Investigation of Acoustic Localization of rf Cavity Breakdown
RF Cavity Design -...
-
Upload
nguyenkien -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
4
Transcript of RF Cavity Design -...
RF Cavity Design
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 1
Erk Jensen
CERN BE/RF
CERN Accelerator SchoolAccelerator Physics (Intermediate level)
Darmstadt 2009
Overview• DC versus RF
– Basic equations: Lorentz & Maxwell, RF breakdown• Some theory: from waveguide to pillbox
– rectangular waveguide, waveguide dispersion, standing waves …
waveguide resonators, round
waveguides, Pillbox cavity
• Accelerating gap– Induction cell, ferrite cavity, drift tube linac, transit time factor
• Characterizing a cavity– resonance frequency, shunt impedance, – beam loading, loss factor, RF to beam efficiency,– transverse effects, Panofsky‐Wenzel, higher order modes, PS 80 MHz cavity (magnetic coupling)
• More examples of cavities– PEP II, LEP cavities, PS 40 MHz cavity (electric coupling),
• RF Power sources• Many gaps
– Why?– Example: side coupled linac, LIBO
• Travelling wave structures– Brillouin diagram, iris loaded structure, waveguide coupling
• Superconducting Accelerating Structures• RFQ’s
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 2
DC VERSUS RF
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 3
DC versus RF
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 4
DC accelerator
RF accelerator
potential qsEqW
d
Lorentz force
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 5
A charged particle moving with velocity through an electro‐
magnetic field experiences a force
BvEqtp
dd
v
The energy of the particle is 2222 mcpcmcW
Note: no work is done by the magnetic field.
Change of W due to the this force (work done) ; differentiate:
tEpcqtBvEpcqppcWW dddd 222
tEvqW dd
12 mcW kin
mpv
Maxwell’s equations (in vacuum)
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 6
20
02
0
01
cEBt
E
BJEtc
B
DC ( ): which is solved by0 E
E
Limit: If you want to gain 1 MeV, you need a potential of 1 MV!
Circular machine: DC acceleration impossible since 0d sE
0t
why not DC?
Bt
E
With time‐varying fields:
AtBsE
dd
1)
2)
Maxwell’s equation in vacuum (contd.)
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 7
012
2
2
Etc
E
EEE
012
2
2
Etc
E
vector identity:
curl of 3rd
and of 1st equation:t
with 4th equation
:
i.e. Laplace in 4 dimensions
00
0012
EBt
E
BEtc
B
Another reason for RF: breakdown limit
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 8
surface field, in vacuum,Cu surface, room temperature
Kilpatrick 1957,
f
in GHz, Ec
in MV/m
cEc eEf
25.4
67.24
Wang & Loew, SLAC-PUB-7684,
1997
Approximate limit for CLIC parameters
(12 GHz, 140 ns, breakdown rate: 10-7 m-1):
260 MV/m
FROM WAVEGUIDE TO PILLBOX
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 9
Wave vector
: the direction of is the direction of
propagation,the length of is the phase shift per
unit length.behaves like a vector.
Homogeneous plane wave
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 10
ck
2
1
c
z ck
ck c
rktuB
rktuE
x
y
cos
cos
xzc
rk sincos
k
k
k
k
z
x
Ey
φ
Wave length, phase velocity• The components of are related to the wavelength in the direction of
that component as etc. , to the phase velocity as
.
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 11
ck
2
1
c
z ck
ck c
zz k
2
k
ck c
ck
zz
z fk
v ,
z
xEy
Superposition of 2 homogeneous plane waves
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 12
+ =
Metallic walls may be inserted where
without perturbing
the fields.
Note the standing wave in x‐direction!
z
xEy
0yE
This way one gets a hollow rectangular waveguide
Rectangular waveguide
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 13
Fundamental (TE10
or H10
) modein a standard rectangular waveguide.
