Remedial Design, Data Validation Report

SU?

Remedial Design

Data Validation Report

Mid-America Tannery SiteSergeant Bluff, Iowa

February 12, 1998

Prepared for:USEPA Region VII

Prepared by:Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp.

EPA Contract No.: 68-W5-0004EPA Work Assignment Number: 022-RDN-077M

BVSPC Project No.: 46108


The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is currently conductingremedial design (RD) activities at the Mid-America Tanning (MAT) Site nearSergeant Bluff, Iowa. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 as amended by the Superfund Amendments andReauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986 (i.e., Superfund program) provides the USEPAwith the authority and responsibility to establish procedures for evaluating responseactions, determining their appropriateness for specific uncontrolled waste sites, andimplementing cost-effective responses. Subpart F of the National Oil and HazardousSubstances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes methods and criteria fordetermining the appropriate extent of response authorized by CERCLA, as amendedby SARA.

As part of the work efforts, this Data Validation Report was prepared byHeartland Environmental Services, Inc., St. Charles, Missouri on surface water andsurface soil samples collected as part of an investigation to satisfy previouslyidentified data gaps for the site (BVSPC June 25, 1997). This report evaluates fivesurface water samples and 12 surface soil samples. Quality assurance and qualitycontrol samples were also evaluated during the validation and evaluation process.The Remedial Design sampling efforts were conducted as described in the planningdocuments prepared for the investigation. These documents consisted of a Healthand Safety Plan (HSP) (BVSPC June 6, 1997), a Field Sampling Plan (FSP) (BVSPCAugust 15, 1997), and a Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) (BVSPC November7, 1997). Activities in preparing this report were performed to fulfill subtasks underTask 5 of the EPA project work plan for the Mid-America Tannery site dated May7, 1997.

Results of the Data Validation process have determined the data are, exceptwhere noted, defensible, were collected in accordance with the site specific QAPPand FSP, and are useable for the intended purposes. The data are summarized inTables 1, 2, and 3. Special notations of the data include rejection of the sulfideanalyses for the surface soil samples from the Polishing Basin and qualification of theBOD analyses for the surface water samples as estimated. Details describing the datavalidation process and conclusions are provided in the following attached reports.

RAC VII Mid-America Tannery Site February 12, 1998Data Validation 46108.125-01

Table 1Results of Surface Water Analyses

Remedial DesignMid-America Tannery Site

LocationSample

No.

Analytical Results

TotalChromium

HexavalentChromium Ammonia as N

(mg/L)BOD

(mg/L)COD

(mg/L)

Oil andGrease(mg/L)

TDS(mg/L)

TSS(mg/L)

SpecificConductance(^mhos/cm)

Temperature

West AerationLagoon

SW-3 400 ND (10) ND (0.25) 94 J 85,400 ND (0.1) 19,369 74 1,580 36.4 7.58

East AerationLagoon

SW-4 1,600 ND (10) ND (0.25) ND (10) UJ 73,500 0.303 8,892 100 1,634 33 8.1

Final Clarifier SW-5 10 ND (10) ND (0.25) ND (6) UJ 9,190 ND (0.1) 2,069 21 4,230 35.9 6.58

Aeration Tank SW-6 40 [70] ND (10)[ND (10)]

ND (0.25)[ND (0.25)]

46J [55J] 4,430[137,800]

ND (0.1)[ND (0.1)]

3,048[3,111]

68 [70] 6,190 35.4 7.85

PrimaryClarifier

SW-7 ND (10) ND (10) ND (0.25) ND (3) UJ 42,520 ND (0.1) 206 10 580 35.9 8.35

= micrograms per litermg/L = milligrams per literN = nitrogenBOD = biochemical oxygen demandCOD = chemical oxygen demandTDS = total dissolved solidsTSS = total suspended solidsyumhos/cm = micromhos per centimeter°F = degrees FahrenheitJ = estimated valueUJ = reported quantitation limit is qualified as estimatedR = rejected[ ] = Duplicate resultsND (10) = Not detected at identified detection limit

Table 2Results of Surface Soil Analyses for South Field1


Grid No.

59

60

61

62

69

70

71

72

73

102

Total Chromium (mg/kg)

64

1,200

3,700

3,500

31 [32]

110

590

260

71

270Note 1: Action level a 2,000 rag/kg (95% upper confidence limit)mg/kg = milligram per kilogram[ ] = Duplicate result

Table 3Results of Surface Soil Analyses for the Polishing Basin


Location

Polishing Basin(North)

Polishing Basin(East)

Sample No.

SS-1

SS-2

Analytical Results

Total Cyanide(mg/kg)

0.25

0.20

Total Arsenic(mg/kg)

ND (0.724)

ND (0.671)

TotalChromium

(mg/kg)

2,500

3,700

TotalSulfate(mg/kg)

74.7

123

Sulfide(mg/kg)

R

R

VOCsMethod

8240B (p.g/kg)

Note 1

Note 2

Note 1: The only parameter detected was methylene chloride (4.9 ng/kg J) which is a common volatile laboratory contaminant.Note 2: The only parameter detected was methylene chloride (4.4 |t.g/kg J) which is a common volatile laboratory contaminant.J = Estimatedmg/kg = milligram per kilogramH.g/kg= microgram per kilogramND (0.724) = Not detected at identified detection limitR = rejected

HEARTLANDENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.

SDG#:Date:Client Name:Project/Site Name:Date Sampled:Number of Samples:Laboratory.Validation Guidance:

QA/QC Level:Method(s) Utilized:Analytical Fractions:


4361January 7, 1998Black and VeatchMid-America TanneryDecember 9, 19979 Aqueous Sample(s) with 1 MS/MSD(s)PDF AnalyticalFunctional Guidelines for Organic and Inorganic Data, Black andVeatch ModificationsEPA DQO Level IIISW846 Third EditionChromium, Ammonia, Chemical Oxygen Demand, BiochemicalOxygen Demand, Hexavalent Chromium, Oil & Grease, TotalDissolved Solids, Total Suspended Solids

Analytical data in this report were screened to determine usability of results and also to determinecontractual compliance relative to these requirements and deliverables. This screening assumesanalytical results are correct as reported and merely provides an interpretation of the reported qualitycontrol results. A minimum of 10% of all laboratory calculations have been verified as part of thisvalidation. All instrument output, i.e. spectra, chromatograms, etc., for each sample have beencarefully reviewed. The end-user is urged to review the Specific Findings and associated DataQualifications presented in this report. Annotated Form Is or spreadsheets for all samples reviewedare included after the Data Assessment Narratives. Form Is for MS/MSD samples or spreadsheetsare not annotated.

The releas is authorized by the following signature:

Date

4127 Plaza 94 South St. Charles. MO 63304(314) 936-1332 • Fax (314) 936-1335

SDG# 4361

Sample Identifications

Samples and Fractions Reviewed

Analytical Fractions

B&VIDSW03SW04SW05

SW05MSSW05MSD

SW06SS-120997-R

SW06DSW07

MatrixWATERWATERWATERWATERWATERWATERWATERWATERWATER

Total Billable Samples (Water/Soil)

CRXXXXXXXXX9 0

AMMXXXXXX

XX8 0

CODXXX

XX

XX7 0

BODXXX

X

XX6 0

HCRXXXXXX

XX8 0

O&GXXXXXX

XX8 0

TDSXXX

XX

XX7 0

TSSXXX

XX

XX7 0

CR= ChromiumAMM= AmmoniaCOD= Chemical Oxygen DemandBOD= Biochemical Oxygen DemandHCR= Hexavalent Chromium0&G= Oil & GreaseTDS= Total Dissolved SolidsTSS= Total Suspended Solids


SDG#:Date:Client Name:Project/Site Name:Date Sampled:Number of Samples:Laboratory:Validation Guidance:

QA/QC Level:Method(s) Utilized:Analytical Fractions:


4366January?, 1998Black and VeatchMid-America TanneryDecember 9-10, 199713 Non-aqueous Sample(s) with 1 MS/MSD(s)PDF AnalyticalFunctional Guidelines for Organic and Inorganic Data, Black andVeatch ModificationsEPA DQO Level IESW846 Third EditionVolatiles, Arsenic, Chromium, Total Cyanide, Sulfate, Sulfide

Analytical data in this report were screened to determine usability of results and also to determinecontractual compliance relative to these requirements and deliverables. This screening assumesanalytical results are correct as reported and merely provides an interpretation of the reported qualitycontrol results. A minimum of 10% of all laboratory calculations have been verified as part of thisvalidation. All instrument output, i.e. spectra, chromatograms, etc., for each sample have beencarefully reviewed. The end-user is urged to review the Specific Findings and associated DataQualifications presented in this report. Annotated Form Is or spreadsheets for all samples reviewedare included after the Data Assessment Narratives. Form Is for MS/MSD samples or spreadsheetsare not annotated.

The release s authorized by the following signature:

Date

4127 Plaza 94 South St. Charles, MO 63304(314) 936-1332 • Fax (314) 936-1335

SDG# 4366

Samples and Fractions Reviewed

Sample Identifications Analytical Fractions

B&VIDSSOlSS02SS59SS60SS61SS62

SS102SS69

SS69DSS70SS71SS72SS73

SS01MSSS01MSDSS73MS

SS73MSD

MatrixSOU.SOILSOILSOILSOILSOILSOILSOILSOILSOILSOILSOILSOILSOILSOILSOILSOIL

Total Billable Samples (Water/Soil)

VGA

:&:-::: ::i; :l

0

XX

JK; ;;-:i;

XX

4

AS

0

XX

X

XX5

CR

0

XXXXXXXXXXXXX

XX15

TCN

0

XX

2

SUL

0

XX

2

SULF

0

XX

1

VOA= VolatilesAS= ArsenicCR= Chromium

TCN= Total CyanideSUL= Sulfate

SULF= Sulfide

DATA ASSESSMENT NARRATIVES

001

DATA ASSESSMENT AND NARRATIVE

VOLATILE ORGANICS

General

The organic findings offered in this screening report assumes that all analytical results are correct asreported and is based upon the examination of the reported holding times, blank analysis results,surrogate and matrix spike recoveries, GC/MS performance, tuning results, calibration results andinternal standard areas. This report was prepared in compliance relative to the analytical anddeliverable requirements specified in the U.S. EPA SW846 Method 8240; National FunctionalGuidelines for Organic Data Review, and B&V Level HI. All comments made within this reportshould be considered when examining the analytical results (Form Fs).

SDG # 4366

A validation was performed on the Volatile Data from SDG 4366. The data was evaluated based onthe following parameters.

* • Data Completeness* • Holding Times* • GC/MS Tuning* • Calibrations* • Internal Standard Performance* • Blanks

• Surrogate Recoveries* • Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate* • Field Duplicates

• Compound Identification /Quantitation

* - All criteria were met for this parameter

Surrogates

Surrogate recoveries for all samples and blanks did not meet QA/QC criteria.

All of the samples exhibited high surrogate recoveries for toluene-dg. Qualify all positiveresults as estimated (J).

Compound Identification/Quantitation

Do not use the results for samples SS01-121097-PRA and SS02-121097-PRA, in favor ofthe original sample analysis due to non compliant surrogate recoveries.

00 0

DATA ASSESSMENT AND NARRATIVEVOLATILE ANALYSIS

PAGE - 2

System Performance and Overall Assessment

The laboratory did not encounter any large problems. The data as presented requiresqualifications.

003

GLOSSARY OF DATA QUALIFIERS

QUALIFICATION CODES

U = Not detected

J = Estimated value

UJ = Reported quantitation limit is qualified as estimated

R = Result is rejected and unusable

NJ = Presumptive evidence for the presence of the material at an estimated value

K = Result is biased high

L = Result is biased low

METHOD BLANK QUALIFICATION CODES

CRQL = The sample result for the blank contaminant is less than the sample CRQLand is less than 10X the method blank value. The sample result for theblank contaminant is rejected and the CRQL for that analyte is reported.

U = The sample result for the blank contaminant is greater than the sampleCRQL and is less than 10X the method blank value. The sample result forthe blank contaminant is qualified as non detected at the analyte valuereported.

No Action = The sample result for the blank contaminant is greater than the sampleCRQL and is greater than 10X the method blank value. The sample resultfor the blank contaminant is not qualified with any blank qualifiers.

The specific findings will be noted in numerical form on the Form Is in this data validation report.These specific finding footnotes will reflect the conclusions found in the data validation processthat resulted in the qualification of the data.

004

SUMMARY OF DATA QUALIFICATIONS

SAMPLE ID ANALYTE ID DL QL

All samples All results 4- J

5501-121097-PRA All results +/- Do not use5502-121097-PRA

DL denotes the Form I qualifier supplied by the laboratoryQL denotes the qualifier used by the data validation firm-I- in the DL column denotes a positive result- in the DL column denotes a non detect result

005

DATA ASSESSMENT NARRATIVEARSENIC, CHROMIUM AND WET CHEMISTRY

General

The inorganic findings offered in this screening report assumes that all analytical results arecorrect as reported and is based upon the examination of the reported holding times, blankanalysis results, matrix spike and LCS recoveries, matrix duplicates and calibration results. Thisreport was prepared in compliance relative to the analytical and deliverable requirements specifiedin the SW846-6010A and 9010A and EPA 375.4 and 376. IMethods; the Functional Guidelinesfor Inorganic Data Validation, February 1994, and DQO Level LEI requirements. All commentsmade within this report should be considered when examining the analytical results. Please referthe specific findings found in each category to the Summary of Data Qualification table.

SDG # 4366

A validation was performed on the Arsenic, Chromium, total Cyanide, Sulfate and Sulfide Datafrom Black & Veatch Special Projects, Mid-America Tanning/46108.123. The data wasevaluated based on the following parameters:

Data CompletenessHolding TimesBlanksMatrix Spike RecoveryMatrix DuplicatesLaboratory Control Samples

* - All criteria were met for this parameter.

Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate Recovery

1. The MSR and MSD for Sulfide was below thirty percent. All non-detect results are rejected, "R",and all positive results are qualified as estimated, "J".

