 3 3 6 13 30 39 30 29 24 40 34 28 38 38 41 55 31 28 16 12 8 -

1 3 2 1 11 10 19 37 35 30 31 42 41 33 31 40 37 40 55 36 19 16 12 2 -

6 1 1 3 9 18 17 38 52 38 42 35 34 29 40 35 40 39 37 17 22 7 4 2 -

AM Peak 0815 - 0915 (164), AM PHF=0.79

Average Daily Traffic VolumesPrepared by: Southland Car Counters

Volumes for: Thursday, May 31, 2007 City: San Diego Project #:

Location: E San Ysidro Blvd fr Border Village Rd to Bolton Hall RdAM Period NB SB EB WB PM Period NB SB EB WB

00:00 6 11 12:00 112 12300:15 6 8 12:15 106 11200:30 8 16 12:30 142 12400:45 12 32 13 48 80 12:45 125 485 130 489 974

01:00 9 16 13:00 106 12801:15 2 11 13:15 107 11101:30 8 8 13:30 131 13401:45 3 22 12 47 69 13:45 114 458 128 501 959

02:00 8 10 14:00 116 14502:15 6 10 14:15 112 11902:30 4 7 14:30 105 13402:45 9 27 20 47 74 14:45 124 457 141 539 996

03:00 11 18 15:00 144 13603:15 5 19 15:15 120 16303:30 5 16 15:30 129 11903:45 7 28 12 65 93 15:45 134 527 147 565 1092

04:00 8 9 16:00 120 12304:15 19 20 16:15 128 12504:30 19 24 16:30 127 13204:45 24 70 27 80 150 16:45 137 512 137 517 1029

05:00 32 23 17:00 126 15005:15 27 41 17:15 138 13305:30 26 33 17:30 127 13005:45 30 115 35 132 247 17:45 117 508 133 546 1054

06:00 32 33 18:00 135 12106:15 37 30 18:15 125 13006:30 22 30 18:30 114 11406:45 28 119 34 127 246 18:45 108 482 105 470 952

07:00 33 27 19:00 110 10707:15 37 33 19:15 142 11307:30 41 44 19:30 96 9307:45 43 154 38 142 296 19:45 100 448 111 424 872

08:00 57 33 20:00 93 8608:15 65 49 20:15 59 7308:30 63 65 20:30 73 7708:45 89 274 55 202 476 20:45 56 281 71 307 588

09:00 81 71 21:00 46 6309:15 82 71 21:15 36 6309:30 101 80 21:30 35 5309:45 90 354 92 314 668 21:45 33 150 47 226 376

10:00 85 82 22:00 36 3810:15 94 90 22:15 26 3610:30 99 89 22:30 30 4110:45 104 382 88 349 731 22:45 22 114 21 136 250

11:00 99 125 23:00 21 1511:15 115 93 23:15 16 1711:30 127 131 23:30 15 1911:45 121 462 124 473 935 23:45 15 67 23 74 141

Total Vol. 2039 2026 4065 4489 4794 9283

NB SB EB WB Combined

6528 6820 13348

Split % 50.2% 49.8% 30.5% 48.4% 51.6% 69.5%

Peak Hour 11:45 11:30 11:45 16:30 14:30 15:00

Volume 481 490 964 528 574 1092P.H.F. 0.85 0.94 0.91 0.96 0.88 0.96

PMAM

Daily Totals

07-4108-013

APPENDIX B

Peak-Hour Intersection Level of Service Worksheets

San Ysidro Facility Existing1: Proposed New Dwy & E. Beyer Blvd Timing Plan: AM

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.

Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBTLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Free FreeGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 0 0 72 0 0 90Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.25 0.25 0.78Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 0 92 0 0 115PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 208 92 92vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 208 92 92tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2p0 queue free % 100 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 781 965 1502

Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 0 92 115Volume Left 0 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0cSH 1700 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.05 0.07Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0Lane LOS AApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0Approach LOS A

Intersection SummaryAverage Delay 0.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 8.1% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

San Ysidro Facility Existing2: E. Beyer Blvd & Hill St Timing Plan: AM


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Stop Stop Stop StopVolume (vph) 0 36 54 7 22 2 48 4 12 1 3 2Peak Hour Factor 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.58 0.58 0.58Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 46 69 13 42 4 62 5 15 2 5 3

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 115 60 82 10Volume Left (vph) 0 13 62 2Volume Right (vph) 69 4 15 3Hadj (s) -0.33 0.04 0.07 -0.13Departure Headway (s) 3.8 4.3 4.3 4.2Degree Utilization, x 0.12 0.07 0.10 0.01Capacity (veh/h) 908 820 791 809Control Delay (s) 7.4 7.6 7.8 7.3Approach Delay (s) 7.4 7.6 7.8 7.3Approach LOS A A A A

Intersection SummaryDelay 7.6HCM Level of Service AIntersection Capacity Utilization 24.4% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

San Ysidro Facility Existing3: E. Beyer Blvd & Bolton Hall Rd Timing Plan: AM


Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 43 20 1 28 1 1Peak Hour Factor 0.61 0.61 0.81 0.81 0.44 0.44Hourly flow rate (vph) 70 33 1 35 2 2PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft)pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 103 124 87vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 103 124 87tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 100 100 100cM capacity (veh/h) 1489 870 972

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1Volume Total 103 36 5Volume Left 0 1 2Volume Right 33 0 2cSH 1700 1489 918Volume to Capacity 0.06 0.00 0.00Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 8.9Lane LOS A AApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.3 8.9Approach LOS A


