Rosenbusch Dahlberg Lueth Lien Chiang Elementary School Chinese Programs
-
Upload
asia-society-education-programs -
Category
Education
-
view
1.265 -
download
0
Transcript of Rosenbusch Dahlberg Lueth Lien Chiang Elementary School Chinese Programs
Asking the Right Questions:Crafting a Plan for an
Elementary School Chinese Program
Marcia Rosenbusch • Carol Ann Dahlberg
Betsy Lueth • Luyi Lien • Janna Chiang
NCLC Chicago, 2009
Why?
Lessons from the Past
and
Risks in the Future
Our profession in the past….
• Wave of Immigrants: 1850-1900
QuickTime™ and aTIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Our profession in the past….
• Chinese Immigrants: 1849-1882
Chinese Language Schools, aka Chinese Heritage Schools
• Date back to 1848• By 1997 there were 82,675 students, 634
schools• In the 1930s schools in Los Angeles, San
Diego, Washington, D.C., New Orleans, Minneapolis, Oakland--among others
• Goal: keep language and culture alive!
Our profession in the past….
• World War I: 1914-1918
Our profession in the past….
World War II – 1939-1945
Our profession in the past….
Wake-up call forMathSciencesLanguages (especially Russian!)
Our profession in the past….
Our profession in the past….
1.1. Lack of qualified teachersLack of qualified teachers
2.2. Inappropriate goalsInappropriate goals
3.3. Lack of articulationLack of articulation
4.4. Inappropriate instruction Inappropriate instruction and/or deliveryand/or delivery
What factors have What factors have impacted our impacted our
profession in recent profession in recent times?times?
National Standards: Students
Standards for Foreign Language Education: Preparing for the 21st Century
The Vision…The Vision…• All students can be successful language and
culture learners.• Language and culture education is part of the core
curriculum.(p. 7)
National Standards: Teachers
FL Teacher Candidates ACTFL/NCATE Program Standards for the Preparation of FL Teachers, 2002 ACTFL/NCATEACTFL/NCATE
Beginning FL Teachers Standards for Licensing Beginning FL Teachers, 2002 INTASCINTASC
Accomplished FL Teachers World Languages Other than English Standards, 2001 NBPTSNBPTS
National Focus on Assessment
• Assessment plays a key role in focusing language learning and communicating what language educators and the public expect that students will be able to do in their new language;
• Assessment of language learning requires a variety of measures to assist students in their language learning;
National Focus on Assessment
• Users must match language assessments to the purpose for using the instrument, selecting the most appropriate measure.
National Assessment Summit Papers, 2005
• Examples of oral proficiency assessments for Early Language Learners: ELLOPA, SOPA, NOELLA
September 11, 2001September 11, 2001
National Language Conference National Language Conference (2005)(2005)
• Develop language and cultural competency;• Engage federal, state, and local government in
solutions;• Integrate language training across career fields;• Develop critical language skills;• Strengthen teaching capabilities in foreign
languages and cultures;(Continued)
National Language Conference National Language Conference (2005)(2005)
• Integrate language into education system requirements;
• Develop and provide instructional materials and technological tools.
Education for Global LeadershipEducation for Global Leadership
The Importance of International Studies and Foreign Language Education for U.S. Economic and
National Security
Policy Statement
Committee for Economic Development, 2006
Education for Global LeadershipEducation for Global Leadership
Recommendations:• International content should be taught across
the curriculum at all levels of learning, to expand American students’ knowledge of other countries and cultures;
• Expand the training pipeline at every level of education to address the paucity of Americans fluent in foreign languages, especially critical, less-commonly taught languages.
National Security Language Initiative (2006)
Collaborative Effort:
•Secretary of State •Secretary of Education•Secretary of Defense•Director of National Intelligence
$114 million in 2007 budget
National Security Language Initiative (2006)
Goals:
•Expand the number of Americans mastering critical need languages (e.g., Arabic, Chinese, Russian, Hindi, Farsi, and others); •Increase advanced-level speakers of languages, with an emphasis on critical languages through K-16 language study pipelines;•Increase the number of teachers of critical language and the resources for them.
K-16 FlagshipsK-16 Flagships
• NSEP funded
• Goal:– Graduate students with superior-level
proficiency in critical languages who will become global professionals
– Form partnerships with universities and school systems to develop K-16 pipeline programs in Chinese and Arabic.
STARTALK
• NSLI funded multi-year initiative
• Goal: – Expand critical language education by funding
new and existing K-16 programs; – Provide incentives and rewards for foreign
language learning and use in the work force.
