Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent … · 2020. 2. 27. · 2/27/2020 2 REDUCE-IT...
Transcript of Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent … · 2020. 2. 27. · 2/27/2020 2 REDUCE-IT...
2/27/2020
1
Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl–Intervention Trial
Deepak L. Bhatt, MD, MPH, Michael Miller, MD, Eliot A. Brinton, MD,
Terry A. Jacobson, MD, Ph. Gabriel Steg, MD, Steven B. Ketchum, PhD,
Ralph T. Doyle, Jr., BA, Rebecca A. Juliano, PhD, Lixia Jiao, PhD,
Craig Granowitz, MD, PhD, Jean-Claude Tardif, MD, Brian Olshansky, MD,
Mina K. Chung, MD, C. Michael Gibson, MS, MD, Robert P. Giugliano, MD, SM,
Matthew J. Budoff, MD, Christie M. Ballantyne, MD,
on Behalf of the REDUCE-IT Investigators
Dr. Deepak L. Bhatt discloses the following relationships - Advisory Board: Cardax, Cereno, Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology, Medscape Cardiology, PhaseBio, Regado Biosciences; Board of Directors: Boston VA Research Institute, Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care, TobeSoft; Chair: American Heart Association Quality Oversight Committee; Data Monitoring Committees: Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute, for the PORTICO trial, funded by St. Jude Medical, now Abbott), Cleveland Clinic (including for the ExCEED trial, funded by Edwards), Duke Clinical Research Institute, Mayo Clinic, Mount Sinai School of Medicine (for the ENVISAGE trial, funded by Daiichi Sankyo), Population Health Research Institute; Honoraria: American College of Cardiology (Senior Associate Editor, Clinical Trials and News, ACC.org; Vice-Chair, ACC Accreditation Committee), Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute; RE-DUAL PCI clinical trial steering committee funded by Boehringer Ingelheim), Belvoir Publications (Editor in Chief, Harvard Heart Letter), Duke Clinical Research Institute (clinical trial steering committees), HMP Global (Editor in Chief, Journal of Invasive Cardiology), Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Guest Editor; Associate Editor), Medtelligence/ReachMD (CME steering committees), Population Health Research Institute (for the COMPASS operations committee, publications committee, steering committee, and USA national co-leader, funded by Bayer), Slack Publications (Chief Medical Editor, Cardiology Today’s Intervention), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care (Secretary/Treasurer), WebMD (CME steering committees); Other: Clinical Cardiology (Deputy Editor), NCDR-ACTION Registry Steering Committee (Chair), VA CART Research and Publications Committee (Chair); Research Funding: Abbott, Afimmune, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Eisai, Ethicon, Forest Laboratories, Fractyl, Idorsia, Ironwood, Ischemix, Lilly, Medtronic, PhaseBio, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi Aventis, Synaptic, The Medicines Company; Royalties: Elsevier (Editor, Cardiovascular Intervention: A Companion to Braunwald’s Heart Disease); Site Co-Investigator: Biotronik, Boston Scientific, CSI, St. Jude Medical (now Abbott), Svelte; Trustee: American College of Cardiology; Unfunded Research: FlowCo, Merck, Novo Nordisk, PLx Pharma, Takeda.
This presentation includes off-label and/or investigational uses of drugs.
REDUCE-IT was sponsored by Amarin Pharma, Inc.
All analyses independently validated by Baim Clinical Research Institute.
Disclosures
1
2
2/27/2020
2
REDUCE-IT Design
Adapted with permissionǂ from Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Brinton EA, et al; on behalf of the REDUCE-IT Investigators. Rationale and design of REDUCE-IT: Reduction of Cardiovascular Events with Icosapent Ethyl–Intervention Trial. Clin Cardiol. 2017;40:138-148. REDUCE-IT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01492361. [ǂhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/]
Screening Period Double-Blind Treatment/Follow-up Period
1:1Randomization
with continuation of stable statin
therapy(N=8179)
Key Inclusion Criteria
• Statin-treated menand women ≥45 yrs
• Established CVD (~70% of patients) or DM + ≥1 risk factor
• TG ≥150 mg/dL and<500 mg/dL*
• LDL-C >40 mg/dLand ≤100 mg/dL
Icosapent Ethyl4 g/day
(n=4089)
Placebo(n=4090)
Baseline
-1 Month
1
Screening
Every 12 months12
End of Study
Year
Months
Visit
Lab values
0
Primary Endpoint
Time fromrandomization to the
first occurrence of composite of CV death,
nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, coronary
revascularization, unstable angina
requiring hospitalization
4 months,12 months,
annually
Lead-in
• Statin stabilization
• Medication washout
• Lipidqualification
Up to 6.2 years†
Randomization
End-of-study follow-up
visit
4 months,12 months,
annually
End-of-study follow-up
visit
40
7 Final Visit8 962 3 54
*Due to the variability of triglycerides, a 10% allowance existed in the initial protocol, which permitted patients to be enrolled with qualifying triglycerides ≥135 mg/dL. Protocol amendment 1 (May 2013) changed the lower limit of acceptable triglycerides from 150 mg/dL to 200 mg/dL, with no variability allowance.
†Median trial follow-up duration was 4.9 years (minimum 0.0, maximum 6.2 years).
Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Miller M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019. Bhatt DL. AHA 2018, Chicago.
Primary Composite Endpoint:CV Death, MI, Stroke, Coronary Revasc, Unstable Angina
Key Secondary Composite Endpoint:CV Death, MI, Stroke
Primary and Key Secondary Composite Endpoints
Icosapent Ethyl
23.0%
Placebo
28.3%
Years since Randomization
Pa
tie
nts
wit
h a
n E
ven
t (%
)
0 1 2 3 4 50
10
20
30
P = 0.00000001
RRR = 24.8%ARR = 4.8%NNT = 21 (95% CI, 15–33)
Hazard Ratio, 0.75(95% CI, 0.68–0.83)
20.0%
16.2%
Icosapent Ethyl
Placebo
Hazard Ratio, 0.74(95% CI, 0.65–0.83)
RRR = 26.5%ARR = 3.6%NNT = 28 (95% CI, 20–47)
P = 0.0000006
Years since Randomization
Pa
tie
nts
wit
h a
n E
ven
t (%
)
0 1 2 3 4 50
10
20
30
3
4
2/27/2020
3
176
184
1,724
901
463
Nu
mb
er
of
Pri
mar
y C
om
po
sit
e E
nd
po
int
Eve
nts
Full Dataset Event No. 3rd1st 2nd ≥4
-196
1,185
85
705
299 -164
-99
1,500
2,000
1,000
Placebo [N=4090]
500
0Icosapent Ethyl
[N=4089]
2nd EventsHR 0.68
(95% CI, 0.60-0.77)
1st EventsHR 0.75
(95% CI, 0.68-0.83) P=0.00000001
≥4 EventsRR 0.46
(95% CI, 0.36-0.60)
3rd EventsHR 0.70
(95% CI, 0.59-0.83)96 -80
RR 0.69(95% CI, 0.61-0.77)
P=0.0000000004No. ofFewerCases
31% Reduction in Total Events
-539
Bhatt DL, Steg PG, Miller M, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:2791-2802. Bhatt DL. ACC 2019, New Orleans.
First and Subsequent Events – Full Data
Note: WLW method for the 1st events, 2nd
events, and 3rd events categories;Negative binomial model for ≥4th events and overall treatment comparison.
5
6
2/27/2020
4
Early Discontinuation from Study N=267 (17.2%)†
Withdrawal of consent 184 (11.9%)Investigator judgement 9 (0.6%)Incomplete final visit 48 (3.1%)Other 26 (1.7%)
Early Discontinuation from Study N=321 (20.1%)†
Withdrawal of consent 209 (13.1%)Investigator judgement 9 (0.6%)Incomplete final visit 70 (4.4%)Other 33 (2.1%)
Actual vs. potential follow-up time (%) 88.7% Known vital status 1546 (99.9%)
Completed Study N=1281 (82.8%)
Completed final visit 1176 (76.0%)Death before final visit 105 (6.8%)
Completed Study N=1277 (79.9%)Completed final visit 1130 (70.7%)Death before final visit 147 (9.2%)
Actual vs. potential follow-up time (%) 87.1% Known vital status 1596 (99.9%)
RandomizedN=3146
(45% of Screened)
Screen Fails N=3816*
Incl./Excl. criteria not met 3541Withdrawal of consent 164Adverse event 8Primary prevention category closed 4 Death 2Lost to follow-up 44Enrollment closed 3Other 53
ScreenedN=6962
Icosapent EthylN=1548 (100%)
PlaceboN=1598 (100%)
*3 patients presented 2 screen failure reasons.
†Early discontinuation from study (17.2% icosapent ethyl; 20.1% placebo) includes patients who discontinued after having a primary event (15 [1.0%] icosapent ethyl; 34 [2.1%] placebo) and prior to having an event (252 [16.3%] icosapent ethyl; 287 [18.0%] placebo).
CONSORT Diagram: USA Subgroup
Bhatt DL, Miller M, Brinton EA, et al. Circulation. 2019. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044440.
32.1%*
22.9%*
Icosapent Ethyl
Placebo
Years since Randomization
Pa
tie
nts
wit
h a
n E
ven
t (%
)
0
10
20
40
30
P = 0.000001
RRR = 31%ARR = 6.5%NNT = 15 (95% CI, 11–27)
Hazard Ratio, 0.69(95% CI, 0.59–0.80)
1 2 3 4 5
Primary End Point: USA Subgroup CV Death, MI, Stroke, Coronary Revasc, Unstable Angina
0
*Estimated Kaplan-Meier event rate at approximately 5.7 years. The curves were visually truncated at 5.7 yearsbecause a limited number of events occurred beyond that time point; all patient data were included in the analyses. Bhatt DL, Miller M, Brinton EA, et al. Circulation. 2019. Bhatt DL. AHA 2019, Philadelphia.
7
8
2/27/2020
5
22.6%*
16.0%*
Icosapent Ethyl
Placebo
Years since Randomization
Pa
tie
nts
wit
h a
n E
ven
t (%
)
0 1 2 3 4 50
10
20
30
P = 0.00008
RRR = 31%ARR = 4.6%NNT = 22 (95% CI, 14–47)
Hazard Ratio, 0.69(95% CI, 0.57–0.83)
Key Secondary End Point: USA Subgroup CV Death, MI, Stroke
*Estimated Kaplan-Meier event rate at approximately 5.7 years. The curves were visually truncated at 5.7 yearsbecause a limited number of events occurred beyond that time point; all patient data were included in the analyses. Bhatt DL, Miller M, Brinton EA, et al. Circulation. 2019. Bhatt DL. AHA 2019, Philadelphia.
Years since Randomization
1 52 3 4
4
6
10
18
14
16
12
8P = 0.004Pinteraction = 0.02
RRR = 30%ARR = 2.6%NNT = 39 (95% CI, 22–154)
Hazard Ratio, 0.70(95% CI, 0.55–0.90)
All-Cause Mortality: USA Subgroup
All
-Cau
se M
ort
alit
y R
ate
(%
)
0
2
0
13.9%*
11.1%*
Icosapent Ethyl
Placebo
*Estimated Kaplan-Meier event rate at approximately 5.7 years. The curves were visually truncated at 5.7 yearsbecause a limited number of events occurred beyond that time point; all patient data were included in the analyses. Bhatt DL, Miller M, Brinton EA, et al. Circulation. 2019. Bhatt DL. AHA 2019, Philadelphia.
