RPT ON IP & RES SUR€¦ · KOTES ON THE THEORY, METHOD OF FIELD OPERATION, AND PRESENTATION OF...
Transcript of RPT ON IP & RES SUR€¦ · KOTES ON THE THEORY, METHOD OF FIELD OPERATION, AND PRESENTATION OF...
42C13SW8029 S.6813 WABIKOBA LAKE 010
42C13SW8829 2.6813 WABIKOBA LAKE 010C
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part: A: Notes on theory and field procedure
Part: B: Report
1. Introduction
2. Presentation of Results
3. Discussion of Results
4. Conclusions and Recommendations
5. Assessment Details
6. Statement of Cost
7. Certificate
8. Appendix - Small Sources
Part C; Illustrations
Plan Map (in pocket)
IP Data Plots
8 pages
8 pages Page
l
3
4
5
6
7
8
8 pieces
Dwg. No. I.P.P. 4128
Dwg. Nos.IP 5375-1 to -7
:, ; ^,; . IjV.LK'^'"*"i.Ui""'''
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LIMITED
KOTES ON THE THEORY, METHOD OF FIELD OPERATION,
AND PRESENTATION OF DATA
FOR THE INDUCED POLARIZATION METHOD
Induced Polarization as a geophysical measurement refers
to the blocking action or polarization of metallic or electronic
conductors in a medium of ionic solution conduction.
This electro-chemical phenomenon occurs wherever
electrical current is passed through an area which contains metallic
minerals such as base metal sulphides. Normally, when current is
passed through the ground, as in resistivity measurements, all of the
conduction takes place through ions present in the water content of the
rock, or soil, i.e. by ionic conduction. This is because almost all
minerals have a much higher specific resistivity than ground water,
The group of minerals commonly described as "metallic", however,
have specific resistivities much lower than ground waters. The
induced polarization effect takes place at those interfaces where the
mode of conduction changes from ionic in the solutions filling the
interstices of the rock to electronic in the metallic minerals present
- 2 -
in the rock.
The blocking action or induced polarization mentioned
above, which depends upon the chemical energies necessary to allow
the ions to give up or receive electrons from the metallic surface,
increases with the time that a d.c. current is allowed to flow through
the rock; i.e. as ions pile up against the metallic interface the
resistance to current flow increases. Eventually, there is enough
polarization in the form of excess ions at the interfaces, to appreciably
reduce the amount of current flow through the metallic particle. This
polarization takes place at each of the infinite number of solution-metal
interfaces in a mineralized rock.
When the d.c. voltage used to create this d.c. current
flow is cut off, the Coulomb forces between the charged ions forming
the polarization cause them to return to their normal position. This
movement of charge creates a small current flow which can be
measured on the surface of the ground as a decaying potential difference.
From an alternate viewpoint it can be seen that if the
direction of the current through the system is reversed repeatedly
before the polarization occurs, the effective resistivity of the system
as a whole will change as the frequency of the switching is changed.
This is a consequence of the fact that the amount of current flowing
through each metallic interface depends upon the length of time that
current has been passing through it in one direction.
- 3 -
The values of the per cent frequency effect or F.E. are
a measurement of the polarization in the rock mass. However, since
the measurement of the degree of polarization is related to the apparent
resistivity of the rock mass it is found that the metal factor values or
M.F. are the most useful values in determining the amount of
polarization present in the rock mass. The MF values are obtained by
normalizing the F.E. values for varying resistivities.
The induced polarization measurement is perhaps the most
powerful geophysical method for the direct detection of metallic
sulphide mineralization, even when this mineralization is of very
low concentration. The lower limit of volume per cent sulphide
necessary to produce a recognizable IP anomaly will vary with the
geometry and geologic environment of the source, and the method of
executing the survey. However, sulphide mineralization of less than
one per cent by volume has been detected by the IP method under
proper geological conditions.
The greatest application of the IP method has been in the
search for disseminated metallic sulphides of less than 207, by volume.
However, it has also been used successfully in the search for massive
sulphides in situations where, due to source geometry, depth of source,
or low resistivity of surface layer, the EM method cannot be successfully
applied. The ability to differentiate ionic conductors, such as water
filled shear zones, makes the IP method a useful tool in checking EM
- A -
anomalies which are suspected of being due to these causes.
In normal field applications the IP method does not
differentiate between the economically important metallic minerals
such as chalcopyrite, chalcocite, molybdenite, galena, etc., and the
other metallic minerals such as pyrite. The induced polarization effect
is due to the total of all electronic conducting minerals in the rock mass.
Other electronic conducting materials which can produce an IP response
are magnetite, pyrolusite, graphite, and some forms of hematite.
In the field procedure, measurements on the surface are
made in a way that allows the effects of lateral changes in the properties
of the ground to be separated from the effects of vertical changes in the
properties. Current is applied to the ground at two points in distance
(X) apart. The potentials are measured at two points (X) feet
apart, in line with the current electrodes is an integer number (n) times
the basic distance (X).
The measurements are made along a surveyed line, with
a constant distance (nX) between the nearest current and potential
electrodes. In most surveys, several traverses are made with various
values of (n); i.e. (n) - 1,2,3,4, etc. The kind of survey required
(detailed or reconnaissance) decides the number of values of (n) used.
In plotting the results, the values of apparent resistivity,
apparent per cent frequency effect, and the apparent metal factor
- 5 -
measured for each set of electrode positions are plotted at the
intersection of grid lines, one from the center point of the current
electrodes and the other from the center point of the potential electrodes.
(See Figure A). The resistivity values are plotted at the top of the data
profile, above the percent frequency effect. On a third line, below the
percent frequency effect, are plotted the values of the metal factor values.
The lateral displacement of a given value is determined by the location
along the survey line of the center point between the current and potential
electrodes. The distance of the value from the line is determined by the
distance (nX) between the current and potential electrodes when the
measurement was made.
The separation between sender and receiver electrodes is
only one factor which determines the depth to which the ground is being
sampled in any particular measurement. The plots then, when contoured,
are not section maps of the electrical properties of the ground under
the survey line. The interpretation of the results from any given survey
must be carried out using the combined experience gained from field
results, model study results and the theoretical investigations. The
position of the electrodes when anomalous values are measured is
important in the interpretation.
In the field procedure, the interval over which the potential
differences are measured is the same as the interval over which the
electrodes are moved after a series of potential readings has been made.
- 6 -
One of the advantages of the induced polarization method is that the
same equipment can be used for both detailed and reconnaissance surveys
merely by changing the distance (X) over which the electrodes are moved
each time. In the past, intervals have been used ranging from 25 feet
to 2000 feet for (X). In each case, the decision as to the distance (X)
and the values of (n) to be used is largely determined by the expected
size of the mineral deposit being sought, the size of the expected anomaly
and the speed with which it is desired to progress.
The diagram in Figure A demonstrates the method used
in plotting the results. Each value of the apparent resistivity, apparent
percent frequency effect, and apparent metal factor effect is plotted and
identified by the position of the four electrodes when the measurement
was made. It can be seen that the values measured for the larger values
of (n) are plotted farther from the line indicating that the thickness of
the layer of the earth that is being tested is greater than for the smaller
values of (n); i.e. the depth of the measurement is increased.
The IP measurement is basically obtained by measuring the
difference in potential or voltage (AV)obtained at two operating
frequencies. The voltage is the product of the current through the ground
and the apparent resistivity of the ground. Therefore in field situations
where the current is very low due to poor electrode contact, or the
apparent resistivity is very low, or a combination of the two effects; the
value, of ( AV ) the change in potential will be too small to be measurable.
The symbol "TL" on the data plots indicates this situation.
- 7 -
In some situations spurious noise, either man made or natural,
will render it impossible to obtain a reading. The symbol "N" on the
data plots indicates a station at which it is too noisy to record a reading.
If a reading can be obtained, but for reasons of noise there is some doubt
as to its accuracy, the reading is bracketed in the data plot ( ).
In certain situations negative values of Apparent Frequency
Effect are recorded. This may be due to the geologic environment or
spurious electrical effects. The actual negative frequency effect value
recorded is indicated on the data plot, however, the symbol "NEC" is
indicated for the corresponding value of Apparent Metal Factor. In
contouring negative values the contour lines are indicated to the nearest
positive value in the immediate vicinity of the negative value.
The symbol "NR" indicates that for some reason the operator
did not attempt to record a reading although normal survey procedures
would suggest that one was required. This may be due to inaccessible
topography or other similar reasons. Any symbol other than those
discussed above is unique to a particular situation and is described within
the body of the report.
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LIMITED.
METHOD USED IN PLOTTING DIPOLE-DIPOLE
INDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY RESULTS
Slottont on line
n -
n - 2 -
n - 3 -
n - A ~
x * Electrode spreod length n * E lectrode separation
P P P f f P1,2-3.4 2,1-4,* 5.4-5,6 4,5-6? 5,6-7,6 6,7-6,9
___ P P P P P1,2-4,5 2,3-5,6 3.4-6,7 4,5-7,8 5,6-B,9
________ P P P P 1,2-5,6 2,3-6,7 3.4*7,8 4,5-8,9
__________ P P P1,2-6,7 2,3-7,8 3,4-6,9
Apparent Resistivity
n - l
n - 2
n - 3n - A -
F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E 1,2-3,4 2,3-4,5 3,4-5,6 4,5-6,7 5.6-7JB 6,7-8,9
___ F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E1,2-4,5 2.3-5,6 3,4-6,7 4,5-7,8 5,6-8,9
______ F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. * . -1,2-5,6 2,3-6.7 3,4-7,8 4,5-8,9 Apparent Percent
_______ F.E. F.E. F.E. Frequency Effect1,2-6,7 2,3-7,8 3,4-8,9
n - l -
n - 2 -
n - 3 -
n - A ~
M.F. M.F. M.F. M.F. M.F. M.F. 1,2-3,4 2,3-4,5 3,4-5,6 4,5-6? 5,6-7,8 6,7-8,9
___ M.F. M.F. M.F. M.F. M.F.1,2-4,5 2,3-5,6 3,4-6,7 4,5-7,8 5,6-8,9
_______ M.F. M.F. M.F. M.F. 1,2-5,6 2,3-6,7 3,4-7,8 4,5-8,9
_________ M.F. M.F. M.F. 1,2-6,7 2i3-7,8 3,4-8,9
Apparent Metal Factor
Fig. A
REPORT ON THE
RECONNAISSANCE INDUCED POLARIZATION
AND RESISTIVITY SURVEY
ON
A PORTION OF A CLAIM GROUP
WABIKOBA LAKE AREA
DISTRICT OF THUNDER BAY, ONTARIO
FOR
HEMLO EXPLORATIONS LIMITED
1. INTRODUCTION
At the request of Orequest Consultants, we have completed a
reconnaissance induced polarization and resistivity survey on a grid
covering a portion of a claim group in the Wabikoba Lake area of
Ontario. The area of interest is located within the Thunder Bay Mining
District, and is controlled by Hemlo Explorations Limited.
