S MICHIGAN JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PATRICIA … · 2016. 2. 26. · JENNIFER...

JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM GOVERNOR

ST A T E O F MI C H I G A N DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

LA N S I N G

PATRICIA L. CARUSO DIRECTOR

GRANDVIEW PLAZA BUILDING • P.O. BOX 30003 • LANSING, MICHIGAN 48909 www.michigan.gov • (517) 335-1426

DATE: March 11, 2005

TO: Senate Judiciary Committee Members House Judiciary Committee Members Senate Judiciary and Corrections Appropriations Subcommittee Members House Corrections Appropriations Subcommittee Members

FROM: Heidi Washington Administrative Assistant

SUBJECT: Legislative Report on the Special Alternative Incarceration Program

Pursuant to the requirements of MCL 791.234a(9), the Department of Corrections has completed its 2004 Annual Report on the operation of the Special Alternative Incarceration (boot camp) program. This report can be viewed at www.michigan.gov/corrections.

c: Joan Yukins, FOA Jacques McNeely, DMB Bethany Wicksall, SFA Marilyn Peterson, HFA

CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES ADMINISTRATION

SPECIAL ALTERNATIVE INCARCERATION

ANNUAL REPORT

-2004-

Patricia L. Caruso, Director

REPORT HIGHLIGHTS

•636 male prisoners from 72 counties, and 86 female prisoners from 33 counties were enrolled in the program. 911 male probationers from 52 counties, and 32 female probationers from 15 counties were enrolled in the program. See pages 11 through 14. •24.8% of the male prisoners, 24.4% of the female prisoners, 27.7% of the male probationers, and 12.9% of the female probationers enrolled in the program were serving for drug related offenses. See pages 15 and 16 for a list of the offenses of which program participants were convicted. •503 male prisoners, 75 female prisoners, 727 male probationers, and 28 female probationers successfully completed the program. The successful completion rates were 88.7% for male prisoners, 97.4% for female prisoners, 87.9% for male probationers, and 96.6% for female probationers. See pages 11 through 14 for complete program results. •90.9% of the male prisoners, and 89.3% of the female prisoners, who graduated from the program in 2004 are currently on parole or have discharged from parole. 89.3% of the male probationers, and 85.7% of the female probationers, who graduated from the program in 2004 have either discharged from their sentence or are adjusting satisfactorily on probation. See pages 11 through 14 for the current status of all graduates. •The program is cost effective as compared to prison. See page 9. •57.4% of offenders who completed the battery of GED tests, earned their GED Certificates while enrolled in the program. See page 9.

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SAI Program Facts and Photos. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-5 History of the SAI Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Statutory Authority and Eligibility. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7-8 Program Cost Effectiveness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Evening Educational and Self-Help Programming. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9-10 Summary of 2004 Male Probationer Program Statistics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 Summary of 2004 Female Probationer Program Statistics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12 Summary of 2004 Male Prisoner Program Statistics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Summary of 2004 Female Prisoner Program Statistics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Probationer Admissions by Offense Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 Prisoner Admissions by Offense Type . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16 APPENDICES A-M A. 2004 Admissions by County - Probationer B. 2004 Admissions by County - Prisoner C. 2004 Admissions by Month D. 2004 Admissions by Sex E. 2004 Monthly Population Totals F. 2004 Program Outcomes by County - Probationer G. 2004 Program Outcomes by County - Prisoner H. 2004 Monthly Program Outcomes - Prisoner I. 2004 Monthly Program Outcomes - Probationer J. 2004 Graduates by Sex K. Comparative Program Outcomes - 2004 and 2003 L. Current Status of Prisoner Program Graduates M. Comparative Status of Probationer Graduates - 2004 and 2003

SPECIAL ALTERNATIVE INCARCERATION (SAI) PROGRAM

FACTS AND PHOTOS 1. What is SAI? SAI is a program for felony offenders who satisfy statutory eligibility

criteria. It is designed to provide Michigan’s felony sentencing courts and the Department of Corrections an alternative to prison in the management of qualified offenders.

2. What are the goals of the SAI Program? The program has two primary goals. First, it

promotes public safety through risk management in the selection of program participants and supervision strategies which gradually reintegrate offenders back into the community. Second, the program provides participants the opportunity to change their anti-social attitudes, criminal lifestyles, and prepare themselves for re-entry into the community as productive, law-abiding citizens.

3. How does the SAI Program accomplish its goals? The SAI Program accomplishes its

goals by achieving the following objectives:

(1) It strips from participants their pride in socially unacceptable behavior through the use of techniques adapted from the military;

(2) It teaches a principle-based value system from which participants gain direction;

(3) It assists participants in improving their ability to successfully re-enter the

community through achievements in programming, physical conditioning, work programs, personal and social development;

(4) It assists participants in learning self-discipline through immediate and complete

compliance with program rules and orders issued by staff;

(5) It assists participants in achieving a sense of personal responsibility by holding them accountable for their behavior and by requiring them to help other participants in the program;

(6) It teaches participants a positive work ethic by requiring them to work in

programs which benefit the community and provide a sense of personal accomplishment;

(7) It teaches participants how to prepare a resume and how to present themselves

when applying for a job; (8) At graduation parolees/probationers are reunited with families and are required to

go through 120 days of intensive supervision to ensure they are introduced to needed community services/resources;

1

4. What is “Special Alternative Incarceration”? It is a 90 day (military type) school that consists of work, educational programming leading to the General Educational Development (GED) certificate, substance abuse education, with courses in anger management, life coping skills, and job seeking skills.

5. What happens to participants after graduation? Following program completion most parolees/probationers are placed directly on parole or probation with the first 120 days served under intensive supervision. Those who do not have appropriate housing placement will be placed in a residential aftercare facility until appropriate placement can be arranged.

6. Where is the SAI Program? The program is located at Camp Cassidy Lake, a 360 bed

facility operated by the Michigan Department of Corrections which is approximately three miles north of the Village of Chelsea, midway between Ann Arbor and Jackson. The facility is staffed by 129 employees

2

During intake, the false pride many offenders take in their past criminal behavior is stripped away from them. Here they become trainees and staff begin introducing them to socially acceptable behavior.