San Ysidro Facility Existing4: E. Beyer Blvd & Existing Dwy Timing Plan: AM


Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 3 41 26 0 0 3Peak Hour Factor 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58Hourly flow rate (vph) 5 71 45 0 0 5PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 690pX, platoon unblockedvC, conflicting volume 45 126 45vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 45 126 45tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 100 100 99cM capacity (veh/h) 1563 866 1025

Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 SB 1Volume Total 76 45 5Volume Left 5 0 0Volume Right 0 0 5cSH 1563 1700 1025Volume to Capacity 0.00 0.03 0.01Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0Control Delay (s) 0.5 0.0 8.5Lane LOS A AApproach Delay (s) 0.5 0.0 8.5Approach LOS A


San Ysidro Facility Existing5: E. San Ysidro Blvd & Center St Timing Plan: AM


Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBRLane ConfigurationsSign Control Free Free StopGrade 0% 0% 0%Volume (veh/h) 46 610 390 11 0 76Peak Hour Factor 0.80 0.80 0.88 0.88 0.25 0.68Hourly flow rate (vph) 58 762 443 12 0 112PedestriansLane Width (ft)Walking Speed (ft/s)Percent BlockageRight turn flare (veh)Median type NoneMedian storage veh)Upstream signal (ft) 170pX, platoon unblocked 0.92vC, conflicting volume 456 946 228vC1, stage 1 conf volvC2, stage 2 conf volvCu, unblocked vol 456 855 228tC, single (s) 4.1 6.8 6.9tC, 2 stage (s)tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3p0 queue free % 95 100 86cM capacity (veh/h) 1101 259 775

Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1Volume Total 58 381 381 295 160 112Volume Left 58 0 0 0 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0 0 12 112cSH 1101 1700 1700 1700 1700 775Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.22 0.22 0.17 0.09 0.14Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 0 0 0 0 13Control Delay (s) 8.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.4Lane LOS A BApproach Delay (s) 0.6 0.0 10.4Approach LOS B


San Ysidro Facility Existing6: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 NB Ramp Timing Plan: AM


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 3305 1770 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 3305 1770 1583Volume (vph) 226 365 0 0 237 187 74 0 110 0 0 0Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.25 0.25 0.25Adj. Flow (vph) 294 474 0 0 296 234 95 0 141 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 190 0 0 0 79 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 294 474 0 0 340 0 0 95 62 0 0 0Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 8 2Permitted Phases 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 10.3 25.5 11.2 26.3 26.3Effective Green, g (s) 10.3 25.5 11.2 26.3 26.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.43 0.19 0.44 0.44Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 591 1509 619 778 696v/s Ratio Prot c0.09 0.13 c0.10v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.04v/c Ratio 0.50 0.31 0.55 0.12 0.09Uniform Delay, d1 22.4 11.4 22.0 9.9 9.8Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.1 1.0 0.3 0.3Delay (s) 23.1 11.5 23.0 10.2 10.0Level of Service C B C B BApproach Delay (s) 15.9 23.0 10.1 0.0Approach LOS B C B A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 17.5 HCM Level of Service BHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.30Actuated Cycle Length (s) 59.8 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 33.1% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

San Ysidro Facility Existing7: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 SB Ramp Timing Plan: AM


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.95Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1550 1504Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1550 1504Volume (vph) 0 411 118 45 287 0 0 0 0 211 2 203Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.81 0.81 0.81Adj. Flow (vph) 0 452 130 52 334 0 0 0 0 260 2 251RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 91Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 452 28 52 334 0 0 0 0 159 150 95Turn Type Perm Prot Prot PermProtected Phases 4 3 8 1 6Permitted Phases 4 6Actuated Green, G (s) 12.7 12.7 3.7 20.4 29.8 29.8 29.8Effective Green, g (s) 12.7 12.7 3.7 20.4 29.8 29.8 29.8Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.06 0.35 0.51 0.51 0.51Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 772 345 218 1240 861 794 770v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.02 c0.09 0.09 c0.10v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 0.06v/c Ratio 0.59 0.08 0.24 0.27 0.18 0.19 0.12Uniform Delay, d1 20.4 18.1 25.9 13.6 7.7 7.7 7.4Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3Delay (s) 21.5 18.2 26.5 13.7 7.8 7.8 7.7Level of Service C B C B A A AApproach Delay (s) 20.8 15.4 0.0 7.8Approach LOS C B A A


San Ysidro Facility Existing1: Proposed New Dwy & E. Beyer Blvd Timing Plan: PM

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\Ex PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.




San Ysidro Facility Existing2: E. Beyer Blvd & Hill St Timing Plan: PM





San Ysidro Facility Existing3: E. Beyer Blvd & Bolton Hall Rd Timing Plan: PM



Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1Volume Total 182 108 28Volume Left 0 8 25Volume Right 58 0 3cSH 1700 1393 733Volume to Capacity 0.11 0.01 0.04Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 3Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.6 10.1Lane LOS A BApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.6 10.1Approach LOS B


San Ysidro Facility Existing4: E. Beyer Blvd & Existing Dwy Timing Plan: PM





San Ysidro Facility Existing5: E. San Ysidro Blvd & Center St Timing Plan: PM



Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1Volume Total 74 487 487 687 369 98Volume Left 74 0 0 0 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0 0 26 98cSH 655 1700 1700 1700 1700 495Volume to Capacity 0.11 0.29 0.29 0.40 0.22 0.20Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 0 0 0 0 18Control Delay (s) 11.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.0Lane LOS B BApproach Delay (s) 0.8 0.0 14.0Approach LOS B


San Ysidro Facility Existing6: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 NB Ramp Timing Plan: PM