World Class EducationWorld Class Education
To succeed in this new global era, we need not only to increase the number of high school graduates and improve the rigor of our math and science curriculum, but also to ensure that our graduates are globally competent.
http://asiasociety.org
World Class EducationWorld Class Education
• Knowledge of other world regions, cultures, economies, and global issues;
• Skills to communicate in languages other than English, to work in cross-cultural teams, and to assess information from different sources around the world; and
• Values of respect for other cultures.
Putting the World into World-Class Education: A National Imperative
and a State and Local Responsibility
Signatories• Asia Society• Alliance for Excellent Education• Committee for Economic Development• Council of Chief State School Officers• National Association of Secondary Schools Principal• National Education Association• National Middle School Association
Why Start Early?
Language Learning Language Learning CapabilityCapability
• Young children appear to learn to speak a new language more easily than adults;
• A child’s language learning advantage is greatest in the area of pronunciation.
AERA Research Points. 2006. Vol. 4, 1
Cognitive Benefits
• Sixth grade students in a non-intensive program outperform a control group in metacognitive processing in the highest metacognitive processing in the highest levels of cognitive processing in levels of cognitive processing in Bloom’s taxonomyBloom’s taxonomy.
Foster & Reeves, 1989.
Cognitive Benefits
• Immersion students demonstrate greater cognitive flexibility greater cognitive flexibility than students in control group
Bruck, Lambert, & Tucker, 1974
• 2nd grade immersion students demonstrate significantly greater growth significantly greater growth in nonverbal problem-solving ability in nonverbal problem-solving ability than control group Bamford, 1991
Academic AchievementAcademic Achievement
• 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade students in a non-intensive language program had significantly higher academic significantly higher academic achievement, especially in English achievement, especially in English language arts,language arts, than control students.
Rafferty, 1986
Academic AchievementAcademic Achievement
• K and 1st grade students in an immersion program performed as well or better than performed as well or better than English-only peers on tests of English-only peers on tests of achievement in Englishachievement in English
Swain, 1981, 1984
• 3rd grade students in a non-intensive program had significant gains in math significant gains in math and languageand language.
Armstrong & Rogers, 1997
Academic AchievementAcademic Achievement
• Immersion students consistently demonstrated comparable or better comparable or better performance in subject matter content performance in subject matter content than students in English-only programs.
Genesee, 1987; Swain, 1984
Attitude
• 14-year-olds are less receptive to learning about people from other cultures than 10-year-olds.
• Younger children are more open and friendly toward people they view as different from themselves.
Lambert & Klineberg, 1967
Attitude
• Significant findings from comparing:
– Schools with a non-intensive Chinese kindergarten program and
– Schools with no foreign language program in kindergarten…
Attitude• Kindergarten students
– Like learning Chinese and – Believe that learning to speak Chinese is
important.• Parents/Guardians
– Believe that it is important for their child to speak, read, and write Chinese fluently.
Rosenbusch, Navarro-Villarroel, Zhang, Kaptain, & Shelley, 2009
Why Teach Chinese in Early Elementary School?
Chinese is the most widely spoken first language in the world;
China is:– Politically important in the Asia-Pacific region;– An immense market for U.S. goods and services;– One of the most enduring world civilizations.
Creating a Chinese Language Program in Your School, Asia Society
Questions
and
Discussion
What?
Program Models for
Early Language Learning
Overview and Case Studies
What Matters Most?
• Time allotted for the program/classes
• Intensity of program and instruction
• Continuity of the program
• Teacher effectiveness
Time + Intensity of Instruction => (Potential) Rate of
Language Acquisition and Learning
Time = number of minutes hours years spent learning and acquiring language
Intensity of Instruction =
a.Frequency and Duration of Classes
b.Time on Task during instruction
c.Opportunities for interaction
d.Substance, Relevance, and Challenge of language experience (Cognitively Engaging, Intrinsically Interesting, Culturally Connected)
Time + Intensity of Instruction => (Potential) Rate of
Language Acquisition and Learning
PLUS
Uninterrupted study of the same language across grade levels and
institutions
Continuity:
Teachers who are:
Teacher Effectiveness:
• well-prepared• enthusiastic and dedicated • knowledgeable about students• knowledgeable about language and culture • knowledgeable about best practices in
world language education.
What are the goals of our programs?
