Research Questions - wrrc.arizona.edu · What is the role of Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) in...
Transcript of Research Questions - wrrc.arizona.edu · What is the role of Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) in...
Research Questions
What is the role of Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) in meeting Arizona’s renewable energy requirements?
Are solar water requirements a critical limiting factor?
How does potential water use for CSP fit in the grand scheme of Arizona water supply & demand
How much water would be needed to meet AZ’s RPS using CSP?
AZ’s renewable portfolio standard (RPS) calls for 15% of electricity coming from renewable sources by 2025
10.5% from non-distributed systems
4.5% from distributed systems (PV will play a large role)
Assumptions
Take Black & Veatch (2007) renewable electricity demand projections to meet non-distributed RPS requirements
Assume 100% of this demand is met using CSP trough technology with closed-loop cooling
Use water requirement assumptions from DOE report to Congress (928 gallons / MWh)
Total Renewable Demand to Reach 12,000 GWh by 2025
Black & Veatch Total Renewable Energy Demand Projections
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025
GWh
Meeting RPS would require <35,000 acre feet of water
Acre feet of water required to meet Arizona's RPS using only CSP trough technology
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025
AF o
f wat
er c
onsu
med
Placing potential CSP water use in context
How does it compare to agricultural water use?
How does it compare to statewide demands?
Water Use by Commercial Scale Farms
USDA uses different definitions of commercial farms
One is farms with >$250K in sales
I use a less restrictive cut-off of >$100K in sales
AZ commercial-scale farms (as I define them)
Had gross sales of >$100K
705 farms total from 2008 USDA Farm & Ranch Irrigation Survey
Accounted for 94% of agricultural water use:
>4.3 million Acre Feet (AF) of water applied in 2008
Smaller Scale Operations
Accounted for 6% of agricultural water use
Farming not their main source of income Farms in $50K – $99.9K range averaged
<$10K in net farm income Farms in $25K – $49.9 range averaged
<$4,750 in net farm income
So, how much water do commercial-scale irrigators apply?
Using my definition of commercial: 6,150 AF per farm per year
Using USDA >$250,000 in sales definition: 7,718 AF per farm per year
Potential Water Use from CSP in Commercial Farm Equivalents
Acre feet of water required to meet Arizona's RPS using CSP
-
6,150
12,300
18,450
24,600
30,750
36,900
2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023 2025
AF
of w
ater
con
sum
ed
1 farm equivalent by 2013
2 farm equivalents by 2017
5 farm equivalents by 2024
Potential Water Use from CSP Miniscule Compared to Agriculture
CSP potential use <35,000 by 2025
Agricultural use: >4,300,000 in 2008
Point is not to pick on agriculture
Quite the contrary
Few would argue that 4 or 5 farms (out of 705) impose an undue burden on state water resources
Just want to place numbers in perspective
How much is <35,000 AF in the context of AZ water use
According to 2006 Arizona Water Atlas, statewide demand was 6.86 million acre feet
How does 34,272 of water potentially used by CSP by 2025 compare to total demand?
CSP 2025 Solar water use would be 0.5% of current demand
Derived demand for water for CSP electricty production by 2025 as a share of water diverted, pumped from wells, or
received to meet demand in Arizona
99.50%0.5%
SolarAll Other
Potential 2025 CSP Water Use Compared to 2006 AZ Water Demands
Solar
Municipal
Industrial
Agricultural
Based on AZ Water Atlas water demand data
How much is ½ of 1%?
1 teaspoon = 0.4928% of a Liter
So, if Arizona’s current water use were represented by a 2 Liter bottle of water, CSP water use would only reach 2 teaspoons by 2025
Black & Veatch projected solar’sshare of Arizona’sRenewable energy would reach 65%By 2025
That translates into22,277 AF by 2025
The water use of 3-4 commercial farms
What is 65% of 0.5%?
If Arizona’s water use were represented by the calories in a Big Mac . . .
. . . solar’s water use assuming 65% of renewable electricity generation would be fewer calories than the lettuce in the Big Mac
22,277 AF by 2025
Q: How much water would you save in 2025 if nuclear energy supplied this amount of electricity?
A: <11,000 AF0.16%
(calories of about half of the lettuce on that Big Mac)
Water embodied in AZ net electricity exports <30,000 AF
Source: Pasqualetti & Kelly
Water embodied in AZ exports
Whest
Cotton
0
250,000
500,000
750,000
Electricity Whest & Cotton
Acre
Fee
t
Water embodied in AZ exports
Whest
Cotton
0
250,000
500,000
750,000
Electricity Whest & Cotton
Acre
Fee
t
Electricity exports are exports out of state, while agricultural exports are exports out of country
Water embodied in AZ exports
Wheat
Cotton
0
250,000
500,000
750,000
Electricity Whest & Cotton
Acre
Fee
t
Water embodied in electricity exports are 4% of water embodied in cotton and wheat exports
Land Use Issues (quickly)
Development applications are not the same as development
Critical to have realistic projections of future electricity demand and derived water and land demand
Oil rigs at Huntington Beach
Active leases for drilling oil & gas
There are not offshore platforms everywhere there are leases
Summing UpThese back of the envelope calculations picked the most water-using CSP technology Water use would be less assuming different
technologies Did not account for innovations over 15 years
Important to have realistic demand projections in context of overall supply & demand
Important to consider net water use of alternative energy sources
Summing UpEconomists usually favor use of market mechanisms and price signals to allocate scarce resources
Past experience has shown that command-and-control approaches focusing on technology standards are highly inefficient
Summing UpSolar energy will not be a burden
Arizona’s water resources in the foreseeable future
Although, as with any economic activity (e.g. electricity generation by any source), the local environmental effects need to be considered
Questions
George FrisvoldProfessor & Extension SpecialistDepartment of Agricultural & Resource EconomicsUniversity of [email protected](520) 621-6269