As part of the process of developing a healthy lifestyle and improving their self esteem and physical stamina, offenders participate in a daily motivational run, which is led by staff. Group activities such as physical conditioning also assist in creating an esprit de corp among trainees.

The SAI Program teaches trainees good work habits and a positive attitude toward work by involving them in meaningful in-camp work assignments and in public works projects in the community. The first in-camp assignment on which offenders are placed is cutting wood which is used to heat housing units and other buildings at the Cassidy Lake facility. Public works activities, such as maintaining public recreational areas and working in a local recycling facility, provide a valuable public service and enable trainees to experience the satisfaction which results from completing meaningful work assignments.

3

Trainees eat three nutritious meals daily and receive an evening snack to enable them to meet the mental and physical demands of the program.

Trainees learn self-discipline and teamwork by maintaining their living areas according to exacting standards. Inspections are conducted daily.

4

The 90 day program is voluntary. Probationers who are terminated as voluntary withdrawals or rule violators are returned to their sentencing county and face the possibility of going to prison. Prisoners are returned to a prison facility to serve the remainder of their sentence.

At the completion of the 90 day program, graduates are acknowledged by staff. Family members come to the facility to observe graduation and be united with their graduate.

5

THE HISTORY OF THE SPECIAL ALTERNATIVE INCARCERATION (SAI) PROGRAM IN MICHIGAN

Michigan’s Special Alternative Incarceration (SAI) Program was inspired by and patterned after a combination of Military Officers Candidate School and Military Recruit Training. In 1988, Senators Jack Welborn, Nick Smith and, James Barcia, with the support of other bi-partisin legislators, sponsored legislation to establish the SAI Program as an alternative to prison. Existing laws were amended to allow judges to sentence probationers to SAI as a condition of probation and to establish criteria for participation in the program. In March, 1988, Camp Sauble, a minimum security prison camp for males located in the northwestern part of Michigan’s Lower Peninsula, was designated as the first SAI camp. It had a capacity of 120 beds. The program operated at this capacity until 1991 and, because of its popularity, developed a large waiting list of potential candidates. The large waiting list, together with legislative acceptance of the program as a viable alternative to prison, resulted in the introduction of legislation to expand eligibility. In the spring of 1992, legislation expanding eligibility criteria to include male prisoners and female probationers and prisoners was enacted. In anticipation of the passage of this legislation, in June, 1991, the Cassidy Lake Technical School, a minimum security prison camp for males located in a rural area of the southeastern part of Michigan’s Lower Peninsula approximately 50 miles from Detroit, was converted into a boot camp. The capacity of this facility was established at 360 beds. In September 1991 Camp Manistique opened in Schoolcraft County with a capacity of 120 beds. In June, 1993, Camp Sauble and Camp Manistique were converted back into minimum security prison camps and the Cassidy Lake facility became the Department’s only SAI facility. The consolidation at the Cassidy Lake facility significantly reduced the per diem cost of placement in the program and facilitated improved internal control of operations. It also assisted in the recruitment and retention of minority staff members, thereby enhancing the Department’s efforts to maintain a diverse work force. In January, 1995, legislation was passed which eliminated the 25 year age limitation for probationers

6

STATUTORY AUTHORITY AND ELIGIBILITY The probationer portion of the program is authorized by Public Act 426 of 1994. The prisoner portion of the program is authorized by Public Act 427 of 1994. The eligibility criteria for placement in the program are summarized as follows: Prisoner: 1. Has never previously been placed in the program as a probationer or prisoner, unless

removed for medical reasons; 2. is physically able to participate in the program; 3. has no evidence of a mental handicap which would prevent participation in the program; 4. has not previously served a prison sentence; 5. is serving an indeterminate sentence(s) with a minimum term of 36 months or less or, if

serving for Breaking and Entering of an Occupied Dwelling or Home Invasion, a minimum term of 24 months or less;

6. has not been convicted of a crime involving unlawful sexual behavior, arson, a death or a

crime in which a life sentence is possible; 7. does not screen very high or potentially very high assault risk; 8. does not have a confinement or management security classification level of level IV or

higher; 9. does not have pending felony detainer or a pending felony charge; 10. if serving a sentence for conviction of MCL 333.7401 or MCL 333.7403, must have

served his/her statutory minimum if s/he has previously been convicted under either MCL 333.7401 or MCL 333.7403 (2) (a), (b), or (e);

11. if serving a sentence for conviction of MCL 750.227b (Felony Firearm Law) followed by

an indeterminate sentence, s/he must have served the two year gun law sentence and have a total minimum term of 36 months or less, including the gun law sentence.

Probationer: 1. Has never served a sentence of imprisonment in a state correctional facility; 2. would likely have been sentenced to prison in a state correctional facility;

7

3. the felony sentencing guidelines upper limit for the recommended minimum sentence for the offense is 12 months or more unless the offense is not covered by the felony sentencing guidelines or the offender is a probation violator;

4. is physically able to participate in the program; 5. has no evidence of a mental handicap which would prevent participation in the program; 6. has no pending felonies; 7. is not being sentenced for conviction of or the attempt to commit any of the following:

Child Pornography (MCLA 750.145c), Burning Dwelling House (MCLA 750.72), Burning of Other Real Property (MCLA 750.73), Burning of Insured Property (MCLA 750.75), 1st, 2nd, or 3rd degree Criminal Sexual Conduct (MCLA 750.520 b, c, d) or Assault With Intent to Commit Criminal Sexual Conduct (MCLA 750.520g);

8. is not being sentenced for a crime for which probation is not available by statute (i.e.,

murder, treason, armed robbery) or for a major controlled substance offense except in cases where life probation may be imposed.

