Retirement Practices in HE and other sectors in the UK and ... of the EJRA Review Gr… · Annexe A...

Annexe A

Retirement Practices in HE and other sectors in the UK and Abroad Retirement in the UK

Background

In the UK, longer life expectancy and falling birth rates have resulted in growing concern about the adequacy of pension savings, as retirees are set to draw their pensions for longer and lower birth rates mean there are fewer workers contributing to the system to support them. These concerns have resulted in an increase in the state pension age and the phased introduction of an auto-enrolment system, which requires employers to enrol eligible employees in an approved pension scheme and make mandatory minimum contributions to such schemes.

In 2011, the default retirement age of 65, at which employers could lawfully require their employees to retire, was abolished. Compulsory retirement amounts to unlawful age discrimination unless the retirement can be objectively justified as being a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

UK employers

The majority of UK employers have chosen to abandon compulsory retirement altogether.1 However, some organisations have retained compulsory retirement (EJRA) for certain roles, eg:

The Ministry of Justice operates a compulsory retirement age for judges of 70 years old.2

On average, only 2% of partners within the UK’s top 10 law firms (such as Allen & Overy, Clifford Chance and Linklaters) are over 60 years old.3 Some law firms based in the UK have a set retirement age for its partners. For example, at Eversheds it has been reported that the official retirement age is 60. At DLA Piper the retirement age is negotiable, but set at 65.4

A 2013 Eversheds survey of 307 employers found that 2.9% of respondents had retained a policy of mandatory retirement (compared with 69% in a similar survey in 2011). However, 34% of respondents felt that the abolition of the Default Retirement Age (DRA) had a negative or very negative impact on their organisation (compared with 14% who felt it had been positive); and 48% thought the DRA should be reinstated (compared to 43% who thought the law should remain as is).5

1 Adapted from the Eversheds e-briefing - www.eversheds.com/global/en/what/articles/index.page?ArticleID=en/Employment_and_labour_law/Global_Employment_HR_e-briefing-Compulsory_retirement_an_international_comparison 2 www.judiciary.gov.uk/about-the-judiciary/judges-career-paths/becoming-a-judge/ 3 www.legalweek.com/legal-week/analysis/2373227/age-concerns-examining-the-ages-of-partners-at-the-uks-top-law-firms 4 www.legalweek.com/legal-week/analysis/2373227/age-concerns-examining-the-ages-of-partners-at-the-uks-top-law-firms 5 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lest.12079/pdf

P.1

http://www.eversheds.com/global/en/what/articles/index.page?ArticleID=en/Employment_and_labour_law/Global_Employment_HR_e-briefing-Compulsory_retirement_an_international_comparison

http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/about-the-judiciary/judges-career-paths/becoming-a-judge/

http://www.legalweek.com/legal-week/analysis/2373227/age-concerns-examining-the-ages-of-partners-at-the-uks-top-law-firms




http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lest.12079/pdf

Annexe A

HEIs in the UK

Cambridge University: For University officers, other than the Chancellor, the High Steward, the Deputy High Steward, and the Commissary (who are excluded from Special Ordinance C (ii) 12.), the University operates a retirement age which is at the end of the academic year in which the University officer reaches the age of 67.6

Other Russell Group: several Russell Group institutions have made enquiries about the University’s EJRA but it is not thought that any are actively developing their own policy.

Other HEIs: St Andrews has recently introduced an EJRA of 657. It is not thought that any other UK HEIs have or are developing their own EJRA.

Retirement position in other countries

Many countries around the world have increased (or have plans to do so) the age at which state retirement benefits can be claimed.8

The following countries have outlawed compulsory retirement: o Spain o the Czech Republic o Poland (employers are also very restricted in their ability to terminate an

employee’s employment for any reason during the four years before state pension age).

o USA (save for certain top level employees who, in some states, can be forced to retire at a set age (in most states no earlier than 65). (See further information below)

o Australia (see further information on HEIs below)

The following countries can enforce retirement: o In France, it is possible, by following a prescribed procedure, to request an

employee to retire when they reach the age of 65 (from November 2016 gradually increasing to 67) and can benefit from a full pension. However, if the employee does not agree, an employer cannot require them to retire until they reach the age of 70.

o In Germany compulsory retirement is possible if the employee’s employment contract expressly provides for automatic termination on reaching the employer’s mandatory retirement age. This must be state pension age (gradually increasing from 65 to 67).

o In Italy, if an employee meets a certain age (currently, 66 years and 3 months for men and gradually increasing to this age from 62 years and 3 months for women) and has paid minimum social security contributions for 20 years, then an employer may lawfully terminate their employment.

o In Canada, the law enables an employer to justify a mandatory retirement age in practice, but justification is very difficult and many employers do not operate compulsory retirement.

o In South Africa it is possible to specify a mandatory retirement age in an employment contract, a separate policy or the rules of a company retirement fund. Unlike in the other jurisdictions surveyed, there is no lower limit on this age.

6 www.hr.admin.cam.ac.uk/policies-procedures/retirement-policy/statement-policy 7 https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/media/human-resources/new-policy-section-documents/retirement-process/ 8 Adapted from the Eversheds e-briefing - www.eversheds.com/global/en/what/articles/index.page?ArticleID=en/Employment_and_labour_law/Global_Employment_HR_e-briefing-Compulsory_retirement_an_international_comparison

P.2

http://www.hr.admin.cam.ac.uk/policies-procedures/retirement-policy/statement-policy

https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/media/human-resources/new-policy-section-documents/retirement-process/

http://www.eversheds.com/global/en/what/articles/index.page?ArticleID=en/Employment_and_labour_law/Global_Employment_HR_e-briefing-Compulsory_retirement_an_international_comparison

Annexe A

o In Brazil (at state pension age; currently, 65 for men and 60 for women). o In China, once an employee reaches the statutory minimum retirement age (60

for men and 55 for women, or 50 if the woman is in a management position), they no longer hold employment status (instead becoming a “service provider”). This means the employee can be compulsorily retired subject to the approval of the local social insurance bureau.

According to the World Bank Group9 out of 179 countries for which retirement data was available, only 46 (26%) continue to have a mandatory retirement age.

Retirement in Higher Education, by country

Australia Many universities have early retirement policies, with incentives. For example, the James Cook University Australia offers an incentive payment for early retirement.10 Some HEIs offer retirement ‘gratuities’ for staff with at least ten years’ service.11 In most cases, these are not substantial enough to incentivise retirement amongst highly-paid academic staff. Germany

In Germany academics must retire at 65 years old, unless they obtain a three-year extension

to work until the age of 68.12

The Netherlands The Collective Labour Agreement for Dutch Universities (CAO NU) specifies that an

individual’s employment is terminated on the day they become entitled to the basic state

pension (Article 8.4, clause 7). They can reach a local agreement about continuing to work

after reaching the pensionable age, either as an employee or otherwise, but their

employment must first be terminated13.

USA As employers in the USA are generally prohibited from requiring employees to retire at a certain age, early/retirement incentive programmes have become popular. All major colleges and universities have such programmes in place for eligible employees, usually offering financial incentives. Many organisations also offer retirement from age 55 (subject to satisfying eligibility criteria). Princeton University allows its staff to retire from age 55, subject to satisfying the eligibility criteria.14 In addition, the university offers tenured faculty members who are between the age of 65 and 70, and with a minimum of ten years’ service, an opportunity to receive an ‘age-based’, salary-related bonus upon signing a retirement agreement, under their ‘Bonus Faculty Retirement plan’. The payments available under this plan are as follows15:

9 http://wbl.worldbank.org/data/exploretopics/getting-a-job 10 www.jcu.edu.au/policy/hr-staff-development/early-retirement-policy 11 www1.rmit.edu.au/policies/resignationandretirement 12 www.nature.com/news/the-retirement-debate-stay-at-the-bench-or-make-way-for-the-next-generation-1.17487 and www.neuropenews.org/?p=3269 13 https://extranet.uva.nl/en/a-z/content/pension/pension.html 14 www.princeton.edu/dof/policies/publ/fac/firp/retirement/ 15 www.princeton.edu/dof/policies/publ/fac/firp/retirement/

P.3

http://wbl.worldbank.org/data/exploretopics/getting-a-job

https://www.jcu.edu.au/policy/hr-staff-development/early-retirement-policy

http://www1.rmit.edu.au/policies/resignationandretirement

http://www.nature.com/news/the-retirement-debate-stay-at-the-bench-or-make-way-for-the-next-generation-1.17487

http://www.nature.com/news/the-retirement-debate-stay-at-the-bench-or-make-way-for-the-next-generation-1.17487

http://www.neuropenews.org/?p=3269

https://extranet.uva.nl/en/a-z/content/pension/pension.html

http://www.princeton.edu/dof/policies/publ/fac/firp/retirement/


Annexe A

Age when signing Bonus When bonus

paid Years/semesters eligible to

teach ½ -time

65 1.5 x AY salary

Pay period following signing

Up to 3 years/6 semesters

66 1.25 x AY

salary Pay period

following signing Up to 3 years/6 semesters

67 1.0 x AY salary


Up to 2 years/4 semesters

68 0.75 x AY

salary Pay period

following signing Up to 2 years/4 semesters

69 0.5 x AY salary


Up to 1 year/2 semesters

Or, full time work until retirement:

Age when signing Bonus When bonus

paid Option

Between 65th birthday and 67th birthday

1.0 x AY salary


Work full-time until retire before the end of the AY in which turn 70

When attain 70th birthday:

No longer eligible for the plan

Princeton allows retirees to be appointed as Senior Scholars or Lecturers (with the rank of Professor), subject to certain terms and conditions. For example, lecturers may only be appointed to teach on a part-time course-by-course basis, upon recommendation by the Chair and with the approval of the Board of Trustees for each appointment, with teaching duties normally amounting to at most a single course during any academic year.16 Other US HEIs also have programmes that enable retirees to continue to work or to be involved in the work of the university in some capacity. For example, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology offers the following:

“A professor who retires from a tenured appointment may receive a term appointment (without tenure) if the individual performs compensated teaching, research or service in the department after retirement. Appointments are made by the appropriate department head with approval of the responsible dean. The maximum paid effort of these appointments is 49%. Appointments to this rank are typically on the Modified Annual Salary Plan. Normally, this appointment will be limited to a five-year term but may be renewed thereafter on an annual basis with the approval of the appropriate department head and the responsible dean. At the conclusion of the Professor, Post-Tenure appointment, the Professor, Post-Tenure may be appointed as Professor Emeritus.

Professors holding post-tenure appointments are eligible for benefits as retirees rather than active employees. They do not have consulting privileges for the portion of their time paid for by MIT. Professors, Post-Tenure will retain the title of professor

16 www.princeton.edu/dof/policies/publ/fac/firp/retirement/

P.4


Annexe A

and may continue to use their chair titles for the duration of their term appointments.”17

Furthermore, some universities, such as Princeton and Harvard offer retirees continued health/medical cover, in order to avoid a disincentive to retirement. At Harvard University, retirees receive the following:

“Post-Retirement Health Coverage

The University offers medical and dental coverage for eligible retirees and their

spouses/domestic partners to provide long-term health and peace of mind. Eligibility and

coverage level depend on age and service as well as employment start date. Eligible retirees

and their dependents under age 65 are covered under Harvard's plans for active employees.

Those over age 65 have a choice of senior "medigap" plans that provide coverage for some

expenses not covered by Medicare.”18

17 http://web.mit.edu/policies/2/2.3.html 18 http://hr.harvard.edu/retirement-benefits

P.5

http://web.mit.edu/policies/2/2.3.html

http://hr.harvard.edu/retirement-benefits

Annexe A

P.6

Annexe B

Feedback from Divisions In October and November 2016, Mr Duxfield and Ms Thonemann visited the divisional boards or planning and resources committees of the four main academic divisions and of GLAM (Gardens, Libraries and Museums). Mr Duxfield presented the slides which form the basis of the opening presentations at the open meetings, and asked the members of those committees for their views on the EJRA – both its current working and the way they would like it to develop in future. It was specified that the views sought were those of the head of department; individuals were invited to submit personal views at the open meetings or to the inbox provided as part of the consultation process. A record was taken of the views expressed and those views are summarised here. Overall, the weight of feeling was that the EJRA makes a positive contribution to the ability of departments and divisions to manage their staffing across the range of ages and post types. Its roles in supporting succession planning and refreshment were widely noted. The process that allows for some exceptions also received general support, in particular where it allows someone holding a personal grant that covers their costs and benefits others to continue employment while vacating their substantive post – this view was balanced by widespread concerns about some aspects of how the system operates at present. There were few comments about the age at which the EJRA is set – when this did come up, divisions were surprised by how many staff want a second or subsequent extension or apply to work beyond 70. There did not appear to be a consensus that the EJRA should be moved. The focus of comments was on academic staff, although some boards did explicitly consider what the views of early career researchers might be. Themes The following comments and concerns were common to all or most of the groups.