006


Sample ED Analyte DL QL

All sample results Sulfide +/U J/R 1

DATA ASSESSMENT NARRATIVETOTAL & HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM AND WET

CHEMISTRY

General

The inorganic findings offered in this screening report assumes that all analytical results arecorrect as reported and is based upon the examination of the reported holding times, blankanalysis results, matrix spike and LCS recoveries, matrix duplicates and calibration results. Thisreport was prepared in compliance relative to the analytical and deliverable requirements specifiedin the SW846-6010A and 7196A and EPA 350.3, 405.1,410.4, 413.2, 160.1 and 160.2 Methods;the Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Validation, February 1994, and DQO Level HIrequirements. All comments made within this report should be considered when examining theanalytical results. Please refer the specific findings found in each category to the Summary ofData Qualification table.

SDG#4361

A validation was performed on the total and hexavalent Chromium, Ammonia as N, BOD,COD, oil & grease, TDS and TSS Data from Black & Veatch Special Projects, Mid-AmericaTanning/46108.123. The data was evaluated based on the following parameters:

Data CompletenessHolding TimesBlanksMatrix Spike RecoveryMatrix DuplicatesLaboratory Control Samples

- All criteria were met for this parameter.

Holding Times

1. The Holding Time for Biochemical Oxygen Demand was exceeded by 17 days. All positiveand non-detect sample results are qualified as estimated, "J" or "UJ".

007


Sample ID Analyte DL QL

All sample results BOD +/U J/UJ 1

008

ANNOTATED FORM Is

^ OOtt

POP Analytical Services1680 Lake Front Circle, Suite B, The Woodlands, TX 77380

LABORATORY REPORTPage 1 of 2

- . • -.-:• ••:.>.:; :•.:.:•:- ;-,> ••••::::•:;::,. VQtATttJES 8Y GC/MS: ^ .. , ,-;' •.;:.... . . ; . • : . .. :

CLIENT NAMEPROJECT NAMEPROJECT NUMBERDATE SAMPLEDSAMPLE MATRIX

: BUCK i VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS: MID AMERICA

: 12/10/97: SOIL

CLIENT SAMPLE ID : SS01-121097-PLAS SAMPLE IO : 4366.001METHOD REFERENCE : SU846-3240BDATE RECEIVED : 12/11/97PRINTED ON : 12/22/97 10:33

% MOISTUREDATE ANALYZEDINSTRUMENT IDTIME ANALYZED

: 30.94: 12/16/97: E-HP5972: 13:39

ANALYST : YZINSTRUMENT FILE : E280S.OSAMPLE WEIGHT : 5 g

[PARAMETER . •.•:•-::,-..:••• -; :---:;v;.:-;.r:*.. V-;-;.;i ;•.••-:-: ;:.>v:: iJF-1,1,1 -Trichlopoethane1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane1 , 1 -0 i ch I oroethane1 , 1 -0 i ch I oroethene1 , 2-0 ich I oroethane1 , 2-0 i ch I or ooropan*2-3utanone2-Chloroethyl2-Hexanone

vinyl ether

4-Methyl -2-pentancneAcetoneBenzeneBpomodi ch 1 oromethaneBromoformBromome thaneCarbon disulfideCarbon :e:.-ach'.cr:icChlorobenzeneChlorce thaneChloroform[Ch I oromethanecis-1 ,2-0 ich I oroethenecis-1 ,3-Oichloropropen*0 i bromoch loromethan*Ethyl benzene^lethylene chlorideScyreneTetrach I oroetheneToluenetrans-1 ,2-Oichloroetnsn«trans-1 ,3-OtchlorcorcpeneTr ich I oroetheneVinyl acetate

OU**TJTATiafe LIMIT ^ VV -SESUfl v'vir \- QUM^FtCR:7.2 UG/KG NO UG/KG !7.2 UG/KG | NO UG/KG i7.2 UG/KG | NO UG/KG ,7.2 UG/KG NO UG/KG j7.2 UG/KG | NO UG/KG |7.2 UG/KG NO UG/KG |7.2 UG/KG | NO UG/KG | !14 UG/KG | NO UG/KG |14 UG/KG | NO UG/KG |14 UG/KG | NO UG/KG j14 UG/KG NO UG/KG i14 UG/KG NO UG/KG |7.2 UG/KG NO UG/KG | j7.2 UG/KG NO UG/KG j7.2 UG/KG ND UG/KG '14 UG/KG ! NO UG/KG i7.2 UG/KG NO UG/KG |7.2 UG/KG NO UG/KG ;7.2 UG/KG NO UG/KG j14 UG/KG NO UG/KG I7.2 UG/KG NO UG/KG |14 UG/KG NO UG/KG |7.2 UG/KG NO UG/KG |7.2 UG/KG NO UG/KG ;7.2 UG/KG NO UG/KG |7.2 UG/KG NO UG/KG |7.2 UG/KG 4.9 UG/KG | J 3"7.2 UG/KG NO UG/KG J7.2 UG/K3 NO UG/KG |7.2 UG/KG NO UG/KG |7.2 UG/KG NO UG/KG |7.2 UG/KG NO UG/KG |7.2 UG/KG NO UG/KG |14 UG/KG NO UG/KG |

Git

[PARAMETER



. . • • , : . • • -.;::-:, :-;::i; T::,o;>, • -iVOEATTtESaT-GaMS;:;:::-:-;;,::: ::?-;-: .:::..::::/ -: .;. . ';;;• . • •. ; •• : :: : . • .-. ; • . |

CLIENT NAMEPROJECT NAMEPROJECT NUMBERDATE SAMPLED

SAMPLE MATRIX

: BLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS: MID AMERICA:: 12/10/97: SOIL

CLIENT SAMPLE ID :LAB SAMPLE (0 :METHOD REFERENCE :DATE RECEIVED :PRINTED ON :

SS01-121097-P4366.001SU846- 3240812/11/9712/22/97 10:38

I.: qUA-KTITATKlii LtfrE: RESULTS QUALIFIER

Vinyl chloride 14 UG/KG MO UG/KGXylene (total) 7.2 UG/KG NO UG/KG

[SURROGATE COMXXMR&Toluene-da1 ,2-Oichloroethan*-d4Bromof luorobcnzena

| 72.4 UG/KG| 72.4 UG/KG| 72.4 UG/KG

81 - 117 130 ^70 - 121 10274 - 121 90

•BATCH SUAttTir:I Q C 3ATCH I D :EVBLKL09i MS ID :4366.001HS

PREP BLANK 10 :EV8UCL09MSO 10 :4366.001MSO

LCS 10 :EVLCSL09

POP Analytical Services1680 Lake Front Circle, Suite 8, The Woodlands, TX 77380


• •:'••:-...•: .::;.;:: : ; :VatATrLES:8*-GOMS:; : y::;yy :.. . :;.-vw .:. • . . , , . . ; , . . • ..

CLIENT NAME : BLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CLIENT SAMPLf ID : SS01-121097-PRAPROJECT NAME : MID AMERICA LAB SAMPLE 10 : 4366.001RAPROJECT NUMBER : METHOD REFERENCE : SU846-32403DATE SAMPLED : 12/10/97 DATE RECEIVED : 12/11/97SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL PRINTED ON : 12/22/97 10:39

a MOISTURE : 30.94DATE ANALYZED : 12/16/97INSTRUMENT ID : E-HP5972TIME ANALYZED : 14:51

ANALYST : YZINSTRUMENT FILE : E2807.DSAMPLE WEIGHT : 5 g

I.

PARAMETER: •- • • ^ •-- . •- • :, .': :•: •' . • • -. •-:, • •- ; • y : : i; ;: ; ; i..> ; : : '•• , xy -. • : .• f:>:;: OttHtn.TATia* UJttT: :• . . f ': ; • , .. •,;. RESULTS:.: •. • : -:•-; • i ;. : : O»U.f tER1,1,1 -Trichloroethane1 , 1 ,2,2-"ecrachloroethane1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane1 , 1 -0 i ch 1 oroethane1 , 1 -0 i ch I oroethen*1 , 2-0 i ch 1 oroethan*1 , 2-0 i ch locooropane2-8utanone2-ChloPoethyl vinyl ether2-Hexanon«4-Methyl -2Acetone[Benzene

-pentanone

Bromodi ch I orome thaneBrctnoformjBroroomethaneCarbon disulf ideCaroon cecracntorideChlorobenreneChloroethaneChloroformChloromethanecis-1 ,2-Oichloro«thenecis-1 ,3-Oichlorcpropene0 i bromoch I orome thaneEthyl benzeneJMethylene chlorideStyreneTetrach loroetheneToluenetrans- 1 ,2-Oichloro«thenetrans-1,3-0 i ch I orcproperwTrichloroetheneVinyl acetate

7.2 UG/KG | ( NO7.2 UG/KG | \ NO7.2 UG/KG i \NO7.2 UG/KG | W7.2 UG/KG ! Up7.2 UG/KG | N»7.2 UG/KG | ND\14 UG/KG | N0\14 UG/KG 1 NO \14 UG/KG I NO \14 UG/KG I NO \14 UG/KG | NO \7.2 UG/KG | NO \7.2 UG/KG | NO7.2 UG/KG | NO14 UG/KG { NO7.2 UG/KG | NO7.2 UG/KG | NO7.2 UG/KG | NO14 UG/KG ! NO

7.2 UG/KG i NO14 UG/KG | NO7.2 UG/KG | NO7.2 UG/KG j NO7.2 UG/KG | NO7.2 UG/KG | NO7.2 UG/KG | NO7.2 UG/KG | NO7.2 UC/KG | NO7.2 UG/KG | NO7.2 UG/KG | NO7.2 UG/KG | NO7.2 UG/KG | MO14 UG/KG | NO

UG/KG {UG/KG |UG/KG |UG/KG |UG/KG |UG/KG |UG/KG |UG/KG |UG/KG |UG/KG |UG/KG |UG/KG 'UG/KG j !UG/KG iUG/KG |I /KG |US/KG iUff/KG ! !UG/KG i ;

UG/KG |UG/KE iUG/KQ :UG/KG \ iUG/KG \ |UG/KG \|UG/KG \UG/KG |\UG/KG I \UG/KG | \UG/KG i \UG/KG | \UG/KG I \UG/KG i \UG/KG |



: .. -.,..,..•.-.- ^;:.;-;:;-:--;.:-^.- :H;k;-;:-;::-'VOEATI^ : / . : . : |

CLIENT NAME : BLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTSPROJECT NAME : MIO AMERICAPROJECT NUMBER :DATE SAMPLED : 12/10/97SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL

CLIENT SAMPLE IDLAB SAMPLE IDMETHOD REFERENCEDATE RECEIVEDPRINTED ON

: SS01-121097-PRA I: 4366. 001 RA j: SU846-3240B |: 12/11/97 i: 12/22/97 10:39 j

i

PARAMETErl •' ' ' ": ' - : > - ' : • • • • •^^'^^•^f:.- . |; QU

Vinyl chloride |Xylene (coral) !

jwffjTWioK: cwrr14 UG/KG

7.2 UG/KG

• |» *-;; : ::} *• RESETS-: : , . 1 QUALIFIEJ? j

| \NO UG/KG | j| Hp UG/KG | j

SURROGATE COMPOW&:Toluene-481 , 2-0 i ch I oroethane-<j4B r oraof 1 uorobenzen*

72.72.72.

444

UG/KG jUG/KG |UG/KG |

81 -70 -74 -

117121121

K! \

I

125 *v 103\98

;i ^QC 3ATCH ID :£V8LXL09

MS ID :4366.001MSPREP BLANK ID :EVBUL09

MSO ID :4366.001MSOLCS ID :EVLCSLQ9

POP Analytical Services1630 Lake Front CircJe, Suite 8, The Woodlands, TX 77380


^ --.'• .•:?.;•.. : .::.;.• VOtATOES 8*601*5 --.••,: —•-, .- ' '• •

CLIENT NAME

PROJECT NAME

PROJECT NUMBERDATE SAMPLEDSAMPLE .MATRIX

: SLACK 1 VEATCH: MID AMERICA

:: 12/10/97: SOIL

SPECIAL PROJECTS CLIENT SAMPLE ID :LAS SAMPLE ID :

METHOD REFERENCE :DATE RECEIVED :PRINTED ON :

SS02-121097-P4366.002SW846-324C812/11/9712/22/97 10:39

X MOISTURE

DATE ANALYZEDINSTRUMENT ID

TIME ANALYZED

: 25.45: 12/16/97: E-HP5972: 14:15

ANALYSTINSTRUMENT FILESAMPLE WEIGHT

: YZ: E2806.0: 5 g

^AMMETER . ,V. ,, . •,x.:.:-;«;.>:::: :-.:::: ; :- •*: ":: : ,-.: j- OUMffJIATI OJfcUHIJ? " \^ '. - ' RESW.TSK . 1- tZJAtlFJES

1,1,1 -Trichloroethane 6.71, 1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 6.71 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane 6.71,1-Oichloroethane 6.71 , 1-Oichloroethene 6.71 ,2-Oichloroethane 6.71 ,2-Oichloropropane 6.72-8utanone | 132-Chloroethyl vinyl ether2-Hexanone

1313

4-Methyl-2-pentanone | 13AcetoneBenzene

136.7

Bromodichloromethane 6.7Bromoform 6.7Bromome thane 13Carbon disulfide I 6.7Carbon retrachloride 6.7CMoroOenzene 6.7Chloroethane 13Chloroform 6.7Chloronwthane 13cis-1 ,2-Oichloroethene 6.7cis-1,3-0ichloropropene 6.7Dibrotnochloromethane 6.7Ethyl benzeneMethylene chlorideStyreneTetrachloroet.ieneToluenetrans- 1 ,2-Oichloroethenetrans- 1 ,3-OichloropropeneTrichloroethereVinyl acetate

6.76.76.76.76.76.76.76.713

UG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KG

NONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONONO

NONONONO4.4NONONONONONONO

UG/KG |UG/KG |UG/KG |UG/KG !UG/KG |UG/KG |UG/KG |UG/KG !UG/KG iUG/KG |UG/KG |UG/KG i !UG/KG iUG/KG !UG/KG |UG/KG iUG/KG |UG/KG ,UG/KG I iUG/KG |UG/KG !UG/KG IUG/KG |UG/KG |UG/KG |UG/KG iUG/KG | J 3UG/KG 1UG/KG |UG/KG |UG/KG |UG/KG |UG/KG |UG/KG |



:i . --:..-.-::•• • -.- ;::;:-\-;r;;:V -::.,. -:;:vrawTILESffy5-GC/MS:::- -^^:':-\^ -^^.•if:;-:^., :'-,- - :

CLIENT NAME : BLACK S, VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CLIENT SAMPLE 10 :PROJECT NAME : MID AMERICAPROJECT NUMBER :DATE SAMPLED : 12/10/97SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL

LAB SAMPLE ID :METHOD REFERENCE :DATE RECEIVED :PRINTED ON :

SS02-121097-P4366.002SUS46-8240B12/11/9712/22/97 10:39

PARAMETER "•••• • -:- : v"" ---•..•--:-.

