Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD...

download Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May 2013 Release

of 60

Transcript of Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD...

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    1/60

    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYOIlPiOIi.0 " H E G ~ e R A I . . cOUNseL.\04_'I .Pl!IlfTAGO,NW A l i H t N G T ~ oeao310i01Qi4,

    J ~ n u a r y 9. 2009

    SUbject: Post..Qovernment Employment Restrictions/Sectlon 847Dear _ b ) _ ( 6 _ )__ ~ _

    The following advice is in response to your request for a legal .opinion .on postGovernment em 10 ment restrictions as they ~ r t a i n to an QPpqintmemlO m p l o y m ~ n t as an b)(6) t o ~ b ) ( 6 ) . . . Ib)(6) This opinion'Supplemerits my opinIon,. dated February 29, 200B,end satisfies .the requirement.under Nationat Defense Authorization Actmr FV 2008.Pubfic Law 1 1 0 ~ 1 8 1 , Seetion847..

    b)(6)

    rI': .

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000061

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    2/60

    b)(6)

    Q!Uussion. As discussed in my preVious letter to you. there:: I" s wide array ofpost-employment restrictions that are appneable to former Government employees.. One vear "CQoJIml-2fl" PeriorJ. Since this employment beg"ins on )(6)

    ~ b ) ( 6 ) Ithe one-year cooling off p'eriod Imposed by 18 U.S.C. 207(0)" is nolo-n-ge-r-,applicable.&J!licabflltvotrkVfe,tlpt8.ftaa.ll, U r " S ~ k ' 1!l7JJJ.(1J tfl!l.fh! l )vg ..YNrB,n Ti,tlt.1& (i.S,C. 207al(21. Both bans are applicable to 'yOur poat-Governmentemployment activitie$ as the.ypertain to particular matters. To be a particular matter,the aellon must be one In which: (1) the United states iSi"& party orh'ss a direct and$ubstantiaJ interest; and involved aspeclfic n o n ~ F e d e r a l party or parties at the timeof your' participation or employment as a F e d e r ~ 1 employee. These bams are stillapplicable to your post-.Governme.nt employment'activittes' and 'wUl be :applicableto yourpost-Government employment as asubc()ntraetof to Kb)(6)1 For example; the t a $ ~ outlined above contemplate.. in p ~ r t .. that. you will provIde lessbrts lea;riled', speelfic caSesto highlight-common and recurring acquis:ition cheillenges" and provide advice andassistance-to help sotve'contempQrary acquisUion challenges.Lifetime Ban (18 U.S.C. A2Q71a)(1}): As noted in mv letter of )_(6_) lyou have a lifetIme ban on the contracts p.ertab1in(jJ tt:! the - - - - ; b ). .6---,),--------,-------,-,,-----,-,-----,-----;;-----;'.7"-,...-......J1Aecord4ngly, you are p r o h i b i ~ o m representing any non ..Federaf entity (1Q InclUde'aotlng a$ a subcontractor to ~ o n this pa.rtlcular matt$r..YClU will be unable to useany of these contracts- as specific cases to highlight com.mon and recurring acqui$itionchalleng'es. Further, you w,i11 be unable to provr(;te advice snd apisla'nc$ to .help resolve'any Is.sues pertarning 10 these partioular matters', because' such ad1Jfce to Federal

    employees or offleers will be. a representation prohibited by the statute. Thia lifetimeban is n.otl.imited to Kb)(6) Ibut"is applicable to n y p a r t i ~ t a .. mBtterif'l which you'personally and substantially participated.

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000062

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    3/60

    The lifetime ban, however. is not appfieable to ru1emaking, general poUcies andpolicy formulation, or overarehlng programmatIc issues.Two-Year Ban (16 U.S.C, 2Q7(8)(21}. Also, as dIScussed In my previous letter,16 U.S.C. 2'07(a)(2) places a two-year ban o . n , a t t ~ m p 1 I n g to Influence Federal offioials.on behalf of another on particular matters that were under an emplOyee's officialresponsibility during your last year of"Govemmont $crvi.e. Particular matter he.S' thesame me.aning as 1ttat discussed ~ b o v e ~ t h e U f e ~ i ~ b a n . T h e f \ I I O ~ y e a T . ban beganon ~ b ) ( 6 ) Iand end's 6n ~ ) ( 6 ) J This banapplies'-even if you. did notpersonally participate lnths particular a t t ~ r . Ai, noted h, my previous letter. youf3hould be cautious in your post..Government employment activiti'es:in regarda to thisban, It applies even If you had no pe.rsonal knowledge of a partJcular matter to which aspeoific party was identified, as long as it wa$ pending undl\lr yOu'r o f f i o i ~ 1 responsibUltydUring YQur last year with the Government (5 C. F. R. 6 3 7 . 2 0 2 ' b ~ ( 4 ) ) , Under the bvo--yea'r ban, you will again be n a b ~ e to use anyparticular a t t ~ r ftoinclude sny c o n t r a e t $ ' ~ under your official responsibility durins the period of b ) ( 6 ) I

    ~ b ) ( 6 ) I'hreugh ~ b ) ( 6 ) _ Ias specific Ga$es to highligJ'1tcommon and r e ~ u r T i n 9 acquIsition challenges. Further.you will be unable to provide advice 8'nd assistance 10help resolve any issues pe.rtainingto particular matters under yourofficlaJ respons;ibnity,because suoh advice to Federal ernp.loyees or officers will be a representationprohibited by the statute.Like the lifetime ban. th& Mo-yearban Is not applioable torulemaking, generalpolicies and policy formulation, or overarchlng programmatic issues.In-h01e ~ s i s t a n c e i s not prohibited by either ban. A c e o t d ~ n g l y . yov may beable to B$slst b)(6 in its t;jeve!opmsnf of essons, for example, that include specifice x ~ t n p l e s that consl&tof particular matters i'n which you personalty an

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    4/60

    I .II -4II contemplate employment with ,another defense eontraetor within two years after yourF e ~ e r a l serviCeterminated, you need to requ6stanother ethics opinion: I may beI reached .at Kb )(6) @hqda.army;mil. .I . . s ; n c e . r ~ I V , .IIII Deputy General Counsel(Ethics &Fiscal)

    ~ n c t o s u r e

    ' -__ ..-..i.1__ . . . . ._ ...._:

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000064

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    5/60

    DEPARTMENT OF THE AfR FORCEAIR FORCE MATERIEL COMMAND LAW OFFICE (AF'MC.)

    WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE 9A1$ OHIO

    AFMCLO/CI. 16 D-Ee Z009Building 15., Rm 1301-864 41b StreetWrightPatterspr.l AFB OR" 454'337135[b)(6)

    - D e a r ~ _ b )_(6_)__This' } e ~ e r is provided in response to your recent request fotan authoritat!ve interpretation of theapplication of Secti(1D 423 of fitle 41, United States Code and as required under Station 847 Public Law1t0-1 81 t to 'your service as an official ofboD,. Briefly, 4'1 USC 423 prohibits certain fonner,employeesfrom aceepti0!:t compens-ation from a contractor for a period of 0ne year iftheyserved'incertain p o ~ i t j o n s or made certain decisions in connection with a contract awarded to t1)at contractor.Under thif! s ~ t u l e Designated Agency Ethics Officials and the,ir d o l e g a . ~ e s have ,the legal authQrity torender authoritative apinions regarding the applicability of the statute to,the .acecptanuof compensationfrolh contractors. Based on the information rhave rcc-eived from it is, m)' opinion that the statutewould not'restrict you from accepting compensation from any company,Be a . d v i s ~ tllat eqJ.ployees havlng u t i : e ~ ,invOlVing,s company ml,lst be disqualified from all suchdutieS', including'decision,making . :re:ndering'advit.e. making,recommondatIons, and monitoringcontractor IGtiv.ittes. before 'the)' begin to seek CInl>lwrnent with that oompany.This opinion addresses only re.slri-cUon6 that ,may. applyund.er 41 USC 4.23. Restrictions Ullder otherlaw's:(.e.g., '1.8 USC 207) have not been addrC3&e.i!'.inthili opinion. I"" particular. a c : t s ' d i s c u s s ~ d during,your yost-government emp-loyment legit! b.rlefing nvealel1 that the post__verrnoent m p l o y m ~ n t restrictions or Title 18, Urs.ned States Code"Se.dJoD '207(8)(1) and/ot Section :2.07(11)(2) apply 011eettaln c:o,ntrllet!l. Also, tbe one-year no-contact'pertod contained in 18 USC .207(c) applies to , y o ~ . The atta-ehed pamphlet is an e;(.platlation of 1$ USC 207. For further information or assIstance ,indetenninimr: what other restrictions may' apply, please eontacb)(6) "IO'f our organization atrb)(6)I

    b)(6)

    DirectorAttachments:1. Your Ltr. 9 Dec 092. 1.8' USC 2ffJ Request Formal3. One-Year N o ~ C o n t a c t Rule .

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000065

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    6/60

    DEPARTMENT O'F THE AI'R FORCEAIR: FORCE M A . T E : ~ I E L COMMAND LAW OF'F1C (AFM)

    W R I . G I : 1 . T " A T T e : ~ $ O k AIR FOA-CEo SASE OHIO

    APMO..ofCLBuilding 15, Rrn HO1!t64 41li StreetWrlghtPahe.rsoli APR OR 45433-7135

    Dear O l ! ; n e r a l ~ b ) ( 6 ) This leUer ill provlded.m response to your r ~ e a \ regllest for an autiloritat\v.eilllerpretation of the.llppl"ieltiol1 of

    S ~ l i o n 4 . 2 " 3 " o f T i d e 41, Dulled StaleS Code, 10 )'01>11 service I1S an offieiw-orKb)(61 aril:ny.41 USC 413 proMbflscertain formtr.employ.l':o$ !rom''llCceptlnlcampenslItlonCrom a COtltractor for P. period of "One yeaf if .!tIey served incertain posllie>l'lS ormade . c ~ r t a i n de41siohS in. o n n ~ o n with Ii C;Olltfact awarded 10 thlll conl1'.actot,Vnder t h i ~ smlUlt D ~ i g n a t e d A g ~ c y ' E t h i c s Officials and their d t l e g a l O e . ~ h a ' l t ~ the 11':80J au{horlt"y to render

    Iluthoritlltive- opinions reaarwog tho applicability of111e . t a t u ~ c . - t o the a'eeplallce."Of o m p e n ~ J ! . ( i O I l from l;Qn(roctor-6.B I l . I l ~ ( l on tbe [\'lformaeiolll h . a , , ~ r e ~ i v e d from y o ~ , jt.i$ my opinio,i I h i l ~ fhe &l.Blut$ would not restrict you fromacoepting'oompensation from a.llY company.

    Be IJMised thatcn\plo.Yf:es llQvillg d u l i c ~ inv-olvinga company intlst be disqualified from all sliCh duiiea.iacluding decision mAking. renderill& Ildvioe, (lU\king recommendations. and nXlIlitori"lIg COIlUlictor lIctivities, beforethey a,gin to see)r employmellr'with tJllll compllny.Ctlrrtnt ~ Q v e r l U 1 l e n t e m p J o y e e ~ (lncll,1ding those in Ii t ~ r : n J n . a J It'lllYe ~ I i l t u s " ) art: generally prohibiled by 1ausc2031205' from representln8 (throu.gb eorruntl1liclltion Or .ppe8-rl1nce) oilier i n d i v i d \ l a J ~ . compllnits. Of Mn-federal

    entltier betol'einf&lIlacal !SSIlPY;. In addition, the DoD General Counsel's o!lice issued gLlidtmc.e t'ltatllJ.l.291f2Q& m D ~ t , ".lmllH imeosBiblq't for Pcdeml n ~ O l l l l e l to w o r k J . Q U . ~ a c t o r in tQs Ilpder!iJ ~ r J m I A p e . includiog while 0D t e l ! : ! ' ! . . . [ ' : Q g . L f . ~ ~ ' W ~ m ! t ' ! b This:opinlo1\ addrcsse!l 0111)' relildotionsthat mnY'l1.pply-utldaf 4.1 USC 423. Restrictions utldermherlaws fe,g.,18 USC 207.) hav:e: not been IIddressed in fhill'opiniol1" ti l panicol".-, b e ' f a ~ l S cDlu.alnlid.ln YOUI!' lettersuggest .1Jlat the post-aO,..ernmeflt R-Illployment restrictions'of Title ltt, United f a ' ~ e $ ' C o d e ~ . s e d l o n 1 i 0 7 ( a ) ( ] ) a n d l o r 8-eetion 201(a)(1) ma, oP.plyto you with respettlbyeur .cpnteEnplilted llnlpl->ymeQ1 \:Y.ftb ROme 'companles, The. IJ.llClc/1cdp/ltnpnll!lt is an exp1.ftnatiO'n of 1"8 USC 2(r7. For'furt\1et'!nforJl\jllili)l1 or l & S i s t Q l ) ~ e in de_mln ins' whAt,otherrcstrictio.SUi may applY, piclIse oonlllctb)(6) . lof o t l r o r & a l ' l . i ~ r i o : n a I K b )(6) I

    b)(6)

    DirectorAttachments:1, YourLtr. ZO Noy{)82.18 USC 207 Pampltlet

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000066

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    7/60

    "."- DEPARTMENT OF TM e: AI R FORCEA I" FORCE' MATERIEl. . C O ~ M A N U L ~ W 0""" ' ( ; (AFMC)

    W R l . G ~ T - P A T T E R S O N AIR FORCE BAS,E OHIO,

    ..... .