The EJRA is a useful way to ensure that we maintain turnover and refreshment, particularly in the absence of performance management – some groups referred in particular to the importance of bringing in people with new and dynamic ideas and of inter-generational fairness

Several groups were surprised that some staff seek successive extensions and felt that the EJRA is particularly important in cases in which individuals wish to stay for many years beyond the EJRA

Surprise was expressed at the high level of approvals for applications for extensions – there was concern that this might have the effect of undermining the EJRA and that this is not widely known, leading to misconceptions that many colleagues are being prevented from working beyond their EJRA

The EJRA might be having a negative impact upon recruitment and retention in some areas (Philosophy, Economics, NDPH were specific examples given), particularly when trying to attract academic staff from areas that do not have an EJRA, like the US; MSD felt this particularly strongly

P.7

Annexe B

We must ensure that our procedures do not make people feel ‘pushed out’ or otherwise undervalued at this stage of their careers

There needs to be a viable alternative for those who want to continue to work but to whom employment and/or salary are not important

Data to demonstrate whether the policy has a disproportionate impact upon women, particularly those who have taken time out of their careers for caring responsibilities and thus have a smaller pension, would be welcome

There may have been a shift in perception of the EJRA since it was introduced in 2011 because people have seen how it works in practice and are increasingly concerned about shifting demographics and the reducing value of pensions.

Division-specific concerns and views

Young academics are moving to other institutions in order to achieve career progression (GLAM)

The EJRA is particularly important to allow effective succession planning (GLAM)

The absence of an EJRA at some other universities is causing huge frustration, as it limits attempts to refresh the workforce (GLAM)

Any future EJRA exceptions process should provide sufficient flexibility to allow for short-term extensions for those due to retire prior to REF/TEF census dates (while recognising that any exceptions process might need to be more stringent in future in order that the policy should have effect) (Humanities)

Any future criteria for exceptions should not be formulated so as to make it impossible for those who do not work in areas where large grants are available to make a successful application (Humanities and Social Sciences)

We should be able to retain in employment those who attract large grants that create employment opportunities for others and actually benefit the careers of younger colleagues (MSD)

A lot of effort – centrally and in departments - is being put into operating a policy which appears to make little difference to how many people retire at the EJRA (MPLS)

Cases which are turned down or go to appeal cause a great deal of bad feeling in departments and make life very difficult for the Head of Department and management board (MPLS and Social Sciences)

The current focus on funding might be seen as a form of performance management (MPLS)

The current system makes it difficult to manage the grant application process – should the application to the EJRA Committee or to the grant awarding body come first? If the grant has been awarded, it places pressure on the Committee to agree the extension, but the six-monthly meetings do not always fit well with grant application timetables. In some areas, staff do not always discuss applications with the Head of Department before submission (MPLS)

P.8

Annexe C

Feedback on the EJRA from retired staff

Academic Research Admin & Prof Total Of which women

How many were surveyed? 84 56 29 169 45 (27% of those surveyed)

How many responded? 28 11 18 57 20 (35% of respondents)

How many were aware of the EJRA? 24 (86%) 9 (82%) 15 (83%) 48 (84%) 18 (90% of the 20 female respondents)

How many discussed retirement plans with manager / HoD (or were offered the chance to do so but declined)?

9 (32%) 2 (18%) 7 (39%) 18 (32%) 5 (25% of the 20 female respondents)

In the absence of an EJRA, how many would have continued working?

6 (21%) 6 (55%) 2 (11%) 14 (25%) 4 (20% of the 20 female respondents)

If yes, how long for? (average in years) 3 years 3 years 2-3 years 3 years 3 years (2yrs – indefinitely)

How many chose to provide extra comment 14 5 4 23 10

Free-form comments

Respondents were invited to make any comments on the EJRA they wished. 23 chose to do so. Some comments were lengthy; they are summarised below.

Academic Research Admin & Prof Total

Support EJRA 8 2 2 12 (21% of the 57 respondents)

Does not support EJRA 3 1 1 5 (9% of the 57 respondents)

Neutral / mixed views 3 2 1 6 (11% of the 57 respondents)

Those who support the EJRA do so because: it is needed for refreshment; it supports career progression for early career academics and others (6); they are

concerned about declining performance and /or the difficulties of dismissing such colleagues by other routes (2); the ‘American predicament’ should be

avoided (2); they see alternative ways for those over the EJRA to contribute, without ‘blocking’ a post (2).

Those who do not support the EJRA take that view because: they want to work longer to improve their pension (2); they would have liked to continue

working, full- or part-time; they consider it to be illegal (2); they object to the manner of the EJRA’s introduction or management (2); devalues the

contribution of those near retirement; they do not consider it to be an appropriate way of tackling performance problems; the University is less able to

recruit top academics, especially those form the US as a result of the EJRA.

The following comments were also provided: those above the EJRA still have much to offer; the EJRA should be at 70, to take account of demographics; it

should not be too easy to get approval to work beyond the EJRA; the VC’s comments about the quality of our staff raises the question of why the EJRA is

needed; people should be able to apply for professorial title as emeriti; the EJRA is discredited if vacated posts are held vacant due to lack of funds.

P.9

Annexe C

P.10

Q1 1. What is your employment status? Answered: 196 Skipped: 1

Employed solely by th...

Employed jointly by t...

Employed solely by an...

Retired

Postgraduate

Other

Other (please specify below)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Answer Choices Responses Employed solely by the University of Oxford 56.12% 110

Employed jointly by the University of Oxford and an Oxford College 25.00% 49

Employed solely by an Oxford College 6.63% 13

Retired 6.12% 12

Postgraduate 0.51% 1

Other 0.00% 0

Other (please specify below) 5.61% 11

Total 196

Oxford UCU Survey - EJRA Michaelmas Term 2016 Annexe D

1 / 8 P.11

Academic

Academic-relate d (including...

Retired

Postgraduate

Other (please specify below)

Q2 2. What is your staff category? Answered: 197 Skipped: 0

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Answer Choices Responses Academic 54.31% 107

Academic-related (including research, library, computing, administrative and other professional staff) 39.09% 77

Retired 3.55% 7

Postgraduate 0.51% 1

Other (please specify below) 2.54% 5

Total 197


2 / 8 P.12

Q3 What is your age group? Answered: 197 Skipped: 0

29 or under

30 - 39

40 - 49

50 - 59

60 - 69

70 or over

Prefer not to say

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Answer Choices Responses 29 or under 2.03% 4

30 - 39 15.23% 30

40 - 49 21.83% 43

50 - 59 34.01% 67

60 - 69 22.84% 45

70 or over 3.55% 7

Prefer not to say 0.51% 1

Total 197


3 / 8 P.13

Yes

No

No comment

Q4 3. Are you in favour of an EJRA for academic staff?

Answered: 179 Skipped: 18

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

Answer Choices Responses Yes 59.22% 106

No 35.75% 64

No comment 5.03% 9

Total 179


4 / 8 P.14

Q5 4. Are you in favour of an EJRA for academic-related staff?


Yes

No

No comment

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


No 36.67% 66

No comment 8.89% 16

Total 180


5 / 8 P.15

Q6 5. Do you believe that the EJRA covers the appropriate staff groups?


Yes

No

No comment

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


No 21.47% 38

No comment 40.11% 71

Total 177


6 / 8 P.16

Q7 6. Do you believe that the EJRA is achieving the University's Aims stated

here ? Answered: 177 Skipped: 20

Yes

No

No comment

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


No 38.42% 68

No comment 20.34% 36

Total 177


7 / 8 P.17

Q8 7. Do you believe that the EJRA is appropriately set at the 30th September

before an individual's 68th birthday? Answered: 180 Skipped: 17

Yes

No - it should be lower

No - it should be higher

No comment

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


No - it should be lower 11.67% 21

No - it should be higher 37.22% 67

No comment 7.22% 13

Total 180


8 / 8 P.18

Annexe E

Volume% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirements

Under 55 5 6% 3 5% 8 6% 5 8% 2 3% 2 3% 2 2% 0 0% 27 4%

55 - 59 2 3% 8 13% 22 17% 5 8% 3 5% 5 7% 13 13% 7 8% 65 10%

60 - 61 10 13% 11 17% 25 19% 7 11% 12 19% 13 18% 14 14% 8 10% 100 15%

62 - 63 9 11% 9 14% 23 18% 5 8% 11 18% 10 14% 7 7% 14 17% 88 13%

64 - 65 16 20% 18 29% 27 21% 24 36% 16 26% 15 21% 18 18% 20 24% 154 23%

66 - 67 34 43% 12 19% 21 16% 17 26% 18 29% 19 27% 36 36% 30 36% 187 28%

68 + 4 5% 2 3% 5 4% 3 5% 0 0% 7 10% 11 11% 5 6% 37 6%

Total 80 100% 63 100% 131 100% 66 100% 62 100% 71 100% 101 100% 84 100% 658 100%

Volume% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirements

Under 55 57 6% 79 6% 87 6% 65 5% 36 4% 32 3% 29 3% 6 1% 391 5%

55 - 59 121 12% 220 18% 287 20% 210 17% 172 19% 149 15% 159 16% 134 15% 1452 17%

60 - 61 258 26% 296 24% 297 21% 268 21% 209 23% 257 26% 217 22% 219 25% 2021 23%

62 - 63 131 13% 186 15% 246 17% 217 17% 139 16% 158 16% 151 15% 165 19% 1393 16%

64 - 65 312 32% 339 27% 377 26% 370 29% 238 27% 212 21% 232 23% 199 23% 2279 26%

66 - 67 82 8% 100 8% 115 8% 106 8% 79 9% 148 15% 178 18% 109 12% 917 11%

68 + 16 2% 13 1% 22 2% 29 2% 17 2% 43 4% 42 4% 49 6% 231 3%

Total 977 100% 1233 100% 1431 100% 1265 100% 890 100% 999 100% 1008 100% 881 100% 8684 100%

Volume% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirementsVolume

% of

retirements

Under 55 41 5% 77 7% 61 5% 64 6% 28 4% 28 4% 22 2% 17 2% 338 5%

55 - 59 110 14% 157 15% 178 16% 220 21% 137 19% 137 19% 176 19% 192 20% 1307 18%

60 - 61 214 27% 266 26% 280 25% 234 22% 180 25% 168 24% 219 23% 233 24% 1794 24%

62 - 63 116 15% 182 17% 184 17% 175 16% 127 17% 114 16% 148 16% 177 18% 1223 17%

64 - 65 222 28% 282 27% 286 26% 281 26% 181 25% 175 25% 209 22% 190 19% 1826 25%

66 - 67 70 9% 69 7% 93 8% 70 7% 51 7% 64 9% 126 13% 104 11% 647 9%

68 + 7 1% 8 1% 29 3% 28 3% 23 3% 20 3% 48 5% 66 7% 229 3%

Total 780 100% 1041 100% 1111 100% 1072 100% 727 100% 706 100% 948 100% 979 100% 7364 100%

2014 2015 Total

All other University (all Russell Group institutions excluded) Retirees- Age profile by year

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Total

2012 2013

2012 2013

SUMMARY OF RETIREES BY AGE AND YEAR 2008 - 2015

University of Oxford Retirees- Age profile by year

2008 2009 2010 2011

2008 2009 2010 2011

2014 2015 Total

Russell Group (excluding University of Oxford) Retirees- Age profile by year

2014 2015

P.19

Notes on the data providedData Source Details EJRA Specific Data Items

Staff in Post (SiP)

31 July each year

31 July snapshots of all employees in Medical

Sciences, Social Sciences, MPLS, Humanities,

Continuing Education, ASUC and UAS used for

Staffing Figures and other reporting requirements

e.g. committee papers, Athena SWAN and surveys.

EJRA Grade Groups:

Based on Grade (and Staff Classification where

grades 9-10+ and 6-8 are split between 'Academic

and Research' and 'Other').

Based on appointment grade at Date Left.

Data Origin: OPENdoor (2006-2011) and Core Personnel (2012 onwards)

Date range covered: 2006 – 2015

Update frequency: Annually (Sept/Oct)

Does not include non-employees e.g. college-only

staff, casual and agency workers.

Based on appointment grade at snapshot date.

Does not include Variable Hours employees as

these records are not available pre 2012.

EJRA Age Categories:

Based on age in whole years at report snapshot

date.

Leavers

Employees who left the University between 1 August and 31 July each year:

e.g. 2015 = leavers between 1 August 2014 and 31 July 2015 inclusive.

Date range covered: 2006 – 2015

Update frequency: Annually (Sept/Oct)

Does not include transfers between departments

within the University.

EJRA Grade Groups:

Based on Grade (and Staff Classification for the

split between 'Academic and Research' and 'Other'

in the groups for grades 9-10+ and 6-8).

Based on appointment grade at Date Left.

Data Origin: OPENdoor (2006-2011) and Core Personnel (2012 onwards)

Based on appointment grade at snapshot date.

Does not include Variable Hours employees as

these records are not available pre 2012.

EJRA Age Categories:

Based on age in whole years at their date of

leaving.

EJRA Leaving Reason Group:Based on Appointment Leaving Reason; aggregate

grouping into ‘retirement’ and ‘other’ reasons for

leaving.

Terminology

Contents

Overview Staff in Post*

Actual and Percentage Year on Year Change in EJRA Population by Legal Sex

Overview by Age Band

EJRA Detailed Age Category and Legal Sex*

EJRA Population Leavers

Average Age on Retirement*

Ethnicity Views

Disability Views

*Data views included in initial data pack for the Working Party

Provides an overview of EJRA population leavers by leaving reason of retirement by average age at the

point of leaving University employment. Shown as a single population, and then disaggregated by 'EJRA

Group': Statutory Professors, RSIVs, Associate Professors, Grades 9-10+ (disaggregated) and Grades 6-8

(disaggregated).