Vinyl chlorideXylene (total)

I QIWIH »-»«£ lUr*. UJjHtt • - *

j 13 UG/KG[ 6.7 UG/KG

£>:- •'• :; RESULTS:-: -A- [:•.. QUALIFIESNO UG/KG INO UG/KG !

SURROGATE-;. CCHPQHWI&: *f .K" ' •: -:- :-;: ;- "y •••• • - - :;:*"% : -« : (' : .t" iV ;.: f* ::SJ*OE; AOOSBSSiSpi*Tolu«n«-dS1 , 2-0 i crt I oroethan«-d4Bromof luorobenten*

67.167.167.1

UG/KGUG/KGUG/KG

•p OC?8BCOVE««:: EIHHtS? {;81 -117 |7 0 - 1 2 1 |74 - 121 |

atECOVERT

127 f10138

BATCH OUAtlTf:- CCKTHOt: SSMPtE-.QC BATCH ID :£VBLXL09

MS ID :4366.0Q1MSPREP BLANK ID :EVBLKL09

MSO ID :4366.QQ1MSOLCS 10 :EVLCSL09



j ' • . : • VOtATTLES 3Y GCAIS: -. ;;: . - . - . • ' . (

CLIENT NAME

jPIOJECT NAME

PROJECT NUMBEROATE SAMPLHO'SAMPLE MATRIX

: 3LACK t VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS: MID AMERICA

: 12/10/97: SOIL

CLIENT SAMPLE ID :LAB SAMPLE ID :METHOD REFERENCE :OATE RECEIVED :PRINTED ON

SS02-121097-PRA4366.002RASU846- 8240312/11/9712/22/97 10:39

Z MOISTURE

fOATE ANALYZED'INSTRUMENT IDIT I ME ANALYZED

: 25.45: 12/16/97: E-HP5972: 15:27


: YZ: £2808.0

•• 5 g

PARAMETER: : . :. •: • : ••;: •: ••^^~t*.:^ ••;. *::; •:,:: p OWWTITATIO*:U»m:,,--- - ' -: • REStSJS:-: : ^ OUAUFEER:1,1,1 -Trichloroethan*1 , 1 ,2,2-Fetrachloroethane1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethan«1, 1-Oichloroethar*1 , 1 -0 i ch I oroathene1 ,2-Oichloroethana1 , 2-0 i ch 1 oroppopane2-8utanone2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether2-Hexanone4-Methyl -2-peotanoneAcetsreBenzeneSromodi ch loromethaneSromoformBromomethaneCarbon disulfideCarbon tetrachlorideCh I orobenzeneChloroethaneChloroformCh loromethanecis-1,2-0ichtoro«thenecis- 1 ,3-Oichloropropene0 i bromoch lorometttan*Ethyl benzeneMethyl ene chlorideStyreneTetrachloroetheneToluenetrans-1 ,2-Oichloroethen«trans - 1 , 3 -0 i ch 1 oropr open*Tnehloroethenevinyl acetate

6.7 UG/KG | .- NO UG/KG6.7 UG/KG | \ NO UG/KG6.7 UG/KG | \NO UG/KG6.7 UG/KG ! \0 UG/KG6.7 UG/KG | *(\ UG/KG6.7 UG/KG | N0\ UG/KG6.7 UG/KG | NO \ UG/KG13 UG/KG | NO \ UG/KG13 UG/KG | NO \ UG/KG13 UG/KG I NO \ UG/KG i13 UG/KG i NO \ UG/KG13 UG/KG | NO \IG/KG

6.7 UG/KG j NO UG/KG ,6.7 UG/KG | NO UtVKG6.7 UG/KG | NO UG/XG ,13 UG/KG i NO UG/K£

6.7 UG/KG 1 NO UC/KG\6.7 UG/KG 1 NO UG/KG \ i6.7 UG/KG | NO UG/KG \| ;13 UG/KG | NO UG/KG \

6.7 UG/KG i NO UG/KG j\13 UG/KG | NO UG/KG \6.7 UG/KG I NO UG/KG \ |6.7 UG/KG | NO UG/KG \6.7 UG/KG | NO UG/KG j \6.7 UG/KG | NO UG/KG \6.7 UG/KG | NO UG/KG \6.7 UG/KG | NO UG/KG \6.7 UG/KG | NO UG/KG \6.7 UG/KG I NO UG/KG \6.7 UG/KG I NO UG/KG \6.7 UG/KG | NO UG/KG \6.7 UG/KG | NO UG/KG13 UG/KG ! NO UG/KG


LABORATORY REPORTPage Z of 2

• , - - - ' • : - . •:^-.:~ - : . : . ; / • • • • • . .VOEATTtES'SYi-QCTMS, •••^•^•^^^^••.^•.'••••[:-,. • • • • • • - - . • \

CLIENT NAME : SLACK 1 VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CLIENT SAMPLE ID : SS02- 121G97-PRA !PROJECT NAME : MIO AMERICA LAS SAMPLE 10 : 4366.002RA iPROJECT NUMBER : METHOD REFERENCE : SU846-8240BDATE SAMPLED : 12/10/97 DATE RECEIVED : 12/11/97 jSAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL PRINTED ON : 12/22/97 10:39

[PARAMETER: • - • • ;; , . . . : : • • . , . . : OBAKTITAirOK' LWF^ j? i?; v •• RESULTS!: ! QUALIFrER j

jvinyl chloride 13 UG/KG | x NOjxylen* < total) 6.7 UG/KG | \ NO

UG/KG | IUG/KG ! i

saecovERrToluene-aa1 , 2-0 i en I oroethane-dfc8 romof I Liorobenz«ne

67.167.167.1

UG/KG | 31 •UG/KGUG/KG

70 -74 -

117121121

\ I\l

\

121 >jfc-9887

OJAtnr CD»THOC::•QC 3ATCH ID :EV8UL09

MS tO :4366.001MSPREP BLANK [0 :EVBU109

USD 10 :4366.001MSOLCS 10 :EVLCSL09



: -

CLIENT NAME :PROJECT NAME :PROJECT NUMBER :

DATE SAMPLED :

SAMPLE MATRIX :

': ... ;•:;-. .. ' -.. : : : VOlATTtES BY GOMS —i >. i

3LACX & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CLIENT SAMPLE ID : SS01-121097-PMSMID AMERICA LAB SAMPLE ID : 4366.001MS

METHOD REFERENCE : SU844-8240B12/10/97 DATE RECEIVED : 12/11/97

SOIL PRIHTEO ON : 12/22/97 11:26

•X MOISTURE :

DATE ANALYZED :

INSTRUMENT ID :

TIME ANALYZED :

30.94 ANALYST : YZ

12/16/97 INSTRUMENT FILE : £2809.0E-HP5972 SAMPLE WEIGHT : 5 316:01 ;

[PARAMETER: ; :- :'.:•. : : / : • • • : - • : : . . , : • • : ::::;:..-»:K::v;;: . , /I: • • • ' : . ,:i' : : f i" QUtaKrfXtlOX: UW'Ki /

1 ,1,1-Trichloroechane I 7.2 UG/KG1 , 1,2,2-Tetracnloroethane i 7.2 UG/KG1,1,2-Trichloroetharw 7.2 UG/KG1 , 1-Oichloroethane1,1-Oichloroetherw1 ,2-Dichloroethane1 , 2-0 i ch I oropropane2-3utanone2-Chloroethyl vinyl2-Hexanone4-Methyl-2-pentanoneAcetoneBenzeneJBromoai ch I oromechaneSramoformBromomethaneCarbon disul fideCarbon tetracnlorideJCMorobenzeneChloroechaneChloroformCh I oromechane

| 7.2 UG/KG| 7.2 UG/KG| 7.2 UG/KG

7.2 UG/KG14 UG/KG

ether | 14 UG/KG| 14 UG/KG

14 UG/KG| 14 UG/KG

7.2 UG/KG| 7.2 UG/KG| 7.2 UG/KG| 14 UG/KG

| 7.2 UG/KGI 7.2 UG/KG| 7.2 UG/KG| 14 UG/KGI 7.2 UG/KGI 14 UG/KG

cis- 1,2-0 ichloroethene | 7.2 UG/KGcis-1,3-0ichloropropen« j 7.2 UG/KG0 i bromoc.h I oromethane|Echyl benzenejMethylene chlarideStyreneTetrachlorcetJieneToluene

I 7.2 UG/KG| 7.2 UG/KGI 7.2 UG/KG| 7.2 UG/KG| 7.2 UG/KG| 7.2 UG/KG

trans-1. 2-3 icl-loi cethene | 7.2 UG/KGtrans-1 ,3-Oichloropropen* i 7.2 UG/KGTric.lloroetheneVinyl acetate

I 7.2 UG/KG| 14 UG/KG

: £;• -•-•: : "• KSUtTS- • f^.QUftUrtEft:NO UG/KG !

NO UG/KG !

( NO • UG/KG |NO UG/KG |

63 UG/KG || NO UG/KG |

MO UG/KG |MO UG/KG |NO UG/KG !

NO UG/KG

NO UG/KG

NO UG/KG |

71 UG/KG

NO UG/KG i !

NO UG/KG

NO UG/KG |

NO UG/KG

NO UG/KG i

71 UG/KG

NO UG/KG

! NO UG/KG

MO UG/KG { |

NO UG/KG

MO UG/KG |

NO UG/KG :

NO UG/KG

NO UG/KG |

NO UG/KG |

NO UG/KG |79 UG/KG |MO UG/KG |MO UG/KG |

62 UG/KG !NO UG/KG |

PARAMETER



. , . ...:;,,:::.-:: • : : . . •.•. • \ vauaxE&mGGMSK:.:^-^ .' - ^hx: •.-;:: ••::'•'':.,•CLIENT NAMEPROJECT MAKEPROJECT NUMBERDATE SAMPLEDSAMPLE MATRIX

: 3LAOC £ VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS: MID AMERICA

: 12/10/97: SOIL

CLIENT SAMPLE ID :LAS SAMPLE ID :METHOD REFERENCE :DATE RECEIVED :PRINTED ON :

SS01-121097-PMS4366.001MS

SUS46- 3240312/11/9712/22/97 11:26

: RESULTS:: ! : • • QUALIFIER.

Vinyl chloride 14Xylene (total) ! 7.2

UG/KGUG/KG

NONO

UG/KG |UG/KG I

SURROGATE*. CCMPOUW : AOOCQ - tiMtrsToluen»-d31 ,2-Oichloro*than«-d4Bromof 1 uorobenzerw

I 72i 72I 72

.4

.4

.4

UG/KGUG/KGUG/KG

81 -70 -74 -

117121121

| 126i 100I 91

BATCIt BUAtrrr COXTWe::: S»Wt£:QC BATCH ID :EVBLKL09 PREP BLANK ID :EVBLXL09 LCS ID :EVLCSL09



• • • •::-.--..--:::- v: VOlATttES BY GC/MS :.-.-.. ••:•: :. :..'.- :v- • •

CLIENT NAMEPROJECT NAMEPROJECT NUMBERDATE SAMPLESSAMPLE MATRIX

: BLACK 1 VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS: MID AMERICA:: 12/10/97

SOIL

CLIENT SAMPLE ID :LAB SAMPLE ID :METHOD REFERENCE :DATE UECSIVED :PRINTED ON :

SS01-121097-PMSD4366.001MSOSU846- 3240812/11/9712/22/97 11:26

X MOISTUREDATE ANALYZED'INSTRUMENT IDTIME ANALYZED

: 30.94: 12/16/97: E-HP5972: 16:35


: YZ: £2810.0' 5 9

[PARAMETER: OUA»TIT*T: c*- RESULTS: OU*U.FJER.1,1, 1-Trichloroethane1 , 1 , 2,2-Tetrachloroethan*1 , 1 , 2-Tricflloroethane1 , 1 -Oicftloroetharw1 ,1-Oichloroethene1 ,2-Oichloroethane1 , 2-0 i ch I oroproparw2-Sutanone2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether2-Hexanone4 - Methy I • 2 - pentanoneAcetoneBenzeneBromodichloromethaneBromoformBromomethaneCarbon disulficieCarbon tatrachlorideChlorobenzeneCMoroechaneChlopofomChlorometfianecis-1 ,2-Oichtoroethenecis-1 ,3-OichloropropeneD i bromocn 1 oromethaneEthyl benzeneMethylere chlorideStyreneTetrachloroetheneToluenetrans- 1 ,2-Oichloroethenetrans- 1 ,3-OichloropropeneTrichloroetheneVinyl acetate

! 7-2! 7.2! 7.21 7.21 7.2i 7.21 7.21 1*! "1 14! 14> 14

I 7.2; 7.2i 7.2I 14I 7.2I 7.2i 7.2| 14I 7.2I 14I 7.2I 7.2I 7.2i 7.2| 7.2I 7.2I 7.2I 7.2I 7.2I 7.2I 7.2I 14


NO UG/KGNO UG/KG |NO UG/KGMO UG/KG |64 UG/KG |MO UG/KG |MO UG/KGNO UG/KGNO UG/KG |NO UG/KG iHO UG/KGNO UG/KG69 UG/KG |NO UG/KG |MO UG/KG INO UG/KG |MO UG/KG |NO UG/KG !70 UG/KGNO UG/KGNO UG/KGNO UG/KG INO UG/KGNO UG/KG |NO UG/KG |NO UG/KG 'NO UG/KGNO UG/KGNO UG/KG |73 UG/KG |NO UG/KG |NO UG/KG |62 UG/KG [NO UG/KG |



