Robert Naeslund: The Human Brain Project

The history of Cybernetics is the history of the human

brain project. It was developed as a collaboration

between the Military Research Agency and major

hospitals in the world. Other terms are man-machine-

interaction and bio-telemetry.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ei3zla5hS9o

Cartoon Man: But tell me what the lecture is about.

Cartoon Woman: The modern Dr. Frankenstein! Brain

chips, medical abuse, so called mind control and

behavior manipulation!

From a lecture in Stockholm/Sweden, by Robert

Naeslund, 2011 about the technology of cybernetics,

introduced by the U.S. professor Norbert Weiner 1948

– also called for brain-computer-interaction – mind

control or man-machine interference.

From the 1940s electrodes were implanted in the

brains of unwitting hospital patients during surgery. In

the 1960s mini-transmitters that could easily be

implanted were developed and nowadays brain chips are

injected at hospitals internationally.

Welcome to an evening about brain control. This

subject that has received too little attention and that

has often been related to conspiracy theories and even

science fiction. But that in reality has been a state

project during the last 60 years, developed behind the

so-called “walls of power” the secrecy of military

research.

My name is Robert Naeslund and I am going to give an

explanation of the subject that the American senator

John Glenn had as his main activity during the last 3

years as a politician and that he, in his last speech in

the Senate in 1997 described as one of the most

important questions of our times. The technology that

uses remote control to directly connect to the human

brain emerged as super computers were developed in

the 1940s.

From the beginning this technology used implants in the

human brain –then electrodes, two-way communication

systems where the emitted frequencies could be

programmed with data for influence while the

returning signal sent biological information that the

super computer could compile and analyze.

The very first articles about this technology were

published in the New York Times in December 1948

when the American professor Norbert Weiner

published the book “Cybernetics” coining at the same

time the “cyber” concept.

It can be interesting to know where this work came

from. The technology came to be known as bio-medical

telemetry. That is the medical name for it. Telemetry

means measuring at a distance. Other terms were bio-

cybernetics, brain-computer-technology or man-

system-interaction, which is the Swedish State’s name

for this technology.

The first experiments—and this is something that will

challenge our understanding about medical ethics in

particular but also doctor’s functions—but there is

very strong documentation about this.

The first experiments with this technology in Sweden

that we can document took place at Karolinska Hospital

in Stockholm in 1946. Electrodes were implanted in

people’s brains—on the same premises as today—

without people’s knowledge, and these people were

thereafter used in medical experimentation with the

new technology.

Already in the 1950s—half a century ago this extensive

research program was organized behind the Defense

Research that was at that time called FOA, and that

functioned as knowledge bank, innovator, made

evaluations, trained doctors, and professors to develop

the project.

The Military Research has by now changed its name to

FOI and states in its annual report of 2011 that their

goal is to control man’s cognitive functions during the

individual’s whole lifetime. Cognition is about thought

and reason.

All facts which are presented about Sweden are as well

valid for the U.S. or any European nation. This techno-

political violent project goes on globally and Senator

John Glenn, Congressman Kucinich, the New York Times

and many professors have all protested against the

rape of the brain.

It’s with the super computers that they were able to

develop the big brain project that this lecture will be

about. Two years later, 1953, April 3rd, the New York

Times had an article with the title “Scientists Use

Electrodes in the Brain” and from it we can understand

that already at that time, 1953, one could transfer

both memory, thoughts, and sensory functions by

remote control.

I’ll quote a few lines from it: “Patient’s brains are wired

for sound with hair-like electrodes in a new technique

reported at the Mayo Clinic today. The scientists said

that through the depth recording and electrical

stimulation methods, new fields of investigation had

been opened into basic function of the human brain,

like memory, thought, action, sight and smell.” And this

was an article published April 3rd, 1953, but still today,

this is nothing that anyone talks about.

Well, at least not in the mass media or the popular

science magazines. Professor John Lilly mentioned in

his memoirs the book with the title The Scientist

published in 1978 that he 1953—again, this is

completely mind blowing because it happened such a

long time ago—58 years ago—he was called to a meeting

with the director for the US Mental Health Institute

that asked him to have his research with dolphins and

chimps—with electrodes in their brains—behind the

CIA’s secrecy. But he refused. And the answer that

he gave to the General Director was also published in

his memoirs telling us very much about how this type of

technology was developed and how far the development

had already gone by 1953.

