Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

download Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

of 19

Transcript of Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

  • 7/25/2019 Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

    1/19

    R H E T O R I C A N D

    M E A N I N G

    E N G 2 1 1 : R H E T O R I C

    T U E S D AY F E B R U A R Y 9 2 0 1 6

  • 7/25/2019 Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

    2/19

    TEACHING DEMOSBY FACULTY CANDIDATES

    Thank you for your great participation. You did a ne

    representing the university and our students.

    Thank you for the feedback submitted via the online

    The committee will meet tomorrow to discuss the ca

    We have to recommend a candidate to the dean, whapprove the hire. Then we have to make an oer an

    the candidate accepts it. We hope to have everythin

    wrapped up by net week.

  • 7/25/2019 Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

    3/19

    REMINDER/UPDATE:RHETORICAL ANALYSIS 1

    !ue THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 11

    (THIS WEEK)

    "#T, $ am going to oer a pre%emgeneral etension to TUESDAY,

    FEBRUARY 16 (NEXT WEEK)

  • 7/25/2019 Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

    4/19

    TWENTIETH CENTURY CONTEXTSThe $ndustrial &evolution brought wealth

    prosperity to some and alienation to oth World War $ and World War $$ caused mathe West to 'uestion the basic values ofwestern culture and philosophy.

    (ew communication media in)uenced,demanded, new ways of conceptuali*ingrhetoric.

  • 7/25/2019 Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

    5/19

    L I N G U I S T I C

    R E F L E X I V I T Y T H E I N T E L L E C T U A L R E F L E C T I O N O N

    T H E F O R C E S O F L A N G U A G E I N H U M A

    R E L A T I O N S

  • 7/25/2019 Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

    6/19

    WHAT IS BEING REJECTED, REPLA +lato does not understand language as a system of usage, and

    does not understand language as having its own independent -f

    01ondit, 'uoted in "orchers 2234. lato thus presumed that language was pure and misuse of lang

    miscommunication was caused by evil people, not the inade'ua

    language itself.

    5ristotle +maintains an attitude that sees language as tied to so

    objective, eternal set of meanings, an hence not as the locus o

    force a process with its own distinctive characteristics/ 0ibid4. 6pistemologists wanted to put aside language and rhetoric and

    +truths/ of science speak through the rhetor. 7f course, science

    language and rhetoric and is not pure or +true./

  • 7/25/2019 Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

    7/19

    L IN G UISTIC REF L EXIV ITY: THREE ID EAS.

    8anguage has its own distinct structure9 we have parts

    0types of words4 and grammar 0the rules of how things

    together4 and these are used to suggest meaning, enacommunication.

    The structure of language in)uences how we see and u

    the world9 for eample, 6nglish is marked by the tense

    and does not have and its fundamental basis in dichoto

    $n some situations, it is useful to use language in dierthan its structure suggests9 political and social commen

    often re'uires or benets from using language in new,

    ways 0he:she or *e:*ir:they4

  • 7/25/2019 Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

    8/19

    THE MEANING OF SYMBOLS ANDSEMANTIC TRIANGLE

    The ;emantic Triangle

    outlines the relationships

    between symbols,

    thoughts, and referents.

    1ontet plans a key role

    in how people determine

    the meaning of symbols.

  • 7/25/2019 Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

    9/19

    HOW THE TRIANGLE WORKS 17&&61T9 1ausal relationship

    between thought < symbols 0words,

    images, etc4= ;ome thoughts bring to mind specic

    symbols.

    = ;ome symbols make us think certainthoughts.

    5!6>#5T69 5 causal relationship

    between thought and referents

    0actual objects or things4

    =The object itself can lead us to think ofthe idea.

    = 5n idea can cause of thing of the object

    itself.

    The Treachery

    2@AB%2@A@ 0often call

  • 7/25/2019 Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

    10/19

    CONTEXT AND MEANING $nterpretation is deeply in)uenced by th

    audiences social, cultural, and personalbackground.

    Temporality has evolved over time, from

    constant present of 1lassical Creeks to o

    often multivalent, blended temporality. 6amples of 1ontet and ?ultiple ?eani

    =(ative 5mericans and ;ports ?ascots

    =Whiteface and "lackface

  • 7/25/2019 Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

    11/19

    GENERAL SEMANTICISTSTheir work was in)uential but isnt actively ke

    ;ought to remove misunderstanding from rhe

    Ceneral ;emantics eplains that words are no

    objects they represent.