9
10
2/27/2020
6
P-valueHR (95% CI)Placebo n/N (%)
Icosapent Ethyl n/N (%)
0.0000010.69 (0.59–0.80)394/1598 (24.7%)281/1548 (18.2%)Primary Composite (ITT)
0.000080.69 (0.57–0.83)266/1598 (16.6%)187/1548 (12.1%)Key Secondary Composite (ITT)
0.00070.71 (0.58–0.86)222/1598 (13.9%)160/1548 (10.3%)Cardiovascular Death or Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction
0.010.72 (0.56–0.93)141/1598 (8.8%)103/1548 (6.7%)Fatal or Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction
0.00060.64 (0.49–0.83)144/1598 (9.0%)94/1548 (6.1%)Urgent or Emergency Revascularization
0.0070.66 (0.49–0.90)107/1598 (6.7%)72/1548 (4.7%)Cardiovascular Death
0.0020.53 (0.36–0.79)71/1598 (4.4%)38/1548 (2.5%)Hospitalization for Unstable Angina
0.020.63 (0.43–0.93)65/1598 (4.1%)41/1548 (2.6%)Fatal or Nonfatal Stroke
0.00005 0.70 (0.59–0.83)309/1598 (19.3%)221/1548 (14.3%)Total Mortality/Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction/Nonfatal Stroke
0.0040.70 (0.55–0.90)156/1598 (9.8%)111/1548 (7.2%)Total Mortality
EndpointHazard Ratio
(95% CI)
Placebo Better
Icosapent EthylBetter
0.2 0.6 1.0 1.41.20.4 0.8
31%
RRR
31%
29%
28%
36%
34%
47%
37%
30%
30%
Prespecified Hierarchical Testing:USA Subgroup
RRR denotes relative risk reductionBhatt DL, Miller M, Brinton EA, et al. Circulation. 2019. Bhatt DL. AHA 2019, Philadelphia.
Primary Composite (ITT)
Risk CategorySecondary PreventionPrimary Prevention
Ezetimibe UseNoYes
Age Group<65 Years≥65 Years
SexMaleFemale
White vs Non-WhiteWhiteNon-White
Baseline DiabetesDiabetesNo Diabetes
Baseline Statin IntensityHighModerateLow
TG ≥200 mg/dL vs <200 mg/dL TG ≥200 mg/dLTG <200 mg/dL
TG ≥150 mg/dL vs <150 mg/dLTG ≥150 mg/dLTG <150 mg/dL
TG ≥200 and HDL-C ≤35YesNo
hsCRP ≤2 vs >2 mg/L≤2 mg/L>2 mg/L
hsCRP ≤3 vs >3 mg/L≤3 mg/L>3 mg/L
Baseline eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2
60 - <90 mL/min/1.73m2
≥90 mL/min/1.73m2
LDL-C (Derived) by Tertiles≥12 - ≤ 65 mg/dL>65 - ≤80 mg/dL>80 - ≤222 mg/dL
HDL-C by Tertiles≥19 - ≤36 mg/dL>36 - ≤43.5 mg/dL>43.5 - ≤96.5 mg/dL
ApoB by Tertiles≥17.5 - ≤76 mg/dL>76 - ≤89 mg/dL>89 - ≤196 mg/dL
Non-HDL by Tertiles≥68 - ≤107.5 mg/dL>107.5 - ≤125 mg/dL>125 - ≤244 mg/dL
Triglycerides by Tertiles≥97 - ≤191 mg/dL>191 - ≤250 mg/dL>250 - ≤822.25 mg/dL
0.13
0.55
0.67
0.69
0.45
0.77
0.28
0.89
0.82
0.53
0.86
0.39
0.19
0.09
0.43
0.98
0.49
0.97
Int pVal
0.70 (0.59–0.83)0.65 (0.47–0.91)
0.69 (0.59–0.80)
0.64 (0.54–0.77)0.84 (0.62–1.13)
0.68 (0.58–0.80)0.82 (0.45–1.48)
0.66 (0.52–0.84)0.71 (0.58–0.87)
0.70 (0.60–0.82)0.56 (0.31–1.01)
0.69 (0.58–0.83)0.66 (0.50–0.88)
0.67 (0.53–0.86)0.65 (0.52–0.80)1.08 (0.59–1.96)
0.68 (0.56–0.83)0.70 (0.55–0.90)
0.68 (0.58–0.80)0.71 (0.44–1.14)
0.63 (0.46–0.85)0.70 (0.59–0.84)
0.70 (0.55–0.89)0.68 (0.55–0.83)
0.73 (0.60–0.90)0.63 (0.50–0.80)
0.57 (0.44–0.75)0.71 (0.58–0.89)0.85 (0.59–1.24)
0.59 (0.45–0.77)0.87 (0.67–1.13)0.63 (0.48–0.83)
0.60 (0.47–0.77)0.75 (0.57–0.98)0.75 (0.56–1.00)
0.68 (0.52–0.88)0.69 (0.53–0.90)0.70 (0.54–0.92)
0.63 (0.47–0.83)0.66 (0.51–0.85)0.79 (0.61–1.03)
0.70 (0.54–0.91)0.69 (0.53–0.90)0.67 (0.51–0.87)
HR (95%CI)
394/1598 (24.7%)
300/942 (31.8%)94/656 (14.3%)
368/1490 (24.7%)26/108 (24.1%)
162/732 (22.1%)232/866 (26.8%)
302/1070 (28.2%)92/528 (17.4%)
362/1474 (24.6%)32/124 (25.8%)
270/1115 (24.2%)124/483 (25.7%)
153/511 (29.9%)220/923 (23.8%)20/153 (13.1%)
247/979 (25.2%)147/618 (23.8%)
349/1425 (24.5%)45/172 (26.2%)
102/349 (29.2%)292/1246 (23.4%)
162/691 (23.4%)232/906 (25.6%)
215/931 (23.1%)179/666 (26.9%)
137/426 (32.2%)197/844 (23.3%)60/326 (18.4%)
132/542 (24.4%)128/520 (24.6%)134/535 (25.0%)
154/527 (29.2%)126/539 (23.4%)110/522 (21.1%)
131/555 (23.6%)128/502 (25.5%)134/530 (25.3%)
119/520 (22.9%)150/541 (27.7%)125/536 (23.3%)
131/539 24.3%)126/519 (24.3%)137/539 (25.4%)
Placebo
n/N(%)
281/1548 (18.2%)
201/908 (22.1%)80/640 (12.5%)
262/1454 (18.0%)19/94 (20.2%)
116/740 (15.7%)165/808 (20.4%)
221/1061 (20.8%)60/487 (12.3%)
264/1437 (18.4%)17/111 (15.3%)
196/1090 (18.0%)85/458 (18.6%)
111/518 (21.4%)146/871 (16.8%)23/152 (15.1%)
174/945 (18.4%)107/600 (17.8%)
252/1384 (18.2%)29/161 (18.0%)
70/351 (19.9%)209/1189 (17.6%)
117/654 (17.9%)164/891 (18.4%)
159/883 (18.0%)122/662 (18.4%)
84/414 (20.3%)143/810 (17.7%)54/321 (16.8%)
86/557 (15.4%)106/489 (21.7%)89/499 (17.8%)
104/540 (19.3%)95/528 (18.0%)79/468 (16.9%)
95/561 (16.9%)93/499 (18.6%)90/477 (18.9%)
84/536 (15.7%)97/507 (19.1%)
100/502 (19.9%)
93/517 (18.0%)96/525 (18.3%)92/503 (18.3%)
IcosapentEthyl
n/N (%)
Endpoint/Subgroup Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Placebo Better
IcosapentEthylBetter
0.2 0.60.4 0.8 1.0 1.41.2 1.81.6
Primary Endpoint: USA SubgroupCV Death, MI, Stroke, Coronary Revasc, Unstable Angina
Bhatt DL, Miller M, Brinton EA, et al. Circulation. 2019. Bhatt DL. AHA 2019, Philadelphia.
11
12
2/27/2020
7
Primary Endpoint: Subgroups – USACV Death, MI, Stroke, Coronary Revasc, Unstable Angina
Primary Composite (ITT)
Risk CategorySecondary PreventionPrimary Prevention
Ezetimibe UseNoYes
Age Group<65 Years≥65 Years
SexMaleFemale
White vs Non-WhiteWhiteNon-White
Baseline DiabetesDiabetesNo Diabetes
Baseline Statin IntensityHighModerateLow
TG ≥200 mg/dL vs <200 mg/dL TG ≥200 mg/dLTG <200 mg/dL
TG ≥150 mg/dL vs <150 mg/dLTG ≥150 mg/dLTG <150 mg/dL
TG ≥200 and HDL-C ≤35YesNo
hsCRP ≤2 vs >2 mg/L≤2 mg/L>2 mg/L
hsCRP ≤3 vs >3 mg/L≤3 mg/L>3 mg/L
Baseline eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2
60 - <90 mL/min/1.73m2
≥90 mL/min/1.73m2
LDL-C (Derived) by Tertiles≥12 - ≤ 65 mg/dL>65 - ≤80 mg/dL>80 - ≤222 mg/dL
HDL-C by Tertiles≥19 - ≤36 mg/dL>36 - ≤43.5 mg/dL>43.5 - ≤96.5 mg/dL
ApoB by Tertiles≥17.5 - ≤76 mg/dL>76 - ≤89 mg/dL>89 - ≤196 mg/dL
Non-HDL by Tertiles≥68 - ≤107.5 mg/dL>107.5 - ≤125 mg/dL>125 - ≤244 mg/dL
Triglycerides by Tertiles≥97 - ≤191 mg/dL>191 - ≤250 mg/dL>250 - ≤822.25 mg/dL
0.13
0.55
0.67
0.69
0.45
0.77
0.28
0.89
0.82
0.53
0.86
0.39
0.19
0.09
0.43
0.98
0.49
0.97
Int pVal
0.70 (0.59–0.83)0.65 (0.47–0.91)
0.69 (0.59–0.80)
0.64 (0.54–0.77)0.84 (0.62–1.13)
0.68 (0.58–0.80)0.82 (0.45–1.48)
0.66 (0.52–0.84)0.71 (0.58–0.87)
0.70 (0.60–0.82)0.56 (0.31–1.01)
0.69 (0.58–0.83)0.66 (0.50–0.88)
0.67 (0.53–0.86)0.65 (0.52–0.80)1.08 (0.59–1.96)
0.68 (0.56–0.83)0.70 (0.55–0.90)
0.68 (0.58–0.80)0.71 (0.44–1.14)
0.63 (0.46–0.85)0.70 (0.59–0.84)
0.70 (0.55–0.89)0.68 (0.55–0.83)
0.73 (0.60–0.90)0.63 (0.50–0.80)
0.57 (0.44–0.75)0.71 (0.58–0.89)0.85 (0.59–1.24)
0.59 (0.45–0.77)0.87 (0.67–1.13)0.63 (0.48–0.83)
0.60 (0.47–0.77)0.75 (0.57–0.98)0.75 (0.56–1.00)
0.68 (0.52–0.88)0.69 (0.53–0.90)0.70 (0.54–0.92)
0.63 (0.47–0.83)0.66 (0.51–0.85)0.79 (0.61–1.03)
0.70 (0.54–0.91)0.69 (0.53–0.90)0.67 (0.51–0.87)
HR (95%CI)
394/1598 (24.7%)
300/942 (31.8%)94/656 (14.3%)
368/1490 (24.7%)26/108 (24.1%)
162/732 (22.1%)232/866 (26.8%)
302/1070 (28.2%)92/528 (17.4%)
362/1474 (24.6%)32/124 (25.8%)
270/1115 (24.2%)124/483 (25.7%)
153/511 (29.9%)220/923 (23.8%)20/153 (13.1%)
247/979 (25.2%)147/618 (23.8%)
349/1425 (24.5%)45/172 (26.2%)
102/349 (29.2%)292/1246 (23.4%)
162/691 (23.4%)232/906 (25.6%)
215/931 (23.1%)179/666 (26.9%)
137/426 (32.2%)197/844 (23.3%)60/326 (18.4%)
132/542 (24.4%)128/520 (24.6%)134/535 (25.0%)
154/527 (29.2%)126/539 (23.4%)110/522 (21.1%)
131/555 (23.6%)128/502 (25.5%)134/530 (25.3%)
119/520 (22.9%)150/541 (27.7%)125/536 (23.3%)
131/539 24.3%)126/519 (24.3%)137/539 (25.4%)
Placebo
n/N(%)
281/1548 (18.2%)
201/908 (22.1%)80/640 (12.5%)
262/1454 (18.0%)19/94 (20.2%)
116/740 (15.7%)165/808 (20.4%)
221/1061 (20.8%)60/487 (12.3%)
264/1437 (18.4%)17/111 (15.3%)
196/1090 (18.0%)85/458 (18.6%)
111/518 (21.4%)146/871 (16.8%)23/152 (15.1%)
174/945 (18.4%)107/600 (17.8%)
252/1384 (18.2%)29/161 (18.0%)
70/351 (19.9%)209/1189 (17.6%)
117/654 (17.9%)164/891 (18.4%)
159/883 (18.0%)122/662 (18.4%)
84/414 (20.3%)143/810 (17.7%)54/321 (16.8%)
86/557 (15.4%)106/489 (21.7%)89/499 (17.8%)
104/540 (19.3%)95/528 (18.0%)79/468 (16.9%)
95/561 (16.9%)93/499 (18.6%)90/477 (18.9%)
84/536 (15.7%)97/507 (19.1%)
100/502 (19.9%)
93/517 (18.0%)96/525 (18.3%)92/503 (18.3%)
IcosapentEthyl
n/N (%)
Endpoint/Subgroup Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Placebo Better
IcosapentEthylBetter
0.2 0.60.4 0.8 1.0 1.41.2 1.81.6
Risk CategorySecondary PreventionPrimary Prevention
0.13201/908 (22.1%)80/640 (12.5%)
0.64 (0.54–0.77)0.84 (0.62–1.13)
300/942 (31.8%)94/656 (14.3%)
Subgroup HR (95% CI) IntP Val
Placebon/N (%)
Icosapent Ethyln/N (%)
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
Bhatt DL, Miller M, Brinton EA, et al. Circulation. 2019. Bhatt DL. AHA 2019, Philadelphia.