8

PROGRAM COST EFFECTIVENESS During fiscal year 2004, the appropriated per diem cost of the male program was $78.55 (based upon a population of 360 offenders). The cost of the 90 day program was $7,070 per offender. Although the daily program cost is higher than the $57.18 cost of incarcerating a male offender in a level I security prison (including health care costs), the total annual cost of supervising a male offender in the program is significantly less than the $20,871 cost of supervising him in a level I security prison. If each of the 503 male prisoners and 727 male probationers who successfully completed the program during 2004 had been confined in a level I security prison for the entire year, the cost of their incarceration would have been $25,671,330. This exceeds the appropriated cost of operating the male program by $16,184,690. During fiscal year 2004, the appropriated per diem cost of the female program was $78.55 (based upon a population of 360 offenders). The cost of the 90 day program was $7,070 per offender. Not only is the daily program cost less than the $79.00 cost of incarcerating a female offender in the Scott Correctional Facility (including health care costs), the total annual cost of supervising a female offender in the program is significantly less than the $28,835 cost of supervising her in prison. If each of the 75 prisoners and 28 probationers who successfully completed the program during 2004 had been confined in the Scott Correctional Facility for the entire year, the cost of their incarceration would have been $2,970,005. This exceeds the appropriated cost of operating the female program by $2,135,745.

EVENING EDUCATIONAL AND SELF-HELP PROGRAMMING

While enrolled in the program, all 1656 offenders admitted in 2004, participated in classes in substance abuse awareness, life skills, anger management, job-seeking skills, job preparation, interpersonal skills, and current events. Seven hundred sixty two (46.0% of all admissions), earned their high school diploma, or received their GED prior to their admission into SAI. Eight hundred ninety four offenders (54.0% of all admissions) who had not graduated from high school or earned their General Educational Development (GED) Certificate were enrolled in Adult Basic Education (ABE) programming. As a result of this programming, 342 offenders (57.4% of those completing all mandatory GED test modules) earned their GED Certificates. One hundred seventy seven offenders, who did not have the academic skills necessary to take the GED test as determined by Test of Adult Basic Education (TABE), were enrolled in academic education classes. Program graduates who have completed a portion of the GED test battery are enrolled in adult education programs in the community during the residential aftercare portion of the program.

Trainees take the Test of Adult Basic Education (TABE) during the orientation phase of the boot camp. Those who have not earned a high school diploma or GED certificate and those whose academic skills have fallen below the high school level are enrolled in academic education classes during the evenings.

9

The evening educational program places responsibility for success upon trainees. In 2004, 57.4% of those who completed the GED test, earned their GED certificates during the 90 day program.

All trainees participate in substance abuse awareness programming. In 2004, 24.8% of the male prisoners, 24.4% of the female prisoners, 27.7% of the male probationers, and 12.9% of the female probationers placed in the program were serving for drug related offenses.

As part of their preparation to become responsible citizens, trainees participate in classes in current events .

10

SUMMARY OF 2004 MALE PROBATIONER PROGRAM STATISTICS

Male probationer program statistics for 2004 are presented in the attached appendices. These key data are summarized as follows:

Of the 911 probationers enrolled in the program:

1. 446 (49.0%) were African-American 2. 449 (49.3%) were Caucasian 3. 8 ( 0.9%) were Hispanic 4. 8 ( 0.9%) were of other races

Probationers sentenced in 52 counties enrolled in the program.

Probationer age at sentencing ranged from 16 years to 52 years, with the 17-22 year age group comprising 62.3% of all admissions.

As of December 31, 2004, 178 male probationers were enrolled in the program.

Of the 827 probationers who either completed or were terminated from the program:

1. 727 (87.9%) successfully completed the program 2. 43 ( 5.2%) voluntarily withdrew 3. 57 ( 6.9%) were terminated as rule violators

Eighty one probationers were terminated for medical reasons, and 21 probationers were terminated as unqualified.

Of the 727 probationers who successfully completed the program in 2004:

1. 649 (89.3%) are on probation or have completed probation 2. 64 ( 8.8%) have been re-sentenced to prison as probation violators 3. 12 ( 1.7%) have been re-sentenced to prison as probation violators with a new convictions 4. 2 ( 0.3%) have been sentenced to prison for crimes committed after completing probation

The Sentencing Guidelines for the 911 male probationers enrolled into the program are as follows:

Imprisonment Cell : Any cell in which the minimum of the cell range is more than 12 months. 55 ( 6.0%)

Straddle Cell: Any cell in which the maximum of the range exceeds 18 months and the minimum of the range is 12 months or less. 217 (23.8%)

Intermediate Sanction Cell: Special Alternative Incarceration is among those options given under Intermediate Sanction. 153 (16.8%)

Probation Violation: Is not governed by sentencing guidelines. The sentence for a probation violation is left to the judge’s discretion. 475 (52.1%)

No Guidelines: Crimes with no numerical score. 11 ( 1.2%)

11

SUMMARY OF 2004 FEMALE PROBATIONER PROGRAM STATISTICS Female probationer program statistics for 2004 are presented in the attached appendices. These key data are summarized as follows: Of the 32 probationers enrolled in the program: 1. 16 (50.0%) were African-American 2. 15 (46.9%) were Caucasian 3. 0 ( 0.0%) were Hispanic 4. 1 ( 3.1%) were of other races Probationers sentenced in 15 counties enrolled in the program. Probationer age at sentencing ranged from 19 years to 43 years, with the 17-22 year age group comprising 41.4% of all admissions. As of December 31, 2004, 11 female probationers were enrolled in the program. Of the 29 probationers who either completed or were terminated from the program: 1. 28 (96.6%) successfully completed the program 2. 0 ( 0.0%) voluntarily withdrew 3. 1 ( 3.4%) were terminated as rule violators Two probationers were terminated for medical reasons, and 1 probationer was terminated as unqualified. Of the 28 probationers who successfully completed the program in 2004: 1. 24 (85.7%) are on probation or have completed probation 2. 4 (14.3%) have been re-sentenced to prison as probation violators 3. 0 ( 0.0%) have been re-sentenced to prison as probation violators with a new convictions 4. 0 ( 0.0%) have been sentenced to prison for crimes committed after completing probation The Sentencing Guidelines for the 31 female probationers enrolled into the program are as follows: Imprisonment Cell 1 ( 3.2%) Straddle Cell 6 (19.4%) Intermediate sanction Cell 6 (19.4%) Probation Violations 18 (58.1%) No Guidelines 0 ( 0.0%)

