Rights Approach Presentation prepared by Anna Peachy, Kelsey Rickerman, and Angie Kelly LP: Ethical...
-
Upload
calvin-tate -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Rights Approach Presentation prepared by Anna Peachy, Kelsey Rickerman, and Angie Kelly LP: Ethical...
Rights Approach
Presentation prepared by Anna Peachy, Kelsey Rickerman, and Angie Kelly
LP: Ethical Theory Presentation
Section: Tuesday, April 1st 2008 @ 1:30 pm
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)
Kantian Ethics: Rights Approach
Kantian Ethics: Rights Approach
Each human being has dignity and is worthy of respect.
Human dignity gives rise to fundamental moral rights.
Rights
Rights are legitimate claims persons
have on others and society
*Two kinds
~Protects human freedom
~Minimum level of well being
Categorical Imperative
A Rule For Testing Rules
StepsConsider the maximGeneralize the principle
Perform test onePerform test two, if necessary
Example OneUsing test one
Maxim: I may make a false promise… Generalized: Anyone may make a false
promise…
~This is self-contradictory because:
If anyone may make a …Result: I may not act on that maxim. The maxim fails Test One.
Example TwoUsing test one and two
Maxim: I may refuse to help another…Generalized: Anyone may refuse to
help…
~Can it be conceived? Yes.
~Could you will to be universal law?Result: You cannot act on the "Bad
Samaritan" maxim.
Good Will Kant says that only one (kind of)
thing is inherently good, and that is the good will.
Good WillWe control will behind action
Morally good action vs. morally right action.
“Without qualification”
Moral worth depends on motive
The Duality of the Human The Duality of the Human SituationSituation
~Humans vs. Animals~Humans vs. Animals~Morality~Morality
Criticisms
~Kant’s approach gives
little aid for complex situations
Criticism
~Kant dismisses emotions such as pity and compassion as
irrelevant to morality
Criticism
~Kant’s approach doesn’t take the consequences of actions seriously enough
Current Ethical Dilemma
Euthenasia: Does the intent to relieve suffering outweigh the responsibility to preserve life?
*Dr. Kevorkian
Conclusion
After two hundred years, Kant remains After two hundred years, Kant remains an absolutely central figure in the Rights an absolutely central figure in the Rights Approach, one from whom we can learn Approach, one from whom we can learn much even when we disagree with himmuch even when we disagree with him..
Review QuestionsReview Questions
1.1. What do you consider the weakness of What do you consider the weakness of Kant’s Rights Approach?Kant’s Rights Approach?
2.2. What do you consider the strengths of What do you consider the strengths of Kant’s Rights Approach?Kant’s Rights Approach?
3.3. Do you see yourself using the Rights Do you see yourself using the Rights Approach in your life?Approach in your life?