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 3273 1776 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 3273 1776 1583Volume (vph) 262 656 0 0 452 457 136 3 311 0 0 0Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.25 0.25 0.25Adj. Flow (vph) 273 683 0 0 520 525 140 3 321 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 201 0 0 0 167 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 273 683 0 0 844 0 0 143 154 0 0 0Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 8 2Permitted Phases 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 11.0 38.7 23.7 26.3 26.3Effective Green, g (s) 11.0 38.7 23.7 26.3 26.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.53 0.32 0.36 0.36Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 517 1876 1063 640 570v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.19 c0.26v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 c0.10v/c Ratio 0.53 0.36 0.79 0.22 0.27Uniform Delay, d1 28.6 10.0 22.4 16.2 16.5Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 0.1 4.2 0.8 1.2Delay (s) 29.6 10.1 26.6 17.1 17.7Level of Service C B C B BApproach Delay (s) 15.7 26.6 17.5 0.0Approach LOS B C B A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 20.6 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52Actuated Cycle Length (s) 73.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

San Ysidro Facility Existing7: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 SB Ramp Timing Plan: PM


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.91 0.95Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1616 1504Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1616 1504Volume (vph) 0 575 318 191 434 0 0 0 0 373 4 200Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.95 0.95 0.95Adj. Flow (vph) 0 605 335 203 462 0 0 0 0 393 4 211RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 246 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 121Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 605 89 203 462 0 0 0 0 198 199 90Turn Type Perm Prot Prot PermProtected Phases 4 3 8 1 6Permitted Phases 4 6Actuated Green, G (s) 18.2 18.2 9.3 31.5 29.3 29.3 29.3Effective Green, g (s) 18.2 18.2 9.3 31.5 29.3 29.3 29.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.14 0.46 0.43 0.43 0.43Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 936 419 464 1620 716 688 641v/s Ratio Prot c0.17 c0.06 0.13 0.12 c0.12v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.06v/c Ratio 0.65 0.21 0.44 0.29 0.28 0.29 0.14Uniform Delay, d1 22.4 19.7 27.3 11.6 12.9 12.9 12.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 0.3 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.5Delay (s) 24.0 20.0 28.0 11.7 13.1 13.2 12.5Level of Service C B C B B B BApproach Delay (s) 22.6 16.7 0.0 12.9Approach LOS C B A B


San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project1: Proposed New Dwy & E. Beyer Blvd Timing Plan: AM

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.




San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project2: E. Beyer Blvd & Hill St Timing Plan: AM





San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project3: E. Beyer Blvd & Bolton Hall Rd Timing Plan: AM





San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project4: E. Beyer Blvd & Existing Dwy Timing Plan: AM





San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project5: E. San Ysidro Blvd & Center St Timing Plan: AM





San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project6: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 NB Ramp Timing Plan: AM




San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project7: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 SB Ramp Timing Plan: AM




San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project1: Proposed New Dwy & E. Beyer Blvd Timing Plan: PM

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\NTWP PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.


Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 15 185 257Volume Left 15 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0cSH 572 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.11 0.15Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0Control Delay (s) 11.5 0.0 0.0Lane LOS BApproach Delay (s) 11.5 0.0 0.0Approach LOS B


San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project2: E. Beyer Blvd & Hill St Timing Plan: PM





San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project3: E. Beyer Blvd & Bolton Hall Rd Timing Plan: PM



Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1Volume Total 188 101 28Volume Left 0 8 25Volume Right 58 0 3cSH 1700 1387 734Volume to Capacity 0.11 0.01 0.04Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 3Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.7 10.1Lane LOS A BApproach Delay (s) 0.0 0.7 10.1Approach LOS B


San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project4: E. Beyer Blvd & Existing Dwy Timing Plan: PM





San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project5: E. San Ysidro Blvd & Center St Timing Plan: PM



Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1Volume Total 79 487 487 687 369 104Volume Left 79 0 0 0 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0 0 26 104cSH 655 1700 1700 1700 1700 495Volume to Capacity 0.12 0.29 0.29 0.40 0.22 0.21Queue Length 95th (ft) 10 0 0 0 0 20Control Delay (s) 11.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.2Lane LOS B BApproach Delay (s) 0.8 0.0 14.2Approach LOS B


San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project6: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 NB Ramp Timing Plan: PM


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 3271 1776 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 3271 1776 1583Volume (vph) 262 661 0 0 452 462 136 3 311 0 0 0Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.25 0.25 0.25Adj. Flow (vph) 273 689 0 0 520 531 140 3 321 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 202 0 0 0 165 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 273 689 0 0 849 0 0 143 156 0 0 0Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 8 2Permitted Phases 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 11.0 39.0 24.0 26.3 26.3Effective Green, g (s) 11.0 39.0 24.0 26.3 26.3Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.53 0.33 0.36 0.36Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 515 1883 1071 637 568v/s Ratio Prot c0.08 0.19 c0.26v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 c0.10v/c Ratio 0.53 0.37 0.79 0.22 0.27Uniform Delay, d1 28.8 10.0 22.4 16.4 16.7Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 1.1 0.1 4.1 0.8 1.2Delay (s) 29.8 10.1 26.5 17.2 17.9Level of Service C B C B BApproach Delay (s) 15.7 26.5 17.7 0.0Approach LOS B C B A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 20.6 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.52Actuated Cycle Length (s) 73.3 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.5% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

San Ysidro Facility Near Term Plus Project7: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 SB Ramp Timing Plan: PM




San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Baseline1: Proposed New Dwy & E. Beyer Blvd Timing Plan: PM

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BO PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BO PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.




