Requirements

Way Ahead24 August 2009

Joint Training RequirementJoint Training Requirement

Characteristics:– Identified by a COCOM, Evaluated by a Service Component,

Supported by a Service Headquarters, then Validated by the submitting COCOM

– Directed by Higher-level guidance:• Department of Defense Directive (DoDD) 1322.18 – Military Training• Guidance for Development of the Force (GDF)• Guidance for the Employment of the Force (GEF)• CJCS High Interest Training Issues (HITIs)• COCOM Theater Campaign & Training Plans• Joint Training Plan High Interest Training Requirements (HITRs)

– Requirements shall be framed in terms of Joint Mission Essential Tasks (JMETs) and should address documented readiness issues in the Defense Readiness Reporting System (DRRS)

– May address training from tactical to strategic

RR

COCOMCOCOM

ServiceServiceHQHQ

ServiceServiceCompComp

Definition: The intersection of a COCOM’s, Service Component’s, and a Service Headquarters’s training needs linked directly to authoritative higher-level guidance

• Requirement: Conduct integrated theater missile detection and defensive operations

• Submitters:• COCOM – USNORTHCOM (and others)• Service Component – ARSTRAT (and others)• Service HQ – USN (and others)

• Linkage to Higher Level Guidance:• GDF – Prevent Hostile States and Non-State Actors from Acquiring or Using WMD• CJCS HITI – Combating Weapons of Mass Destruction• USNORTHCOM HITR – NORAD Aerospace Control and Warning Operations• DRRS Readiness Shortfall – Conduct Ballistic Missile Defense Operations

• Applicable Mission Essential Task:• NORTHCOM

• SN 3.4.3.4 – Manage Global Integrated Missile Defense Capabilities• ST 6.1.7 – Conduct Ballistic Missile Defense Operations

• ARSTRAT• SN 3.4.3.4 – Manage Global Integrated Missile Defense Capabilities

• Navy• TA 3.2.7 – Conduct Air and Missile Defense Operations• OP 6.1 – Provide Operational Air, Space, and Missile Defense

• Level of War: Strategic, Operational, and Tactical

Example

Cut in T2$ prevents USN from

adequately training

TA 3.2.7

ImpactNORTHCOM

unable to execute ST 6.1.7

Front End Analysis

begins outside of JNTC

Business CaseBusiness Case

Front End Analysis

Supported COCOM

Supporting – JWFC Training Development

Community of Interest

COCOMs

Services

Agencies

Requirement

JNTC Process

Prioritization based on e.g. # stakeholders # tasks affected transition plan ROI

Solution Identification

Resourcing

Solution Development

Validation

Fully integrated?

Does it met requirement?

Training Development JNTC

Transition to Training Program

Feedback

R

COCOM

SHQSC

Accreditation and CertificationWay Ahead

24 August 2009

Improved Accreditation/Certification ProcessImproved Accreditation/Certification Process

• Accreditation now prescriptive in nature– Programs and tasks selected by the JWFC based on COCOM and COCOM

Component training needs– Accreditation schedule will largely focus on re-looks of accredited programs

• Adds new tasks that align with the most current training requirements/guidance

• TD decisions and activities based on rigorous front-end analysis of validated training requirements. – Accomplished outside of the JNTC requirements process

• Accreditation/Certification issues remain responsibility of programs– A/C issues not JWFC problems to solve

• Mitigation backlog resolved– Issues analyzed and returned with few exceptions

Accreditation ProcessAccreditation Process

Commander, JWFC approves prioritized

list of UJTs

JWFC selects programs & tasksfor Accreditation based

on prioritized UJTs

Shortfall Assessment to Program

RR

COCOMCOCOM

ServiceServiceHQHQ

ServiceServiceCompComp

RR

COCOMCOCOM

ServiceServiceHQHQ

ServiceServiceCompCompProgram Decides

Which A/C Issues to Pursue as Requirements

CJCS: HITIsCOCOMs: HITRs

(Front-end Analysis)

RR

COCOMCOCOM

ServiceServiceHQHQ

ServiceServiceCompComp

RR

COCOMCOCOM

ServiceServiceHQHQ

ServiceServiceCompComp

Execute Accreditation

Based on Elements of Joint Context

Example Tasks and Programs for Accreditation

Air/Missile Defense• ST 6.1.7 Conduct Ballistic Missile Defense Operations

- NORTHCOM• OP 6.5.4 Secure Air, Land, and Sea Lines of Communications (LOCs) in JOA