Provides an overview of the EJRA population numbers by Ethnicity summary and shown disaggregated

by 'EJRA Group': Statutory Professors, RSIVs, Associate Professors, Grades 9-10+ and Grades 6-8.

Provides an overview of EJRA population leavers by Ethnicity summary and leaving reason (grouped

into 'retirement' and 'other'). Compares the proportions of each ethnicity group by leaving reason

(grouped into 'retirement' and 'other').

Provides an overview of the EJRA population numbers by Disability summary and shown disaggregated

by 'EJRA Group': Statutory Professors, RSIVs, Associate Professors, Grades 9-10+ and Grades 6-8.

Provides an overview of EJRA population leavers by Disability summary and leaving reason (grouped

into 'retirement' and 'other'). Compares the proportions of each disability group by leaving reason

(grouped into 'retirement' and 'other').

Data for the EJRA Working Party (June 2016)

Provides an overview of all employees subject to the EJRA by legal sex and year, as a single population,

and then disaggregated by 'EJRA Group': Statutory Professors, RSIVs, Associate Professors, Grades 9-10+

and Grades 6-8.

Provides an overview of the change in EJRA population numbers with focus on the changes in the

proportion of female employees. Shown as a single population, and then disaggregated by 'EJRA

Group': Statutory Professors, RSIVs, Associate Professors, Grades 9-10+ and Grades 6-8.

Provides an overview of the EJRA population numbers by Age Band. Shown as a single population, and

shown disaggregated by 'EJRA Group': Statutory Professors, RSIVs, Associate Professors, Grades 9-10+

and Grades 6-8.

Provides a more detailed view of the EJRA population by age and year.

Provides an overview of EJRA population leavers by leaving reason (grouped into 'retirement' and

'other'). Shown as a single population, and then disaggregated by 'EJRA Group': Statutory Professors,

RSIVs, Associate Professors, Grades 9-10+ (disaggregated) and Grades 6-8 (disaggregated).

EJRA Population

All those employees currently subject to the Employer Justified Retirement Age (EJRA): those with

contracts of employment in grades 6 and above.

Annexe F

1 P.21

Overview Staff in Post

Overall EJRA Population by Legal Sex and Year

% Count Sex Count Sex31 July Female Male 31 July Female Male2006 39.9% 60.1% 2006 2,277 3,4282007 41.5% 58.5% 2007 2,581 3,6372008 42.8% 57.2% 2008 2,849 3,8142009 43.8% 56.2% 2009 3,139 4,0292010 44.2% 55.8% 2010 3,290 4,1572011 44.7% 55.3% 2011 3,377 4,1802012 45.0% 55.0% 2012 3,600 4,3932013 45.8% 54.2% 2013 3,963 4,6902014 45.9% 54.1% 2014 4,289 5,0622015 46.4% 53.6% 2015 4,582 5,296

Source: Core Personnel and OPENdoor

Overall EJRA Population by Legal Sex, Year and Group

Statutory Professors by Legal Sex and Year

% Count Sex Count Sex31 July Female Male 31 July Female Male2006 10.1% 89.9% 2006 23 2042007 8.8% 91.2% 2007 21 2182008 10.1% 89.9% 2008 25 2222009 9.8% 90.2% 2009 23 2122010 10.3% 89.7% 2010 24 2102011 11.1% 88.9% 2011 27 2162012 11.6% 88.4% 2012 29 2222013 10.8% 89.2% 2013 27 2242014 11.5% 88.5% 2014 30 2302015 13.7% 86.3% 2015 34 214

RSIVs by Legal Sex and Year


EJRA Implementation 0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

% H

eadc

ount

Snapshot at 31 July

All EJRA staff by percentage of legal sex Female Male

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

% H

eadc

ount

Snapshot at 31 July

Statutory Professors by percentage of legal sex Female Male

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

% H

eadc

ount

Snapshot at 31 July

RSIVs by percentage of legal sex Female Male

2 P.22

Overview Staff in Post

Associate Professors by Legal Sex and Year


Grades 9 - 10+ by Legal Sex and Year


Grades 6 - 8 by Legal Sex and Year

Count of PerRef/EmpID-PostNoSex Count Sex31 July Female Male 31 July Female Male2006 47.8% 52.2% 2006 1,675 1,8282007 49.3% 50.7% 2007 1,957 2,0152008 50.6% 49.4% 2008 2,172 2,1222009 51.2% 48.8% 2009 2,428 2,3152010 51.3% 48.7% 2010 2,544 2,4192011 51.4% 48.6% 2011 2,580 2,4442012 51.4% 48.6% 2012 2,761 2,6102013 52.3% 47.7% 2013 3,038 2,7742014 52.2% 47.8% 2014 3,311 3,0342015 52.3% 47.7% 2015 3,532 3,224

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015%

Hea

dcou

ntSnapshot at 31 July

Associate Professors by percentage of legal sex Female Male

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

% H

eadc

ount

Snapshot at 31 July

Staff in grades 9 - 10+ by percentage of legal sex Female Male

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

% H

eadc

ount

Snapshot at 31 July

Staff in grades 6 - 8 by percentage of legal sex Female Male

3 P.23

Change in Population

Actual and Percentage Year on Year Change in EJRA Population by Legal Sex

Actual change Sex

% Change from previous year

31 July Female Male Total 31 July Female Male Total2006 20062007 304 209 513 2007 13.4% 6.1% 9.0%2008 268 177 445 2008 10.4% 4.9% 7.2%2009 290 215 505 2009 10.2% 5.6% 7.6%2010 151 128 279 2010 4.8% 3.2% 3.9%2011 87 23 110 2011 2.6% 0.6% 1.5%2012 223 213 436 2012 6.6% 5.1% 5.8%2013 363 297 660 2013 10.1% 6.8% 8.3%2014 326 372 698 2014 8.2% 7.9% 8.1%2015 293 234 527 2015 6.8% 4.6% 5.6%


Actual and Percentage Year on Year Change in EJRA Population by Legal Sex and Group

Actual ChangeSex % Change from previous year31 July Female Male Grand Total 31 July Female Male Total2006 20062007 -2 14 12 2007 -8.7% 6.9% 5.3%2008 4 4 8 2008 19.0% 1.8% 3.3%2009 -2 -10 -12 2009 -8.0% -4.5% -4.9%2010 1 -2 -1 2010 4.3% -0.9% -0.4%2011 3 6 9 2011 12.5% 2.9% 3.8%2012 2 6 8 2012 7.4% 2.8% 3.3%2013 -2 2 0 2013 -6.9% 0.9% 0.0%2014 3 6 9 2014 11.1% 2.7% 3.6%2015 4 -16 -12 2015 13.3% -7.0% -4.6%

Actual Change Sex


31 July Female Male Grand Total 31 July Female Male Total2006 20062007 3 14 17 2007 20.0% 42.4% 35.4%2008 4 21 25 2008 22.2% 44.7% 38.5%2009 7 11 18 2009 31.8% 16.2% 20.0%2010 0 3 3 2010 0.0% 3.8% 2.8%2011 2 2 4 2011 6.9% 2.4% 3.6%2012 4 18 22 2012 12.9% 21.4% 19.1%2013 4 23 27 2013 11.4% 22.5% 19.7%2014 8 23 31 2014 20.5% 18.4% 18.9%2015 4 9 13 2015 8.5% 6.1% 6.7%

EJRA Implementation

13.4%10.4% 10.2%

4.8% 2.6% 6.6%10.1% 8.2%

6.8%

-10.0%

-5.0%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge C

hang

e

Snapshot at 31 July

Percentage change of Female and Total EJRA PopulationFemale Total

-8.7%

19.0%

-8.0%

4.3%

12.5%

7.4%

-6.9%

11.1%13.3%

-10.0%

-5.0%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge C

hang

e

Snapshot at 31 July

Percentage change of Female Statutory Professors and Total Statutory Professors

Female Total

20.0%22.2%

31.8%

0.0%

6.9%

12.9%11.4%

20.5%

8.5%

-10.0%

-5.0%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge C

hang

e

Snapshot at 31 July

Percentage change of Female RSIVs and Total RSIVs Female Total

4 P.24

Change in Population

Actual Change Sex


31 July Female Male Grand Total 31 July Female Male Total2006 20062007 -13 -43 -56 2007 -4.6% -4.9% -4.8%2008 15 8 23 2008 5.5% 1.0% 2.1%2009 -7 -14 -21 2009 -2.4% -1.7% -1.9%2010 10 2 12 2010 3.6% 0.2% 1.1%2011 -1 -33 -34 2011 -0.3% -4.0% -3.0%2012 -4 -12 -16 2012 -1.4% -1.5% -1.5%2013 23 24 47 2013 8.1% 3.1% 4.4%2014 17 41 58 2014 5.5% 5.1% 5.2%2015 5 4 9 2015 1.5% 0.5% 0.8%

Actual Change Sex



Actual Change Sex



-4.6%

5.5%

-2.4%

3.6%

-0.3%-1.4%

8.1%

5.5% 1.5%

-10.0%

-5.0%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge C

hang

e

Snapshot at 31 July

Percentage change of Female Associate Professors and Total Associate Professors Female Total

12.2%

9.6%

10.5%

6.3%

11.7%

8.9%

12.4%

4.5%

10.2%

-10.0%

-5.0%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge C

hang

e

Snapshot at 31 July

Percentage change of Female Grades 9-10+ and Total Grades 9-10+ Female Total

16.8%

11.0%11.8%

4.8%1.4%

7.0% 10.0% 9.0%6.7%

-10.0%

-5.0%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Percentage change of Female Grades 6 - 8 and Total Grades 6 - 8 Female Total

5 P.25

Population by Age Band

Overview of EJRA Population by Age Band EJRA Implementation


Overview of EJRA Population by Age Band and Group

12.4% 12.7% 12.5% 12.1% 11.6%10.4% 10.8% 10.7% 10.7% 10.7%

35.3%36.4% 36.6%

37.4%38.3% 38.2% 37.8% 38.3%

39.6% 39.6%

25.5%24.3% 24.4% 24.6% 24.9%

25.9% 25.5% 25.2% 24.5% 24.4%

18.8% 18.5% 18.1% 17.4% 17.4% 18.0% 18.4% 18.1% 17.7% 18.1%

6.1% 6.1% 6.4% 6.6% 5.9% 5.6% 5.6% 5.3% 5.2% 5.1%

1.9% 2.0% 1.9% 1.8% 1.9% 2.0% 2.0% 2.3% 2.3% 2.2%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge o

f EJR

A Po

pula

tion

Snapshot at 31 July

Proportion of the EJRA Population by Age Band Under 30 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 59 60 to 64 65+

2.6% 3.3%2.4% 1.7% 1.3% 1.6% 1.6% 1.2% 1.5% 1.6%

18.1%

15.5% 15.0% 15.7%17.5% 17.7%

18.7% 19.1%

16.5%15.7%

48.0% 48.1% 47.8% 47.2%

43.2% 42.8% 43.0%

40.6%41.5%

44.0%

20.7%22.6%

26.3% 26.4% 26.5% 27.2%

23.1%24.7%

27.3% 26.6%

10.6% 10.5%

8.5% 8.9%

11.5%10.7%

13.5%14.3%

13.1%12.1%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge o

f St

atut

ory

Prof

esso

rs

Snapshot at 31 July

Proportion of Statutory Professors by Age Band 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 59 60 to 64 65+

6 P.26


4.2%

6.2% 5.6%6.5%

5.4%

1.7% 2.2% 2.4% 2.1% 2.4%

29.2% 29.2%28.9%

33.3%31.5%

30.4%

28.5%27.4%

26.2%25.0%

35.4%

27.7%

32.2%

29.6%

35.1%

40.0%38.7%

37.2%

42.1%

44.2%

18.8%

21.5%

18.9% 18.5% 18.0% 17.4% 17.5%

15.9% 14.9%15.9%

12.5%

15.4%14.4%

12.0%

9.9% 10.4%

13.1%

17.1%

14.9%

12.5%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge o

f RSI

Vs

Snapshot at 31 July

Proportion of RSIVs by Age Band 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 59 60 to 64 65+

2.3%0.9% 0.4% 0.3% 0.2% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.3% 0.1%

23.1%21.3% 21.9%

19.9% 20.2%18.4% 18.3%

20.7%22.5% 22.2%

34.0%34.9% 34.8%

37.0% 36.9%38.7% 38.9%

37.8%36.6% 35.9%

25.2%26.7% 26.5% 26.5% 26.8%

28.0%28.8% 28.5% 27.8%

29.3%

11.1% 11.1% 11.3% 11.6% 11.0% 10.2% 10.0%8.9% 9.0% 8.5%

4.3% 5.1% 5.0% 4.7% 5.0% 4.3% 3.6% 3.7% 3.8% 4.0%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge o

f Ass

ocia

te P

rofe

ssor

s

Snapshot at 31 July

Proportion of Associate Professors by Age Band Under 30 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 59 60 to 64 65+