'PARAMETER

GOUS,;

CLIENT NAMEPROJECT NAMEPROJECT NUMBERDATE SAMPLEDSAMPLE MATRIX

: SLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS: MID AMERICA:: 12/10/97: SOIL

CLIENT SAMPLE ID :LAB SAMPLE ID :METHOD REFERENCE :DATE RECEIVED :PRINTED ON :

SS01-121097-PMSO4366.001MSOSVI8A4- 8240812/11/9712/22/97 11:26

•1; RESUtrS-: : QUALIFIES

Vinyl chlorideXylen* (total)

147.2

UG/KGUG/KG

NONO

UG/KG I

UG/KG :

SURROGATE COMPOUND:-Toluerw-dS I 72.41 ,2-Oichloro«than«-d4B rornof 1 uorobcnzone

72.472.4

UG/KGUG/KGUG/KG

31 -70 -74 -

117121121

I 118 i1 101 |I 95 |

IBATCH- CCttTROt: SAWtE': 10*QC BATCH ID :EVBLKL09

MS ID :4366.001MSPREP BLANK ID :EVBUL09 LCS ID :EVLCSL09

POP Analytical Services1630 Lake Front Circle, Suite B.The WoodIands,TX 77330

LABORATORY REPORT

C I i entProject MaineProject Muifcer

BLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTHID AMERICA

Client Sample 10 SS01- 121097POP Sample [0 4366.001

•P

Date Sampled :Date Received :Dace Reported :Report Nunber :

&-;;:;.;.;;s;:;3Sample Matrix:

ANALYTEArsenicChromiun

SOIL

METHODSW846-6010A

SW846-6010A

Percent

DATEPREPARED

12/15/9712/15/97

Moisture : 30.94

DATEANALYZED

12/16/9712/16/97

QUAAITTTAT1ONUMrT

0.7241.4

12/10/9712/11/9712/W97M4366.001

Units : mg/Kg

RESULT ANALYSTNO RRP2500 RRP

QC Batch 10Method Blank IDLCS IDLCSD 10MS ID^SO IDW ID

ICP

ICP8759ICPB759ICPL759ICPL7590

GFAA

4366.013MS4366.013MSO

cv

00022

POP Analytical Services1630 Lake Front Circie, Suite B,The Woodlands.TX 77380

LABORATORY REPORT

ClientProject NameProject Nunber


Client Sample 10 SS02-121097-PPOP Sample ID 4366.002

Date Sampled : . 12/10/97 jDate Received : 12/11/97Date Reported : 12/18/97Report Munber : M4366.002

Sample Matrix:

ANALYTEArsenicChromiun

SOIL

METHODLSU8A6-6010A

SW846-6010A

Percent Moisture : 25.45 Units : mg/Kg

DATEPREPARED

12/15/9712/15/97

OATEANALYZED

12/16/9712/16/97

QUANTTTATION iUMrr RESULT ANALYST i

0.671 NO RRP |1 .3 3700 RRP . |

QC Bacch 10Method Blank IDLCS 10LCSO 10MS ID:MSO IDDUP ID

ICPICP8759ICP8759ICPL759ICPL75904366.013MS4366.013MSO

GFAA cv

023

POP Analytical Services1680 Uke Front Circle, Suite B.The Woodlands.TX 77330

LABORATORY REPORT

C t i ent :Project Mame :Project Nui*>er :Client Sample ID :POP Sample ID :

BLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTMID AMERICA

SS59-120997-P4366.003

Date Sampled :Date Received :Dace Reported :Report Muitoer :

12/9/9712/11/9712/13/97M4366.003

Sample Matrix: SOIL Percent Moisture : 18.45 Units : rag/Kg

ANALYTE METHODDATE

PREPAREDDATE

ANALYZEDQUANTTTATTON

LJMJT RESULT ANALYSTChromium SW846-6010A I 12/15/97 12/16/97 1.2 64

QC Batch IDMethod Blank IDLCS IDLCSO 10MS ID

.MSO IDPUP ID

ICPICP8759ICP8759ICPL759ICPL75904366.013MS4366.013MSO

GFAA CV

02

POP Analytical Services1680 Uke Front Circle, Suite B.The Woodlands,!* 77380

LABORATORY REPORT

Cl ientProject NameProject Nunber

: 3LAOC & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECT: HID AMERICA:

Client Sample ID : SS60-120997-PPOP Sample ID : 4366.004

Date Sampled :Date Received :Date Reported :Report number :

12/9/9712/11/9712/18/97H4366.004

Sample Matrix:

ANALYTEChromium

SOIL

METHODSVI8A6-6010A

Percent Moisture : 21.56

DATEPREPARED

12/15/97

DATEANALYZED

12/16/97

QUANTTTATIONLIMIT

1.3

Units :

RESULT1200

mg/Kg

ANALYSTRRP

QC Batch IDMethod Blank IDLCS IDLCSO IDMS 10MSO IDOUP ID

ICP

IC?B759ICPB759ICPL759ICPL75904366.013HS4366.013HSO

GFAA CV

025"

t \ t \ l Ml '.->')

POP Analytical Services1680 Lake Front Circle, Suite B,The Woodlands,TX 77380

LABORATORY REPORT

Cl ientProject NameProject Nunber

: SLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECT Date Sampled :: HID AMERICA:

Client Sample ID : SS61-120997-PPOP Samole ID : 4366.005

Date Received :Date Reported :Report Number :

•: • - - •• : ,: : : :-.-.; : • • :••-,•.: -.. . :/ v---x::; :r ': •:•: •:-. :-: •:•: ; -:•:•: :•••:-: •:•• : : :-:-:.•::•: -:-: -•• -:•:•: :•:-: •••w-wwiwv-™^-" v;v' - >:j.- y j/" -^ •":•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•: :-:-x»x-:->:-x-:-:-v:->:-" ::•:•:•::•: >x-y-:-::-:-x-"

Sample Matrix:

ANALYTEChromiun

SOIL Percent Moisture : 21.69

DATEMETHOD PREPARED

SU846-6010A 12/15/97

DATE QUANT1TATIONANALYZED LIMIT

12/16/97 | 1.3

. 12/9/9712/11/9712/18/97M4366.0Q5

mm^y^y ; :v.";;x; ;:v. ;.;.?;;;•:• ;• ::: . V -:. .

Units : mg/Kg

RESULT ANALYST3700 | RRP -

*^^

QC Batch IDethod Blank 10

LCS 10

ICPICPB759[CP8759

GFAA

1CPL759

CV

LCSD tD ICPL759DIMS 10|MSO ID

iDUP 10

4366.013MS4366.013MSO

026

POP Analytical Services1680 Lake Front Circle, Suite B,The Woodlands.TX 77380

LABORATORY REPORT

ClientProject NameProject Nurber

: BLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECT: MID AMERICA:

Client Sample 10 : SS62-120997-PPOP Sample 10

W^ZiZZi'XiSSZZM*.^f3f$83%8&®m

Sample Matrix:

ANALYTEChromiun

: 4366.006

'V?W'-^?**VX*WWW:

SOIL

METHODSW846-6010A

Date Sampled :Date Received :Date Reported :Report Mwtaer :

12/9/9712/11/9712/18/97M4366.006

Percent Moisture : 22.

DATEPREPARED

12/15/97

DATEANALYZED

12/16/97

06

QUANTTTATIONUMfT

1.3

Uni ts : rag/Kg

RESULT ANALYST3500 RRP

QC Batch IDMethod Blank IDLCS 10ILCSO IDMS IDISO ID

lOUP ID

ICPICP8759ICPB759ICPL759ICPL759D4366.013MS4366.013MSO

GFAA CV

627

POP Analytical Services1680 Lake Front Circle, Suite 8,The Woodlands.TX 77380

LABORATORY REPORT

Client : SLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECT Date Sampled : 12/9/97Project Name : MID AMERICA Date Received : 12/11/97Project NuTber : Date Reported : 12/18/97Client Sample ID : SS102-120997-P Report Muitier : M4366.007POP Sample ID : 4366.007

Sample Matrix:

ANALYTEChromium

SOIL Percent

METHODSU846-6010A

DATEPREPARED

12/15/97

"m •. v-': ' •- : : • •'• • ••- !:i:;*S: :.x«:.:i: ^ JIV '•; ;,:Si:.t; ' . ;•;.; ; ;-::;: . ; . , • !

Moisture : 23.06 Units : ,ng/Kg

DATE QUANTITATIONANALYZED UMIT RESULT ANALYST

12/16/97 1.3 270 RRP

QC Batch IDMethod Blank IDLCS IDLCSO ID

,MS 10\HSO 10

DUP ID

ICP

ICP8759IC?B759ICPL759ICPL75904366.013HS4366.013MSO

QFAA CV

023

POP Analytical Services1680 Lake Front Circle, Suite B.The Woodlands.TX 77380

LABORATORY REPORT

Client : BLACK i VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTProject Name : HID AMERICAProject Number :Client Sample 10 : SS69-120997-PPOP Sample 10 : 4366.003

Date Sampled :Date Received :Date Reported :Report Number :

12/9/9712/11/9712/18/97M4 366. 003

Sample Matrix: SOIL Percent Moisture : 20.24 Units : ing/Kg

ANALYTEChromium

METHODSU846-6010A

DATEPREPARED

12/15/97

DATEANALYZED

12/16/97

QUANTTTATIONLIMIT

1.2RESULT ANALYST31 - RRP

QC Batch IDlethod Blank ID

LCSO 10

ID

ICPICPB759ICP8759ICPL759ICPL75904366.013MS4366.313MSO

GFAA CV

029

0000^7

POP Analytical Services1680 Lake Front Circle, Suite B.The Woodlands,TX 77380

LABORATORY REPORT

ClientProject NameProject Nurber

SLACK & VHATCH SPECIAL PROJECTHID AMERICA

Client Sample ID SS69-120997-0POP Sample [0

Sample Matrix:

ANALYTEChromium

4366.009


SOIL

METHODSVJ846-6010A

Percent Moisture

DATE DA'PREPARED ANALY

12/15/97 12/16/9'

: 20.25

re QUANTtTATlONZED UMfT' 1.2

12/9/97 '12/11/97 j12/18/97H4366.009

Units : ing/KgiI

I

RESULT ANALYST |32 RRP j

Kai

QC 3atdi 10Method Slanlc 10LCS 10LCSO IDMS 10HSO 10OUP 10

ICP

ICPB759ICPB759ICPL759ICPL75904366.013MS4366.013MSO

GFAA CV

030


LABORATORY REPORT

Client : BLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECT Date Sampled : 12/9/97Project Same : HID AMERICA Date Received : 12/11/97Project Nusber : Oate Reported : T2/31/97Client Sample 10 : SS70-120997-P Report Ninfeer : M4366.010POP Sample ID : 4366.010

Sample Matrix:

ANALYTEChromiun

^BiMSsSSsSS&SsSx&Si

SOIL

METHODSU&46-6010A

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Ifiii&SilPercent Moisture : 22.88 Units : mg/Kg

OATE OATE QUANTTTATIONPREPARED ANALYZED LIMIT RESULT ANALYST

12/15/97 12/16/97 1.3 110 RRP

,

QC Batch IDMethod Blank IDLCS 10LCSO 10HS IDMSP 10OUP ID

ICPICP8759ICPB759ICPL759ICPL75904366.013MS4366.013MSD

GFAA CV

G3i

POP Analytical Services1680 Lake Front Circle, Suite B.Tne Woodlands.TX 77380

LABORATORY REPORT

Client :Project Mame :Project number :Client Sample ID :POP Sample 10 :

BLACK i VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTMID AMERICA

SS71-120997-P4366.011


12/9/9712/11/9712/18/97M4366.011

ANALYTE METHODDATE

PREPAREDDATE

ANALYZEDQUANTTTATtON

UMIT RESULT ANALYSTChromium SU846-6010A I 12/15/97 12/16/97 1.2 590 RRP

QC Batch IDjMethod Blank ID

LCS IDiLCSO IDMS ID'USD !9OUP ID

1C?