The area is of interest because of several gold discoveries to the
southwest. In the Hemlo Area, the gold is contained within disseminated
sulphide mineralization. The weakly disseminated, metallic sulphide
zones occur within any of several types of metamorphic rocks (schists,
quartzites, volcanics, etc.). The background IP effects in the general
Hemlo Area are low in magnitude; this must be due to the low level of
metallic minerals (pyrite, magnetite, etc.) in the country rocks.
*- 9
The IP anomalies from the gold-bearing sulphide zones vary from low
In magnitude to quite strong. The sulphide concentrations within the
ore zones varies considerably; however, the anomalies detected are often
quite definite due to the low background. The interpretation is also
often aided by the fact that the overburden is relatively thin in many
areas. This means that any bedrock sources of IP effect will be
"shallow" in the reconnaissance survey; i.e., they will be anomalous for
the n ~ l measurement.
The IP results shown in Figure l to Figure 6 were measured over a
typical gold-bearing sulphide zone in the Hemlo Area. It can be seen
that the IP anomalies measured are low to moderate in magnitude. There
may or may not be a region of lower apparent resistivities associated
with the IP anomaly. However, there is almost certainly not enough
mineralization present to cause these low resistivities; the low
resistivities where they are present, are perhaps due to porosity
changes in the host rocks, caused by shearing, fracturing, alteration,
etc.
The IP data we have enclosed from the Hemlo Area was measured using
X z 50 meters, Y. = 25 meters and X ~ 1 5 meters. With these short
electrode intervals, the n ~ l measurement is anomalous; i.e. the source
is shallow. However, in a reconnaissance survey the electrode interval
used is sometimes greater. It must be kept firmly in mind (see Appendix
to this report) that if a large electrode interval is used to detect a
narrow source, the magnitude of the apparent IP anomaly will be reduced.
In order to better locate, and evaluate, the source of a narrow, shallow
anomaly detailed measurements with shorter electrode intervals must be
completed. (See Appendix).
LIME - 118E X-2511 PHO (.OHM-H 1
eecs 000 il ? 16 l fr l JO l M
4 M? 5...liTT ERPRETRTIOH
.460. g... ...3? e. s..-4———————*-
N. iN*2
M*3
N -4
M-5
H* 6
s/ 101V \7104 " / \ ;,10K/ 7934) 6520
.X 1371 I467';S\VK16"74187341
^2714 2058 s 4592^ 5929 /'8474
M-l
H'2
N'3
N"4
N-5
DUG HO.-I P- FIG. l
H. W. ONTflRIO GOLD EXPLORRTIOHGOLD H1TH DISSEMJNRTEO SULPHIDES
III HRRP.OU ZONES
LINE NO .-118E
LINE - 1 1 8 E
blFOLE NUMBER 1COORD1MRTE 600 1
x-zsN rnnsE ^l,OH^>i 1 3 141*. If i
55PS 500 J 4507 18 19110111
S- 400S 350?1 1 't
INTERPRETftTIOII ,
N * 1 19 \x9j--X
M, 3 17 yH' 4 13
N. 5
H -e
^^J^^7' rc V'X X-F\^/^ 21 /^55 ^ \ 4o14x^^21 /' *f N 55 JttV
X'' x 3i 42 4* 4ft 45
^4^-1^4^'•\N If "\ 13 \15
3? X\\ 19 \ 13
37^ N 17 x 14
N-l -
N*2 -
M* 3 -
N-4 -
N-5 -
H. f.-
*— X —i -(IX- —V— x —^
r-( r-\
PLOTTING POINT —— X-25M
SURFRCE PROJECTION OF FtNOMRLOUS ZONE
DEFINITE PROPflBLE POSSIBLE
T ) NRRROU7 S RESISTIUI TVV ) LOMS
ZONE A
DIPOLELINE - I16E K-25H HETRL FflCTOP.
NUHBEF- 1 i \ 3 1 4 S \ t 7 16 9 16" Til TIT-.COORQINRTE CC'Of 5501 50PS 4505. 400S. 350S
1HTEPFH*l
11-2
N-3
M* 4
•N"5
N" 6
RE T RT ION , , , ^HHMMHIHI, ( | r ( (.4 .1 .07 .08 . 3*1 \s6.9 \\ 3///1 .2 .0^ .2 N*l -
/VI \ ^ \\ ( li \ •J .1 .06 .gy^'^.3 Q, 9.7y)[{. 1.1) .J .2 J N-2 -
X^' i ^ ——— ' I'^v ( .1 .05 .2 //f 2.6) 4 3.4;,\A.e .3 .2 N^3-/7 \ i /•--zr^ ^^
.1 .1 "16 \ ' 3.9 ' 'l.?^- 2.2 VNx .5 .2 .5 N-4 -
N-5 -
n*e .
FREPUEHCV ?HERT2) l .C H2 .
NOTE- CONTOURS RT LOGflRITHMIC INTERUfiLS. l ,-l .5 -i , - 3,-5.-7 5.-IB
DRTE SURVEYED'1963 RPPROVED
DflTE.
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTD
INDUCED POLRRtZRTION
RNO RESISTIVITY SURVEY
L INf
'M F Vi E NllhBEf.COORDINATE .INTEPFREIFtTU
M- l PI'
H* i
11*4
N '5
M* 6
- 1 1 8 E X ' 1 S M
1 i 1 3 1 4 1 5 1Ec'OS 4985 4SOS .li ^Tf r,?l4 s 3l?1..^ftlf. ryj5l7jpvf.393 f
rC33 51?9^V433 \254 (,V\^14O\5934
~~~\ w * Y — ~-'* - ̂ V ^ \ S-
^"aKoVsW^'e? C 73^792
'o^^Tw^- 7?A^nT
P H C ( 0 H M - M .'
617144305
253/ \IPK H * 1 -
/' 9719 H*2 -
N'4 -
N-5 -
H, 6-
DUG. NO. -t P r FIG. 2
H. W. ONTRRIO GOLD EXPLORRTIOHSOLO WITH DISSEMINATED S ULPHIDES
IN NRRROM ZONES
LINE HO .-l 18E DETAIL
D I P Q L E
L I HE
NiJMBEFCOORDINRTE
..INTEP.r-FH"l
H'l
11*7
N-4
N-5
H- 6
CI.Fll 10
P.?
- 1 18E
1 i 1 .3.Si-OS 4301
1
-J;K'\51 7 ?7.2^'/ 44 } 63
3? ^ 56 5C-: \
4F: s v 54^
47 \ fi
y,* I SM
14 1 E 14 COS
v \ *y \66 -5C/ f, 24
64 ( 38 \
5? 5f ^ 35, ____ ,
- 4P ~- 53
p H R s E '.i OH:,'
f 1 i1 164 3 OS
V 13 \\6.1 N* l -
\\13 H. g-
2? 11 = 3-
0 = 4 -
H " 5 -
11 = 6-
<— X —X- -NX- -x— x — y
ffiPLOTTINGPOINT — X-15M
SUPFRCE PROJECTION OF flNOMflLOUS ZONE
DEFINITE mmmmmmm T ) NRRROUPPOFjflPLE i iiiiiiiit V ) R ESI ST l VI TYPOSSIBLE ***** V) LOWS
ZONE ALIME - 118E
'b'lF&LE NUHBEf- 1 i 1 SCOORDINRTE E i 0 c 4 90S
X'l 5M
1 4 1 t 14 6 0 S
METRL FRCTOR
4 1 fr le4 3 0 S
INTEFPPElflf I OH , ••"Wn** II II II
H-l .1 .E \M*jfY21•i *2 .1 -ey^ '" }\"• 3 - 11 ^"^je.H '4 I.ft VV'v 1, 8.4
11*5 4.7"^ 5.4
H. 6
/^\V^s626 ^^2,3 y\ .4
ilJl^/is' 1/9 f ,-^7 ] \\' f~ —— --^ 4.r
6.6 ''-* .4
•i' .0? N . 1 -
.1 N-2-
.3 .1 = 3-
11*4'
N"5 -
11 = 6 -
FREPUEHCY (HERTZ) l O HZ
NOTE- CONTOURS RT LOCRRITHMIC 1NTERVRLS. 1.-15 -2,-3,-5,-7.S.-10
DRTE SURVEYED '1993 RPPROVED
DOTE.
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTDINDUCED POLflRIZflTION
RND RESISTIVITY SURVEY
LIHE - 120H X-50M RHO (OHH-M)
PJPOLE NUMBERCOORDINRTE 250S
N-l 3757 l s\ 12
H- 2 5184\
H" 3 20?
H. 4
H- 3
H* 6
121314151*1716150s sos sen
^r i i( \8140 XV4370/V *2K 331, H" 1 -
O^V 14K 12K^s^500 N " 3 -
6650^ -^ST" IBK N-4-
N-5 -
N.6-
DUG HO . - I . P - FIG. 3
H.W. OHTRRIO GOLD EXPLORRTIONGOLD HITH DISSEMINATED SULPHIDES
IN NfiRROW ZONES
LIKE NO .-120W
L I HE - 126W X-50M
DJPOLf NUMBER 12 1 7 14 I t. ...J-iOORDlRRTE 250 i 1 1.8 S 50S
1NTERPRETRTIOH , , , , ,N ' 1 24 v^xg.?// \20 2f. \ 18 \ \6.S
N*2 20 ^-^^l^ 24 27 \ 16
N ' 3 34 \^ 25 27 27
H- 4 38 \ 25 28N-5
N-6
PHHSE C 1 OHT )
e 1.7 ..i.....e...sen
N-2 -
N o 3 -
HM-
H- 5 -
H* f. -
PLOTTING POINT X-5BM
SURFfiCE PROJECTION OF RHOMflLOUS ZONE
DEFINITE PROEfiPLE POSSIBLE
T ) NRRROW7 ) R ESISTIVITYV) LOWS
ZONE B
LIHE - 120W X-50M
_D IP OLE NUMBER 1 Z I 3 I 4 I E^OORPINRTE E50t 150S 50S
7'V'W'*. , piling fH - 1 .6 .09 .2 .6 .04 .03
N*2 .4 .1 .Z- .4 .03
H- 3 1^) -2 .2 .3
N*4 .f .2 .2
H- 5
H -6
METRL FRCTOF1
617 i 6SOU
H" 1 -
H- 2 -
H- 4 -
N-5 -
FREQUENCY (HERTZ) 1.0 HZ.
NOTE- CONTOURS flT LOGflRlTHMIC INTEPVflLS l.-l J -2.-?.-5.-7 .S,-l O
DflTE SURVEYED'1983 RPPROVED
DflTE.