7 P.27


2.0%

1.6% 1.6% 1.3% 1.4% 1.2% 1.0% 1.1% 0.9% 0.9%

31.2%

32.7%33.5% 32.1%

31.9%30.1% 30.4% 30.1% 30.3% 30.0%

31.9%

30.1% 29.7%31.0%

32.4%34.5%

31.6%32.7% 32.9% 32.8%

26.7% 26.6%

24.5%23.5% 23.3% 23.2%

25.5% 25.4% 26.0% 26.1%

6.4% 6.8%7.9%

9.2%8.3% 7.8% 8.0%

7.0% 6.3% 5.9%

1.8%2.3% 2.9% 2.8% 2.7% 3.2% 3.4% 3.6% 3.6% 4.1%

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge o

f gra

des 9

-10+

Snapshot at 31 July

Proportion of grades 9-10+ by Age Band Under 30 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 59 60 to 64 65+

19.0% 19.2% 19.0%18.0%

17.1%15.3% 15.7% 15.6% 15.5% 15.4%

42.8%43.8% 43.8%

45.1%46.2% 46.8%

45.9% 46.2%47.6% 47.2%

21.7%20.7% 20.9% 20.7% 20.8%

21.6% 21.7% 21.3% 20.7% 20.8%

12.8% 12.6% 12.6% 12.3% 12.5% 13.0% 13.1% 12.9% 12.3% 12.6%

3.3% 3.3% 3.4% 3.6% 3.1% 2.7% 3.0% 3.1% 3.1% 3.2%

0.4% 0.4% 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% 0.6% 0.6% 0.9% 0.9% 0.7%0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

30.0%

35.0%

40.0%

45.0%

50.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge g

rade

s 6-8

Snapshot at 31 July

Proportion of grades 6-8 by Age Band Under 30 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 59 60 to 64 65+

8 P.28

Age Category - detail

EJRA Detailed Age Category and Legal Sex

Count 31 July Sex2006 2006 Total 2007 2007 Total 2008 2008 Total 2009 2009 Total 2010 2010 Total 2011 2011 Total 2012 2012 Total 2013 2013 Total 2014 2014 Total 2015 2015 Total

Detailed Age Category Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female MaleUnder 30 323 383 706 387 400 787 441 393 834 451 418 869 436 429 865 391 394 785 424 437 861 484 443 927 513 483 996 525 531 1,056

30 to 39 868 1,147 2,015 1,008 1,253 2,261 1,110 1,331 2,441 1,250 1,433 2,683 1,345 1,506 2,851 1,378 1,508 2,886 1,445 1,575 3,020 1,582 1,734 3,316 1,736 1,971 3,707 1,842 2,065 3,907

40 to 49 580 873 1,453 625 889 1,514 693 930 1,623 771 995 1,766 796 1,056 1,852 864 1,096 1,960 923 1,113 2,036 1,016 1,166 2,182 1,099 1,192 2,291 1,183 1,227 2,410

50 to 59 390 683 1,073 439 713 1,152 472 736 1,208 513 736 1,249 564 731 1,295 580 778 1,358 616 853 1,469 658 906 1,564 703 951 1,654 778 1,010 1,788

60 22 59 81 25 72 97 28 78 106 35 80 115 34 66 100 39 55 94 50 57 107 45 65 110 47 77 124 47 73 120

61 20 65 85 23 61 84 22 73 95 28 76 104 33 68 101 31 64 95 36 50 86 43 54 97 42 64 106 46 78 124

62 12 58 70 20 63 83 23 60 83 23 70 93 24 68 92 30 56 86 27 64 91 35 54 89 40 52 92 39 63 102

63 16 41 57 12 53 65 21 61 82 22 60 82 16 64 80 21 60 81 28 53 81 28 62 90 33 49 82 38 48 86

64 14 42 56 12 37 49 13 50 63 19 57 76 17 53 70 11 53 64 21 58 79 26 49 75 23 63 86 27 44 71

65 22 35 57 11 38 49 8 34 42 11 42 53 9 45 54 16 39 55 10 52 62 18 56 74 21 43 64 20 53 73

66 7 17 24 12 32 44 7 30 37 3 27 30 8 31 39 5 31 36 8 21 29 10 36 46 17 47 64 15 37 52

67 3 19 22 7 17 24 8 24 32 6 17 23 2 24 26 4 25 29 5 28 33 9 20 29 5 29 34 12 32 44

68 1 1 4 4 3 7 10 3 11 14 2 4 6 2 11 13 1 14 15 2 16 18 5 11 16 2 11 13

69 2 2 1 1 3 3 3 5 8 1 6 7 1 3 4 2 9 11 1 12 13 1 11 12 4 6 10

70 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 7 1 3 4 1 2 3 2 8 10 11 11 1 6 7

71 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 2 3 1 3 4 2 5 7 8 8

72 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 1 2 2 2 4

73 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1

74 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

75 2 2 1 1 1 1

76 2 2 1 1

77 1 1 2 2

78 1 1

79 1 1

80 1 1

85 1 1

86 1 1

Grand Total 2,277 3,428 5,705 2,581 3,637 6,218 2,849 3,814 6,663 3,139 4,029 7,168 3,290 4,157 7,447 3,377 4,180 7,557 3,600 4,393 7,993 3,963 4,690 8,653 4,289 5,062 9,351 4,582 5,296 9,878

EJRA Population by Age Category, Legal Sex and Group

Count 31 July Sex2006 2006 Total 2007 2007 Total 2008 2008 Total 2009 2009 Total 2010 2010 Total 2011 2011 Total 2012 2012 Total 2013 2013 Total 2014 2014 Total 2015 2015 Total

EJRA_GradeGroup1 EJRA_AgeCats2 Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Male

Statutory Professors 30 to 39 6 6 8 8 6 6 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4

40 to 49 4 37 41 4 33 37 6 31 37 5 32 37 6 35 41 7 36 43 6 41 47 5 43 48 6 37 43 7 32 39

50 to 59 10 99 109 12 103 115 13 105 118 12 99 111 13 88 101 13 91 104 14 94 108 11 91 102 11 97 108 14 95 109

60 to 67 9 61 70 5 71 76 6 77 83 5 75 80 5 83 88 7 83 90 9 77 86 11 80 91 13 87 100 13 76 89

68 to 70 1 1 3 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 2 2 6 6 7 7 4 4 6 6

71 + 1 1 1 1 1 1

Statutory Professors Total 23 204 227 21 218 239 25 222 247 23 212 235 24 210 234 27 216 243 29 222 251 27 224 251 30 230 260 34 214 248

RSIV 30 to 39 1 1 2 4 4 5 5 1 6 7 2 4 6 2 2 1 2 3 1 3 4 4 4 5 5

40 to 49 4 10 14 6 13 19 6 20 26 7 29 36 5 30 35 7 28 35 6 33 39 6 39 45 9 42 51 8 44 52

50 to 59 6 11 17 6 12 18 10 19 29 12 20 32 14 25 39 14 32 46 15 38 53 16 45 61 23 59 82 28 64 92

60 to 67 4 10 14 6 16 22 5 18 23 6 17 23 7 17 24 9 16 25 13 20 33 16 31 47 13 35 48 13 36 49

68 to 70 1 1 1 1 1 4 5 3 7 10 1 4 5 4 4 6 6 5 5 2 6 8 2 4 6

71 + 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 4 4

RSIV Total 15 33 48 18 47 65 22 68 90 29 79 108 29 82 111 31 84 115 35 102 137 39 125 164 47 148 195 51 157 208

Associate Professor Under 30 8 19 27 5 5 10 4 1 5 3 3 2 2 1 3 4 2 2 4 1 3 4 3 3 1 1

30 to 39 86 183 269 79 157 236 91 157 248 77 144 221 78 148 226 71 129 200 63 133 196 77 154 231 86 179 265 85 178 263

40 to 49 94 300 394 88 298 386 94 299 393 104 306 410 102 312 414 110 311 421 116 301 417 119 304 423 125 305 430 123 303 426

50 to 59 62 231 293 68 228 296 73 226 299 67 227 294 78 222 300 74 230 304 75 233 308 74 245 319 78 249 327 86 261 347

60 to 67 35 145 180 32 146 178 24 158 182 28 151 179 29 147 176 33 123 156 29 117 146 37 102 139 36 113 149 36 109 145

68 to 70 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3

Associate Professor Total 285 878 1,163 272 835 1,107 287 843 1,130 280 829 1,109 290 831 1,121 289 798 1,087 285 786 1,071 308 810 1,118 325 851 1,176 330 855 1,185

Grades 9-10+ Under 30 7 8 15 6 7 13 5 9 14 3 10 13 7 7 14 4 9 13 5 7 12 5 10 15 4 8 12 6 8 14

30 to 39 94 144 238 106 167 273 124 178 302 131 181 312 132 193 325 144 184 328 156 198 354 171 223 394 168 248 416 183 262 445

40 to 49 87 157 244 96 155 251 102 166 268 119 183 302 134 196 330 164 211 375 166 202 368 194 234 428 214 238 452 234 252 486

50 to 59 74 130 204 84 138 222 83 138 221 93 136 229 96 141 237 102 150 252 123 173 296 140 192 332 148 210 358 162 225 387

60 to 67 17 44 61 21 52 73 28 65 93 32 76 108 32 72 104 33 74 107 36 78 114 35 80 115 38 79 117 44 88 132

68 to 70 2 2 1 1 1 2 3 1 7 8 2 6 8 2 8 10 3 12 15 3 15 18 2 13 15 4 5 9

71 + 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 3 4 3 3 6 2 3 5 2 6 8

Grades 9-10+ Total 279 485 764 313 522 835 343 559 902 379 594 973 403 615 1,018 450 638 1,088 490 673 1,163 551 757 1,308 576 799 1,375 635 846 1,481

Grades 6-8 Under 30 308 356 664 376 388 764 432 383 815 445 408 853 427 422 849 386 382 768 417 428 845 478 430 908 509 472 981 519 522 1,041

30 to 39 687 813 1,500 823 917 1,740 895 985 1,880 1,041 1,098 2,139 1,133 1,158 2,291 1,163 1,189 2,352 1,225 1,238 2,463 1,333 1,351 2,684 1,482 1,536 3,018 1,574 1,616 3,190

40 to 49 391 369 760 431 390 821 485 414 899 536 445 981 549 483 1,032 576 510 1,086 629 536 1,165 692 546 1,238 745 570 1,315 811 596 1,407

50 to 59 238 212 450 269 232 501 293 248 541 329 254 583 363 255 618 377 275 652 389 315 704 417 333 750 443 336 779 488 365 853

60 to 67 51 76 127 58 88 146 67 92 159 76 110 186 70 100 170 75 87 162 98 91 189 115 103 218 128 110 238 138 119 257

68 to 70 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 2 1 3 1 1 2 2 7 9 2 8 10 1 5 6

71 + 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 5 2 2 4 1 1 2

Grades 6-8 Total 1,675 1,828 3,503 1,957 2,015 3,972 2,172 2,122 4,294 2,428 2,315 4,743 2,544 2,419 4,963 2,580 2,444 5,024 2,761 2,610 5,371 3,038 2,774 5,812 3,311 3,034 6,345 3,532 3,224 6,756

Default Retirement / EJRA

Proposed EJRA change

9 P.29

Leavers detail

Overview of EJRA Population Leavers

Count EJRA_LeavingReasonGroup Count EJRA_LeavingReasonGroupReport Year Retirement Other Grand Total Report Year Retirement Other Grand Total2006 54 833 887 2006 6.1% 93.9% 100.0%2007 64 789 853 2007 7.5% 92.5% 100.0%2008 68 953 1,021 2008 6.7% 93.3% 100.0%2009 73 933 1,006 2009 7.3% 92.7% 100.0%2010 80 999 1,079 2010 7.4% 92.6% 100.0%2011 85 1,113 1,198 2011 7.1% 92.9% 100.0%

2012 92 1,122 1,214 2012 7.6% 92.4% 100.0%2013 81 1,139 1,220 2013 6.6% 93.4% 100.0%2014 89 1,208 1,297 2014 6.9% 93.1% 100.0%2015 94 1,376 1,470 2015 6.4% 93.6% 100.0%

6.1% 7.5% 6.7% 7.3% 7.4% 7.1% 7.6% 6.6% 6.9% 6.4%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge o

f Lea

vers

Date Left (August - July)

All EJRA Population Leavers by Reason Other

Retirement

10 P.30

Leavers detail

EJRA Population Leavers by Group and Reason

Count EJRA_LeavingReasonGroupEJRA_GradeGroup1ReportYear Retirement Other Grand Total EJRA_GradeGroup1ReportYear Retirement Other

Statutory Professors2006 6 8 14 Statutory Professors2006 42.9% 57.1%2007 4 5 9 2007 44.4% 55.6%2008 11 3 14 2008 78.6% 21.4%2009 13 10 23 2009 56.5% 43.5%2010 9 8 17 2010 52.9% 47.1%2011 7 8 15 2011 46.7% 53.3%

2012 10 6 16 2012 62.5% 37.5%2013 7 5 12 2013 58.3% 41.7%2014 3 6 9 2014 33.3% 66.7%2015 19 5 24 2015 79.2% 20.8%

Count of PerRef-EmpNo-PostNo EJRA_LeavingReasonGroup ReportYear Retirement OtherEJRA_GradeGroup1ReportYear Retirement Other Grand Total 2006 33.3% 66.7%

RSIV 2006 2 4 6 2007 0.0% 100.0%2007 2 2 2008 33.3% 66.7%2008 2 4 6 2009 26.7% 73.3%2009 4 11 15 2010 28.6% 71.4%2010 2 5 7 2011 40.0% 60.0%