San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Baseline2: E. Beyer Blvd & Hill St Timing Plan: PM



Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 594 400 187 39Volume Left (vph) 11 51 156 9Volume Right (vph) 155 7 25 16Hadj (s) -0.12 0.05 0.12 -0.17Departure Headway (s) 5.2 5.6 6.7 6.9Degree Utilization, x 0.86 0.63 0.35 0.07Capacity (veh/h) 675 608 496 452Control Delay (s) 31.9 17.6 13.2 10.5Approach Delay (s) 31.9 17.6 13.2 10.5Approach LOS D C B B

Intersection SummaryDelay 23.7HCM Level of Service CIntersection Capacity Utilization 54.7% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Baseline3: E. Beyer Blvd & Bolton Hall Rd Timing Plan: PM



Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1Volume Total 436 242 128Volume Left 0 68 91Volume Right 212 0 37cSH 1700 1123 469Volume to Capacity 0.26 0.06 0.27Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 5 27Control Delay (s) 0.0 2.8 15.5Lane LOS A CApproach Delay (s) 0.0 2.8 15.5Approach LOS C


San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Baseline4: E. Beyer Blvd & Existing Dwy Timing Plan: PM





San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Baseline5: E. San Ysidro Blvd & Center St Timing Plan: PM



Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1Volume Total 132 668 668 833 549 185Volume Left 132 0 0 0 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0 0 132 185cSH 492 1700 1700 1700 1700 387Volume to Capacity 0.27 0.39 0.39 0.49 0.32 0.48Queue Length 95th (ft) 27 0 0 0 0 63Control Delay (s) 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.5Lane LOS B CApproach Delay (s) 1.3 0.0 22.5Approach LOS C


San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Baseline6: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 NB Ramp Timing Plan: PM


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 3299 1776 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 3299 1776 1583Volume (vph) 202 1016 0 0 698 575 102 2 379 0 0 0Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.25 0.25 0.25Adj. Flow (vph) 210 1058 0 0 802 661 105 2 391 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 152 0 0 0 76 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 210 1058 0 0 1311 0 0 107 315 0 0 0Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 8 2Permitted Phases 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 10.0 43.0 29.0 26.0 26.0Effective Green, g (s) 10.0 43.0 29.0 26.0 26.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.56 0.38 0.34 0.34Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 446 1976 1242 600 535v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.30 c0.40v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.20v/c Ratio 0.47 0.54 1.06 0.18 0.59Uniform Delay, d1 31.0 10.7 24.0 18.0 21.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.3 41.5 0.6 4.7Delay (s) 31.8 11.0 65.5 18.6 25.8Level of Service C B E B CApproach Delay (s) 14.4 65.5 24.2 0.0Approach LOS B E C A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 39.1 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80Actuated Cycle Length (s) 77.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.3% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Baseline7: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 SB Ramp Timing Plan: PM



Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 20.0 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.54Actuated Cycle Length (s) 77.5 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.3% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project1: Proposed New Dwy & E. Beyer Blvd Timing Plan: AM

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP AM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP AM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.


Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 13 277 324Volume Left 13 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0cSH 463 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.03 0.16 0.19Queue Length 95th (ft) 2 0 0Control Delay (s) 13.0 0.0 0.0Lane LOS BApproach Delay (s) 13.0 0.0 0.0Approach LOS B


San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project2: E. Beyer Blvd & Hill St Timing Plan: AM



Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 337 185 177 19Volume Left (vph) 0 2 154 5Volume Right (vph) 160 8 15 9Hadj (s) -0.25 0.01 0.16 -0.18Departure Headway (s) 4.4 4.9 5.3 5.2Degree Utilization, x 0.41 0.25 0.26 0.03Capacity (veh/h) 772 699 626 593Control Delay (s) 10.5 9.4 10.1 8.4Approach Delay (s) 10.5 9.4 10.1 8.4Approach LOS B A B A

Intersection SummaryDelay 10.1HCM Level of Service BIntersection Capacity Utilization 35.9% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project3: E. Beyer Blvd & Bolton Hall Rd Timing Plan: AM





San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project4: E. Beyer Blvd & Existing Dwy Timing Plan: AM





San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project5: E. San Ysidro Blvd & Center St Timing Plan: AM





San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project6: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 NB Ramp Timing Plan: AM




San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project7: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 SB Ramp Timing Plan: AM




San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project1: Proposed New Dwy & E. Beyer Blvd Timing Plan: PM

K:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP PM.sy7 Synchro 6 ReportK:\SND_TRANS\095596020\San Ysidro Yard Traffic Study\Synchro\BOWP PM.sy7 8/7/2009Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.


Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total 15 562 760Volume Left 15 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0cSH 173 1700 1700Volume to Capacity 0.09 0.33 0.45Queue Length 95th (ft) 7 0 0Control Delay (s) 27.8 0.0 0.0Lane LOS DApproach Delay (s) 27.8 0.0 0.0Approach LOS D


San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project2: E. Beyer Blvd & Hill St Timing Plan: PM



Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1Volume Total (vph) 606 393 192 39Volume Left (vph) 11 44 156 9Volume Right (vph) 167 7 30 16Hadj (s) -0.13 0.05 0.10 -0.17Departure Headway (s) 5.2 5.7 6.7 7.0Degree Utilization, x 0.88 0.62 0.36 0.08Capacity (veh/h) 675 604 499 451Control Delay (s) 34.2 17.5 13.4 10.5Approach Delay (s) 34.2 17.5 13.4 10.5Approach LOS D C B B

Intersection SummaryDelay 24.9HCM Level of Service CIntersection Capacity Utilization 53.3% ICU Level of Service AAnalysis Period (min) 15

San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project3: E. Beyer Blvd & Bolton Hall Rd Timing Plan: PM



Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1Volume Total 442 236 128Volume Left 0 68 91Volume Right 212 0 37cSH 1700 1118 469Volume to Capacity 0.26 0.06 0.27Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 5 27Control Delay (s) 0.0 2.9 15.5Lane LOS A CApproach Delay (s) 0.0 2.9 15.5Approach LOS C


San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project4: E. Beyer Blvd & Existing Dwy Timing Plan: PM





San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project5: E. San Ysidro Blvd & Center St Timing Plan: PM



Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 EB 3 WB 1 WB 2 SB 1Volume Total 137 668 668 833 549 191Volume Left 137 0 0 0 0 0Volume Right 0 0 0 0 132 191cSH 492 1700 1700 1700 1700 387Volume to Capacity 0.28 0.39 0.39 0.49 0.32 0.49Queue Length 95th (ft) 28 0 0 0 0 66Control Delay (s) 15.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.1Lane LOS C CApproach Delay (s) 1.4 0.0 23.1Approach LOS C


San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project6: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 NB Ramp Timing Plan: PM


Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBRLane ConfigurationsIdeal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00Frt 1.00 1.00 0.93 1.00 0.85Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 3298 1776 1583Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 3298 1776 1583Volume (vph) 202 1021 0 0 698 580 102 2 379 0 0 0Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.25 0.25 0.25Adj. Flow (vph) 210 1064 0 0 802 667 105 2 391 0 0 0RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 153 0 0 0 76 0 0 0Lane Group Flow (vph) 210 1064 0 0 1316 0 0 107 315 0 0 0Turn Type Prot Perm PermProtected Phases 7 4 8 2Permitted Phases 2 2Actuated Green, G (s) 10.0 43.0 29.0 26.0 26.0Effective Green, g (s) 10.0 43.0 29.0 26.0 26.0Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.56 0.38 0.34 0.34Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0Lane Grp Cap (vph) 446 1976 1242 600 535v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.30 c0.40v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 c0.20v/c Ratio 0.47 0.54 1.06 0.18 0.59Uniform Delay, d1 31.0 10.7 24.0 18.0 21.1Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.3 42.8 0.6 4.7Delay (s) 31.8 11.0 66.8 18.6 25.8Level of Service C B E B CApproach Delay (s) 14.5 66.8 24.3 0.0Approach LOS B E C A

Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 39.7 HCM Level of Service DHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80Actuated Cycle Length (s) 77.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.4% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

San Ysidro Facility Horizon Year Plus Project7: E. San Ysidro Blvd & I-805 SB Ramp Timing Plan: PM



Intersection SummaryHCM Average Control Delay 20.0 HCM Level of Service CHCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.54Actuated Cycle Length (s) 77.5 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.4% ICU Level of Service BAnalysis Period (min) 15c Critical Lane Group

APPENDIX C

SANDAG’s 2030 Forecast

APPENDIX D

7-Day Classification Counts


Datasets: Site: [9056.01] TRAIN YARD DRWY - ENTERING Direction: 7 - North bound A>B, South bound B>A., Lane: 0 Survey Duration: 10:37 Monday, July 13, 2009 => 11:43 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 File: C:\Users\Gus\True Count\Projects\9056 SAN YSIDRO\9056.0121Jul2009.EC0 (Regular) Profile: Filter time: 0:00 Tuesday, July 14, 2009 => 0:00 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 Speed range: 5 - 100 mph. Direction: North (bound) In profile: Vehicles = 82 / 215 (38.14%) * Tuesday, July 14, 2009 - Total=15, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300

0 1 0 0 0 2 2 1 3 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

AM Peak 0745 - 0845 (3), AM PHF=0.38 PM Peak 1315 - 1415 (2), PM PHF=0.50

* Wednesday, July 15, 2009 - Total=11, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300

0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 0 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 3

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0


* Thursday, July 16, 2009 - Total=22, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300

3 1 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 1 0 0 1 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 1

3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0


* Friday, July 17, 2009 - Total=17, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300

0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 1 1 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


* Saturday, July 18, 2009 - Total=0, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


* Sunday, July 19, 2009 - Total=1, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300

0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


* Monday, July 20, 2009 - Total=16, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300

0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 3 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1

0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 -

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -

AM Peak 0845 - 0945 (3), AM PHF=0.38


Datasets: Site: [9056.01] TRAIN YARD DRWY - EXITING Direction: 7 - North bound A>B, South bound B>A., Lane: 0 Survey Duration: 10:37 Monday, July 13, 2009 => 11:43 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 File: C:\Users\Gus\True Count\Projects\9056 SAN YSIDRO\9056.0121Jul2009.EC0 (Regular) Profile: Filter time: 0:00 Tuesday, July 14, 2009 => 0:00 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 Speed range: 5 - 100 mph. Direction: South (bound) In profile: Vehicles = 83 / 215 (38.60%) * Tuesday, July 14, 2009 - Total=20, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300

1 3 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0

0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


* Wednesday, July 15, 2009 - Total=9, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300

0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0


* Thursday, July 16, 2009 - Total=19, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300

2 2 0 0 2 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 1 3 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1

1 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0

1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


* Friday, July 17, 2009 - Total=21, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300

0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 3 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 2 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0


* Saturday, July 18, 2009 - Total=0, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


* Sunday, July 19, 2009 - Total=1, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300

0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


* Monday, July 20, 2009 - Total=13, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300

0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -

0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 -

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -

0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 -

AM Peak 0830 - 0930 (2), AM PHF=0.50

MetroCount Traffic Executive Daily Classes

DailyClass-1637 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [9056.01] TRAIN YARD DRWY - ENTERING Direction: 7 - North bound A>B, South bound B>A., Lane: 0 Survey Duration: 10:37 Monday, July 13, 2009 => 11:43 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 File: C:\Users\Gus\True Count\Projects\9056 SAN YSIDRO\9056.0121Jul2009.EC0 (Regular) Profile: Filter time: 0:00 Tuesday, July 14, 2009 => 0:00 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 5 - 100 mph. Direction: North (bound) In profile: Vehicles = 82 / 215 (38.14%)

