RFC 6-Mediterranean Corridor TAG RAG · Involvement of ADIF within the Corridor ... Executive Board...

RFC 6-Mediterranean Corridor

TAG RAG (EEIG RFC 6 Copyright; Andrea Galluzzi Managing Director)

Madrid 23rd April 2015

EEIG RFC 6 © -‐ Andrea Galluzzi

1.1 Agenda (approval of)

PT Topic Speaker Timing Welcome Coffee-Registration 9:30-10:00

1

Opening of the meeting and welcome to the RU and TM representatives Ø  Adoption of the agenda; Ø  Appointment of the secretary of the Meeting;

Chairman 10:00-10:15

2 ADIF introduction. Involvement of ADIF within the Corridor ADIF 10:15-10:45

3 RFC 6 Mediterranean Corridor state of play and Customer Satisfaction Survey MD 10:45-11-15

4

TAG representative appointment (Coordinator Deputy Director) RAG representative appointment (Coordinator Managing Director)

11:15-12:00

5 Performance DD 12:00-12:30

6 RFC 6 Mediterranean Corridor OSS: TT 2016 – State of play TT 2017 – Procedures

OSS 12:30-13:00

LUNCH BREAK 13:00-14:00

Visit to the Terminal of Abroñigal 14:00-16:00


1.2 Appointment of the Secretary of the Meeting


2 ADIF introduction. Involvement of ADIF within the Corridor


Regulation concerning the European Rail Network for Competitive Freight (913/2010)

Regulation 1315/2013 Art. 48 The provisions of this Chapter shall be without prejudice to the governance structures set out in Regulation (EU) No 913/2010.

3 Regulation 913/2010


Article 1 Purpose and scope 1.  This Regulation lays down rules for the establishment and

organization of international rail corridors for competitive rail freight with a view to the development of a European rail network for competitive freight. It sets out rules for the selection, organization, management and the indicative investment planning of freight corridors. Enhance the market share of rail freight transport



Almería-Valencia/Madrid-Zaragoza/Barcelona-Marseille- Lyon-Turin-Milan-Verona-Padua/Venice-Trieste/Koper- Ljubljana-Budapest-Zahony (Hungarian-Ukrainian border)

Deadline for implementation 10th November 2013

Rail Freight Corridor 6



Article 8 Governance of freight corridors Ø  Executive board (Composed of Ministers) Ø  Management board (Composed of Infrastructure Managers &

Allocation Bodies) Ø  Advisory Groups (Railway undertakings and terminal managers/

owners)

Article 9 Implementation Plan (including Transport Market Study)


Article 13

Ø  One-stop shop for requests of capacity allocation; Ø  The management board for a freight corridor shall designate or

set up a joint body for applicants to request and to receive answers, in a single place and in a single operation, regarding infrastructure capacity for freight trains crossing at least one border along the freight corridor.

Ø  Reserve Capacity; Ø  PAPS;


Obligations


Ar#cle 16 Ø  Traffic management

Ar#cle 18 Ø  CID (Corridor Informa?on Document)

Ar#cle 19 Ø  Quality of service on the freight corridor Ø  Performances (indicators and objec?ves – report once a

year);


3 State of play - Executive Board

The Executive Board of Rail Freight Corridor 6 was established through an administrative agreement signed in Brussels on 11th March 2013 by the Ministries of Transport of Spain, France, Italy, Slovenia and Hungary. Through this agreement the involved Ministries decided to take over all the tasks and responsibilities of the Executive Board of the ERTMS Corridor D, as instituted by the letters of intent of 12 December 2006 and 12 April 2007. The Executive Board of Rail Freight Corridor 6 is chaired by the Ministry of Transport of France.


State of the art: April 2012 Setting Up of Rail freight Corridor 6 Management Board

State of play Management Board – EEIG General Assembly

EEIG RFC 6 © -‐ Andrea Galluzzi EEIG RFC 6 © -‐ Andrea Galluzzi

A Permanent Management Office was set up in Milan (Italy) in a RFI fenced area during summer 2013 for corridor management, leaded by the Italian partner RFI, to implement the Rail Freight Corridor 6 and to ensure the functioning of the EEIG. Ø  Managing Director: Mr. Andrea Galluzzi;

Ø  Infrastructure Advisor: Mr. István Pákozdi;

Ø  One Stop Shop Leader: Mr. Pierre Chauvin;

Ø  Administrative Assistant: Mrs. Giulia Gargantini;

Ø  Advisory support;