    20 Novembet'2008AFMCLO/JAF2240 B t r e 6 t ~ Bldg 11Wdght.PattersonAfB OB 45433b)(6)

    Dear General ~ _ b ) _ ( 6 _ ) _Certain current or former DoD officials who, 'within two years of leav.ing DbD. expect toreceive compensation from.a defense c o n ~ r a c t o r [l\ust e q u e s . t ~ d reoeive a written oplnionregarding the a.pplica.bility ofpost.--ernployment restrictions. to activIties that an official mayundertake on bebalfofa detense contractor before .receiving pay. This requirement is in Section847 CJftl1e Nati9nal D ~ f e O ! l e A u t h o r i ~ t i o . n Aettbr Fis'cal Year 2008 (Pl,ib. L. 11.0-181). ttapplies if you are a current or former 61 officiai who partir.ipa,ted personally and substantiaUyin an acquhition with a value in excess o'f$lOMwhilcservingin: (1) an El

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    8/60

    Other post-employntent laws and regulations could potentially restrict the type ofworkyou lnay perfom fora.ny ~ p e c t i v e employer. These are discussed in detail in the materialstitled ' M R l J l ~ ODlQbHurlf.t;.Md Post-Government imployment (gOt! 08), which J providedto you during our briefing of b)(6) r .These p o . ~ t e m p t o y m e ' ( l t statutes earry crimInal sanctiDns and can be 'confusing.Accordingly, if you have any questions or need more specific adviocl even after YC1U leave DoDs e t v i c e ~ please contact me or any ethics cowlSelor i.n thisotlice at Kb)(6) I

    Very Respe.etfuUy

    Ethics Attor.neyAcquisition U1tcgntyD1vis}on

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000068

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    9/60

    DEPARTM:ENT OF THE ARMYOFFice OF' THE GI:NE.RAl. COUNSEL. '104 ARMY PENTAGONWASHINGTON DC 20310.ot04

    January 5. 2009

    Re: Post..Employment Re$trlction8/Sectlon 841O e a r ~ _ b ) ( _ 6 ) __

    As you In1end to terminate DoD service on b ) ( 6 ) Iwe are provIding youwlth this oplnlonooncerning your p o s t - - e m p l o y t l 1 e o t . a c t i v i t i e ~ Wfth your new employer.,~ b ) ( 6 ) I

    There are a number of restrictions applicable to your p o s t ~ G o v e r n m e n t employment activit1es. 1want to emphasize recent restrictions imposed by section 847oHhe National Defense Authortzatlon Ad. for Fiscal Year 2008 (PUb. L 110-181).Certain current or former DoD offICials. Yiho Within two yean; of Ie.avlng DoD expect toreceive compensation from a defense.contractor, mOst reque.st and receive a wrIttenopinion regarding the apprlcabiUty of post...,mployme.nt restrictions to activities thatofficial may undertake on bt:Jhalf of a defensocontractor before receiving pay. It app/.iesIfyou are a current or former 000 official who participated personally and substantiallyIn an acquisition with a vatue in excess of$10M whiJe serving In: (1) an ExecutiveSchedule position: (2) a Senior Executive S ~ r v i c e p o s l t i ~ n ; (.3) a g'eneral or flag officerposition; or (4) fn a position of program manager. procuring tontractJng officer,administrative c o n t r 8 c d n g . o f f i c e t f s ~ c e ~ I e c t l o n atdhotlty. member of the sourceseleotlon evaluation board. or chIef of a financial or technlcaJ e v a ' u ~ t l o t i team.

    YQU served in one of these covered positions. that is in an E:xecutfv& Schedulep o s f t i o n ~ )'OU p ~ o n a l l y ' arnj .subSt$lti8I1y partlclpatedln the aogufsttton life cycle ofan acqutsltlon valued In'excess of $1 OM. Thlsisthe b)(6) explained ingreater detail t.\erein. Acoordln.gly, you are reqUired to receive an- etliltlS opinion thataddresseS post-Government employment restrfCttons as they parts.n to youremployment with b ) ( 6 ) I .

    My advice wi1h respect tp these matters Is iidvlsory only and is provided inaCC6rdancewith section 2635.101 of Title 5, Code ofFederal R e g u I 8 t ~ o n S . I amproviding this advIce In my offiCial capacity; on b e h 8 1 ~ of theUnited States. a.nd not asJ g ~ { ~ ~ e r e s ~ ~ ~ ~ t i . ~ : : : : ~ ~ I ~ n ~ r : ~ I : : > , w : r t i ? ~ ~ & 4 ~ w . ' f 1 t r g . e c r ! i Y a ~ J ~ ~ ' i ~ : r w ~ ~ \ ! ! ! : J ! ~ = " ! ' " ' t ! ! 5

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000069

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    10/60

    -2

    ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - - , - __ , . . . . . . . " . . , . . - - - - , - - " - - - , - . . . . . . . , , . - . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . , . , . . , . . ~ ~ ~ = . . : t = = = = = = = = : : : : : ; 1rior toYou'--;:::;=;::::;::;:;===:::;----'

    . You wHl terminate your current PQsitlon as b)(6) on b)(6) and u~ n d 10 start your new employment a b)(6). f b)(6 on b)(6 .~ Is a service contractor with th.&Kb )(6) Iand other milita departments. Yousigned a Notice of Disqua.llflcation memorandum on b)(6) indicating that youintended to seekemployment with b (6) I have met with youmultiple times on post-Govemment employment issu&S. startl.ng in b ) ( 6 ) IThe Ihformatlon you have provided during these meetings. pius positron descrIptions.statutory requirements, and HQDA Gelleral.Order (G.O.) No.3. 9 July 2002, provide thefactual basis forthis opinion.PisliUlsJen. Once an individual has left Govemmentservice., thare Is a wIdearray Of post.employment re,strictions that.are applicable to:former G'ovarnmentemployees. The following is a syn6psis of these 81)pltcable restrictions.Tille 11. Y,QItOd Stattl cm.te. _lonill 1-8.'y..q. 207). The primarysource of o s t ~ G o ~ m m e n t e m p t o y m e n t r e $ t r i e t J o n s or former Fedefa;l employees orofficers Is found at 18 U.S.C. Z07. The intent of'thls statute is to p r e v e n t f ~ r m e r Government employees or officers from exerting undue influence gained from .Government employment and using Information gained wh.ile working for theGovernment to unfairly benefit anew employer, None Ofthe provisions bar anyIndividual, regardless of rank or posltio.n, 'rom acceptlnge.mplQYinent with anyprivate or public ertlployet aftor GOYfmment service. Sectton.207 only prohibIts

    Individuals from enfaging In cert.fn actlvltres on b9h,lf of persOns or entitiesother than the United States, whether ornot done for compensation. None of herestrictions bar self-representation.Lifetime bin. Title 18. U.S.C. 201(a), pieces a permanent. I I f e ~ t i m e ban on

    1 Q 1 Q 1 g _ ~ I L J i ~ Q ; ~ ~ J ' r a i @ Q l . Q Q e t _ . ' l l i t 1 ' 1 9 Q . Q i ! ~ 9 ! E ! M i l l 1 . ( j l l !'""7'ere, , - @

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000070

    mailto:1Q1Q1g_~ILJi%E7%BE%91;~~J'[email protected]_.'llit1'19mailto:1Q1Q1g_~ILJi%E7%BE%91;~~J'[email protected]_.'llit1'19
  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    11/60

    Specifically, the statute prescribes criminal penalties for any employee or offlcer whO,after he terminates hIs employment. knowingly makes, with the Intent to influence, anycommunication with or appearance before any person employed by the United States,on behalf of another In connection with a paiflcUlar matter. The particular matter mustbe one In which (a) the United States Is a party or has a direct and slJbstantiaJ fnterest;(b) the person partldpated personally and sub$tantially.as an employee or officer; and(c) there was a specific party Involved at 1he time of such participatIon.

    To participate "'personally means directly, and includespartic:lpation of asubordinate if actually directed by you fn fhematter.."'Substantially" means that your Involvement is ofstgnificance to the matter. orforms a basis fora reasonable appearance of such slgnificar'lC8. It requires more thanofficial responslblfity., knowledge, perfunotory Involvement,.ot InVolvement on anadmInistrative or peripheral rssue. A finding of substantiality may be b'ased not only onthe effort devoted to a matte'r, buron the irnportanceoftheeffort, While.s series ofperipheral inv()lvement$ may be InSUbstantial, the single act ofapprOvIng may besullslanUal. In addItion to approval..other acts may arsobe cons.ldered "substantial,"such ,as parUcipation in a critical step.

    The term ~ p a r t l c u l a r . m a t t $ f " Includes any Investigation. application. request fora ruling or determination, rul$making. contract, c o n t t o v ~ r s y , claim, charge, a c c l : J ~ \ i o n , arrest, or Judicial or other proceedIng, General rule-making Is usually excluded from theterm "particular maflel', 5inoo general rule--making seldom involves specific part1e.s.C-onsequently.lt is pO$sJble that an empJoyee who partlclpated In a u l e ~ m a k l n 9 whiteemployed by the Government will. after leaving Government service. be able 10 appearbefore his former agency concerning the application of the rule to his new private sectoremployer without vlol,ating the tlfeUme restrictions. The term does not encompass anymatter before the Government; only those matters that arIse to partfoularmatters.rho provision reqUires that anemployee"s off1cial p a r t i Q i p a i j ~ n In ap.articularmatter must have takan p l ~ c e at a time when the matter involved a non-Federal p a r t ~

    '(01' parties) ( a J t h o u ~ h these can be different partIes from .. those tnvolved with "the matterat the time of the employee's participation).. .The term "Influence" tncludes any communication to a F e d ~ r a l employee thatmay be intecprsted as an attempt to. persuade that employee to take aotioTi. TherestrIction prohibits only th()6e communiCations 's'nd appearance, that aremade "withthe Intent totn1tuence'" A ...eortlmunlcatlon" can be made orally, inwrillng. orllJrough

    electronic' transmission. An "appearance" extends to a former employee's merephysical presen.ce at a proceeding when the circumstances ma:ke it Clear that hisattendance Is intended to inftuence the United States. An "intent to Influence" theUnited Staws m.ay be found if the commurilcatlon or appesran'oe Is made for thepurpose of seeking a i s c r e t i ~ n a r y G?vemment rul1ng. b a n e ~ t . approval, or o.ther action. ,Ii i Q t ~ I ~ ~ " ' u A i g ~ M W 9 L - ~ q _ I . I ! J J ! ! " ! ! !

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000071

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    12/60

    -4

    which the. former employee knows involves an appreciable element of disputeconcerning the particular Government action to bf) taken.Accordingly, "the prohibition is InappUcable to an appearanoe or communicationinvolving purely social contacts, a request for publicly available documents, or a requestfor purely factual information or the supplying of suCh Information. Behlnd-lhe ..scenesor in;.house assistance tesa priyate employer is legally permissible. Although you areunable to telephone, sign yout name to 8 letter addressed to, or attend a a e ~ i n g with.a Govemment offiCial, you may legally tell your emploY,er the name of the Governmentemployee to callar wrIte, or with whom to meet.

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000072

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    13/60

    -5ovemance 'of this program, These changes haw included b ) ( 6 ) "....,.1-;-:-:--_

    . . . . . : = - c ~ - " " - " ' - - ' - = : . . . . : . . : ; including changes In contract incentlv.es. TheKb)(6) I i S ~ c . . . . : . b ) . . : . . . . . , ( 6 ) : . . . . . . , - - _ b)(6) Such recommendations constitute persona.1 and substantial partIcipation Ina particular matter.

    Aocordlng!Y, t h e ~ representatIon ban of 18 US:Cm{a){1) Is applicable to you as)(6) lof b)(6 SO you may not represent for the Iifiitime of the$eparticular malters. You are also prohibited from representlhg any other 'non ..Federalentity (not just tho prime or sub ..contsctorsassociated with these actions) before any.E.xecuflVe (or Judicial) Branch employee, .