E.g. forward wave
electric field
magnetic field
sectioncross
* dRe21 AHE
power flow:
z
z
-y power flow
x
x
power flow
Waveguide dispersion
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 14
e.g.: TE10
‐wave in
rectangular
waveguide:
a
Z
ac
2
j
j
cutoff
0
22
c
g
zk 2Im
TMfor j
TE,for j
j
00
22
ZZ
kc
general cylindrical
waveguide:
In a hollow waveguide: phase velocity > c, group velocity <
c
free space, ω/c
“slow”
wave
“fast”
wave
Waveguide dispersion (continued: Higher Order Modes)
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 15
Imzk
c
free space, ω/c
TE10
TE10
TE20
TE01
General waveguide equations:
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 16
02
T
cT c
Transverse wave equation (membrane equation):
TM (or E) modesTE (or H) modes
boundary condition:
longitudinal wave equations
(transmission line equations):
propagation constant:
characteristic impedance:
ortho‐normal eigenvectors:
transverse fields:
longitudinal field:
0 Tn 0T 0
dd
0d
d
0
0
zUZz
zI
zIZzzU
j
0 Z
j0 Z
Tue z Te
euzIH
ezUE
z
j
2 zUTc
H cz
j
2 zITc
E cz
2
1j
c
c
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 17
TM (E) modes:
TE (H) modes:
y
bnx
am
nambabT nmH
mn
coscos1
22)(
y
bnx
am
nambabT E
mn
sinsin2
22)(
0201
iforifor
i
mmaT
mnmmn
mnmmE
mn cossin
J
J
1
)(
mma
mT
mnm
mnm
mn
mHmn sin
cosJ
J
22)(TE (H) modes:
TM (E) modes:
where
Ø = 2a
ab
22
bn
am
cc
acmnc
Standing wave –
resonator
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 18
Same as above, but twocounter‐running waves of identical amplitude.
electric field
magnetic field(90°
out of phase)
0dRe21
sectioncross
*
AHE
no net power flow:
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 19
TE11
: fundamental mode
mm/85.87
GHz afc
mm/74.114
GHz afc
TE01
: lowest losses!
mm/74.334
GHz afc
TM01
: axial electric field
E
B
parameters used in calculation: f = 1.43, 1.09, 1.13 fc
, a: radiusRound waveguide
Pillbox cavity
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 20
electric field magnetic field
(only 1/8 shown)TM010
‐mode
Pillbox cavity field (w/o beam tube)
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 21
a
aT01
101
010
J
J1,
...40483.201
aa
aB
aa
aa
Ez
011
011
0
011
010
01
0
J
J1
J
J1
j1
ac
pillbox01
0
ahah
QR
pillbox
)2
(sin
J4
012
0121
301
ha
aQ pillbox
12
2 01
The only non‐vanishing field components :
h
Ø 2a
3770
0
for later:
ACCELERATING GAP
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 22
Accelerating gap
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 23
gap voltage
• We want a voltage across the gap!
• The limit can be extended with a material which acts as “open circuit”!
• Materials typically used:– ferrites (depending on f-range)– magnetic alloys (MA) like Metglas®, Finemet®,
Vitrovac®…
• resonantly driven with RF (ferrite loaded cavities) – or with pulses (induction cell)
AtBsE
d
ddd
• It cannot be DC, since we want the beam tube on ground potential.
• Use
• The “shield” imposes a– upper limit of the voltage pulse duration or –
equivalently –– a lower limit to the usable frequency.
Linear induction accelerator
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 24
AtBsE
dd
compare: transformer, secondary = beam
Acc. voltage during B
ramp.
Ferrite cavity
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 25
PS Booster, ‘980.6 – 1.8 MHz,< 10 kV gapNiZn ferrites
Gap of PS cavity (prototype)
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 26
Drift Tube Linac (DTL) – how it works
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 27
For slow particles !E.g. protons @ few MeV
The drift tube lengthscan easily be adapted.
electric field
Drift tube linac – practical implementations
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 28
Transit time factor
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 29
If the gap is small, the voltage is small. zEzd
zE
zeE
z
zc
z
d
dj
If the gap large, the RF field varies notably while the particle
passes.