Primary Composite (ITT)
Risk CategorySecondary PreventionPrimary Prevention
Ezetimibe UseNoYes
Age Group<65 Years≥65 Years
SexMaleFemale
White vs Non-WhiteWhiteNon-White
Baseline DiabetesDiabetesNo Diabetes
Baseline Statin IntensityHighModerateLow
TG ≥200 mg/dL vs <200 mg/dL TG ≥200 mg/dLTG <200 mg/dL
TG ≥150 mg/dL vs <150 mg/dLTG ≥150 mg/dLTG <150 mg/dL
TG ≥200 and HDL-C ≤35YesNo
hsCRP ≤2 vs >2 mg/L≤2 mg/L>2 mg/L
hsCRP ≤3 vs >3 mg/L≤3 mg/L>3 mg/L
Baseline eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2
60 - <90 mL/min/1.73m2
≥90 mL/min/1.73m2
LDL-C (Derived) by Tertiles≥12 - ≤ 65 mg/dL>65 - ≤80 mg/dL>80 - ≤222 mg/dL
HDL-C by Tertiles≥19 - ≤36 mg/dL>36 - ≤43.5 mg/dL>43.5 - ≤96.5 mg/dL
ApoB by Tertiles≥17.5 - ≤76 mg/dL>76 - ≤89 mg/dL>89 - ≤196 mg/dL
Non-HDL by Tertiles≥68 - ≤107.5 mg/dL>107.5 - ≤125 mg/dL>125 - ≤244 mg/dL
Triglycerides by Tertiles≥97 - ≤191 mg/dL>191 - ≤250 mg/dL>250 - ≤822.25 mg/dL
0.13
0.55
0.67
0.69
0.45
0.77
0.28
0.89
0.82
0.53
0.86
0.39
0.19
0.09
0.43
0.98
0.49
0.97
Int pVal
0.70 (0.59–0.83)0.65 (0.47–0.91)
0.69 (0.59–0.80)
0.64 (0.54–0.77)0.84 (0.62–1.13)
0.68 (0.58–0.80)0.82 (0.45–1.48)
0.66 (0.52–0.84)0.71 (0.58–0.87)
0.70 (0.60–0.82)0.56 (0.31–1.01)
0.69 (0.58–0.83)0.66 (0.50–0.88)
0.67 (0.53–0.86)0.65 (0.52–0.80)1.08 (0.59–1.96)
0.68 (0.56–0.83)0.70 (0.55–0.90)
0.68 (0.58–0.80)0.71 (0.44–1.14)
0.63 (0.46–0.85)0.70 (0.59–0.84)
0.70 (0.55–0.89)0.68 (0.55–0.83)
0.73 (0.60–0.90)0.63 (0.50–0.80)
0.57 (0.44–0.75)0.71 (0.58–0.89)0.85 (0.59–1.24)
0.59 (0.45–0.77)0.87 (0.67–1.13)0.63 (0.48–0.83)
0.60 (0.47–0.77)0.75 (0.57–0.98)0.75 (0.56–1.00)
0.68 (0.52–0.88)0.69 (0.53–0.90)0.70 (0.54–0.92)
0.63 (0.47–0.83)0.66 (0.51–0.85)0.79 (0.61–1.03)
0.70 (0.54–0.91)0.69 (0.53–0.90)0.67 (0.51–0.87)
HR (95%CI)
394/1598 (24.7%)
300/942 (31.8%)94/656 (14.3%)
368/1490 (24.7%)26/108 (24.1%)
162/732 (22.1%)232/866 (26.8%)
302/1070 (28.2%)92/528 (17.4%)
362/1474 (24.6%)32/124 (25.8%)
270/1115 (24.2%)124/483 (25.7%)
153/511 (29.9%)220/923 (23.8%)20/153 (13.1%)
247/979 (25.2%)147/618 (23.8%)
349/1425 (24.5%)45/172 (26.2%)
102/349 (29.2%)292/1246 (23.4%)
162/691 (23.4%)232/906 (25.6%)
215/931 (23.1%)179/666 (26.9%)
137/426 (32.2%)197/844 (23.3%)60/326 (18.4%)
132/542 (24.4%)128/520 (24.6%)134/535 (25.0%)
154/527 (29.2%)126/539 (23.4%)110/522 (21.1%)
131/555 (23.6%)128/502 (25.5%)134/530 (25.3%)
119/520 (22.9%)150/541 (27.7%)125/536 (23.3%)
131/539 24.3%)126/519 (24.3%)137/539 (25.4%)
Placebo
n/N(%)
281/1548 (18.2%)
201/908 (22.1%)80/640 (12.5%)
262/1454 (18.0%)19/94 (20.2%)
116/740 (15.7%)165/808 (20.4%)
221/1061 (20.8%)60/487 (12.3%)
264/1437 (18.4%)17/111 (15.3%)
196/1090 (18.0%)85/458 (18.6%)
111/518 (21.4%)146/871 (16.8%)23/152 (15.1%)
174/945 (18.4%)107/600 (17.8%)
252/1384 (18.2%)29/161 (18.0%)
70/351 (19.9%)209/1189 (17.6%)
117/654 (17.9%)164/891 (18.4%)
159/883 (18.0%)122/662 (18.4%)
84/414 (20.3%)143/810 (17.7%)54/321 (16.8%)
86/557 (15.4%)106/489 (21.7%)89/499 (17.8%)
104/540 (19.3%)95/528 (18.0%)79/468 (16.9%)
95/561 (16.9%)93/499 (18.6%)90/477 (18.9%)
84/536 (15.7%)97/507 (19.1%)
100/502 (19.9%)
93/517 (18.0%)96/525 (18.3%)92/503 (18.3%)
IcosapentEthyl
n/N (%)
Endpoint/Subgroup Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Placebo Better
IcosapentEthylBetter
0.2 0.60.4 0.8 1.0 1.41.2 1.81.6
Primary Endpoint: Subgroups – USACV Death, MI, Stroke, Coronary Revasc, Unstable Angina
Ezetimibe UseNoYes
0.55262/1454 (18.0%)
19/94 (20.2%)0.68 (0.58–0.80)0.82 (0.45–1.48)
368/1490 (24.7%)26/108 (24.1%)
Subgroup HR (95% CI) IntP Val
Placebon/N (%)
Icosapent Ethyln/N (%)
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
Bhatt DL, Miller M, Brinton EA, et al. Circulation. 2019. Bhatt DL. AHA 2019, Philadelphia.