    Please note that this list in not meant to be exclusive or e)(ihaustlve. There maybe other particular matlersln which you personally and sUbstantially participated. Youshould be sensl"tive to other matters in which you personally participated and bring themto our attention fOr further consideration and a n a ~ y s t s . TWo-year !MD'. Under the provjsbnsof 18 U.S.C. 207(a)(2). you have a twoyear ban on attempting to influence Federal offiCials Or! behalf of n o t h e r on partlcularmatters that were under your official responsibility d.urlng your last year ofGovernmentservica. The two-year ban begins to run When your Federal employmenUerminatesand applies even If you did not personally parttdpate lO the matter. Again, thIs banapplies to repre$entlng another party before the United States. with intent to infl.uerice.Behlnd...the.seerl"$S or In-house &sslslance is legally permissible.

    "Official responsibility" I ' defined as the direct administrative or 'operatingauthorlty. whether intermediate or final r and either exercisable alone or with others, toapprove, disapprove, or otherwise direct Government action. Accordingly, a matter Isunder your "official responsibility if yOU hadthe power, either dlrecttyor ~ l r o u 9 h asubordinate. to approve, disapprove. or otherwise direct -a Govemment action. Thoseareas assigned boy statute; regulation, executive order. or job cfescription usuallydetermin.e the scope of ao employee"s official responslblUty. All particular matters underconsideration in an agency are under the official responslbitlty of the agency head, andeach is under that of any lniermediate supervlsOr having r.$ponSlbllitY fo r the activitiesof a subordinate employee who a c t u ~ l l y partiolpates In the matter.

    A matter was -actually pending" under aforl'Tierempl.oyee's officialresponsibility if the matter was in fact 'referred to or under consideration by personswithin the emp:loyee's a r ~ a of responsibility. It is t m p o r t ~ n t to n o t ~ . t h a t unlike section207'(a)( 1). this restriction Is t r l g g ~ r e d simPlY by virtue of the fact that the particularmatter was ~ n d i n g under your official responsIbility..

    Apolicability of 18 Y.$,C. 207(a){2) to your pcgsoQGtiye WDploymQnt. You$hould De cautious 11'1 your post-Govemmentempfoym.ent aetivltfe.s In regard$ to thispartlcular ban ..This ban appli$S eYeA if you had no person811

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    14/60

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    -6

    official responsibility duringyolJr last year with the Government (5 C. F. R. 2637.202(b )(4n.Ordinarily, the, scope of an eli1ployee'ls offlclal responsibll,ity i$ determined bythose functions assigned by statute, regulation, Executive order. job desctiptlon. Ordelegation of authority. AU partioular matters und.er consideration In an 'agency areunder the official responsibility of the agency head and each is underlhat of anyIntermediate supervisor whO supervlses a person, including a subordinate. who actuallyparticIpates In the matter or who has been assigned t o p ~ r t t c J p a t e In the matter withinthe scope of his official duties. In your situation. you aCtuallv oerformed duties in Kb)(6) Idifferent posmons during your last year of Federal service: ~ ) ( 6 ) and .

    Kb)(6) . I As sUCh, the' two-year ban is p p ~ to all particular matters underyour oMelet responsibility during your tenure a s ~ a n d K b ) ( 6 ) . land as)(6) I

    You notEd that .the s t a t ! J ' : ~ . f : # i i D O l ~ limite to duties assl ned b the b)(6)b)(6) Wemust. therefore, look to the as'stgnment of responsibilitIes and authorttles by b)(~ b ) ( 6 ) I Therefore, If h e ~ b ) ( 6 ) 1 assigned you s()me type of rt)Sponsibility (e.g..oversight or direction of a par1'icvlar m.atter) even though under another's official

    ~ r e s o o n 5 i b j l f ' t y , that particular matteralsowouJd be undel"@uroreialresponslblllty.~ b ) ( 6 ) .also prescribes broatf'overel9ht duties for the b)(6)

    Moreover, sect10n ~ b ) ( 6 I N a U o n a l Defense Authorization Act FIscal Year 2008,adds new statutory responslbiUti8$ ,and prOVides that, "the b)(6)department in assigning duties and authorities 'under parag'-rap----::-r:-."""'----sT"a----"---d'--es"7:-;j;-gn----'a--.Je the~ b ) ( 6 ) lof such military department to have primary managementresponsibtlity tbr busIness operationS . ~ known In thEli performance of such duUesasthe Chief M a n ~ g e m a n t Officer... The Kb 6 . responsibiltUes arestatutQfY. and you havebeen InvolYed in 'fo:Ufatlno the charterfot the position otKb)(6) ~ IncludIng therelationship with' the ~ ) ( 6 )

    In the role of ( 6 ) lyouhad defined statuto authoritIes' andresponsibilities 'undellb)(6) ~ . /a : b)(6) also delineates ,pecfficf' ion of the (b)(6) IYourrot.eas b)(6) wS$

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    15/60

    -7

    ~ b ) ( 6 ) Iduring your lastj'!!r of Government service. AcOOrdlngly, you areprohibited from representingK.liliJ(or any other non-Federal entity) on thi.s particularmatter for a two year period beginning on b ) ( 6 ) IOther examPles of particular matters under your official responsibUlty during yourtenure a $ ~ b ) ( 6 ) Iand Kb)(6) . IlneiUde actions taken under your direction to respond tballegations from the OoDfG and ab)(6) that U,S .. Armyb 6 Testing tilndanalyses were done under your official responSlbilit A third 9xampie. during this titneframe Involved ur actin as b)(6) forthe b)(6) In the matter of b) 6the b)(6)

    Kb)(6) if to support a production and fielding decision,Under your direction and responslblRty, the Army chose to pursue an alternate statutoryb 6) and O$ad that the Secreta determine hecould b)(6)b)(6) These are only a few examples of the many partfcular matters thatwere under 0 clafresponslbtlity during your last year ofGovetnment $lervice. As wehave dfsoussed. this ban will include _II' sartijU'ar matters for which the Secretaryassigned offiCial responslbtnty to.you as b)(6) and!b)(6) ~ and all particular a t t ~ r s pending under the official respons.ibillty of h e ~ fWhUe you occupl.ed thtsposition during your last year ofservice.

    pn,-vear Trade or TrntvAM'@t!!fS! ~ , Title 18 U.S,C. 207(b) providesthat for'a period of one-year after leaving Government.servlce.former employees orofflcel"S may no1 knowingly represent, aid, or advise someone else on the basis ofcovered information. concerning any ongoing trade or treaty negotiation in whIch theemployee partlci'pated p ~ r s o n a l l y and substantially In his or her last year of service.This one-year ben applies to all employees; It Is not limited to senior offloials. Tradenegotiations are those undertaken pursuant t() the OmnIbus Trade and 'CompetltlvenessAct of 1988. (19 U.S.C. 2902) Treaties are 'Internatiomit agrsemelits that require. theadvice and conse.nt ofthe Senate. "Covered infoi'Ttlation" Is information found in agencyrecords accessible to Ute employee but exempt from dlwlosure under-the Freedom ofIl1formation Act. Based upon our discussIons and your dutiesI this ban is Ina.ppllca:ble toyour post-Govemment employment activities.One-vear "Cooilug-OfC,Pe!Nd. Title 18, U;S.C. ' 207(c;). is a one-year coolingoff'pertod, appUcableto senior officials, It prQhiblts.you ' f r o m r e p r e s ~ n t l n g anotherbefore your forMer agency, In this instance all of 000 Including the other militarydepartments,onartymatter. During the first-year after your dep$r1ute from the pOsition

    of USA. you may not communicate to ot appear befora any DoD emploYee.j departme.nf,or agencYI with the Intent to Influence, on behalf of anyott1er person and In connectionwith any matter In which official action by any officer or employee In 000 Is sought.This parlod is designed to prevent any appears.noe that former senior OfflCEJrs are ableto Influence govemment decisIon improper1y because of their fortner senior positions.! ..1;4:@ i J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ l i g ~ ! ~

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000075

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    16/60

    8 ..(2), which pertain to particular matters, .f8 U.S.C. 2D7(c) pertains to any matter InwhIch offielal sat/on by a DoD officer Of employee is soughf.

    The tenn Jllnfluence" includes any communlcatton to a Federal employee thatcould be interpreted 10 be an attempt to persuade that employee to fake action. Therestriction prohibits only those communloations and appearances that are made "withthe intent to int1\Jsnce: A "communicatl'on" can be made orally, In writing, orthroughelectronIc transmission. An appearance" extends to a former employee's mSrephysical p ~ e s e n c e at a proceeding when the ctrcumstances make It cf!l'ar that hisattendance is 'ntended to influence the UnIted Stat$S. An '"Intent lei Inftuencell theUnited .States ma.y be found If the communfca.tlon or appearance: is made for thepurpose of seektnga.discretfonmy Government ruling. benefit. a p p r o a l ~ or other action.or is made for the purpose of Influencing Govemment aotton in connectIon with a matterwhich the former employee knOws InvolveS'an appredable element of disputeconcerning the particular Government actiOn to be taken. A c c o r d l n g l y ~ the prohlbltl.on [sinapplicable to an appearance or communication Involving purely socIal contacts, 'arequest for pu.b1lcly avallabfe documents, or'a request for purety'facb,Ja.llnformation orthe supplyfng of Suoh information. "Behlnd..the-sool"tes" or fn-hou8e" assistance to aprivate emploYer ISlegaUy permissible. Although you are unable to telephone, siQn yourname to a letter addressed to, or attend a mesting with, a Government Qfflclal, you maylegally tell your employer the name of the GovernmentemploY$8 to call or r i t ~ , or withwhom to meet.6RpJigapltity 2118 U,S.C. 2Q7{Q) 10 ygur prosoeqfiw gutis. As we discussed,the one year cooling off period' is applicable starting ~ f t e r termination of your service as

    ~ b ) ( 6 ) Iand appttc8bteto any representatlbn of another before anymember or employee of 000. This provlsfon Is very broad In its appUc.atlon as it relatesto communications with or appearances b e ~ DoD employees. Forexample. you willbe unable to attend meetings on b e h ~ ( f of at whieh 000 employees are also inattendance, even tho4gh you do not speak.

    Beftr(ctlOn on [_ Isut la" or,lr:IlagforeiQn.fI1tltlf!. Title 18 U . S ~ C . 207(f) p.rovides that, for a perlod.of one yaar after leaVing a senlor position, 'formersenior employees or Qfftcers may not knowingly Wltti the intent-to InfliJencea decision of.anemployee ofa de.partmentoragencyofthe n l ~ e d States in carrying out his offidalduties, represent a foreign 'entlty before any d ~ p a r t m e n t o r ' a f l e n ~ y of the United States,at aId or advise a o r ~ t g n entIty. The restriction is e a $ u r e d from the date when anemployee ~ s e s to be a senior employee, not from the tertninatlon of Governmentservice, unless the tWo occur simultaneously. This restriction prohibits a former seniorofficial from representing, aIding. or advising a foreign entity with the Intent to influenceceftajn governmental offictaJs.

    A "foreign entity" means the government ota foreign country as defined insection 1(e) of the Forel\Jn Ag'$nts Registration Act ot 1938 (22 U.S.C. 611) or a11 M!!!!I,! ; ; i ! " ' ; i l i Q ~ l l s g J ~ ~ : . ~ { g . W M g " ! f Q . g Q ~ ~ ~ ~ Q . t ' ' ! n ' S ! !