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTDINDUCED POLRRI2RTION
fi N D RESISTIVITY SURVEY
LINE - 128W
DIPOLE NjMBER 12 13 1 4
X-25M RHC' COHM-M)
15161*1619 10 1 11 l i...50S 100S 50S B
———— \JL- ——————— , ——— , ——— , ——— *-^-H ——————— i ——— , ——————— i ——— i ———11*1 8216 8687 8021 B2f5 \v3323/^' 1435^^5* 1™ "^f^S^L-J*^ M*''
M* 2 3612\S^10K^ 9764-^'l8K N\~UX x^ ̂ 304,-^ O20B^i 38K 43K "Xc-.lSKX'" 261. 14 = 2-
N-3 299^ 4331N^s950GX/' 19K leK^^^Tj^SOs) /6935^v31K ^54K \^I4K /^SSK N*3-
N*4 3596 3826^'' 17K 19K •''7435 6363^ 44?jN 6650^'-'- 37t: x 57K 541' N*4
N-5 H"5
H * f N ' f
LINE - 12BW
C'TPOLE NUMBtP 1213 4COORPIMRTE ZEDS 280E
X-25M PHRSE t 1 . OHZ f
15 16 17 16 19 110111 liI50S 100S 50i 0
JNTERPpETRTJON , , , . . . . . . . .N-l 14 \v7.3 6.3 (..A// 1 4
N - 3 25 23\ ( 10V.^B.5/ /16 /' 24
H- 4 21-^19 15s 14 ^ ^ 24
N-5
n*e
24 2S 20^ 17 ^^^l^-" 7.5 N-2 -
20 <[3F> k 1? - 1 8 ^ 11 10 N'3
23 23 28 ^ 1? 18 17 N*4
II"?
H -f.
ZONE B
LINE - 120W
MP-OlE ^UMBtP 1 l 1 ? 4
iiiiiiiiinii iTili.., ___ ,
X*25M METflL FRCTOR
1 5 1 f 1 7 1 i 1 9 1 10 1 11 12-150? 1005- SOS 0
H *l ^ .08 .08 .08 .4 //I2.3/// .06 .07 .2 .2 tl*l -
H . N . 0 H T Fi R I 0 GOLDGOLD WITH DISSEM INRTED
I H H ft P R 0 W ZONE
LIME NO . -1201'
t — x — x ——— H y ———
TI rn•^ v, V '
PLOTTING vv ^'POINT ———————— ̂ x
EXPLORRTIOHSULPHIDES
DETAIL
r0!s
X-25M
E.URFRCE PROJECTION OF RNOMRLOUS ZONE
DEFINITE — mi . i T) NflRROU
POSSIBLE **.'*.*i^ V \ L OWS
FREQUENCY (HERTZ) DRTE SURVEYED ' 1 983 IOHJ RPPROVED
NOTE- CONTOURS
INTERVRLS 1 , - l . 5 -2, -3, -5. -7. 5, -10 DRTE
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTD.
INDUCED POLRPIZRTION
RIIP RESIST1 VI TY SURVEY
LINE - 302W X-50M RHO (OHM-M)
PI r o i E 'COORDlHfiTE.
mx ? i * i se? se?
H.lH-'
N-3
N-4
M-I
H-f
9384
DUG HO - I P - FIG. 5
H. W. ONTRRIQ GOLD EXPLORflTIOHGOLD NITH DISSEMIHfUED SULPHIDES
IN HfiRROIJ ZONES
LINE NO.-3D2W
LINE - 3C2W
DIPOLE NUMBER I. i 13 1COORDINPTE 350S 2565INTERPRETATION , , ,
N-l 11 xx 20 -xXi* /' 'V \x
N-2 24 26 X 16 7 12
N-3 2? 27 XS^/X
N-4 31 3?N 23
N-5
N-6
X-50M PHASE (1
4 1 i 1 1? 1 f"
i50s ses^X H// 40 V̂ 13
——J1//' ̂ 38 ^^ 32
'IF 26 24
x 33 ^ 25
OH;;.g
H M -
N-2 -
N"3-
N-5 -
N-6 '
ZONE C
<— x —x- -N X- -X—X—^^
LINE - 302U
DIPOLE NUMBER . ,. . .1.2 1 3COORDINATE 350E 250i
X-50M METfiL FflCTOP
14151(17 t1 5 8 f 5 0 S
INTERPRETATION , . fMKMMBriN-l .1 .3 .3 .2
N-i .1 .6 .3
N-3 .2 .4 .1
N-4 .2 .3
N-5
N-6
.06 .2 .9 .08 H - 1 -
.1 .93 .f. ,5 H * 2 '
.2 .3 .3 N ' 3 -
.2 .4 . e: N '4 -
N ^ f -
jTi ri J,
PLOTT1MC POINT
SUPFFiCE PROJECT10H OF ftMOMflUOUS ZOHE
PEF1HITE PF'OBftBLE POSSIBLE
HfiRROMRESISTIVITY
LOWS
FREQUENCY (HEPTZ) l , 6 HZ
NOTE- CONTOURS RT LOCflRITHMIC INTERVRLS l,-l.5
PflTE SURVEYED-1983 RPPROVED
DfiTE.
P H O E H I X GE O P H Y S I C S LTD
INDUCED POLRRIZflTIOH
ftNP RESISTIVITY SURVEY
LINE - 302H X-25N RHO (OHM-M)
fjf6LE NuhBEft 1 J .: S 4 1 S t' l 7 l e l ...s .CbORDlNRTE 17SS 125S 75S 55S........ ..2.5.)!.....
N-l V I52E/ 4290 3202 v52?S,'T 448? \5?f8,'\ \ Vr 1 3K \s If 1 N*l -
N-2 38 18 /' "730 L/^ 11K I;^4574 3496 4336) *, 923 1) SlsiN^MK N-2-
N-3 2299 S ^7333/y'TeK 15K5jVSe44 2895) 437J \^ 1 1K \,16K N*3-~ \ fl/ f — -N y/ ^V l ^ Vv
N'43848 4572^*' 17k ' 22K^''8595XSX 2227 '3''44 x 53?e xX IIK N-4 -
N-5 N-5-
N - f N - 6
LINE - 302W X-25M PHREE (l.BHt)
DI P OLE NUMBER 12 3 4 15 It 17 IE 1?COORD1NRTE 175S 125E 75S 25S Cf.N1N1EPPF.ETRT10N 11111111
N - 1 4.9/ 6.8 \7.7 *-\//' 4 e \ 24 V lf'r-.'T X '3 N * ' '
N'2 16 '^ ̂ 6.2 /^l-fx/V 9-5^ X30 49 \2? \^13 14 N-2-
N"3 1 ? / H )\VL/' ̂ X^ 28/ 37 47 \ s? \\ 12 N* 3
N-4 20V ^ 12 '9.2^ TT ^22 '36 34 41 ^ El N"4
N-5 N-5
N " 6 N * 6
ZONE CLINE - 302W X-25M METRL FRCTOR
DIPOLE NUMBER 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 S 1 b [ 7 1 6 1 9COORDlMflTE 175E I25S 75E 25S 2SNINTEPPRETRT10H , , 111)111111^1111 , , , ,
"•1 .3 .2 .2 .2 .9 .4 .1 .1 .06 N*l
N-2 .4 .08 .02 .2 .9 X^"l?T} .3 .09 .1 N-2
N-3 .7 .2 .02 .04 -(T!l 1.3 f .9 .2 .68 14 = 3
N-4 .5 .3 .05 .03 .3 \ '"iJT 1̂ 1 s- .7 .2 N-4
N-5 H . 5
N - 6 H - f
H . W . 0 N T fi R I 0 GOLD E X P L 0 R n T I 0 HCOLD WITH 01SSEM1HRTED SULPHIDES
IN M R R R 0 M ZONES
LINE HO.-302H DETAIL
< — x — X ————— N X ————— X — X — ' )
r~i Mi — ) f — ' ̂ s"!Tl Ti v v
X y-V X
x x V ^
PLOTTING "^ x x POINT y x X-25M
SURFRCE PROJECTION OF RNOMRLOUS ZONE
DEFINITE i T) NRRROU
POSSIBLE ****.* V ) L OWS
FREOUENCY (HERTZJ DRTE SURUE YEO ' l 9S3 10 H Z RPPROVED
NOTE- CONTOURSRT LOGRR1THM1C ————————————————————— INTERORLS 1,-1 5 -2.-3.-5.-7 . S.-lfl nflTF
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTD.
INDUCED POLflRI2flTION
RND RESIST I U ITY SURVEY
3
On the Hemlo Explorations Limited Claim Group in the Wabikoba Lake
Area, a previously completed V.L.F. Radio EM survey has outlined several
definite conductors. The reconnaissance induced polarization and
resistivity survey was planned to locate any zones of metallic
mineralization that might correlate with the conductors detected.
2. PRESENTATION OF RESULTS
The reconnaissance induced polarization and resistivity results are
shown on the following enclosed data plots. The results have been
plotted using the pseudo-section format.
Line Electrode Intervals Dwg.No.
24W 150' IP 5375-1
16W 150' IP 5375-2
0+00 150' IP 5375-3
8E 150' ' IP 5375-4
16E 150' IP "5375-5
24E 150' IP 5375-6
32E 150' IP 5375-7
Also enclosed with this report is Dwg. I.P.P.4128, a plan map of
the Wabikoba Lake Grid at a scale of l" = 400'. The definite, probable
and possible Induced Polarization anomalies are indicated by bars, in
the manners shown on the legend, on this plan map as well as on the data
plots. These bars represent the surface projection of the anomalous
zones as interpreted from the location of the transmitter and receiver
electrodes when the anomalous values were measured.
Since the Induced Polarization measurement is essentially an
averaging process, as are all potential methods, it is frequently
difficult to exactly pinpoint the source of an anomaly. Certainly, no
- A -
anomaly can be located with more accuracy than the electrode interval
length; i.e. when using 150" electrode intervals the position of a
narrow sulphide body can only be determined to lie between two stations
150' apart. In order to definitely locate, and fully evaluate, a
narrow, shallow source it is necessary to use shorter electrode
intervals. In order to locate sources at some depth, larger electrode
intervals must be used, with a corresponding increase in the
uncertainties of location. Therefore, while the centre of the indicated
anomaly probably corresponds fairly well with source, the length of the
indicated anomaly along the line should not be taken to represent the
exact edges of the anomalous material.
The topographic information shown on Dwg. I.P.P. 4128 has been
taken from maps made available by the staff of Orequest Consultants Ltd.