13
14
2/27/2020
8
Primary Composite (ITT)
Risk CategorySecondary PreventionPrimary Prevention
Ezetimibe UseNoYes
Age Group<65 Years≥65 Years
SexMaleFemale
White vs Non-WhiteWhiteNon-White
Baseline DiabetesDiabetesNo Diabetes
Baseline Statin IntensityHighModerateLow
TG ≥200 mg/dL vs <200 mg/dL TG ≥200 mg/dLTG <200 mg/dL
TG ≥150 mg/dL vs <150 mg/dLTG ≥150 mg/dLTG <150 mg/dL
TG ≥200 and HDL-C ≤35YesNo
hsCRP ≤2 vs >2 mg/L≤2 mg/L>2 mg/L
hsCRP ≤3 vs >3 mg/L≤3 mg/L>3 mg/L
Baseline eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2
60 - <90 mL/min/1.73m2
≥90 mL/min/1.73m2
LDL-C (Derived) by Tertiles≥12 - ≤ 65 mg/dL>65 - ≤80 mg/dL>80 - ≤222 mg/dL
HDL-C by Tertiles≥19 - ≤36 mg/dL>36 - ≤43.5 mg/dL>43.5 - ≤96.5 mg/dL
ApoB by Tertiles≥17.5 - ≤76 mg/dL>76 - ≤89 mg/dL>89 - ≤196 mg/dL
Non-HDL by Tertiles≥68 - ≤107.5 mg/dL>107.5 - ≤125 mg/dL>125 - ≤244 mg/dL
Triglycerides by Tertiles≥97 - ≤191 mg/dL>191 - ≤250 mg/dL>250 - ≤822.25 mg/dL
0.13
0.55
0.67
0.69
0.45
0.77
0.28
0.89
0.82
0.53
0.86
0.39
0.19
0.09
0.43
0.98
0.49
0.97
Int pVal
0.70 (0.59–0.83)0.65 (0.47–0.91)
0.69 (0.59–0.80)
0.64 (0.54–0.77)0.84 (0.62–1.13)
0.68 (0.58–0.80)0.82 (0.45–1.48)
0.66 (0.52–0.84)0.71 (0.58–0.87)
0.70 (0.60–0.82)0.56 (0.31–1.01)
0.69 (0.58–0.83)0.66 (0.50–0.88)
0.67 (0.53–0.86)0.65 (0.52–0.80)1.08 (0.59–1.96)
0.68 (0.56–0.83)0.70 (0.55–0.90)
0.68 (0.58–0.80)0.71 (0.44–1.14)
0.63 (0.46–0.85)0.70 (0.59–0.84)
0.70 (0.55–0.89)0.68 (0.55–0.83)
0.73 (0.60–0.90)0.63 (0.50–0.80)
0.57 (0.44–0.75)0.71 (0.58–0.89)0.85 (0.59–1.24)
0.59 (0.45–0.77)0.87 (0.67–1.13)0.63 (0.48–0.83)
0.60 (0.47–0.77)0.75 (0.57–0.98)0.75 (0.56–1.00)
0.68 (0.52–0.88)0.69 (0.53–0.90)0.70 (0.54–0.92)
0.63 (0.47–0.83)0.66 (0.51–0.85)0.79 (0.61–1.03)
0.70 (0.54–0.91)0.69 (0.53–0.90)0.67 (0.51–0.87)
HR (95%CI)
394/1598 (24.7%)
300/942 (31.8%)94/656 (14.3%)
368/1490 (24.7%)26/108 (24.1%)
162/732 (22.1%)232/866 (26.8%)
302/1070 (28.2%)92/528 (17.4%)
362/1474 (24.6%)32/124 (25.8%)
270/1115 (24.2%)124/483 (25.7%)
153/511 (29.9%)220/923 (23.8%)20/153 (13.1%)
247/979 (25.2%)147/618 (23.8%)
349/1425 (24.5%)45/172 (26.2%)
102/349 (29.2%)292/1246 (23.4%)
162/691 (23.4%)232/906 (25.6%)
215/931 (23.1%)179/666 (26.9%)
137/426 (32.2%)197/844 (23.3%)60/326 (18.4%)
132/542 (24.4%)128/520 (24.6%)134/535 (25.0%)
154/527 (29.2%)126/539 (23.4%)110/522 (21.1%)
131/555 (23.6%)128/502 (25.5%)134/530 (25.3%)
119/520 (22.9%)150/541 (27.7%)125/536 (23.3%)
131/539 24.3%)126/519 (24.3%)137/539 (25.4%)
Placebo
n/N(%)
281/1548 (18.2%)
201/908 (22.1%)80/640 (12.5%)
262/1454 (18.0%)19/94 (20.2%)
116/740 (15.7%)165/808 (20.4%)
221/1061 (20.8%)60/487 (12.3%)
264/1437 (18.4%)17/111 (15.3%)
196/1090 (18.0%)85/458 (18.6%)
111/518 (21.4%)146/871 (16.8%)23/152 (15.1%)
174/945 (18.4%)107/600 (17.8%)
252/1384 (18.2%)29/161 (18.0%)
70/351 (19.9%)209/1189 (17.6%)
117/654 (17.9%)164/891 (18.4%)
159/883 (18.0%)122/662 (18.4%)
84/414 (20.3%)143/810 (17.7%)54/321 (16.8%)
86/557 (15.4%)106/489 (21.7%)89/499 (17.8%)
104/540 (19.3%)95/528 (18.0%)79/468 (16.9%)
95/561 (16.9%)93/499 (18.6%)90/477 (18.9%)
84/536 (15.7%)97/507 (19.1%)
100/502 (19.9%)
93/517 (18.0%)96/525 (18.3%)92/503 (18.3%)
IcosapentEthyl
n/N (%)
Endpoint/Subgroup Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Placebo Better
IcosapentEthylBetter
0.2 0.60.4 0.8 1.0 1.41.2 1.81.6
Primary Endpoint: Subgroups – USACV Death, MI, Stroke, Coronary Revasc, Unstable Angina
SexMaleFemale
0.69221/1061 (20.8%)60/487 (12.3%)
0.70 (0.59–0.83)0.65 (0.47–0.91)
302/1070 (28.2%)92/528 (17.4%)
Subgroup HR (95% CI) IntP Val
Placebon/N (%)
Icosapent Ethyln/N (%)
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
Bhatt DL, Miller M, Brinton EA, et al. Circulation. 2019. Bhatt DL. AHA 2019, Philadelphia.
Primary Composite (ITT)
Risk CategorySecondary PreventionPrimary Prevention
Ezetimibe UseNoYes
Age Group<65 Years≥65 Years
SexMaleFemale
White vs Non-WhiteWhiteNon-White
Baseline DiabetesDiabetesNo Diabetes
Baseline Statin IntensityHighModerateLow
TG ≥200 mg/dL vs <200 mg/dL TG ≥200 mg/dLTG <200 mg/dL
TG ≥150 mg/dL vs <150 mg/dLTG ≥150 mg/dLTG <150 mg/dL
TG ≥200 and HDL-C ≤35YesNo
hsCRP ≤2 vs >2 mg/L≤2 mg/L>2 mg/L
hsCRP ≤3 vs >3 mg/L≤3 mg/L>3 mg/L
Baseline eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2
60 - <90 mL/min/1.73m2
≥90 mL/min/1.73m2
LDL-C (Derived) by Tertiles≥12 - ≤ 65 mg/dL>65 - ≤80 mg/dL>80 - ≤222 mg/dL
HDL-C by Tertiles≥19 - ≤36 mg/dL>36 - ≤43.5 mg/dL>43.5 - ≤96.5 mg/dL
ApoB by Tertiles≥17.5 - ≤76 mg/dL>76 - ≤89 mg/dL>89 - ≤196 mg/dL
Non-HDL by Tertiles≥68 - ≤107.5 mg/dL>107.5 - ≤125 mg/dL>125 - ≤244 mg/dL
Triglycerides by Tertiles≥97 - ≤191 mg/dL>191 - ≤250 mg/dL>250 - ≤822.25 mg/dL
0.13
0.55
0.67
0.69
0.45
0.77
0.28
0.89
0.82
0.53
0.86
0.39
0.19
0.09
0.43
0.98
0.49
0.97
Int pVal
0.70 (0.59–0.83)0.65 (0.47–0.91)
0.69 (0.59–0.80)
0.64 (0.54–0.77)0.84 (0.62–1.13)
0.68 (0.58–0.80)0.82 (0.45–1.48)
0.66 (0.52–0.84)0.71 (0.58–0.87)
0.70 (0.60–0.82)0.56 (0.31–1.01)
0.69 (0.58–0.83)0.66 (0.50–0.88)
0.67 (0.53–0.86)0.65 (0.52–0.80)1.08 (0.59–1.96)
0.68 (0.56–0.83)0.70 (0.55–0.90)
0.68 (0.58–0.80)0.71 (0.44–1.14)
0.63 (0.46–0.85)0.70 (0.59–0.84)
0.70 (0.55–0.89)0.68 (0.55–0.83)
0.73 (0.60–0.90)0.63 (0.50–0.80)
0.57 (0.44–0.75)0.71 (0.58–0.89)0.85 (0.59–1.24)
0.59 (0.45–0.77)0.87 (0.67–1.13)0.63 (0.48–0.83)
0.60 (0.47–0.77)0.75 (0.57–0.98)0.75 (0.56–1.00)
0.68 (0.52–0.88)0.69 (0.53–0.90)0.70 (0.54–0.92)
0.63 (0.47–0.83)0.66 (0.51–0.85)0.79 (0.61–1.03)
0.70 (0.54–0.91)0.69 (0.53–0.90)0.67 (0.51–0.87)
HR (95%CI)
394/1598 (24.7%)
300/942 (31.8%)94/656 (14.3%)
368/1490 (24.7%)26/108 (24.1%)
162/732 (22.1%)232/866 (26.8%)
302/1070 (28.2%)92/528 (17.4%)
362/1474 (24.6%)32/124 (25.8%)
270/1115 (24.2%)124/483 (25.7%)
153/511 (29.9%)220/923 (23.8%)20/153 (13.1%)
247/979 (25.2%)147/618 (23.8%)
349/1425 (24.5%)45/172 (26.2%)
102/349 (29.2%)292/1246 (23.4%)
162/691 (23.4%)232/906 (25.6%)
215/931 (23.1%)179/666 (26.9%)
137/426 (32.2%)197/844 (23.3%)60/326 (18.4%)
132/542 (24.4%)128/520 (24.6%)134/535 (25.0%)
154/527 (29.2%)126/539 (23.4%)110/522 (21.1%)
131/555 (23.6%)128/502 (25.5%)134/530 (25.3%)
119/520 (22.9%)150/541 (27.7%)125/536 (23.3%)
131/539 24.3%)126/519 (24.3%)137/539 (25.4%)
Placebo
n/N(%)
281/1548 (18.2%)
201/908 (22.1%)80/640 (12.5%)
262/1454 (18.0%)19/94 (20.2%)
116/740 (15.7%)165/808 (20.4%)
221/1061 (20.8%)60/487 (12.3%)
264/1437 (18.4%)17/111 (15.3%)
196/1090 (18.0%)85/458 (18.6%)
111/518 (21.4%)146/871 (16.8%)23/152 (15.1%)
174/945 (18.4%)107/600 (17.8%)
252/1384 (18.2%)29/161 (18.0%)
70/351 (19.9%)209/1189 (17.6%)
117/654 (17.9%)164/891 (18.4%)
159/883 (18.0%)122/662 (18.4%)
84/414 (20.3%)143/810 (17.7%)54/321 (16.8%)
86/557 (15.4%)106/489 (21.7%)89/499 (17.8%)
104/540 (19.3%)95/528 (18.0%)79/468 (16.9%)
95/561 (16.9%)93/499 (18.6%)90/477 (18.9%)
84/536 (15.7%)97/507 (19.1%)
100/502 (19.9%)
93/517 (18.0%)96/525 (18.3%)92/503 (18.3%)
IcosapentEthyl
n/N (%)
Endpoint/Subgroup Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Placebo Better
IcosapentEthylBetter
0.2 0.60.4 0.8 1.0 1.41.2 1.81.6
Primary Endpoint: Subgroups – USACV Death, MI, Stroke, Coronary Revasc, Unstable Angina
Age Group<65 Years≥65 Years
0.67116/740 (15.7%)165/808 (20.4%)
0.66 (0.52–0.84)0.71 (0.58–0.87)
162/732 (22.1%)232/866 (26.8%)
Subgroup HR (95% CI) IntP Val
Placebon/N (%)
Icosapent Ethyln/N (%)
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
Bhatt DL, Miller M, Brinton EA, et al. Circulation. 2019. Bhatt DL. AHA 2019, Philadelphia.