    ........._--..._----_.._.-

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000076

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    17/60

    ..g...

    group of perSDns exercIsing sovereign de fscto or de jure political JurisdictIon over anycountt)' (other than the United States) or any part of such country,and InOludes any .subdivision of any such group and any group or agency to whIch such sovereign defacto or de jure authority or funcUons are directly or indirectlydeJegated.A "foreign poUtica\ party" Includes any organization or any other combinatIon ofIndividuals in a country (other than the UnIted States), or any unit or branch thereof.having for an aim or purpose, or which is engaged In any activity devoted I.n whole or Inpart to, the establishment, administration, control . or acqufsition of d m i n l ~ t r a t i o n ()rcontrol. of a government of a foreign country or a subdMslon thereof, or thefurtheranceor Influencing of the political or public interests, polIcies, or re1ations of a government ofa foreign COUfttry or a t J b d l v l s ~ o n thereof. A foreign commercial corporation wtll notgenerally be considered a "foreign entity" for purposes of Section 207(f) unless Itexercises the functions of a soverelgn.A former senior official represents a foreign entity when he acts as an agent orattorney for or otherwise communlcatesor makes an appearance on behalf ofthafentltyto or before any employee of a department or agency. He "alds or advlses"a foreignentity when he assists the entity other thart by making ~ u c h a communication orappearance. J71ls ban Isbroader than that found In 18 U.S.C. f 2fJ1(a) and (cJbecause It also prohibits behlnd..the-scene asslstence, I f such advice or aid Isrendered with thfllntent to 'nnuence an o"iclal discretionary decision ofa currentFede,.' departmenfal or agency emp'oyee. Such behlnd-1he-scenee assistance to aforeign entity could, for example,. inelude draftlng a. pr()pOSed communJoati.on to anB.gency, advising on an appearance before a department, or consulting on atherstrategies designed to persuade c;lepartmentai oragency decision m a ~ e r s to takecertain action. Again, s\lch representation. aid, or advice is onlyprohfbited If made orrendered with the inlent to Influence an offiCial discretionary deelslon of a currentFederal employee. Unlike. the prohibitions found in 18 U.S.C. 207(a) and (0), section207(f) prohibits e p r e s e n t ~ t i 6 n b e f ~ C o n g T ~ s s .

    Exceptions. There are exceptions to the restrictions in 18 U.S.C . 207,Including aC1S pursuant to official U.S. G ~ v e r n m e n t duties, and aiding, advising, andrepresenting certain intemaltonal organizations With,.prtor .8ecretaryof State~ r t i f i c a t i o n . RestrictIons under te U.S.c. 207(c).do not apply to employees of.stateor local Governments, hospitals, medical r ~ s e a r c h Qrganlzatlons, .or degrea-grantinginstitutions of higher leamlng, when makIng repre$entatlons on those InstltLttlons' behalf.Additionally. If individuals are notcompensated, they may make statements based ,onspecial knowledg.e. Restrictions based on 18 U . S ~ C . 2b7(a)-and (c). which apply tocommunications that furnish scientific or teehnlc:allnforrnation. may be waived by thesecretary of Defense. There are special rules regarding testimony under oath. Pleaseconsult this office for further guidance.

    None of the above restrictions prohibits you from aoceptlng any employment with1f i I I l . . Q ; { f R , Q . Q ' 4 1 ~ J a J ' ~ , I 9 P W ~ l l l l i l ~ ~ 1 i i Y 4 m ; f j Q _ e e ! f ! ! t : ! ! ! ! 1

    ' ' )

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000077

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    18/60

    -10

    employment a e t i v l t i e s ~ s u c h as representing. aidlng, 'or advising anothe.r In c o n ~ e c t i o n with certain 'offi.Clal matters-not to the mere fact of being employe(i l)y any partIcularentity. Additionally. none of the restrictions outlined 'above proh[bUs a former ~ e o u t i v e branch employee from representing others before Congress. Self-representatlOnorlheexpression of personal views,that.a.re not advanced'as ',agent or representative' ofanother p,erson. whether or noUhose vtews are speciflcatly soliolted by the Government1is permissible. Nor da the restrletlons outlined above 'prohIbit communications orcontacts that are not made with the intent to influence the Government, such as~ u e s t s for the s t a t ~ s ofa matts'ror for publlely available information.

    In addition to the above proscriptions imposed by is, U.S.C. 207. there,areother statutory and regulatory restrictions applttable to post-GOVerhment employment.These are discussed below: ', ..

    ~ g m p e n s a t l o n restriction.. 1'8 U.S.C. I' 2 p ~ . There, is B proJ'libltion against'sharing in any compensatioh for representatIonal services before the Government,rendered personally or by another at a time when the former employee was stlUemployed by the Government. Accordingly, after you leave Govemment servIce, youmay not accept compensation for representational services. whiCh were provided byanyone while you were a Government employee. befOre a FederaJ agency or courtregarding particular matters in which the Governm'ent we,s a party or had's substantialinterest. This prohibttio,n may affect you .when you leave the Governmen,t and.$hare Inthe proceeds of a PQTtnership or buslnsssfor representational services that oepur-redbefore you terminated Federal service. (Examples, Of such repi'esentaUonal, activitiesinclude lobbyfnt. 'conSUlting, a n ~ employment by law firms). This rastrtction Islnapplicable to you. based on 'ourdisous:sions and your compsflSat}on pI'an.(!rQcyrement Integrity AcL 'ndte that the Procurement lntegrit)' Act placesrestrictions on 1he acceptance of compensation from a cOntractor. It specifically providesthat ,9 former officer may not accept compensation as an employee of c o n t r ~ C l : o r within aone-year period If the,former otncer: (1) s(:Jf'Ved. at 'time of seleetton of the 'contractor ortime ofaward, as tI1e procuring contracting officer. ,source 'selection authority. a member rIthe souruli.!setectton evaluatlon bOard, or chief of a financial or 'technical evaluation team Ina procurement In excess of $10 mJllion; or (2) served as a program'manager for a contractin excess of $1 0 million; or (3) personally made a e c ~ s l o n to award a contract or taskorder or delivery order in excessof$10 million to the' o n t r a e t o r ~ to establish ratesapplicable to a contract or contracts for ,tha.tcontractor that are valued in excess of $10 'mfllton. A program manager is one who actively manages the prGlgram cost. performance,and SGhedule.l'egardless of the title given to the Individual. ,A Federal official who fits,

    within one of these categories, however, is not prohIbited from accepting compensationfrom 'any division or affiliate of a contractor, so long 'as that diVision or affiliate does notproduce the same or similar products or services. Based on our disaJssfol'$ and y.ourduties. you did not serve in any of the above posftfo.n1:i, 'so tAa comp.ensatlonban doe-snotapply to you. '

    .. ,..' .:

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000078

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    19/60

    ~ 1 1 ~

    ~ c t i o n &47. Should you leave your prospective position with ~ b ) ( Iand obtainemployment with any other defense contractor withIn the two-year period after you depart000 service. you are required to seek ano1her ethics opinion.

    yS'8 of Informa!ion. You are reminded that yoiJ a ~ precluded from usingInformation gained while eMployed by the Army that is generally not avanabte to the public,(for example, proprietary or source selectlonlnfonnatlon, If the use of that ~ I n s l d e " infonnation would give you or anyone else an uhfalr financial or commercial advantage.Additionally, 18 U.S.C. 193 and 794 protect and prohibit the use or disclosure of trade.secrets, confidential business information, andclassified in.formatlon. Further restrictionsare imposed by 10 U.S.C. 130.publlc. Fln,anclal DJS{9.Iure Report. You are req'ulred to a P ~ b t i ' C FinancialDlsclosore Report, SF 2:78. within 30 d$Ys C)f y o ~ r final" day or'Government service in acovered posman. In adrjftion. you are required to file an annual art cove all ofcalendar year200B. As you are leavthg Government service on b)(6) you rnayfile a combination annual andterminatioli report, WhlCh o o ~ r s all of b)(6) .and runsthrough Kb)(6) Iordinarily, we would recommend ttiat you try to comptete yourreport before Ieav.tng your position SO that W$ can review It in draft, resolve any issues. andhave you sign it electronically In the Financial DisclOsure Management '(FDM) system onyour lastday. The timing of your departure may make'th1s course of action p r o b ~ m a t l c because you wililikelybe waiting for end-of-year financial statements In ordar to completethe report. In any event, the r ~ p o r t w l l l be dueon 5 February 2009. The DesignatedAgency Ethics.Official. the General Counsel, can grantan extension of time up to 45 daysbeyond 5 ~ b r u : a r y . You may access FDM through 'your AKO account using your currentpassword for 180 days after leaving the Department. 'Please contact me If there are changes in your work plans or asslgnment .so that rcan amend this advice, If necessary. Do not" hesftate to contact me at any tlme with. u e s t i o n s that may pertain to these poSt-employment r e s t r l c t l o n 8 ~ I may be reached at

    K ~ , , < 6 ) ~ h g d a . a r m v ! m i l ] a n d ~ b )(6) I T I : I ~ n k you for your service to o ~ r nation, .b)(6)

    Deputy'General Counsel(Ethics & Fiscal)

    '.'

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000079

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    20/60

    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCEHEADQUARTIRI EI"ICTRONIC n8TSM8 (AFMC)HAH8COM AIR FORCE IAt l !MA8IACHUSEnS""...AI.HRC.

    ~ b ) ( 6 )

    SClJA3 ' Hamilton StreetHanscom AFB MA 01731-2010

    [b)(6) IDear , - , - b)- '- '(6)'---_1. InfroduetioD. This letter is provided in response to your reccntrcqucst for an authoritativointerpretation of the application of Section 423 ofTitle 41, United States Code, to your service asan official of the Department of Defense. Under this statute, Designated Agency Etbics Officialsand their delegatees have the legal authority to render authoritative opinions 1egan1ing theapplicability of the statute to your acceptance '?fcompensation from contractors. As discussedbelow, it is my opinion. that, with exception f ~ ) ( 6 ) 141 U.S.C. 423 does not placerestrictions on youremployment options with defense contractors. The 18 U.S.C. 1207 .representation ban may apply in your circumstances. Keep in mind that this lettor is not anopinion as to the application ofthe 18 U.S.C. 207 representation ban.2. The 41 u.s.c.I 423(d) t'One-Year Compensation Ban."

    a. Application lener8Dy. Under 41 U.S.c. 423(d). certain fonner Oovernmentemployees are. prohibited from accepting compensatiOn froIll II. contractor for a period (If oneyear if they served in cel1ajn positions or made certain decisions in connection with a contractawarded to that contractor. This is commonly referred to as the "one-year compensation ban."This ban can apply to military officers. enlisted personnel, civilian employees, and specialGovernment employees. [FAR 3.104-1] It can apply regardless of whether one retires, ",signs,or separates from the Govemment. Also,the barlcan apply in connection with bothcompetitively awarded ~ o n t r a c t s and non-competitively awarded (i.e., sole source) contracts.[FAR 3.104-3(dXI)] Attachment 1 to this letter lists the circumstances under which thecompensation ban arises.b. What Is prohibitedby the on&-year baL The one-year ban applies to accepting

    compensation as an employee. officer. director, or consultantof the contractor."Compensation"'means wages, salaries, honor8.ria, commissions.. professional fees. and anyother fonnofcompellsation, provideddlrectly or indtl1.'Ctly, foe services eendeIed.Compensation is indirectly provided if it is paid to an entity other than the individual,specificall'y in exchange for services provided by the individual. iFAR 3.]04-1]

    AlUma',A.lr Foree - No On.Com" ewe .

    ,. " .. ~ - - - - .- _-_ ....

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000080

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    21/60

    Prior to the of b 6u . . . . . < , . > - ~ = ? L . . : : . . : o u = - - w : . : . . : e : : : : ; r e the b)(6) of the b)(6) h e t = w L . > . . : e e : : . L . n r , ; = ~ b 7 7 . ) ( 6 ~ ) : : ! . . . . - - - 1

    ~ ~ _ - - - - : - r . ~ ~ = : . L . . . . = . . I E : . = n = i o = . , n that. based upon the information you have provided, .that withthe exception of b)(6) you are notrestrioted under 41 U.S.C. 423 from acceptingcompensation from any other defense contractor. This office has previou$ly insttucted youre aroin the conflict of interest provisionsof 18 U.S.C. 208(a) and seeking employment withb)(6) If, after ou retire, your ihdividual circumstances lead you to seekemployment with b)(6) (theKb)(6) II recommendobtaining a second, more tailored, interpretation of the application of 41 U.S.C. 423; this wouldinclude 8 specific identification of the p r o s p c c t h e ~ b ) ( 6 ) ~ v i s i o n and job description.3. The 18 U.8.C. 207 I ~ R e p r e s e n t a t i o n Ban." Your previous duties as the b ) ( 6 ) loft h e ~ b )(6) /may trigger other o s t ~ G o v e m m e n ~ employment restrictionsunder what is commonly referred to as the representation ban.

    a. Ufetime representation ban. Section 207(a)(l) of TitJe 18, U.S.C., provides that anEx.ecutive Branch officer or e m p l o ~ who haa, in his offidal capacity. participatedpel'SonaUyand substantially in a particular matter. including aGovernment contract, which involved 11specific party or parties at the time of 8uchpmticipation, may not, at any time thereafter.knowingly make any communication to or appearance before any officer (X employeeof the .United States or the District of Columbia. with the intent to influence such officeror employee.in connection with such Government contract or other particular mlltter. on behalfof any penonother than the UnitedStates or the DistrictofCdumbia. This is known as the "lifetimerepresentation bant" as it applies to the lifetime of the particular matter. The target of thisprovision is the fonner employee who participates in a matter while employed by theOo"emment and who later "switches sidesu by teprescnting another person on. the' same matterbefore the United States. Bued upon the infonnation you have proVided, intended employmentwith aKb)(6) Imay concern the same particular matter(s) in which you participatedpersonally and substantially while serving as an officer in the Air Force. If so. the lifetimerepresentation ban may apply for the l i f ~ t i m e of that panicullU" matter. For your reference, theterm "particular matter" would include any investigation, application. request for a mling ordetetmination, rolemaJdng, contract, conlrOver&y, claim, chlU"ge, accusation, arrest, or judicial oretherproceeding. Additionally. in detennining whether two situations are part of the samepanicular matter. one would consider alilelevant factors. including the amount of time elapsedand the extent to which the malters involve the same basic facts or issues and the same or relatedparties. Please be aware thot the Department of the Air Force does not havcauthority to issueauthoritative opinions on 18 U.S.C. 207. 88 this is a federal criminal statute the interpretation ofwhich falls under the jurisdiction of the Department of Justice.