SuperiorCan support opinion, hypothesize, discuss
topics concretely and abstractly, and handlea linguistically unfamiliar situation
Proficiency Inverted Pyramid
LOW
LOW
LOW
MID
MID
MID
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
NoviceCan communicate
minimally withformulaic and rote
utterances, listsand phrases
IntermediateCan create with
language, ask and answer simple
questions on familiar topics, and handle a
simple situation or transaction
AdvancedCan narrate and
describe in all major time frames
and handle a situation with a
complication
Novice
Advanced
Intermediate
Survive and cope in the country
Limited work ability
Satisfy most work requirements
Visual Representation of Anticipated Performance OutcomesAs Described in the
ACTFL Performance Guidelines for K-12 Learners
In mt ee dr i- a t e
Intermediate
N o v i c e
Advanced
Advanced
K-4 K-8 K-12 7-125-125-8 9-10 9-12
Pre
Advanced
N o v i c e
Descriptors are based on information gathered from foreign language professionalsrepresenting a variety of program models and articulation sequences.
Descriptors are appropriate for languages most commonly taught in the U. S.
Descriptors assume a sustained sequence of Standards-based, performance-outcomelanguage instruction. © ACTFL 1998
From Foreign Language Annals 31:4 (Winter 1998), p. 484
ACTFL Performance Guidelines for K-12
Learners
Adapted from Languages and Children: Making the Match, 4th Edition, 2010
Language, Culture, and Curriculum Content are essential elements of every curriculum model.
The focus changes as time and intensity increase across the continuum.
Minimum90-120 min.
Weekly
MaximumFull Day
Full Immersion
Intensity and Time
Content Focus
ContentContent
LanguageCulture
Language Focus
LanguageLanguage
Conte
ntCulture
Continuum of Intensity and Focus for Early Language Programs
Leading to ProficiencyImmersion:
50-100%/dayContent in TL
Adapted from Languages and Children: Making the Match, 4th Edition, 2010
Minimum90-120 min.
Weekly
MaximumFull Day
Full Immersion
Intensity and Time
Content Focus
ContentContent
LanguageCulture
Language Focus
LanguageLanguage
Conte
ntCulture
Less thanMinimum
Programs with less intensity:• less than 30-40 minutes daily, and/or • less than three times per week • may not be able to meet the performance goals of the Standards for
Chinese Language Learning and K-12 Performance Guidelines.
Continuum of Intensity and Focus for Early Language Programs
Leading to ProficiencyImmersion:
50-100%/dayContent in TLExploratory
will
Private
From the Center for Applied Linguistics, National K-12 Foreign Language Survey (2009). Draft data.
Immersion 2%
56%
EXPLORATORY42%
Immersion13%
39%
48%
Public
EXPLORATORYLANGUAGEFOCUS
LANGUAGEFOCUS
(FLES)(FLES)
Program Types Offered by Elementary Schools With Language Programs (Private, Public) (2008)
LESS than
minimum LESS than
minimum
What Matters Most?
Time allotted for the program/classes
Intensity of program and instruction
Continuity of the program
Teacher effectiveness
Perspectives from a Chinese Immersion
Program: Yinghua Academy By
Betsy Lueth, DirectorDr. Luyi Lien, Academic Director
April 30, 2009National Chinese Conference, Chicago, IL
History of Yinghua Academy
- Opened in 2006 with 76 students in K to 3rd grade - in 2007-2008 school year, we doubled our student sizes - in 2008-2009 school year, we have 239 students- in 2009-2010 school year, we have waiting list with every grade and will move to a bigger building
Yinghua Academy: Early Total Immersion Program
- 100% of Chinese instructional time in K & Grade 1- 90% of Chinese instructional time in Grade 2 - 80% of Chinese instructional time in Grade 3- 70 % of Chinese instructional time in Grade 4 - 60% of Chinese instructional time in Grade 5
- Provide special classes (PE class, art class, and music class) also in Chinese
Perspectives from a Chinese Immersion Programs:
Challenge 1Community and Parents
FAQ’s1. Why immersion? Why Chinese?
2. Where do you get your teachers?
3. Is it o.k. for any student? What if they are special ed.?
4. How can I help with homework if I don’t speak Chinese?
5. How will they learn English – math-science? How will they do on state tests?
Perspectives from a Chinese Immersion Programs:
Challenge 2Curriculum and Instruction
FAQ’s1.What text book do you use?
2.Do you use simplified or full-form characters?
3.When do you teach pinyin?
4.How do you teach content?
5.Are students taught in the “Chinese” way or “American” way?
Perspectives from a Chinese Immersion Programs:
Challenge 3Immersion Teachers (Language and Content
Combined)Recruit, Retain, and Develop
FAQ’s1.Where do you find your teachers?
2.How do you get your teachers licensed?
3.How do you keep your teachers?
4.How do you develop your teachers?
5.How do you evaluate your teachers?
Perspectives from a Chinese Immersion Programs:
Challenge 4Daily Teaching Challenges
“The full-service administrator perspective”
1.How do we support teacher’s in the classroom?
2.How do we support parent communication?