ICP8759ICP8759ICPL759

GFAA CV

ICPL75904366.013MS4366.013MSD

032;

OOUO.'iO

POP Analytical Services1680 Lake Front Circle, Surte B.The Woodlands.TX 77380

LABORATORY REPORT

ClientProject Mam*Project Nurber

SLACK 4 VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTMID AMERICA

Client Sample ID SS72-120997-PPOP Sample ID

Sample Matrix:

ANALYTEChromiun

4366.012

»:•:•'• ;::';';X;:-:vW-: •:•••;-:••;:;: ::;:•'•:•;-:•:•:•• ••IOX-X-TXV-T^X-M-X>•>>:" '••; ; : i';: ;::::; :-:-:-:-:.;::'!-;>;:'::->x/;X;>x;:;ft::-ix ;&•

SOIL

OAMETHOO PREPA

SU846-6010A 12/15/9

Date Sampled : 12/9/97Date Received : 12/11/97Date Reported : 12/18/97Report Ninber : M4366.012


TE DATERED ANALYZED7 12/16/97

14 Units : mg/Kg

QUANTTTATtONLIMIT RESULT ANALYST

1.3 260 RRP ,

IC Batch IDlethod Blank ID

LCS IDLCSO ID,MS IDUSD ID

pUP 10

ICPICP8759ICPB759ICPL759

GFAA

ICPL75904366.013MS4366.013MSO

cv

033

POP Analytical Services1680 Uke Front Circle, Suite B.The Woodlands.TX 77380

LABORATORY REPORT

ClientProject NameProject Nunb«r


Client Sample 10 SS73-120997-PPOP Sample ID 4366.013

^^mm^jm^m MM:mmmmMm^mmmm^m^^^mmmm:::-.:r.:;:x-::W.t::>.x.v.:::x:. •.!•:•>:; ::-;ii-:':i f*y::*Ni-:::¥:5:*xW::;* ^ ^

Sample Matrix:

ANALYTEArsenicChromium

SOIL

METHODSU846-6010ASU846-6010A


DATEPREPARED

12/15/9712/15/97

DATEANALYZED

12/16/9712/16/97

Date Sampled : . 12/9/97Date Received : 12/11/97Date Reported : 12/18/97Report Number : M4366.013

33 Units : mg/Kg

QUANTTTAT1ONUMIT RESULT ANALYST

0.624 | 3.73 RRP1-2 I 71 RRP

QC 3atch 10iHethcd Blank IDLCS 10

ICPICPB759ICP8759ICPL759

ILCSO [0 ICPL7590IMS 10|MSD ID

|OUP ID

4366.013MS4366.013MSO

GFAA CV

034

POP ANALYTICAL SERVICES1680 Like Front Circle. Ste. 8: The toodlands. IX 77380; Phone (7131363-2233

LABORATORY REPORT

Client: BUCK 4 VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORP.Project Naee: HID AMERICAProject No: NA

Date Reoorted: 12/21/97Recoct No: I366TCNAnalyst: HHJ

NET CHEMISTRY PARAMETER: Total Cyanide

Method Reference: SN-344 9010A UNITS: ig/kg

POPLABORATORYIB

4366.0014366.002

CLIENTID

SS01-121097-PSS02-121097-P

MATRIX

SOILSOIL

DATESAMPLED

12/10/9712/10/97

DATERECEIVED

12/11/9712/11/97

DATEPREPARED

12/14/9712/14/97

OATEANALYZED

12/15/9712/15/97

QUANTLIMIT

0.500.50

RESULT

0.250.20

SPIKE RELATIVEADDED OR PERCENT

TRUE VALUE OIFF(20)

PERCEH'RECOVERY(75-125

QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

4366. 3LX14366. LCS14366. LCS24366.001MS4366.001HSD

METHOD 3LANKLAB CONTROL SAMPLELAB CONTROL SAMPLE

MATRIX SPIXEMATRIX SPIXE DUP

SOILSOILSOILSOILSOIL

NANANAHANA

NANANANANA

12/14/9712/14/9712/14/9712/14/9712/14/97

12/15/9712/15/9712/15/9712/15/9712/15/97

0.010.010.010.500.50

NO0.110.11

5.55.5

0.1000.100

5.05.0

0.0

0.0

109109105105

035

OOOO-'M

POP ANALYTICAL SERVICES1630 Lake Front Circle. Ste. 8; Tha Hoodlands. TX 77380: Phone (713)363-2233

LABORATORY REPORT

Client:'SLACK 4 VEAICH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORP. Data Reported: 12/31/1;Project (Uie: BID AMERICA Seoort Ho: I3c6SO«-Project Ho: HA Analyst: HHJ

»ET CHEMISTRY PARAMETER: Sulfate _

Method Reference: E?A 375.4 UNITS: iq/l

POP SPIKE RELATIVE PERCE?LABORATORY CLIENT OATE DATE DATE DATE QUANT ADDED OR PERCENT RECQVE5'ID [0 HAIRIX SAMPLED RECEIVED PREPARED ANALYZED LIMIT RESULT TRUE VALUE DIFF(20) (75-12

4366.001 SS01-121097-P SOIL 12/10/97 12/11/97 NA 12/20/97 50 74.74366.002 SS02-121097-P SOIL 12/10/97 12/11/97 HA 12/20/97 50 123


4366. 3LX14366. LCS14366. LCS24366. 00 IMS4366.001MSO

METHOD BLANKLAB CONTROL SAMPLELAS CONTROL SAMPLE

MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE OUP


MHAHAHAHA

HAHANAHANA

NAXANANAHA

12/20/9712/20/9712/20/9712/20/9712/20/97

5.05.0S.O5050

NO19.9619.96275275

2020200200

1U0.0 100

H

0.0 K

036

POP ANALYTICAL SERVICES1680 Lake Front Circle, Ste. 8; The Woodlands. IX 77380: Phone (713)363-2233

LABORATORY REPORT

Client:' 3LACX 4 VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORP.Project Naie: 110 AMERICAProject Ho: HA

Date Reported:Report NO:Analyst:

12/31/97I366SULHHJ

»ET CHEMISTRY PARAMETER: Sulfida

Hetnod Reference: E?A 376.1 UNITS: ig/kg

POPLABORATORYID

4366.0014366.002

CLIENTID

SS01-121097-PSS02-121097-P

MATRIX

SOILSOIL

DATESAMPLED

12/10/9712/10/97

DATERECEIVED

12/11/9712/11/97

DATEPREPARED

NANA

DATEANALYZED

12/19/9712/19/97

QUANTLIMIT

1010

RESULI

NO !NO

SPIXE RELATIVEADDED OR PERCENT

TRUE VALUE OI?F(20)

LIf?_l

PESCEJtRECOV£.<(75-121


4366. BLX14366. LCS14366. LCS24366.001ns4366.001MSO

METHOD BLANKLAB CONTROL SAMPLELAB CONTROL SAMPLE

MATRIX SPUEMATRIX SPIKE OUP


NANAHAMANA

NADADANANA

HANANAXANA

12/19/9712/19/9712/19/9712/19/9712/19/97

1.01.01.01010

NO[010NONO

10101010

10C0.0 100

(T*2iHC (&

^-— — - '

037

POP ANALYTICAL SERVICEi1630 Line Front Circle, Sts. 8; The Hoodlands. FX 77330; Phone (713)363-2233

LABORATORY REPORT

Client: NAProject Ha«: NAProject Huiber: HA

POP MS 10: 4366.013KSPOP (ISO ID: 4366.013HSO

Report NuePer:I366«013

TOTAL METALS (MATRIX SPUE AHO MATRIX SPUE DUPLICATE)

PERCENT MOISTURE: 19.33

Date Saipled: XAData Received: .HAData Reportad: 12/19/9—

Saaoia Matrix: HATER Units: ag/L

ELE.1ENT

Arsenic

METHODDATE DATE

PREPARED ANALYZED

MATRIX MATRIX PERCENT MATRIXSAMPLE SPUE SPUE RECOVERY SPUE OUPVALUE ADDED VALUE (75-125) VALUE

PERCENTRECOVERY 3PO-(75-125) (20)

SM46-6010A 12/15/97 12/16/97SX846-6010A 12/15/97 12/16/97

3.7371

249.524.95

23197 104

236100

91116


1C? Method Blank ID:9FAA Method Blank ID:CVAA Method Slank ID:

ICP8759NANA

ICP LCS ID: ICPL759SFAA LCS ID: XACVAA LCS ID: NA

ICP LCSD ID: ICPL7590SFAA LCSO ID: NACVAA LCSD ID: NA

ICP MS ID: NA6FAA MS ID: NACVAA NS ID: NA

1C? NSD ID: NASFAA NSO IO:NACVAA NSD 10:HA

* : lnd.ica.tH tn« "lu« is outside control litits." : High analyta concentration prevented accurate detereination of tfte utrix spika recovery.0 : The saeple required a post-digest (instrument) dilution resulting in a dilution of the iatrix spike added.

033

POP Analytical Services1680 Lake Front Circle, Suite B.Ttie Wood1ands,TX 77380

LABORATORY REPORT

ClientProject NameProject NumberClient Sample IDPOP Sample ID


SU03-120997-P4361.001

Date Sampled :Date Received :Date Reported :Report Nuntoer :

12/9/9712/10/9712/18/97M4361.001

ANALYTE METTHOODATE

PREPAREDDATE

ANALYZEDQUANTTTATION

UMfT RESULT ANALYSTChromium SVI&46-6010A 12/15/97 12/16/97 0.01 0.40 RRP

QC Batch ID^ethod Blank IDLCS IDLCSO IDMS IDMSO IDOUP ID

ICPICP8760ICP8760ICPL760ICPL76004361.003HS4361.003MSD

GFAA CV

039

POP Analytical Services168Q Lake Front Circle, Suite B,The Woodlands.TX 77380

LABORATORY REPORT

ClientProject NameProject Number

: BLACX & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECT Date Sampled :: MIO AMERICA

:Client Sample (0 : SU04-120997-PPOP Sample ID : 4361.002

Date Received :Date Reported :Report Number :

Sample Matrix:

ANALYTEChromium

WATER

METHODSU846-6010A

Percent Moisture : 0

DATEPREPARED

12/15/97

DATE JQUANTJTAT1ONANALYZED | UMfT

12/16/97 ! 0.01

12/9/9712/10/9712/18/97H436 1.002

iilllilliiililil:i:;::i;:

Units : mg/L

RESULT ANALYST1 .6 RRP

QC Batch IDMethod Blank IDLCS 10LCSO 10MS IDHSD IDJOUP ID

ICPICP8760ICPB760ICPL760ICPL76004361.003MS4361.003MSO

GFAA cv

040

POP Analytical Services1680 Uke Front Circle, Suite B.The Woodlands,TX 77380

LABORATORY REPORT

Client :Project Hame :Project Number :Client Sample ID :POP Sample IO :


SU05-120997-04361.003

Date Sampled :Date Received :Date Reported :Report Murcber :

12/9/9712/10/9712/18/97N4361.003

ANALYTE METHODDATE

PREPAREDOATE

ANALYZED;QUANTTTATION! LIMIT RESULT ANALYST

Chromiun SU846-6010A 12/15/97 112/17/97 a.01 o.oi I RRP

OC Batch 10Method Blank IDLCS IDLCSO [0MS IDJMSO IDDUP ID

ICPICPB760ICP3760ICPL760

GFAA

ICPL76004361.003MS4361.003MSO

CV

041


LABORATORY REPORT

ClientProject MameProject MumBer

: SLACK 1 VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECT Date Sampled :: MIO AMERICA:

Client Sample 10 : SU06-120997-PPOP Sample 10 : 4361.004

Date Received :Date Reported :Report Munber :

12/9/9712/10/9712/18/97M436 1.004

Sample Matrix:

ANALYTEChromiun

WATER Percent Moisture : 0

DATEMETHOD PREPARED

SU846-6010A 12/15/97

DATE QUANTJTAT1ONANALYZED LIMIT

| 12/17/97 0.01

Units : mg/L

RESULT ANALYST0.04 ! SRp

;QC Batch IDMethod Blank IDLCS 10LCSO 10MS 10

IDOUP ID

ICPICP3760ICPS760ICPL760

GrAA

ICPL7600i361.003MS4361.003MS)

cv

042


LABORATORY REPORT

Cl ientProject NameProject Number


Client Sample ID SS -1 20997- RPOP Sample ID 4.36 1.005

Date Sampled : . 12/9/97Date Received : 12/10/97Date Reported : 12/18/97Report Nunber : M4 36 1.005

Sample Matrix:

ANALYTEChromiun

UATER

METHODSUa^S-6010A

Percent Moisture : 0 Units : mg/L

DATE CPREPARED ANAI

12/15/97 12/17/

ATE QUANTlTATtON.YZED UMfT RESULT ANALYST97 j 0.01 NO RRP

!;«;lli;;P

QC Batch IDMethod Blank IDLCS IDLCSO IDMS 10MSO IDOUP 10

ICP

ICP8760

GFAA

ICPB760 . |ICPL760ICPL76004361 .003MS4361.003MSO |

CV

I I

G4C

POP Analytical Services1680 Lake Front Circle, Suite B,The Woodlands.TX 77380

LABORATORY REPORT

Client :Project Name :Project Nunber :Client Sample 10 :POP Sample [0 :


SU06- 120997-0436 1.006

Date Sampled :Date Received :Date Reported :Report Nunbcr :

12/9/9712/10/9712/18/97M436 1.006

ANALYTE METHODDATE

PREPAREDDATE

ANALYZEDQUANTTTAT10N

LIMIT RESULT ANALYSTChromium SU846-6010A I 12/15/97 12/17/97 0.01 0.07 RRP

OC Batch IDMethod Blank 10LCS IDLCSO ID,NS IDUSD IDOUP ID

1C?ICP3760ICP8760ICPL760ICPL76004361.003MS4361.003MSO

GFAA CV

04 **


LABORATORY REPORT

Cl i ent :Project Name :Project Number :Client Sample ID :POP Sample ID :

.. ............... .........................................

SLACK i VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTMID AMERICA

SU07-1 20997- P4361.007

................................. _ ...... .........,v.. .....................


..........

. 12/9/9712/10/9712/18/97H436 1.007

Sample Matrix: UATER Percent Moisture : Units : mg/L

ANALYTEChromium

METHODSU846-6010A

DATEPREPARED

12/15/97

DATEANALYZED

12/17/97

QUANTTTATIONLIMIT

0.01RESULTNO

ANALYST jRRP |

^y&ijlSSgff:^

OC Batch IDMethod Blank IDLCS IDLCSO IDMS IDMSO IDDUP ID

1C?

ICP8760ICP8760ICPL760ICPL76004361.003MS4361.003MSO

GFAA CV

G4o

'OP ANALYTICAL SERVICES1680 LaM Front Circle. 3t3. 3: The 4ooalanas. U 77330: Phone (7131363-2233

LABORATORY REPORT

Client: 8LACX 4 VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORP.Project Maie: HID AMERICA

Project Ho: HA

Date Reoorted: 12/30/5Reoort .to: I361A«lT

Analyst: HMJ

HET CHEMISTRY PARAMETER: fljionu is X

Method Refarence: ERA 350.3

POPLA80RATORYID

436143614361436143614361

CLIENT10 MATRIX

.001

.002

.003 '

.004

.006

.007

SH03-120997-?SX04-120997-PSH05-120997-0SH06-120997-?SH06- 120997-05X07-120997-?

MATERHATERNATERHATERHATERHATER

DATESAMPLED

12/09/9712/09/9712/09/9712/09/97L2/09/9712/09/97

OATE OATE OATERECEIVED PREPARED ANALYZED

12/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/97

MAMAMAMAMAMA

12/20/9712/20/9712/20/9712/20/9712/20/9712/20/97

QUANTLIMIT

0.0.0.0.0.0.