    111111111111111---'''

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000081

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    22/60

    b. Two-year retJireseD.tatioD han. 18 U.S.C. 207(aX2) imposes similar restrictions _on anExecutive Branch officer or employee who has a Oovemment contract or other particularmatteractually pending under his official respOnsibility during the oneyear period before thetenninadon of his Government service, which involved a specific party or parties at the time itwas so pending. These restrictions (18 U.S.C. 207(8)(2) last for two years after tennination ofthe employee's Oovemment service. "Officialresponsibitity" is defined as the directadministrative or operating authority, whether intennediateor final. and either exercisable aloneor with others, lind either personally ortbrough subordinates, co approve, disapprove, orotherwise direct Government action. Based upon the information you have provided. intendedemployment with adefense contractor may concern the same particular matter(s) which waspending under your official responsibility while serving as an officer in the Air Force.Accordingly, this two-yearrepreserttation ban may apply. Please be aware that the Departmentof the Air Force does not have authority to issue authoritative opinions on 18 U.S.C. 207, asthis is a federal criminal statute the interpretationof which falls under the jurisdiction of theDepartment of 1ustice.

    c. What is prohibited under the Itfetlmeor two-year represen1atlon ban. It should benoted that, if applicable. ISU.S.C. t 207 does not prohibit your employment by a defensec o n t ~ t o r ~ it only limiti communications or appearances with an intent to inRuence theGovernment that are made on behalf of the contractor. Thus, there are no restrictions on"behind-the-scencs' activitics--this means that you could still be employed by a rompany andwork on a contract to which the ban applies. but your communications to any Governmentogeney regarding the matter would be restricted. Finally, the prohibition does not apply to anappearance or communication involving purely social contacts. a request for publicly availabledocuments, or a request for purely factual information or the lupplying of such infonnation.

    d. Further I.formation. For additional information regarding the representation ban.including how it applies to Advisory and Assistance Services contractors, please refer to the"Rules on Job-MoodnS and Post Government Employment for Executive Branch Employees"handout. which you have ~ n preViously provided. The applicable statute 18 U.S.C. 1207. hasnot given the Department of the Air F6ree statutory authority to issue authoritative p i n i o n ~ . 4. Conclusion. It is my opinion that, With exception of seekingemployment w i t b ~ b ) ( 6 ) I

    )(6) 141 U.S.C. 423 does noc place restrictions on your employment options. The lifetimeand two-year representation bans may apply to your post-governmentempJoyment, if it is theSame particular matter(a) in which you participatedpersonally and substantially (or was withinyour scope of your officiar responsibility) while employed by the government. As mentionedpreviously. however, the Depart111,ent of the Air Forge does not have authotity to issueauthoritative opinions on 18 U.S.C. 207. as this is a federal criminal-- statute the interpretation ofwhich falls under the jurisdiction of the Department of Justice. For further information or

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000082

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    23/60

    llssistance regatding this matter, please contaci MajorK,---,b)'-'-.(6....

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    24/60

    Conduct Resulting ID the One-Year Compens8Uon Ban(The "Sellen Plus Seven Rule")The 41 U.S.C. 423(d) oue--year compensation ban win apply to an

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    25/60

    . . . . .,"J:' .p ''28 Aprl12U08

    a,$.c.fJA.)S:&miltoItStreet'HAn'Com,APB,MA 01731.aOl0

    D e 8 t ~ _ b ) _ ( 6 _ ) _

    Z. 18 :U:-Slc..:('201(a)U) :provi(JCs that ,.n x ~ c u t i ' v e Branch ftcer 0f,empJoeo. who has,Jn hisoffi'iial ( t p ~ l t Y t pattiefpated.p:etsOllliJlY anlf soostantlllUy'il1 i,.tiarticulltmatter, i.ncludlfig a '.OEl'iernmtnt.corttraC,\ whichhivol"eda specifi

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    26/60

    4. Shouli;l,another'mattGr' a r i ~ , oowever., dUritl8iycJ01' e ~ W Q v m c n t withkb)(6), , Ithatwould r n p l ~ the lifelihue ' ~ p r e s e f t t ~ , ( r . o r e 1 t b p l e . l b ) ( 6 ) lw.ere te PUrchUB'$ClOrttmctor"wnca held a o n t t a ~ ' W i t h ~ n an ) f f i ~ you w ~ r e Wi'th"whUe., yOU, w e t e h e ~ : : ( i . ~ . , ~ b ) ( 6) l o t ~ b)(6) Ithe fbUn'Wing gu.id,eJin"., Ii,i."CprtWlded t Q : ' ~ s & i 8 t ' y o u in ~ o n r p J yitlt wi ~

    t h c t e p m . t a t i 9 n , : l ? a n ; s h ~ ~ n . P l ' 1 y . ! ..

    ' fj;obit!ttsI, YllIQI'.s', You Q1UY nlit aUe.n4 a:ny I t ; l ~ i ~ g : o f . Q o n ~ , g ~ t ~ 1 ; \ d . O Q , v e m m ~ t 1 t ~ r s o n n e l W : h e r e t " e ' s l i / 1 j e Q t Qf m ~ t 1 n g c o n e e t J t j r i g ' t h e , c o r t t r . a e t o r seeking a,mscM:iefi,ary ,

    O Q v , ~ r n m e r t t , t i l l h i a . bemefit" appi'trWI,.,Ot. o t l \ e r ; l l e t h j ~ ~ : o r ' w h e t e ; t ~ : m e e t i n g in connectionwith"a,matter' which yOu knoW' irt\lorves an a p p r e c i f 1 b l e ~ f e m e n t : o f diapute c o . n C ' ~ m h t g p a r . t i ~ i a t (Jovfimment ~ e t h ) n t( ) be:Wmn ( i , ~ " hto.ormaotiPn w t ~ ~ a t t , r : ~ t t t u l , t ' . ~ a d v e [ $ , ~ l i l l l in, natU;te). Howe,ver, .you l!t:e noi prohibited trent l\ppe.ari,ng at a ~ ~ $ l t i o n " t r l , ..l Qr heartl)gin, l : m n ~ t i o n wfth the c o n ~ ~ t j ' i f - ) ' O u : wi'll be, Iiving-teSthl)ony under oath or makil'l'gst,tementfil'teqllt"dto, made underpenaIlyo.f:petjury..

    1II . PrQhibtWd 'communtoation:&... Y()/;f..rtUly.not c O l ' l l i l i i . U 1 i ~ a t e wt'th OOvetnm,ml'empJoyees.pmsenUhe contraetor's,'posltiOn, ot.aet.as , t b e t o n t t ' a c t o i 8 ' f i e g ( j t i a t D r ~ ,sptlkesperaon (I trepresentative-lnc0nnection wifhaJi.Y cotnmtlliieatton made fQr'the p u r p . o ~ of e . k i n g a diseretionttty Oo

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    27/60

    'under t ~ j ' u r l s d i ' C t i O J t , l ) ' h h e o.partl\\ertt o.f JU$til1e. Accotdih.Sfy\ 'thi$ apinibtl em the p ~ l 1 c . a i i o t / of1'rt.aboU.t ttri.$ Q p i r r i ~ t i . Sincerely

    1 t ' t a l l I n e r ( t : , J i l e q ~ ~ $ t : f o r - l g u : S . C . '207 o p i A i o n ~ datedl_bXll_'__ -.JIwlResume

    . , , ' ,

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000087

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    28/60

    SijIDD18(Y'QfMaterlals:PtiV$.l-y Act S t a t e m ~ n t (Pal)& , l 8 n a t i . o ~ of18 USC 207 (pi.I)Fonnat fQX'.a r e q u e s ~ f o r ~ 18l)SC 267 opinion. (pg.$)

    W ( ) r k s h e ~ l for each partio.ularmatter

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    29/60

    (5) You then) at :any time bt 'YoUr lite; COttim.unicate w.ith .Q.r:1JP.pwbefot:e. a'govenarrten.tofficer or e t i i : p l ~ incOiUWc.tion.with the same ~ ) h t r . i l ~ t ' o t ( ) t b e r ~ . thl't yauparticipated tnwhlle'.)Jou w e r e : w i f : l l ' t h ~ - & . . d ~ , 8 o v e n u n . n ~ ; (6) Your otmim111Ucltion o.r p p ; e t l I : f i . l A A l l $ ' Q n . ~ h a l f - o f ' s o r n o o n e ' o ~ h e d h a n t.he Unite([States (s.l:fd1 as ~ e oontrA.CltOr) O d $ Q J ' l Q t e 1 h O ' ~ f ) o r t y QI). '\'hos:bebatfyou are;maldng,the

    ~ p p e . D 1 ' \ U l e . ' t ' Q r c Q . ~ ~ i c ! ' t i o n ; : d o ~ a : . n . 9 f h . a . v e t o b e ' t h e . s a m e . p a r t y who was. ifiVoIwd. -in matte,l'. tbe.:thn.exou w ~ r o ' W Q r k i ~ ' : , o n : t h e m ~ t t e r fur the'government);

    (1) Yo-udnteJ:l,t in a l Q n ~ , ~ , ! c . Q J l U U u ~ i ~ ~ b n , o r . appearance.!; to iilflueaCl'6 the8 o , , ~ t p f f i ~ b d ( i ~ ~ y o U \ i : e ' n D t justpraviding.J:liformationj youfro.,tryirtgtopersuad'.the g o v ~ r n m e l l t Q : t ' f u i i a l : . a b o u t s l ) m ~ t h i n J ) ~ and

    . (&J. You ~ o w , when yoij ate o o . m . t n : u n i ~ n g . w i t i u i t ..appeatiilg'btd'Qri the govermnentofti1U!J. tltaHhe mattedn t}l)estion isi matter 1:l18t you.partioipated'inwhenyoti:werewith the g a v e r m n c n t - ( t e . i t ~ s not something sojnioor"th'atyo.u.forgotyo;p evet wOfke4on'ifwhen you were Wilh the g ~ v e m m . e n t ) .

