Revisiting the Age Old Case of Diagnostic Confusion

download Revisiting the Age Old Case of Diagnostic Confusion

of 4

Transcript of Revisiting the Age Old Case of Diagnostic Confusion

  • 7/29/2019 Revisiting the Age Old Case of Diagnostic Confusion

    1/4

    Revisiting the Age Old Case of Diagnostic Confusion: Sociopath vs. Psychopath

    by Daniel Linder

    As Robert Hare had indicated in an article written in 1996, "The distinction between

    psychopathy and anti-social personality disorders is of considerable significance to

    the mental health and criminal justice systems. Unfortunately, it is a distinction that is

    often blurred, not only in the minds of many clinicians but in the latest edition ofDSM-IV."

    The DSM-IV has both disorders; psychopath and sociopath lumped together under

    301.7: Antisocial Personality.

    There is a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others

    occurring since the age 15 years, as indicated by three (or more of the following:

    1-failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by

    repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest

    2-deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases, or conning others for

    personal profit or pleasure3-impulsivity or failure to plan ahead

    4-irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults

    5-reckless disregard for safety of self or others

    6-consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain consistent

    work behavior or honor financial obligations

    While the DSM's diagnostic criteria are accurate and valid to the extent that they

    apply to both psychopathy and sociopathy, the failure to not provide additional

    criteria that would enable the clinician to more clearly distinguish between the two

    has unfortunate treatment implications.

    There is obviously some overlap. For both sociopath and psychopath, lack of remorse,

    being extremely dangerous, deep, longstanding and pervasive characterological

    disturbance, significant family of origin dysfunction, an extremely poor prognosis,

    living on the fringes, alienated existences apply.

    However, they are quite divergent in a number of ways. Let's think in terms of general

    tendencies like appearance, socio-economic status, level of intelligence and education,

    modus operandi, motivation and criminal history.

    Appearance

    A sociopath (ASPD) is known to appear as if it is immediatly apparent that he is

    either in some kind of trouble or he's about to make trouble for someone else. S/heappears to be a non-conformist or someone who was never able to conform. S/he

    usually conjures up a 'tough guy' image that fits the DSM description, "failure to

    conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by repeatedly

    performing acts that are grounds for arrest, irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated

    by repeated physical fights or assaults." Chances are you would not be inclined to

    trust this person.

    The psychopath is known to appear to be just like anyone else. S/he could be you or

    me. There are no distinguishing features that call attention to differences associated

    with any kind of danger. His or her dress is conventional, business-like or casual.

    Chances are, there would be no reason not to trust this person.

  • 7/29/2019 Revisiting the Age Old Case of Diagnostic Confusion

    2/4

    Socio-economic status

    Their disparate appearance tendencies have socio-economic implications. Sociopaths

    generally appear 'rougher' looking or street-wise, perhaps more unkempt and as if they

    come from blue-collar, poorer, disadvantaged backgrounds. They are more likely to

    appear as if they live on the fringes of society.

    We might think of the psychopath's general appearance, on the other hand, to beassociated with being more clean-cut, polished and a white-collar, middle-upper-class

    background. It's more likely that psychopaths are working and not resorting to crime

    to survive.

    Level of intelligence and education

    Continuing in an effort to flesh out sociological distinctions between the two, we may

    also expect the sociopaths to be less educated because of their disadvantaged

    background, and also be less verbal - having less command of the English language.

    Having been raised in a poor, urban, drug-infested, gang and crime-ridden

    environment is a far cry from what it's like in middle-upper class suburbia. Sociopaths

    might also be less intelligent as measured by traditional intelligence testinginstruments.

    Psychopaths, in contrast, are known to often present as articulate, charming and

    charismatic.

    Style/ Modus-operandi (MO)

    There is a dramatic contrast between how the sociopath and psychopath operate in the

    world. We often see the sociopath acting out in public with 'reckless disregard for

    safety of self or others.' We can say the sociopath's anti-social behavior tends to be

    overt, impulsive and without forethought.

    The MO of the psychopath, on the other hand is much more covertly deceptive, and is

    extremely calculated and sophisticated in his or her planning. S/he does not act

    impulsively and carefully plans ahead as to who s/he will prey on, how s/he will go

    about it and what they are going to do to the one preyed on.

    Motivation

    As previously stated, the sociopath's behavior is described as acting with blatant

    disregard for who is around, overtly, impulsively, that is, without fore thought,

    without remorse, in ways commonly associated with anti-social behavior. It is the way

    they have learned to survive in the world. If they want something, they will just take

    it. If they want sex, they will rape someone, someone easy or in close proximity. If

    angry, they will become violent, they operate without any internal controls.As previously stated, the psychopath operates covertly, is careful and methodical and

    selects his prey with an elaborate plan in mind. The psychopath's motivations appear

    to be power driven. S/he gets off on control, manipulation, humiliation, and is a

    master at reading and exploiting other people's vulnerability. Their crimes tend to be

    more ritualistic and involve torture. Compared to sociopaths, psychopaths are masters

    of deception while sociopaths are known to lack that kind of sophistication.

    Criminal History

    We'd expect sociopaths to have extensive criminal histories filled with assaults,

    robberies, rapes and murders. The overwhelming majority has contributing

    drug/alcohol problems, whether they are using, dealing or both. The sociopath'smodus operandi tends to be overt and care little about exposure.

  • 7/29/2019 Revisiting the Age Old Case of Diagnostic Confusion

    3/4

    Psychopaths usually have shorter criminal records, as fewer people are aware of what

    they are doing. Since their modus operandi is of a covert nature, it's less likely they'd

    be arrested. They are not going to get caught as quickly. They operate covertly,

    making sure they cannot be seen or exposed.

    Are these distinctions adequate enough to make two separate diagnoses or are they tobe treated as two distinct disorders?

    It would seem that there are profound treatment and diagnostic implications. While it

    appears that there is some overlap, there are as many, if not more differences between

    the two, that they are not one and the same.

    As Hare stated, "An unfortunate consequence of the ambiguity inherent in the DSM-

    IV is likely to be a court case in which one clinician says the defendant meets the

    DSM-IV definition of ASPD, another clinician say he does not, and both are right!

    The first clinician uses only the formal diagnostic criteria whereas the second agrees

    that the defendant meets the formal criteria but argues that he or she dos not have thepersonality traits described in the 'Associated Features' section of the DSM-IV text.

    The failure to differentiate between psychopathy and ASPD can have serious

    consequences for clinicians, psychiatric patients and society as well."

    "Perhaps this situation, an unfortunate and unnecessary one in my view, will be

    rectified in the DSM-V. Meanwhile, it is worth noting that interpersonal and affective

    traits are more discriminating of the construct of psychopathy than they are the

    socially deviant behaviors reflected in the DSM-IV criteria for ASPD."(Cooke)

    Psychopath

    By Daniel Linder

    In the mirror above the masses

    Faces of predators mask

    Diabolical malevolence

    One driven by insatiable need

    To exploit and humiliate

    Seduce and trap

    In his torture chamber

    There's no escaping

    His merciless snare

    No defense againstAn unknown enemy.

    Only the miracle of happenstance

    Keeps this menace away.

    A mutated soul

    Allegedly a human being

    Who can never change

    Will never change enough

    Can't rehabilitate

    No chance for redemption

    No room for risk

    Or compromiseThe threat he poses

  • 7/29/2019 Revisiting the Age Old Case of Diagnostic Confusion

    4/4

    Must be removed

    He must be caught.

    Taken away,

    Be kept at bay

    Locked away

    Permanently and foreverOr be executed.