“Dr. Remond that uses our technology in Paris shows

that this method of stimulation of the brain, can be

applied to humans without the help of a neurosurgeon.

He does it at his clinic. This means that anyone with

the right tools can do this to a person, in secret,

without any sign that electrodes have been used on the

person.

If this technology comes into the hands of a secret

agency, they can have a total control over a person and

change his beliefs extremely quickly.” That’s how far

this technology was developed already in 1953. CIA

had begun its collaboration with surgeons abroad, in

this case Paris, who implanted their electrodes

imperceptibly, secretly in patients’ brains.

The magazine Science, November 30, 1956 their first

extensive article regarding the brain subject under the

heading “Some Issues Concerning the Control of Human

Behavior”. Professor Carl R Rogers called the people

under these conditions the slaves of those who

directed their behavior.

Professor Carl Rogers, Science, November 30, 1956: “I

believe the prediction and control of behavior may be

misused. It also means that the great majority are

only the slaves. We can choose to use our knowledge to

enslave humans in ways we never dreamed of, in such a

way that they never become aware of the loss of their

personalities.”

And this was something that was published in the

magazine Science. He also added: “In such a case, we

can only look back on the concept of human freedom,

and the right to choose, as being an historical curiosity

that once existed, as a cultural accident, as a set of

values in a pre-technological civilization.”

Yes, these are indeed scary words. They represent

something that is in fact much more detestable than

what old traditional dictatorships represent and that

the project was developed because of government

decisions. Well, it’s a horror story.

This is something that the Swedish Defense

researcher and scientist P.M. Persson talked about in

an article in the FOA-magazine 1965 with the title

“Bio-Telemetry”. He wrote: “The word telemetry

comes from the Greek tele meaning far, and metri

meaning measure. In Swedish telemetry would be

called measuring at a distance. Telemetry can be

described as the science of the transmission of data

that is normally not available. The oldest and most

widely used radio system is the FM-FM system. It was

standardized as early as 1950 in the U.S.A. The

substantial portion of biotelemetry comprises data

transmission. This is mainly done by using implanted

transmitters. The technology has evolved very far in

Swedish medical research.”

What in fact was developed far back in the medical

research was the abuse of patients, in whose brains or

heads, transmitters had been implanted. And this was

something that, at that time, was done largely during

surgeries, when patients were anesthetized.

Dr. Jose Delgado, mentioned earlier in the New York

Times article published in 1967, a research report

Man’s Intervention in Intracerebral Functions. He

wrote that electrodes were implanted in patients in all

major hospitals around the world. I’ll quote a few

words from the research report. “Implanted

electrodes in humans are now used in all large hospitals.

The presence of electrodes in the brain is not harmful,

or even unpleasant and patients live a completely

normal life in their homes.

From the experimental point of view, behavioral

research requires individual freedom. In consequence

of this trend, we have begun to affect the brain’s

psychological reactions and scientific studies have

concluded that we can experiment with intracerebral

functions responsible for developing and maintaining

specific behaviors and mental functions.”

Well, this was nothing that the patients themselves—as

they were called—had the slightest idea about; that

they had been implanted and that they were used in

research. In experiments of their brain functions for

a lifetime connected to the systems.

With this technology, one of the most prioritized

research area emerged that had to do with changing

people’s perceptions, ideas and, in general, behavior.

To understand about politician’s attitudes regarding

this matter, I am going to quote a Swedish government

report from 1972. The Prime Minister Olof Palme

appointed Alva Myrdal as chairman of the state

commission “Choosing the Future”. The predicted

future wasn’t what anyone would accept. From the

following few words that I am going to quote, one can

better understand politician’s tactical games in which

human rights and all international conventions that

Sweden had signed to protect their citizens, were

completely mashed.

Alva Myrdal wrote: “Research in the field of brain

function and behavior is primarily aimed at identifying

the nature and extent of those changes that can be

achieved with the different methods. Discussions

about the various methods to influence people, are

leading to the question of the individual’s ability to

protect oneself from undesirable influence, and the

invasion of privacy.