Daily Classes DailyClass-1637 Site: 9056.01.0SN Description: TRAIN YARD DRWY Filter time: 0:00 Tuesday, July 14, 2009 => 0:00 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F2) Filter: Cls(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ) Dir(N) Sp(5,100) Headway(>0) Tuesday, July 14, 2009

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Total

Tue 1 6 4 0 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 15

(%) 6.7 40.0 26.7 0.0 13.3 6.7 0.0 0.0 6.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Wed 0 5 3 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11

(%) 0.0 45.5 27.3 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Thu 1 7 4 0 6 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 22

(%) 4.5 31.8 18.2 0.0 27.3 9.1 0.0 0.0 9.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Fri 0 6 7 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 17

(%) 0.0 35.3 41.2 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Sat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Sun 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

(%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Mon 2 5 6 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 16

(%) 12.5 31.3 37.5 0.0 6.3 6.3 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

MetroCount Traffic Executive Daily Classes

DailyClass-1638 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [9056.01] TRAIN YARD DRWY - EXITING Direction: 7 - North bound A>B, South bound B>A., Lane: 0 Survey Duration: 10:37 Monday, July 13, 2009 => 11:43 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 File: C:\Users\Gus\True Count\Projects\9056 SAN YSIDRO\9056.0121Jul2009.EC0 (Regular) Profile: Filter time: 0:00 Tuesday, July 14, 2009 => 0:00 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 5 - 100 mph. Direction: South (bound) In profile: Vehicles = 83 / 215 (38.60%)

Daily Classes DailyClass-1638 Site: 9056.01.0SN Description: TRAIN YARD DRWY Filter time: 0:00 Tuesday, July 14, 2009 => 0:00 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F2) Filter: Cls(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ) Dir(S) Sp(5,100) Headway(>0) Monday, July 13, 2009

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Total

Tue 1 8 6 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 20

(%) 5.0 40.0 30.0 0.0 15.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Wed 0 3 2 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 9

(%) 0.0 33.3 22.2 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Thu 1 4 7 0 4 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 19

(%) 5.3 21.1 36.8 0.0 21.1 10.5 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Fri 3 7 5 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 21

(%) 14.3 33.3 23.8 0.0 9.5 9.5 0.0 0.0 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Sat 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Sun 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

(%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Mon 1 7 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 13

(%) 7.7 53.8 15.4 0.0 7.7 7.7 0.0 0.0 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

APPENDIX E

Speed Data

MetroCount Traffic Executive Speed

SpeedText-1620 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [9056.02] BEYER BLVD (HILL ST-FILOI AVE) SOUTHBOUND Direction: 7 - North bound A>B, South bound B>A., Lane: 0 Survey Duration: 11:03 Monday, July 13, 2009 => 11:40 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 File: C:\Users\Gus\True Count\Projects\9056 SAN YSIDRO\9056.0221Jul2009.EC0 (Regular) Identifier: S1339PHE MC56-L5 [MC55] (c)Microcom 19Oct04 Algorithm: Factory default Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Filter time: 0:00 Tuesday, July 14, 2009 => 0:00 Wednesday, July 15, 2009 Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 5 - 100 mph. Direction: South (bound) Separation: All - (Headway) Name: TC Default Profile Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F2) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, lb, ton)

Column Legend: 0 [Time] 24-hour time (0000 - 2359) 1 [Total] Number in time step 2 [Vbin] Speed bin totals 3 [Mean] Average speed 4 [Vpp] Percentile speed

* Tuesday, July 14, 2009 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Mean Vpp

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 85

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80

0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - -

0015 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 38.1 -

0030 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 47.6 -

0045 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 41.1 -

0100 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 38.7 -

0115 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.4 -

0130 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.6 -

0145 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.4 -

0200 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.3 -

0215 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.9 -

0230 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.3 -

0245 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.6 -

0300 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.1 -

0315 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.0 -

0330 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.5 -

0345 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.8 -

0400 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.4 -

0415 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.2 -

0430 11 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 40.0 44.1

0445 9 0 0 0 0 1 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.7 -

0500 10 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.6 -

0515 6 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 39.9 -

0530 10 0 0 0 0 2 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.7 -

0545 18 0 0 0 0 2 4 4 6 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 39.0 43.8

0600 11 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 40.1 46.8

0615 13 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 40.5 47.4

0630 19 0 0 0 0 2 4 7 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.6 42.7

0645 17 0 0 0 2 3 0 6 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.6 42.5

0700 20 0 0 0 2 3 6 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.1 40.0

0715 30 0 0 0 1 6 7 8 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.3 41.6

0730 37 0 0 1 2 4 10 10 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.3 43.4

0745 38 0 0 0 3 1 11 11 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 36.8 42.9

[9056.02] BEYER BLVD (HILL ST-FILOI AVE) SOUTHBOUND


5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 85

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80

0800 23 0 0 0 0 1 6 11 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 37.0 41.4

0815 39 0 0 0 0 3 12 9 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.8 43.6

0830 35 0 0 0 1 4 14 10 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.5 41.8

0845 52 0 0 0 1 7 15 17 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.9 40.9

0900 38 0 0 1 0 1 6 21 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.1 40.7

0915 30 0 0 0 0 3 8 10 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.0 45.6

0930 30 0 0 0 0 4 10 7 4 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 37.0 47.0

0945 38 0 0 0 0 6 11 11 5 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 37.0 44.3

