Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

25
Explaining causal modelling OR What a causal model ought to explain Federica Russo Université catholique de Louvain

Transcript of Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

Page 1: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

Explaining causal modellingOR

What a causal model ought to explain

Federica RussoUniversité catholique de

Louvain

Page 2: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

2

Overview What is a causal model

Explanatory vocabulary in causal modelling

Modelling causal mechanisms

Causal-model explanations

Causal modelling vs. other models

Page 3: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

What is a causal model

Page 4: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

4

54

4

13

34

12

2

X1Economic

development

X2Social

development

X3Sanitary

infrastructures

X4Use of

sanitary infrastructure

sX5

Age structure

YMortality

45543344

31133

21122

14422

XXXXXXX

XXY

Page 5: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

5

Causal models

Rest on a number of assumptions

Model causal relations statisticallystatistically

Uncover stable variational relations

Page 6: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

Explanatory vocabulary in causal modelling

Page 7: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

7

Explanation in structural equations

Y=X+X, Y : explanatory and response variables

Xs explain Y

Intuitively:Xs explain Y

Xs account for Y

Xs are relevant causal factors in the causal mechanism

Page 8: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

8

CM explains variability in YY=X+

Variations in X explain variations in Y

How is explanation ‘quantified’?

r2 represents the fraction of variability in Y explained by X

r2 indicates how much variability in Y is accounted for by the regression function

Page 9: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

9

But … r2 measures the goodness of fit,

not the validity of the model

r2 doesn’t give any theoretical reason for the accounted variability

r2 depends on the correctness of assumptions

Page 10: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

10

The philosophical answer

Explanatory import is given by:

Covariate sufficiency

No-confounding

Background knowledge

Page 11: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

Modelling causal mechanisms

Page 12: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

12

Causal models model mechanisms

Most widespread conception:Mechanisms are made of physical processes, interactions, …, assembled to behave like a gear

But:What if we have

socio-economic-demographic variables?social and biological variables?

Page 13: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

13

A mixed mechanism

TreatmentPrevention

Socioeconomicdeterminants

Maternalfactors

Environmental contamination

Nutrientdeficiency

Injury

Healthy Sick

Personal illness control

Growthfaltering

Mortality

Page 14: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

14

The causal model incorporates social and biological variables

Modelling the mechanism gives the causal model explanatory power

Page 15: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

Causal-models explanations

Page 16: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

16

Causal modelling is a model of explanation

The formal structure of explanation is given

by the methodology of causal modelling:

Formulate the causal hypothesis

Build the statistical model

Draw consequences to conclude to empirical validity/invalidity of the hypothesis

Page 17: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

17

CM explanations are flexible:

they allow a va et viens between established theories and establishing theories

they participate in establishing new theories

negative results may trigger further research

Page 18: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

18

CM explanations allow control:

1) statisticalr2 measures amount of variability explained

2) epistemicCM requires coherence of resultswith background knowledge

3) metaphysicalCM requires ontological homogeneitybetween variables in the mechanism

Page 19: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

Causal modellingvs

other models of explanation

Page 20: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

20

CM vs deductive-nomological model well known problems with laws not all explanations involve deduction

CM vs statistical-relevance model S-R is too narrow in scope

CM vs causal-mechanical model it cannot account for mixed mechanisms

Page 21: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

21

CM vs manipulationist modelWoodward (2003)

A theory of causal explanation

Causal generalisations are change-relating

Change-relating relations are explanatory:they are invariant under a large class of interventions or environmental changes

Page 22: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

22

Generalisations show:(i) that the explanandum was to be expected(ii) how the explanandum would change

if initial conditions had changed

What-if-things-had-been-different questions

Relevant counterfactuals describe outcomes of interventions

Explanatory power is tested by means of counterfactual questions

Page 23: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

23

However …The manipulationist account:

Overlooks the role of background knowledge

Neglects the causal role of non-manipulable factors

Takes for granted what the causes are

Page 24: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

24

To sum upCausal modelling

Aims at explaining social phenomena

Makes essential use of explanatory vocabulary

Has explanatory power insofar as it models mechanism

Page 25: Russo Silf07 Explaining Causal Modelling

25

To concludeCausal modelling is a model of explanation

Among its virtues, over and above alternative models:

FlexibilityControl