252525252525

UNITS: ig/L

SPIKE RELATIVE ^KCE^AOOED OR PERCENT RfCOV:

RESULT TRUE VALUE OIFF(20) 17S-:.:.

MOMOMO -MONOMO _


4361436143614361

.HLCS1

.XLCS2

.001MS

.001NSO

LA8 CONTROL SAMPLELA8 CONTROL SAMPLE

MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIXE OUP

HATERHATERHATERHATER

MAHAMAMA

MAMANAMA

MAMAMAMA

12/20/9712/20/9712/20/9712/20/97

0.0.0.0.

25252525

5.4 5.0 U5.4 5.0 0.0 104.7 5.0 944.9 5.0 4.2

04C

\' >'

POP ANALYTICAL SERVICES1630 LiKe Front Circle, Sta. 3: Tha Hooolinds, FX 77380; Phone (713)363-2233

LABORATORY REPORT

Client:'BLACK i VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORP.Project ,1ai«: HID AMERICA

Project Mo: MA

Data Raoorted: 12/31/97Reoort Mo: [3ol3QO

Analyst: SU3

«£T CHEKISTRY PARAMETER: Siocftetical Oxygen Oetand (COO)

Hec.lod Reference: E?A 405.1 UNITS: ig/L

POPLABORATORYID

436143614361436143614361

.001

.002

.003

.004

.006

.007

CLIENTID

SK03-120997-PSH04-120997-P5HOS- I 20997-0SW6-120997-PSK06-120997-03X07-120997-P

MATRIX

MATERHATER

" HATERHATERHATERHATER

DATESAMPLED

12/09/9712/09/9712/09/9712/09/9712/09/9712/09/97

DATERECEIVED

12/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/97

DATEPREPARED

MNAHAHAHAHA

DATEANALYZED

12/29/9712/29/9712/29/9712/29/9712/29/9712/29/97

QUANTLIMIT

6010630303

SPIXE RELATIVE PERCtMiAOOED OR PERCENT .RECOVER

RESULT TRUE VALUE OIFFI20) (75-125!

94 3NO U5lNO U.3I46 "\55 3\MO VJUSl

All saiples »ers analyzed outside the recoitended holding tii«.

... 047

(IOOO23

POP ANALYTICAL SERVICES1630 Lake Front Circle. Sta. 3: The noooUnas. TX 77330; Phone (713)363-2233

LABORATORY REPORT

Client: JUCX 4 VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORP.Project Haie: ,110 AMERICA

No: *A

Date Reoorted: 12/30/sReoort Ho: I361CGO-

Analyst: HHJ

NET CHEMISTRY PARAMETER: Cheiical Oxygen Oetaixi (COO)

Netftod ftsference: E?A 410.4 UNITS: ig/L

POPLABORATORYID

436143614361436143614361

.001

.002

.003

.004

.006

.007

CLIEHTID

SK03-120997-PSH04-120997-PSXOS-120997-0SN06-120997-?5*06-120997-0SM07-120997-P

MATRIX

UtERMATERMATERMATERMATERMATER

DATESAMPLED

12/09/9712/09/9712/09/9712/09/9712/09/9712/09/97

DATERECEIVED

12/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/97

DATEPREPARED

HAHAHANAMAHA

DATEANALYZED

12/19/9712/19/9712/19/9712/19/9712/19/9712/19/97

QUANTLIMIT

2SOO25002500250025002500

SPIKE RELATIVE ?£RCt!TADDED OR PERCEMT RECOV?:

RESULT TRUE VALUE OIFF(20) (75-12

854007350091904430

13730042520


4361.N8LK14361.KLCS1436LMLCS24361.0010

METHOD BUNKLAB CONTROL SAMPLELAS CONTROL SAMPLE

DUPLICATE

MATERMATERMATERMATER

NANANANA

NANANANA

NANANANA

12/19/9712/19/9712/19/9712/19/97

252525

2500

NO147147

35400

150150 0.0

0.09

048

rsnc :;:rcl3.= ?

7hg ^7330: Phone . 7 1 3 ]

LABORATORY REPORT

Cliint;. 3LACX 4 VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORP.?-oiec: Naaa: .110 AMERICA

No: NA

Oata Reoortea: L 2 / 1 2 / 9 "Reso,-: No: I3iihC^

Analys:: HMJ

KET CHEMSTRY PARAMETER: Hexavalenc Chraiiui

Ms'.iiod 7196A JNITS: jo/L

PC?LABORATORY10

136113611361436143611361

.001

.002

.003

.004

.006

.007

CLIENTID

3K03-120997-PSH04-120997-03X05-120997-0SK06-120997-?5H06- 120997-0SX07-120997-P

MATRIX

^ATERKATESJA7ERKATESIATESKATER

DATESAMPLED

12/09/9712/09/9712/C9/9712/09/9712/09/9712/09/97

DATERECEIVED

12/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/97

DATEPREPARED

NANANANANANA

DATEANALYZED

12/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/97

QUANTLIMIT

0.0.0.0.0.0.

010101010131

3?!:<E RELATIVE ?E=C:.tADDED ]R PERCENT RECOVER'

RESULT TRUE VALUE 0 IFF CO! (7;-i2:

NOHONOHONDNO

OUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

4361.48LX14361. KLCSl4361.KLCS2436L303MS4361.003,150

METHOD 3LANXLAS CONTROL SAMPLELAS CONTROL SAMPLE

MATRIX SPIKEMATRIX SPIKE DU?

KATESKATESKATESKATES4ATES

HANANAHANA

NANANAHANA

NAHANAHANA

12/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/97

0.010.010.010.010.01

HO0.2670.2670.2060.208

0.250.2So.:s0.25

0.0

1.0

;071073-

33

1680 Lake Front Circle.

Client:Project Naie:

Project Ho.:

:' 3LA« & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORP.: HID AMERICA: HA

POP ANALYTICAL SERVICESSte.8: The Moodlands. Texas: 77380

LABORATORY REPORT

(713)363-2233

PARAMETER: OIL 4 SREASE

Method Reference: EPS 413.2

POPLABORATORYID

436143614361436143614361

.001

.002

.003.004.006.007

CLIENTID

SM03-120997-PSX04-120997-PSH05-120997-0SH06-120997-PSW6- 120997-0SK07-120997-P

MATRIX

MATERMATERMATERMATERMATERMATER

DATESAMPLED

12/09/9712/09/9712/09/9712/09/9712/09/9712/09/97

DATERECEIVED

12/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/97

DATEEXTRACTED

12/22/9712/22/9712/22/9712/22/9712/22/9712/22/97

DATEANALYZED

12/23/9712/23/9712/23/9712/23/9712/23/9712/23/97

OUANTLIMIT

0.0.0.0.0.0.

111111

Data Rewrted: 12/30/97Reoort Ho.: I361TPH

Analyst: C?

Units: ig/L

SPUE ADDED RELATIVE PERCENTOR PERCENT RECOVERY

RESULT TRUE VALUE OIFF(30) (50-150)

NO0.303

HO " -KONOHO _


4361.M8LX14361.MLCS14361.007MS4361.007MS

METHOD BLANKLAB CONTROL SAMPLE

MATRIX SPUEMATRIX SPIKE OUP

MATERMATERMATERMATER

HAHAHAHA

KAHAHAMA

12/22/9712/22/9712/22/9712/22/97

12/23/9712/23/9712/23/9712/23/97

O.t0.10.20.2

HO4.259.323.98

5.10.10.

000 3.7

a93"90

•KQi

050

0000^6

POP ANALYTICAL SERVICES1630 Laxe front Circle. Ste. 8; The Kooalands, IX 77380: Phone (713)363-2233

LABORATORY REPORT

Client:- 3LACX 4 VWTCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORP.Prajac: Hate: MID AMERICA

Project Ho: NA

Date Reoorted: 12/30/97Reoort Ho: I361TOS

Analyst: HMJ

KET CHEMISTRY PARAMETER: Total Dissolved Solids (TOS!

Mecriod R e f e r e n c e : E?A 160.1 UNITS: iq/l

POPLABORATORY10

4361.4361.4361.4361.4361.4361.

001002003004006007

CLIENT[0

SW03-120997-PSH04-120997-PSKOS- 120997-0SH06-120997-?SN06-120997-0SK07-120997-P

MATRIX

HATERHATERIATERHATERHATERHATER

DATESAMPLED

12/09/9712/09/9712/09/9712/09/9712/09/9712/09/97

OATERECEIVED

12/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/97

OATEPREPARED

DANAMA 'NANANA

OATEANALYZED

12/11/9712/11/9712/11/9712/11/9712/11/9712/11/97

QUANTLIMIT

10.10.10.10.10.10.

000000

SPUE RELATIVE PESCEH1AOOED OR PERCENT RECOVERY

RESULT TRUE VALUE OIFF(20) (75-125':

193693892206930483111206


4361.H8LX1 METHOD BLANK HATER NA NA NA4361.HLCS1 LAS CONTROL SAMPLE HATER NA NA NA4361.HLCS2 LAB CONTROL SAMPLE HATER NA NA HA4361.OOLD DUPLICATE HATER NA HA NA

12/11/9712/11/9712/11/9712/11/97

10. 010.010.310.0

NO470.0470.019362

500SOO 0.0

0.0

?494

051

POP ANALYTICAL SERVICES1630 Lane Front Circle. 3la. 3: The Woodlands. TX 77380: Phone (713)363-2233

LABORATORY REPORT

Client:' 8LACX 4 VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORP.Project Mate: HID AMERICA

Project No: HA

Date Reportad: 12/30/97Seoort Ho: I36iT53

Analyst: HNJ

HET CHEMISTRY PARAMETER: Total Susotnded Solids (TSS)

Method Reference: £?A 160.2

POPLABORATORYID

436143614361436143614361

CLIENTID MATRIX

.001

.002

.003

.004

.006

.007

SM03-120997-PSH04-120997-PSH05-120997-0SH06-120997-PSH06-120997-0SH07-120997-P

HATERHATERHATERHATERHATERHATER

DATESAMPLED

12/09/9712/09/9712/09/9712/09/9712/09/9712/09/97

DATE DATE DATE QUANTRECEIVED PREPARED ANALYZED LIMIT

12/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/9712/10/97

HAHAHAHAHAHA

12/11/9712/11/9712/11/9712/11/9712/11/9712/11/97

101010101010

'.0.0.0.0.0.0

UNITS: iq/L

SPUE RELATIVE PERCcHADDED OR PERCENT RECOVE*

RESULT TRUE VALUE OIfr(20) (75-125

7410021 -637010 _

QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL ~

4361436143614361

.HBLX1JLCS1.HLCS2.0010

METHOD 3LANKLAS CONTROL SAMPLELAS CONTROL SAMPLE

DUPLICATE

HATERHATERHATERHATER

XAHAHAHA

NAHAHAHA

NAHANAHA

12/11/9712/11/9712/11/9712/11/97

10101010

.0

.0

.0

.0

HO54 50 ICE-53 50 1.9 10630 7.3

05?

POP ANALYTICAL SERVICES1630 laxe front Circle, Ste. 3; The Hooalands, IX 77330: "hone (713)363-2233

LABORATORY REPORT

Client: NAProject Nase:. HAProject Nuiber: HA

POP MS ID: 4361.003HSPOP USD ID: 4361.003MSO

Reoort ituibar:I3&inS03

TOTAL METALS (MATRIX SPIXE AHO .1ATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE)

Date Sajoled: HADate Received: HAData Reportad: 12/19/9'

Matrix: '4ATE3 :Jni:s: ig/L

£L£.1ENT

C^roaiua

DATE DATEPREPARED ANALYZEDMETHOD

SM846-6010A 12/15/97 12/17/97

MATRIX MATRIX PERCENT MATRIXSA«PLE SPIKE SPIXE RECOVERY SPIXE OUPVALUE ADDED VALUE (75-125) VALUE

PERCENTRECOVERY .iPO(75-125) (20)

0.01 0.20 0.20 95 0.20 95 O.J

WALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL

1C? LCS

1C? MethodSPAA MethodCVAA Method

Blank31ankBlank

ID:ID:ID:

ICPB760NAHA

6FAACVAA

1C?6FAACVAA

LCSLCS

LCSOLCSOLCSO

ID:ID:ID:

ID:ID:ID:

ICPL760HANA

ICPL7600NANA

1C?GfAACVAA

ICPSFAACVAA

MSMSMS

MSOMSOMSO

ID:ID:ID:

ID:IDID

NANANA

NA:NA:NA

* - Indicates the value is outside control liiits." : High analyte concentration prevented accurate deteriination of tin utrix spike recovery.0 • The saaple required a post-digest (instrument) dilution resulting in a dilution of the latrix spike added.

05:

DATA VALIDATION WORKSHEETS

i 05

t^it9 ; - . • - - •


MULTI-MEDIA VOLATILE ORGANIC FRACTION

CASE/SDG NUMBER:

LABORATORY:

CLIENT:

PROJECT:

REVIEWER:

DATE:

QA/QC LEVEL:

STATEMENT OF WORK:

4366

PDF Analytical Services

B&V

MID AMERICA

Daniel J. Heil, A.V.P.

January 8, 1998

LEVELH

SW846 8240

ANALYSIS MODIFICATIONS: NONE

NUMBER OF SAMPLES:

SAMPLE MATRIX:

NUMBER OF MS/MSDs:

SOIL

05!

HEARTLAND ESI VGA HESI96.1

MULTI-MEDIA VOLATILE ORGANIC FRACTION

HOLDING TIMES

CLP/SW846: 14 days from date of sampling (If properly preserved)Region I : 10 days from VTsRRegion III : 14 days from date of sampling (If properly preserved)NYSDEC : 7 days from date VTSR

Action: DA - The number of days that the holding time was exceeded.

DA $ 5: Qualify all positive results as estimated (J).DA > 5 s 15: Qualify all positive results as estimated (J) and all non detects

estimated (UJ).DA > 15: Qualify all positive results estimated (J) and reject all non detects.

All associated samples met holding time requirements for analysis. No qualifications arerequired.