15
16
2/27/2020
9
Primary Composite (ITT)
Risk CategorySecondary PreventionPrimary Prevention
Ezetimibe UseNoYes
Age Group<65 Years≥65 Years
SexMaleFemale
White vs Non-WhiteWhiteNon-White
Baseline DiabetesDiabetesNo Diabetes
Baseline Statin IntensityHighModerateLow
TG ≥200 mg/dL vs <200 mg/dL TG ≥200 mg/dLTG <200 mg/dL
TG ≥150 mg/dL vs <150 mg/dLTG ≥150 mg/dLTG <150 mg/dL
TG ≥200 and HDL-C ≤35YesNo
hsCRP ≤2 vs >2 mg/L≤2 mg/L>2 mg/L
hsCRP ≤3 vs >3 mg/L≤3 mg/L>3 mg/L
Baseline eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2
60 - <90 mL/min/1.73m2
≥90 mL/min/1.73m2
LDL-C (Derived) by Tertiles≥12 - ≤ 65 mg/dL>65 - ≤80 mg/dL>80 - ≤222 mg/dL
HDL-C by Tertiles≥19 - ≤36 mg/dL>36 - ≤43.5 mg/dL>43.5 - ≤96.5 mg/dL
ApoB by Tertiles≥17.5 - ≤76 mg/dL>76 - ≤89 mg/dL>89 - ≤196 mg/dL
Non-HDL by Tertiles≥68 - ≤107.5 mg/dL>107.5 - ≤125 mg/dL>125 - ≤244 mg/dL
Triglycerides by Tertiles≥97 - ≤191 mg/dL>191 - ≤250 mg/dL>250 - ≤822.25 mg/dL
0.13
0.55
0.67
0.69
0.45
0.77
0.28
0.89
0.82
0.53
0.86
0.39
0.19
0.09
0.43
0.98
0.49
0.97
Int pVal
0.70 (0.59–0.83)0.65 (0.47–0.91)
0.69 (0.59–0.80)
0.64 (0.54–0.77)0.84 (0.62–1.13)
0.68 (0.58–0.80)0.82 (0.45–1.48)
0.66 (0.52–0.84)0.71 (0.58–0.87)
0.70 (0.60–0.82)0.56 (0.31–1.01)
0.69 (0.58–0.83)0.66 (0.50–0.88)
0.67 (0.53–0.86)0.65 (0.52–0.80)1.08 (0.59–1.96)
0.68 (0.56–0.83)0.70 (0.55–0.90)
0.68 (0.58–0.80)0.71 (0.44–1.14)
0.63 (0.46–0.85)0.70 (0.59–0.84)
0.70 (0.55–0.89)0.68 (0.55–0.83)
0.73 (0.60–0.90)0.63 (0.50–0.80)
0.57 (0.44–0.75)0.71 (0.58–0.89)0.85 (0.59–1.24)
0.59 (0.45–0.77)0.87 (0.67–1.13)0.63 (0.48–0.83)
0.60 (0.47–0.77)0.75 (0.57–0.98)0.75 (0.56–1.00)
0.68 (0.52–0.88)0.69 (0.53–0.90)0.70 (0.54–0.92)
0.63 (0.47–0.83)0.66 (0.51–0.85)0.79 (0.61–1.03)
0.70 (0.54–0.91)0.69 (0.53–0.90)0.67 (0.51–0.87)
HR (95%CI)
394/1598 (24.7%)
300/942 (31.8%)94/656 (14.3%)
368/1490 (24.7%)26/108 (24.1%)
162/732 (22.1%)232/866 (26.8%)
302/1070 (28.2%)92/528 (17.4%)
362/1474 (24.6%)32/124 (25.8%)
270/1115 (24.2%)124/483 (25.7%)
153/511 (29.9%)220/923 (23.8%)20/153 (13.1%)
247/979 (25.2%)147/618 (23.8%)
349/1425 (24.5%)45/172 (26.2%)
102/349 (29.2%)292/1246 (23.4%)
162/691 (23.4%)232/906 (25.6%)
215/931 (23.1%)179/666 (26.9%)
137/426 (32.2%)197/844 (23.3%)60/326 (18.4%)
132/542 (24.4%)128/520 (24.6%)134/535 (25.0%)
154/527 (29.2%)126/539 (23.4%)110/522 (21.1%)
131/555 (23.6%)128/502 (25.5%)134/530 (25.3%)
119/520 (22.9%)150/541 (27.7%)125/536 (23.3%)
131/539 24.3%)126/519 (24.3%)137/539 (25.4%)
Placebo
n/N(%)
281/1548 (18.2%)
201/908 (22.1%)80/640 (12.5%)
262/1454 (18.0%)19/94 (20.2%)
116/740 (15.7%)165/808 (20.4%)
221/1061 (20.8%)60/487 (12.3%)
264/1437 (18.4%)17/111 (15.3%)
196/1090 (18.0%)85/458 (18.6%)
111/518 (21.4%)146/871 (16.8%)23/152 (15.1%)
174/945 (18.4%)107/600 (17.8%)
252/1384 (18.2%)29/161 (18.0%)
70/351 (19.9%)209/1189 (17.6%)
117/654 (17.9%)164/891 (18.4%)
159/883 (18.0%)122/662 (18.4%)
84/414 (20.3%)143/810 (17.7%)54/321 (16.8%)
86/557 (15.4%)106/489 (21.7%)89/499 (17.8%)
104/540 (19.3%)95/528 (18.0%)79/468 (16.9%)
95/561 (16.9%)93/499 (18.6%)90/477 (18.9%)
84/536 (15.7%)97/507 (19.1%)
100/502 (19.9%)
93/517 (18.0%)96/525 (18.3%)92/503 (18.3%)
IcosapentEthyl
n/N (%)
Endpoint/Subgroup Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Placebo Better
IcosapentEthylBetter
0.2 0.60.4 0.8 1.0 1.41.2 1.81.6
Primary Endpoint: Subgroups – USACV Death, MI, Stroke, Coronary Revasc, Unstable Angina
White vs Non-WhiteWhiteNon-White
0.45264/1437 (18.4%)
17/111 (15.3%)0.70 (0.60–0.82)0.56 (0.31–1.01)
362/1474 (24.6%)32/124 (25.8%)
Subgroup HR (95% CI) IntP Val
Placebon/N (%)
Icosapent Ethyln/N (%)
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
Bhatt DL, Miller M, Brinton EA, et al. Circulation. 2019. Bhatt DL. AHA 2019, Philadelphia.
Primary Composite (ITT)
Risk CategorySecondary PreventionPrimary Prevention
Ezetimibe UseNoYes
Age Group<65 Years≥65 Years
SexMaleFemale
White vs Non-WhiteWhiteNon-White
Baseline DiabetesDiabetesNo Diabetes
Baseline Statin IntensityHighModerateLow
TG ≥200 mg/dL vs <200 mg/dL TG ≥200 mg/dLTG <200 mg/dL
TG ≥150 mg/dL vs <150 mg/dLTG ≥150 mg/dLTG <150 mg/dL
TG ≥200 and HDL-C ≤35YesNo
hsCRP ≤2 vs >2 mg/L≤2 mg/L>2 mg/L
hsCRP ≤3 vs >3 mg/L≤3 mg/L>3 mg/L
Baseline eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2
60 - <90 mL/min/1.73m2
≥90 mL/min/1.73m2
LDL-C (Derived) by Tertiles≥12 - ≤ 65 mg/dL>65 - ≤80 mg/dL>80 - ≤222 mg/dL
HDL-C by Tertiles≥19 - ≤36 mg/dL>36 - ≤43.5 mg/dL>43.5 - ≤96.5 mg/dL
ApoB by Tertiles≥17.5 - ≤76 mg/dL>76 - ≤89 mg/dL>89 - ≤196 mg/dL
Non-HDL by Tertiles≥68 - ≤107.5 mg/dL>107.5 - ≤125 mg/dL>125 - ≤244 mg/dL
Triglycerides by Tertiles≥97 - ≤191 mg/dL>191 - ≤250 mg/dL>250 - ≤822.25 mg/dL
0.13
0.55
0.67
0.69
0.45
0.77
0.28
0.89
0.82
0.53
0.86
0.39
0.19
0.09
0.43
0.98
0.49
0.97
Int pVal
0.70 (0.59–0.83)0.65 (0.47–0.91)
0.69 (0.59–0.80)
0.64 (0.54–0.77)0.84 (0.62–1.13)
0.68 (0.58–0.80)0.82 (0.45–1.48)
0.66 (0.52–0.84)0.71 (0.58–0.87)
0.70 (0.60–0.82)0.56 (0.31–1.01)
0.69 (0.58–0.83)0.66 (0.50–0.88)
0.67 (0.53–0.86)0.65 (0.52–0.80)1.08 (0.59–1.96)
0.68 (0.56–0.83)0.70 (0.55–0.90)
0.68 (0.58–0.80)0.71 (0.44–1.14)
0.63 (0.46–0.85)0.70 (0.59–0.84)
0.70 (0.55–0.89)0.68 (0.55–0.83)
0.73 (0.60–0.90)0.63 (0.50–0.80)
0.57 (0.44–0.75)0.71 (0.58–0.89)0.85 (0.59–1.24)
0.59 (0.45–0.77)0.87 (0.67–1.13)0.63 (0.48–0.83)
0.60 (0.47–0.77)0.75 (0.57–0.98)0.75 (0.56–1.00)
0.68 (0.52–0.88)0.69 (0.53–0.90)0.70 (0.54–0.92)
0.63 (0.47–0.83)0.66 (0.51–0.85)0.79 (0.61–1.03)
0.70 (0.54–0.91)0.69 (0.53–0.90)0.67 (0.51–0.87)
HR (95%CI)
394/1598 (24.7%)
300/942 (31.8%)94/656 (14.3%)
368/1490 (24.7%)26/108 (24.1%)
162/732 (22.1%)232/866 (26.8%)
302/1070 (28.2%)92/528 (17.4%)
362/1474 (24.6%)32/124 (25.8%)
270/1115 (24.2%)124/483 (25.7%)
153/511 (29.9%)220/923 (23.8%)20/153 (13.1%)
247/979 (25.2%)147/618 (23.8%)
349/1425 (24.5%)45/172 (26.2%)
102/349 (29.2%)292/1246 (23.4%)
162/691 (23.4%)232/906 (25.6%)
215/931 (23.1%)179/666 (26.9%)
137/426 (32.2%)197/844 (23.3%)60/326 (18.4%)
132/542 (24.4%)128/520 (24.6%)134/535 (25.0%)
154/527 (29.2%)126/539 (23.4%)110/522 (21.1%)
131/555 (23.6%)128/502 (25.5%)134/530 (25.3%)
119/520 (22.9%)150/541 (27.7%)125/536 (23.3%)
131/539 24.3%)126/519 (24.3%)137/539 (25.4%)
Placebo
n/N(%)
281/1548 (18.2%)
201/908 (22.1%)80/640 (12.5%)
262/1454 (18.0%)19/94 (20.2%)
116/740 (15.7%)165/808 (20.4%)
221/1061 (20.8%)60/487 (12.3%)
264/1437 (18.4%)17/111 (15.3%)
196/1090 (18.0%)85/458 (18.6%)
111/518 (21.4%)146/871 (16.8%)23/152 (15.1%)
174/945 (18.4%)107/600 (17.8%)
252/1384 (18.2%)29/161 (18.0%)
70/351 (19.9%)209/1189 (17.6%)
117/654 (17.9%)164/891 (18.4%)
159/883 (18.0%)122/662 (18.4%)
84/414 (20.3%)143/810 (17.7%)54/321 (16.8%)
86/557 (15.4%)106/489 (21.7%)89/499 (17.8%)
104/540 (19.3%)95/528 (18.0%)79/468 (16.9%)
95/561 (16.9%)93/499 (18.6%)90/477 (18.9%)
84/536 (15.7%)97/507 (19.1%)
100/502 (19.9%)
93/517 (18.0%)96/525 (18.3%)92/503 (18.3%)
IcosapentEthyl
n/N (%)
Endpoint/Subgroup Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Placebo Better
IcosapentEthylBetter
0.2 0.60.4 0.8 1.0 1.41.2 1.81.6
Primary Endpoint: Subgroups – USACV Death, MI, Stroke, Coronary Revasc, Unstable Angina
Baseline DiabetesDiabetesNo Diabetes
0.77196/1090 (18.0%)85/458 (18.6%)
0.69 (0.58–0.83)0.66 (0.50–0.88)
270/1115 (24.2%)124/483 (25.7%)
Subgroup HR (95% CI) IntP Val
Placebon/N (%)
Icosapent Ethyln/N (%)
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
Bhatt DL, Miller M, Brinton EA, et al. Circulation. 2019. Bhatt DL. AHA 2019, Philadelphia.