2011 6 9 15 2012 30.0% 70.0%

2012 3 7 10 2013 33.3% 66.7%2013 4 8 12 2014 56.3% 43.8%2014 9 7 16 2015 30.8% 69.2%

2015 4 9 13

42.9% 44.4%

78.6%

56.5%52.9%

46.7%

62.5%58.3%

33.3%

79.2%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge o

f Lea

vers


Statutory Professors by Leaver Reason Other

Retirement

33.3%

0.0%

33.3%

26.7% 28.6%

40.0%

30.0%33.3%

56.3%

30.8%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge o

f Lea

vers


RSIVs by Leaver Reason Other

Retirement

11 P.31

Leavers detail

Count EJRA_LeavingReasonGroupEJRA_GradeGroup1ReportYear Retirement Other Grand Total ReportYear Retirement Other

Associate Professor2006 22 63 85 2006 25.9% 74.1%2007 26 30 56 2007 46.4% 53.6%2008 21 32 53 2008 39.6% 60.4%2009 33 29 62 2009 53.2% 46.8%2010 27 18 45 2010 60.0% 40.0%2011 25 38 63 2011 39.7% 60.3%

2012 35 28 63 2012 55.6% 44.4%2013 23 22 45 2013 51.1% 48.9%2014 16 22 38 2014 42.1% 57.9%2015 24 20 44 2015 54.5% 45.5%


Grades 9-10+ 2006 4 63 67 2006 6.0% 94.0%2007 6 75 81 2007 7.4% 92.6%2008 5 69 74 2008 6.8% 93.2%2009 6 72 78 2009 7.7% 92.3%2010 3 77 80 2010 3.8% 96.3%2011 7 87 94 2011 7.4% 92.6%

2012 11 89 100 2012 11.0% 89.0%2013 10 76 86 2013 11.6% 88.4%2014 10 114 124 2014 8.1% 91.9%2015 5 109 114 2015 4.4% 95.6%

25.9%

46.4%39.6%

53.2%60.0%

39.7%

55.6%51.1%

42.1%

54.5%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge o

f Lea

vers


Associate Professors by Leaver Reason Other

Retirement

6.0% 7.4% 6.8% 7.7%3.8%

7.4%11.0% 11.6%

8.1%4.4%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge o

f Lea

vers


Academic and Research staff in grades 9-10+ by Leaver ReasonOther

Retirement

12 P.32

Leavers detail


Grades 9-10+ 2006 6 24 30 2006 20.0% 80.0%2007 4 16 20 2007 20.0% 80.0%2008 7 40 47 2008 14.9% 85.1%2009 4 21 25 2009 16.0% 84.0%2010 8 35 43 2010 18.6% 81.4%2011 11 45 56 2011 19.6% 80.4%

2012 5 39 44 2012 11.4% 88.6%2013 8 28 36 2013 22.2% 77.8%2014 14 44 58 2014 24.1% 75.9%2015 6 39 45 2015 13.3% 86.7%


Grades 6-8 2006 1 492 493 2006 0.2% 99.8%2007 4 491 495 2007 0.8% 99.2%2008 3 603 606 2008 0.5% 99.5%2009 3 607 610 2009 0.5% 99.5%2010 8 632 640 2010 1.3% 98.8%2011 3 692 695 2011 0.4% 99.6%

2012 5 722 727 2012 0.7% 99.3%2013 4 751 755 2013 0.5% 99.5%2014 8 764 772 2014 1.0% 99.0%2015 10 909 919 2015 1.1% 98.9%

20.0% 20.0%14.9% 16.0% 18.6% 19.6%

11.4%

22.2% 24.1%

13.3%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge o

f Lea

vers


Other staff in grades 9-10+ by Leaver Reason Other

Retirement

0.2% 0.8% 0.5% 0.5% 1.3% 0.4% 0.7% 0.5% 1.0% 1.1%0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge o

f Lea

vers


Academic and Research staff in grades 6-8 by Leaver Reason Other Retirement

13 P.33

Leavers detail

Count EJRA_LeavingReasonGroupEJRA_GradeGroup1Report Year Retirement Other Grand Total Report Year Retirement Other

Grades 6-8 2006 13 179 192 2006 6.8% 93.2%2007 20 170 190 2007 10.5% 89.5%2008 19 202 221 2008 8.6% 91.4%2009 10 183 193 2009 5.2% 94.8%2010 23 224 247 2010 9.3% 90.7%2011 26 234 260 2011 10.0% 90.0%

2012 23 231 254 2012 9.1% 90.9%2013 25 249 274 2013 9.1% 90.9%2014 29 251 280 2014 10.4% 89.6%2015 26 285 311 2015 8.4% 91.6%

6.8%10.5% 8.6%

5.2%9.3% 10.0% 9.1% 9.1% 10.4% 8.4%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge o

f Lea

vers


Other staff in grades 6-8 by Leaver Reason Other

Retirement

14 P.34

Average Age on Retirement



EJRA Implementation

62.6 63.0 62.7

64.5

63.4 63.462.8

63.364.0 64.2

65.064.2

65.8 66.0

64.765.5

64.7 64.465.4 65.8

58

60

62

64

66

68

70

72

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Aver

age

age

on L

eavi

ng

Date Left (August-July)

All EJRA Staff: Average Age on Retirement Female Male

65.066.5

67.0 67.0

65.0

66.7

64.5

66.9 66.9

63.3

66.1 66.3 65.7

67.066.3

58

60

62

64

66

68

70

72

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Aver

age

age

on R

etire

men

t


Statutory Professors: Average Age on Retirement Female Male

15 P.35


69.0

65.0 65.066.0

67.0

61.5

66.0

68.568.0

67.0

65.7

71.0

68.567.7

58

60

62

64

66

68

70

72

2006 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Aver

age

age

on R

etire

men

t


RSIVs: Average Age on Retirement Female Male

63.8

65.3 65.7 65.565.0

67.7

64.3

62.5

65.0 65.0

66.3

65.0 65.0

66.4

65.1

66.265.3 65.5

66.265.7

58

60

62

64

66

68

70

72

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Aver

age

age

on R

etire

men

t


Associate Professors: Average Age on Retirement Female Male

16 P.36


59.3

63.0

66.065.0

62.0

64.063.3

66.3 66.065.5

64.3

67.8

65.3 65.564.3

63.7

68.2

70.3

58

60

62

64

66

68

70

72

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Aver

age

age

on R

etire

men

t


Academic & Research Staff in grades 9-10+: Average Age on Retirement

Female Male

59.8

65.0

59.0

63.5

58.0

60.0

61.161.8 61.5

66.0

61.0

63.364.0

66.7

62.663.4

65.5

58.0

60.0

62.0

64.0

66.0

68.0

70.0

72.0

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Aver

age

Age

on R

etire

men

t

Date left (Aug - July)

Other Staff in grades 9-10+:Average Age on Retirement

Female Male

17 P.37


65.5

58.0

62.0

65.3

62.762.0

61.0

66.0

63.8

65.0

63.5

65.065.3

66.0

64.3

66.8

58

60

62

64

66

68

70

72

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Aver

age

Age

on R

etire

men

t


Academic & Research staff in grades 6-8:Average Age on Retirement

Female Male

61.462.4 61.7

63.3 62.9 62.5 62.5

63.8 63.863.5

63.8 63.4

64.663.8

65.164.5

61.1

62.5 62.7

63.5

58

60

62

64

66

68

70

72

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Aver

age

Age

on R

etire

men

t


Other staff in grades 6-8: Average Age on Retirement

Female Male

18 P.38

Ethnicity Views

Overview of EJRA Population by Ethnicity Summary

Count BME summary31 July BME Unknown White Grand Total2006 502 901 4,302 5,7052007 548 944 4,726 6,2182008 520 1,532 4,611 6,6632009 662 1,271 5,235 7,1682010 760 1,137 5,550 7,4472011 768 991 5,798 7,557

2012 843 967 6,183 7,9932013 920 1,395 6,338 8,6532014 993 1,640 6,718 9,351 EJRA Implementation2015 1,120 1,621 7,137 9,878 Source: Core Personnel and OPENdoor

31 July BME Unknown White Grand Total2006 8.8% 15.8% 75.4% 100.0%2007 8.8% 15.2% 76.0% 100.0%2008 7.8% 23.0% 69.2% 100.0%2009 9.2% 17.7% 73.0% 100.0%2010 10.2% 15.3% 74.5% 100.0%2011 10.2% 13.1% 76.7% 100.0%2012 10.5% 12.1% 77.4% 100.0%2013 10.6% 16.1% 73.2% 100.0%2014 10.6% 17.5% 71.8% 100.0%2015 11.3% 16.4% 72.3% 100.0%

EJRA ImplementationEJRA ageSource: Core Personnel and OPENdoor

EJRA Population by Ethnicity and Age Category

Count EJRA_AgeCats2BME summary 31 July Under 30 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 59 60 to 67 68 to 70 71 + Grand Total

BME 2006 88 238 127 36 13 5022007 99 269 124 43 13 5482008 79 242 132 52 15 5202009 112 325 150 60 15 6622010 122 385 168 70 15 7602011 119 372 189 74 14 768

2012 124 414 203 84 18 8432013 124 463 200 109 23 1 9202014 136 516 202 112 26 1 9932015 162 576 226 131 25 1120

BME Total 1165 3800 1721 771 177 2 7636Unknown 2006 84 375 225 157 58 1 1 901

2007 95 379 234 174 60 1 1 9442008 288 632 311 208 89 3 1 15322009 167 526 289 196 86 7 12712010 108 458 287 190 89 5 11372011 67 372 278 186 83 4 1 991

2012 57 350 275 199 80 5 1 9672013 165 539 337 244 100 8 2 13952014 179 685 382 266 119 5 4 16402015 188 695 369 252 113 2 2 1621

Unknown Total 1398 5011 2987 2072 877 41 13 12399White 2006 534 1402 1101 880 381 4 4302

2007 593 1613 1156 935 422 5 2 47262008 467 1567 1180 948 436 11 2 46112009 590 1832 1327 993 475 16 2 5235

2010 635 2008 1397 1035 458 15 2 55502011 599 2142 1493 1098 443 17 6 5798

2012 680 2256 1558 1186 470 24 9 61832013 638 2314 1645 1211 487 32 11 6338

2014 681 2506 1707 1276 507 33 8 67182015 706 2636 1815 1405 534 28 13 7137

White Total 6123 20276 14379 10967 4613 185 55 56598

8.8% 8.8% 7.8% 9.2% 10.2% 10.2% 10.5% 10.6% 10.6% 11.3%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge o

f pop

ulat

ion

Snapshot at 31 July

BME as a Proportion of EJRA Population Grand Total

BME

19 P.39

Ethnicity Views

Overview of EJRA Population by Ethnicity Summary and Group

Count BME summary Count BME summaryEJRA_GradeGroup1 31 July BME White Unknown Grand Total EJRA_GradeGroup1 31 July BME White Unknown Grand Total

Statutory Professors 2006 5 183 39 227 Statutory Professors 2006 2.2% 80.6% 17.2% 100.0%2007 4 187 48 239 2007 1.7% 78.2% 20.1% 100.0%2008 5 191 51 247 2008 2.0% 77.3% 20.6% 100.0%2009 5 185 45 235 2009 2.1% 78.7% 19.1% 100.0%2010 7 186 41 234 2010 3.0% 79.5% 17.5% 100.0%2011 9 190 44 243 2011 3.7% 78.2% 18.1% 100.0%

2012 9 195 47 251 2012 3.6% 77.7% 18.7% 100.0%2013 9 183 59 251 2013 3.6% 72.9% 23.5% 100.0%2014 10 181 69 260 2014 3.8% 69.6% 26.5% 100.0%2015 9 173 66 248 2015 3.6% 69.8% 26.6% 100.0%

RSIV 2006 43 5 48 RSIV 2006 0.0% 89.6% 10.4% 100.0%2007 2 54 9 65 2007 3.1% 83.1% 13.8% 100.0%2008 4 68 18 90 2008 4.4% 75.6% 20.0% 100.0%2009 5 85 18 108 2009 4.6% 78.7% 16.7% 100.0%2010 6 90 15 111 2010 5.4% 81.1% 13.5% 100.0%2011 5 100 10 115 2011 4.3% 87.0% 8.7% 100.0%

2012 5 119 13 137 2012 3.6% 86.9% 9.5% 100.0%2013 6 121 37 164 2013 3.7% 73.8% 22.6% 100.0%2014 7 135 53 195 2014 3.6% 69.2% 27.2% 100.0%2015 9 144 55 208 2015 4.3% 69.2% 26.4% 100.0%

Associate Professor 2006 60 875 228 1,163 Associate Professor 2006 5.2% 75.2% 19.6% 100.0%2007 55 844 208 1,107 2007 5.0% 76.2% 18.8% 100.0%2008 61 848 221 1,130 2008 5.4% 75.0% 19.6% 100.0%2009 60 837 212 1,109 2009 5.4% 75.5% 19.1% 100.0%2010 64 847 210 1,121 2010 5.7% 75.6% 18.7% 100.0%2011 63 828 196 1,087 2011 5.8% 76.2% 18.0% 100.0%