05C


MULTI-MEDIA VOLATILE ORGANIC FRACTIONBLANK SUMMARY

1. Blank qualification guidelines:

a) If a compound is found in the blank but not in the sample, no action is taken.

b) Any compound (other than the four (4) listed below) detected in the sample,which was also detected in the associated blank, must be qualified by elevatingthe limit of detection or adjusting the limit of detection to the sample result,when the sample concentration is less than five (5) times the blankconcentration. For the following four (4) compounds, the results are qualifiedby elevating the limit of detection or adjusting the limit of detection to thesample result, when the sample concentration is less than ten (10) times theblank concentration.

Common laboratory contaminants: methylene chlorideacetone2-butanone

c) The reviewer should take note that the blank analysis may not involve the sameweights, volumes or dilution factors as associated samples. These factors mustbe taken into consideration when applying the 5X and 10X criteria.

d) In addition, the reviewer must review the trip blanks, rinseate blanks andfield blanks (if they were submitted with the data package) and all associatedsamples. Apply the same data validation guidelines used in assessing themethod blanks.

e) Qualification/Action codes:

U - The sample result is greater than the CRQL and less than tentimes (10X) the blank value. Cross out the "B" flag and qualify thesample result with a "U".

CRQL - The sample result is less than the CRQL and less than tentimes (10X) the blank value. Reject the sample result, cross out the "B"flag, and report the CRQL.

No Action - The sample result is greater than the CRQL and greater thanten times (10X) the blank value.

057

POP Analytical Services1680 Uke Front Circle, Suite B, The Woodlands, IX 77380


•••: •.••••••• .:•:, -.•::..•.• \«>eATKESE.B«:GCIIISKv.:X-:?. i!;"? V ;: • ,-' ,;• V^; -• . .

CLIENT NAME :PROJECT NAME :PROJECT NUMBER :DATE SAMPLED :SAMPLE MATRIX : SOLID

CLIENT SAMPLE ID :LAS SAMPLE 10 :METHOD REFERENCE :DATE RECEIVED :PRINTED ON :

PREP SUNKEVBLKL09SVI846-8240B

12/22/97 11:25

X MOISTUREBATE ANALYZED : 12/16/97INSTRUMENT ID : E-HP5977|T I ME ANALYZED : 10:34


: YZ

: S2800.D= 5 g

PARAMETER1,1, 1 -Trichloroethane1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane1, 1-Oichloroethane1 , 1-Oichloroethene1 , 2-0 i ch I or oethane1 ,2-Oichloropropane2-3utanone2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether2-Hexanone4-Methy I - 2- pentanoneAcetoneBenzeneBromodi ch 1 oromethanejBromoformBromome thaneCarbon disulfideCartoon cetrach'.orideChlorotaenzeneChloroethaneChloroformCh 1 o cornet .lanecis-1 ,2-Oichloroethenecis-1 ,3-Oichloropropen«0 i bromoch I orome thaneEthyl benzeneWethylene chlorideScyreneTetrachloroetheneToluenetrans- 1 , 2-0 i chloroethenetrans-1 .S-OichloroprcpeneTricnloroethereVinyl acetate

I 5.0I 5.0I 5.0| 5.0I 5.0I 5.0I 5.0i 10I 10i 10! 10

I 10i 5.0i 5.0I 5.0| 10; 5.0| 5.0I 5.0I 10I 5.0I 101 5.01 5.01 5.0| 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.0! 5.01 5.0i 5.01 10


NO UG/KGNO UG/KGNO UG/KGNO UG/KGNO UG/KG iNO UGAGMO UG/KGNO UG/KGNO UG/KG |NO UG/KGNO UG/KGNO UG/KG |NO UG/KGNO UG/KG iNO UG/KGNO UG/KGNO UG/KGNO UG/KGNO UG/KG ,NO UG/KGNO UG/KG iNO UG/KGNO UG/KGNO UG/KGNO UG/KGNO UG/KG |NO UG/KGNO UG/KGNO UG/KGNO UG/KGNO UG/KGMO UG/KGMO UG/KGNO UG/KG

(35C0000:^3


MS/MSO SUMMARY REPORTPage t of 1

VOLATItES BY ;GC/MSK,'

CLIENT NAME : SLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORP.PROJECT NAME : MIO AMERICAPROJECT NUMBER :

SAMPLE MATRIX : SOIL

SAMPLE

SAMPLE !D : 4366.001

CLIENT SAMPLE ID : SS01-121097-P

DATE ANALYZED : 12/16/97

INSTRUMENT FILE : £2805.0

. • V " I - : . : , v; ::.-.•>;,..::- •.:,...:•: ;,>,,: :.::::< i: . . ;-.;-..

;<:;,••••• ; . ' " : : : :' ••: • -V :; ". $ -^^liy^Si£ &!l

1 , 1-Oichloroethene | UG/Benzene UG/CMorooenzene . UG/Toluene UG/TrictUoroethene UG/

DATE RECEIVED : 12/11/97PRINTED ON : 12/22/97

.METHOD REFERENCE : SU846- 32408

MATRIX^PIKE^ MATRIX SPIKE

MS SAMPLE ID : 4366.001MS

DUPLICATEMSO SAMPLE ID : 4366.001MSO

CLIENT SAMPLE ID : SS01-121097-PMS CLIENT SAMPLE ID : SS01- 121097-PMSD


INSTRUMENT FILE : E2809.0

; • ; ; • ; MS- ••;:*f:::MSDs.-, ;:•:.:.; •.:::::;..lij ;;S«XE::; :SPIKET

:: .OWPts;-T'S- JADDsbi :AOoen-i;; cnwrKKG 72. 41 72. 4 1 0KG 72. 41 72.4 0KG 72. 4| 72. 41 0KG 72. 41 72.4 0KG 72. 4j 72. 4 j 0

iarcMia67.6 6


INSTRUMENT FILE : £2310.0

':::?:-; *s*:m:^BS£ ;. fJECOVEST

A.I I 9371.3,' 68. 8 I 9971.5 778.9 762.4 6

TJ.1 993.4| 1091.71 36

WO': : - . : . •

RECOVfER*:

399597

10135

Pi»ffi'4.4

4.1

2.07.61.2

:-:RPO;.:; jac: UMITLIWTT t ::::REC.

22! 59-17221 1 66 - !4221! 60 • 133211 59- 13924i 62- 137

Indicate values outside of OC limitsRPO : 0 out ofSpike Recover/ : 0 out of

5 outside limits10 outside limits

05'



: . :. .- ,; : • - ' : : • i."'; '..•: :"h; ' '. VOUG1IJE&BrGCM^^m\;*-- ' ::.:.- . - - ' ' • • : ^'.. ••.•.'.;',••:.".•:• • \

CLIENT NAME :PROJECT NAME :PROJECT NUMBER :DATE SAMPLED :SAMPLE MATRIX : SOLID|

CLIENT SAMPLE ID :LAB SAMPLE ID :

METHOD REFERENCE :DATE RECEIVED :PRINTED ON :

PREP BLANK !EVBLKL09 iSU846-82408 {

1

12/22/97 11:25 i

'PARAMETER' • •• :' •; •• : : -••• : • " '"••••• J- OUAKtltKHaJ* El»n:: • • • • { • : : .-'•' ; -,--.• -RESUBitS? -:-: i GUAUrlE^j

Vinyl chloride 10 UG/KG NO UG/KGXylene (total) 5. 0 UG/KG NO UG/KG

: Afloat::Toluene-dS1 , 2-0 i ch I oro*tftan*-d4Bromof I uorobenzene

50.050.050.0

UG/KG |UG/KG |UG/KG |

81 -70 -74 •

117121121

107| 98| 104

QUALITY CCHTHee: SAHPt£;:IO*sQC BATCH 10 :£VBLKLQ9 PREP BLANK ID :EVBLKL09

060



;//r •• v--' ;;: :' v: . <xW^ "V--:.CLIENT NAME :PROJECT NAME :PROJECT NUMBER :DATE SAMPLED :SAMPLE MATRIX : SOLID

CLIENT SAMPLE ID :LAB SAMPLE ID :METHOD REFERENCE :DATE RECEIVED :PRINTED ON :

LAB CONTROL SAMPLEEVLCSL09SV846-8240B

12/22/97 10:40

X MOISTURE :DATE ANALYZED : 12/16/97INSTRUMENT ID : E-HP5972TIME ANALYZED : 11:09


: YZ: £2801 .0: 5 9

[PARAMETER - -• ;v-",-. • : • ••..;•• :-:--.- -.- •'^f^^'.:-i^.^£^^!^y OOMTrTATIC»:Ult!T.:i -ivfJg,::t.:sx.;---RES«j:s:i;-;::: - •:'. ,\-: OMLIF.JERJ1 , 1 -0 i cti t oroetheneBenzeneChtorobenzeneTolueneTrich I oroethene

! 5.0 UG/KG iI 5.0 UG/KG i| 5.0 UG/KG || 5.0 UG/KG j| 5.0 UG/KG |

43 UG/KG |46 UG/KG |43 UG/KG |45 UG/KG |47 UG/KG |

. .•-.:•.•::.:.•::-- '*< :»?+ •-^f.,:^--:, -S-^-'/iiaUAtJTY 'CONTRaCOATA ' '"".* "' ' '• ' '^ -:: iffi^ • • ' ' V • • • - : ' ' " • : • ^ " '-:-

SURSOGATE: CCMPOUNC:; : : .: . :Toluene-dfl1 ,2-Oichloroechane-d4Brotnof I uorobenzene

. -:.:,::. i* '• '.' • '• -• <: ::' ' -i i '>: -"V 'i SPUCE/:' ADDED'? •: I •$ r

| 50.0 UG/KG || 50.0 UG/KG Ij 50.0 UG/KG |

OCaECOVERr UNITS (: JSECCVERT j31 - 117 | 1037 0 - 1 2 1 | 100 |74 - 121 | 106 |

BATCK OIALITY- COflTROt SAWtEv IDs: •• • • • : ; v^- :. i - :'• . . .- .• --• :%,••: :x-:- ..:.;. •••%*•- -+->. ••;. • ':^^'\ •r::.,: '.. •:• •• •QC 3ATCH ID : EV8LKL09 PREP BLANK ID :£V8LXL09

061


LCS/LCSO SUMMARY REPORTPage 1 of

VOtATtLES WGOM&i

CLIENT NAMEPROJECT NAMEPROJECT NUMBER

DATE RECEIVEDPRINTED ON :12/22/97

SAMPLE MATRIX :SOLID

LAB CONTROL SAMPLE

LCS SAMPLE ID :EVLCSL09CLIENT SAMPLE ID :

DATE ANALYZED :12/16/97

INSTRUMENT FILE :E2801.0

METHOD REFERENCE :SU846-324C3

LAB CONTROL SAMPLE 9UPLICAT;

LCSO SAMPLE ID :

CLIENT SAMPLE ID :

DATE ANALYZED :

INSTRUMENT FILE :

1 , 1-OichloroetheneBenzeneChloroBenzeneTolueneTrichloroethene

UG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KGUG/KG

50.050.050.050.050.0

s vatUE1-

ifefcCSg;;:;>»•.•::-'.-.•.- •:-',•:•'.•'•'•'•'•

48.446.247.645.246.3

HiRECOVERY!'

97 |929S9094 |

lifer22! 59- 177 I211 66- 142.21 I 60 • 133 r211 59- 139 j24! 62- 117

* Indicate values outside of QC limitsUPO : 0 out of 0 outside limitsSpike Recover/ : 0 out of 5 outside limits

06?


MULTI-iMEDIA VOLATILE ORGANIC FRACTIONSAMPLE RESULT VERIFICATION

1. Were the sample results reported within the calibration range (YES/NO)? YES

2. Was the percent moisture reported for all soil samples (YES/NO/NA)? YES

3. Was the data reported on a dry weight basis (YES/NO/NA)? YES

4. Did the GC/MS RIC's and TIC's exhibit interferences, off scale peaks or elevatedbaseline (YES/NO)? NO

5. Did the data contain elevated detection limits that could not be verified (YES/NO)?NO

6. Were any computational or transcription errors found (YES/NO)? NO

Specific Comments:

Reviewer ^^^VJ'f&JS /K T Date:_/

063

Site Name:

DATA DBJVERABUES {DQO LeveJ IV or DJINORGANICS - PART I

Client:

Location:______Analytical Fraction: flLfl OA

Lab: POP

Reviewer: "KCL/vuA.OlLpfX Date(s)i . h /qg

B.

C.

D.

E.

F.

G.

H.

J.

Control Chart - results of the method blankspikes run with each batch of samplesprocessed

CLP Form 1s with associated sample resultsand CLP flagging system. All percentmoistures for soils and discussion ofsample type

CLP Form 2s with Initial and continuingcalibration standards (part 1 only)

CLP Form 3s with prep and method blanks

Yes

No

CLP Form 4s with Interference checksampple data

CLP Form 5s with Matrix spike recovery andthe postdigestion spike recovery forICP Metals. Only done if predigestspike recovery exceeds limits

CLP Form 6s with Duplicate data results

CLP Form 7s with LCS data results

:Yes

No

Yesl No

CLP Form 9s with Serial Dilution dataresults

Yes No

fes] No NR

NR

NR

NR

No NR

NR

NR

CLP Form 8s with GFAA standard addition : Yes No (NR)data

: Yes (No) NR

DATA DEUVERABLES (DQO Uvel IV or D)INORGANICS - PART II

K. CLP Form 10s with Instrument Detection : Yes (No) NRData

L. CLP Forms 11 and 12 with Quarterly : Yes (No) NRVerification of Instrument Parameters :

M. CLP Form 13s with Preparation Log data : Yes (No) NR

N. CLP Form 14s with Run Log data : Yes (fiq) NR

065

HEARTLAND. ESI Form A

DATA REQUIREMENTS

A.

B.

C.

D.

E.

F.

Permanently Bound

Paginated

Table of Contents

Digestion Records (Internal C-O-C)

Chain-Of-Custody (external)

Case Narrative

1.

2.

3.