3 State of play Permanent Management Office


3 RFC 6 Mediterranean Corridor Achievements 2013 Setting Up - 2014 Strenghtening and documents update

10th November 2013 – 10th November 2014

C-OSS Setting Up

Ø  Reserve Capacity 2014 Ø  OSS Procedure Ø Web site

CID Drafting

Ø  Book n. 1 - Introduction Ø  Book n. 2 – N.S. Ø  Book n. 3 - TM Info Ø  Book n. 4 - Capacity & TM Ø  Book n. 5 - IP

Implementation Plan Ø  TMS

Ø  CID

Applicant

14th January 2014 12th January 2015

Time table 2015/2016

RFC 6 Strategic

Communica:on Plan

14th April 2014 13th April 2015


3 Rail Freight Corridor 6 Strategic Communication Plan


Objective

All possible (present and future) Clients (RUs and AAs) To be made aware of:

Ø  Opportunity and advantages of the regulation; Ø  Commercial Offer of RFC 6; Ø Procedures to be used to book PAPS Ø  IT tools - PCS; Ø Timing;

3 RFC 6 TIMETABLE 2015

•  Macro Indicators

PAP sections Offer

Requests

TOTAL NUMBER OF REQUESTS : 37

TOTAL NUMBER OF PAP SECTIONS OFFERED : 140

TOTAL NUMBER OF PAP SECTIONS REQUESTED : 60 42%

NUMBER OF RUS AND AAS: 8


3 OSS State Of Play TT 2016 Figures

Ø  Number of requests received at COSS (37 in 2015) Ø  Increase of request of more than 100% (2016/2015)

Ø  Number of conflicting requests Ø  4 with RFC2; Ø  2 with concultation process; Ø  9 without possible alternatives proposal;

Ø  Number of alternative proposals (Italy)

Ø  Requests together with RFC2; Ø  Requests together with RFC7;

Ø  Customers requesting capacity;

77

15

2

10

4

10


3 Customer Satisfaction Survey RFC6

Ø  19 respondents 19 RFC6 users / 0 non-users 19 full interviews / 0 partial interviews 7 nominated by RFC6 / 12 nominated by other RFCs 4 agreed to forward name;

Ø  Computer Aided Web Interviews (CAWI);

Ø  Contacts (e-mail address) delivered by RFCs;

Ø  35 e-mail invitations sent;

Ø  Field Phase: 3 September to 6 October 2014


4,34,1

4,13,93,93,9

3,83,83,83,83,8

3,7

3,6

3,63,63,63,5

3,53,43,43,4

3,43,43,43,33,33,33,3

3,33,3

3,23,2

3,13,1

3,02,9

3,6

3,63,6

3,7

1 2 3 4 5 6

meanavailability of C-OSS

adequacy of netw ork of linesRAG meetings

information on RFCX w ebsitecommunication w ith management board (except RAG meetings)

information from operation centreshandling of complaints w ithin RFC

PCS overallhelpfulness of traff ic management by infrastructure managers

representation in RFC governance structure (RAG/TAG)availability/know -how of performance manager

business know -how of C-OSScomprehensibility of CID

content of CIDprovision of terminals

structure of CIDusability of PCS - selection of remaining capacity

infrastructure standardsoverall offers by C-OSS

brochures of RFCXsupply of terminal information

usability of PCS - selection of PAPsusefulness of information in case of disturbances

involvement of RU in coordination processperformance reportsnew sletters of RFCX

value of information in list of w orksmeasures to improve punctuality

usability of PCS - display of remaining capacitygranularity of list of w orks

process of conflict solving by C-OSSannual report of RFCXPAP reserve capacity

result of allocation process by C-OSSPAP parameters

usability of PCS - display of PAP-offerusability of PCS - modif ication/post-processing of PAPs

PAP quantity (number of paths)origin/destinations and middle stops in PAP

PAP schedule (adequate travel/departure/arrival times)

3 Summary - Satisfaction Rating

Top 10 aspects

Bo?om 10 aspects


3 Lessons Learnt

Ø  Acknowledgment of the Commitment of Corridor management, IMs and Abs in the seSng up of the Corridor Governance and Opera?onal ac?vi?es recognized (Governance, procedures, OSS, TAG RAG, communica?on, web site etc);

Ø  Acknowledgment of the Commitment of Corridor management, IMs and ABs in the draVing and presenta?on of the Official documents but room for improvements);

Ø  BeWer involvement of RU in the Capacity offer building;

Ø  Capacity offer to be improved either in terms of Quan?ty and Quality (TT and RC);

Ø  Other issues to be further analyzed more related to general railway transport;


3 Extension to Croatia 10th November 2016


Ø  Extension of the EEIG to Croatian Infrastructure manager 2016; Ø  Strengthening of Traffic management procedures 2015-2016; Ø  Monitoring and update of the Implementation Plan and Corridor