12

SUMMARY OF 2004 MALE PRISONER PROGRAM STATISTICS Male prisoner program statistics for 2004 are presented in the attached appendices. These key data are summarized as follows: Of the 636 prisoners enrolled in the program: 1. 197 (31.0%) were African-American 2. 420 (66.0%) were Caucasian 3. 8 ( 1.3%) were Hispanic 4. 11 ( 1.7%) were of other races Prisoners sentenced in 72 counties enrolled in the program. Prisoner age at sentencing ranged from 16 years to 54 years, with the 17-22 year age group comprising 34.7% of all admissions. As of December 31, 2004, 110 prisoners were enrolled in the program. Of the 567 prisoners who either completed or were terminated from the program: 1. 503 (88.7%) successfully completed the program 2. 48 ( 8.5%) voluntarily withdrew 3. 16 ( 2.8%) were terminated as rule violators Thirty eight prisoners were terminated for medical reasons, and 13 prisoners were terminated as unqualified. Of the 503 prisoners who successfully completed the program in 2004: 1. 457 (90.09%) are currently on parole, or have discharged from parole. 2. 29 ( 5.8%) have returned to prison as parole violators 3. 4 ( 0.8%) have re-paroled after being returned as parole violators 4. 13 ( 2.6%) have returned to prison as parole violators with new convictions

13

SUMMARY OF 2004 FEMALE PRISONER PROGRAM STATISTICS

Female prisoner program statistics for 2004 are presented in the attached appendices. These key data are summarized as follows: Of the 86 prisoners enrolled in the program: 1. 25 (29.1%) were African-American 2. 60 (69.8%) were Caucasian 3. 1 ( 1.2%) were Hispanic 4. 0 ( 0.0%) were of other races Prisoners sentenced in 33 counties enrolled in the program. Prisoner age at sentencing ranged from 19 years to 56 years, with the 17-22 year age group comprising 10.3% of all admissions. As of December 31, 2004, 7 female prisoners were enrolled in the program. Of the 77 female prisoners who either completed or were terminated from the program: 1. 75 (97.4%) successfully completed the program 2. 1 ( 1.3%) voluntarily withdrew 3. 1 ( 1.3%) was terminated as a rule violator Eight female prisoners were terminated for medical reasons, and 1 female prisoner was terminated as unqualified. Of the 75 female prisoners who successfully completed the program in 2004: 1. 1 ( 1.3%) has been discharged from parole. 2. 66 (88.0%) are currently on parole, or have discharged from parole. 3. 6 ( 8.0%) have returned to prison as parole violators 4. 2 ( 2.7%) have re-paroled after being returned as parole violators 5. 0 ( 0.0%) have returned to prison as parole violators with new convictions

14

PROBATIONER ADMISSIONS BY OFFENSE TYPE

The sentence for each of the 911 male and 32 female probationers who entered the program during 2004 was used for the groupings listed below. For probationers serving more than one sentence, the sentence entered into the database first is listed. Each of the following offense type groupings contains offenses which are similar in nature. For example, the “Fraud” category contains all cases involving financial transactions where trickery or deceit was an element of the crime. OFFENSE TYPE PERCENT OF TOTAL Males Females 1. Breaking & Entering 22.8% 16.1% 2. Drug Offenses 27.7% 12.9% 3. Larceny 11.5% 6.5% 4. Assault 11.1% 9.7% 5. Unauthorized Driving 9.7% 6.5% 6. Fraud 3.2% 29.0% 7. Weapons 4.3% 0.0% 8. Robbery 4.1% 9.7% 9. Miscellaneous 2.7% 9.7% 10. Larceny From Persons 3.0% 0.0%

15

PRISONER ADMISSIONS BY OFFENSE TYPE

The controlling sentence for each of the 636 male and 86 female prisoners who entered the program during 2004 was used for the groupings listed below. For prisoners serving more than one sentence, the sentence with the longest minimum term is the controlling sentence. Each of the following offense type groupings contains offenses which are similar in nature. For example, the "Fraud" category contains all cases involving financial transactions where trickery or deceit was an element of the crime. OFFENSE TYPE PERCENT OF TOTAL Males Females 1. Drug Offenses 24.8% 24.4% 2. Breaking & Entering 23.0% 6.4% 3. Assault 10.2% 11.5% 4. Unauthorized driving 15.6% 9.0% 5. Robbery 4.1% 6.4% 6. Larceny 8.0% 9.0% 7. Fraud 6.3% 28.2% 8. Weapons 4.1% 0.0% 9. Miscellaneous 2.2% 3.5% 10. Larceny From Persons 1.6% 1.3%