Define the accelerating voltage zeEVz
czgap d
j
Transit time factorExample pillbox:transit time factor vs. h
h/
ah
ah
22sin 0101
CHARACTERIZING A CAVITY
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 30
Cavity resonator –
equivalent circuit
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 31
RR/β
Cavity
Generator
IG
P
C=Q/(R0
)
Vgap
Beam
IB
L=R/(Q0
)LC
β: coupling factor
R: Shunt impedance CL : R‐upon‐Q
Simplification: single mode
Resonance
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 32
Reentrant cavity
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 33
Example: KEK photon factory 500 MHz
‐
R
probably as good as it gets
‐
this cavity
optimizedpillbox
R/Q:
111 Ω
107.5 Ω
Q:
44270
41630
R:
4.9 MΩ
4.47 MΩ
Nose cones increase transit time factor, round outer shape minimizes losses.
nose cone
Loss factor
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 34
0 5 10 15 20
t f0
-1
0
1
qkV
loss
gap
2
Voltage induced by a
single charge
q:t
QLe 20
RR/
Cavity
Beam
C=Q/(R0
)
V
(induced)IB
L=R/(Q0
)LCEnergy deposited by a single
charge q: 2qkloss
CWV
QRk gap
loss 21
42
2
0
Impedance seen by the beam
Summary: relations Vgap
, W, Ploss
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 35
Energy stored inside the
cavity
Power lost in the cavity
walls
gap voltage
loss
gapshunt P
VR
2
2
lossPWQ 0
WV
QR gap
0
2
2
WV
QRk gap
loss 42
2
0
Beam loading – RF to beam efficiency• The beam current “loads”
the generator, in the
equivalent circuit this appears as a resistance in parallel to the shunt impedance.
• If the generator is matched to the unloaded cavity, beam loading will cause the accelerating
voltage to decrease.
• The power absorbed by the beam is
the power loss .
• For high efficiency, beam loading shall be high.
• The RF to beam efficiency is .
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 36
*Re21
Bgap IV
RV
P gap
2
2
G
B
B
gap II
IRV
1
1
Characterizing cavities• Resonance frequency
• Transit time factor
field varies while particle is traversing the gap
• Shunt impedance
gap voltage – power relation
• Q
factor
• R/Qindependent of losses – only geometry!
• loss factor
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 37
lossshuntgap PRV 22
lossPQW 0
CL
WV
QR gap
0
2
2
CL
10
WV
QRk gap
loss 42
2
0
Linac definition
lossshuntgap PRV 2
WV
QR gap
0
2
WV
QRk gap
loss 44
2
0
Circuit definition
zE
zeE
z
zc
z
d
dj
Example Pillbox:
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 38
ac
pillbox01
0
ahah
QR
pillbox
)2
(sin
J4
012
0121
301
ha
aQ pillbox
12
2 01 3770
0
4048.201
S/m108.5 7Cu
Higher order modes
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 39
IB
R3
, Q3
,3R2
, Q2
,2R1
, Q1
,1
......
external dampers
n1 n3n2
Higher order modes (measured spectrum)
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 40
without dampers
with dampers
Pillbox: Dipole mode
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 41
electric field (@ 0º) magnetic field (@ 90º)
(only 1/8 shown)(TM110
)
Panofsky‐Wenzel theorem
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 42
||j FFc
For particles moving virtually at v=c, the integrated transverse force (kick) can be determined from the transverse variation of the integrated longitudinal force!
W.K.H. Panofsky, W.A. Wenzel: “Some Considerations Concerning the Transverse Deflection of Charged Particles in Radio-Frequency Fields”, RSI 27, 1957]
Pure TE modes: No net transverse force !
Transverse modes are characterized by• the transverse impedance in -domain• the transverse loss factor (kick factor) in t-domain !
CERN/PS 80 MHz cavity (for LHC)
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 43
inductive (loop) coupling,
low self‐inductance
Higher order modes
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 44
Example shown:80 MHz cavity PS
for LHC.
Color‐coded:
E
MORE EXAMPLES OF CAVITIES
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 45
PS 19 MHz cavity (prototype, photo: 1966)
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 46
Examples of cavities
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 47
PEP II cavity476 MHz, single cell,
1 MV gap with 150 kW, strong HOM damping,
LEP normal‐conducting Cu RF cavities,350 MHz. 5 cell standing wave + spherical
cavity for energy storage, 3 MV
CERN/PS 40 MHz cavity (for LHC)
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 48
example for
capacitive coupling
cavity
coupling C
RF POWER SOURCES
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 49
RF Power sources
8.410rinput poweeroutput pow
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 50
Thales TH1801, Multi‐Beam Klystron (MBK), 1.3 GHz,
117 kV. Achieved: 48 dB gain, 10 MW peak, 150 kW average, η
= 65 %
> 200 MHz: Klystrons
Tetrode IOT UHF Diacrode
< 1000 MHz: grid tubes
pictures from http://www.thales‐electrondevices.com
dB:
RF power sourcesTypical ranges (commercially available)
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
10 100 1000 10000f [MHz]
CW
/Ave
rage
pow
er [k
W]
Transistors
solid state (x32)
grid tubes
klystrons
IOT CCTWTs
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 51
Example of a tetrode amplifier (80 MHz, CERN/PS)
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 52
22 kV DC anode voltage feed‐through with λ/4
stub
18 Ω coaxial output (towards cavity)
coaxial input matching circuit
tetrode cooling water feed‐throughs
400 kW, with fast RF feedback
MANY GAPS
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 53
What do you gain with many gaps?