    Words can be abstract, or multiordinal.

    Words structure our eperience, but they are nsame as eperiences.

  • 7/25/2019 Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

    12/19

    GENERAL SEMANTICISTS:EXTENSIONAL DEVICES

    &ecommended using etensional devices can help av

    misunderstanding.

    = $ndeing is the use of subscript numerals to indicate the uni'two words.

    = 1hain%indeing is used to indicate dierent states of the sam

    = !ating shows how the meaning of a word changes over time

    = #sing +etc./ indicates that we can never say all there is to satopic.

    = >uotes are used to indicate the specic meaning of a term.

    = Dyphens should be used when two ideas have previously beto be dierent, but may, in fact, refer to the same idea.

  • 7/25/2019 Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

    13/19

    EXTENSIONAL DEVICES WE STILL 6tc. is a very common appendage to indicate the inepres

    or compleity of a topic.

    = ;imilar phrases used in 6nglish9 +such like,/ +and so forth,/ +yada, yetc.

    >uotation marks9 etremely common in academic and ver

    6nglish. "ut, it is often used ironically and:or sarcastically.

    = Eor eample, $ might say9 ?artin 8uther Fings approach to rhetoric ethos, pathos, and logos in an attempt to create a +anguished rheto

    = 7r, $ might say9 ;teve and Gudy left the party +to go the store/ to +bparty supplies/ but +got delayed./ They seemed pretty +worn out/ got back to the party.

    Dyphens9 again, etremely common in academic 6nglish. 5

    vernacular 6nglish we use hyphens in a less formal or struc

    = Eor eample, a music critic could refer to the approimately 3HI suheavy metal using hyphens9 nu%metal, black%metal, death%metal, J

    1hristian%metal, funk%metal, stoner%metal, etc.

  • 7/25/2019 Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

    14/19

    GEORGE HERBERT MEAD ANDSYMBOLIC INTERACTION

    Dumans have a mind, or the capability of using symbols.

    The self refers to our ability to respond to ourselves as obje

    = We form ideas about who we are based on the generali*ed other anothers.

    = 7ur self has two components.

    The $ is the impulsive part of the self. The me is the part that responds to social rules and norms that are lea

    rhetoric.

    ;ociety refers to the collection of people who share commo

    meanings for symbols.

    S G C

  • 7/25/2019 Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

    15/19

    S I G N I F I C A N T

    S Y M B O L S : S I G N S

    T H A T A R O U S E

    M E A N I N G I N S E L

    A N D O T H E R SW H AT S Y M B O L S A R E S H U S E C I F I C

    AN D S E N S I B L E O N LY T O U S !

  • 7/25/2019 Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

    16/19

    SUSANNE LANGER AND EXPERIENTHAT ESCAPE SYMBOLIZATION

    !iscursive rhetoric is the

    linear display of

    grammatical words and

    symbols.

    resentational rhetoric isnot reducible to symbols

    and includes art, music,

    and visual imagery.

    $ am so overwhelmed that $ just nee

  • 7/25/2019 Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

    17/19

    SYMBOLS CAN BE USED TO MANAGPOWER RELATIONS

    ?uted group theory notes that women a

    forced to eperience the world and

    communicate through the language of m

    Women who eperience childbirth havedeveloped new ways of using symbols to

    accurately re)ect their eperiences.

    ;eual harassment is a linguistic form of

    violence.

  • 7/25/2019 Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

    18/19

    RICHARD WEAVER: THE RELATIONSAMONG SYMBOLS, MEANING, AND T

    !ialectic is used to nd truth while rhetoric mo

    people to take action.

    !ialectic and rhetoric are used to determine w

    right and wrong.

    The most ethical argument form is from princi

    while the least ethical is from circumstance.

    1ertain types of words have great power to m

    people to action or accept ideas about what is

    wrong.

  • 7/25/2019 Rhetorical Theory Chapter 5

    19/19

    R O B E R T S C O TR H E T O R I C I S

    E P I S T E M I CI F R H E T O R I C I S E I S T E M I C , T H E N

    R E " U I R E S T H A T U S E R S B E E T H I C A L