16

Appendix A - 2004 ADMISSIONS BY COUNTY –PROBATIONER

MALES FEMALES Sentencing Number of % of Total Sentencing Number of % of Total County Admissions Admissions County Admissions Admissions Alcona 2 0.2% Alcona 0 0.0% Alger 0 0.0% Alger 0 0.0% Allegan 0 0.2% Allegan 0 0.0% Alpena 0 0.3% Alpena 0 0.0% Antrim 0 0.0% Antrim 0 0.0% Arenac 2 0.2% Arenac 0 0.0% Baraga 0 0.0% Baraga 0 0.0% Barry 0 0.1% Barry 0 0.0% Bay 13 1.4% Bay 1 3.2% Benzie 0 0.0% Benzie 0 0.0% Berrien 29 3.2% Berrien 1 3.2% Branch 2 0.2% Branch 0 0.0% Calhoun 5 0.5% Calhoun 0 0.0% Cass 1 0.1% Cass 1 3.2% Charleviox 0 0.0% Charleviox 0 0.0% Cheboygan 1 0.1% Cheboygan 0 0.0% Chippewa 0 0.0% Chippewa 0 0.0% Clare 0 0.0% Clare 0 0.0% Clinton 5 0.5% Clinton 0 0.0% Crawford 1 0.1% Crawford 0 0.0% Delta 0 0.0% Delta 0 0.0% Dickinson 0 0.0% Dickinson 0 0.0% Eaton 13 1.4% Eaton 0 0.0% Emmet 0 0.0% Emmet 0 0.0% Genesee 102 11.2% Genesee 3 9.7% Gladwin 3 0.3% Gladwin 0 0.0% Gogebic 0 0.0% Gogebic 0 0.0% Grand Traverse 6 0.7% Grand Traverse 0 0.0% Gratiot 1 0.1% Gratiot 0 0.0% Hillsdale 2 0.2% Hillsdale 0 0.0% Houghton 0 0.0% Houghton 0 0.0% Huron 0 0.0% Huron 0 0.0% Ingham 20 2.2% Ingham 0 0.0% Ionia 5 0.5% Ionia 2 6.5% Iosco 0 0.0% Iosco 0 0.0% Iron 0 0.0% Iron 0 0.0% Isabella 6 0.7% Isabella 1 3.2% Jackson 21 2.3% Jackson 1 3.2% Kalamazoo 43 4.7% Kalamazoo 2 6.5% Kalkaska 0 0.0% Kalkaska 0 0.0% Kent 48 5.3% Kent 0 0.0% Keweenaw 0 0.0% Keweenaw 0 0.0% Lake 5 0.5% Lake 0 0.0% Lapeer 6 0.7% Lapeer 0 0.0%

Appendix A - 2004 ADMISSIONS BY COUNTY –PROBATIONER – Cont.

MALES FEMALES Sentencing Number of % of Total Sentencing Number of % of Total County Admissions Admissions County Admissions Admissions Leelanau 2 0.2% Leelanau 0 0.0% Lenawee 3 0.3% Lenawee 0 0.0% Livingston 16 1.8% Livingston 0 0.0% Luce 0 0.0% Luce 0 0.0% Mackinac 0 0.0% Mackinac 0 0.0% Macomb 73 8.0% Macomb 1 3.2% Manistee 1 0.1% Manistee 0 0.0% Marquette 0 0.0% Marquette 0 0.0% Mason 3 0.3% Mason 0 0.0% Mecosta 1 0.1% Mecosta 0 0.0% Menominee 1 0.1% Menominee 0 0.0% Midland 1 0.1% Midland 0 0.0% Missaukee 0 0.0% Missaukee 0 0.0% Monroe 8 0.9% Monroe 0 0.0% Montcalm 4 0.4% Montcalm 0 0.0% Montmorency 4 0.4% Montmorency 0 0.0% Muskegon 41 4.5% Muskegon 5 16.1% Newaygo 1 0.1% Newaygo 0 0.0% Oakland 47 5.2% Oakland 2 6.5% Oceana 2 0.2% Oceana 1 3.2% Ogemaw 1 0.1% Ogemaw 0 0.0% Ontonagon 0 0.0% Ontonagon 0 0.0% Osceola 4 0.4% Osceola 0 0.0% Oscoda 0 0.0% Oscoda 0 0.0% Otsego 1 0.1% Otsego 0 0.0% Ottawa 7 0.8% Ottawa 0 0.0% Presque Isle 0 0.1% Presque Isle 0 0.0% Roscommon 2 0.2% Roscommon 0 0.0% Saginaw 41 4.5% Saginaw 1 3.2% St. Clair 31 3.4% St. Clair 0 0.0% St. Joseph 0 0.0% St. Joseph 0 0.0% Sanilac 2 0.2% Sanilac 0 0.0% Schoolcraft 0 0.0% Schoolcraft 0 0.0% Shiawassee 8 0.9% Shiawassee 0 0.0% Tuscola 0 0.6% Tuscola 0 0.0% Van Buren 5 0.5% Van Buren 0 0.0% Washtenaw 52 5.7% Washtenaw 4 12.9% Wayne 207 22.7% Wayne 5 16.1% Wexford 0 0.0% Wexford 0 0.0% Totals 911 100.0% 32 100.0%

Appendix B - 2004 ADMISSIONS BY COUNTY –PRISONER

MALES FEMALES Sentencing Number of % of Total Sentencing Number of % of Total County Admissions Admissions County Admissions Admissions Alcona 1 0.2% Alcona 0 0.0% Alger 1 0.2% Alger 0 0.0% Allegan 13 2.0% Allegan 1 1.2% Alpena 5 0.8% Alpena 0 0.0% Antrim 3 0.5% Antrim 0 0.0% Arenac 0 0.0% Arenac 0 0.0% Baraga 1 0.2% Baraga 0 0.0% Barry 5 0.8% Barry 0 0.0% Bay 13 2.0% Bay 1 1.2% Benzie 3 0.5% Benzie 0 0.0% Berrien 26 4.1% Berrien 5 5.8% Branch 1 0.2% Branch 0 0.0% Calhoun 24 3.8% Calhoun 1 1.2% Cass 2 0.3% Cass 0 0.0% Charleviox 1 0.2% Charleviox 1 1.2% Cheboygan 1 0.2% Cheboygan 0 0.0% Chippewa 1 0.2% Chippewa 0 0.0% Clare 1 0.2% Clare 0 0.0% Clinton 4 0.6% Clinton 0 0.0% Crawford 2 0.3% Crawford 0 0.0% Delta 0 0.0% Delta 0 0.0% Dickinson 3 0.5% Dickinson 0 0.0% Eaton 8 1.3% Eaton 0 0.0% Emmet 3 0.5% Emmet 1 1.2% Genesee 44 6.9% Genesee 11 12.8% Gladwin 0 0.0% Gladwin 0 0.0% Gogebic 1 0.2% Gogebic 0 0.0% Grand Traverse 18 2.8% Grand Traverse 0 0.0% Gratiot 6 0.9% Gratiot 1 1.2% Hillsdale 20 3.1% Hillsdale 3 3.5% Houghton 0 0.0% Houghton 0 0.0% Huron 0 0.0% Huron 0 0.0% Ingham 15 2.4% Ingham 2 2.3% Ionia 5 0.8% Ionia 1 1.2% Iosco 0 0.0% Iosco 0 0.0% Iron 0 0.0% Iron 0 0.0% Isabella 4 0.6% Isabella 2 2.3% Jackson 27 4.2% Jackson 10 11.6% Kalamazoo 13 2.0% Kalamazoo 1 1.2% Kalkaska 3 0.5% Kalkaska 0 0.0% Kent 60 9.4% Kent 8 9.3% Keweenaw 0 0.0% Keweenaw 0 0.0% Lake 1 0.2% Lake 0 0.0% Lapeer 2 0.3% Lapeer 0 0.0%

Appendix B - 2004 ADMISSIONS BY COUNTY –PRISONER – Cont.