- BF, JRTC, BCTP, NTC, JMRC, USAREUR

IO/Cyber• OP 5.6.1 Integrate Operational Information Operations

- BF, MAGTF TC, FST, JTFEX, JRTC, NTC, JMRC

Joint Fires• OP 3.2.7 Synchronize Operational Firepower

- FST, JTFEX, AWF, BF, VF, GF-E, GF-W, RF-N, JRTC, BCTP, NTC, JMRC, USAREUR, MAGTF TC

CIED• TA 6.9/OP 6.2.2.1 Conduct Counter Improvised Explosive Device (IED) Operations

- BF, GF-E, GF-W, JRTC, BCTP, NTC, MSTP, JMRC

IW• OP 1.2.8 Conduct Joint Urban Operations

- GF-E, GF-W, RF-N, BCTP, USAREUR, JKCE

24

Emerald Warrior

15Solution Identified

(Not Resourced)

11

Open

5

Not in Mitigation

Not in Mitigation

Solution Identified

(Not Resourced)OthersOpen

Solution Implemented(Resourced)

767 *Total A/C issues

334Complete(Archived)

Issues Way AheadIssues Way Ahead

379 – Returned To Program* 54 - Retained

55 – Reviewed High Potential Issues

Benefits of Accreditation/CertificationBenefits of Accreditation/Certification

• Validates Joint Training based on elements of Joint Context– Supports COCOM/COCOM Component war fighting requirements

• PBR’s to address A/C shortfalls will still score higher

• Accreditation earns program a ticket to participate in JTCP

• Positive impact on BRAC process for Installations with resident JNTC Accredited Training Programs and Certified sites

• Certification ensures adherence to Joint technical standards– Improves interoperability

Accreditation/Certification Way AheadAccreditation/Certification Way Ahead

• Conduct front-end analysis to focus Accreditation on COCOM & COCOM Component Requirements

• Selection of Training Programs and Tasks to be accredited based on this front-end analysis

• A/C outcome is a shortfall assessment provided to the program that is eligible to enter into TD requirements process once the shortfall becomes a valid requirement

• Legacy issues returned to programs

Back Up Slides

Challenge OverviewChallenge Overview

• Accreditation process had flaws that needed to be reworked

• Issues and activities were not based on a valid, relevant front end analysis

• A/C issues automatically became JWFC problems to solve

• Huge backlog prevented agility in execution

BenefitsBenefits

• Repairs structural flaws in process while retaining favorable aspects and visibility on joint training issues

• Focuses our efforts and improves linkages to Warfighter joint training priorities

• Improves fiscal accountability and effectiveness • Allows immediate reengagement with customers

and stakeholders to minimizes loss of trust

AssumptionsAssumptions

• Every “Requirement” JWFC Takes On To Solve Must Always:– Come through the COCOM-Service Component-Service vetting– Have documented basis in high level guidance and nested tasks– Be framed in terms of JMETs

• Core Capabilities Are Continuously Maintained:– Configuration management process– Developed IAW roadmaps and architectures

• Process Must Be Agile To Meet All Challenges– Some flexibility and judgment must be applied to each situation– Process procedures used are variable and situation dependent– The same parties have an interest throughout the process although the lead and

the main effort change periodically – An Integrated Product Team approach is indicated (Community of Interest)

Excellence IdentifiedExcellence Identified

The and for Joint Training The and for Joint Training

CY10 New Program Accreditation CY10 New Program Accreditation

Example: Program Not Yet Accredited

HITIs and HITRs• Irregular Warfare• Joint Intelligence• Joint Fires• Dynamic Targeting• TTP to Defeat IEDs• Strategic Communications• Information Operations• Cyberspace Operations• Personnel Recovery• Combat ID• Airspace Management• Combating WMD• Theater Air & Missile Defense• Unified Actions• Stability Operations• Maritime Interception Operations• Other

Services / USSOCOM Identify Training Programs Conducting That Task

• Venue: MARSOC Raven Training Program (29-Palms)

• Training Audience: MARSOC units

Corresponding UJTL Tasks

Prepared by JWFC TD Requirements Division and approved by CDR JWFC

•(U) OP 4.7.7 Conduct Foreign Internal Defense (FID) https://jdeis.js.mil/jdeis/ujtl_demo/ujtlData.jsp?id=2837