3. DTSCUSSION OF RESULTS
The reconnaissance IP and resistivity results show almost no IP
effects associated with the V.L.F. Radio EM conductor previously
detected. However, in all cases there is a definite resistivity low
that correlates with the electromagnetic conductor. Two types of
resistivity lows can be seen on Line 8E. At 2+OOS there is a narrow
resistivity low, with a considerable depth extent; this porous fracture
may be a fault or shear zone in the basement rocks. The anomaly at
about 14+50N to 16+OON lies at the northern edge of a near-surface
resistivity low that is probably due to an increased thickness of
conductive overburden.
There are only a few locations where a very weak, narrow shallow
anomaly has been interpreted from the reconnaissance induced
- 5 -
polarization data. These have been indicated on the data plots and the
plan map.
A. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The sources of the V.L.F. Radio EM conductors previously located
have been confirmed by the resistivity measurements. The zones of
increased conductivity are due to increased porosity. There is no IP
effect associated with the majority of the conductors.
There are a very few, very weak, narrow shallow IP effects
interpreted on the data plots. The most definite are on
Line 0+00, 3+50N and Line 0+00, 38+OON. As outlined in the Appendix to
this report, the sources of these anomalies can be better located, and
evaluated, only by making measurements with shorter electrode intervals.
If the anomalies are confirmed, closely spaced parallel lines should
also be surveyed.
With this detailed data available, a drill test can be planned, if
the source is not known.
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LIMITED,
Philip G. ttadlof, Ph.D., P Geophysicist
Dated: April 23, 1984
- 6 -
ASSESSMENT DETAILS
PROPERTY: Wabikoba Lake Area
SPONSOR: Hemlo Explorations Ltd.
LOCATION: Hemlo Area
TYPE OF SURVEY: Induced Polarization And Resistivity
OPERATING MAN DAYS:
EQUIVALENT 8 HR. MAN DAYS:
CONSULTING MAN DAYS'.
DRAFTING MAN DAYS:
TOTAL MAN DAYS:
MINING DIVISION: Thunder Bay
PROVINCE: Ontario
25.0 DATE STARTED: March l, 1984
37.5 DATE FINISHED: March 18, 1984
3.0 NUMBER OF STATIONS: 184
5.0 NUMBER OF READINGS: 2,190
45.5 MILES OF LINE SURVEYED: 5.03
CONSULTANTS:
Philip G. Hallof, 3505 - 2045 Lakeshore Blvd.W., Toronto, Ontario
FIELD TECHNICIANS:
G. Mullan, P.O. Box 72, R.R.//l, Hudson, P.Q.S. Van Der Vecht, 30 Grovetree Crescent, Rexdale, Ontario
Extra Labourers
S. Jolliffe, 24 Pine Ave. E., Montreal, QuebecC. Constantineau, P.O. Box 201, White River, Ontario
CARTOGRAPHERS:
R.C. Norris, 2499 Linwood Street, Pickering, Ontario M.W. Reh, 58 Crossbow Crescent, Willowdale, Ontario
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LIMITED
Philip G. Geophysicist
, Ph.D., P
Dated: April 23, 1984
- 7 -
STATEMENT OF COST
Orequest Consultants Ltd. - IP Survey Hemlo Area of Ontario
CREW: G. Mullan - S. Van Der Vecht - S. Jolliffe C. Constantineau
PERIOD: March 1-18, 1984
Operating days 3 Bad Weather i Standby l Off
, days
@ $l,125.00/day
@ $
$14,062.50
2,712.50
N.C.
$16,775.00
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LIMITED
Philip G. tUdlof, Ph.D., P Geophysicist
Dated: April 23, 1984
- 8 -
CERTIFICATE
l, Philip G. Hallof, of the City of Toronto, do hereby certify
that:
1. I am a geophysicist residing at Suite 3505, 2045 Lakeshore
Blvd., W. Toronto, Ontario.
2. I am a graduate of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
with a B.Se. Degree (1952) in Geology and Geophysics, and a Ph.D. Degree
(1957) in Geophysics.
3. I am a member of the Society of Exploration Geophysicists and
the European Association of the Exploration Geophysicists.
4. I am a Professional Geophysicist, registered in the Province of
Ontario, The Province of British Columbia and The State of Arizona.
5. I have no direct or indirect interest, nor do I expect to
receive any interest directly or indirectly, in the properties or
securities of Hemlo Explorations Limited, or any affiliate.
6. The statements made in this report are based on a study of
published geological literature and unpublished private reports.
7. Permission is granted to use in whole or in part for assessment
and qualification requirements but not for advertising purposes.
Dated at Toronto
This 23rd day of April, 1984
Philip G. Hallof, Ph.D.
PHOENIX Geophysics Limited
APPENDIX
THE INTERPRETATION OF
INDUCED POLARIZATION ANOMALIES
FROM RELATIVELY SMALL SOURCES
The induced polarization method was originally developed to detect disseminated sulphides and has proven to be very successful in the search for "porphyry copper" deposits. In recent years we have found that the. IP method can also be very useful in exploring for more concentrated deposits of limited size. This type of source gives sharp IP anomalies that are often difficult to interpret.
The anomalous patterns that develop on the contoured data plots will depend on the size, depth and position of the source and the relative size of the electrode interval. The data plots are not sections showing the electrical parameters of the ground. When the electrode interval (X) is appreciably greater than the width of the source, a large volume of unmineralized rock is averaged into each measurement. This is particularly true for the large values of the electrode separation (n).
The theoretical scale model results shown in Figure l and Figure 2 indicate the effect of depth. If the depth to the top of the source is small compared to the electrode interval (i.e. d X) the measure ment for n - l will be anomalous. In Figure l the depth is 0.5 units (X = 1.0 units) and the n = l value is definitely anomalous; the pattern on the contoured data plot is typical for a relatively shallow, narrow, near- vertical tabular source. The results in Figure 2 are for the same source with the depth increased to 1.5 units. Here the n = l value is not anomalous; the larger values of (n) are anomalous but the magnitudes are much lower than for the source at less depth.
When the electrode interval is greater than the width of the source, it is not possible to determine its width or exact position between the electrodes. The true IP effect within the source i s a lso indeterminate; the anomaly from a very narrow source with a very large true IP effect will be much the same as that from a zone with twice the width and i the true IP effect. The theoretical scale model data shown in Figure 3 and Figure 4 demonstrate this problem. The depth and position of the source are unchanged but the width and true IP effect are varied. The anomalous patterns and magnitudes are essentially the same, hence the data are in sufficient to evaluate the source completely.
The normal practise is to indicate the IP anomalies by solid, broken, or dashed bars, depending upon their degree of distinctiveness. These bars represent the surface projection of the anomalous zones as inter preted from the location of the transmitter and receiver electrodes when the anomalous values were measured. As illustrated in Figure l, Figure 2 Figure. 3 and Figure 4, no anomaly can be located with more accuracy than the spread length. While the centre of the solid bar indicating the anomaly corresponds fairly well with the source, the length of the bar should not be taken to represent the exact edges of the anomalous material.
- 2 -
If the source is shallow, the anomaly can be better evaluatedusing a shorter electrode interval. When the electrode interval used approaches the width of the source, the apparent effects measured will be nearly equal to the true effects within the source. When there is some depth to the top of the source, it is not possible to use electrode intervals that are much less than the depth to the source. In this situation, one must realize that a definite ambiguity exists regarding the width of the source and the IP effect within the source.
Our experience has confirmed the desirability of doing detail. When a reconnaissance IP survey using a relatively large electrode interval indicates the presence of a narrow, shallow source, detail with shorter electrode intervals is necessary in order to better locate, and evaluate, the source. The data of most usefulness is obtained when the maximum apparent IP effect is measured for n ** 2 or n - 3 . For instance, an anomaly orginally located using X = 300' may be checked with X = 200' and then X - 1 00'. The data with X ~ 1 00' will be quite different from the original reconnais sance results with X = 300".
The data shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6 are field results from a greenstone area in Quebec. The expected sources were narrow (less than 30" in width) zones of massive, high-grade, zinc-silver ore. An electrode interval of 200' was used for the reconnaissance survey in order to keep the rate of progress at an acceptable level. The anomalies located were low in magnitude.
The very weak, shallow anomaly shown in Figure 5 is typical of those located by the X - 200' reconnaissance survey. Several anomalies of this type were detailed using shorter electrode intervals. In most cases the detail measurements suggested broad zones of very weak minerali zation. However, in the case of the source at 20N to 22N, the measurements with shorter electrode intervals confirmed the presence of a strong, narrow source. The X = 5 0' results are shown in Figure 6. Subsequent drilling has shown the source to be 12.5' of massive sulphide mineralization con taining significant zinc and silver values.
The change in the anomaly that results when the electrodeinterval is reduced is not unusual. The X = 50' data more accurately locates the narrow source, and permits the geophysicist to make a better evaluation of its importance. The completion of this type of detail is very important, in order to get the maximum usefulness from a reconnaissance IP survey.
Theoretical Induced Polarization and Resistivity Studies
Scale Model Cases
13 l i l l . l J It M 11 13 H II tt t j II 1]
K . II It X l f.l I.I li II li /I.I
II
II II
(P/Z TT) o
11 l l l S l l l l It II li l] II 11 K 17 II It
(f*)o
II 11 1 \ l 7 l l n I I H 11 11 15 II 11 II 11
l l l
(Mf)o
li n n i) n D li IT 11 it
(Mf) - O
Ufcittff o*ri*4M*r*w
2-51
(Mf) 2- OOOO
t f C ) O * 25 X
IHtrtfW Mwr
7
CASE . g-O-5-BU-IO-o
Theoretical Induced Polarization and Resistivity Studies
Scale Model Cases
i i 11 i ie M ii n n is n D n it
II II 11 l.T I.I I.I I.I I.I 1.1 \ II II II
CI II ( ! l l l t II 11 11 13 n IS II It II II
(ft)o
t l l 3 t ! l l l ) H II 11 13 H IS II 11 II 11
(Mf)o
n li n n it K n i) n
(Mf) . O (Mf) g* 9250
(ft) 2*l
KfllM HKT
•i * i ' i ' ;
CASE B-^S-BU-IO-o
THEORETICAL INDUCED POLARIZATION
AND
RESISTIVITY STUDIES
SCALE MODEL CASE
PLAN V IEW
10 H 12 l? 14 l *,
K) ; l?