MALES FEMALES Sentencing Number of % of Total Sentencing Number of % of Total County Admissions Admissions County Admissions Admissions Leelanau 2 0.3% Leelanau 0 0.0% Lenawee 12 1.9% Lenawee 5 5.8% Livingston 8 1.3% Livingston 1 1.2% Luce 4 0.6% Luce 0 0.0% Mackinac 1 0.2% Mackinac 0 0.0% Macomb 33 5.2% Macomb 5 5.8% Manistee 5 0.8% Manistee 1 1.2% Marquette 1 0.2% Marquette 0 0.0% Mason 1 0.2% Mason 0 0.0% Mecosta 3 0.5% Mecosta 0 0.0% Menominee 1 0.2% Menominee 0 0.0% Midland 1 0.2% Midland 0 0.0% Missaukee 2 0.3% Missaukee 0 0.0% Monroe 13 2.0% Monroe 1 1.2% Montcalm 13 2.0% Montcalm 1 1.2% Montmorency 0 0.0% Montmorency 0 0.0% Muskegon 6 0.9% Muskegon 1 1.2% Newaygo 5 0.8% Newaygo 1 1.2% Oakland 51 8.0% Oakland 5 5.8% Oceana 1 0.2% Oceana 0 0.0% Ogemaw 0 0.0% Ogemaw 0 0.0% Ontonagon 0 0.0% Ontonagon 0 0.0% Osceola 1 0.2% Osceola 1 1.2% Oscoda 1 0.2% Oscoda 0 0.0% Otsego 2 0.3% Otsego 0 0.0% Ottawa 4 0.6% Ottawa 2 2.3% Presque Isle 3 0.5% Presque Isle 1 1.2% Roscommon 5 0.8% Roscommon 0 0.0% Saginaw 6 0.9% Saginaw 0 0.0% St. Clair 5 0.8% St. Clair 1 1.2% St. Joseph 5 0.8% St. Joseph 0 0.0% Sanilac 3 0.5% Sanilac 0 0.0% Schoolcraft 1 0.2% Schoolcraft 0 0.0% Shiawassee 3 0.5% Shiawassee 1 1.2% Tuscola 3 0.5% Tuscola 0 0.0% Van Buren 12 1.9% Van Buren 1 1.2% Washtenaw 16 2.5% Washtenaw 1 1.2% Wayne 57 9.0% Wayne 7 8.1% Wexford 5 0.8% Wexford 1 1.2% Totals 636 100.0% 86 100.0%

43

93

14

4

69

83

11

2

61

87

8

2

58

95

9

4

62

71

6

1

45

69

64

35

80

32

7173

6 3

47

70

7

3

6061

13

44

60

52

41

69

2 1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

2004 ADMISSIONS BY MONTH

Male PrisonerMale probationerFemale Prisoner

Female Probationer

Appendix C

911

636

31

78

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

Male Probationers

Male Prisoners

Female Probationer

Female Prisoner

2004 ADMISSIONS BY SEX

Male Priosners Male Probationers Female Probationer Female Priosner

Appendix D

2004 MONTHLY POPULATION TOTALS

78

206

2112

109

212

28

10

128

236

32

9

143

230

27

10

148

228

23

9

127

203

2112

113

203

1510

120

187

13 11

118

182

1710

148

168

14 12

112

157

1111

110

178

7 11

0

50

100

150

200

250

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Male Prisoners Male Probationers Female Prisoners Female Probationers

Appendix E -

Appendix F - 2004 PROGRAM OUTCOMES BY COUNTY – MALE PROBATIONER

Successful Rule Voluntary Medical Unqualified Totals Completion Violator Withdrawal Termination Alcona 1 0 0 0 0 1 Alger 0 0 0 0 0 0 Allegan 0 0 0 0 0 0 Alpena 1 0 0 0 0 1 Antrim 0 0 0 0 0 0 Arenac 2 0 0 0 0 2 Baraga 0 0 0 0 0 0 Barry 1 0 0 0 0 1 Bay 15 0 0 0 0 15 Benzie 1 0 0 0 0 1 Berrien 28 1 2 1 0 32 Branch 2 0 0 0 0 2 Calhoun 5 0 0 0 0 5 Cass 1 0 0 0 0 1 Charleviox 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cheboygan 1 0 0 0 1 2 Chippewa 0 0 0 0 0 0 Clare 0 0 0 0 0 0 Clinton 7 0 1 0 0 8 Crawford 1 0 0 0 0 1 Delta 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dickinson 0 0 0 0 0 0 Eaton 7 1 1 2 0 11 Emmet 0 0 0 0 0 0 Genesee 64 15 3 10 4 96 Gladwin 3 0 0 0 0 3 Gogebic 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Traverse 1 0 1 2 0 4 Gratiot 1 0 0 0 0 1 Hillsdale 2 0 0 0 0 2 Houghton 0 0 0 0 0 0 Huron 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ingham 16 1 2 3 0 22 Ionia 3 0 0 0 0 3 Iosco 0 0 0 0 0 0 Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 Isabella 7 0 0 0 0 7 Jackson 16 0 0 2 0 18 Kalamazoo 33 2 4 1 3 43 Kalkaska 0 0 0 0 0 0 Kent 36 3 1 7 1 48 Keweenaw 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lake 5 0 0 1 0 6 Lapeer 4 0 0 0 0 4

Appendix F – 2004 PROGRAM OUTCOMES BY COUNTY – MALE PROBATIONER –Cont.