CY10 New Task Accreditation CY10 New Task Accreditation

Example: Program Already Accredited (New Task)

HITIs and HITRs• Irregular Warfare• Joint Intelligence• Joint Fires• Dynamic Targeting• TTP to Defeat IEDs• Strategic Communications• Information Operations• Cyberspace Operations• Personnel Recovery• Combat ID• Airspace Management• Combating WMD• Theater Air & Missile Defense• Unified Actions• Stability Operations• Maritime Interception Operations• Other

Services Identify Training Programs Conducting That Task

• Venue: Blue Flag (Hurlburt Field, FL)

• Training Audience: Numbered Air Forces• Combined Air Operations Center• Combined Force Air Component Command• Air Support Element (ASE)

Corresponding UJTL Task

Prepared by JWFC TD Requirements and approved by CDR JWFC

• (U) OP 3.1 Conduct Joint Force Targetinghttps://jdeis.js.mil/jdeis/ujtl_demo/ujtlData.jsp?id=2761

Definition: Accreditation

“A determination that a Combatant Command, Service, or component training program or organization has the capability to conduct training on joint tasks thereby providing the training audience a realistic joint environment, that includes the appropriate elements of joint context for the joint tasks, or portions of joint tasks, being trained.”

JNTC Accreditation CONOPs, 7 March 2005

Elements of Joint ContextElements of Joint Context

Those forces, control organizations, systems, and supporting infrastructure that make up the joint training environment expected to be encountered in real-world operations for specific universal joint tasks.

THREAT

FEEDBACK

EVENT CONTROL

FORCES

JOINT DOCTRINE / TTP

TRAINER SUPPORT

SYSTEMS

SCENARIOACADEMIC SUPPORT

C2 ORG

THREAT

FEEDBACK

EVENT CONTROL

FORCES

JOINT DOCTRINE / TTP

TRAINER SUPPORT

SYSTEMS

SCENARIOACADEMIC SUPPORT

C2 ORG

Definition: CertificationDefinition: Certification

“A determination that training sites and systems are compliant with specified Department of Defense (DoD) and Joint National Training Capability (JNTC) architectures, configurations, and standards required to create a supportable, realistic joint training environment.”

* In accordance with JNTC Certification CONOPs, 7 Mar 05

Certification Focus AreasCertification Focus Areas

Accreditation and Certification are linked in that certification will make certain that the systems, networks, architectures, etc., needed to produce the required elements of joint context are available, supportable and meet the established joint standards.

OPFOR / SITFOR

ENVIRON-MENTAL MGMT

C2 / IM / KML / V / C

INTEGRATION

AAR, INSTRUM-ENTATION

PROGRAM MGMT

CONFIG MGMT

INTEGRATED LOG SUPT

Interagency

Partners

Interagency

Partners

Multinational

& Coalition

Partners

Multinational

& Coalition

Partners

Accreditation Certification

THREAT

FEEDBACK

EVENT CONTROL

FORCES

JOINT DOCTRINE / TTP

TRAINER SUPPORT

SYSTEMS

SCENARIOACADEMIC SUPPORT

C2 ORG

OPFOR / SITFOR

ENVIRON-MENTAL MGMT

C2 / IM / KML / V / C

INTEGRATION

AAR, INSTRUM-ENTATION

PROGRAM MGMT

CONFIG MGMT

INTEGRATED LOG SUPT

THREAT

FEEDBACK

EVENT CONTROL

FORCES

JOINT DOCTRINE / TTP

TRAINER SUPPORT

SYSTEMS

SCENARIOACADEMIC SUPPORT

C2 ORG

OPFOR / SITFOR

ENVIRON-MENTAL MGMT

C2 / IM / KML / V / C

INTEGRATION

AAR, INSTRUM-ENTATION

PROGRAM MGMT

CONFIG MGMT

INTEGRATED LOG SUPT

Foundation of the Joint Training Environment

What is “Joint Context?”

“The joint environment necessary to accurately and realistically train individuals, units, and organizations on a specific joint task or a portion thereof. It is achieved when all required joint systems, personnel, and equipment to execute the task in real-world operations are present or accurately replicated, realistically exercised, and evaluated.”

JNTC Accreditation CONOPs, 7 March 2005