•- l -*-*- n* -**- x
(vX .-(T;
X x \
X EQUALS l UNIT
n-i- n-2- n-3-
•W 10X) 10
10 10 10
n-4 K) K) 10
97 86 97 \IO tO tO
95 87 87 95 N. 10 10 10
68 89 68 *V\IO 10 10
88 90 90 88 92 \ 10 10 10
89 K) II 12 13 14 15 16
n-4—O -03 -06
B 9 10 l! g 14 l? IS
n-4 O -30 -59
89 10 I.I 12 13 14 15 16
(P2ir\ - 10
(Mf), -O {Mf ) 2 * 1 1700 (Fe)2 * 30'^
DEPTH EXTENT OF SOURCEi 4 UNITS
FIG.3
THEORETICAL NDUCED POLARIZATION
AND
RESISTIVITY STUDIES
SCALE MODEL CASE
PLAN VIEW
O M 'g
t B n i4
x -~~~ n x
X EQUALS l UNIT
n -i K) 10K) K)
99 93 99 V 10 tO 10
97 91 . 91 97N. to 10 109-2 92 92 9 7\. 10 10 10
J6\ 10 10 K),o'0 ,o 96 9.3 9 3 9 3 93
9 10 II lg 13 14 K 16
n -4—0 O -O7 ' 08
(Fe)o35 \\\0 -03 O O
-08 O O
45 4*\X\05 -08 O O
42^,07 -07 O O
10 II 12 13 14 15 '__16
n .4 O O -70 83
S 6 7 B 9 ' Ip I.I 12 13 14 15 16
\ MO
(Mf)| -O ' 228OO
— I-
OCPTH EXTENT OF SOURCE 4 UNITS
FIG 4
INDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY RESULTS
BATCHELOR LAKE AREA, QUEBEC. .
INDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY RESULTS
BATCHELOR LAKE AREA, QUEBEC.
U80// 4040 l 6170 6000yV l lTOO S I 3J01
•J—1500 f ./4800. mo l /7600 J //ZOSO J//BOO XXV3T20\\\~ 12000
ON I2N I4N ' I6N I8N 20N ' 22N ' 24N 26N 2BN^ x f f f f
• l — 0-13 O-ll 0-M O 0-S9 M ''IVX/ 0-1 O 0-1
.1————0'57 0-19 0-18 t 0 -2 O'BB 0-76 O 0-1
.3————————O'SI '0-1 ^22 0-2* 0-6* 0-12 O(M. F.) i
I9N 20 N 2IN 22N 23 N
Ml
ON I2N I4N 16N ION 20N ' 22N ' 24N 26N 28N
(Rr.it
23N
"•l-1-7 1*6 V t'l 4 -3 0-24 0-1
ION I2N 14N I6N - I6N 20N 22N 24N 26N 28N
MASSIVE SULPHIDE
ZONE
2-t S 4 -8 4-9 /^ J-t
I9N 20N 2IN 22N 23N
GLACIAL OVERBURDEN
MASSIVE SULPHIDE ZONE *~~
FIG.5
GREENSTONE
FIG. 6
tario
Ministry of Natural ResourcesGEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL
TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT
FUe.
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Survey(s) INDUCED POLARIZATION 6 RESISTIVITY
Township o Claim Holde
Survey Com
Author of F
Address of j
Covering Da
Total Miles
r Area WABIKOBA LAKE AREA G 620
,r / v HEMLO EXPLORATIONS LTD. -'w ———————————————————————————————————
pany PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS T .TO.
.eporl PHOENIX fiF.OPHYRir.R T .TT).
. , 200 YORKLAND BLVD., WILLOWDALE, ONTARIO \iithor * *
ites of Surve
of Line Cut
.v 01/03/84 to 18/03/84-y- ——————————————————————
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
^^NTER 40 days (includes |^ne cutting) for first
survey.
ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
AIRBORNE CREDITSMagnetome
DATE: ^
Res. Geol.
ter 1
\-vx~V U'n
Previous SurveysFile No.
i..............
Type
(Special provii
ilectromagr(enter (
SIGMA
(linecutting to office)
DAYS— , . , per claim Geophysical— Fl''''trnrn^gr"'t "'— MpgnptnmMrr
— Radiomftrir , ,. .-.,--nt K^rC,pn]ng\nt\
r,fnrYirni\\ra\
lion credits do not apply to airborne surveys)
iptir RaHinmptrirays per claim)
rim r.- uX\Wf-Author of Report or Agent
Qualifications (f;^ ' '(-'O
Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
T. B. 656588(prefix) (number)
656589
656590
656591
656592
656593
656594
656595
656596
656597
657419
657420
657423
TWT* A. T /"*I A IKjf C J- JTOTAL CLAlMa. ————————————— —
Ontario
Ministryof Report of Work ^ Natural ,- , . . - . . , Resources (Geophysical. Geological,
Geochemical and Expendittf
The MiniType of Survey(s)—————————————————————————————————————————— 42C13SWS)829 2 .6813 WABIKOBA LAKE 300
INDUCED POLARIZATION SURVEY f, RESISTIVITY WABIKOBA,AKEEAG-620Claim Holdor(s)
HEMLO EXPLORATIONS LTD. T 1360
Survey Company
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTD.Date of Survey (from Ri to) Total Miles oTlfne~CuF"
Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)
______ PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTD., 200 YORKLAND BLVD., WILLOWDALE ONTARIOCredits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
For first survey:
Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here
Airborne Credits
Note: Special provisionscredits do not applyto Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
—— ot^^'P-)
Geological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Days perClaim
-~— — —
- —— ——
Days per Claim
20
Days per Claim
—— . ———
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)
Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)
Type of Work Performed
Performed on Claim(s)
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits
Total ExpendituresTotal
Days Credits
-r 1 5Instructions
Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.
Mining ClaimPrefix
T. B.
-. ' ,. -.,,'.,,**
Number
656588
o565S9 .
656590 ,
656591
656592
656593.
656594 .
656595 -
656596
656597
657419
657420
657423
Expend. Days Cr.
Mining ClaimPrefix
,; ,, ; .
Number
————— .--... ——— ,—
Expend. Days Cr.
—— .. ——
Total number of mining claims covered by this i o report of work. ^ -^
Date
May 7, 1984Recorded Holder or Agent (Signature)
Certification Verifying Report of Work
Total Days Cr. Date Recorded Recorded
l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed heTeto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.
Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying
D. HOWE c/o OREQUEST CONSULTANTS LTD. 404 - 595 HOWE STREET, VANCOUVER B.C.
V6C 275Date Certified
May 7, 1984Certified by (Signature)
1362 (85/9)
Mining Lands Section
Control Sheet
File No
TYPE OF SURVEY
MINING LANDS COMMENTS:
GEOPHYSICAL
GEOLOGICAL
GEOCHEMICAL
EXPENDITURE
LOSignature of Assessor
3/*? r^iDate
1984 06 11 Your File: 243 Our File: 2.6813
Mrs. A.M. HayesMining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 566
Dear Madam:
Me have received reports and maps for a Geophysical (Induced Polarization) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims TB 656588 et al 1n the Area of Wabikoba Lake.
This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.
Yours sincerely.
S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch
Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-4888
A. Barr:me
cc: Hemlo Explorations Ltd Suite 1550 609 GranvWe Street Vancouver, B.C. V7Y 1C6
cc: Ore Quest Consultants Ltd Suite 404 595 Howe Street Vancouver, B.C. V6C 2T5
L&.
yi/
L.±t/
•xy/ii i
i::n
r
l" l i
E.M. CONDUCTOR SYMBOLS
DEFINITE
PROBABLE
POSSIBLE
42C13SW0829 2.6813 WABIKOBA LAKE
HEMLO EXPL. GRID LINE-32E X = l 5 0 F P H Ci C O H M - M ')
D I F' O L E H U M B E F:C O O R D I N R T E 2 25 O S 1950S 1350 S l 0 5 0 SINTERPRETfiTIO
M* l 12K ,- 8689..- 19K 19*
16 11 l 34 5 O S
6830- 1 l IK
MM
•N-6
10K 0K.. 9048 ..
UK '"' UK 12K
00S 3061 "v^-10^/ 7629
4226 X'^S/ '^617^:^.860:::
9637 ,-y'482? 4894V X" 6732 ,/ 3664' X 2017
..3066 { 6644 73?5 /4I33 4727.
314" 4S15 V - 1 '' 9818 v -'4346 ^525P
HEMLO E .X F' L GRID L I H E - 3 2 E X * l 5 d F P H fi S E ( l 0 H Z
DIPOLE N U M B E F: l 0
COORDIHPTE SJ 5 O S. l O 5 O ':. 450 SI M T E R P R E T R T I D M
\\~ l 12
11
11
8.2 7.8 - 9.5
10" x 7.8:~V ,'~mrr:10 12 yf'U
t-, i 10
. 4.
7.1
- N = 5
I i' ' \ m-~
\ 1 6X,;:'-:''3.2 .--"'
10
8.7 9.1 8.1 - -"''
HEMLO EXPL GRID LINE-32E X ̂ l 5 0 F M E T R L F R C T Ci R
Ci I P O L E H U M E: E RCOORDIHRTE 22503 165GS
l 0 l l l 31350 5 M :-, 4 5 0 S.
INTERPRET RT ION
N- l .1 .1 .04 .1
N-2 .1 .1 .09 .09 .2
N*3 .1 .1 .1 .1
N*4 .1 .09 .2 .03
.09 .1 (.02)
.1 ,05 .06 .2 .2 .1
.09 .05 .2 .2 .09 .0?
.03 .07 .1 .2 .1 .2
.1 .2 .1 .1 .1 .1
.t?9 .2 .2 .08 .07 .2
.1
.1
200
l 4
Hs3'-
N = 5
N = 6
111 l 2 T l 3 l 14
[4 = 2-
N = 5
14
= l -
(4 = 3 -
DUG N O . - I P - 5375-7
HEMLO E X F' L O R fi T I O H S LTDH E M L C' E X P L . G F: I Ci
W fi B I Y. O B fi L R K: E R P E R - O M T R R T O
LINE N O . - 3 2 E
3
P L O T T I H C F' O I N T — y. - i 5 o
ir. U R F fi C E PROJECTION OF RN O M R L O U s ZONE
C' E T I N I T EPROBABLE •••••••••i VPOSSIBLE ^^^-*^ V
FREC1UEMCY 'HERTZ l 0 HZ
MOTE- C ON T OUR':. ft T LOGARITHMIC I N T E R l.' fi L S l - - l
D R T E c . l -f. 4
DATE
P H O E H IX G E O P H Y S I C S LTD
INDUCED POLflPIZfiTIOH
HMD P E S I S T I '-'I TV SUP'-'EY
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LIMITEDINDUCED POLARIZATION AND RESISTIVITY SURVEY
PLAN MAP
56+OON-
52+OON-
48+OON-
44+OON-
40+OON-
36+OON-
32+OON-
28+OON-
24 + OON-
20+OON-
I6+OON-
I2+OON-
8+OON-
4+OON-
0 + 00-
O l
true northmagnetic north
-0+00
-4+OOS
-8+OOS
- 12+OOS
-16+00'S
-20+OOS
-24+OOS
-28+OOS
-32+OOS
-36+OOS
-40+OOS
MUSHER/ ^S s/f-^
LOCATION MAP
SCALE: l' s It mile
SURFACE PROJECTION OF ANOMALOUS ZONE
DEFINITE —————i Y PROBABLE i iiiiiiiin V POSSIBLE ^•w'w V
- E.M. CONDUCTOR AXIS
HEMLO EXPLORATIONS LIMITEDWABIKOBA LAKE AREA , THUNDER BAY M.D.