2012 68 820 183 1,071 2012 6.3% 76.6% 17.1% 100.0%2013 71 821 226 1,118 2013 6.4% 73.4% 20.2% 100.0%2014 80 852 244 1,176 2014 6.8% 72.4% 20.7% 100.0%2015 78 876 231 1,185 2015 6.6% 73.9% 19.5% 100.0%

Grades 9-10+ 2006 63 589 112 764 Grades 9-10+ 2006 8.2% 77.1% 14.7% 100.0%2007 75 644 116 835 2007 9.0% 77.1% 13.9% 100.0%2008 73 659 170 902 2008 8.1% 73.1% 18.8% 100.0%2009 85 740 148 973 2009 8.7% 76.1% 15.2% 100.0%2010 91 783 144 1,018 2010 8.9% 76.9% 14.1% 100.0%2011 96 856 136 1,088 2011 8.8% 78.7% 12.5% 100.0%

2012 104 911 148 1,163 2012 8.9% 78.3% 12.7% 100.0%2013 123 954 231 1,308 2013 9.4% 72.9% 17.7% 100.0%2014 126 995 254 1,375 2014 9.2% 72.4% 18.5% 100.0%2015 133 1,086 262 1,481 2015 9.0% 73.3% 17.7% 100.0%

Grades 6-8 2006 374 2,612 517 3,503 Grades 6-8 2006 10.7% 74.6% 14.8% 100.0%2007 412 2,997 563 3,972 2007 10.4% 75.5% 14.2% 100.0%2008 377 2,845 1,072 4,294 2008 8.8% 66.3% 25.0% 100.0%2009 507 3,388 848 4,743 2009 10.7% 71.4% 17.9% 100.0%2010 592 3,644 727 4,963 2010 11.9% 73.4% 14.6% 100.0%2011 595 3,824 605 5,024 2011 11.8% 76.1% 12.0% 100.0%

2012 657 4,138 576 5,371 2012 12.2% 77.0% 10.7% 100.0%2013 711 4,259 842 5,812 2013 12.2% 73.3% 14.5% 100.0%2014 770 4,555 1,020 6,345 2014 12.1% 71.8% 16.1% 100.0%2015 891 4,858 1,007 6,756 2015 13.2% 71.9% 14.9% 100.0%

20 P.40

Ethnicity Views

EJRA Leavers by Ethnicity Summary - Retirees vs. Other Leavers

Count EJRA_LeavingReasonGroupBME Summary

Report Year BME Unknown White BME Unknown White2006 9 45 54 93 182 558 833 8872007 1 15 48 64 102 140 547 789 8532008 6 62 68 129 152 672 953 1,0212009 1 8 64 73 133 198 602 933 1,0062010 1 8 71 80 142 182 675 999 1,0792011 1 16 68 85 178 165 770 1,113 1,198

2012 5 9 78 92 208 113 801 1,122 1,2142013 2 8 71 81 177 137 825 1,139 1,2202014 11 78 89 188 198 822 1,208 1,2972015 4 11 79 94 204 259 913 1,376 1,470

Count EJRA_LeavingReasonGroupBME Summary

Report Year BME Unknown White BME Unknown White2006 0.0% 16.7% 83.3% 100.0% 11.2% 21.8% 67.0% 100.0%2007 1.6% 23.4% 75.0% 100.0% 12.9% 17.7% 69.3% 100.0%2008 0.0% 8.8% 91.2% 100.0% 13.5% 15.9% 70.5% 100.0%2009 1.4% 11.0% 87.7% 100.0% 14.3% 21.2% 64.5% 100.0%2010 1.3% 10.0% 88.8% 100.0% 14.2% 18.2% 67.6% 100.0%2011 1.2% 18.8% 80.0% 100.0% 16.0% 14.8% 69.2% 100.0%

2012 5.4% 9.8% 84.8% 100.0% 18.5% 10.1% 71.4% 100.0%2013 2.5% 9.9% 87.7% 100.0% 15.5% 12.0% 72.4% 100.0%2014 0.0% 12.4% 87.6% 100.0% 15.6% 16.4% 68.0% 100.0%2015 4.3% 11.7% 84.0% 100.0% 14.8% 18.8% 66.4% 100.0%

Report Year BME Unknown White BME Unknown White2006 0.0% 16.7% 83.3% 100.0% 11.2% 21.8% 67.0% 100.0%2007 1.6% 23.4% 75.0% 100.0% 12.9% 17.7% 69.3% 100.0%2008 0.0% 8.8% 91.2% 100.0% 13.5% 15.9% 70.5% 100.0%2009 1.4% 11.0% 87.7% 100.0% 14.3% 21.2% 64.5% 100.0%2010 1.3% 10.0% 88.8% 100.0% 14.2% 18.2% 67.6% 100.0%2011 1.2% 18.8% 80.0% 100.0% 16.0% 14.8% 69.2% 100.0%

2012 5.4% 9.8% 84.8% 100.0% 18.5% 10.1% 71.4% 100.0%2013 2.5% 9.9% 87.7% 100.0% 15.5% 12.0% 72.4% 100.0%2014 0.0% 12.4% 87.6% 100.0% 15.6% 16.4% 68.0% 100.0%2015 4.3% 11.7% 84.0% 100.0% 14.8% 18.8% 66.4% 100.0%

Retirement Retirement Total

OtherOther Total

Other TotalOtherRetirement

TotalRetirement

Grand TotalRetirement Retirement

TotalOther

Other Total

0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 1.4% 1.3% 1.2%

5.4%2.5%

0.0%

4.3%

16.7%

23.4%

8.8%11.0% 10.0%

18.8%

9.8% 9.9%12.4% 11.7%

83.3%

75.0%

91.2%87.7% 88.8%

80.0%

84.8%87.7% 87.6%

84.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge o

f Lea

vers


Comparison of Leaver Reason (Retirement and Other) by Ethnicity Other - BME Other - Unknown Other - White

Retirement - BME Retirement - Unknown Retirement - White

21 P.41

Disability Views

Overview of EJRA Population by Disability Summary

Count Disability summary

31 JulyDeclared Disability Not Disabled Unknown Grand Total EJRA Implementation

2006 179 4,635 891 5,705 Source: Core Personnel and OPENdoor

2007 202 5,113 903 6,2182008 191 4,994 1,478 6,6632009 225 5,733 1,210 7,168

2010 250 6,128 1,069 7,4472011 248 6,369 940 7,557

2012 280 6,782 931 7,9932013 288 7,005 1,360 8,6532014 309 7,429 1,613 9,3512015 314 7,927 1,637 9,878

31 JulyDeclared Disability Not Disabled Unknown Grand Total

2006 3.1% 81.2% 15.6% 100.0%2007 3.2% 82.2% 14.5% 100.0%2008 2.9% 75.0% 22.2% 100.0%2009 3.1% 80.0% 16.9% 100.0%2010 3.4% 82.3% 14.4% 100.0%2011 3.3% 84.3% 12.4% 100.0%

2012 3.5% 84.8% 11.6% 100.0%2013 3.3% 81.0% 15.7% 100.0%2014 3.3% 79.4% 17.2% 100.0%2015 3.2% 80.2% 16.6% 100.0%

EJRA Population by Disability Summary and Age Category

Count EJRA_AgeCats2Disability summary 31 July Under 30 30 to 39 40 to 49 50 to 59 60 to 67 68 to 70 71 + Grand Total

Declared Disability 2006 21 50 41 44 23 1792007 25 67 40 48 22 2022008 21 56 47 48 18 1 191

2009 29 66 50 57 22 1 2252010 40 80 56 54 20 2502011 33 75 65 56 19 248

2012 31 102 69 55 22 1 2802013 35 93 75 53 31 1 288

2014 28 109 82 60 27 3 3092015 29 102 78 70 30 5 314

Not Disabled 2006 596 1592 1192 877 374 4 46352007 672 1832 1247 939 416 5 2 51132008 530 1780 1273 963 436 10 2 49942009 685 2113 1438 1008 472 15 2 57332010 727 2340 1526 1061 457 15 2 61282011 701 2445 1629 1126 443 19 6 6369

2012 783 2577 1690 1228 470 25 9 67822013 736 2694 1769 1278 482 34 12 70052014 791 2929 1818 1337 513 31 10 74292015 831 3112 1936 1476 537 22 13 7927

Unknown 2006 89 373 220 152 55 1 1 8912007 90 362 227 165 57 1 1 9032008 283 605 303 197 86 3 1 14782009 155 504 278 184 82 7 12102010 98 431 270 180 85 5 10692011 51 366 266 176 78 2 1 940

2012 47 341 277 186 76 3 1 9312013 156 529 338 233 97 6 1 1360

2014 177 669 391 257 112 5 2 16132015 196 693 396 242 105 3 2 1637

EJRA

3.1% 3.2% 2.9% 3.1% 3.4% 3.3% 3.5% 3.3% 3.3% 3.2%0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge o

f EJR

A Po

pula

tion

Snapshot at 31 July

Declared Disability as a Proportion of EJRA Population Grand Total

Declared Disability

22 P.42

Disability Views

Overview of EJRA Population by Disability Summary and Group

Count Disability summary Count Disability summary

EJRA_GradeGroup1 31 JulyDeclared Disability Not Disabled Unknown Grand Total EJRA_GradeGroup1 31 July

Declared Disability Not Disabled Unknown Grand Total

Statutory Professors 2006 9 181 37 227 Statutory Professors 2006 4.0% 79.7% 16.3% 100.0%2007 7 186 46 239 2007 2.9% 77.8% 19.2% 100.0%2008 7 192 48 247 2008 2.8% 77.7% 19.4% 100.0%2009 6 186 43 235 2009 2.6% 79.1% 18.3% 100.0%2010 7 188 39 234 2010 3.0% 80.3% 16.7% 100.0%2011 6 195 42 243 2011 2.5% 80.2% 17.3% 100.0%

2012 7 200 44 251 2012 2.8% 79.7% 17.5% 100.0%2013 7 187 57 251 2013 2.8% 74.5% 22.7% 100.0%2014 9 184 67 260 2014 3.5% 70.8% 25.8% 100.0%2015 8 178 62 248 2015 3.2% 71.8% 25.0% 100.0%

RSIV 2006 42 6 48 RSIV 2006 0.0% 87.5% 12.5% 100.0%2007 55 10 65 2007 0.0% 84.6% 15.4% 100.0%2008 72 18 90 2008 0.0% 80.0% 20.0% 100.0%2009 91 17 108 2009 0.0% 84.3% 15.7% 100.0%2010 97 14 111 2010 0.0% 87.4% 12.6% 100.0%2011 2 104 9 115 2011 1.7% 90.4% 7.8% 100.0%

2012 5 120 12 137 2012 3.6% 87.6% 8.8% 100.0%2013 6 122 36 164 2013 3.7% 74.4% 22.0% 100.0%2014 6 137 52 195 2014 3.1% 70.3% 26.7% 100.0%2015 8 145 55 208 2015 3.8% 69.7% 26.4% 100.0%

Associate Professor 2006 26 916 221 1,163 Associate Professor 2006 2.2% 78.8% 19.0% 100.0%2007 27 879 201 1,107 2007 2.4% 79.4% 18.2% 100.0%2008 30 893 207 1,130 2008 2.7% 79.0% 18.3% 100.0%2009 31 882 196 1,109 2009 2.8% 79.5% 17.7% 100.0%2010 30 895 196 1,121 2010 2.7% 79.8% 17.5% 100.0%2011 28 876 183 1,087 2011 2.6% 80.6% 16.8% 100.0%

2012 25 873 173 1,071 2012 2.3% 81.5% 16.2% 100.0%2013 27 875 216 1,118 2013 2.4% 78.3% 19.3% 100.0%2014 27 915 234 1,176 2014 2.3% 77.8% 19.9% 100.0%2015 28 935 222 1,185 2015 2.4% 78.9% 18.7% 100.0%

Grades 9-10+ 2006 23 632 109 764 Grades 9-10+ 2006 3.0% 82.7% 14.3% 100.0%2007 25 702 108 835 2007 3.0% 84.1% 12.9% 100.0%2008 24 713 165 902 2008 2.7% 79.0% 18.3% 100.0%2009 30 804 139 973 2009 3.1% 82.6% 14.3% 100.0%2010 27 856 135 1,018 2010 2.7% 84.1% 13.3% 100.0%2011 32 931 125 1,088 2011 2.9% 85.6% 11.5% 100.0%

2012 35 986 142 1,163 2012 3.0% 84.8% 12.2% 100.0%2013 38 1,046 224 1,308 2013 2.9% 80.0% 17.1% 100.0%2014 39 1,085 251 1,375 2014 2.8% 78.9% 18.3% 100.0%2015 44 1,175 262 1,481 2015 3.0% 79.3% 17.7% 100.0%

Grades 6-8 2006 121 2,864 518 3,503 Grades 6-8 2006 3.5% 81.8% 14.8% 100.0%2007 143 3,291 538 3,972 2007 3.6% 82.9% 13.5% 100.0%2008 130 3,124 1,040 4,294 2008 3.0% 72.8% 24.2% 100.0%2009 158 3,770 815 4,743 2009 3.3% 79.5% 17.2% 100.0%2010 186 4,092 685 4,963 2010 3.7% 82.5% 13.8% 100.0%2011 180 4,263 581 5,024 2011 3.6% 84.9% 11.6% 100.0%