Information Document 2015-2016 (including the update of Transport Market Study);

Ø  Commercial strengthening of the Corridor (One Stop Shop) 2015-2016 Ø  Including a last mile survey on the Corridor;

Ø  Support to the realization of European Rail Network of freight corridors 2015 2016; Ø  European Framework for Capacity Allocation; Ø  Harmonization of operational procedures; Ø  Organization of TAG RAG Common meeting in cooperation with other

Corridors; Ø  Communication 2015 2016;

3 RFC 6 Mediterranean Corridor Next steps


Relaunch of ERTMS Activity

Ø  New RFC 6 Activity

Ø  Collection of National requirements to be exported to ERTMS (no deviation from Technical Specification of ERTMS);

Ø  Definition of an harmonized authorization procedure for putting in service (trackside cross border section-on board) along the corridor in strong cooperation with the involved NSAs (National Safety Authorities);

Ø  Harmonized operational rules along the corridor; Ø  Operational test case definition and management; Ø  Bilateral activities; Ø  Exchange of technical results from National ERTMS Pilot lines (eg. Italian and

Slovenian Pilot lines);

3 RFC State Of Play - ERTMS


Purpose:

Ø  Organization of preparatory meetings for TAG RAG (same day of TAG RAG) in order to independently collect needs, inputs, requests to be analyzed, prioritized and presented to the RFC 6 management during TAG RAG;

Ø  Cooperation with RFC 6 management in the preparation of TAG RAG agenda; Ø  Representation of TMs and RUs interested in the use of RFC 6 in the institutional

meetings with EC (where necessary); Ø  Representing RFC6 TMs and RUs in the forthcoming common TAG RAGs; Ø  Providing RFC 6 with urgent inputs in the period between TAG RAG meetings; Ø  Proposing to RFC 6 new TMs and/or RUs to be included in the TAG RAG contact list; Ø  Proposing to RFC 6 change to the TAG RAG procedures;

4 TAG RAG Representatives

Appointment


Candidates:

Ø  TAG: Mr Carles Rua (port of Barcelona);

Ø  RAG: Mr Aldo Maietta (Trenitalia);

Ø  Other Candidates presented during the meeting;

Ø  Mandate: 2 years renewable once;


Appointment


Steps:

Ø  TAG meeting coordinated by the RFC 6 MD for TAG representive appointment and general agreement (or amendment proposal) on the general objectives;

Ø  RAG meeting coordinated by the RFC 6 DD for TAG representive appointment and general agreement (or amendment proposal) on the general objectives;

Ø  Based on the agreed objectives, TAG and RAG representatives and RFC 6, will draft, the new TAG RAG representative “job description” to be circulated within one month.


Appointment


4 Train Performance Management

Ø  TPM Manual adopted on 16th March 2015; Ø  Final version circulated on 2nd April 2015; Ø  The structure and the content is based on the

Guidelines for Freight Corridor Punctuality Monitoring by RNE;


Ø  Actors involved



N° Indicator Measurement Details 1 Number of trains All international freight trains on corridor Figure to describe the

situation on corridor 2 Train-km All international freight trains on corridor Figure to describe the

situation on corridor 3 Punctuality Sample of trains Figure used for

analysis 4 Average speed Sample of trains Figure used for

analysis 5 Delays Sample of trains Figure used for

analysis 6 Delay causes Sample of trains Figure used for

analysis 7 Cancellations Sample of trains Figure used for

analysis 8 Data completeness Sample of trains Figure used




Ø  Content of a reports ü  Detailed TPM reports are produced monthly by the Corridor Technical Coordinators and

are used by operational bodies (PMO, IMs) to investigate the causes of bad performance, for identifying the operational bottlenecks and as a basis for the definition of corrective actions;

ü  TPM reports are generated by means of Oracle Business Intelligence (OBI) tool; ü  Reports by OBI give an indication of where problems occur, but there is still a need to

look into the national systems to do a more in-depth analysis; ü  Data quality; ü  Standardized template reports; ü  Standard and/or the customized reports are the basic papers for the bi-/trilateral

meetings – Rus; ü  Confidentiality agreements;


6 COSS State of Play RECOMMANDATIONS SUMMARY FROM National Info Days

Ø  Focus on PaP sections required by the market, tuning of parametres; Ø  (PaPs Sections as part of long distances international paths needs); Ø  Adjust the volumes of PaPs according to % market and potential developpments; Ø  Set up a dialogue phase with RUs and IMs for long term planning and needs; Ø  Support customers and facilitate development actions together with Ims;

Ø  Focus on coordination at borders as added value of the corridor; Ø  Pay attention to the number of days offered / Possessions / Week-End; Ø  FOCUS on improving PCS user interface; Ø  IT Improvements of management of subsidaries; Ø  Consider remaining volumes for reserve capacity activities for short term needs;

