Right to Food in India
-
Upload
naveen-bhartiya -
Category
News & Politics
-
view
687 -
download
3
description
Transcript of Right to Food in India
The Right to Food in India
The Food Security Scenario in South Asia
Country Food
Production Food Exports Food Imports Food Balance
Bangladesh 26,924 1.6 2,827 -4,601
India 1,74,655 9,490 56 23,826
Nepal 5,839 11 39 57
Pakistan 24,936 2,966 288 3,818
Sri Lanka 1,938 9.8 1,307 252
Source: FAO, 2004. Figures in thousand metric tones for 2002
3
Changes in Hunger Index 1996 2011 1996 2011
China 9.1 5.5 Uganda 20.4 16.7
Thailand 11.9 8.1 Zimbabwe 22.3 17.7
Vietnam 21.4 11.2 Malawi 27.1 18.2
Mongolia 17.7 11.4 Kenya 20.3 18.6
Indonesia 15.5 12.2 Nepal 24.6 19.9
SriLanka 17.8 14 Pakistan 22 20.7
Nigeria 21.2 15.5 Sudan 24.7 21.5
Myanmar 25.4 16.3 India 22.9 23.7
Bangladesh 36.3 24.5
India’s Growth Story 1951-2012
5
2
4
6
8
10
195
1-5
2
195
7-5
8
196
3-6
4
196
9-7
0
197
5-7
6
198
1-8
2
198
7-8
8
199
3-9
4
199
9-0
0
200
5-0
6
2011-1
2
Population, GDP and Foodgrain Production
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1951 1961 1971 1981 1991 2001 2006
Population
GDP
FoodgrainProduction
Worrying issues• News of starvation deaths & farmers’ suicides from
many states• Stagnant agricultural production, and falling food
availability• Unemployment has increased from 4 to 8% in ten
years• Regional disparities are increasing • IMR stagnating around 60 per 1000, it is 46 in
Bangladesh• Immunisation coverage fell from 60 to 40% in 5 yrs• More than 50% women are anemic• 46% children are malnourished • Declining child sex ratio during 1991-2001 • There is no will to improve administration in poor
states
Per capita annual foodgrain production (kg)
150
160
170
180
190
200
210
2201990-91
1993-94
1996-97
1999-00
2002-03
2005-06
2008-09
2011-12
99
Per capita daily availability (grams)
400
425
450
475
5001974
1977
1980
1983
1986
1989
1992
1995
1998
2001
2004
2007
2010
Per Capita Cereal Consumption for various deciles (Rural India, 2004-2005; kg/month)
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
0-5
5-10
10-20
20-30
30-40
40-50
50-60
60-70
70-80
80-90
90-95
95-100
11
Buffer Stocks
11
Buffer norms & actual stocks
010203040506070801.10.2007
1.7.2008
1.4.2009
1.01.2010
1.10.2010
1.07.2011
1.04.2012
BUFFER NORMACTUAL STOCK
Foodgrain wholesale price index (1993-94=100)
150
200
250
300
350
400
4501999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
1414
Per capita Rural monthly consumption in kg (2002)
India Vietnam
Foodgrains 13 20.5
Dairy 3.9 0.2
Meat/poultry 1.5 3.4
Fruit/vegetables 9.5 5.8
eating out/sugar/oil 1.8 5.8
Total 29.7 35.7
1515
Per Capita Consumption during 2004-06 (kg/year)
India China US World
All cereals 175.1 287.9 953 316
Meat 5.3 56.8 126.6 40.2
Milk 84.5 22.7 Na 97.8
Eggs 1.8 21.6 15.2 9.7
There should be no food insecurity in India
Both GDP and foodgrain production have risen faster than the growth in population over the last 50 years
And yet chronic hunger and starvation persist in large
sections of the population. There has been a declining calorie consumption especially in the bottom 30% of the population.
India has the largest food schemes in the World
• Entitlement Feeding Programmes– ICDS (All Children under six, Pregnant and lactating mother)– MDMS (All Primary School children)
• Food Subsidy Programmes– Targeted Public Distribution System (35 kgs/ month of subsidised food grains – Annapurna (10 kgs of free food grain for destitute poor)
• Employment Programmes– National Rural Employment Scheme (100 days of employment at minimum
wages)
• Social Safety Net Programmes– National Old Age Pension Scheme (Monthly pension to BPL)– National Family Benefit Scheme (Compensation in case of death of bread winner
to BPL families)
Underlying causes of hunger in India
• Falling per capita crop, especially food production in the last 10 years.
• Increasing share of surplus states and large farmers in food production, resulting in artificial surplus that is exported, thus further reducing availability of foodgrains.
• Increasing inequality, with only marginal increase in the per capita expenditure of the bottom 30%. From their meager income the poor are forced to spend more on medical care, education, transport, fuel, and light, thus reducing the share of their expenditure on food.
Underlying causes (contd.)• Low access of the poor to expensive foods, such
as pulses, vegetables, oil, fruits, and meat products which provide essential proteins, fats, and micro-nutrients. This leads to under-development of human body and mind, affecting the ability of individuals to work productively, and resist disease
• Major food related programmes, such as PDS and ICDS are plagued by corruption, leakages, errors in selection, procedural delays, poor allocations and little accountability. They also tend to discriminate against and exclude those who need them most, such as urban poor migrants, street and slum residents, and dispersed hamlets.