ONTARIO
LEGEND
-CLAIM BOUNDARY
D -CLAIM POST
' AT END OF ANOMALIES ES SPREAD USED.
SCALE400 400 800 iaoo 1600 FEET
EXTENT OF I.R. SURVEY }'4800
DRAWN:
42C13SW0029 2.6613 WABIKOBA LAKE 210
E.M. CONDUCTOR SYMBOLS
DEFINITE
PROBABLE
POSSIBLE
42CI3SW0029 2.6813 WABIKOBA LAKE
1HE ML Q EXFL . G P ID -- L 1 NE -24 W XM59F RHO CDHM-M)
DIPOLE NUMBER li 213 4 1 5 I 6 1 7 8 l 9 10 11 12 13COORDINfiTE 2490(4 2. 7 09 H 3000(4 33 9 ON A 3660N 3900N 4 20 3 1)IHTERPRETRTION . . W H - .
i i v V (4=1 9624 ..5024, 3884 -,. 9344 ,;;, v-4662 -1255 1080 y \2111 .3619^/5285,, 3489 \ 566? (4 = 1-
•14 = 2 9425 8249 \'-v4474 3891 33t)6 V 2163 2461 "'^1775 "\2938 \\5777 y'" 4321 4971, ^9037 (4 = 2-
-(•1 = 3 5299 7411; 3178"--, 5299;y'';i740 -, 2921-'"' 3915 3988 'v;-J936) 2900'-.... 4939 4S58/ ' 6960 (4 = 3 -
•(4 = 4 5695 5612 S 8 700 9222) ^885 " \ 1715) ( 48"2/ 5945 59620^95* 2065 " \ 4F6 / ' 6670 (4 = 4-
-(-4 = 5 493^ 7379-^*7860 9769 -' 501tf v 305*9""- 2867' ;' 6863 7173' ^"7764" -1 '--'- 224? 2244"' -'''5643 (4 = 5-
•(4 = 6 (4 = 6 -
H E M L O E y. P L G P I DI L I N E - 2 4 W X ^ 1 5 0 F p H R '-. E ' 1 . 9 H Z -
D I F' 0 L E N U M E E F' 1 2 3 4 5 6 ~ j * I 9 10 11 1 2 i 1 3C 0 0 P D I N R T E 24 0 9 M 2 7 0 O H 3000(4 3 3 9 0 N 3 600(1 3 9 0 0 N 42 9 9 NINTERPPETRT10N , , , . , , , .
•(4=1 3.3 7,j -,. 7 f , 10 , 8.6 \ 7 6.1 --.. 3.5 4.1 ,- , 3.3 . 6.4 ,- 9.* (4=1 -
-(•4 = 2: 9.3 -; 11 v 7.7 3.9 9.6 ,\3 7.6 "'"f". 6 " -. . 3.8 , \7.9^./' 5.9 .r.5 \11 N * 2 ~
•(4 = 3 25 "'\-.v -,9.3 ) 14 '"\ 9.4 9.9 -;" 6.9' ' . 7.8 7.6 7. P ---^ ^ 6.9 5.5 6.6 ) t. 3 (4 = 3 ~
•(•1 = 4 7.6'-;:,;\ 25 ' t : 1 1 14 "10;- 7.8 "- 7.] "- 7.5 8 f.' 1 1 ; \ i'4.4 ) 6 .1 .:--'7.5 (4 = 4 -
-(4 = 5 7.? y.e":; "- 18 11 12 -' 7.9 ? ' 7 7.1 v ' 11 7.8' 5.7 9 ^4 = 5-
•11 = 6 . Ns6 -
m
H E fi L 0 E X P L . GRIT' -- L I tt E - 2 4 l-J X * 1 5 9 F ri E T R L F H C. T 0 P
D I P 0 L E N U M E E R 1 2 3 4 5 6 j 7 B 9 1 S 1 1 1 1 1 2 j 1 3 ^C 0 0 P D I (l R T E 2 4 9 9 (4 2700 H 3 0 0 0 f J 33 0 0 N 3 6 0 0(4 3 9 O 0 (J 4 2 9 9 HINTERPRETRTION , , , , i i i
-(4=1 .09 .1 .2 .1 .5 .6 .6 .2 . 1 .2 .2 .2' N - 1 -
•N^ .1 .1 .2 .2 .3 .4 .3 .4 .2 .1 .1 .^ .1 . (4 = 2 -
-(4 = 3 .5 .1 .2 .2 .6 .2 .2 .2 .4 .2 .1 .1 .1 14 = 3-
•(4 = 4 .1 .4 .1 .2' .3 .5 .1 .1 .2 . 4 .2 .1 .1 (4 = 4 -
.2 .1 .2 .1 .2 .3 .3 .1 .1 .1 .3 .3 .2 (4 = 5-
(4 = 6 -
sao
D 1-4 G (4 0 . - i p - 5375 - |
H E M L 0 E X P L 0 R fi T I 0 N S LTD.H E M L 0 E X P L GRID
WflBIKOPfi LRf:E RRER -' OtJTRPIO
LINE NO . -24U
'•HI lin1 . ," .
i — {M — i i — m — iT 1 FT I- i
PLOTTING POT to ^ - - 1 50 f
s U P F R C E P P u j E C T I i' (J 0 F R (f 0 M M L 0 IJ -; Z ONE
- /\ F ' F' i J B R B L E * ' ' ' * B ' * " * V
d '
F F: E L! U E N C' Y ' H E R T I ' D R T E S U yffiffiJL^jfa^l 9 8 4
|*?p'r MAI J '^ Si *' >'NOTE- CONTOUR :. \ [^ ^ ^*v7 .'3i '-' **RT LO G ft P J l H Ml L " —— — -t-*f'— i- -y T 1
INTEPWftLS J;-!^ n flTp ^̂ ^ry^M
P H 0 E H I X G E 0 P H Y S I C S LTD.
INDUCED POLflRIZflTIOH
HMD P ESI ST F '..' I T Y SUPVEV
E.M. CONDUCTOR SYMBOLS
DEFINITE
PROBABLE
POSSIBLE
42C13S*ee29 2.6B13 WABIKOBA LAKE 330
H t HI n t ;:PL r, P Id L l HE- l
* l
:-;M50F P HO ' OHM-M)
. i 3 T36QQN
""' 1 '" 3
4 5 00 Mt—
M- 3 141-
in14*: UK
17K "t 1 4K ,'
13K
H^ l
1 f rf.-' - ' \ \ f#'
/-^W'' .^1947
H ' 6
H F HI O Flirt. ij
P IE Q EI "T y si EFT*iTiT E P FFE i FFrTciTT
ID L i NE- i s ;:-l ^.0F PHfl':.E O 3h
: 3IIT H.." T lHItlZZ IIZ—j-..-™. --^..™.—..l 10 13
tl
10 11 TN
9.4, 9.7 . li
^"A l i i \i • u*/ v 11
'-, 9.5 -^ 11 ,-
b. l '' 9.? '7.1
.4 , ^ l -
3.1
4.;"!
H-4
H-5
TOPOGRAPHY LAKE
HE ML O E:: F L GP ID L I NE- 16 ME mi rnt TOR
i N'T L P r p'ETS T T oli"""""
'T~~3~ "T"'4"""T"5 p-g-—p—^ ] g700 H 00033 0 0N
.j.^II-AilIlL4.j]Lj.5j;jE-Ls.™
M * 2
tl-4
.3 .07 .1 .0? .0ft .09 .1 .06 .1
.09 ,0S .06 .1 .0'.-: .08 .08 .08 .1
.^ .06 .W. . 1 .0-1 ,0S .07 .2 .4
.07 .06 .os {o J .04 .05 .2 .4
.os .07 (-.o;--j TN .04 .1 .4 .3
•——-f- 1.1 --
.1 .1
.05
.6
.or-
.J
—L._____^.™,.--^.^.-. .._______L,
.4 .5 .4
.4 .4
.1 ,3
M-3
DWG t in -r P - 5375-2
H E N L O E X P L O R R T I O H S 1. T DH E Ml O E ! "'. P L. GRID
W fi R I l' O P f) L fl t' E fl F F fl O H l fi P I O
L I ME MO - l 6U
~——N X j:':PLOTTIMGPHI NT :-;^ i 5o
'~. 11 f-T n L. F F' P O J E C T I O M OF R M O M rt L O U ':- Z O M F
DEFI HI TE FROBRBL E POS? t BLF *.^"*^ V
FPEi'-UEHCV -'HE P T!7, ) l 0 HZ
H O T E - C O M T O U R 'lRT LOGRFITHMIC IHTERVRLS l , -l,5- -2 i - 3 , - 5 . - 7 5 , - l 0
O FI T E SUH F' F F' O
l :? ft 4
D fi l E
P H O E H I X G E O P H Y S I C S L T D
I HOUCE O PC LRPIZflTI ON
RND PES I S T I '..'I TV S U P'J E Y
E.M. CONDUCTOR SYMBOLS
DEFINITE
PROBABLE
POSSIBLE
42CI3SW0829 5.6813 WABIKOBA LAKE 24-0
H E M L O E X P L G F: I L' ; LINE- tf -f 0 0 X s l 5 0 F . R H O ':. O H M - M
P I ROLE NUMBEF:C O ORO IN (H T E 400:;, l 0 0 S
INTERPPETRTIONN- l
l O l l l 2 14 115 l i e 20 21e o N 3 0 0 N l 10 UN l 4 0 O H 1700 N 2000N 2309N Z' 6 O 0 N 2900 N 3 S O 0 N
\-\~A
H* 5
,,.5960.,' 3333,- 2342.. 4745,.- x 14K ,,\2U \ 1 8*'
695 556* X, 131'
5003 5228 ""•-
5841 ^' 4618 ^100i '^,
5887- 4575 ''*V
18K SJ28K/// 8028,'.- V.22K
3 l4 l 00 M
14K /. 19K .
12K /. { 3301 /' 2
171. ;y':'5220.- (2424.X''6
6652 /' 3748 X 5945
24K
19K 16K
/' 22K \ '-'' y
-' 201:
in ,. "' 28K
131 22K 'J. 14K
20K/ 17K ''x 25K V\ UK X-"' 22K
9|- ,y 43K 10K 13K I
241 v 19K
22t 2U-
"-- 15K S 2 4K x 37
l IK u' "30T 401-
19K ) 25K /)^524.\X^10K V'22K \ 16K x' UK "'-\:\5220 ^ \-.
