Research performance in undergraduates receiving face to face versus online library instruction: A...
-
Upload
carlie-bullinger -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of Research performance in undergraduates receiving face to face versus online library instruction: A...
![Page 1: Research performance in undergraduates receiving face to face versus online library instruction: A Citation Analysis Sarah Clark and Susan Chinburg Rogers.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/5516307155034694308b5fd6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Research performance in undergraduates receiving face to face versus online
library instruction: A Citation Analysis
Sarah Clark and Susan Chinburg
Rogers State University
Claremore, OK
Fourteenth Off-Campus Library Services Conference,
April 29, 2010
![Page 2: Research performance in undergraduates receiving face to face versus online library instruction: A Citation Analysis Sarah Clark and Susan Chinburg Rogers.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/5516307155034694308b5fd6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Academic Libraries & the rise of Online Education
![Page 3: Research performance in undergraduates receiving face to face versus online library instruction: A Citation Analysis Sarah Clark and Susan Chinburg Rogers.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/5516307155034694308b5fd6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Evolution of the Embedded Librarian: In the Literature Laying the groundwork Coining a phrase Case Studies of embedding Best Practices
![Page 4: Research performance in undergraduates receiving face to face versus online library instruction: A Citation Analysis Sarah Clark and Susan Chinburg Rogers.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/5516307155034694308b5fd6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Evolution of the Embedded Librarian: Rogers State University
![Page 5: Research performance in undergraduates receiving face to face versus online library instruction: A Citation Analysis Sarah Clark and Susan Chinburg Rogers.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/5516307155034694308b5fd6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Beyond the Launch: Quantitative Embedded Librarian Assessment
![Page 6: Research performance in undergraduates receiving face to face versus online library instruction: A Citation Analysis Sarah Clark and Susan Chinburg Rogers.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/5516307155034694308b5fd6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Citation Analysis in face-to-face instruction assessment Hovde Davis Robinson and Shlegl
![Page 7: Research performance in undergraduates receiving face to face versus online library instruction: A Citation Analysis Sarah Clark and Susan Chinburg Rogers.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/5516307155034694308b5fd6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Methodology Population Teaching methods
Face-to-face Online
Assignment requirements
Data analysis Citations vs.
Sources cited Citation
Categories
Citation Categories
A: Textbooks, scholarly/technical books, and dictionaries
B: Peer-reviewed journals, dissertations, and conference proceedings
C: Publications/websites from educational orgs.
D: Trade, technical, and industry publications/websites
E: Corporate websites, ads, and whitepapers
F: Non-scholarly, non industry specific publications (including general business publications, encyclopedias and websites not belonging to any other defined group)
G: Primary sources and Personal communications, blogs, and social networking sites
H: Government publications
![Page 8: Research performance in undergraduates receiving face to face versus online library instruction: A Citation Analysis Sarah Clark and Susan Chinburg Rogers.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/5516307155034694308b5fd6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Results: Per Citation
A B C D E F G H0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
Online %
F2F %
A: Textbooks and Scholarly Books
B: Peer reviewed Journals & conference proceedings
C: Publications & websites from educational orgs.
D: Trade, Technical, & Indus-try publications/websites
E: Corporate sites, ads, and whitepapers
F: Non-scholarly or general business publications/websites
G: Primary Sources
H: Government documents
![Page 9: Research performance in undergraduates receiving face to face versus online library instruction: A Citation Analysis Sarah Clark and Susan Chinburg Rogers.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/5516307155034694308b5fd6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Results: Per source
A B C D E F G H0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
Online %
F2F %
A: Textbooks and Scholarly Books
B: Peer reviewed Journals & conference proceedings
C: Publications & websites from educational orgs.
D: Trade, Technical, & Indus-try publications/websites
E: Corporate sites, ads, and whitepapers
F: Non-scholarly or general business publications/websites
G: Primary Sources
H: Government documents
![Page 10: Research performance in undergraduates receiving face to face versus online library instruction: A Citation Analysis Sarah Clark and Susan Chinburg Rogers.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/5516307155034694308b5fd6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Conclusions
No statistically significant differences in citation patterns
Citation behavior suggests embedded librarian program meets ACRL Standards
Methodology can be useful for assessing Face-to-Face vs. online instruction, and is easily implemented by faculty and librarians
![Page 11: Research performance in undergraduates receiving face to face versus online library instruction: A Citation Analysis Sarah Clark and Susan Chinburg Rogers.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/5516307155034694308b5fd6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Limitations and Special Considerations Small Sample Size, only two semesters Unique citation patterns in MIS course
(Current trade journals > peer-reviewed sources in business & technology)
Narrow Research Question Does NOT explore instruction quality, simply
whether students cite similar sources after receiving online vs. face-to-face library instruction
![Page 12: Research performance in undergraduates receiving face to face versus online library instruction: A Citation Analysis Sarah Clark and Susan Chinburg Rogers.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/5516307155034694308b5fd6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Further Study Expand Scope
Timespan Additional courses Additional Institutions
Expand Variables Currency of sources cited Average Bibliography size
![Page 13: Research performance in undergraduates receiving face to face versus online library instruction: A Citation Analysis Sarah Clark and Susan Chinburg Rogers.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081518/5516307155034694308b5fd6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Thank You!
Sarah Clark, MLISAccess Services and Distance Learning LibrarianRogers State UniversityClaremore, OK
[email protected]: @oklibrarian
Susan Chinburg, Ph.DAssistant ProfessorSchool of Business and TechnologyRogers State UniversityClaremore, OK