    3;, The 1 ' 2 ~ y e a r : r e p r e ~ e n t a t i o n b a n l l be,tum.ItiQrlRd.as:rou()W&. You will vi.j,jl.te thls.14wUaU ) f ~ . f o l l ~ n g , e ' i g h t cond.ldons:occurl. (1.) You:ate-a ftlil.itat)fo.t'flcer, ' J " a . c N m ~ e n 1 p l o . y e e . ~ n ~ e ~ t i v , \ 1 B r a n c ! t , (2} Whih,- rO\l".m'working fQdhe.govemm. b e . ~ e Js a:gav.emment Cohtract. oroth:er~ e ~ r n a t t e . r J r r W h ~ d h t h e U ~ j t e ! f ~ ~ t e s " h ~ a directMd sUbstantial 'illeiest, that

    p ' e ! l . d i ~ l l l l i t t l e t y o J i r ' ; u f l i ~ " ' . r : e s p ~ I J , ' l i & D i ~ d l l d n l : y ~ r lastyear ,I.- 'th"llOVenlinen.l;:~ 3 ' i At the time the ~ t : : i 5 ] ~ e h d ~ , u n d e r } ' q u t o i j 1 $ i ~ l ( e s p 0 . n : ~ j 1 . ' ) ~ i t y . ~ u r i n g youtlfist')'Mi..in the gov.enun.ent.thends 8I\tb&r p l l l 1 y . ( s ~ ~ h . . : Q , : g ~ e . n t ' ~ o l 1 t r $ r t O r ) ; inVaJved IiI

    ' t h e : . m a ~ r ; '..(4.), You leave.tbe e d " l ' - t d , ~ p , v ~ ~ e n , t . (') During.thefi,r.&t 2 e a . r s a f W r y o u l e a v e . t h e g o V e r m t i e ~ you:oottUnUDicate:wtth a p p ! i i ~ before a government 'omecr at-employee htcotuleQtro.n with. 'that -same c;ontfaoto r o t h ~ matter;

    (6) Younmtrun\iidcation e r ' ; l l p ~ C e , is on,beha1f:of ~ ~ m , e ( J J . 1 l \ ' other tban :1Ilel)nitedStates::(such:a.s the eofttt'ilCtt,ll")- ( ~ d t b e p a r t y on w h o S J " b ~ f Y o ~ a:r.emaking't'heappelU'tU1ce , b r ' ~ m m u n i c a t i o n Q ~ . ~ Q . f P a v . e t o : ' b e t h e ; ~ e p a r t y w h o WaSJnvolwtiinthe matter'.at the:dl'i\,,'theIJ!.a#e!r was p e D d U J g ~ e r - y o u r o f f i c i a h . p o n J i b i 1 i t y dUtwg

    Y - 0 ~ : I 8 S t yc.... i.n f4e ~ o v . ~ t ) ; (7) .,"Put. ~ . t . umtdng. h ~ ' O O m m W i i O a t i o l \ , o t 8ppearaitot.i$.,tt) irdJueeUte .govert'ln,lajtofficial.(i-.e ..:yoti:!te!tiOtJiMptovrdlrtg i i f o ~ ~ r Y Q . u : t e ~ i n g ~ per:$lUIdethe govermrteht.e.fflcliU .about S ( ) m e t h i i l ~ ) ; ~ 4 I A d

    :2

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000089

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    30/60

    (11) You know, when you are communi"catin-g with or ilppe.aringbe;fun;-the ~ 0 V e r n m e r t t , o f f ' w i a : l ~ that the matter i n . ' ~ e ~ t i . o n is s'.n1,atter that was .pe.l1ch)lg' U 1 1 . d e r y o ~ pffielalrespc:utsi1;,ility durfrtg:yoUi' ht'S:t'y:e.ar in h e : g o v ~ r n i n e n t (to,. i t ( ~ not something SO minorthat you f0tJot itwas y . e ~ u n d ~ r YOUJ.'oft1cial r \ ; l s p o , n ~ ~ b i l i t y during,)'O\\lf lastyeadn,thc

    g O ' \ ' . C $ i t l ~ n t ) .

    4; PoDniti0llJUlnQ, In&try0tions.a, PartiCipate. W h a t d ~ e 5 h m ~ a n to l ~ c j ; p a 1 e " . i n a. governmettNonttaet or:other

    p ~ : e ~ l ~ ~ ? 'I'hle. 14partic.ipate" means.to take,iBJi a c t i ~ throt.l.h a e e i $ ~ b ~ . l i p p . r o , v a ~ " d i s i l P p l ' O v a ~ r e c Q I 1 1 m ~ n d a t i ~ U - t the ~ e t i n g o.f:ad\licc, investigatiotJ, or.othe.r ;$uc,h .aotlof1. [1'&USC 7 ( i ) ' ( 4 ) J .

    b. lJr t i - matt.. "Pattieuhit,matcerJi-'means any i n v e s . t i g a t i o ~ appUCfitipl4 request fora.wIingor r n t i n a t f o l t ) . r U 1 e t n a i Q n $ , . ~ c 0 ~ ~ ~ 'c.o'rttm'Vel'Sf.i claim?'cbatse, ~ u s ~ t h m , t U ; I : Qfjud-ictal'Of other proceeding; [l8 USC,201(i)(3jJ

    o. Oft1cial _ i l s i h ~ i w . t h t . ~ l ~ o f f i d . i a J r e s ~ s i b i J i l y l t n ' ! e Q n s . t l t ~ dt,..t:adl'itihlstratJv". . p b d n g ' ; a u t h o t i t Y ~ 'Whether m t ~ n 1 1 ~ i a t e o r . , f i n m ~ a t 1 ~ e i t b e n ~ ~ r c i s a b l e ' 8 1 o n e otwith: t h . t r ~ . a n d tither,permna1.ly or " S h , : s u b o r : 9 i l - . ~ ~ t tfil p p r o v e : . ciisaPP.J;'Ove;. or-otherwise,direetOeyemmmt aqtioo.. n:a USC'202(b)] .d., . CQrntnW1iQrrtioD, A ~ ~ o m m . u n i c a t i o n " can be made-owly. in i i i h ) g ~ ot through

    " I ~ c t r o n i ~ transnii\$sion.e. A l m e a r a n ~ An ' ~ l \ p P e a n m . : c e J l would.inolude a , f o r i J i B r . u n p ' l o ) ' e i ! l ~ s , m $ ! e p h y t i i c l i l

    p J e B . @ ~ a t a.:meeting r p r o ( l . ~ q i n g ~ h e n the:circumtllanooa:makc:it'clear thathis .attendlnceis:itltended ( O \ ' i J ) t 1 . u c ~ the l.Jnit.t$ s.tes.,

    f. .Intem to influence. AJI,flintentto.:intluenc.e" may be' tbund.itth'et)ml'nUiiiation Of: a p p e ~ i s . ~ d . e : for the p'\U}'ose 9 f ~ k i : n g a.discretioltluy Govtmment rofjo:s,.Dene:fit; ~ Y a , l ,

    o r o t b e 1 a ~ o n , . .r ismarler'01 the pWipose &f..inttneiiGfn) Governxnent IK.!tion in 0 n n e c t i o n .wi,t,h. .ma,tte"wbl:ch itte f o . P m ~ employee ~ W S : : i i l v ( ) l v e s ~ 1 l b ~ e i a b . l j " . l i ' i e n t . Q f d i ' . J ' , l ) t e . ' ~ o n e . t i ' r n ' i l l .thepartico1Bt Ooverriineoftae.tio.nto. bnabn. ACGQl'dirtsJ,; i b ; e : p ~ h i b i U ~ n ~ ( i o e s nJJt,applx to anE\ppeMance or'cormttunitation irtvQ1""llJl.l'Q$lY'sOOa.! c : o . n ~ t a ) r,qu.estfor'pu.blicly. availabled o t u n 1 6 W s ~ C l ' a:&equest tor ~ l ) ' f ~ t t . a l intotnmt!bn Q I I t b e . $ U P P ' ~ Y i h g i o f . s 1 ! M i ' I : t b r r i t a t i o h . 5. T ( ) ; ( ) b ~ h ~ q p i n i Q ~ on wbethedlle " l i f e t i q J . ~ ' ~ s l . n t t a t i o r t hani ' o r t h ~ t/2..ye8l'

    r " p r t t s ~ n ~ t j O n b a n l l 1*p,ply 'toyquwitb. 1'eSp'ect tq.a.pdeU1Ai'conttaetor, yOU m : ' U $ t ~ ~ 1 W r i ~ ~ r e q ~ ~ & t f O r ' ~ U ~ ~ Qpinion. u ~ . t;ho'fbnnat-which i ! attaohed .to,mll} tumddUl" 'YOUf'reqpe$lwill m.ean a t t . ~ h m . ~ n t toth.e" l ~ g a : L o.pinion you reeei\le.6, The legal opinion"will be valid onlylfyouprovide. complete andaecuratlt a c t s ~ Therefore,take,cQe when setting forth the faets,ill your .request.. H o ~ m u o h d e ~ i I to p u t : ~ n t o -a request fbi" alegal Opinion is always ajudgtnenteatt. If YOU'l.'O not s ~ ; , p l ~ e Qllly.0Uf ethicsattorney' tor'guldatJCt. Also. i fyou Gan, ' P t e l . \ S e : m ~ p a r c : y . O W " ~ ! 1 e s t 9 t 1 . - t l w o r d p r o . c e s s o ~ , ..as you riUly. be asked

    j

    l"

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000090

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    31/60

    to'prov.ide addhiona1UCts ~ r - . y o u r . . r e q u e s t is reviC\Wd. tbi$ is l X i t a U S ~ ) ' o U l ' ~ i Q s a t t o J ; l 1 ~ c s n o n l Y ' : J s ~ u e you lit .legal opinlli'lrt i r . Y . O Q t ' ~ 8 t OOQtaiiJ$ ,all the facts: n ~ e $ S a r y t n ' $ U p p o ~ th!o' leg!d,ct'Ult::b:tSion. .

    When draf\:ing y ( l u t r e q u e ~ t j YOU sbollld { . l ) ~ t a . t ~ what aCfC>n)m.lS $ ~ d . f o r ; and (2):assumet h a t . t h ~ r e v i ~ w i n g : a \ 1 O m e y s . . h a v . e n o ' t ~ d n 1 i : G ~ l ~ ~ Q . u n d , an!! Httte"orno: knowledge-cf:what youroffice (or fonner()fli,c,tV"dQ'es.8:. Th, ~ i f 0 p i n i o l 1 y o u .. r _ i y . ~ Qn ~ ~ "lifetime representation banfl,and:dle. 1 I ~ . y . e a . r ,'rep,esentaUQn 'ban" Will contain adiSQlaimer. The diselaimer wilt. sayth'atthe opibhm.:is thatof.the

    ' ~ p a r t r n ~ ; n t pf$e Air For.ce,and .thatthe opinion is not btridingon the,De'piWtlent ofJustice.FedefsLgovermntm-tattorneys Who do no.t w.()tk:f

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    32/60

    '[D.ate}'MEMORANDuM: FOR ESCfJAA

    F R O M ~ Name, C ~ 1 rank or grade8treet;addtes$City, S.tate, Zip' 5 t J B I E c r ~ Request fQr 18 tJ ..$;0; ::207 Q p [ l l i , o ~ . 1. J-requ'$1: 'a.legal < ~ p i n i o n on .the a . p 9 l i ~ 1 t o n ofl.S , ~ ; c , 2ff1 tb my"einplOyrnel1t 'With (AtUne

    : o f Q Q i : n p a r i y . l ~ l' [ ~ p e e t PWGuld UkQ.] t ~ ' ~ i n ' w o r l d n g : f o t this camp_y. ron (date ot'approxi1lUiti ; l " t ~ ) J r.'soon,tlS O ! l ~ ~ l c ]i' .2\ .Background, [Tn this pai'agmph. prov.lde. gcneralin:tCun1edtlll .abo.uf ,our last $' yellts: ii). tilt!Air Fqree. In.elude:

    a. The installation(s) wbette you were assigned.b. Th ' office(s). you were a s s i g ~ e d to, Md. Jhe, office mnbol '()f , o f f i ' C ~ (or those

    o f f i c e ~ . . .Your job titl:e!(s) (and :the dliJtes )'Qu b ~ l d e ~ l l p o s i t i o ~ . ,if youhetd more than dnepositioJl) ..A brief desE:x!,pUOIl Qfyour JoP duties (in each p o s i t i ~ i f you held 'more than oneposition). (oo'ma)' d ' $ c r i J ) ~ Whattheresponsibiuties:of)!Ol1t otlicewere, but pleaseW$O d e s c r i b e < ' w h Q f J ~ m u : r . l ' - s ~ i b f l i t i e s w e l l : ; J

    W h . t O I \ ~ ~ . ( ( ) l , ( $ ) . 1 Q . Q , : - . w Q t k e d : w l t h (if ~ ) ~ f. Y o u r ~ t e of e t i r e n : i e J i t ~ s ~ p ' a r . a t i O h , o r ~ ~ t t t i ~ n fk>ttl' AiJ ; P o r e e , ( Q r t 1 l ~ e ~ i ~ da1e)j' and.the date. yotfw.m ''be$iil' ~ j ) r the ~ 1 e ; y ( ) u b e g ~ ) t ~ 1 ~ (if YO.u. wiIltake.. a m t a k i ~ & ( ) r t o . o k 1 < l n n i n a : l l e a v ~ : l . . . .