Undoubtedly, the protection of the individual against

the abuse of these and similar methods in today’s

society is inadequate.” In fact, the government did not

want to give us--the people--protection against the

technological intrusions into our brains. This was 40

years ago. They gave their sympathies to power

instead of taking people’s side and felt solidarity with

some small but powerful groups such as the military,

the professors and the researchers. In particular,

these three groups. All of them wanted to develop it

against humanity. And the whole population.

About the same time, the American professor of

astronomy, Carl Sagan, published his book, “The

Dragons of Eden”. In that book he discussed this

technology, and he wrote that people, who accept

electrodes in their brains, have lost any chance of

freedom. I quote from it: “When it comes to

technological nightmares, it is important to realize the

possibility that people can understand it and prevent

government abuse.

The people that allow the government to implant

electrodes in their brains, have lost the battle of

freedom.” A way of understanding it—at least the

beginning of the lost freedom—is to realize that not a

single article has come out in the mass media that has

been able to create a debate about this technology and

its emerging role as a political factor.

The New York Times

The New York Times has been the best newspaper in

the world to challenge the U.S. project of mind control.

During the years 1967 to 1977 they published three

editorials and demanded a public debate. “Push Button

People” 1967—“Brain Wave” 1970—and the last:

“Control CIA, Not Behavior” August 5, 1977.

But there has been one newspaper, one, a single

newspaper in the world that has been better than any

other. It has challenged the greatest power on earth

in this matter and it is the New York Times. Already

from the start in the 1950s, they brought up research

reports and referred to the possibility to—for the

first time in human history—being able to neutralize—

not only mental diseases—but even physical ones. They

had written many articles about this development in

the 1950s. In the 1960s they began stating that the

technology was being misused. And they also published

many leading figure’s warnings about the social danger

of a society under brain—mind—control. During the

1970s the danger had become even greater. And more

and more articles were written about the CIA’s

development of brain systems. During a single summer

in 1977, the New York Times published 30 articles

about the CIA’s brain control systems. The most

important thing that was brought into light was that

this project already had begun in the late 1940s, and

that they had built with this technology, a state within

the state. In 1967, the New York Times had its first

editorial, the first of the three following over the next

10 years. This was published April 10, 1967 under the

title “Push Button People”. And they discussed the

ongoing experiments and warned about the

development of this technology, and it was stated that

it has to come up to a more general debate and to

everyone’s attention. They also mentioned that

probably there were countries in the world that

already had planned to subjugate their populations

using this technique.

I’ll quote a few words from the New York Times

editorial. “It is the possibility of similar control over

human beings that causes concern. Several years ago, a

scientist told a scientific meeting that experiments

with patients seems to support the distasteful

conclusion that motion, emotion and behavior can be

directed by electrical forces and that humans can be

controlled like robots by push buttons. It is indeed a

‘distasteful conclusion’ but it is quite conceivable that

in some countries investigations may be under way into

the possibility of using these techniques to control

human beings. But the mere existence of such a

possibility is disturbing, and certainly merits wider

public discussion and greater attention than it has

received up to now.” Certainly this was the way it was.

Both the U.S. and Sweden were countries that had far

reaching plans to subjugate citizens beyond their

knowledge in brain control systems. 3:

This is an issue where movies give more accurate

information, compared to professors or documentaries.

Here are some pictures from movies regarding what

has gone on for half a century.

(23:53) The Manchurian Candidate “Somebody got

into our heads with big steal-toe boots.”

(24:03) “Implants—that’s what I said.”

(24:11) The Japanese Movie--Paprika “It was an

invention that never should have been created.”

(24:20) “You should know better than anyone what can

happen if it’s misused.”

(24:30) Control Factor—“It’s psychotronic brain

entrainment technology.”

(24:38) “But if you don’t do something you won’t be

able to think for yourself.”

(24:46) “We’ll show these sons of bitches that the

guinea pigs can bite back.”

Some other movies regarding the brain subject: Total

Recall—The Lawnmower Man—Johnny Mnemonic—The

Cell—The Island—Metropia—Extreme Measures—X-

Man.

There are two versions of The Manchurian Candidate—

from the 1960s with Frank Sinatra—and from the

1990s with Meryl Streep and Sydney Poitier.

By this time, surgeons had under two decades

committed their abuses on patients. And this

technology during the whole time been developed

behind the Swedish Defense Research Institute (FOA).