Successful Rule Voluntary Medical Unqualified Totals Completion Violator Withdrawal Termination Leelanau 2 0 0 0 0 2 Lenawee 5 0 0 0 0 5 Livingston 10 0 2 0 0 12 Luce 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mackinac 0 0 0 0 0 0 Macomb 60 4 2 9 1 76 Manistee 0 0 0 0 0 0 Marquette 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mason 3 0 0 0 0 3 Mecosta 1 0 0 0 0 1 Menominee 0 1 0 0 0 1 Midland 1 0 0 0 0 1 Missaukee 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monroe 12 0 0 1 0 13 Montcalm 2 0 1 0 0 3 Montmorency 2 0 0 1 0 3 Muskegon 28 1 1 2 0 32 Newaygo 0 1 0 0 0 1 Oakland 45 2 4 4 3 58 Oceana 2 0 0 0 0 2 Ogemaw 1 0 0 0 0 1 Ontonagon 0 0 0 0 0 0 Osceola 1 0 0 1 0 2 Oscoda 0 0 0 0 0 0 Otsego 2 0 0 0 0 2 Ottawa 6 1 0 0 0 7 Presque Isle 0 0 0 0 0 0 Roscommon 2 0 0 0 0 2 Saginaw 34 6 1 3 1 45 St. Clair 24 1 1 1 0 27 St. Joseph 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sanilac 2 0 0 0 0 2 Schoolcraft 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shiawassee 8 0 1 1 0 10 Tuscola 1 0 0 0 0 1 Van Buren 4 1 0 1 0 6 Washtenaw 41 1 3 4 1 50 Wayne 164 15 12 24 6 221 Wexford 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 727 57 43 81 21 929

Appendix F -2004 PROGRAM OUTCOMES BY COUNTY – FEMALE PROBATIONER


Appendix F - 2004 PROGRAM OUTCOMES BY COUNTY – FEMALE PROBATIONER – Cont.


Appendix G -2004 PROGRAM OUTCOMES BY COUNTY – MALE PRISONER

Successful Rule Voluntary Medical Unqualified Totals Completion Violator Withdrawal Termination Alcona 0 0 1 0 0 1

Alger 2 0 0 0 0 2

Allegan 7 1 2 0 0 10

Alpena 4 0 0 0 0 4

Antrim 2 0 1 0 0 3

Arenac 0 0 0 0 0 0

Baraga 1 0 0 0 0 1

Barry 4 0 1 0 0 5

Bay 14 0 0 0 0 14

Benzie 1 0 0 0 0 1

Berrien 32 0 0 1 1 34

Branch 1 0 0 0 0 1

Calhoun 19 1 0 1 0 21

Cass 0 0 0 0 0 0

Charleviox 2 0 0 0 0 2

Cheboygan 0 0 1 1 0 2

Chippewa 1 0 0 0 0 1

Clare 1 0 0 0 0 1

Clinton 4 0 1 0 0 5

Crawford 2 0 0 0 0 2

Delta 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dickinson 3 0 0 0 0 3

Eaton 4 2 0 1 0 7

Emmet 1 0 0 0 0 1

Genesee 36 1 5 5 1 48

Gladwin 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gogebic 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grand Traverse 16 0 0 0 1 17

Gratiot 7 0 0 0 0 7

Hillsdale 19 0 1 1 0 21

Houghton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Huron 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ingham 10 0 2 2 0 14

Ionia 5 0 0 0 0 5

Iosco 0 0 0 0 0 0

Iron 1 0 0 0 0 1

Isabella 3 0 2 0 0 5

Jackson 21 1 2 3 1 28

Kalamazoo 11 0 0 0 3 14

Kalkaska 3 0 0 0 0 3

Kent 38 0 6 6 0 50

Keweenaw 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lake 0 0 1 0 0 1

Lapeer 1 0 0 0 0 1

Appendix G - 2004 PROGRAM OUTCOMES BY COUNTY – MALE PRISONER – Cont.


Appendix G -2004 PROGRAM OUTCOMES BY COUNTY – FEMALE PRISONER


Appendix G - 2004 PROGRAM OUTCOMES BY COUNTY – FEMALE PRISONER – Cont.


Appendix H -2004 MONTHLY PROGRAM OUTCOMES – PRISONER

MALE Successful Rule Voluntary Medical Unqualified Totals Completion Violator Withdrawal Termination JANUARY 48 2 4 3 0 57 FEBRUARY 28 0 7 2 1 38 MARCH 21 4 11 4 2 42 APRIL 37 1 1 3 1 43 MAY 48 2 4 2 1 57 JUNE 57 0 4 5 0 66 JULY 41 1 1 4 2 49 AUGUST 60 0 3 1 0 64 SEPTEMBER 41 3 0 5 0 49 OCTOBER 22 0 4 2 2 30 NOVEMBER 69 2 3 5 1 80 DECEMBER 31 1 6 2 3 43 TOTAL 503 16 48 38 13 618

FEMALE Successful Rule Voluntary Medical Unqualified Totals Completion Violator Withdrawal Termination JANUARY 7 0 0 1 0 8 FEBRUARY 2 0 1 1 0 4 MARCH 4 0 0 0 0 4 APRIL 14 0 0 0 0 14 MAY 9 0 0 1 0 10 JUNE 8 0 0 0 0 8 JULY 8 0 0 1 0 9 AUGUST 8 0 0 0 0 8 SEPTEMBER 2 0 0 1 0 03 OCTOBER 2 0 0 1 1 4 NOVEMBER 7 0 0 1 0 8 DECEMBER 4 1 0 1 0 6 TOTAL 75 1 1 8 1 86

Appendix I -2004 MONTHLY PROGRAM OUTCOMES – PROBATIONER

MALE Successful Rule Voluntary Medical Unqualified Totals Completion Violator Withdrawal Termination JANUARY 74 4 3 2 1 84 FEBRUARY 61 8 4 3 1 77 MARCH 38 9 9 6 1 63 APRIL 80 7 3 7 4 101 MAY 60 2 4 5 2 73 JUNE 75 5 3 9 1 93 JULY 71 2 2 4 1 80 AUGUST 70 4 4 7 4 89 SEPTEMBER 46 6 3 17 3 75 OCTOBER 60 5 4 6 0 75 NOVEMBER 53 3 2 10 3 71 DECEMBER 39 2 2 5 0 48 TOTAL 727 57 43 81 21 929