2012 208 4,603 560 5,371 2012 3.9% 85.7% 10.4% 100.0%2013 210 4,775 827 5,812 2013 3.6% 82.2% 14.2% 100.0%2014 228 5,108 1,009 6,345 2014 3.6% 80.5% 15.9% 100.0%2015 226 5,494 1,036 6,756 2015 3.3% 81.3% 15.3% 100.0%

23 P.43

Disability Views

EJRA Leavers by Disability Summary - Retirees vs. Other Leavers

Count EJRA_LeavingReasonGroupDisability Summary

Report YearDeclared Disability

No Disability UnknownDeclared Disability

No Disability Unknown

2006 5 42 7 54 25 633 175 833 8872007 2 48 14 64 21 622 146 789 8532008 3 60 5 68 41 767 145 953 1,0212009 2 64 7 73 32 710 191 933 1,0062010 3 69 8 80 38 789 172 999 1,0792011 6 64 15 85 44 923 146 1,113 1,198

2012 4 70 18 92 44 955 123 1,122 1,2142013 73 8 81 33 968 138 1,139 1,2202014 4 76 9 89 20 1,001 187 1,208 1,2972015 7 76 11 94 38 1,068 270 1,376 1,470

Count EJRA_LeavingReasonGroupDisability Summary




2006 9.3% 77.8% 13.0% 100.0% 3.0% 76.0% 21.0% 100.0%2007 3.1% 75.0% 21.9% 100.0% 2.7% 78.8% 18.5% 100.0%2008 4.4% 88.2% 7.4% 100.0% 4.3% 80.5% 15.2% 100.0%2009 2.7% 87.7% 9.6% 100.0% 3.4% 76.1% 20.5% 100.0%2010 3.8% 86.3% 10.0% 100.0% 3.8% 79.0% 17.2% 100.0%2011 7.1% 75.3% 17.6% 100.0% 4.0% 82.9% 13.1% 100.0%

2012 4.3% 76.1% 19.6% 100.0% 3.9% 85.1% 11.0% 100.0%2013 0.0% 90.1% 9.9% 100.0% 2.9% 85.0% 12.1% 100.0%2014 4.5% 85.4% 10.1% 100.0% 1.7% 82.9% 15.5% 100.0%2015 7.4% 80.9% 11.7% 100.0% 2.8% 77.6% 19.6% 100.0%




2006 9.3% 77.8% 13.0% 100.0% 3.0% 76.0% 21.0% 100.0%2007 3.1% 75.0% 21.9% 100.0% 2.7% 78.8% 18.5% 100.0%2008 4.4% 88.2% 7.4% 100.0% 4.3% 80.5% 15.2% 100.0%2009 2.7% 87.7% 9.6% 100.0% 3.4% 76.1% 20.5% 100.0%2010 3.8% 86.3% 10.0% 100.0% 3.8% 79.0% 17.2% 100.0%2011 7.1% 75.3% 17.6% 100.0% 4.0% 82.9% 13.1% 100.0%

2012 4.3% 76.1% 19.6% 100.0% 3.9% 85.1% 11.0% 100.0%2013 0.0% 90.1% 9.9% 100.0% 2.9% 85.0% 12.1% 100.0%2014 4.5% 85.4% 10.1% 100.0% 1.7% 82.9% 15.5% 100.0%2015 7.4% 80.9% 11.7% 100.0% 2.8% 77.6% 19.6% 100.0%

RetirementRetirement

Total

OtherOther Total


Total

OtherOther Total


Total

OtherOther Total Grand Total

9.3%

3.1% 4.4% 2.7% 3.8%7.1%

4.3%

0.0%

4.5% 7.4%

77.8%75.0%

88.2% 87.7% 86.3%

75.3% 76.1%

90.1%

85.4%

80.9%

13.0%

21.9%

7.4%9.6% 10.0%

17.6%19.6%

9.9% 10.1% 11.7%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Perc

enta

ge o

f Lea

vers


Comparison of Leaver Reasons (Retirement and Other) by Disability Other - Declared Disability Other - No Disability

Other - Unknown Retirement - Declared Disability

Retirement - No Disability Retirement - Unknown

24 P.44

Annexe G

Data on the exceptions procedure in place prior to 1 October 2015, the ‘old’ procedure

1. The ‘old’ procedure

Under the ‘old’ procedures, individuals made applications for extended employment to their

departments (or, for academic staff, direct to their division). The department and division

wrote to support or not support the case and all the paperwork was considered by a Panel of

three current or former members of the Personnel Committee, or of senior members of the

University with governance experience appointed by the Personnel Committee.

If the department or division did not support the case, a meeting was held at which all the

parties made their case before a decision was made. The Panel could, if it wished, request

such a meeting if they considered that the application was complicated or finely balanced.

All applications were considered in the context of the Aims and a set of considerations that

were published within the policy.

If an application was not accepted or was accepted in part only, the individual had the right

of appeal to the University’s Appeal Court under Part H of Statute XII.

2. Data on applications for extended employment under the ‘old’ procedure

During the last three complete years of operation of the ‘old’ procedures, 2012-151, 264

people who were subject to the EJRA retired from the University’s employment. During the

same period, 152 people applied for extended employment2.

The proportion of those who retired and who applied for extended employment has remained

relatively steady each year, although it is thought that the numbers were inflated in 2012-13

by departments or faculties (most commonly those in the Humanities) seeking to retain

academic staff for a short period for the purposes of the REF.

73 (48%) of those applications were made at the ‘normal’ retirement age ie at ages 65-67

(for an extension beyond age 67, in all cases).

21 (14%) were made before the individual was 65: this includes ‘prospective’ applications ie

those applications made on behalf of individuals who were offered posts when they were

already nearing the retirement age. (Prospective applications are not permitted under the

‘new’ procedures in place since 1 October 2015).

The remaining 58 (38%) applications were made by individuals after they were 67 and are

therefore second or subsequent applications.

The following table shows the number of staff who applied for an extension early or in the

normal timescale, or for a further extension, by year. It also shows the success rate by year,

and the number of staff who retired.

1 Data for 2011-12 is unrepresentative because the retirement age for most staff was moved from 65-67 in 2011, and most of the applicants that year were those who had worked beyond their retirement age under the old procedures without Personnel Committee authorisation, who were identified in the data gathering exercise to support the consultation over the EJRA. 2 There will be some small overlap between these figures, where an individual applied for a short extension during this period and retired at the end of it.

P.45

Annexe G

Sought

extension

at 65-67

Retired

at 65-67

Sought

extension in

advance ie

before they

were 65

Sought

further

extension ie

after age 67

Total sought

extension

(no. and %

successful)

Total retired at

any age (incl.

those who

applied

unsuccessfully)

2012-

13

16 44 7 32 55 (49 –

89%)

81

2013-

14

22 33 7 19 48 (45 –

94%)

89

2014-

15

35 53 7 7 49 (44 –

90%)

94

Total 73 130 21 58 152 (138

– 91%)

264

3. Diversity

In 2012-15, 35 (23%) of the applications were from women: since the total number of

applications from women is low, the range across the years is wide – 17%-29%. Women

comprise 43% of the staff who are subject to the EJRA. It is not known why women make

fewer applications for extended employment than men, although it may be relevant that they

are under-represented among academic staff who make the highest proportion of

applications.

No data was collected on the ethnic background or disability status of applicants.

4. Applications by division

In 2012-15, the proportion of applications by division was (proportion of total staff subject to

the EJRA in brackets)

Division Proportion of total applications

Proportion of total staff subject to the EJRA

Medical Sciences 30% 40%

MPLS 17% 19%

Social Sciences 29% 12%

Humanities 20% 7%

GLAM 2% 9%

UAS 3% 13%

The Humanities and Social Sciences Divisions were over-represented ie they had a greater

proportion of applications than they have staff who are subject to the EJRA (the ‘EJRA

population’. Medical Sciences was under-represented, and GLAM and UAS were very

under-represented.

The following table shows the number of applications by division and year, and the

percentage of applications made by women, by year.

P.46

Annexe G

Medical

Sciences MPLS

Social

Sciences

Human-

ities GLAM UAS

Total by

year

% from

women

2012/13 9 12 17 14 1 2 55 25.5%

2013/14 15 6 16 9 1 1 48 16.6%

2014/15 21 8 11 7 1 1 49 28.9%

Total by

division 45 26 44 30 3 4 152 23.0%

% 29.6% 17.3% 28.9% 19.7% 2.0% 2.6% 100% -

5. Data on the success rate of applications under the ‘old’ procedure

Of the 152 applications, 138 (91%) were accepted, in whole or in part.

This includes:

those who were only approved for a shorter period of time than they had asked for, or

for a smaller FTE (in some cases, this was limited to the FTE for which they had full

funding); and,

those whose applications involved them moving to part-time working or out of their

substantive post into a specially-created, fixed-term post, in order that their

substantive post could be refilled.

6. Detail on applications in 2014/15

2014/15, a ‘typical’ year, has been analysed further to give a more detailed picture of

application types. There were 49 applications in this year.

Statutory professors were over-represented ie they put in a substantially higher proportion of

the applications than their proportion of staff who are subject to the EJRA overall.

Those in administrative and professional roles were under-represented.

Role type No. applications % applications % of population

Statutory professor 9 18% 2.5%

Other academic 9 18% 15%

Research post 26 53% 51%

Administrative / professional post

5 10% 31%

13 (27%) of the applications were from women. No data is held on the number of

applications from those in ethnic minorities or those who declare a disability.

P.47

Annexe G

Of the 18 applications from academic staff, 7 (16% of the overall applications and 39% of the

applications from academic staff) applied to vacate their substantive posts and move to

specially created, fixed-term posts, in order that their substantive post could be refilled.

14 (32%) of the applicants sought to move into part-time posts or to change their hours to

part-time, thus freeing up resources that could be used to recruit others.

Of the 49 applications, 44 (90%) were successful, in whole or in part. 8 (18%) were

successful in part only ie the approval for continued employment was contingent upon them

moving out of their substantive post into a specially-created, fixed-term post, thus freeing up

their post for recruitment, or on them moving to a part-time contract (often matched to the

FTE that they could fund). These measures are designed to minimise the impact of any

extensions on the Aims.

The length of extensions sought varied from 3 to 60 months. Most were in the range 12-24

months.

The reasons given for seeking extensions included: research leadership; ad personam

grants; the need to retain specific skills that could not be replaced, often for teaching; and

the need to take on a particular role, for which no other individual was suitable and available,

such as Head of Department.

P.48

Annexe H

Data on the exceptions process in place from 1 October 2015, the ‘new procedure’

1. Applications under the new procedure (including 2016-17 applications) Of the 35 applications under the new procedure, 13 were made in 2015-16 and 22 in 2016-17. There may yet be further applications in 2016-17. 22 were from members of the Medical Sciences Division, 9 from members of the MPLS Division and 4 from members of the Social Sciences Division. There were no applications from the Humanities Division, from UAS or from GLAM. 24 (69%) of the 35 applications were from those below the EJRA and 11 (31%) were from those above the EJRA – these 11 were necessarily repeat applications. Of the 11 applicants above the EJRA:

8 held research posts, 2 held academic posts (ie they had retained those posts for the period of their previous extension(s) – and were applying to continue to do so) and 1 held an administrative post

4 of the 8 staff holding research posts had stepped out of academic posts on taking up a previous extension

5 were 70 or older at the point when they applied for another extension

1 was a woman. Of the 24 applicants below the EJRA:

13 held research posts, 9 held academic posts (4 of these proposed to step into a research post for the period of their extension) and 2 held an administrative post

1 of the 13 staff holding research posts had stepped out of an academic post on taking up a previous extension

5 were women

2. Funding for applications Under the procedure in place before October 2015, it was considered to be a strength if an application demonstrated that the person would fund themselves and thus minimise the impact on the Aims by avoiding any financial impact on the Department’s ability to recruit. Data on the funding of applications was not kept in precise terms, and some applications were part-funded, or the funding relied on the success of future grant applications. Any assessment of the proportion of applications that were funded is somewhat imprecise. Approximately 60% of applications from Medical Sciences, MPLS and Social Sciences were funded. Approximately 40% of applications from the Humanities Division were funded (often for part FTE extensions limited to the FTE that could be funded by a grant or other means). Applications from Humanities drew on a wider range of sources than other divisions, where the source of funding was almost always research grant income. The sources cited in applications from the Humanities Division included visiting student income, REF income, central funding to cover for a Proctor, donor gift for the purposes of a specific project. The clearer expectations around funding in the new procedure appears to have changed behaviours. Of the 35 applications under the new procedure:

22 were from the Medial Sciences Division, of which 17 were funded and 1 was part-funded

P.49

Annexe H

9 were from MPLS, of which 5 were funded and 1 was part-funded

4 were from Social Sciences, of which 3 were funded. There have been no applications from the Humanities, UAS or GLAM. All funding was to be drawn from grants.