The experiments have during the whole development

been very brutal. A conference was held in 1986,

March 13th, about this issue at the Swedish

Department of Justice.

Swedish Justice Minister Sten Wickbom had invited

some professors, researchers and a few politicians. At

the meeting it was mentioned that this mustn’t reach

the mass media. One professor, Bengt Pernow, said

that researchers from all over the world are coming to

Sweden, to experiment on humans, as they don’t have

the right to do that in their own countries. Because we

here in Sweden, have less protection for our Human

Rights than other nations. And this was mentioned in

clear words at that conference.

Brains can be stolen and raped! The authorities do it!

We tend to believe that we in Sweden live in the best

of all democracies. That’s how it usually sounds in the

mass media anyway. But if you only scratch a little bit

on the surface you discover something very different.

To return to the New York Times, they published their

second editorial September 19th, 1970 under the title

Brainwave. It indicated that Orwell’s vision of the

future had already expired. Something new was around

the corner, something new and much worse. Every

newborn baby—its first experience in this world—would

be to be implanted with a neuro-transmitter and for

their entire lifetime have emotion and cognition

controlled by the state computers.

Some lines from the New York Times editorial August

5, 1977.

CONTROL C.I.A. NOT BEHAVIOR

So we must add repugnant medical experimentation to

the list of horror stories emerging from the C.I.A. It

was no secret that the agency once hunted desperately

for means to control human behavior. One objective

was to program individuals so that they might do the

agencies bidding even to the point of ignoring such

fundamental laws of nature as self-preservation. We

are not sufficiently schooled in ethics to know how this

differs from murder. There is no substitute for also

holding their senior officials ethically and legally

responsible as individuals for all activities. Even at this

late date, the country should be told who sanctioned

such projects, and how.

These are good words coming from the New York

Times. Now 35 years later, we have every reason to

make the same demands in Sweden. What happened

under 60 years of brain experimentation? Which

doctors, professors, what institutions have been

involved in the most anti-democratic project that ever

existed? By what kind of methods has it been possible

to keep it off the media and people’s attention? What

defenses have been set up? What is the role of the

medical corporations? They are involved. What does

the government say? FOI’S super computers must be

turned off! We are all about to become the State’s lab

rats and chip manipulated behavior skulls, and that’s

verified by FOI itself.

U.S. Killed 33,000 Civilian People

With Train tech in South Vietnam in 1970

That was disclosed by the British Professor Malcolm

Varnar in his title “The Data Bank Society” 1970. By

mixing microchips in both medicines, alcohol and

probably Coca-Cola they could scan a large part of the

South Vietnamese over and middle-class. The super

computer revealed 33,000 people as important Viet

Cong sympathizers—and planned to kill them by the

same technology by which they were disclosed. By

changing their biological functions that they died . . .

To give you an idea about the Pentagon’s use of brain

control technology I will quote something which, just as

everything else no one has ever heard of even though it

should have been on the front pages of the mass media.

A few people with insight and courage dared to reveal

the most secret, the military’s use of brain technology

for mass murder. Two British scientists, Professor

Malcolm Varnar and Dr. Michael Stone, published 1970

the book “The Data Bank Society”, which is a strong

protest against the government’s power over people’s

minds. At that time, the U.S. had its war in Vietnam

and they had advanced methods for implanting people.

By mixing up microchips in probably both medicine and

alcohol one could within a few years scan a large part

of South Vietnam’s upper-class and middle-class. The

super computers could thereafter analyze and evaluate

people, assess their opinions and see what they are up

to. To find that there were 33,000 very important

people that were Viet-Cong sympathizers and that they

planned to execute. And it could be done through the

same technology through which their sympathies were

assessed, through the connection to their brains—their

biological functions could be changed to a state that

was lethal. By creating heart attacks, strokes, cancer

or whatever they liked.

The following brief quotation from Professor Malcolm

Varnar says a lot about that: “Hopelessly thwarted in

its attempts to improve information input, the U.S.

Command in Saigon has devoted its most skilled

resources to rendering its information processing

ultra-sophisticated. It has invented what is, in effect,

a computerized ‘extermination machine’ .. . . The High

Command in Saigon is now extending the idea of

computer selections to individuals as well as to

suspected areas. This year, 1970, the program aims to

eliminate 33,000 individual Vietnamese citizens who—it

has been determined by the computer—are Viet Cong

sympathizers.”

