Removing Gutta-percha in tic Re Treatment

download Removing Gutta-percha in tic Re Treatment

of 1

Transcript of Removing Gutta-percha in tic Re Treatment

  • 8/4/2019 Removing Gutta-percha in tic Re Treatment

    1/1

    Clinical Significance. The challenge C-shaped cross-sectional root anatomy presentsto the clinician lies in the thickness, or lackthereof, of the canal walls that are considerablymore thin than apparent, as suggested on x-ray.Perforation when filing or fracture duringobturation is a potential threat.

    Gao Y, Fan B, Cheung GSP, et al: C-shaped canal system in mandib-

    ular second molars part IV: 3-D morphological analysis and trans-

    verse measurement. J Endod32:1062-1065, 2006

    Reprints available from B Fan or M Fan, Key Lab for Oral Biomedical

    Engineering of Ministry of Education, School & Hosp of Stomatol-

    ogy, Wuhan Univ, 65 Luoyu Rd, Wuhan 430079, China; e-mail:

    [email protected]

    Removing gutta-percha in endodontic retreatment

    Background.If root canal therapy fails, the preferred

    approach, being the most conservative choice, is retreat-

    ment. Retreatment is undertaken to regain access to the

    apical foramen by completely removing all root canal filling

    material, permitting sufficient cleaning and shaping of the

    system and final appropriate obturation. The gutta-percha

    can be removed through several methods, including new

    flexible rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) files in a slow-speed

    handpiece. The efficacy of 2 rotary NiTi instruments in

    removing gutta-percha during root canal retreatment

    was evaluated in comparison with hand instruments using

    Hedstrom files.

    Methods.A total of 60 extracted human single-rooted

    anterior teeth and premolars were instrumented and obtu-

    rated using the laterally condensed gutta-percha technique.

    Three groups of 20 teeth each were randomly formed.

    Two NiTi instruments, the ProTaper and K3, and hand

    instruments were used to remove the gutta-percha filling

    material. Roots underwent longitudinal splitting, then

    were digitally reproduced using a scanner. Areas where ma-

    terial remained were identified. In addition to efficacy, time

    required for removing the gutta-percha and amount of

    apically extruded debris were recorded.

    Results.The amount of filling material left by the 2 ro-

    tary NiTi instruments was significantly less than that left by

    the hand instruments (Table 1). The NiTi instruments also

    required significantly less time to remove the filling material

    than the hand instruments. The amount of debris removed

    was the same for each of the 3 techniques.

    Discussion.The removal of gutta-percha was

    achieved more quickly and more completely using the

    NiTi instruments than the hand instruments. All the instru-

    ments left some gutta-percha in the root canals.

    Clinical Significance.Retreatment of failingroot canal treatments depends on gaining ac-cess to the apical foramen, totally debridingthe canal, and adequately sealing it. In thisstudy, automated instrumentation was fasterand more effective than hand instruments in re-moving the old filling. No significant difference

    was noted in the amount of debris extrudedapically.

    Saad AY, Al-Hadlaq SM, Al-Katheeri NH: Efficacy of two rotary NiTi

    instruments in the removal of gutta-percha during root canalretreatment. J Endod 33:39-41, 2007

    Reprints available from SM Al-Hadlaq, Dept of Restorative Dental

    Sciences, Div of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud

    Univ, PO Box 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia; e-mail:

    [email protected]

    Table 1.Remaining Filling Material in Each Third ofthe Canal (Expressed as Percentage of Area of EachThird) for Each Technique

    Technique N Region Mean SD

    Hand 20 Apical 15.89 10.29

    Middle 11.32 5.94

    Coronal 4.50 3.51

    ProTaper 20 Apical 7.81 5.03

    Middle 5.53 3.51

    Coronal 2.78 1.79

    K3 20 Apical 8.07 5.14

    Middle 5.73 3.92

    Coronal 3.10 2.24

    (Thisarticle waspublished inJ Endod, 33, SaadAY, Al-Hadlaq SM, Al-Katheeri

    NH, Efficacy of two rotary NiTi instruments in the removal of gutta-percha

    during root canal retreatment, 39-41, Copyright American Association of

    Endodontics (2007).)

    Volume 52 Issue 5 2007 287

    mailto:[email protected]://-/?-mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://-/?-mailto:[email protected]