3. Length of extensions requested The 22 applications from the Medical Sciences Division sought extensions ranging from 6 months (a repeat extension to finish a project) to six years. The average was 2.5 years and the mode 3 years. The 9 applications from MPLS sought extensions ranging from 1 to 4 years, with an average of 2.4 years. The 4 applications from Social Sciences sought extensions ranging from 2 to 4 years, with an average of 2.5 years. The data relating to length of extensions is consistent with applications under the old procedure, with a small variance before the REF, when a number of short extensions were sought, mainly in Humanities. SJT 19 December 2016

P.50

EJRA Population by EJRA Grade Group and Grade Equivalent (31 July 2015)

Count Staff Group

EJRAGradeGroup2 EJRA_Grade Equivalent2 Academic Research

Other Staff

Groups

Total

31 July 2015

Statutory Professors Professors 207 1 0 208

Professors - Clinical 35 0 35

Statutory Professors Total 242 1 0 243

Associate Professor Readers 25 0 25

Associate Professor (10a only) 1,116 2 1,118

Associate Professor/Researcher (Clinical) 47 200 2 249

Associate Professor Total 1,188 200 4 1,392

RSIV & Senior Researchers RSIV 70 131 7 208

Royal Society Professor 2 3 0 5

Wellcome Fellows 1 0 1

RSIV & Senior Researchers Total 72 135 7 214

Senior Staff (ALC6) Senior Staff (ALC6) 9 85 94

Senior Staff (ALC6) Total 9 85 94

Grades 8-10+ Academic - Clinical 32 0 32

Research - Clinical 2 242 1 245

Grade 10 34 153 152 339

Grade 9 26 215 322 563

Grade 8 65 680 788 1,533

Marie Curie Fellows 79 0 79

Grades 8-10+ Total 159 1,369 1,263 2,791

Grades 6-7 Marie Curie Researchers 19 0 19

Grade 7 112 2,609 1,044 3,765

Grade 6 2 534 824 1,360

Grades 6-7 Total 114 3,162 1,868 5,144

Grand Total 1,784 4,867 3,227 9,878

Source: Core Personnel

Note: Staff Groups are based on staff classification, guidance can be found at:

http://www.admin.ox.ac.uk/media/global/wwwadminoxacuk/localsites/personnel/documents/recruitingstaff/recruitment/Staff_classification_May_

2016.pdf

P.51

bras2008

Text Box

Annexe I

Comparison of Age Bands by Legal Sex and EJRA Grade Group (Further analysis November 2016)

EJRA_GradeGroup1Statutory Professors EJRA_GradeGroup1Statutory Professors

Count 31 July Count 31 July

Age Band Sex 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Age Band Sex 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

30 to 39 Male 6 8 6 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 30 to 39 Male 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

40 to 49 Female 4 4 6 5 6 7 6 5 6 7 40 to 49 Female 9.8% 10.8% 16.2% 13.5% 14.6% 16.3% 12.8% 10.4% 14.0% 17.9%

Male 37 33 31 32 35 36 41 43 37 32 Male 90.2% 89.2% 83.8% 86.5% 85.4% 83.7% 87.2% 89.6% 86.0% 82.1%


Male 99 103 104 99 87 89 92 91 96 95 Male 91.7% 90.4% 89.7% 90.0% 88.8% 89.0% 87.6% 90.1% 90.6% 88.0%


Male 42 50 59 59 59 61 50 50 58 52 Male 91.3% 94.3% 90.8% 95.2% 95.2% 92.4% 87.7% 84.7% 85.3% 83.9%

65+ Female 5 2 3 2 2 1 1 2 2 65+ Female 20.8% 8.0% 0.0% 14.3% 7.4% 7.7% 2.9% 2.8% 5.9% 6.7%

Male 19 23 20 18 25 24 33 35 32 28 Male 79.2% 92.0% 100.0% 85.7% 92.6% 92.3% 97.1% 97.2% 94.1% 93.3%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

0.0

%

12

.9%

6.4

%

7.1

%

7.2

%

5.6

%

7.6

%

8.8

%

10

.5%

11

.8%

13

.0%

10

0.0

%

10

0.0

%

10

0.0

%

10

0.0

%

10

0.0

%

10

0.0

%

10

0.0

%

10

0.0

%

10

0.0

%

10

0.0

%

87

.1%

93

.6%

92

.9%

92

.8%

94

.4%

92

.4%

91

.2%

89

.5%

88

.2%

87

.0%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

30 to 39 60+

Statutory Professors: comparison of age bands by legal sex Female Male

1 P.53

bras2008

Text Box

Annexe J

EJRA_GradeGroup1RSIV EJRA_GradeGroup1RSIV



30 to 39 Female 1 1 2 1 1 30 to 39 Female 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.3% 33.3% 0.0% 33.3% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Male 1 4 5 6 4 2 2 3 4 5 Male 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 85.7% 66.7% 100.0% 66.7% 75.0% 100.0% 100.0%


Male 10 13 20 29 30 28 33 39 42 44 Male 71.4% 68.4% 76.9% 80.6% 85.7% 80.0% 84.6% 86.7% 82.4% 84.6%


Male 11 12 19 20 25 32 38 45 59 64 Male 64.7% 66.7% 65.5% 62.5% 64.1% 69.6% 71.7% 73.8% 72.0% 69.6%


Male 8 11 14 14 13 11 14 17 20 23 Male 88.9% 78.6% 82.4% 70.0% 65.0% 55.0% 58.3% 65.4% 69.0% 69.7%

65+ Female 3 3 3 3 1 1 3 7 6 5 65+ Female 50.0% 30.0% 23.1% 23.1% 9.1% 8.3% 16.7% 25.0% 20.7% 19.2%

Male 3 7 10 10 10 11 15 21 23 21 Male 50.0% 70.0% 76.9% 76.9% 90.9% 91.7% 83.3% 75.0% 79.3% 80.8%

50

.0%

0.0

%

0.0

%

14

.3%

33

.3%

0.0

%

33

.3%

25

.0%

0.0

%

0.0

%

26

.7%

25

.0%

20

.0%

27

.3%

25

.8%

31

.3%

31

.0%

29

.6%

25

.9%

25

.4%

50

.0%

10

0.0

%

10

0.0

%

85

.7%

66

.7%

10

0.0

%

66

.7%

75

.0%

10

0.0

%

10

0.0

%

73

.3%

75

.0% 8

0.0

%

72

.7%

74

.2%

68

.8%

69

.0%

70

.4% 74

.1%

74

.6%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

30 to 39 60+

RSIVs: comparison of age bands by legal sex Female Male

2 P.54

EJRA_GradeGroup1Associate Professor EJRA_GradeGroup1Associate Professor



Under 30 Female 3 5 4 3 2 1 2 1 Under 30 Female 30.0% 50.0% 80.0% 100.0% 100.0% 25.0% 50.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Male 7 5 1 3 2 3 3 1 Male 70.0% 50.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 50.0% 75.0% 100.0% 100.0%


Male 154 157 157 144 148 129 133 154 179 178 Male 71.0% 66.5% 63.3% 65.2% 65.5% 64.5% 67.9% 66.7% 67.5% 67.7%


Male 287 298 299 306 312 311 301 304 305 303 Male 76.9% 77.2% 76.1% 74.6% 75.4% 73.9% 72.2% 71.9% 70.9% 71.1%


Male 227 228 226 227 222 230 233 245 249 261 Male 79.9% 77.0% 75.6% 77.2% 74.0% 75.7% 75.6% 76.8% 76.1% 75.2%


Male 104 106 113 107 100 85 80 68 80 77 Male 83.2% 86.2% 88.3% 82.9% 81.3% 76.6% 74.8% 68.0% 75.5% 76.2%

65+ Female 12 15 10 7 7 7 2 5 10 12 65+ Female 25.0% 26.8% 17.5% 13.5% 12.5% 14.9% 5.1% 12.2% 22.2% 25.5%

Male 36 41 47 45 49 40 37 36 35 35 Male 75.0% 73.2% 82.5% 86.5% 87.5% 85.1% 94.9% 87.8% 77.8% 74.5%

29

.0% 3

3.5

% 36

.7%

34

.8%

34

.5%

35

.5%

32

.1%

33

.3%

32

.5%

32

.3%

19

.1%

17

.9%

13

.5%

16

.0%

16

.8% 2

0.9

%

19

.9%

26

.2%

23

.8%

24

.3%

71

.0%

66

.5%

63

.3%

65

.2%

65

.5%

64

.5% 67

.9%

66

.7%

67

.5%

67

.7%

80

.9%

82

.1% 8

6.5

%

84

.0%

83

.2%

79

.1%

80

.1%

73

.8%

76

.2%

75

.7%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

30 to 39 60+

Associate Professors: comparison of age bands by legal sex Female Male

3 P.55

EJRAGradeGroup2(Multiple Items) REVISED_EJRAGradeGroup(Multiple Items)



Under 30 Female 17 20 24 22 27 22 32 34 30 27 Under 30 Female 47.2% 50.0% 51.1% 41.5% 49.1% 47.8% 54.2% 54.0% 50.8% 43.5%

Male 19 20 23 31 28 24 27 29 29 35 Male 52.8% 50.0% 48.9% 58.5% 50.9% 52.2% 45.8% 46.0% 49.2% 56.5%


Male 289 329 396 424 439 441 449 512 574 614 Male 56.4% 54.4% 55.6% 56.5% 56.3% 55.6% 53.5% 53.8% 54.8% 56.4%


Male 267 280 297 332 367 380 377 385 415 438 Male 59.9% 58.2% 57.8% 55.0% 56.3% 54.4% 51.8% 49.5% 49.5% 49.0%


Male 189 205 217 220 223 243 283 310 310 334 Male 58.3% 58.7% 57.7% 53.5% 52.2% 55.4% 56.2% 56.1% 53.4% 52.7%


Male 60 63 73 93 83 78 80 83 79 75 Male 69.0% 66.3% 62.9% 66.9% 67.5% 65.5% 62.0% 60.6% 58.5% 55.6%

65+ Female 5 7 9 8 8 7 9 17 20 21 65+ Female 29.4% 26.9% 31.0% 24.2% 25.8% 19.4% 21.4% 29.3% 30.3% 28.8%

Male 12 19 20 25 23 29 33 41 46 52 Male 70.6% 73.1% 69.0% 75.8% 74.2% 80.6% 78.6% 70.7% 69.7% 71.2%

Note: Staff in grade ALC6 are included in these figures.

47

.2%

50

.0%

51

.1%

41

.5%

49

.1%

47

.8%

54

.2%

54

.0%

50

.8%

43

.5%

30

.8%

32

.2% 35

.9%

31

.4%

31

.2%

31

.0%

33

.9%

36

.4%

37

.8%

38

.9%

52

.8%

50

.0%

48

.9%

58

.5%

50

.9%

52

.2%

45

.8%

46

.0% 49

.2%

56

.5%

69

.2%

67

.8%

64

.1% 6

8.6

%

68

.8%

69

.0%

66

.1%

63

.6%

62

.2%

61

.1%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

30 to 39 60+

Grades 8 - 10+: comparison of age bands by legal sex Female Male

4 P.56

EJRAGradeGroup2Grades 6-7 EJRAGradeGroup2Grades 6-7



Under 30 Female 303 361 413 426 407 368 390 449 483 498 Under 30 Female 46.0% 49.1% 52.8% 52.4% 50.4% 50.1% 48.9% 52.2% 51.7% 50.2%

Male 355 374 369 387 401 367 408 411 451 495 Male 54.0% 50.9% 47.2% 47.6% 49.6% 49.9% 51.1% 47.8% 48.3% 49.8%

30 to 39 Female 571 645 699 841 920 951 988 1,059 1,174 1,278 30 to 39 Female 46.0% 47.1% 48.3% 50.0% 50.6% 51.0% 50.5% 50.2% 49.6% 50.7%

Male 670 725 747 840 897 915 969 1,051 1,194 1,245 Male 54.0% 52.9% 51.7% 50.0% 49.4% 49.0% 49.5% 49.8% 50.4% 49.3%


Male 231 225 240 259 275 295 311 336 336 352 Male 44.0% 42.1% 40.6% 41.5% 41.9% 42.5% 42.5% 42.1% 40.0% 38.9%


Male 145 149 153 151 152 159 174 180 189 208 Male 44.8% 42.5% 41.9% 40.2% 38.1% 36.8% 38.6% 37.5% 38.1% 38.3%


Male 47 52 57 64 54 43 46 52 54 61 Male 61.0% 59.1% 59.4% 56.6% 51.9% 45.7% 40.4% 42.3% 39.7% 40.4%

65+ Female 6 3 3 4 5 11 11 12 13 15 65+ Female 54.5% 37.5% 60.0% 50.0% 41.7% 61.1% 52.4% 40.0% 40.6% 51.7%

Male 5 5 2 4 7 7 10 18 19 14 Male 45.5% 62.5% 40.0% 50.0% 58.3% 38.9% 47.6% 60.0% 59.4% 48.3%

46

.0%

47

.1%

48

.3%

50

.0%

50

.6%

51

.0%

50

.5%

50

.2%

49

.6%

50

.7%

40

.9%

40

.6%

41

.6%

43

.8% 47

.4%

55

.4% 58

.5%

54

.2%

56

.5%

58

.3%

54

.0%

52

.9%

51

.7%

50

.0%

49

.4%

49

.0%

49

.5%

49

.8%

50

.4%

49

.3%

59

.1%

59

.4%

58

.4%

56

.2%

52

.6%

44

.6%

41

.5% 4

5.8

%

43

.5%

41

.7%

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

30 to 39 60+

Grades 6 - 7: comparison of age bands by legal sex Female Male

5 P.57

6 P.58

Retirement Practices in HE and other sectors in the UK and ... of the EJRA Review Gr… · Annexe A...

Documents

Transcript of Retirement Practices in HE and other sectors in the UK and ... of the EJRA Review Gr… · Annexe A...