Sample list with Client and LabIDs cross-referenced (copy attached)

All Protocol deviations and QCproblems noted

Comments:

Yes NR

No NR

Yes (No) NR

Yes NR

esJ No NR

Yes (Nol NR

Yes (No) NR

G. Uninitialed Strikeovers

H. Legible Photocopies

I. Consistent Dates

J, Preparation Logs

K. Instrument Run Logs

L. Other Deviations or Comments:

Yes No (NR

(Yes) No NR

No NR

Yes (Nc NR

Yes (No) NR

bfc

HEARTLAND ESI Form B

HOLDING TIMES FOR METALS

1 . Was the holding time exceeded on any of the Metal Fractions

ICP/GFAA/FAA - Holding time of 6 months VTSRMercury - Holding time of 28 days VTSRCyanide - Holding time of 14 days VTSR

Yes

2. If yes, complete the following form for ail samples that exceeding holdingtimes.

Fraction:Sample ID : Matrix : VTSRDecision

: Date of Analysis : DA :QC

Note: DA = The number of days holding time to analysis is exceeded,

S = Non-aqueousA = AqueousX = Air

QA Decision: Results > IDL - J - estimated

Results < IDL - R - rejected

HEARTLAND ESI Form G

PREPARATION BLANK SUMMARY

Sample Matrix: /Soil A Water Air Preparation Blank ID.Units: (mg/kg) ug/1 ug/m3

1. Did the frequency of the preparation blank (fe§ Noanalysis meet method requirements?If no, explain and note action.___________

Analyte : Cone : <CRDL : "Comments/Action

Associated Samples.

CRpt Codes: Yes < CRDUNo > CRDL

HEARTLAND ESI Form 1-1

SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS

Sample Spike Analysis performed on sample U$Lt(0 . Of

Matrix: poii\Units: Vig/kg/% Solids (&'&%' (^

Associated Samples

Waterug/1

3 . 1

QlJ

^ik(0,oOl~ U^/C-Airug/m3

1. Was the sample spike analysis performed at the ^res) Nocorrect frequency?If no, note deviations and action._________

2. Was the sample spike analysis performed on a Pr*es) Nofield sample?If no, reject all associated samples.

®'

reported values tor one analytesIf yes, list analytes_______________________

b. Was sample spike analysis performed using Yes Noboth methods for that analyte?If no, reject affected sample(s) which did not have spikeanalysis performed.______________________

4. Was sample analysis performed at the proper ( » e ^ Noconcentration?If no, list analytes and qualify.__________

5. Did the % recovery for all analytes meet the Yescriteria of 75-125%?If no, list only those analytes which % recovery are out and whose sampleresult (SR) is less than 4 times the sample added (SAJ. rLJs$ %^ Ffcovery inparenthesis next to the an<ly;iAJULcul


6. Were outliers for % recovery flagged with the -Yes (N<T"N" qualifier?If no, list analytes not flagged. «\ ^ L

Q^vA-

7. a. Show calculation for % recovery for one analyte analyzed ,.by 1CP. Lab value [QU 7o

b. Show calculation for % recovery for one analyte analyzed \by furnace AA. Lab value f^U

c. Show calculation for % recovery for Mercury. \Lab value fN.lflk.

d. Show calculation for % recovery for Cyanide.Lab value

070

HEARTLAND ESI Form K-1

DUPUCATE ANALYSIS

Matrix: /SonNUnits: \mg/kg% Solids: KO.a* U^TT

Associated Samoles

£{-»u»(0.OO/ - tOJC-Water Airug/1 ug/m3

QjJ

1. Were duplicate analyses performed at thecorrect frequency?If no, note deviations and action.

2. Was duplicate analysis performed on a field fYes) Nosample?If no, reject ail associated samples.

3. Were two analytical methods used to obtain Yesreported values for one analyte?If yes,a. List analytes_____________;________________

b. Were duplicate analysis performed using both Yes Nomethods for that analyte?If no, reject affected samples which did not have

duplicate analysis performed.______________

4. Is the laboratory using the correct control limit f Yes No(i.e. -f-CRDL or 20% for water and J_CRDL or 35% for soTTs*criteria)to judge duplicate RPD results?If no, note deviations._______________________———————————————————————-——————— 071*


5. Do ail anaiytes meet these QC control limits? (Yes NoIf no, list the analytes outside the fimits and qualify these tanalytes *- uJjuL/U C jJUJ o-oT log, (2jfrLc^JuC- - . - — —

6. Were outliers correctly flagged with the "*"qualifier? ,If no, list those anaiytes not correctly flagged. r\ \CX

Yes No

,JO

7. a. Show calculation for RPD for one analyte analyzed by ICP.

Show calculation for RPD for one analyte analyzed by \furnace AA. Lab value t\ vC

c. Show calculation for RPD for Mercury.Lab

d. Shov/ calculation for RPD for Cyanide.Lab value

Nn.ti 7,

072

HEARTLAND ESJ Form L

LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE

Matrix: /Soil A Water AirUnits: I mg/kgy ug/I ugm3

Associated Samples. GAL1. Was the laboratory control sample performed fYesj No

at the correct frequency?If no, give action.__________________

2. Do all anaiytes meet the QC limits of 80-120% (PesJ No(except Silver, Antimony, Mercury and Cyanidefor aqueous samples) or within the control limitsestablished by EPA for soils?If no, list anaiytes, their recovery and action.__

3. a. Show the calculation for % recovery for at least one analyte

Lab valueby ICP. r-

(Jl-

b. Show the calculation for % recovery for at least one analyteanalyzed by furnace AA. ,

Lab value f\ ICV

c. Show the claculation for % recover/ of Mercury (soil only).Lab value r\

073

HEARTLAND ESI Form N

SAMPLE RESULT VER1RCAT10N

Associated Samples

Were ail samples reported within the calibration C^65) No

range?If no, list affected samples and action.__________

2. Was the % solids analysis performed for all Yes (Nononaqueous samples? .If no, list affected samples and action.____

3. Show calculation for % solids for one sample. ILab value if\uX

4. Was the raw data free of any anomalies? i Yes NoIf no, list affected samples and action. ____ f\ l(X

5, Was the data package free of any computational Yes Noor transcriptional errors? .If no, list affected samples and action.____rvlCX_____________

6. Verify that nonaqueous samples were reported on a dry weightbasis by recalculating the results for one anaiyte in asample. Lab value

DATA D6UVERABLES (DQO Levei IV or DJINORGANICS - PART t

Site Name: f\A fi " Client:

Location: ______Analytical FfactioniPff

Reviewer: "K

Lab: POP

Datefsi: I

a.

D.

E.

F.

G.

H.

Control Chart - results of the method blankspikes run with each batch of samplesprocessed

CLP Form 1s with associated sample resultsand CLP flagging system. AH percentmoistures for soils and discussion ofsample type

CLP Form 2s with Initial and continuingcalibration standards (part 1 only)

CLP Form 3s with prep and method bla

CLP Form 4s with Interference checksampple data

CLP Form 5s with Matrix spike recovery andthe postdigestion spike recovery forICP Metals. Only done if predigestspike recovery exceeds limits

CLP Form 6s with Duplicate data results

CLP Form 7s with LCS data results

Yes No

No NR

Yes

es1 No

Yes (No

No

No

CLP Form 8s with GFAA standard addition Yes Nodata

J. CLP Form 9s with Serial Dilution dataresults

NR

NR

NR

'es) No NR

NR

NR

Yes (No) NR

075

DATA DEUVERABLES (DQO Level IV or D)INORGANICS - PART II

K. CLP Form 10s with Instrument Detection : Yes (No) NRData

L. CLP Forms 11 and 12 with Quarterly : Yes (jo) NRVerification of Instrument Parameters :

M. CLP Form 13s with Preparation Log data : Yes ( 9) NR

N. CLP Form 14s with Run Log data : Yes (kT) NR

07'

HEARTLAND ESI Form A

DATA REQUIREMENTS

A.

B.

C.

D. .

E.

F.

Permanently Bound

Paginated

Table of Contents

Digestion Records (internal C-O-C)

Chain-Of-Custody (external)

Case Narrative

1 . Sample list with Client and Lab

Yes

&

Yes

Yes

©

Yes

©No

©

©

No

(NO\

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

2.

3.

IDs cross-referenced (copy attached)

All Protocol deviations and QCproblems noted

Comments:

Yes NR

G. Uninitialed Strikeovers

H. Legible Photocopies

I. Consistent Dates

J. Preparation Logs

K. Instrument Run Logs

L. Other Deviations or Comments:

Yes No

Yes

Yes

No NR

No NR

NR

NR

077

HEARTLAND ESI Form B

HOLDING TIMES FOR METALS

1. Was the holding time exceeded on any of the Metai Fractions

ICP/GFAA/FAA - Holding time of 6 months VTSHMercury - Holding time of 28 days VTSHCyanide - Holding time of 14 days VTSR

No

2. If yes, complete the following form for all samples that exceeding holdingtimes.

Fraction: OSample ID : Matrix : VTSRDecision

: Date of Analysis : DA :QC

<SLii

Note: DA = The number of days holding time to analysis is exceeded,

S = Non-aqueousA = AqueousX = Air

QA Decision: Results > IDL - J - estimated

• Results < IDL - R - rejected 078

HEARTLAND ESI Form G

PREPARATION BLANK SUMMARY

Sample Matrix: Soil Wate Air Preparation Blank IDUnits: mg/kg ( wg/1 J ug/m3

1. Did the frequency of the preparation blank (Yes) Noanalysis meet method requirements?If no, explain and note action.___________

Analyte : Cone : <CRDL : Comments/Action

Associated Samples.

CRDL Codes: Yes < CRDLNo > CRDL


SAMPLE SPIKE ANALYSIS

Sample Spike Analysis performed on sample M^ltf ( t fiCXb " C/i *<• fcilX/~*-^

Matrix: Soil /Waters AirUnits:% Solids

rvC7 -Units: mg/kg ug/m3 ' 0(n

Associated Samples,

2. Was the sample spike analysis performed on afield sample?If no, reject all associated samples.

3. a. Were two analytical methods used to obtain Yesreported values for one anaivte?If yes, list analytes_________________

1. Was the sample spike analysis performed at the ^es) Nocorrect frequency?If no, note deviations and action._________

b. Was sample spike analysis performed using Yes Noboth methods for that analyte?If no, reject affected sample(s) which did not have spikeanalysis performed._____________________

4. Was sample analysis performed at the proper (Ye^ Noconcentration?If no, list analytes and qualify.__________

5. Did the % recovery for all analytes meet the /Ye^ Nocriteria of 75-125%? ^~^If no, list only those analytes which % recovery are out and whose sampleresult (SR) is less than 4- times the sample added (SA). .List % recovery in QQQparenthesis next to the analyte out and action,___._____________

HEARTLAND ESI Form 1-2 -

6. Were outliers for % recovery flagged with the Yes No"N" qualifier? •If no, list analytes not flagged._____TMQ._____________

7. a. Show calculation for % recovery for one analyte analyzedby ICP. (\ Lab value

CX2>0-O.Ol

b. Show calculation for % recovery for one analyte analyzedby furnace AA. Lab value

c. Show calculation for % recovery for Mercury.Lab value

d. Show calculation for % recovery for Cyanide.Lab value

081


^ DUPLICATE ANALYSIS

Duplicate Analysis performed on sample U3aLfl I. DOo •* f ft V

Matrix: Soil /Waxen Air i /x / * l t\rnUnits: mg/kg W^ ug/m3 ^l. OCT7 -% Solids:

Associated Samples. Out/

1. Were duplicate analyses performed at the (Ve^ Nocorrect frequency?If no, note deviations and action.____________________

2. Was duplicate analysis performed on a field (Ye^ Nosample?If no, reject all associated samples.

3. Were two analytical methods used to obtain Yes (No)reported values for one analyte?If yes,a. List analytes_____________;_______________

b. Were duplicate analysis performed using both Yes Nomethods for that analyte?If no, reject affected samples which did not have

duplicate analysis performed.______________

4. Is the laboratory using the correct control limit (Ye^ No(i.e. 4-CRDL or 20% for water and _±.CRDL or 35% for soiis^criteria}to judge duplicate RPO results?If no, note deviations._______________________ ..

082


5. Do all analytes meet these QC control limits? fYe^ Noif no, list the anarytes outside the limits and qualify theseanalytes.__________;________________

6. Were outliers correctly flagged with the '*" Yes Noqualifier?If no, list those analytes not correctly flagged.___£

7. a. Show calculation for RPD for one analyte analyzed by ICP. .G?_ n^ „<• Ubva.ueJ^O?,

b. Show calculation for RPD for one analyte analyzed byfurnace AA. Ub

c. Show calculation for RPD for Mercury.Lab value

d. Show calculation for RPD for Cyanide.Lab value

083

HEARTLAND ESI Form L

LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE

Matrix: Soil /Water)Units: mg/kg Ut/g/1 ) .

Associated Samples 6tUr

Airugm3

1. Was the laborartory control sample performed (Yef Noat the correct frequency?If no, give action.__________________

2. Do all analytes meet the QC limits of 80-120% fres) No(except Silver, Antimony, Mercury and Cyanidefor aqueous samples) or within the control limitsestablished by EPA for soils?If no, list analytes, their recovery and action._________

3. a. Show the calculation for % recovery for at least one analytebylc?- (VU(- Si Lab value

b. Show the calculation for % recovery for at least one analyteanalyzed by furnace AA. \

Lab value r\lQ

c. Show the claculation for % recovery of Mercury (soil only)..Lab value fvl Q.

HEARTLAND ESI Form N

SAMPLE RESULT VERIFICATION

Associated Samples______CU-*____________________

1. Were ail samples reported within the calibration (Ye^ Norange?If no, list affected samples and action.__________

2. Was the % solids analysis performed for all Yes Nononaqueous samples? . ,If no, list affected samples and action.____rvJQi______________

3, Show calculation for % solids for one sample.Lab value

4. Was the raw data free of any anomalies? i Yes NoIf no, list affected samples and action.____f

5, Was the data package free of any computational Yes Noor transcripu'onal errors? jIf no, list affected samples and action. f\.[Q_______________

6. Verify that nonaqueous samples were reported on a dry weightbasis by recalculating the results for one analyts in a Isample. Lab value N{^

685

Remedial Design, Data Validation Report

Documents

Transcript of Remedial Design, Data Validation Report