23K ^ H K" V 7804 v 13K X- 27K 'xy'^242''- 399'
H E M L Ci E X P L , G P I D -- L I H E - 6 * 0 0 X - l 5 O F P H R E; E vi 0 H Z )
D I F' C' L E H U FI E: E F' l G l l 12 l 14 1 7 18 il ? 24COOF'DINFlTE 460S- 1 0 O S 2 O O H 5 O ON z- e e N l l d O N l 498N 1709 H 2 O 0 0 N 2 390N 2606N 2900N
30 T 3 l3200 H 3500N 3 S O G H 4 l O i3 M
I N T E P P P E T R T I O N
N^3
MS 4
N ^ 5
\\ = {.
11 n 15,. 12
10
17 11 , -' 9 .1 8 \ 13
,- 17 /"-vS.3 /-., 16 \ '''..8.6^
29 :- /' 1 2 11 11 X J?
12 X 19 ^ 11 ,,-;/' 26
'l5 '"' 11 '''-" 27 TN
14 X"' l ? 1 ~ v4^ X 8-4 , 13
: ( 16) 17 19 N-O'^J\.-^ 13 x ?-19 16 "' " 8.1""'""- X2^'' ""- 14 --1 8.6
?.4 9. Q 9.^- 8J?
/' 10 \ 9.6 8 S.9 ^; .6 '
14 19 \ S.& 8.5 9.6 ( 5.7
l 14 10" 12 \ 'fA^--^, 7.7
11 t-.t '.l .7___7.8 9.!
. ; 6.4 \. 8.4 /
10 14e -. 12\ 8 .4 . 12 ( 9 8.4 9-7 ,' 6.4 \ 8.4 /' 12 'L , S.7 - ^ 19 .-'" 13 12V \ '| - f ^ x '-- -.__^.'
r.lX -: -t ""N.10^--, S.5 8.1 ,X"7.1 5.9 ; ( 11 /' 18 ^x e.l^"~^-x^0_ _10 11
7.5 '\. 11 \ 7.
11
5
.6
13 10 10'- x 6.6 "' 8,4
.X s.i ':'^'\^/ :̂.z^'••\'-\^A_ 7.3) \. 129.2 "' "' '2CT- 7' -"'9.4 ""^v 4.4 3.1 v ' 8.5
H * 2 -
H - 6
.7 "'
N s 3 -
Ms 4 -
N s 5 -
N 5 6 -
TOPOGRAPHY SWAMP
H E M L C' E X P L . GRID - LINE-0 ';'. = l 5 0 F M E T R L F R C T O P
C' I F' C' L E H U M B E R l 0 l l 12 l 3 l 4 15 j l' l 5 21 c. -i i 4 30 3 l 32C O O R Ci I N R T E 4 O G S 20QN 5&0N S 0 O N l 100N l 4 0 0 N 1700 N 2 O O 0 N 0 N 2600 N 3 0 0 H 2 0 0 N 3 5 O O N 3 S O O N 4 l 0 0 HI N T E R F' F: E T R T I O H
= l .08 .0?
.OS .1
.1.2
.09 .06 .07 .06 .97 .0 .05 .96 .95 .05 .93 .1 .96 .95 .06 .04 -OS .1 .89 .87
.06 .93 .04 .OS .05
.4
.1 .4
.3 .1 .05
. l .04 .05 .64 .04 .06 .05 .04 .03 .09 .05 .09 .06 .07 .3 .1 .2 .1 .07
.4 .3 .2 .68 .04 .05 .OS .05 .05 .04 .95 .04 .05 .93 ,03 .05 .07 .1 .04 .95 .06 .6 .03 .07 .07 .8
.4 .5 x;:l|.6)'/ .1 .1 .04 .09 .03 .06 .94 ,06 .06 .05 .03 .63 .94 .05 .2 .97 .03 .05 .1 .04 .04 .94 -. '\, ~2
.94 .94 .06 .05 .95 .06 .03 .91 .04 .04 .1 .09 .95 .93 .2 .08 .98 .02 .6TN A -l -0? -07
H s l -i
(1 = 2
Ms 3
NM
H = 5
N = 6
DWG NO. - l P - 5375-3
H E M L O E X P L O R R T I O N S LTDH E M L O E X P L . GRID
W R B I K. O B fi L R K E fi R E R O N T R R I O
LINE NO -0+00
H ^
F 1 L O T T I N G F' O i H T —— X ^ l 5 0
SUPFflCE PROJECT I ON OF ftNO MR L O US ZONE
DEFINITEF' F' O E: ft E L E •••••••••iPOSSIBLE ^^^-^
F F: E C' i.l E N C Y ( H E F' T r j l O HZ
H O T E - C O H T i j U R S fi T LOG RF: I THMICi NTE'PURLS i . - i 5
D R T E S URpppog
? S 4
DRTE
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTD.INDUCED P OLRPIZRTION
R N D P E S I S T I '-.' I T Y ? ij p-',' E Y
E.M. CONDUCTOR SYMBOLS
DEFINITE
PROBABLE
POSSIBLE
42C13SWOIB29 2.6813 WABIKOBA LAKE 250
HEMLO EXPL GRID - LINE-SB X^ l 5 OF PH O '-O H M-M
14 15 IS 17 19 20DI POLE NUMBERC O ORO! NflTEI ITT ERR RET RT ION
-.. 4
4—————————t—————————l
. - A ^'TCt ^ O^P1 , -.ir i" "-1-7-90iii-j.* ne t* y -,\y5Di,-. -- ti-j**i i. j f-j————l—————————i————————H—————————i
164"7 , - \3224 -, 2560 2127 -.-- 1152 !3 x 34?. 564 566 ,v 1307..-- 1517.v 4002 3934 . \1976 vJ8^. x 4742V 7277.- 7967 Sl36,vx 1595^————————————K
,V 1933
- H - 5
14K ^177?," 2734 2661 ; 3414 3214 -,. 250? ' y)467 106l""V;,72u
1933,, ~Vt?016 3506 3089 354? 3t01 ,2631 2ti0r-C-,1335..-"
3480 3164 3567 3022 7-601 4350 3306
3612 'r'2?7? 2905'
/' '--2153.,-'32?? .- -,812ti 7*45. /' 3441 ^ 536^,-?259 .N.4375
946 3727 y'5674 v;s- XJ5K '"' 23K'' ::'--4026 -";;''l45'3 ' 1660 -"2626'51P5'- 462'? '" 5631'"- ' 2937 -"'" 4453 3148 3556 364? ''"9290
H E N L O E XPL. GRID : LINE-SE y * l 5 O F P H fi 'B E M . 0 H Z
DIPOLE NUMBER 10 11 12 14 \ 2 4 ^2 it- lCOORDINflTE 5 O r-. 2 5 i? M 5 5 e M S50N 1150 H 1450 M 2350H 2 6 5 fj N 2950 N 3250H 3 55 ON 3S50N 4 l 50 Hl N T E P P P E l R T I O N^ i \^. - \ 4.5 ,..--- 5 v::A...8yv \ -.7.9 8.1 8.2
9.6 /' 5.? 6.1 6.4 "---4^,. ': 9 .4 7.5," 5.2
7 ; : '" 14 ";"- 7.-^.^"''7\5 3.6 7\6, " "'4.7 \
14 ,. '"''7,7 ' 2.5 9.1 '' 7.2 6.S 4.9!
8.6 ?.7 ••'7.2 5.2 6.6
5.'? 5.2 x 3-1 ;- 6.?~.__ f __
5.7 6.2 5.2 \7.6/
5,8 7.2 ..---"' 9 "'X 6.5
- ';7.6 9.6 -••" 11 ,- \ 5 .6'i 6.6 ' 9.9 '-' 12 "' S.? '
11 11 6.3
"-. 9.4 , 16
6.2 ' 9.4
'.9 8.3 '*, 10 IS .i.2 13 ," 5.5
/'' U ..-'9.4
11 "8 - 1 ' 11
6.9
5.5 \7.6 v.. e. l•*~ . \:.3 \ 6.8 \ 3.1 9.8
.2 " -.. 8 .5
4.5 4.7 6.6 ) 9.1 •: 7.1 \.
7.4 4.4 "'-
8.7 ?.y ,- 6.5 5.7
S.9 9.3 ,- 6.6 6
9.3 /' 5.9 6.8 6.2
9.6 /" 6.7 7.4 7.1
6.7
\\~ l -
TOPOGRAPHY SWAMP SWAMP X BOG
HEMLO EXPL . GRID L I ME-SE :' ^ l 5 0 F H E T R L f W l T D P
C' I F' Ci L E H U M D ECOORDINRTE 350^. INTEPRRETflTION
5 d S 2 j ON S 5 0 HT T5 Til l .. IT" 17
l l 50N l450U14 15.16 171819 ^ y 2 l c b ? l
l 756N 2 C' .5 Q h 2350 N 2650H 2950 H 3250 H 3550 N 385 O H 4 l 5 O
S l .62 .4 l .
.y i' .1
.4 .4
.4
.4
.1
,.. 1.2 1.4 ..- .x
. 1.^., .4 .4
.7 .4 .4
.6 .2 . 1. . 1
.4
.1
.1 .1
.05
.1 .1
.4 . l .09
.2 .tl6 .2
.03 .68 .4
.05 .06 .2
.1 .4 .1 .64 .y. .1 .1
'.3 .3
.2 .08 .2
.68 .66
. l .06 .05
.68
.i .1 .1 .4.1 .09 .1 .5
.09 .9? .4 .4
.2 .1 .4 .5
.04
L!!::
DWG . NO . - I P - 5375-4
H E N L O E X P L O R R T I O H S LTDH E M L Ci E X P L . G F: I C:
LflKE Ft P. E Fi ONTflFIO
L I NE HO -8E
H :-
F' L O T T J N GF' O I N T —— :-: s i 5 o
SURFRCE PROJECTION OF HHOMftLOUS "ONE
DEF1NITE M VPROBRBLE •••••••••i ^7
n P OSSI&LE ^-^mm-v y
HERTi 0
D R T E S ij ft
R F' R F' O y
1984
N O T E - C O H T O U R SRT L O G fi P I T H M I C.I N T E F' U f\L'l l , - l 5-2 , -3 , -5 . -7 5 , - l 6 DRTE
P H O E N I X G E O P H Y S I C S LTD.