1000 22 0 0 0 1 1 5 8 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.7 45.2

1015 29 0 0 0 0 7 3 12 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.7 41.2

1030 31 0 0 0 2 4 7 11 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.7 42.3

1045 42 0 1 0 4 16 10 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.9 38.3

1100 42 0 0 0 3 9 10 15 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.0 39.4

1115 24 1 0 0 0 6 6 6 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.6 41.2

1130 42 0 0 0 1 5 12 21 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.2 39.1

1145 35 0 0 0 0 8 12 7 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.8 41.6

1200 34 1 0 0 1 6 7 14 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.9 39.4

1215 40 0 0 0 4 6 11 9 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.4 40.3

1230 41 0 0 0 3 5 15 9 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.0 42.1

1245 34 0 0 0 1 4 12 12 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.4 39.6

1300 41 0 0 0 0 8 19 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.9 37.6

1315 34 0 1 0 3 5 8 8 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.6 42.3

1330 33 0 0 0 1 3 18 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.0 37.6

1345 29 0 0 0 0 1 17 6 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.4 40.9

1400 37 0 0 1 0 1 12 15 6 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 36.9 40.5

1415 28 0 0 0 2 4 6 11 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.9 39.8

1430 31 0 0 0 1 10 6 5 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.4 40.9

1445 40 0 0 0 2 4 15 13 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.1 39.4

1500 41 0 0 0 2 4 14 17 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.5 38.7

1515 38 0 0 2 7 11 11 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.7 34.9

1530 40 0 0 1 5 12 12 6 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.1 35.8

1545 35 0 0 0 1 4 13 8 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.7 41.6

1600 52 0 1 0 1 4 17 17 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.5 41.2

1615 38 0 0 0 1 0 13 9 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.6 42.9

1630 37 0 0 1 3 3 15 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.1 37.8

1645 40 0 0 0 4 5 13 8 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 34.8 42.9

1700 45 0 0 0 1 10 20 8 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.3 37.1

1715 41 0 0 1 1 4 20 8 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.4 40.0

1730 40 0 0 0 0 5 14 15 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.4 39.4

1745 39 0 0 0 0 5 15 7 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.7 41.8

1800 49 0 0 0 2 11 14 14 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.5 40.0

1815 55 0 0 0 2 12 16 20 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.9 38.9

1830 55 0 0 0 1 9 22 15 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.8 38.9

1845 37 0 0 1 1 7 7 14 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.6 40.5

1900 21 0 0 1 3 6 3 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.8 40.0

1915 31 0 0 1 1 4 7 14 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 34.8 39.6

1930 36 0 0 0 1 7 11 8 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.1 42.1

1945 17 0 0 0 2 5 6 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.5 37.8

2000 27 0 0 0 1 6 9 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.8 37.8

2015 28 0 0 0 2 5 8 8 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.0 40.0

2030 19 0 0 0 1 2 7 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.8 38.7

2045 22 0 0 0 1 4 4 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.7 40.9

2100 13 0 0 0 0 3 4 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.2 43.2

2115 16 0 0 1 0 2 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.3 38.5

2130 16 0 0 0 1 0 6 5 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.2 44.5

2145 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.7 -

2200 5 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36.9 -

2215 12 0 0 0 0 0 2 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.5 41.4

2230 12 0 0 0 0 2 3 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.5 39.1

2245 4 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.6 -

2300 8 0 0 0 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.5 -

2315 8 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 38.6 -

2330 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39.7 -

2345 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.5 -

Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Mean Vpp

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 85

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80

07-19 1781 2 3 9 71 262 563 519 261 83 7 0 1 0 0 0 34.9 40.9

06-22 2094 2 3 12 86 314 641 618 307 99 11 0 1 0 0 0 34.9 40.9

06-00 2147 2 3 12 86 318 654 642 318 100 11 0 1 0 0 0 35.0 40.9

00-00 2255 2 3 12 87 331 681 675 339 110 13 1 1 0 0 0 35.1 41.2

In profile: Vehicles = 2255 / 6854 (32.90%)

MetroCount Traffic Executive Speed

SpeedText-1619 -- English (ENU) Datasets: Site: [9056.02] BEYER BLVD (HILL ST-FILOI AVE) NORTHBOUND Direction: 7 - North bound A>B, South bound B>A., Lane: 0 Survey Duration: 11:03 Monday, July 13, 2009 => 11:40 Tuesday, July 21, 2009 File: C:\Users\Gus\True Count\Projects\9056 SAN YSIDRO\9056.0221Jul2009.EC0 (Regular) Identifier: S1339PHE MC56-L5 [MC55] (c)Microcom 19Oct04 Algorithm: Factory default Data type: Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) Profile: Filter time: 0:00 Tuesday, July 14, 2009 => 0:00 Wednesday, July 15, 2009 Included classes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Speed range: 5 - 100 mph. Direction: North (bound) Separation: All - (Headway) Name: TC Default Profile Scheme: Vehicle classification (Scheme F2) Units: Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, lb, ton)

Column Legend: 0 [Time] 24-hour time (0000 - 2359) 1 [Total] Number in time step 2 [Vbin] Speed bin totals 3 [Mean] Average speed 4 [Vpp] Percentile speed


