Removing Gutta-percha in tic Re Treatment
-
Upload
rolzilah-rohani -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Removing Gutta-percha in tic Re Treatment
-
8/4/2019 Removing Gutta-percha in tic Re Treatment
1/1
Clinical Significance. The challenge C-shaped cross-sectional root anatomy presentsto the clinician lies in the thickness, or lackthereof, of the canal walls that are considerablymore thin than apparent, as suggested on x-ray.Perforation when filing or fracture duringobturation is a potential threat.
Gao Y, Fan B, Cheung GSP, et al: C-shaped canal system in mandib-
ular second molars part IV: 3-D morphological analysis and trans-
verse measurement. J Endod32:1062-1065, 2006
Reprints available from B Fan or M Fan, Key Lab for Oral Biomedical
Engineering of Ministry of Education, School & Hosp of Stomatol-
ogy, Wuhan Univ, 65 Luoyu Rd, Wuhan 430079, China; e-mail:
Removing gutta-percha in endodontic retreatment
Background.If root canal therapy fails, the preferred
approach, being the most conservative choice, is retreat-
ment. Retreatment is undertaken to regain access to the
apical foramen by completely removing all root canal filling
material, permitting sufficient cleaning and shaping of the
system and final appropriate obturation. The gutta-percha
can be removed through several methods, including new
flexible rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) files in a slow-speed
handpiece. The efficacy of 2 rotary NiTi instruments in
removing gutta-percha during root canal retreatment
was evaluated in comparison with hand instruments using
Hedstrom files.
Methods.A total of 60 extracted human single-rooted
anterior teeth and premolars were instrumented and obtu-
rated using the laterally condensed gutta-percha technique.
Three groups of 20 teeth each were randomly formed.
Two NiTi instruments, the ProTaper and K3, and hand
instruments were used to remove the gutta-percha filling
material. Roots underwent longitudinal splitting, then
were digitally reproduced using a scanner. Areas where ma-
terial remained were identified. In addition to efficacy, time
required for removing the gutta-percha and amount of
apically extruded debris were recorded.
Results.The amount of filling material left by the 2 ro-
tary NiTi instruments was significantly less than that left by
the hand instruments (Table 1). The NiTi instruments also
required significantly less time to remove the filling material
than the hand instruments. The amount of debris removed
was the same for each of the 3 techniques.
Discussion.The removal of gutta-percha was
achieved more quickly and more completely using the
NiTi instruments than the hand instruments. All the instru-
ments left some gutta-percha in the root canals.
Clinical Significance.Retreatment of failingroot canal treatments depends on gaining ac-cess to the apical foramen, totally debridingthe canal, and adequately sealing it. In thisstudy, automated instrumentation was fasterand more effective than hand instruments in re-moving the old filling. No significant difference
was noted in the amount of debris extrudedapically.
Saad AY, Al-Hadlaq SM, Al-Katheeri NH: Efficacy of two rotary NiTi
instruments in the removal of gutta-percha during root canalretreatment. J Endod 33:39-41, 2007
Reprints available from SM Al-Hadlaq, Dept of Restorative Dental
Sciences, Div of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud
Univ, PO Box 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia; e-mail:
Table 1.Remaining Filling Material in Each Third ofthe Canal (Expressed as Percentage of Area of EachThird) for Each Technique
Technique N Region Mean SD
Hand 20 Apical 15.89 10.29
Middle 11.32 5.94
Coronal 4.50 3.51
ProTaper 20 Apical 7.81 5.03
Middle 5.53 3.51
Coronal 2.78 1.79
K3 20 Apical 8.07 5.14
Middle 5.73 3.92
Coronal 3.10 2.24
(Thisarticle waspublished inJ Endod, 33, SaadAY, Al-Hadlaq SM, Al-Katheeri
NH, Efficacy of two rotary NiTi instruments in the removal of gutta-percha
during root canal retreatment, 39-41, Copyright American Association of
Endodontics (2007).)
Volume 52 Issue 5 2007 287
mailto:[email protected]://-/?-mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://-/?-mailto:[email protected]