IHDLIC ED P O L RF: IZRT I ON
RND RES I ST I VJ TV flJPVE
E.M. CONDUCTOR SYMBOLS
DEFINITE
PROBABLE
POSSIBLE
42CI3SW0829 2.6813 WABIKOBA LAKE
HEMLU EXPL GR: I D L l NE- 16E X ~ l 5 0 F F: H O ( O H M - M )
D I F' d L E H U M B E F 1COORDINATE 1400 l 1100 'l 8 O y iINTERPPETRTION* l 15k 171 ,
201. ( 1 41,
161"
* 4
\15K --
14K J' I E
17K/' Itt.xX"
17K //9164 -:-'"4i59
5 00 S M12 13 14 151 16 l 17 l 18 lTT 21
l 0 0 N 40 ON r y 0 H 1000H 13 e o N l 600N
941 V 3096x^1054 v.,2321/ 4036 38tl" 5889 .4611 7366 "174 -4748 .. 1917.-- 2 199 - -, 1577 1??4 - 2201
c. --"24 T
19GON 2 2 3 0 H 2500N
17 -"/
l 31 l 323 l 0 0 H 3 4 O OH
\4694 ,;: .862y 3439. \3374 24SO "\1695// 4551 3751 3746
l 3915 4741 , 2393.., 3480 - X2590 2645 244?
4563/ ^8115^^2072 x 4133 't-0^3/ \\1S23/ \3S9S.. (8167y. -'3859 3290/ 7354152 \5510 "X.4599/7 \ 111 " -,v4
' 3539 ,-V 1327 1523 vv. 450S)/-; 10K v--. 3321: 13K \6474 3903 '-. 6873 5909 6264 3709 \ 2440 ..-'3142 '5722 6283 ) 4*991; { 6743 7237 336 1 3342 4676 3480 x-, 2651- ', ' __ __ 'v- - ' .- '', ~!"-— ' ' ' ' ' '''- -"" - ' ——— '' ''- — '
' ' 4''X^514 } ;'~ 1SK '-4698 4185 /v'l?51,- ,'3219V\:•* .' "- 'm .
19*' -'V8743 •- : 3965 y'5472 X -^ 1670 - ' 33?'? 3355
l IK ; ': 5618; 3654 4596 4199 s 5861"" \ 3778 4541 3609 'y',8365; ^.4913 4241)^.875643'*' " \2\ l?^ '- '7952 -t497 4346 '275?'' ' 6?65 ""8026' 5282 6536 5059"""- 4970- 5612 6997 5338 '-" 3211 4020 "v 5060
3154 X 6525
A -'590?
H E n L O E Y. F ' L GRID L I H E - l 6 E X s l 50 F P H fi S E '-" l . 0HZ
C' I F' Ci L E N U M B E F 1T——4 i e 11 12 IV. 14 15 16 l 7 l 20 l 21 T c. t 1 l TTT
C O C F 1 C I H RT E l 4 O O i l l G O S sees 5 0 0 5 200:- l 0 0 M 4 O CM 700 M l 0 O d N l 300M l 6 0 O H 1980H 2200 H 2500 N 2S00M 3 i sen 4 0 O HI M T E P P P E T R T I O M
12 10 10 10 "•-;- 6.;
13
13
3.8 y L3 H ;- 9.5
leT 12 11 1 X '5.1 /' 12 ,U;:'
3.6 4
'M\ ~ l '"'' 4 ''
O
"1. Q p 12
'^.'•'f:
- c- ^./- c- J-X-V \'''\'"' ,-' 11
- .9.9 7.6 8.3
14 11 ', (7.1
,10 , 8.8 8.6
10__ 10
"15" 10 - 9.7 " 11 1.4
.\,^
-1.7
-, 8.4
14 14 11 . v , .1 (
"'X 11 ( 17 ) ^8.4 'j Z.? _^J5.5 7.3
8.2 ) 14 13 \ ;7.1 ^-t I.? ""X 4.?, :''' "'\, '' -'" 11 13 11 7.3 ''" 1.6' ; " ' 6.7
---..7.8 ( s\2.6x;.,---"5.^ 6.6 'X4.2 "X\8.2 8.5.,--' 6.4 P -; 11 .; i
\ 6 .9 r 8.6i
: 7.5
8.1 ~ l -
6.!
4.4 yfl.ft 8.8 (8.2) "- (7.1) -' 8.1
;. 7.1 ' . 8.8
' "'-III-
12 "Ho")
H - 6
TOPOGRAPHY STREAM STREAM
H E M L O E/: P L G P J D L I ME- l 6 E X* 150F METHL Fft C TOP
D I P OLE NUMBER 10 11 l 2 l : l 4 l t. l 18 19 2 l 24 *1 C; 3 lC OOPDINfiTE 14003 1100 1. 8 G O -l 206':. l 6 0 H 4 00H 700 1600N l 3 0 0 N l 600 M l 9 Q G H 2 2 0 0 H 2 5 O 0 H 2800N 3 l 00N 3400NINTEPPPETfiTI ON
H= l
\ N = 4
.05 .68 .07 .1
.07 .or .07 .07.08 .07 .07 .1
.07 .08 .1
.08 .1 ' .2
.08 .3 .3 .2 .04 ;-.09 .0'? . l
.2 .2 -.1 .1 O -.02 .07 .1
.3 .3 .1 O .07 .01 .04 .O:-4
.2 -.05 .1 -.1 .05 .03 .05 .05
.2 .1 .09 .64 -.06 .06 .04 -.01
.1
.1
.4 .4 .6 .1 .09 .3 .06
.2 .3 .5 .06 .1 .2
.1 .2 .2 .2 .1 .02 .3
.1 .04 .1 .3 ,08 .2
.1 .1 .02 .1 .2 .2 .1
.Ci? .2
.3 .2
.1
.04 .1 .1
.05 .2
(.2) (.2) .2
.4 S l H
.4
.1
H s -i .
.4 (.2) H s 5
aeo
DWG N O -I P -5375-5
H E N L O E X P L O R fi T I O H S L T DH E M L O EXPL. G P I C'
U R E: I Y ". C BR L fi K: E R R E fi O H T fi R I d
LINE NO - l 6E
N :-:
F' L O T T I M GF- Ci i H T — X s l 5 O
'E; U F' F R C E F 1 P O J E C T I O H O F R H O M R L O U 8 Z O N E
[i E F I N I T E F'POFjRBLE POSSIBLE ^-*-*.^-v
FPEOUENC Y ( HERTZ ̂ l O HZ
N O T E - C O H T O U P SRT L O G R F: I T H H I C INTERVALS . l , - l . 5 -2, -3, -5, -7. 5, -10
D R T E S U B*^eSBioMX: l 9 8 4 S .4) ^ - — "vR p p P c, y/^/^^x ̂
. *? l 3 Q \ *•f rf U—— i" pi 1.1 7
DRTE
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTD.
I NDUCED P O L RP I Z RT I ON
RND RESIST I 'J ITY S UP 1.,1 E Y
E.M. CONDUCTOR SYMBOLS
DEFINITE
PROBABLE
POSSIBLE
42C13SW8029 2.6813 WABIKOBA LAKE
HEMLO EXPL GRID LIHE-54E X s l 5 0 F R H Ci (. O H M - M )
O I P O L E H U M Ei E F: T~3 l 4i; O Ci R Ci I H R T E 2 2 5 0 i 1950 'I l 6 5 O S 1350SINTERPRET RT I ONM- l
*
i e 111056S 750S
. : 6134 \ 3773 /s 1 775 32
is A l 14 li- M 150Sf' T1^
15 l 16 l 17 l l S ITl 5 8 H
390 /f 1 423 -.,23ie .3144
\\\
UK
1U
1342 1124 1881 14*7 1146
,
11 ^1523^909,^21vs v—-: V, /y.-
•'^•045 " 4023 '* y~' 24K
2871 2526 2023 X" 3526
\ 2741 / ' 3731 .X 6264/"r
142?' 73w25 "'' \\\. 1 3K
'-- 1 151 ''K 2669
7865
- N = 6
HEMLO EXPL GRID L l HE-24 E X* 150F RHRSE -:: l . 0HZ'1
D I F1 Ci L E N U M E: E P1 l l l 2 l 3 14 15 l 9COOFDINRTE 9 5 C S i e 5 e s 1359S 1050 8 4 5 C S 5 O H 4 5 OINTERPRET RT I OHs l 10 10
10
-. 10 \ 9.6 .'
9.5 , 10,' \ 5.8
6.1 7.6., 5.1
6.2 6.9 6.9
\ 1.1 x, 4-e 3-s 4-7 V ' 1-6/i1 "', l"\ /---^ r—-, .———' ---~'-} '-:'--.6.8 '.3 ; '\ 2 /V -.6*..' 5.8 t '.2.7' '
10'; 8.9 s10____( 10 -C..^ 9'i
i'-i .t-, 11
8.5 .;" 11 '-.. 8.5 v
9.6 '* 13
•3 ^ ' -;l d ? ''' -v S -fC": -' S -'" 4O.' , -, *T.il , p '."j-, *O "^/'- ^ •-1 -' "
\ '-, /' 'v;... ^——____—-' 8.2 7.9'^V 2,5 ":-:-.. .5 "^ 2.? 2.
\ /~" •r e i. /' ir
1.1
H s 6
TOPOGRAPHY LAKE SWAMP
HEMLO EXPL GPID LIIIE-24E X - l 5 O F M E T R L F Fi C T O R
D'lPOLE NUMBER l 0 l l 12 l l SOORDINfiTE 2250':. l l 6 5 O S 1050S 1503. l 5 ON 4 5 0 r,
INTERPRET FIT ION
N s 3
N*4
- H ' 5
- N ^ f.
.1 .1 .0& .07 .05 .04
.1 .1 .0.-* .05: .0? .05
.1 .0? .1 .1 .06 .3
.1 .09 .0? .0? .7
.1 .1 .OS .5 .3
.2 .1 .3
.2 .1 .04 .2
.1 .04 .03
.1 .07 .04 .05
.03 .93 .1
.04 .1 .1 .4 .1 ...J^V ...L.
.1 .1 .6 .1 -.05 .r..4 .2 .3 .2 .02 .1 .1
.4
.1
.t-
.e.07 .01 .04 .07 .1 .03
.03 .02 .03 .1 .05
2 W
r, l -
H = 3 -
H a 5
i'W
11 = 4
H s 5
N = 6
DWG NO -I P-5375-6
HEMLO E XPL OR fi T I O N S LTDHEMLO E X P L . G F' I D
WRBIKOBfl LflKE RPEft - ONTRRIO
LINE NO - 2 4E
F' L O T T I H G P Q I H T —— X = l 5 O
SlJPFRCE PROJECT I ON OF H MOM R L O US ZONE
DEFINITE RPOBRBLE POSSIBLE ^-%-v^* V
F p E O IJ E N C V ''HERTZ.'i 0 H r
H O T E - C D N T O LI P SRT L O G R R I T H M I i:I N T E R U R L S l , - l 5 -2.~Z.- 5.-7.5.-10
DATE 1984
D Fi T E
PHOENIX GEOPHYSICS LTD
INDUCED POLflPIZRTIOH
HMD RESIST I VI TV SURVEY