17
18
2/27/2020
10
Primary Composite (ITT)
Risk CategorySecondary PreventionPrimary Prevention
Ezetimibe UseNoYes
Age Group<65 Years≥65 Years
SexMaleFemale
White vs Non-WhiteWhiteNon-White
Baseline DiabetesDiabetesNo Diabetes
Baseline Statin IntensityHighModerateLow
TG ≥200 mg/dL vs <200 mg/dL TG ≥200 mg/dLTG <200 mg/dL
TG ≥150 mg/dL vs <150 mg/dLTG ≥150 mg/dLTG <150 mg/dL
TG ≥200 and HDL-C ≤35YesNo
hsCRP ≤2 vs >2 mg/L≤2 mg/L>2 mg/L
hsCRP ≤3 vs >3 mg/L≤3 mg/L>3 mg/L
Baseline eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2
60 - <90 mL/min/1.73m2
≥90 mL/min/1.73m2
LDL-C (Derived) by Tertiles≥12 - ≤ 65 mg/dL>65 - ≤80 mg/dL>80 - ≤222 mg/dL
HDL-C by Tertiles≥19 - ≤36 mg/dL>36 - ≤43.5 mg/dL>43.5 - ≤96.5 mg/dL
ApoB by Tertiles≥17.5 - ≤76 mg/dL>76 - ≤89 mg/dL>89 - ≤196 mg/dL
Non-HDL by Tertiles≥68 - ≤107.5 mg/dL>107.5 - ≤125 mg/dL>125 - ≤244 mg/dL
Triglycerides by Tertiles≥97 - ≤191 mg/dL>191 - ≤250 mg/dL>250 - ≤822.25 mg/dL
0.13
0.55
0.67
0.69
0.45
0.77
0.28
0.89
0.82
0.53
0.86
0.39
0.19
0.09
0.43
0.98
0.49
0.97
Int pVal
0.70 (0.59–0.83)0.65 (0.47–0.91)
0.69 (0.59–0.80)
0.64 (0.54–0.77)0.84 (0.62–1.13)
0.68 (0.58–0.80)0.82 (0.45–1.48)
0.66 (0.52–0.84)0.71 (0.58–0.87)
0.70 (0.60–0.82)0.56 (0.31–1.01)
0.69 (0.58–0.83)0.66 (0.50–0.88)
0.67 (0.53–0.86)0.65 (0.52–0.80)1.08 (0.59–1.96)
0.68 (0.56–0.83)0.70 (0.55–0.90)
0.68 (0.58–0.80)0.71 (0.44–1.14)
0.63 (0.46–0.85)0.70 (0.59–0.84)
0.70 (0.55–0.89)0.68 (0.55–0.83)
0.73 (0.60–0.90)0.63 (0.50–0.80)
0.57 (0.44–0.75)0.71 (0.58–0.89)0.85 (0.59–1.24)
0.59 (0.45–0.77)0.87 (0.67–1.13)0.63 (0.48–0.83)
0.60 (0.47–0.77)0.75 (0.57–0.98)0.75 (0.56–1.00)
0.68 (0.52–0.88)0.69 (0.53–0.90)0.70 (0.54–0.92)
0.63 (0.47–0.83)0.66 (0.51–0.85)0.79 (0.61–1.03)
0.70 (0.54–0.91)0.69 (0.53–0.90)0.67 (0.51–0.87)
HR (95%CI)
394/1598 (24.7%)
300/942 (31.8%)94/656 (14.3%)
368/1490 (24.7%)26/108 (24.1%)
162/732 (22.1%)232/866 (26.8%)
302/1070 (28.2%)92/528 (17.4%)
362/1474 (24.6%)32/124 (25.8%)
270/1115 (24.2%)124/483 (25.7%)
153/511 (29.9%)220/923 (23.8%)20/153 (13.1%)
247/979 (25.2%)147/618 (23.8%)
349/1425 (24.5%)45/172 (26.2%)
102/349 (29.2%)292/1246 (23.4%)
162/691 (23.4%)232/906 (25.6%)
215/931 (23.1%)179/666 (26.9%)
137/426 (32.2%)197/844 (23.3%)60/326 (18.4%)
132/542 (24.4%)128/520 (24.6%)134/535 (25.0%)
154/527 (29.2%)126/539 (23.4%)110/522 (21.1%)
131/555 (23.6%)128/502 (25.5%)134/530 (25.3%)
119/520 (22.9%)150/541 (27.7%)125/536 (23.3%)
131/539 24.3%)126/519 (24.3%)137/539 (25.4%)
Placebo
n/N(%)
281/1548 (18.2%)
201/908 (22.1%)80/640 (12.5%)
262/1454 (18.0%)19/94 (20.2%)
116/740 (15.7%)165/808 (20.4%)
221/1061 (20.8%)60/487 (12.3%)
264/1437 (18.4%)17/111 (15.3%)
196/1090 (18.0%)85/458 (18.6%)
111/518 (21.4%)146/871 (16.8%)23/152 (15.1%)
174/945 (18.4%)107/600 (17.8%)
252/1384 (18.2%)29/161 (18.0%)
70/351 (19.9%)209/1189 (17.6%)
117/654 (17.9%)164/891 (18.4%)
159/883 (18.0%)122/662 (18.4%)
84/414 (20.3%)143/810 (17.7%)54/321 (16.8%)
86/557 (15.4%)106/489 (21.7%)89/499 (17.8%)
104/540 (19.3%)95/528 (18.0%)79/468 (16.9%)
95/561 (16.9%)93/499 (18.6%)90/477 (18.9%)
84/536 (15.7%)97/507 (19.1%)
100/502 (19.9%)
93/517 (18.0%)96/525 (18.3%)92/503 (18.3%)
IcosapentEthyl
n/N (%)
Endpoint/Subgroup Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Placebo Better
IcosapentEthylBetter
0.2 0.60.4 0.8 1.0 1.41.2 1.81.6
Primary Endpoint: Subgroups – USACV Death, MI, Stroke, Coronary Revasc, Unstable Angina
ApoB by Tertiles≥17.5 - ≤76 mg/dL>76 - ≤89 mg/dL>89 - ≤196 mg/dL
0.9895/561 (16.9%)93/499 (18.6%)90/477 (18.9%)
0.68 (0.52–0.88)0.69 (0.53–0.90)0.70 (0.54–0.92)
131/555 (23.6%)128/502 (25.5%)134/530 (25.3%)
Subgroup HR (95% CI) IntP Val
Placebon/N (%)
Icosapent Ethyln/N (%)
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
Bhatt DL, Miller M, Brinton EA, et al. Circulation. 2019. Bhatt DL. AHA 2019, Philadelphia.
Primary Composite (ITT)
Risk CategorySecondary PreventionPrimary Prevention
Ezetimibe UseNoYes
Age Group<65 Years≥65 Years
SexMaleFemale
White vs Non-WhiteWhiteNon-White
Baseline DiabetesDiabetesNo Diabetes
Baseline Statin IntensityHighModerateLow
TG ≥200 mg/dL vs <200 mg/dL TG ≥200 mg/dLTG <200 mg/dL
TG ≥150 mg/dL vs <150 mg/dLTG ≥150 mg/dLTG <150 mg/dL
TG ≥200 and HDL-C ≤35YesNo
hsCRP ≤2 vs >2 mg/L≤2 mg/L>2 mg/L
hsCRP ≤3 vs >3 mg/L≤3 mg/L>3 mg/L
Baseline eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2
60 - <90 mL/min/1.73m2
≥90 mL/min/1.73m2
LDL-C (Derived) by Tertiles≥12 - ≤ 65 mg/dL>65 - ≤80 mg/dL>80 - ≤222 mg/dL
HDL-C by Tertiles≥19 - ≤36 mg/dL>36 - ≤43.5 mg/dL>43.5 - ≤96.5 mg/dL
ApoB by Tertiles≥17.5 - ≤76 mg/dL>76 - ≤89 mg/dL>89 - ≤196 mg/dL
Non-HDL by Tertiles≥68 - ≤107.5 mg/dL>107.5 - ≤125 mg/dL>125 - ≤244 mg/dL
Triglycerides by Tertiles≥97 - ≤191 mg/dL>191 - ≤250 mg/dL>250 - ≤822.25 mg/dL
0.13
0.55
0.67
0.69
0.45
0.77
0.28
0.89
0.82
0.53
0.86
0.39
0.19
0.09
0.43
0.98
0.49
0.97
Int pVal
0.70 (0.59–0.83)0.65 (0.47–0.91)
0.69 (0.59–0.80)
0.64 (0.54–0.77)0.84 (0.62–1.13)
0.68 (0.58–0.80)0.82 (0.45–1.48)
0.66 (0.52–0.84)0.71 (0.58–0.87)
0.70 (0.60–0.82)0.56 (0.31–1.01)
0.69 (0.58–0.83)0.66 (0.50–0.88)
0.67 (0.53–0.86)0.65 (0.52–0.80)1.08 (0.59–1.96)
0.68 (0.56–0.83)0.70 (0.55–0.90)
0.68 (0.58–0.80)0.71 (0.44–1.14)
0.63 (0.46–0.85)0.70 (0.59–0.84)
0.70 (0.55–0.89)0.68 (0.55–0.83)
0.73 (0.60–0.90)0.63 (0.50–0.80)
0.57 (0.44–0.75)0.71 (0.58–0.89)0.85 (0.59–1.24)
0.59 (0.45–0.77)0.87 (0.67–1.13)0.63 (0.48–0.83)
0.60 (0.47–0.77)0.75 (0.57–0.98)0.75 (0.56–1.00)
0.68 (0.52–0.88)0.69 (0.53–0.90)0.70 (0.54–0.92)
0.63 (0.47–0.83)0.66 (0.51–0.85)0.79 (0.61–1.03)
0.70 (0.54–0.91)0.69 (0.53–0.90)0.67 (0.51–0.87)
HR (95%CI)
394/1598 (24.7%)
300/942 (31.8%)94/656 (14.3%)
368/1490 (24.7%)26/108 (24.1%)
162/732 (22.1%)232/866 (26.8%)
302/1070 (28.2%)92/528 (17.4%)
362/1474 (24.6%)32/124 (25.8%)
270/1115 (24.2%)124/483 (25.7%)
153/511 (29.9%)220/923 (23.8%)20/153 (13.1%)
247/979 (25.2%)147/618 (23.8%)
349/1425 (24.5%)45/172 (26.2%)
102/349 (29.2%)292/1246 (23.4%)
162/691 (23.4%)232/906 (25.6%)
215/931 (23.1%)179/666 (26.9%)
137/426 (32.2%)197/844 (23.3%)60/326 (18.4%)
132/542 (24.4%)128/520 (24.6%)134/535 (25.0%)
154/527 (29.2%)126/539 (23.4%)110/522 (21.1%)
131/555 (23.6%)128/502 (25.5%)134/530 (25.3%)
119/520 (22.9%)150/541 (27.7%)125/536 (23.3%)
131/539 24.3%)126/519 (24.3%)137/539 (25.4%)
Placebo
n/N(%)
281/1548 (18.2%)
201/908 (22.1%)80/640 (12.5%)
262/1454 (18.0%)19/94 (20.2%)
116/740 (15.7%)165/808 (20.4%)
221/1061 (20.8%)60/487 (12.3%)
264/1437 (18.4%)17/111 (15.3%)
196/1090 (18.0%)85/458 (18.6%)
111/518 (21.4%)146/871 (16.8%)23/152 (15.1%)
174/945 (18.4%)107/600 (17.8%)
252/1384 (18.2%)29/161 (18.0%)
70/351 (19.9%)209/1189 (17.6%)
117/654 (17.9%)164/891 (18.4%)
159/883 (18.0%)122/662 (18.4%)
84/414 (20.3%)143/810 (17.7%)54/321 (16.8%)
86/557 (15.4%)106/489 (21.7%)89/499 (17.8%)
104/540 (19.3%)95/528 (18.0%)79/468 (16.9%)
95/561 (16.9%)93/499 (18.6%)90/477 (18.9%)
84/536 (15.7%)97/507 (19.1%)
100/502 (19.9%)
93/517 (18.0%)96/525 (18.3%)92/503 (18.3%)
IcosapentEthyl
n/N (%)
Endpoint/Subgroup Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Placebo Better
IcosapentEthylBetter
0.2 0.60.4 0.8 1.0 1.41.2 1.81.6
Primary Endpoint: Subgroups – USACV Death, MI, Stroke, Coronary Revasc, Unstable Angina
Triglycerides by Tertiles≥97 - ≤191 mg/dL>191 - ≤250 mg/dL>250 - ≤822.25 mg/dL
0.9793/517 (18.0%)96/525 (18.3%)92/503 (18.3%)
0.70 (0.54–0.91)0.69 (0.53–0.90)0.67 (0.51–0.87)
131/539 24.3%)126/519 (24.3%)137/539 (25.4%)
Subgroup HR (95% CI) IntP Val
Placebon/N (%)
Icosapent Ethyln/N (%)
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
Bhatt DL, Miller M, Brinton EA, et al. Circulation. 2019. Bhatt DL. AHA 2019, Philadelphia.