    ,g. tt.tnUitaty,. attached 1$ a copy of-my Offl

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    33/60

    4. mvolvtmenl in MtUl'iI .MaueIl ' ~ h i l e DUloYN hY the'. oaveJM1ent; U.eftherp8ll8graph .(,A:) "'No1NVoLWMENT' (if:cach ofthe. ~ t , a t e t n e r t t $ undetA ~ : e o . r r e ~ ~ ~ i h regard,toyour potential : M i p 1 6 ~ e r ) . ()t hnigr*h. (D), "SOME. lNVOLVEMl!N.T" (i f YPu..'or ':someone whQ'works fQr y()U 'has had seme iirtvOlvtn1e)tt hi .ilJ)f , p ~ ~ J 1 1 a r : m a ~ , - , i n w . l y . i ~ & 'Y9- , p o t : ~ ~ a " e m p l o y . e r ~ AND A L . S O ~ fitl out ,Peagrapfl ifyou plM, to wQrk fM a u p p c n t ~ c o . n _ t o t p r o v . i d i n g S U ~ } \ W i t " . s . c r v . i c e s : b a C k to the Oovenunent

    4A. NO' I N V O L : \ l E . M ' E N ~ IN MV CONTRACT: OR OT}IIl;R' PARTICULARMA.TTER; "(At1;:Ie.h WG.rksheet, [ I o c a f ~ I t : e ~ 4 ofthisdocumentl, for examples01 n ' Q m m l i f ~ ) [IfyoU're slirt .all the followip,g five statements are true o r y ( ) u ~ then exll1Y 'each paragtaph and USe

    t h ~ . _ your paragraph 4" ]' \ . ~ While-,(unployed'by ~ Y e . : n u n e n 4 . : I d 1 d nothave any.;j:nvoivement:ioJ,or wQtkoo:in anyWIJY, .any' Q o n t r . a e ~ ' b a s i ~ .ordelrlng tlgreernent,blarikot plitehase: ~ t d e r l $I1\; order?' ' d ~ n ' Y e w

    ' Q f d ~ . grant. P t o . , p c s a ~ 'QJ. ~ t h e r :.pdeular matter that was ltwatded to [c'Ompany"for w h i ~ h y . ~ \ 1 ! ~ r e ~ s t i n g 1be opinion], .~ l - ~ W h i l e e m p l o y e d by. the O o . v e m . r t t e n t ~ , I d i d ~ ( ) t ; ~ " . $'1y ittto.Jv.ementifi.. pr'WQtk'9n iJ(l way, any. sOUrce s.ele.ction. eo.ntnlct .tonnattw 'pto*s,fi:n:n.w.'tipn p r Q ~ s : tbrlUlY basic.

    : o ~ e r i n g a p e e m d r i t ~ . bianke.t, ?\1tQhutr 0 !lsk : o t d e r . d . t I i v ~ l 1 . o n i . ~ pUl t.. propos!il, 'Oil Q t h e r ' p a r t i ~ t i J a r ' m a t t e r whiehubas botbe.ep. a w a t d ~ a ~ t b n t 1 J ~ l \ t y e t . fUI4"for which [oompinyfot Which you'reMlue.s.tmglb. o p i r i i . Q ~ l :is. ~ t e s . d o r ' i n v ~ l v e d .

    .. While employed by t h e O o v - e n u n ~ t l . l d i d . n . c r t ~ ~ any i n v ~ l ~ " l i d f , 1 ..()r;"woik c;Jn: itt1llYWAy, any contraetlfteqws"itfo.n feJ'JlUitiQn P ~ ~ S $ . or,s. 'formation pro"s for'any basic ()Wletr.'rtg

    ~ p e m e n t ! bldDk.et 'p11rh8$e o . r . d e r ~ task order. ~ t i v e Q ' q r Q t ; " ' 1 .. g r ~ t ..propOsal; .or other'parti"cular miltter::. w'ht1ther a:w$td., '()r' i n a l i z ~ ( l . 'or nQt;on.whioh:,thetlom;panytbt. whIl)ld amset&ing employment will assign m ~ .W- wQrk..(sueh as ap.rim.e-co.ntt'aet, with another companywith which my pentiw.empJoyet has'8 1 i b G O n t r a e t ~ o r suO!t'a:s a r i m e , c ( ) I 1 ~ with ~ h e r C()rttra9tpr tm ,W(hteh tny : p ~ ~ c n l t l a 1 e J n P ~ y . c r provides support serviets to the' Air- Force).

    ( N O T ~ ' : If yD,l,J become aware of othe.r pmtlculat tititters later, you :may' req\l4!$.t a':Illpplemente1 . p l n h ) ~ : ) . ..i ~ W h i l e 'CJlWIQyed t))" the G o ~ e n u n e i J t , I did Mt.. p . k t i : Q i p a t ~ in., or WQrk:. ~ 1 l , itl W,y, ~ y in.vestijation,. applicationj teques.t .fur :a .rUllng 'or 6 ~ ~ i t 1 ~ : o n ; t'U t n I k i ~ ~ gtraet,:cortftover'syt. ' e l a ' f i i i ~ clmtge, : t i C C U $ a t i ~ ~ S ! j " 4 ~ j J 1 o.r ~ t h e r p r o ~ d j t . l g " o r aftY other

    . i U t f . ' t e r i n \ 7 o l ~ i l 1 : ~ [ t l 1 c t ( 9 b f i t ~ r . for .wMeh;y.ou'n:r r . e q ' q ~ $ t i ~ tblr! "QpinionJ. {Note to jWSonptiepa:rittg:tb1s lette.t:P>Qr $(iUnpktror J $ r t i ~ a : t i Q : l ) , " ~ ~ . ~ ~ e d wo.rksheet;,)' ~ ~ I N . t i t 1 g ...the last y e ~ (i fmy v e r . m n ~ " t : service. noithet:.t. not M'Yon.e. 'who w.oikl\!d: fi.u' meit,1 my d i t l ~ . ~ b i of supemsion,hadi, or w i i l . h a v i ! ! ~ the 'iltteet adlilfu'l:strative: ()r: ~ t a t i n g '

    a u t h Q d ' o / ~ w h ~ t h c , r i j ~ e r i n e d i a t e Or'finat. i n d ; l r i : t h e r ~ e t c i 8 B : b l l l i / t d d D e fir ~ t h . e ~ IUtd,e-itber. p e r ~ ~ t ~ y orthrougllsubotd'itt=,to ~ , : ( f i S a p p t O Y . . i , ( ) r . o t b e r W J . ~ d di'reet G o v e . m t n ~ t a.etiOnOD. anyoontlaet or :paltiCtiiar IiiWt (wheltler' ~ r , n ( t t t h . ~ . atd.horiV w a s " a : e ~ l y e*ereiled), involving {the t O ~ p ' a n ~ fur which y , o ~ ' ~ : r e q ~ t i l J g , an o p i 1 V ~ - U ] . (NOt4:'to ,pel.SQI\

    6

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000093

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    34/60

    preparing thisle1tert For..examples of what :i8 npendihg u n d ~ r " ) ' t w t o f t 1 d a 1 ' r e $ p o n s i b t 1 i t y . / seethe attached.workSheet)."[If 'you1re atUl employed by .the Air FQt'ee;atld if the (01l0Wblg s ~ t e m e n t is: t@e for YO.U.i thenh..chide it in ,your paralltaph 4.]

    "':1 Will not pal1icipat;

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    35/60

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    36/60

    'trade orlteaty'M,g9ligtion's. [If.'y,ouft.e'$1ll'ethefolloWing staternent is title for-you, then use itas y o u r / p ~ h ;. There are two vetsidhs of,the statement. The t i t ~ t 1s for peopl, who have left.the Air Force. The seootld is'forpeople who ate in ,their, yearin.thaAir Force.]";,,-During my last year,in the Ait Force.I did 'not.partieipate m,or work on in attY"WIly', 'anyongoing trade-or'treaty negoti.tiojts on ~ h a J t o . f t h e Urti!d Stateswhkh involved [ l ; Q t n . . P ~ Y (otwhich o u ' r e ' ~ " " e s t i n s opbiton],

    ~ . " D u t i t r & : m y 'Inst year in the'Air ,Foree; I b a ~ ~ not p a r t i ( i i p a t e 4 j l l t q ~ , ' \ V O r ~ d j)D, 'in,any way,a n . y o t l 4 o i t l ~ t m d ~ or .ty ~ g o t i a t i ( m s on ~ ~ . p i th,e. JJnited ' S t A ~ e s w h i ~ h inVOlve[company ro,r Whicb y o u . ' l l ! l r e q u e $ i i n g ' : t h e : o p i n i ~ n l . '.14.9 n . Q t : e ~ p e c H o ' p ~ i p a t e in,or-\wrk.on anrsuch negoii.rIOD$ b ~ ~ e ~ I 'leave 'the Air'Foroe.

    rtf-this ~ t e m e n t . $' (lof'tlUt ~ : Y O Q . qr j f y o u ~ r e ' " n ( ) t sure if1t's..f:r\t!l"!PrYQu",provide the 4etai,ls ~ o u t t b e . ' t t a ~ orkeaty ~ g o t i a J i , ( J ~ , ) ' Q u are or'were involve4with.]6. [Please ,mail the opinion t(> t n e " f o l 1 o w i n g , a d ~ s ; ...]

    L P r . e ; f a ~ the opinion to . ( x x ~ ) : ' D ' X ~ x x , x : x . a n d ~ J it to the f'otlowtnS'adfuess: ...1[ } ? l e a s ~ cal1 me:wlren ,tho 'opinion ,is,ready; as 'I would like to pick'it:up,.]Ifj'oJ,l have : ~ y " q 1 J e s ( i ' Q t l $ t please call 'me, at ( x ~ x ) , xxx-xxxx (busine$$) or (xx,x) ,xxX"XXXXQlomo)..

    ['Yournatne][ ~ ( } u r tank. or ,grade]tCun-ent fotm.l't Q 6 . i ~ e ..SyniboIJ '

    (See Works.heet otr:next ~ , e )

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000096

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    37/60

    jYw!([email protected],toJ,S 1 J S C " 3 t t ~ . ' rel ; : ' I \ ~ "'"sJt,au_a...AU.ftd_leti seSUURL)1) ldentify the f Q l l a w i ' i \ ' g : i b . t h t t n a t i ~ : . ~ - e o n ~ t n a m _ :

    - - C o n . t N c H ( ) . t o t l t ~ t p l U ' i i u l ~ r n ~ ~ t ) . n ~ n t * i . -.-_-:--......... _..-Task ~ r d e h ' v ~ otdM J:tQtri.:berName of:oontraetor .~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - -..Name ~ phone'No; o f . c ~ n t t a e t i n g : o f t ' i t : e t ' t l m o w l e d 8 C J l b l e pC1'5oIi) _ - -__. ~ N a m . e and phone .No. '9f r o g r ~ m ~ i j a g e r Please list your home addressfortheadQress. eJeme.nt in.ou.r l ~ t t e r t o you (even. ft'you are

    r e q u ~ a i i 1 i g : a : f a x .opy).

    " !". ~ L e $ : i : (Nnt:anaIH.nc!u5ive n $ N J f ~ x a m p l . e ~ ) . A. Dld ..o/OO. identify, d e s o d b ~ ; d l : a i j , ' r e v i ~ ~ a.ppro.ve. g i v ~ ? : a d v i ' C e l , : o n , o r Itlak'et.eepntmendauo.J1s regarding'tb.:e t d q ~ ~ ~ t , l t $ o f the ~ Q f l ~ : ' m o d i f i ~ t t t i O n , t'a$k or

    d e l i " f . e r y , , ( ) t d e r ~ underLytng:baeie \ : ) r d e . d n g ~ C J i l t . ' 1 1 1 ~ ~ t ; p u r c h a s e " f l g r i : e J h e l i t otolhorparticular rnQr? (yes/no/not'sQre.) ( I f ' ~ y e s ~ ' Q r " ~ n o t $ ~ J " s:JCMibe.'fuUy Y ; Q W ' r 4 I e ~ amJt h ~ r d a t e Q y . , g e r r o r i n e d s.uch a g ~ . l .

