Review of data reported in accordance with the Environmental Noise Directive PART 1 Jaume Fons and...
27
Review of data reported in accordance with the Environmental Noise Directive PART 1 Jaume Fons and Núria Blanes (ETCLUSI) Expert Panel on Noise (EPoN) – Brussels, 7th of September, 2009
-
Upload
daniel-houston -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
3
Transcript of Review of data reported in accordance with the Environmental Noise Directive PART 1 Jaume Fons and...
Review of data reported in accordance with the Environmental Noise Directive
PART 1
Jaume Fons and Núria Blanes (ETCLUSI)
Expert Panel on Noise (EPoN) – Brussels, 7th of September, 2009
INDEX• END Roadmap: where we are and next coming data• DF4
– Current status– Results and outcomes
• DF5– Data reported
• DF6– Review of data reported and analysis being carried out
• DF7– Review of data reported and analysis being carried out
END Roadmap
2002 2005 2007 2008 2009 2012
END entering into force
First ROD: DF1, DF2, DF3
Second ROD: DF4
Third and fourth ROD: DF5, DF6, DF7
Update of DF1
Fifth ROD: DF8
…
…
2010
QCQC
…
…QC
2006 2011
DEVELOPMENT OF A GEODATABASE FOR DEVELOPMENT OF A GEODATABASE FOR THE NOISE DATATHE NOISE DATA
Environmental Noise Directive
Country Reporting Obligations
Noise data provided by the Member States
INPUTS
Quality checkQuality check
NOISE viewerNOISE viewerOUTCOMESOUTCOMES
STATUS OF NOISE IN STATUS OF NOISE IN EUROPE EUROPE
((impact, affectance, impact, affectance, health,…)health,…)
Spatial analysis
Research GIS and WEB
technologies
WORKFLOW
DF4: Current status
DATA PROCESSED:-Data delivered by Member countries until 20th February 2009-Several updates have been already received, and more are expected updated QC of DF4 data will be done by the end of 2009.
DF4: Workflow overview
Excel
Shapefiles
Access application
Data model
Data base
Quality check 2
Georeferenced database
Reference layer / Statistical analysis
Quality check 1INPU
T
OUTPUT
Zero valuesEmpty cellsCompletnessCoherence
Zero valuesEmpty cellsCompletnessCoherence
MetadataSpatial referenceCorrectness SDDF1 vs DF4: data coincidence
MetadataSpatial referenceCorrectness SDDF1 vs DF4: data coincidence
Unique ID1 to 1 relationship
Unique ID1 to 1 relationship
COUNTRY
Quality check 1
RESULTS: QC report + Detailed analysis at country level
RESULTS: Complete database of the noise exposure data
RESULTS: Noise Reference Layer
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Road Rail Airports Industry
Mili
on
s o
f pe
op
le>75
70-74
65-69
60-64
55-59
Agglomerations: sources of noise (Lden)
Noise bands
Noise source
41,2 Mio people exposed
41,2 Mio people exposed
Agglomerations: impact of roads (Lden / Lnight)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 >75
Lden
Num
ber
of p
eopl
e in
milio
ns
All roads
Major roads
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
50-55 55-59 60-64 65-69 >70
Lnight
Num
ber
of p
eopl
e in
mili
ons
All roads
Major roads
27,7 Milion of people27,7 Milion of people42,1 Milion of people42,1 Milion of people
People exposed to major roads (Lden / Lnight)
0
5
10
15
20
25
55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 >75
Lden
Num
ber
of p
eopl
e in
milio
ns
0
5
10
15
20
25
50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 >70
Lnight
Num
ber
of p
eopl
e in
milio
ns
5,6 Milion of people5,6 Milion of people44,5 Milion of people44,5 Milion of people
People exposed to major rails (Lden / Lnight)
0
1
2
3
4
5
55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 >75
Lden
Num
ber
of p
eopl
e in
milio
ns
0
1
2
3
4
5
50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 >70
Lnight
Num
ber
of p
eopl
e in
milio
ns
5,6 Milion of people5,6 Milion of people7 Milion of people7 Milion of people
People exposed to major airports (Lden / Lnight)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 >75
Lden
Num
ber
of p
eopl
e in
thou
sand
s
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 >70
Lnight
Num
ber
of p
eopl
e in
thou
sand
s
0,35 Milion of people0,35 Milion of people1,1 Milion of people1,1 Milion of people