19
20
2/27/2020
11
Key Secondary Composite (ITT)
Risk CategorySecondary PreventionPrimary Prevention
Ezetimibe UseNoYes
Age Group<65 Years≥65 Years
SexMaleFemale
White vs Non-WhiteWhiteNon-White
Baseline DiabetesDiabetesNo Diabetes
Baseline Statin IntensityHighModerateLow
TG ≥200 mg/dL vs <200 mg/dL TG ≥200 mg/dLTG <200 mg/dL
TG ≥150 mg/dL vs <150 mg/dLTG ≥150 mg/dLTG <150 mg/dL
TG ≥200 and HDL-C ≤35YesNo
hsCRP ≤2 vs >2 mg/L≤2 mg/L>2 mg/L
hsCRP ≤3 vs >3 mg/L≤3 mg/L>3 mg/L
Baseline eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2
60 - <90 mL/min/1.73m2
≥90 mL/min/1.73m2
LDL-C (Derived) by Tertiles≥12 - ≤ 65 mg/dL>65 - ≤80 mg/dL>80 - ≤222 mg/dL
HDL-C by Tertiles≥19 - ≤36 mg/dL>36 - ≤43.5 mg/dL>43.5 - ≤96.5 mg/dL
ApoB by Tertiles≥17.5 - ≤76 mg/dL>76 - ≤89 mg/dL>89 - ≤196 mg/dL
Non-HDL by Tertiles≥68 - ≤107.5 mg/dL>107.5 - ≤125 mg/dL>125 - ≤244 mg/dL
Triglycerides by Tertiles≥97 - ≤191 mg/dL>191 - ≤250 mg/dL>250 - ≤822.25 mg/dL
0.41
0.39
0.93
0.87
0.24
0.50
0.12
0.97
0.91
0.78
0.33
0.26
0.41
0.28
0.53
0.85
0.96
0.93
Int pValHR (95%CI)Placebo
n/N(%)
IcosapentEthyl
n/N (%)
Endpoint/Subgroup Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Placebo Better
IcosapentEthylBetter
0.2 0.60.4 0.8 1.0 1.41.2 1.81.6
187/1548 (12.1%)
133/908 (14.6%)54/640 (8.4%)
175/1454 (12.0%)12/94 (12.8%)
77/740 (10.4%)110/808 (13.6%)
142/1061 (13.4%) 45/487 (9.2%)
174/1437 (12.1%)13/111 (11.7%)
132/1090 (12.1%)55/458 (12.0%)
76/518 (14.7%)92/871 (10.6%)18/152 (11.8%)
116/945 (12.3%)71/600 (11.8%)
169/1384 (12.2%)18/161 (11.2%)
44/351 (12.5%)141/1189 (11.9%)
72/654 (11.0%)115/891 (12.9%)
100/883 (11.3%)87/662 (13.1%)
71/414 (17.1%)81/810 (10.0%)35/321 (10.9%)
54/557 (9.7%)70/489 (14.3%)63/499 (12.6%)
69/540 (12.8%)62/528 (11.7%)54/468 (11.5%)
63/561 (11.2%)60/499 (12.0%)61/477 (12.8%)
56/536 (10.4%)67/507 (13.2%)64/502 (12.7%)
60/517 (11.6%)65/525 (12.4%)62/503 (12.3%)
266/1598 (16.6%)
198/942 (21.0%)68/656 (10.4%)
252/1490 (16.9%)14/108 (13.0%)
106/732 (14.5%)160/866 (18.5%)
198/1070 (18.5%) 68/528 (12.9%)
238/1474 (16.1%)28/124 (22.6%)
194/1115 (17.4%)72/483 (14.9%)
98/511 (19.2%)154/923 (16.7%)13/153 (8.5%)
165/979 (16.9%)101/618 (16.3%)
237/1425 (16.6%)29/172 (16.9%)
63/349 (18.1%)203/1246 (16.3%)
93/691 (13.5%)173/906 (19.1%)
132/931 (14.2%)134/666 (20.1%)
102/426 (23.9%)127/844 (15.0%)37/326 (11.3%)
86/542 (15.9%)89/520 (17.1%)91/535 (17.0%)
105/527 (19.9%)82/539 (15.2%)76/522 (14.6%)
83/555 (15.0%)91/502 (18.1%)91/530 (17.2%)
76/520 (14.6%)100/541 (18.5%)90/536 (16.8%)
91/539 (16.9%)83/519 (16.0%)92/539 (17.1%)
0.69 (0.57–0.83)
0.66 (0.53–0.82)0.78 (0.55–1.12)
0.67 (0.56–0.82)0.96 (0.44–2.07)
0.69 (0.51–0.92)0.70 (0.55–0.89)
0.70 (0.56–0.86)0.68 (0.46–0.99)
0.71 (0.59–0.87)0.47 (0.24–0.90)
0.66 (0.53–0.82)0.76 (0.54–1.09)
0.72 (0.53–0.98)0.60 (0.46–0.78)1.29 (0.63–2.64)
0.69 (0.54–0.87)0.69 (0.51–0.93)
0.68 (0.56–0.83)0.64 (0.35–1.16)
0.65 (0.44–0.95)0.69 (0.56–0.86)
0.78 (0.57–1.06)0.64 (0.50–0.81)
0.76 (0.59–0.99)0.61 (0.47–0.80)
0.67 (0.49–0.91)0.63 (0.48–0.84)0.91 (0.57–1.44)
0.57 (0.41–0.81)0.83 (0.61–1.14)0.67 (0.49–0.93)
0.60 (0.44–0.81)0.76 (0.55–1.06)0.73 (0.52–1.04)
0.72 (0.52–1.00)0.63 (0.46–0.88)0.71 (0.51–0.98)
0.67 (0.47–0.94)0.71 (0.52–0.97)0.69 (0.50–0.94)
0.66 (0.47–0.91)0.73 (0.53–1.01)0.68 (0.49–0.93)
Key Secondary Endpoint: Subgroups – USACV Death, MI, Stroke
Bhatt DL, Miller M, Brinton EA, et al. Circulation. 2019. Bhatt DL. AHA 2019, Philadelphia.