20
Production, Procurement & Offtake of Foodgrains (in million Tonnes)
1997-98 2002-03 2007-08 2011-12
Food Subsidy in billion Rupees
79 240 313 602
Production of foodgrains
192 175 231 253
Procurement of foodgrains
23.6 40.3 39.6 60.1
Distribution through FPS
17 20.1 33.5 51
Disposal though welfare schemes
2.1 11.4 3.9 4.1
21
Planning Commission’s evaluation TPDS (2003)
• 58 per cent of subsidized food grains does not reach the BPL families, 22% reaches APL and 36% sold in black
• High cost of handling, for one rupee transfer to the poor, the Gol spends Rs.3.65
• Targeting errors, ghost cards and non-BPL households• Only 57% of the poor households have ration cards• FPSs are not viable, they remain in business through
leakages • Homeless often do not have ration cards
No assessment of PDS in the last nine years
Justice Wadhwa Observations 2009
• Rajasthan - Unsatisfactory, many irregularities, irregular lifting of grain, no lifting and bulk lifting, PDS in the state has collapsed.
• Jharkhand - The distribution mechanism has continued in the hands of the most corrupt and inefficient Bihar State Food and Supply Corporation (BSFC). If the FPS owners do not pay Rs. 10 per bag to the godown manager, he gives rotten grains to FPS.
• Bihar - Diversion and black-marketing of food grains by FPS dealers. Strong nexus between officials of the department and FPS dealers. Ghost and bogus ration cards is a major problem in the state
• Orissa - Private storage agents are the major source of diversion in the State of Orissa as there is virtually no control or checking on their activities. The appointment of storage agent was susceptible to high political influence.
• Gujarat - FPS owners in the state bribe the officials every month. Ghost and bogus ration cards is a major problem in the state.
Factors behind Chhattisgarh’s success
• Political will
• Private dealers replaced by panchayats
• 70% families covered at Rs 2/1 per kg of rice
• Huge investment from state revenues
• Rice surplus state
• 500 people put behind the bars
• Toll free number for grievance redressal
• Constant monitoring
People put pressure when the scheme is credible23
24
Distribution of cardholders among poor and non-poor
% poor with no ration card
% poor with BPL/AAY cards
% BPL/AAY cards with non-poor
HP 3.3 39.9 51.1
Maharashra 19.2 22.9 48.7
Kerala 10.0 48.4 74.8
Haryana 4.4 32.4 74.8
Jharkhand 22.1 31.9 42.4
Orissa 29.3 54.8 38.1
Chhattisgarh 24.1 47.9 47
MP 30 41.9 46.2
All India 19.1 36 59.8
President’s Address June 2009
• Food Security for all
• Broader systemic reform of PDS
In addition, Congress Party’s election manifesto promised subsidized community kitchens for homeless & migrants in cities
with Central Government support
28
NAC decisions• Cover 90% rural and 50% urban population• 46% rural & 28% urban to get 7 kg per unit of
rice/wheat/ millets at Rs 3/2/1 per kg• 44% rural & 22% urban to get 7 kg per unit at
50% of the current Minimum Support Price• Legal entitlements for child and maternal
nutrition, mid-day meals for school children, as well as community kitchens and programmes for feeding destitute and vulnerable groupsThese recommendations can be implemented through an administrative order without waiting
for the Food Bill to be passed by Parliament28
29
Food Security Act - Issues • Universal vs targeted• 25 kg per household, or 35 kg?• At what price?• Should procurement be increased, even when per capita
production does not increase?• Existing APL allocations to TN, AP, Kerala, northeast?• Exports• Introduction of UID and smart cards• Improving accountability
Imperatives for legislating the Right to Food
• Moral Imperative
(High growth and yet hunger and malnutrition persist alongside poor social indicators)
• Political Imperative
(Legislature vs.Judiciary)
• “Electoral” imperative
(Anti-incumbency in the context of the 2009 General and State Elections)
NFSB: What is in it that already existed
• Universal School Meals – Cooked meals provided across the country for primary and
upper primary school students as a result of Supreme Court orders
• Universal access to Integrated Child Development Services– Supplementary nutrition for children in the age group of 6
months to 6 years, pregnant and lactating women, based on SC orders
– SC orders also includes universalisation of other health and nutrition services, the NFSB does not cover these
• Subsidized Food grains through the Public Distribution System
NFSB: What’s new?
• Maternity Entitlements• Grievance Redressal Mechanism• PDS Reforms• Nutri-millets as part of the PDS • Women as entitlement holders
NFSB: What’s missing• Provisions for adolescent girls• Community kitchens in urban areas• Meals for persons living with starvation• One free meal as part of the destitute feeding programme• Entitlements for migrant workers• Pretty much all crucial determinants for addressing
malnutrition (drinking water, sanitation)• Quality and nutrition standards for school mid day meals,
supplementary nutrition etc.• Social Security Pensions (aged, single women, persons with
disabilities)• Provision for management of children with severe acute
malnutrition • Agrarian reforms and revival of agriculture
What is additionally needed for the NFSB
• Fiscal resources (annually)– 16000 crores for Maternity Entitlements– 27500 crores for expanded PDS coverage– 10000 crores for other schemes
• Foodgrains– 62 million MTs as compared to 55 million MTs
of food grains being currently provisioned
Issues still open to debate?
• Universal vs Targeting – Universality of the problem– Inclusion and exclusion errors in identification– Targeted rights?
• Food vs. Cash– Procurement– Inflation indexing– Intra-household equity– Banking infrastructure– Corruption