Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and...

27
Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D box. -(x) = standing wave = x A sin n x L Extend to 3-D and use Bloch Function to impose periodicity to boundary conditions -(x) = traveling wave = k r exp i k r k x 0, 2 L , 4 2 L ,... k y 0, 2 L , 4 2 L ,... k z 0, 2 L , 4 2 L ,.. We showed that this satisfies periodicity. - r a e i k a r r
  • date post

    21-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    214
  • download

    0

Transcript of Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and...

Page 1: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Review-QM’s and Density of StatesLast time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D box.

-(x) = standing wave =

x Asinnx

L

Extend to 3-D and use Bloch Function to impose periodicity to boundary conditions

-(x) = traveling wave =

k

r exp i

k r

k x0,2L,42L,...k y0,

2L,42L,...k z0,

2L,42L,...

We showed that this satisfies periodicity.

-

r a e i

k

a

r r

Page 2: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Review-QM’s and Density of States

Plug into H = E to find energy.

k 2

2m

k 2

2

2mkx2 ky

2 kz2

Since k, higher energy corresponds to larger k.

For kFx=kFy=kFz (i.e. at the Fermi Wave Vector), the Fermi Surface (surface of constant energy, wave vector, temperature) the is a shpere. This applies to valence band for Si, Ge, GaAs; and couduction band for GaAs.

F 2

2mkF2

< F, filled states

> F, empty states

Page 3: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Fermi Surfaces in Real MaterialsIf kxF≠kFy≠kFz, then you get constant energy ellipsoids. Also, if k=0 is not lowest energy state, (e.g. for pz orbitals where k= is the lowest energy), you don’t get a constant energy sphere.

e.g. Silicon and Germanium

CB energy min occurs at

Si - X point, k= along <100> directions

Ge - L point, k= along <111> directions

Page 4: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Review-QM’s and Density of States

# of states in sphere =

volume_of _ sphere

volume_of _1_ state43kF

3

2L

3

# of electrons = 2x Number of states, because of spin degeneracy (2 electrons per state)

L3 V

N V

3 2kF3

F 2

2mkF2

kF F2m

2

Now we wish to calculate density of states by differentiating N with respect to energy

D dN

d

V

2 22m

2

32

12

Page 5: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Review-QM’s and Density of States

D 1

22me

*

2

32

E EC 12

D 1

22me

*

2

32

EV E 12

Number of electrons, n, can be calculated at a given T by integration.

n D B .E .

f d

Page 6: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Review-QM’s and Density of States

n NC exp EC EF

kT

p NV exp EF EV

kT

NC 2me*kT

22

32

NV 2mh*kT

22

32

Eff. DOS CB

Eff. DOS VB

We can now calculate the n,p product by multiplying the above equations.

np NC NV exp Eg

kT

np ni2=(intrinsic carrier concentration)2

For no doping and no electric fields

n p ni NC NV expEg

2kT

Add a field and n≠p, but np=constant

Page 7: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Outline - Moving On

1. Finish up Si Crystal without doping

2. Talk about effective mass, m*

3. Talk about doping

4. Charge Conduction in semiconductors

Page 8: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Intrinsic SemiconductorsIt is useful to define the “intrinsic Fermi-Level”, what you get for undoped materials. (EF(undoped) = Ei, n=p=ni)

NC exp EC E i

kT

NC exp

E i EV kT

E i EC

kT

EV E i

kT ln

NV

NC

E i EC EV E i kT lnNV

NC

2E i EC EV kT lnNV

NC

2 E i EV EC EV kT lnNV

NC

Page 9: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Intrinsic Semiconductors

E i EV Eg

2 kT lnNV

NC

NV

NC

2 mh

*kT22

32

2 me*kT22

32

mh*

me*

Eg

Si -13 meV 1.12 eV

Ge -7 meV 0.67 eV

GaAs 35 meV 1.42 eV

kT

2ln

NC

NV

The energy offset from the center of the band gap is in magnitude compared to the magnitude of the bandgap.

REMEMBER: There are no states at Ei or EF. They are simply electrochemical potentials that give and average electron energy

Page 10: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Intrinsic Semiconductors

NV

NC

2 mh

*kT22

32

2 me*kT22

32

mh*

me*

E i EV Eg

2 34 kT ln mh*

me*

For Si and Ge, me* > mh*, so ln term < 0, Ei < Eg

For GaAs, me* < mh*, so ln term < 0, Ei < Eg

Page 11: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Effective MassThe text book 3.2.4 derives m* from QM treatment of a wave packet.

m* 2

d2E

dk

(This expression can be derived quantum mechanically for a wavepacket with group velocity vg)

We can use this quantum mechanical results in Newtonian physics. (i.e. Newton’s Secone Law)

F 2

d2E

dk 2

m *dvg

dtm * a

Thus, electrons in crystals can be treated like “billiard balls” in a semi-classical sense, where crystal forces and QM properties are accounted for in the effective mass.