3.How do we support teacher’s personal life?
4.How do we support school law understanding?
5.How do you open the door to cultural understanding and communication with staff?
Perspectives from a Chinese Immersion Programs:An example of content teaching and the integration of culture
An example of “The Mouse Bride ”
Perspectives from a Chinese Immersion Programs:An example of content teaching and the integration of culture
Content Area with Cultures:Chinese Language Arts: Poems/Rhythm/folk stories/drama and play
From writing characters to learn cultures, e.g., marriage ideas in Chinese thoughts
Science: mice and other live animals’ habitats and common behaviors
Social Studies:Comparisons of the traditional wedding and modern weddings in China
The custom of Chinese new year
Perspectives from a Chinese Immersion Programs:An example of content teaching and the integration of culture
Perspectives from a Chinese Immersion Program:
Yinghua Academy Questions:
Betsy Lueth, [email protected]
Dr. Luyi Lien, Academic [email protected]
Phone: 651-379-4112
FOREIGN LANGAUGE IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (FLES)
Janna Chiang 蔣芸芳 : NCLC : April / May 2009
• Only one school (2005)
• FLAP grant in 2006
• Program expanded due to funding
• 6 instructors
• 2 Certified teachers
• Model : 3 times a week : 30 mins
• K – 2nd Grade – 40 mins, once a week
• Pre-School– 20 mins, once a week
• 3rd – 5th – Chinese club– 30 mins, twice a week
Connecting Cultures
Real Life Connections
QuickTime™ and ampeg4 decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Classroom activities
Assessment strategies
QuickTime™ and ampeg4 decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
: Grade 1: Grade 1
QuickTime™ and ampeg4 decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
• Expand the program
• Higher frequency
• Additional teachers
• Core-content collaboration
Next move ?
“Planning for Success: Pitfalls in the Planning of Early Foreign Language
Programs”
• Scheduling the foreign language too infrequentlytoo infrequently and/or in class sessions that are too shorttoo short.
“…accomplishment of such content standards required students to be enrolled in elementary programs that meet from 3-5 days per week for no less than 30-40 minutes per class.
3-5 days per week30-40 minutes per
class
““Remember, these are samples--not supper!”Remember, these are samples--not supper!”
“Planning for Success: Pitfalls in the Planning of Early Foreign Language
Programs”
• Planning schedules and workloads that lead to teacher burnout.
Many Additional Responsibilities of a FLES Teacher:
• interacting with numerous classroom teachers
• developing curriculum and materials• communicating with parents and community
• building public relations
Many Additional Responsibilities of an Immersion Teacher:
• responsibility for content areas and language development
• developing curriculum and materials• communicating with parents and community
• building public relations
“Planning for Success: Pitfalls in the Planning of Early Foreign Language
Programs”
• Launching an early language program without sufficient planning--not enough time
--not enough involvement of the rest of the school community
“Planning for Success: Pitfalls in the Planning of Early Foreign Language
Programs”
• Treating foreign languages differently from other academic subjects.
“Planning for Success: Pitfalls in the Planning of Early Foreign Language
Programs”
• Implementing an entire new program in every grade level at the same time.
1K
23
4 56
“Planning for Success: Pitfalls in the Planning of Early Foreign Language
Programs”
• Leaving critical articulation issues to be dealt with later.
“Planning for Success: Pitfalls in the Planning of Early Foreign Language
Programs”
• Planning and scheduling the foreign language curriculum in
isolation from the general curriculum.
“Planning for Success: Pitfalls in the Planning of Early Foreign Language
Programs”
• Relying on English for communication in the foreign language classroom.
What is this in Chinese?
“Planning for Success: Pitfalls in the Planning of Early Foreign Language
Programs”
• Making a language choice based on popularity, without attention to other important factors.
“Planning for Success: Pitfalls in the Planning of Early Foreign Language
Programs”
• Ignoring the needs of students who enter the program in later grades.
“Planning for Success: Pitfalls in the Planning of Early Foreign Language
Programs”
• Hiring teachers for the program who do not have both language and teaching skills.
Building an Action Plan
Defining a Planning Committee and a Timeline
Identifying the Chinese Teacher
Defining/Developing the Curriculum
Defining Instructional Strategies
Selecting Teaching Materials
Assessing Students
Integrating the Program into the Wider School
Context
Evaluating the Program
Sustaining the Quality and Longevity of the Program
What are the first steps in YOUR Action Plan?
Asking the Right Questions:Crafting a Plan for an
Elementary School Chinese Program
Marcia Rosenbusch • Carol Ann Dahlberg
Betsy Lueth • Luyi Lien • Janna Chiang
NCLC Chicago, 2009