Commercial

Technical


6 COSS State of Play PREPARATION OF PAPs FOR TIMETABLE 2016 (RFC6 Members)

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

VPE SZ RFI SNCFRESEAU

TP FERRO ADIF

% Days covered weekly pattern 2015Avr 93%

0,00

100,00

200,00

300,00


TP FERRO ADIF

Km/Section 2015Avr 184 km

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80


TP FERRO ADIF

Offered Section 2015Avr 184 km

0

500000

1000000

1500000

2000000

2500000

3000000

3500000

4000000


TP FERRO ADIF

Km*days 2015Avr 184 km


0

2000000

4000000

6000000

8000000

10000000

12000000

14000000

KM*days offer KM*days Req

Timetable 2016

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

PaP Offered Days PaP Req Days

Timetable 2016

6 COSS State of Play TIMETABLE 2016 INTERMEDIATE FIGURES

Ø  25 % Requested KM*Days

Ø  15 % Requested Days


6 COSS State of Play TIMETABLE 2016 INTERMEDIATE FIGURES

Ø  Overall share of PaPs distances

34%

66%

Timetable 2016

PAP KM*Day

Feeder/Outlow KM


6 COSS State of Play TIMETABLE 2016 PAP REQUESTS COVERAGE


6 COSS State of Play TIMETABLE 2016 PAP REQUESTS COVERAGE

TOP 4 PaPs Requested


6 COSS State of Play BORDER COORDINATION 2016

Spain France Spain France France Italy Italy Slovenia Slovenia Hungaria1 Sibel in23456 *278 Sibel in910 Amberieu11 Amberieu12 *21314151617 *3 (Pry, Sib, Amb)1819 *22021 Sibel in *222 Veniss ieux23 *324

Hungaria Slovenia Slovenia Italy Italy France France Spain France Spain1 *2

23 *2 Amberieu4 Sibel in5 *2 Sibel in6 *27 Perpignan891011 *31213141516 Perigny17 *3 Gevrey18 Sibel in192021222324

CERBERE TP FERRO

TP FERRO CERBERE


6 COSS State of Play FIRST REMARKS FROM REQUESTS RECEIVED IN APRIL

Ø  Increase in volumes of requests; Ø  Increase of geographical scope of use of the corridor; Ø  Future multicorridor synergies; Ø  Increase of Number of customers using the corridor; Ø  Better use of PAP to contruct International Request; Ø  Better coordination between Applicants; Ø  Some PaP sections are heavily requested; Ø  Use of Flex PaP concept for minor timetable adjustements; Ø  PCS has improved for use of RFC; Ø  Nb Days requested is still not so high; Ø  PCS still not used everywhere; Ø  PaP offer not high enougth for alternative proposals; Ø  Long distance requests are covered with a short distance of PaPs;


6 COSS State of Play TIMETABLE 2017 PREPARATION

ü  Applicant must take part of the preparation work for the establishment of PaPs 2017.

ü  RFC6 C-OSS will evaluate the need for PaPs for TT2017 from:

ü  Experience of the previous year and paths requests; ü  Whishes expressed by applicants; ü  RFC6 market study; ü  Evaluation of needs for the reserve capacity;

ü  Applicant are asked to provide RFC6-COSS with their wishes for TT 2017 following a specific calendar;

ü  RFC6 C-OSS is providing participants with a template: ü  Common approach with corridors 4 and 2 in France;


6 COSS State of Play PREPARATION OF PAPs FOR TT 2017

PRE-ARRANGED PRODUCT (PaPs)

January 2015

April September

Decembre 2015 January2016

PaPs publication For 2017 TT

A B

PaP evaluation phase

C

Construction and concertation phase

May

FRANCE SPAIN ITALY

ITALY SLOVENY HUNGARY

Construction and concertation phase


6 COSS State of Play 2017 PaP preparation (applicant contribution)

Ø  Template to fill in with as much information as possible

Ø  RFC 6 will gather and analyse these « wishes»

Ø  RFC6 MB together with IM’s will decide which to « identify » as PaPs Ø  Criteria :

Ø  Using corridor lines; Ø  Regular traffic > 4 days a week; Ø  Possessions impacts; Ø  International traffic crossing at least one border; Ø  Connections with other corridors; Ø  ….


Thank you !


RFC 6-Mediterranean Corridor TAG RAG · Involvement of ADIF within the Corridor ... Executive Board...

Documents

Transcript of RFC 6-Mediterranean Corridor TAG RAG · Involvement of ADIF within the Corridor ... Executive Board...