Page 12: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Effective Mass

1

m *1

2d2E

dk 2

1

mij *1

2d2E k dkidk j

or

So, we see that the effective mass is inversely related to the band curvature. Furthermore, the effective mass depends on which direction in k-space we are “looking”

In silicon, for example

mde* m1

*m2*m3

* 13

mde* ml

*mt* 13

Where ml* is the effective mass along the longitudinal direction of the ellispoids and mt* is the effective mass along the transverse direction of the ellipsoids

Page 13: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Effective MassRelative sizes of ml* and mt* are important (ultimately leading to anisotropy in the conductivity)

ml*

mt*

length _of _ellipsoid _ along_ axis

max_width _of _ellipsoid _ perpendicular _ to_ axis

2

1

m *1

2d2E

dk 2

1

mij *1

2d2E k dkidk j

or

Again, we stress that effective mass is inversly proportional to band curvature. This means that for negative curvature, a particle will have negative mass and accelerate in the direction opposite to what is expected purely from classical considerations.

Page 14: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Effective MassOne way to measure the effective mass is cyclotron resonance v. crystallographic direction.

-We measure the absorption of radio frequency energy v. magnetic field strength.

*m

qBc

Put the sample in a microwave resonance cavity at 40 K and adjust the rf frequency until it matches the cyclotron frequency. At this point we see a resonant peak in the energy absorption.

Page 15: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Carrier Statistics in Semiconductors

DCD EE

Doping

-Replace Si lattice atoms with another atom, particularly with an extra or deficient valency. (e.g. P, As, S, B in Si)

εD is important because it tells you what fraction of the dopant atoms are going to be ionized at a given temperature. For P in Si, εD = 45 meV, leading to 99.6% ionization at RT.

Then, the total electron concentration (for and n type dopant) is

Di Nnn

Page 16: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Carrier Statistics in SemiconductorsIf we look at the Fermi Level position as a function of temperature (for some sample), we see that all donor states are filled at T = 0 (n ≈ 0, no free carriers), EF = ED. At high temperatures, such that, ni >> ND, then n ≈ ni and EF ≈ Ei.

EF ranges between these limiting values at intermediate temperatures. (see fig)

Np=ni2 still holds, but one must substitute

n = ni + ND+ p = ni

2/(ni + ND+).

At room temperature n ≈ ND+

For Silicon

- ni = 1010 cm-3.

- ND = 1013 → 1016 cm-3

(lightly doped → heavily doped)

Page 17: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Carrier Statistics in Semiconductors

kT

EENn FCC exp

kT

EEN

nFC

D

exp10

1019

16

This is 60meV/decade. Three decades x 60 meV/decade = 180 meV = EC – EF. EF is very close to the conduction band edge.

Similar to EF(T), let’s look at n(T)

Page 18: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Charge Conduction in Semiconductors2

21

thevmKE

kTKE 23

1-D

3-D (from Statistical Mechanics)Brownian Motion

Applying a force to the particle directionalizes the net movement. The force is necessary since Brownian motion does not direct net current.

amqEF e* q < 0 for e-, q > 0 for h+

Constant Field leads to an acceleration of carriers scaled by me*.

If this were strictly true, e-’s would accelerate without bound under a constant field. Obviously, this isn’t the case. Electrons are slowed by scattering events.

Page 19: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Scattering Processes in Semiconductors

1) Ionized Impurity Scattering

2) Phonon (lattice) Scattering

3) Neutral Impurity Scattering

4) Carrier-Carrier Scattering

5)Piezoelectric Scattering

Page 20: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Scattering Processes in Semiconductors3) - Donors and acceptors under freez-out.

- Low T only

- Defect = polycrystalline Si

4) - e- - h+ scattering is insignificant due to low carrier concentration of one type or another

- e- - e- or h+ - h+ don’t change mobility since collisions between these don’t change the total momentum of those carriers.

5) - GaAs: displacement of atoms → internal electric field, but very weak.

2) - collisions between carriers and thermally agitated lattice atoms. Acoustic

- Mobility decreases as temperature increases due to increased lattice vibration

- Mobility decreases as effective mass increases.

23

25

*~

Tm

Page 21: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Scattering Processes in Semiconductors

23

25

*~

Tm

amqEF e* *

em

qEa

1) Coloumb attraction or repulsion between charge carriers and ND+ or NA

-.

Due to all of these scattering processes, it is possible to define a mean free time, m, and a mean free path lm.

Average directed velocity mata

*,

*,

_.

e

em

e

emdrift

medriftavg

m

q

m

Eqv

av

*

,

1e

e

eme

ed

m

Ev

For solar cells (and most devices) high mobility is desirable since you must apply a smaller electric field to move carriers at a give velocity.

Page 22: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Current Flow in Semiconductors

nqntyconductivi

EJ

EqnJ

qnvJ

densitycurrentJ

nvflux

n

d

d

_

n

n

e-

(cm-3)(cm/s) = e-/cm-2 s

A/cm-2 = C/cm-2 s

Page 23: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Current Flow in Semiconductors

For Holes

Totalhp

h

qpqn

qp

Resistance

n-type

Dn

pn

Nq

pnq

1

11

pn

Nn

pn

D

Page 24: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Mobility

Page 25: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Mobility

Page 26: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Saturation Velocity

Page 27: Review-QM’s and Density of States Last time, we used a quantum mechanical, kinetic model, and solved the Schrodinger Equation for an electron in a 1-D.

Mobility and Impurities