FEMALE Successful Rule Voluntary Medical Unqualified Totals Completion Violator Withdrawal Termination JANUARY 2 0 0 0 0 2 FEBRUARY 3 1 0 0 0 4 MARCH 3 0 0 0 0 3 APRIL 3 0 0 0 0 3 MAY 3 0 0 0 0 2 JUNE 2 0 0 0 0 1 JULY 3 0 0 1 0 4 AUGUST 2 0 0 0 0 2 SEPTEMBER 3 0 0 1 0 4 OCTOBER 0 0 0 0 1 1 NOVEMBER 3 0 0 0 0 3 DECEMBER 1 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL 28 1 0 2 1 32

2004 GRADUATES BY SEX

503

727

26

75

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Prisoner Males

Probationer Males

Prisoner Females

Probationer females

Prisoner Males Probationer Males Prisoner Females Probationer Females

Appendix J

COMPARATIVE PROGRAM OUTCOMES – MALES 2004 AND 2003

Prisoners Probationers 2004 2003 2004 2003 Terminations Successful Completions 503 (88.7%) 504 (87.0%) 727 (87.9%) 832 (86.9%) Voluntary Withdrawals 48 ( 8.5%) 51 ( 8.8%) 43 ( 5.2%) 75 ( 7.8%) Rule Violators 16 ( 2.8%) 24 ( 4.2%) 57 ( 6.9%) 50 ( 5.2%) Total 567 579 827 957 Unqualified Medical Terminations 38 30 81 55 Unqualified by statute 13 8 21 12 Total Program Exits 618 617 929 1024

Appendix K

COMPARATIVE PROGRAM OUTCOMES – FEMALES 2004 AND 2003 Prisoners Probationers 2004 2003 2004 2003 Terminations Successful Completions 75 (97.4%) 29 (82.8%) 28 (96.6%) 26 (86.7%) Voluntary Withdrawals 1 ( 1.3%) 5 (14.3%) 0 ( 0.0%) 2 ( 6.7%) Rule Violators 1 ( 1.3%) 1 ( 2.9%) 1 ( 3.4%) 2 ( 6.7%) Total 77 35 29 30 Unqualified Medical Terminations 8 12 2 8 Unqualified by statute 1 2 1 0 Total Program Exits 86 49 32 38

Appendix K

CURRENT STATUS OF FEMALE PRISONER PROGRAM GRADUATES

(As of 1/29 /2005)

The current status of the 178 female prisoners who successfully completed the program between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2004, is as follows: FEMALES 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Successful Completions 29 15 30 29 75 Completed Parole 18 (62.1%) 12 (80.0%) 19 (63.3%) 7 (24.1%) 1 ( 1.3%) Currently on Parole * 4 (13.8%) 1 ( 6.7%) 4 (13.3%) 18 (62.1%) 66 (88.0%) Returned to Prison 3 (10.3%) 0 ( 0.0%) 0 ( 0.0%) 2 ( 6.9%) 6 ( 8.0%) as Parole Violators Re-paroled After Being 3 (10.3%) 1 ( 6.7%) 6 (20.0%) 1 ( 3.5%) 2 ( 2.7%) Returned as Parole Violators Returned to Prison With New Felony Convictions A. As Parole Violators 1 ( 3.5%) 0 ( 0.0%) 1 ( 3.3%) 1 ( 3.5%) 0 ( 0.0%) With New Convictions B. With Convictions 0 ( 0.0%) 1 ( 6.7%) 0 ( 0.0%) 0 ( 0.0%) 0 ( 0.0%) After Completing Parole * Includes parolees on absconder status.

Appendix L

CURRENT STATUS OF MALE PRISONER PROGRAM GRADUATES

(As of 1/29 /2005)

The current status of the 2309 male prisoners who successfully completed the program between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2004, is as follows: MALES 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Successful Completions 408 397 497 504 503 Completed Parole 232 (56.9%) 225 (56.7%) 260 (52.3%) 262 (52.0%) 2 ( 0.4%) Currently on Parole * 11 ( 2.7%) 36 ( 9.1%) 74 (14.8%) 112 (22.2%) 455 (90.5%) Returned to Prison 22 ( 5.4%) 23 ( 5.8%) 39 ( 7.8%) 21 ( 4.2%) 29 ( 5.8%) as Parole Violators Re-paroled After Being 29 ( 7.1%) 37 ( 9.3%) 35 ( 7.0%) 56 ( 11.1%) 4 ( 0.8%) Returned as Parole Violators Returned to Prison With New Felony Convictions A. As Parole Violators 88 (21.6%) 64 (16.1%) 87 (17.5%) 52 (10.3%) 13 ( 2.6%) With New Convictions B. With Convictions 26 ( 6.4%) 12 ( 3.0%) 2 ( 0.4%) 1 ( 0.2%) 0 ( 0.0%) After Completing Parole * Includes parolees on absconder status.

Appendix L

COMPARATIVE STATUS OF PROBATIONER GRADUATES 2004 AND 2003

MALES 2004 2003 FEMALES 2004 2003 On probation or have On probation or have completed probation 649 (89.3%) 612 (73.6%) completed probation 24 (85.7%) 22 (84.6%) Re-Sentenced to prison Re-Sentenced to prison as probation violators 64 ( 8.8%) 154 (18.5%) as probation violators 4 (14.3%) 4 (15.4%) Re-sentenced to prison for Re-sentenced to prison for crimes committed after crimes committed after completing SAI 14 ( 2.0%) 66 ( 7.9%) completing SAI 0 ( 0.0%) 0 ( 0.0%) Total 727 832 Total 28 26

Appendix M

S MICHIGAN JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PATRICIA … · 2016. 2. 26. · JENNIFER...

Documents

Transcript of S MICHIGAN JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PATRICIA … · 2016. 2. 26. · JENNIFER...