This quote also says a lot about being able to—through

the computer brain interaction—manipulate someone’s

biological functions—even to the point where they die.

Of one reason or the other that can’t be

differentiated from normal death causes. The same

sources are also in FOI’s super computer systems and

it is also used to keep the brain systems away from the

mass media and people’s knowledge.

A Swedish General Director, Stina Wahlstrom, wrote in

1989 in the Data Inspections Annual Book that as long

as this continues Sweden cannot be called a democracy.

She wrote about people exploited without their

knowledge or against their will. Of course, these are

strong words that we are not living in a democracy, but

a project like this cannot exist in a democracy.

However, one of the best protests and revelations

from this society’s own authorities was actually stated

a few years ago. March 16th, 2005, the European

Commission’s Ethical Council with the Swedish

professor Goran Hermeren as chairman published the

document Ethical Aspects of ICT Implants in the

Human Body to the EU Commission as a

recommendation on how one should regard this

technology’s future development. It is without doubt

challenging the system and it is the best of all other

explanations and the biggest disclosure made about

this technology. Their 30-page document explains that

implants are injected into people for research and

social control purposes.

ICT stands for Information-Communication-Technology

and includes everything from electrodes to biochips.

The quotes from their document say everything

regarding how this technology nowadays is used, not

only in Sweden, but all Europe, within the European

Union. They are talking about injecting people,

unwittingly, with chips. Well, this has in fact been

going on for 60 years now, but good they mention it.

I quote from their document: “Brain-computer

interface or direct brain control: the technologies

involved above are communications technologies. They

take information from the brain and externalize it.

These are internalizing technologies whose purpose is

to take information from the outside and provide

individual access to it.” They did not talk about any

particular individuals but all of us. It was declared

that it belonged to a transformation of the human

being.

Quote: “Our present society is confronted with the

changes that have to do with the anthropological

essence of what man’s inner nature is.” They did not

mention some specific people or population groups, but

in fact all of us. This is a planned population project

for the manipulation of our innermost nature. Our

right to think for ourselves. They explained that it

was a threat to the democratic society and, of course,

it is so. Not even a Hitler with his old methods could

be a more terrifying threat in today’s societies when

you compare them with the technologies intrusion into

our brains.

They wrote: “EGE makes the evaluation that non-

medical applications of implants are a potential threat

to human dignity and the democratic society. The use

of the remote control to take over people’s will must be

absolutely prohibited.” It is of course not less critical

to go into someone’s brain and change a human being’s

thoughts and will—than it was under Hitler’s and

Stalin’s times—forcing people behind barbed wire in

order to neutralize their thoughts and will power. It

says a lot about our political governance of course.

In addition, you should be aware that many of those

who sit in the parliament also have their brains

incorporated into the defense departments’ super

computer control systems. Of course, they become a

type of puppet for the will of others.

Down here is the Information; what frequencies go into

the brain of Americans when they have been implanted

in hospitals. The table was published in a research

report by Professor Stuart Mackay, “Telemetry is

Coming of Age” 1983.

Biomedical Frequency Allocation in the United States

For Research and Patient Monitoring

Frequency MHz Bandwidth KHz Field

Strength V/m Out of Band Xmitter Reqs

38-41 200 10 at 15 m. 10

uv/M at 3 m.

88-108 200 50 at 15 m. 40

uv/M at 3 m.

174-216 200 150 at 30 m. 15 uv/M at

30 m.

Next quote is about health and our social life that has

largely degenerated since the brain technology had its

impact for a couple of decades ago. Now a neuro

professor, Anders Lasner, at Stockholm Brain

Institute states that approximately 30% of the people

in the EU suffer from brain diseases or behavioral

disorders.

(42:41) Photo graphic of a Campbell’s soup can labeled

Brain Stew with State Chips.

Too much of Brain Stew in the world. That is the

reason for madness, diseases and degeneration. The

EU Commission Ethical Board called it a change in

humanity’s anthropological being.

It increases and it is directly related to this

technology. We all have of course been confronted

with the tragedy that people seem to become stranger

and stranger.

