Roundtable 2006 bright_2

25
Proposal Establish a company standard for measurement of Business Penetration

description

 

Transcript of Roundtable 2006 bright_2

Page 1: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

Proposal

Establish a company standard for

measurement of Business Penetration

Page 2: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

Current Status

• Inconsistent use of sources of both business’

advertising and businesses in the market.

• Inconsistent factors used to define an

“advertiser”.

• No standard for what businesses are included,

or how they are excluded from the calculations

• No consistency from year to year in process

Page 3: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

Needs

• Single approach to the calculations

• Consistent approach to the calculations

• Repeatable approach to the calculations

• Year-over-year trending capabilities

• Ability to “drill” into segments

Page 4: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

New approach

• Agreement between key departments on

definitions and rules: – Determining advertisers

– Determining what advertisements “count”

– Determining segments (cleanup effort)

– Determining businesses

– Filtering businesses

– Revisiting “rules” annually

Page 5: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

The New Approach

• Determining advertisers:

– Single source: The Data Warehouse

– SAOE or Mactive account numbers define unique advertisers.

– The SIC code on the account record defines segment.

– The ZIP Code of the advertiser determines Zone.

– Advertisers placing Transient ads are NOT included in the analysis.

Page 6: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

The New Approach

• Determining Businesses

– Single source: Dun and Bradstreet File

– Businesses are limited to Maricopa and Pinal

County.

– A unique “Global Ultimate Duns Number”

determines unique businesses.

– The SIC1 code determines segment.

– The Physical ZIP Code determines Zone.

Page 7: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

The New Approach

• Refining business count:

– Within each SIC code grouping, each “Line of

Business” is reviewed for advertising

potential.

– Lines of Business where there is no

expectation of ever seeing advertising are

removed from the count of businesses.

• This process removes businesses like “Aircraft

engines and engine parts” and “Anthracite mining”

from the business counts.

Page 8: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

The New Approach

• Refining business count continued…

– With specific Lines of Businesses removed, a realistic list of businesses remain.

– However, within that list, there are small businesses and other groups of businesses that will never advertise.

– A unique “Potential Advertiser Adjustment Factor” is applied to each segment to put a segment level filter to arrive at a final business potential count.

Page 9: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

The New Approach

• Rules:

– The Lines of Business excluded will be reviewed

annually. Adjustments to the list will be carefully

weighed and agreed upon before implementation.

– The final “Potential Advertiser Adjustment Factor” will

be reviewed annually. Adjustments to the list will be

carefully weighed and agreed upon before

implementation.

– ONLY ONE VERSION OF THESE ADJUSTMENT

FACTORS WILL BE USED AT ANY GIVEN TIME.

Page 10: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

Putting it together

Page 11: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

Putting it together

RAW Number from Dun And

Bradstreet Business License file

Page 12: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

Putting it together Before

After

Page 13: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

Putting it together

Dun And Bradstreet Business License

file number AFTER removal of

“Children” account numbers

Page 14: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

Putting it Together

Lines of

Business

REMOVED

from count

of

Businesses

Page 15: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

Putting it together

% of Businesses remaining after removal

of SIC Code/Lines of business that are

realistically “never” going to advertise.

Number of Businesses remaining

Page 16: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

Putting it Together

Sample segment: Casino

Of the 21 remaining

businesses, only about

45% look (by name) to

have any potential of ever

advertising.

This is the “factor” that

will be toughest to refine.

Page 17: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

Putting it together

The Percentage and number of realistic

advertisers remaining. From here the

penetration can be calculated.

Page 18: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

Putting it together

Total of all advertisers running ads so far

this year running in each category.

Page 19: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

Putting it together

Total of advertisers with Metro ZIP Codes

running ads so far this year running in

each category.

Page 20: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

Putting it together

How our advertising is split across the

segments.

Page 21: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

Putting it together

How businesses are split across the

segments.

Page 22: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

Putting it together

Advertising penetration when calculated

against ALL advertisers.

Page 23: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

Putting it together

Advertising penetration when calculated

against advertisers with Metro ZIP Codes

(that is local vs. Nevada or otherwise

located.

Page 24: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

Additional Features

Page 25: Roundtable 2006 bright_2

Additional Features