    , .a.Oid':yo'U f ~ e n i j ' f Y , . Uesc.ribe. dFB,f't;,:t'eviow.,approw" aivc'ad.YlGe,cmf.'6i Meke

    . r e ~ o m m e n d a ~ i Q J i 1 . B r ~ g ~ r d j : n g 4tly,att :o:f'tne teCilie;t for pt19j;Jo*1 tor. C'Ont'(.llCt,mQdfflcati()l1;:taskof delivery ,order',. urtdUl1'it\'g.bi:sfodrdefloa a a J . ' e ~ f l 1 e n t i . ~ ~ d t . purchase agteemont... ihci1udlng, bUtJ'k I h n i t l : d f Q , l ' E ! e a . ~ t t 1 n d : i n g r n e l J J $ i Q l 1 ; ( ) f : ~ Y Contract' . t a : ~ ~ l t . , m . e n f S LJs.t(CDaL), Pat. ~ :I;JewQliptjt)%l' (D:l,I),), S t a . ~ , l ) t of'Work (St):W) p , o v i s t ~ n , e . . Q n ~ . : c j a \ U l e , ~ ~ a i o t p : ~ r r . Q . J m a n ~ e . . r " b , Y ~ 1 e v i e w i n g :tnstructions tor submitti.1lS; G . ~ ~ t n m e ~ : Q r C o l \ ~ t . ( ) r ; p r o ; p ~ s e d test plans? ( ~ e s t n o t h ( j t sur:e) ( J f y ~ s ; ; "not $.l.tt'e:/,,MpJ'befuDN,ypm:; rol.e, andthe ..:d4te, f ' ~ w t a e _ . ) ,

    'C. ' D i ~ f ) ! o u h a v e . ~ y .roic:f(u:tnwattns, e " l e m n g . : . P F o V i n 8 ~ m a 1 d ~ 8 l ' e ~ p . J l u n e J l d . ! J ; ~ i Q 1 ) $ ~ 'or givirtg 'advlee,:On Acqulsition;$.ttatt:gy t f d ~ t i . Q n o f ; e : ( ) r i i r ~ t . t;o i n ~ J i ! I . i ; l e j . ; d e J : ' l t ~ . I f . i t e r e ! l t e d . c o f t t r . t 1 e t o r ~ . :G.dtnpeti.tit1D.requite!nents. $Ole S Q u . r c . ~ : r e . o o 1 T ; l , m . ~ d a t i o D S : o r

    10

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000097

    mailto:jYw!([email protected],tomailto:jYw!([email protected],to
  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    38/60

    justifications. performing a truutret.alJneYl r e c : o t ' l 1 m e n d i n g o t " P ~ n n h " g : . a pre-awardllUdit,.adveni:slng t h ~ J . ' ! r o p o s a l t particijlating in the Acquisition S,trategy'Panel,invostlgating or identifyingsoUItes, oroiscussing the propos.allC01rtract with po.te.ntialofferors? {(sOt de.scribe )'our actionswith ragard t9 r o l ~ .. (ye.s/lltlInQt. sure) ( I f ' Y ~ s " or Unot ~ ~ / ' Q,escdbe fUllyvour mIl. and the:dats ygu performed.such rQle.)

    D, Did you haveanyrole i n ~ c e r t i r y i n g . fuDds, deciding.oo tun:d$J :approv,iltgtUnds,reviewing funds,.delemrlning-pnerity offbnd$,: g i v i t i S . ; i t d v i o e o t . m ~ : .recommendations regarding funds on;for 1 I i i s c o n t r a c t ~ ( y ~ ! t i P / n o t s u r e } ( 1 r ~ ' y e s ~ Pi'"not.suret d ~ s c r i b e fully &our .role.:an.d thedate. youporteri\'l6d ..11&h,,& rolc.)( ' ...

    E. Did yo-u have arty role in the 'Oost ortethiiical e:val1Ul'tibll ofoffers or- selee.tionoffW1ittaator? (Yes/nO/hot sure). (If''yes'' tjr Milot sure," del$db fu1l.:Y::tttur roll;. and the4It;yc,tu performed such .a:ttde.) .

    F. :Did you haw -any other f(lle in contrtl:Qt fotma'ion? :(ye&,no/npt sure) (Ife,yes" Qf ~ R Q t s . q r ~ ; " delorlbe fully yQur,roJe. and the date you petfomiF!4 sllehamk.)

    . z .

    3.) ~ . a r d i n g thi$ con'traPtrQr o t b . ~ pa,rtfcuJar ..m:attet identified "po"ej, did you take any IIttiORtht.OJ1gh 4 . ~ ~ i ( ) n : ; appi'C1Y,al, d.isap,rovai, rC9mmendlni9fJ., the rendering 0: aclvtte,JitvcStigatlUil.othr a ; ~ ~ i o r t { t e l a t i n g to c O n t r ; l c r p c r f o . r m a n e e Q N ! ' d m i n i ~ t r a t l o n ? (YcsllJOfno.t sure)" (I' ~ y e s ' ) or ''not ! l ~ / ~ 4'eJCribe,fully Y Q l ! r r g l ~ ; . and the ,date you ..pertOtJn.. ,1.: uctrpito.ita..).'

    EXAMPLES: (Nbt 8Il:,all.:inclua{:vcllst'.,otc){amples)A.. Did you have any role t r m ~ decisions, :ap.pt9va!$,disa.ppJ

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    39/60

    '.c. bld,no a v e ; ~ Y " r t ) l e in "f,lpproving or disapprovi:ng. 4 v i ~ i n g " r . ~ ~ m e n d l n g acti"on..evtduating ot reJ()lvmg any Request's for E q u . i u l b l e A d j ~ e n t $ j ' costpropo5abl.d(sputes,or cl:alms7 (yesinolnot:$"UI.'e) (.If''"yesh or t",not sure/'desc.rib; fully Y2ur ictle, andtne8.you .Detfq,rmeq sUGh.atole;) ,O. D.id you: eyer b.,avc any role reeommending. 4Ssi-gnih8',. Or' generating taskings orwork e q ~ r e l J l e n . t s fur ~ o n t r a c t ( ' ) 1 ' personnelto perfutirl?: '(l.f"'yesU or llno.t.'lilutet s J I ! ~ fullY Y Q u r : r ~ J I ' J 1 f l p r d i n g e a c h s u c h t ~ k ~ . a n d t h e : . ~ : y p u . p e ~ suttl.,ugle.)

    .E.. W e , ~ y ~ u , . j n v . o I V l ! d itM;,lbsmg::otit'this oontJact1.(yesirt()fnot $-U,(e) '(lfJ'yei'.or ",It.at. ~ Q ~ ' " desetiw,:ftiiJYYQYt::r0);, ,find h e ' ~ , y O u _tot:t1iWsueha',l'0lc.J .

    4) rtegarding:this'Contract o r - : c . h e ~ ' l'artiC"PJar:_ e r dentified- a \ ' 0 v ~ ) . during yout 'last y.ear ofGovernment serli.e, wudhi'soontract (or o n m , . I " J ' a r t i o t l l ~ m . t t e ..)aotual1y peJUi-llig under your..00ttiUlal rlil$):iQrtsfhtlity? ,.. ; (YES/.NOINQT SVItE) o t ' ~ / ~ o r not'.sure:- @mlht:.t\tll\: lsmr ' t O l e ~ and the diitEryou Jllorf h.been miQAdtg 'PRQipa1t:i11.,! m a t t ' i : ~ t h m t h e : ; s ~ ~ . dtlifS:({\)"f;ies, 'rhusi t $ l i ' P t l r v i S Q r ; c a , r h a w ' Q : l l ; 1 c I ~ r ev.n h o U ~ h , l t j i S . ' $ \ . J b . c ; f d i n a t , l ; hl$e $ p o ~ b i H t y fur a ~ l t d i n g ; ; m . t t ~ t n9t retrleved:'the, assIgnedmatter ftom his i ~ b o ' - t , 6 r ' a i t h ( ) ~ 8 b ' h a v i h g : r e ~ e d l t i , : h ~ 'worked on it )

    I" , )

    .mtAMPtE$:: (Not 'an . a.U-inQIu$'ive H l $ t . 9 f ' ' e . x W P l ~ ) .A. 'ihKb)(6) ~ b ) ( 6 ) 1 ~ . w ( ) r 1 d n g .. m 1 . e n g i o e e r ~ w o i ' k e . d . {(jfthil.bss" clviiengimt.er wllQ"in f;urn' q r k ~ .forthe.. colntttm:tder- atKb)(6) Ith.workin,g,;]eve.!'e1,leer reYi4iwed.a,contractor's:p'ro.p.()sed test plan.for h Q . W ' : t o . t n ~ i i . l t u r ~ :Ute

    p e ~ t ) P 1 I a n c ~ 'ofanew-.navigat10ftaiilld being;fnllde' Wider: C b n t r ' a c t - " N ' { I ~ : . O O O l . ' I l J e w q r k i n g ~ ' l e v e l er\8,lnecr w.u'oS!{gned the taik of' writin.g 8 repQIt to t b ~ ' : C o n t r 8 e t i l l g Officer .thtlttecollltri'ended.app'l'Ova:1of the test plan, which i e . d i ~ , ae didno1 disc-ussitwith t h e ' b a s e ~ i \ \ ' i l engineer ot'the ba$e t o n u n a ~ d l P J r ; The:'working-Je:vel engineer. the

    12

    -_.._------_............_-_..._-

    CREW v. DOD MAY2013 RELEASE 000099

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    40/60

    base'civil engifteertftlld.tbebase commanderallr.etired,in J u ~ e 2 0 0 6 . T h c n v . o r . l d n 8 : - 1 ~ v e l engineercal:l go.1{) worktorthe:Cbtitmetorand Cll.tl. w o : r k ' ~ b e h i n d ' t h e lloeIJ,es;' on c . Q n ~ t No. 000l,btit has.fncutted a ; J i e . t t m e t e P f . ~ t f l t i o n b a n ~ d e r USC 2{)1(a}(1)frQmmaking certain c($tti!'nunlcati(jnsto any OffiCeNWelJiployee ofrbe A;irFQrcl:l{and:UleO:ovenitn:et1t)a1X:Ju t any p ~ : r t n f : C ( ) n t t a c t NQ. OOO.].,.sit)ce he p u r l i ~ i p a t e d p e r s o n a U ) ' a n d St1bsJantiaUyon .jhat c o n ~ ~ t t h ~ J ; a ~ e . c i v i ~ e J J 8 i l ) ~ W : llttd the b4.\SCo.ommande1\ who.tlven:aw the r e c o m m e n d a t i ~ n . f Q r ~ p r p \ t . a l i O r ~ ~ test l a n ~ both have:two,.;y.

    t e p r e . s . e l J ~ t . i o l t bans u n d ~ r 1.8 V$(} 207(a,}(2) n:te&$ured ftomtheir aCtUa1: date offetfr,ernenf. ~ o m : m ~ p g c . ~ r t a l n e o m r n u n i c a t i : 0 I l s to offi1ll.ers O t : e . m p l b ~ ~ s of the' AirP Q r c . e ' ( ~ d the ~ o v e . ~ e f l t ) ap9UJ' ~ y padof:Conuact, sinee:the,cOl1ltaet:WftS.pe.itd.mgun.(iertheir o f f i ~ i . a l respQJ.1SUjUity IrQ'll!. 'the time. it hit Mr. SMitl1$ i n ~ b o x , The a $ . ~ civil

    e n g i n e ~ ' , a n d t ~ b a $ ~ . ~ ~ ~ r bad the dkeOt'adtnirttstfdtivt Or optttating:authorlty,todirect d ~ v e r n r n c n t . . a e t f ( ) n ~ e v ~ n : t h o u g h t h e y d i t 1 n o t exerctsethe:lrauthoritY. "f'he base~ m m a n d . e t would ~ k e . l y have atwo"ycitrn:presentlltionban' an ev$')' '

  • 7/30/2019 Responsive Document -CREW: DOD: Regarding Ethics Opinions Database: 5/22/2013 - Pp61-120 Crew v DoD May

    41/60

    Stmtll'iy Plimel, investi,gatil'l& .or d ~ m i f y j n g s o ~ s , . or dtSeU'5sing'.the.proposa:llc()fttract'with potential.offeroi's? If so, describe yo.'urattiorttrwith regard to y.QUtr.ole. (yes/no/notsure) (If ' y e s n or "'n6t 'sure?, d$1sepbe fullYYllttt r o l l ~ a n d t h e , date'you p!;rfotmes1 such a~ ) . .

    C..Duril1g:YQUilast year ofOOYet1Une.nt ~ c e . ~ d a n y , o , n . e i!J"YQur direct chain ofsuptrvision have any role in the c.os't::or t ~ ( l b n i e i l evalwti.ongffen 01 'se]e(\'tion ofconttaetQT1 . ( Y E ! S l n o / n ( ) ~ : : s u r e ) ( 1 f ' ~ e . s " Qr "not suret,deseribefullY a u r - r Q l Q ~ S i 1 d .the.dat )'ou R m s m n ~ d su.h II role:) . ...D.', t > w i n g ' y o ~ l a s t . y ~ ot'O()"CI'nm.e.n:t ~ C e , was anyone' in yauiditetrt cha1-n .ofaupervisio.n assigne:d>fm,Y ,task regarding the e6'ilttacddentifiectabove'1 ' ( ~ S 1 i l O / t l O , t : s u r o ) (I{"yes" ' l r " n q t ~ ~ ~ " : . g e s e r m e f Y l l y : t h e ( 8 " _ and the Mteoftl!e ! ! & m i ~ ; j

    6) During yourlafltyear .of Gov.etturtetit Sep,lice, did any ~ Q b o . r d i ' n a . t ~ , ( l ! I . J l Y o n e who workedfQry.ouitl' your 'ohainof sup:ervi$ion).ha:verthe-authodty t9 ap'pwve, ' 9 i s a p p r Q v e ~ < > r o t h e ~ i s e d i r e c t O o v e m ~ n t . itct$pn. r ~ ' a t i n 8 m c ~ n ' t J ' M l . z m a n t l e orgminiStta.tion. Qfthe Cont