5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 85

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80

0000 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.2 -

0015 5 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.2 -

0030 7 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.7 -

0045 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.9 -

0100 7 0 0 0 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.1 -

0115 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 38.1 -

0130 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - -

0145 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.7 -

0200 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23.5 -

0215 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.9 -

0230 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.3 -

0245 5 0 0 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.8 -

0300 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.6 -

0315 4 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.5 -

0330 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39.9 -

0345 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.1 -

0400 7 0 0 0 1 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.5 -

0415 4 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.4 -

0430 6 0 0 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.1 -

0445 5 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.1 -

0500 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.7 -

0515 6 0 0 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.8 -

0530 7 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.9 -

0545 14 0 0 0 2 2 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.2 36.5

0600 12 0 1 0 0 3 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.5 38.9

0615 9 0 0 0 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.9 -

0630 9 0 0 0 0 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.5 -

0645 10 0 0 0 0 2 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.9 -

0700 11 0 0 0 2 3 0 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 34.5 39.8

0715 20 0 0 0 1 5 7 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.4 37.1

0730 25 0 0 0 2 9 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.5 36.5

0745 47 0 0 0 5 8 10 14 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.2 40.9

[9056.02] BEYER BLVD (HILL ST-FILOI AVE) NORTHBOUND * Tuesday, July 14, 2009 Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Mean Vpp

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 85

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80

0800 53 0 0 0 3 10 22 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.9 37.1

0815 44 0 0 0 0 7 21 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.7 36.9

0830 40 0 0 0 3 5 17 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.2 37.6

0845 37 0 0 0 3 7 14 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.9 38.5

0900 51 0 0 1 5 13 16 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.1 37.4

0915 29 0 0 0 0 9 8 6 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.3 41.6

0930 14 0 0 0 0 4 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.5 38.9

0945 21 0 0 0 1 2 9 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.9 38.7

1000 16 0 0 0 2 6 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.9 36.9

1015 17 0 0 0 1 4 5 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.9 37.4

1030 19 0 0 0 1 4 8 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.7 39.8

1045 21 0 1 1 2 7 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.5 34.9

1100 31 2 0 5 3 12 3 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26.6 35.3

1115 21 0 0 0 0 1 12 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.4 37.6

1130 26 0 0 1 3 5 9 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.4 37.6

1145 22 0 0 0 2 4 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.0 36.9

1200 30 0 0 0 1 9 10 7 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 33.2 39.1

1215 15 0 0 0 3 3 2 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.8 38.7

1230 20 0 0 0 1 9 4 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.8 35.8

1245 29 0 0 0 1 2 14 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.8 39.1

1300 25 0 0 0 0 6 8 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.5 36.2

1315 23 0 0 0 1 5 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.0 34.9

1330 27 0 0 1 3 4 11 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.7 36.5

1345 26 0 0 0 0 5 13 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.0 36.9

1400 23 0 0 0 1 4 8 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.0 40.0

1415 25 0 0 0 2 4 12 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.0 38.5

1430 29 0 0 0 0 9 13 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.1 39.1

1445 34 0 0 1 6 10 11 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29.7 35.8

1500 30 0 0 0 1 3 14 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.8 37.6

1515 22 0 0 0 1 5 9 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.8 37.4

1530 38 0 1 3 5 11 16 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28.5 32.4

1545 36 0 0 0 1 5 14 10 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.3 40.0

1600 34 0 0 0 0 9 17 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.9 37.6

1615 36 0 0 0 0 7 13 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.3 38.7

1630 36 0 0 0 1 7 11 11 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.3 40.3

1645 34 0 0 0 2 8 14 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.7 36.7

1700 37 0 0 0 2 6 12 11 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.2 38.5

1715 46 0 0 1 1 5 19 13 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.1 38.5

1730 46 0 0 0 3 10 18 11 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.7 36.9

1745 31 0 0 0 1 6 10 9 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.6 39.4

1800 32 0 0 0 1 6 8 12 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.6 38.0

1815 32 0 0 0 0 4 15 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.0 37.6

1830 33 0 0 0 2 5 17 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.6 37.4

1845 26 0 0 0 0 5 7 11 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.8 38.5

1900 20 0 0 0 1 5 5 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.6 39.6

1915 32 1 0 0 2 3 10 12 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.7 38.5

1930 30 0 0 0 4 4 10 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.6 38.9

1945 30 0 0 0 1 6 14 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.4 39.1

2000 27 0 0 0 6 3 11 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.6 37.6

2015 28 0 0 1 3 9 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.9 36.9

2030 21 0 0 0 1 4 9 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 33.6 36.9

2045 13 0 0 0 0 5 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.6 37.6

2100 14 0 0 0 1 5 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31.2 35.3

2115 21 0 0 0 1 9 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30.8 33.8

2130 12 0 0 0 0 1 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.5 38.5

2145 15 0 0 0 1 2 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.1 36.2

2200 10 0 0 0 0 1 5 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.9 -

2215 12 0 0 0 0 1 8 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35.1 37.4

2230 13 0 0 0 1 3 5 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.5 39.8

2245 19 0 0 0 0 2 10 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.7 39.4

2300 8 0 0 0 2 0 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.0 -

2315 9 0 0 0 0 2 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.7 -

2330 7 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34.4 -

2345 6 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32.8 -

Time Total Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Vbin Mean Vpp

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 85

10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80

07-19 1420 2 2 14 79 297 528 371 113 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 32.9 38.3

06-22 1723 3 3 15 100 361 644 449 131 14 2 1 0 0 0 0 32.9 38.3

06-00 1807 3 3 15 103 373 681 468 143 15 2 1 0 0 0 0 32.9 38.3

00-00 1911 3 4 17 113 390 713 502 148 18 2 1 0 0 0 0 32.9 38.3

In profile: Vehicles = 1911 / 6854 (27.88%)

San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement Project€¦ · 7-Day Classification Counts Appendix E Speed...

Documents

Transcript of San Ysidro Railroad Yard Improvement Project€¦ · 7-Day Classification Counts Appendix E Speed...