Key Secondary Composite (ITT)
Risk CategorySecondary PreventionPrimary Prevention
Ezetimibe UseNoYes
Age Group<65 Years≥65 Years
SexMaleFemale
White vs Non-WhiteWhiteNon-White
Baseline DiabetesDiabetesNo Diabetes
Baseline Statin IntensityHighModerateLow
TG ≥200 mg/dL vs <200 mg/dL TG ≥200 mg/dLTG <200 mg/dL
TG ≥150 mg/dL vs <150 mg/dLTG ≥150 mg/dLTG <150 mg/dL
TG ≥200 and HDL-C ≤35YesNo
hsCRP ≤2 vs >2 mg/L≤2 mg/L>2 mg/L
hsCRP ≤3 vs >3 mg/L≤3 mg/L>3 mg/L
Baseline eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2
60 - <90 mL/min/1.73m2
≥90 mL/min/1.73m2
LDL-C (Derived) by Tertiles≥12 - ≤ 65 mg/dL>65 - ≤80 mg/dL>80 - ≤222 mg/dL
HDL-C by Tertiles≥19 - ≤36 mg/dL>36 - ≤43.5 mg/dL>43.5 - ≤96.5 mg/dL
ApoB by Tertiles≥17.5 - ≤76 mg/dL>76 - ≤89 mg/dL>89 - ≤196 mg/dL
Non-HDL by Tertiles≥68 - ≤107.5 mg/dL>107.5 - ≤125 mg/dL>125 - ≤244 mg/dL
Triglycerides by Tertiles≥97 - ≤191 mg/dL>191 - ≤250 mg/dL>250 - ≤822.25 mg/dL
0.41
0.39
0.93
0.87
0.24
0.50
0.12
0.97
0.91
0.78
0.33
0.26
0.41
0.28
0.53
0.85
0.96
0.93
Int pValHR (95%CI)Placebo
n/N(%)
IcosapentEthyl
n/N (%)
Endpoint/Subgroup Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Placebo Better
IcosapentEthylBetter
0.2 0.60.4 0.8 1.0 1.41.2 1.81.6
187/1548 (12.1%)
133/908 (14.6%)54/640 (8.4%)
175/1454 (12.0%)12/94 (12.8%)
77/740 (10.4%)110/808 (13.6%)
142/1061 (13.4%) 45/487 (9.2%)
174/1437 (12.1%)13/111 (11.7%)
132/1090 (12.1%)55/458 (12.0%)
76/518 (14.7%)92/871 (10.6%)18/152 (11.8%)
116/945 (12.3%)71/600 (11.8%)
169/1384 (12.2%)18/161 (11.2%)
44/351 (12.5%)141/1189 (11.9%)
72/654 (11.0%)115/891 (12.9%)
100/883 (11.3%)87/662 (13.1%)
71/414 (17.1%)81/810 (10.0%)35/321 (10.9%)
54/557 (9.7%)70/489 (14.3%)63/499 (12.6%)
69/540 (12.8%)62/528 (11.7%)54/468 (11.5%)
63/561 (11.2%)60/499 (12.0%)61/477 (12.8%)
56/536 (10.4%)67/507 (13.2%)64/502 (12.7%)
60/517 (11.6%)65/525 (12.4%)62/503 (12.3%)
266/1598 (16.6%)
198/942 (21.0%)68/656 (10.4%)
252/1490 (16.9%)14/108 (13.0%)
106/732 (14.5%)160/866 (18.5%)
198/1070 (18.5%) 68/528 (12.9%)
238/1474 (16.1%)28/124 (22.6%)
194/1115 (17.4%)72/483 (14.9%)
98/511 (19.2%)154/923 (16.7%)13/153 (8.5%)
165/979 (16.9%)101/618 (16.3%)
237/1425 (16.6%)29/172 (16.9%)
63/349 (18.1%)203/1246 (16.3%)
93/691 (13.5%)173/906 (19.1%)
132/931 (14.2%)134/666 (20.1%)
102/426 (23.9%)127/844 (15.0%)37/326 (11.3%)
86/542 (15.9%)89/520 (17.1%)91/535 (17.0%)
105/527 (19.9%)82/539 (15.2%)76/522 (14.6%)
83/555 (15.0%)91/502 (18.1%)91/530 (17.2%)
76/520 (14.6%)100/541 (18.5%)90/536 (16.8%)
91/539 (16.9%)83/519 (16.0%)92/539 (17.1%)
0.69 (0.57–0.83)
0.66 (0.53–0.82)0.78 (0.55–1.12)
0.67 (0.56–0.82)0.96 (0.44–2.07)
0.69 (0.51–0.92)0.70 (0.55–0.89)
0.70 (0.56–0.86)0.68 (0.46–0.99)
0.71 (0.59–0.87)0.47 (0.24–0.90)
0.66 (0.53–0.82)0.76 (0.54–1.09)
0.72 (0.53–0.98)0.60 (0.46–0.78)1.29 (0.63–2.64)
0.69 (0.54–0.87)0.69 (0.51–0.93)
0.68 (0.56–0.83)0.64 (0.35–1.16)
0.65 (0.44–0.95)0.69 (0.56–0.86)
0.78 (0.57–1.06)0.64 (0.50–0.81)
0.76 (0.59–0.99)0.61 (0.47–0.80)
0.67 (0.49–0.91)0.63 (0.48–0.84)0.91 (0.57–1.44)
0.57 (0.41–0.81)0.83 (0.61–1.14)0.67 (0.49–0.93)
0.60 (0.44–0.81)0.76 (0.55–1.06)0.73 (0.52–1.04)
0.72 (0.52–1.00)0.63 (0.46–0.88)0.71 (0.51–0.98)
0.67 (0.47–0.94)0.71 (0.52–0.97)0.69 (0.50–0.94)
0.66 (0.47–0.91)0.73 (0.53–1.01)0.68 (0.49–0.93)
Key Secondary Endpoint: Subgroups – USACV Death, MI, Stroke
Risk CategorySecondary PreventionPrimary Prevention
0.41133/908 (14.6%)54/640 (8.4%)
0.66 (0.53–0.82)0.78 (0.55–1.12)
198/942 (21.0%)68/656 (10.4%)
Subgroup HR (95% CI) IntP Val
Placebon/N (%)
Icosapent Ethyln/N (%)
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
Bhatt DL, Miller M, Brinton EA, et al. Circulation. 2019. Bhatt DL. AHA 2019, Philadelphia.
21
22
2/27/2020
12
Years since Randomization
All
-Cau
se M
ort
alit
y R
ate
(%)
1 2 3 4 500
8
16
18
14
12
10
6
4
2
All-Cause Mortality: USA Subgroupby CV Risk Category
Icosapent Ethyl
Bhatt DL. AHA 2019, Philadelphia.
Secondary Prevention Primary Prevention
Years since RandomizationA
ll-C
ause
Mo
rtal
ity
Rat
e (%
)
1 2 3 4 500
8
16
18
14
12
10
6
4
2
Hazard Ratio, 0.71
RRR = 29%(95% CI, 0.53–0.94)
RRR = 31%
Hazard Ratio, 0.69(95% CI, 0.44–1.09)
Icosapent Ethyl
Placebo
Placebo
Note: The curves were visually truncated at 5.7 yearsbecause a limited number of events occurred beyond that time point; all patient data were included in the analyses.
85
87
394
204
Placebo [N=1598]
Nu
mb
er
of
Pri
mar
y C
om
po
sit
e E
nd
po
int
Eve
nts
Icosapent Ethyl [N=1548]
4949
281
2nd EventsHR 0.63
(95% CI, 0.52-0.76)
1st EventsHR 0.69
(95% CI, 0.59-0.80) P=0.000001
≥4 EventsRR 0.56
(95% CI, 0.40-0.80)
3rd EventsHR 0.63
(95% CI, 0.49-0.80)-36
-113
-81
No. ofFewerCases
800
600
400
200
0
300
500
700
100
-268
-38
770
502
123
3rd1st 2nd ≥4Full Dataset Event No.
First and Subsequent Events: USA Full Dataset
Note: WLW method for the 1st events, 2nd events, and 3rd events categories;Negative binomial model for ≥4th events and overall treatment comparison.
RR 0.64(95% CI, 0.54-0.77)
P=0.00000236% Reduction in Total Events
Bhatt DL, Miller M, Brinton EA, et al. Circulation. 2019. Bhatt DL. AHA 2019, Philadelphia.
23
24
2/27/2020
13
Icosapent Ethyl (N=1548)
Placebo(N=1598) P-value
Subjects with at Least One TEAE, n (%) 1354 (87.5) 1387 (86.8) 0.59
Severe TEAE 436 (28.2) 458 (28.7) 0.78
Drug-Related TEAE 188 (12.1) 183 (11.5) 0.58
Serious TEAE 533 (34.4) 571 (35.7) 0.46
Drug-Related Serious TEAE 5 (0.3) 2 (0.1) 0.28
TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Study Drug 145 (9.4) 170 (10.6) 0.26
Drug-Related TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Study Drug 56 (3.6) 75 (4.7) 0.15
Serious TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Study Drug 31 (2.0) 48 (3.0) 0.09
Serious TEAE Leading to Death 36 (2.3) 53 (3.3) 0.11
Drug-Related Serious TEAE Leading to Withdrawal of Study Drug 1 (0.1) 2 (0.1) >0.99
• Tolerability and safety findings were consistent with the full study population
• The tolerability and safety virtually identical to placebo; no significant differences in the overall rates of TEAEs or serious TEAEs
• A significant increase in minor bleeding (16.7% vs 13.6%, p=0.02), but no significant excess in serious adverse events related to bleeding
• There was a significant increase in the overall TEAE rate of atrial fibrillation or flutter (6.6% vs 4.5%, p=0.012), but not in either the category of serious adverse events of atrial fibrillation or flutter, or the adjudicated endpoint of hospitalization ≥24 hours for atrial fibrillation or flutter
Safety Summary: USA SubgroupTreatment Emergent Adverse Events in the Safety Population
Bhatt DL, Miller M, Brinton EA, et al. Circulation. 2019. Bhatt DL. AHA 2019, Philadelphia.
-100
-150
-200
-50
0
Ris
k D
iffe
ren
ce
vs
. P
lac
eb
o TotalMortality
-34
Hospitalizationfor Unstable
Angina
-26
PrimaryCompositeEndpoint
-204
CardiovascularDeath
-27
Fatal orNonfatal MI
-43Fatal orNonfatalStroke
-21
CoronaryRevascularization
-88
For Every 1000 Patients in the USA Treated with Icosapent Ethyl 4g/day for 5 Years
Bhatt DL, Miller M, Brinton EA, et al. Circulation. 2019. Bhatt DL. AHA 2019, Philadelphia.
25
26
2/27/2020
14
• Compared with placebo, in the USA patients, icosapent ethyl 4 grams per day resulted in statistically significant:
• 31% reductions in the primary and key secondary endpoints
• 28% to 47% reductions in all prespecified hierarchical testing endpoints
• 36% reduction in total events, including a 37% reduction in second events, a 37% reduction in third events, and a 44% reduction in 4th or more events
• 30% relative risk reduction and 2.6% absolute risk reduction in all-cause mortality
Conclusions: USA Subgroup
Bhatt DL, Miller M, Brinton EA, et al. Circulation. 2019. Bhatt DL. AHA 2019, Philadelphia.
We thank the investigators, the study coordinators, and the 3,146 USA patients who participated in REDUCE-IT!
27
28
2/27/2020
15
CIRCULATION. 2019; [PUBLISHED ONLINE AHEAD OF PRINT]. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044440.
REDUCE‐IT USA: RESULTS FROM THE 3,146 PATIENTS RANDOMIZED IN THE UNITED STATES
DEEPAK L. BHATT, MD, MPH, FAHA; MICHAEL MILLER, MD; ELIOT A. BRINTON, MD; TERRY A. JACOBSON, MD; PH. GABRIEL STEG, MD; STEVEN B. KETCHUM, PHD; RALPH T. DOYLE, JR., BA; REBECCA A. JULIANO, PHD; LIXIA JIAO, PHD; CRAIG GRANOWITZ, MD, PHD;
JEAN‐CLAUDE TARDIF, MD; BRIAN OLSHANSKY, MD; MINA K. CHUNG, MD; C. MICHAEL GIBSON, MS, MD; ROBERT P. GIUGLIANO, MD, SM; MATTHEW J. BUDOFF, MD; CHRISTIE M. BALLANTYNE, MD; ON BEHALF OF THE REDUCE‐IT INVESTIGATORS*
CIRCULATION
HTTPS://WWW.AHAJOURNALS.ORG/DOI/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044440
Analysis
Average Total Cost, 2018 USD Average QALY GainedICER,
2018 USD*
Icosapent Ethyl
Standard Care
DifferenceIcosapent Ethyl
Standard Care
Difference
In‐TrialBase Case $23,926 $24,563 ‐$637 3.34 3.27 0.07 DominantSensitivity
0% discount $27,576 $28,205 ‐$629 3.90 3.82 0.08 Dominant5% discount $21,837 $22,474 ‐$637 3.02 2.96 0.06 DominantWAC costing $29,684 $24,563 +$5121 3.34 3.27 0.07 $75,512Optum costs all patients $23,926 $35,690 ‐$11,764 3.34 3.27 0.07 Dominant
LifetimeBase Case $87,077 $88,912 ‐$1835 11.61 11.35 0.26 DominantScenarios
Best Case $85,493 $88,912 ‐$3419 11.73 11.35 0.38 DominantWorst Case $87,672 $88,912 ‐$1240 11.57 11.35 0.22 Dominant
Probabilistic Sensitivity $102,789 $104,804 ‐$2015 12.22 11.97 0.25 Dominant
Results: Costs, QALYs, and ICERs
Weintraub WS. AHA 2019, Philadelphia.
29
30
2/27/2020
16
FDA – November 14, 2019
• Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee• 16-0 Vote to Approve Label Expansion
31
32