The EU-ethical group provided us with an explanation

of the reasons: “It should be stressed that there are

no reliable scientific investigations concerning the long-

term health aspect of implants in the human body. The

unrestricted freedom of some may endanger the health

and safety for others. As in other areas, the freedom

to use implants in one’s own body, i.e., the principle of

freedom itself might collide with potential negative

social effects.”

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSIONS ETHICAL BOARD

WROTE:

Brain-computer-interface (BCI) or direct brain control

are communication technologies: they take information

from the brain and they externalize it. Contemporary

society is confronted with changes that have to do with

the anthropological essence of individuals . . . To what

extent might this technology be misused by the

military? . . . . The Member States and their ethics

councils have a responsibility to create conditions for

education and constructive, well-informed debates in

this area.

Under the section: Human Dignity, Integrity and

Autonomy the EGE-Group brought up a number of

questions, not because they wondered about the

answers, but probably because they were best

presented as questions. “How far can such implants be

a threat to human autonomy, particularly when they are

implanted in our brains?” “How far can such implants

have irreversible impacts in the human body and/or in

the human psyche?” “How will they influence memory?”

“Does a human being cease to be such a being in cases

where some parts of his or her body—particularly the

brain—are substituted and/or supplemented by ICT

implants?

How far can ICT implants give an individual, or a group,

specific capabilities that could become a threat to

society? How far should we be subject to the control

of such devices or by other people using these

devices?”

From this quote, when the EU Commission’s Ethical

Board talks about these implants in our own brains, we

can understand the extensive use of this project. It

has, in fact, throughout the history of mankind it has

never existed anything more totalitarian. There has

never been anything more anti-democratic. A

dictatorship can never be greater than when citizens’

brains are linked to computer control.

The state has become a cannibal, a rapist who is eating

its citizens. Transforming us into biological

manipulated components. But the EU Commission did

not support their recommendation on the need to stop

the ongoing trend of mind control. They instead

accepted the continuation of this project, and, of

course, that day when techno-political development will

create debates in the mass media, it will have serious

consequences.

(48:00) GOD SAVE THE BRAIN (X-ray of a brain)

They ended the document, by urging that this

development must become general knowledge.

Quote: “The Member States and their national ethics

councils have a responsibility to create conditions for

education and constructive, well-informed debates in

this area.” Of course it is good if everybody joins this

challenge. But these councils have now had 6 years to

their inability—no debate has arisen. Not even a single

word has been said yet. But this is, of course, also

everyone’s responsibility. All of us must participate to

ensure that this issue reaches the mass media. This is

one of humanity’s crossroads. One can almost say that

nothing ever happened in the history of mankind. That

this is the very first time that something is occurring.

In other words, before this, we’ve always been our own

biological creations. Sure, we have been indoctrinated

to believe or not in certain things, but we have

nevertheless always had our own biology, mentality and

our own resources intact.

This is an issue, almost completely unknown, but at the

same time, without doubt, humanity’s most important.

And that was exactly what Senator John Glenn said in

his speech in 1997 when he left the Senate.

The Swedish Defense and Research Institution wrote

in its annual report 2011: FOI develops systems with

emphasis on the interaction between people and

technology. The goal is that systems are designed at

human cognitive potential, i.e., the ability to perceive,

understand, and sorting information, can be utilized for

maximum system effect during people’s lifetime . . . .

Everybody must, of course, join this cause!!! The media

has, of course, a responsibility to address this issue!

Of course, all human rights organizations . . .

Greenpeace, Attack, Amnesty . . .And, of course, all

political parties that see people’s well-being as above

state power must participate in order to bring this

subject up for debate, and by that, making change

possible.

I will end these dark visions with some positive

thoughts about this technology. The man who coined

the term Information Society, the Japanese Professor

Yoneji Masuda published his book “The Information

Society” in 1980. In that book he brought up the dark

and the light applications of this technology and he

wrote: “If information systems were to be completely

dominated by despotic state organization, the

information society would the ultimate controlled

society, in which the abuse would by far exceed the

abuse of human rights under dictatorships but if the

people took over the systems, we could live free,

healthy, active, creative lives up to an average of 90 or

more. This technology has as many positive as negative

applications.

Thank you.

To live with freedom or with brain chips. That’s the

questions.

For anyone who would like to contact me:

braintexts@hotmail.com

Robert Naeslund