Revenue Risk, Crop Insurance and Forward Contracting C ory Walters and Richard Preston...

24
Revenue Risk, Crop Insurance and Forward Contracting Cory Walters and Richard Preston [email protected] 859-421-6354 University of Kentucky

Transcript of Revenue Risk, Crop Insurance and Forward Contracting C ory Walters and Richard Preston...

Revenue Risk, Crop Insurance and Forward Contracting

Cory Walters and Richard [email protected]

859-421-6354University of Kentucky

Motivation• Marketing experts say the prudent thing to do in the spring is to

use forward contracts in case prices go down

• Crop insurance salespeople say you need crop insurance in case yields go down

• Producers must understand the underlying price-yield relationship• how forward contracting interacts with crop insurance• Implications of buying back over-contracted yield • Paying crop insurance premiums

Motivation• Agricultural production is risky• Revenue is unknown when making the investment

decision • Tools exist to reduce the chance of revenue < cost• For commodity price - futures market (i.e., forward

contracting)• For yield - crop insurance• Revenue policy interacts with futures market

• Higher costs (same acreage)• In 2006 it took $330,000 to produce a crop and • 2013 it takes over a million dollars

• Farm is concerned with two things• Positive expected income and farm survival (making it to the

next year)

Motivation, The Producer• Farm decisions are based upon knowledge.• Farm size, field location (soil type, distance from

farm), planting date (function of soil type and yield history), hybrids are all taken into account

• Expected profit = $266,000. Vacation time! • Is this useful information? Of course not.• Must look at farm through the eyes of uncertainty

Modeling 2013 Revenue Uncertainty

• Corn production. We plan on adding other farm

• Revenue = yield*price• Producer yield data = de-trended field level over 32

years

• Price data = December 2013 futures market options prices

• Cost = current producer corn production costs for 2013• Important: Cost is a function of yield = $.58 per

bushel.

Objective Function• Crop Income = yield*Price + Crop Insurance(yield,

coverage level, unit type, insurance type (base price, harvest price), premium) + hedged yield*hedged price + hedging cost (interest on margin calls)– Complex!– Hedging = futures hedging using margin account– Account for yield and price relationship

• Correlation is approximately -.187• Relationship depends on location within distribution

– If there is a low yield the chances of a higher price are much better than if yield was average» Copulas to adjust relationship as we move away from the average of

the distribution

Price-Yield Relationship

The Model

•Software: Analytica • Monte Carol simulation through influence diagrams

view of models

• 30,000 runs

• Income is derived from randomly selecting farm level yield and price

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 20120

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Proven YieldLinear (Proven Yield)Trend Adjusted Yield

Original APH = 149.53 bu/ACRE

Trend Adjusted APH = 160.53 bu/ACRE

Trend

No Trend

Hedging risk – Margin calls

Price risk

Risk

Average

December 2013 Corn Futures Prices

December 2013 Corn Futures Prices

• Median = around $5.60• 10% chance price is less than $4.00• 10% change price is greater than $7.55 or so

Farm Corn Yield

Farm average = 144.4 bu/acre

Yields in 1983 and 2012. Rare events do happen !

Most years expect yields between 110 and 170 bu/acre

Farm Corn Yield

•Median = around 155 bushels per acre• 10% chance yield is less than 101 b/ac• 10% change yield is greater than 170 b/ac

• Coverage Level: 80%• Revenue Protection (RP) and RP Harvest Price Exclusion

• Zero Income

Crop Income and InsuranceWith no insurance payments difference is the premium

Insurance payments

• 80% coverage, enterprise units does not guarantee positive income• No hedging at this point

Crop Income With and Without Insurance

• Coverage level: 80%• Revenue Protection (RP) and RP- Harvest Price Exclusion

Insurance

Crop Income, Insurance and Hedging

• Coverage Level: 80%• Revenue Protection (RP) and RP Harvest Price Exclusion• Hedging: 50% of expected production using futures only

• HEDGING PLUS INSURANCE (RP, 80% Coverage Level, Enterprise units), 50% hedged reduces chance of less than zero income by about 13%

CDF of Different Coverage Levels with 50% hedged

• Coverage levels and hedging• Benefit when a bad

outcome occurs• Cost when a bad

outcome does not occur

Crop Income, Insurance, Hedging

-700 -600 -500 -400 -300 -200 -100 0100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

010

2030

4050

6070

8090

100

110

0

1020

3040

5060

7080

90

100

110

010

20304050

6070

8090

100

110

RP

RP-HPE

No Ins

Tail Risk at 1% Percentile

Ave

rage

Inco

me

• At the average income RP provides the highest income because it receives the most subsidy dollars. Insurance beats no insurance because of the subsidy – If you farm forever you will get paid more than you paid in.

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.000

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Average Income and Insurance

No InsRPHPE

Percent Expected Yield Forward Contracted

Inco

me

• Insurance contract: Revenue protection, 80% coverage level, enterprise units

Summary• Everyone faces the same futures prices• Results are specific to yield risk faced by this farm• Location, planting dates, soil types, etc…

• Producer must use RP if forward contracting is used

• Results indicate that crop revenue risk (the bad rare event of 1 in 100 years) are reduced when using crop insurance (RP, enterprise units, 80% CL)• For this farm - $292/acre

• Income risk is further reduced by futures hedging • For this farm - $39/acre (30% hedged)

• Producer does not need to hold as much capital in reserves for a bad event

Caution• Portfolio evaluation• March 1st (Base price just set) to last trading day in

November (December futures enter delivery)

• No storage consideration

• No carry or basis consideration

• No continuous hedging decision making

• No option contracts

Insurance Coverage Level Payouts

• Highest coverage level• provides the highest

chance of receiving a payment

• It also costs the most

Revenue Protection, Enterprise Units, No Hedging

2013 Premium Subsidies, in Percent

Coverage Level Non-Enterprise Enterprise50% 0.67 0.855% 0.64 0.860% 0.64 0.865% 0.59 0.870% 0.59 0.875% 0.55 0.7780% 0.48 0.6885% 0.38 0.53

Crop Income With and Without Insurance

Insurance

• Coverage Level: 65%• Revenue Protection (RP) and RP Harvest Price Exclusion

Insurance