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 54
PnRnPRnVacc 22
•
The R/Q
of a single gap cavity is limited to some 100 W.
Now consider to distribute the available power to n
identical
cavities: each will receive P/n, thus produce an accelerating
voltage of .
The total accelerating voltage thus increased, equivalent to a
total equivalent shunt impedance of .
nPR2
nR
1 2 3 n
P/n P/nP/n P/n
Standing wave multicell cavity
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 55
•
Instead of distributing the power from the amplifier, one might
as well couple the cavities, such that the power automatically
distributes, or have a cavity with many gaps (e.g. drift tube
linac).
•
Coupled cavity accelerating structure (side coupled)
•
The phase relation between gaps is important!
Example of Side Coupled Structure
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 56
A 3 GHz Side Coupled Structure to accelerate protons out of cyclotrons from 62
MeV to 200 MeV
Medical application:treatment of tumours.
Prototype of Module 1built at CERN (2000)
Collaboration CERN/INFN/Tera Foundation
LIBO prototype
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 57
This Picture made it to the title page of CERN Courier vol. 41 No. 1 (Jan./Feb. 2001)
TRAVELLING WAVE STRUCTURES
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 58
Brillouin diagram Travelling wave
structure
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 59
synchronous
2
L/c
speed of light line, /c
L
Iris loaded waveguide
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 60
1 cm
30 GHz structure
11.4 GHz structure (NLC)
Disc loaded structure with strong HOM damping “choke mode cavity”
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 61
Dimensions in mm
Power coupling with waveguides
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 62
¼ geometry shown
Input coupler
Output coupler
Travelling wave structure(CTF3 drive beam, 3 GHz)
shown: Re {Poynting vector}
(power density)
3 GHz Accelerating structure (CTF3)
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 63
Examples (CLIC structures @ 11.4, 12 and 30 GHz)
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 64
“T18” reached 105 MV/m!“HDS” – novel fabrication technique
SUPERCONDUCTING ACCELERATING STRUCTURES
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 65
LEP Superconducting cavities
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 66
10.2 MV/ per cavity
LHC SC RF, 4 cavity module, 400 MHz
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 67
ILC high gradient SC structures at 1.3 GHz
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 68
25 ‐35 MV/m
Small superconducting cavities (example RIA, Argonne)
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 69
345 MHz β
= 0.4 spoke cavity
pictures from Shepard et al.: “Superconducting accelerating structures for a multi‐beam driver linac for RIA”, Linac 2000, Monterey
115 MHz split‐ring cavity, 172.5 MHz β
= 0.19 “lollipop”
cavity
β
= 0.021 fork cavity
57.5 MHz cavities:
β
= 0.03 fork cavity
β= 0.06 QWR(quarter wave resonator)
RFQ’S
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 70
Old pre‐injector 750 kV DC , CERN Linac 2 before 1990
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 71
All this was replaced by the RFQ …
RFQ of CERN Linac 2
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 72
The Radio Frequency Quadrupole (RFQ)
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 73
Minimum Energy of a DTL: 500 keV (low duty) ‐
5 MeV (high duty)At low energy / high current we need strong focalisationMagnetic focusing (proportional to β) is inefficient at low energy. Solution (Kapchinski, 70’s, first realised at LANL):
Electric quadrupole focusing + bunching + acceleration
RFQ electrode modulation
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 74
The electrode modulation creates a longitudinal field component that creates the“bunches”
and accelerates the beam.
A look inside CERN AD’s “RFQ‐D”
CAS Darmstadt '09 — RF Cavity Design 75