Review of data reported in accordance with the Environmental Noise Directive
PART 2
Jaume Fons and Núria Blanes (ETCLUSI)
Expert Panel on Noise (EPoN) – Brussels, 7th of September, 2009
Data reported – DF5
―Inclusion data deadline: 2nd July 2009―8 countries: No report―Data from 20 countries will be quality checked (incl NO)
Data Flow 5 – Report on all major roads, railways, airports and agglomerations
DF5 - Reporting countries
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Countries that reportedthrough Reportnet
Countries that reportedthrough CIRCA
No report
Nu
mb
er o
f co
un
trie
s
Data reported – DF5 (21 countries)
Agglomerations > 250.000 = 100 +17
Agglomerations < 250.000 = 162
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Austri
a
Bulga
ria
Cypru
s
Czech
Rep
ublic
Denm
ark
Finlan
d
Franc
e
Ger
man
y
Hunga
ry
Irelan
d
Latv
ia
Lith
uani
a
Norway
Portu
gal
Roman
ia
Slova
kia
Spain
Sweden
Switzer
land
Nr
of a
gglo
mer
atio
ns
> 100 000 and < 250 000
> 250 000 (new)
> 250 000
Data reported – DF5 (21 countries)
Major airports
0
5
10
15
20
Austri
a
Belgiu
m
Bulga
ria
Czech
Rep
ublic
Denm
ark
Finlan
d
Franc
e
Ger
man
y
Gre
ece
Hunga
ry
Irelan
dIta
ly
Luxe
mbo
urg
Nethe
rland
s
Norway
Polan
d
Portu
gal
Roman
ia
Spain
Sweden
Switzer
land
Unite
d Kin
gdom
Nr
of a
irpor
ts
New airports
DF1
Major airports
Data reported - DF5
• Rails / roads: large number of segments to be processed.
Data reported – DF5
Difficulties encountered• Not using Reportnet (there are several
templates from the past)• Using Reportnet, but
– not running the automatic QC– Running the QC and accepting errors
• Few countries provided data in spatial format
DF6: Data reported
―Inclusion data deadline: 2nd July 2009
―18 countries: No report―1 country: Partial report―Data from 10 countries will be
quality checked (incl NO)―Need to translate the
information: 4 countries
Data Flow 6 – Noise control programmes that have been carried out in the past and noise-measures in place
DF6 - Reporting countries
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Countries that reportedthrough Reportnet
Countries that reportedthrough CIRCA
No report
Nu
mb
er o
f co
un
trie
s
DF6: First assessment
Noise control programmes: people vs costs
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000
100000000
FI NO UK_Wales UK-Scotland CZ
Total NCP costs Total number of people experiencing noise reduction
Noise Control Programmes - Percentage of costs
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
FI NO UK_Wales UK-Scotland CZ
Pe
rce
nta
ge
of
co
sts
Railways
Roads
Airports
Agglomerations
Noise Control Programmes - Percentage of people experiencing noise reduction per item
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
FI NO UK_Wales UK-Scotland CZ
Pe
rce
nta
ge
of
pe
op
le
Railways
Roads
Airports
Agglomerations
Data reported – DF7
―Inclusion data deadline: 2nd July 2009―18 countries: No report―1 country: Partial report―Data from 10 countries will be quality checked (incl NO)―Need to translate the information: 6 countries
Data Flow 7 – Action plan summaries 1
DF7 - Reporting countries
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
Countries that reportedthrough Reportnet
Countries that reportedthrough CIRCA
No report
Nu
mb
er
of
co
un
trie
s
DF7: First assessment
Action plans: number of people and costs
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
1000000
10000000
100000000
1000000000
10000000000
CZ ES FI IE LT NO PL UK Total DE Total
Total AP costs Total number of people experiencing noise reduction
Action plans - Percentage of costs
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
CZ ES FI IE LT NO PL UK Total DE Total(2
landers)
Pe
rce
nta
ge
of
co
sts
Railways
Roads
Airports
Agglomerations
Action plans - Percentage of people experiencing noise reduction per item
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
CZ ES FI IE LT NO PL UK Total DE Total(2
landers)
Pe
rce
nta
ge
of
pe
op
le
Railways
Roads
Airports
Agglomerations
Thank you very much for your attention
