Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

67
Redistricting, 2011 Expectations and Results

Transcript of Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Page 1: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Redistricting, 2011Expectations and Results

Page 2: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

What is Redistrictingdefinition

Redistricting is the process of drawing district lines. It is done every 10 years after the release of the US Census. The well known examples are Congress and the legislature.

Cities, Counties, School Boards, Water Boards… All elected bodies do redistricting.

Reapportionment is the process of assigning congressional seats to states.

Page 3: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

What is Redistricting?the Gerrymander

The term Gerrymander came from a cartoon depicting a rather serpentine looking district created by Governor Elbrige Gerry in Massachusetts.

Page 4: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

What is Redistrictingthe Gerrymander

There are still legislative linesthat look a lot likethe original Gerrymander!

Kevin DeLeon’s SD 22

Page 5: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

What is RedistrictingWhy should anyone care?

Page 6: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

What is RedistrictingWhy should anyone care?

Page 7: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

What is RedistrictingWhy should anyone care?

Page 8: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

What is RedistrictingWhy should anyone care?

In redistricting it isn’t always about Partisanship. It is often rural v. urban; different ethnicities, or other factors where winners and losers are found.

Page 9: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

What is RedistrictingFederal VRA and State CVRA

VRA is the Federal Voting Rights Act which oversees all election systems, including redistricting. Operative sections in redistricting are Section 2 and Section 5.

CVRA is the California Voting Rights Act – it pushes most at-large systems into districted elections based on an analysis of populations and voting patterns.

Page 10: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

What is RedistrictingSection 2 and Section 5

Section 2 of Federal Voting Rights Act protects majority-minority seats. As a result of recent cases, this must be a single majority with history of polarized voting

Section 5 looks specifically at counties and states with a history of unfair election practices. In California, Yuba, Monterey, Merced and Kings counties are under this section.

Page 11: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Proposition 11 / 20 PrinciplesPublic voted for a new system in California

The California redistricting experiment, if you believed the commercials, was supposed to achieve the following.

• Take the “power of the pen” away from incumbents• Create districts that made sense (circles and squares,

not the ribbon of shame)• Protect cities and counties from being divided• Make elections competitive again• Help reduce the dysfunction in Sacramento / DC• Take Politics out of the Process

Page 12: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Pre-Redraw DiscussionsThe Commission’s Great Unknown

Asian Districts? There were no Section 2 Asian seats in California. But could some be created?

AsianCVAP Asian

AD 49 (Eng) 39% 47%AD 12 (Ma) 43% 41%AD 20 (Weickowski) 36% 38%AD 22 (Fong) 33% 31%AD 23 (Campos) 26% 32%AD 68 (Mansoor) 25% 30%

Page 13: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Asian Districts? There were no Section 2 Asian seats in California. But could some be created?

AsianCVAP Asian

SD 8 (Yee) 32%34%

SD 10 (Corbett) 30% 33%SD 13 (Alquist) 26% 29%

SD 24 (Hernandez) 18% 23%

Pre-Redraw DiscussionsThe Commission’s Great Unknown

Page 14: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Asian Districts? There were no Section 2 Asian seats in California. But could some be created?

AsianCVAP Asian

CD 8 (Pelosi) 29% 27%CD 12 (Speier) 29% 31%CD 13 (Stark) 28% 31%

CD 29 (Schiff) 24% 24%CD 47 (Sanchez) 14% 22%

Pre-Redraw DiscussionsThe Commission’s Great Unknown

Page 15: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Traditional Redistricting PrinciplesUsed by our Commission

The commission must follow many of these criteria, but cannot consider incumbents or partisan advantage.

• Relatively equal size - people, not citizens• Contiguous – districts should not hop/jump• Follow city/county/local government lines• Maintain communities of interest• Keep districts compact – appearance/function• Preserving voter choices (incumbents)

Page 16: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Traditional Redistricting PrinciplesUsed by our Commission

The commission must follow many of these criteria, but cannot consider incumbents or partisan advantage.

• Relatively equal size - people, not citizens• Contiguous – districts should not hop/jump• Follow city/county/local government lines• Maintain communities of interest• Keep districts compact – appearance/function• Preserving voter choices (incumbents)

Page 17: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Traditional Redistricting PrinciplesFrom decades of case law

There are a number of criteria that have been used nationally and upheld by courts.

• Relatively equal size - people, not citizens• Contiguous – districts should not hop/jump• Follow city/county/local government lines• Maintain communities of interest• Keep districts compact – appearance/function• Preserving voter choices (incumbents)

Page 18: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Current DistrictsEqual Size Districts

Page 19: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Traditional Redistricting PrinciplesUsed by our Commission

The commission must follow many of these criteria, but cannot consider incumbents or partisan advantage.

• Relatively equal size - people, not citizens• Contiguous – districts should not hop/jump• Follow city/county/local government lines• Maintain communities of interest• Keep districts compact – appearance/function• Preserving voter choices (incumbents)

Page 20: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Traditional Redistricting PrinciplesUsed by our Commission

The commission must follow many of these criteria, but cannot consider incumbents or partisan advantage.

• Relatively equal size - people, not citizens• Contiguous – districts should not hop/jump• Follow city/county/local government lines• Maintain communities of interest• Keep districts compact – appearance/function• Preserving voter choices (incumbents)

Page 21: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Communities of InterestKeeping similar voters together

Generally thought of as:• Race / Ethnicity• Socioeconomic• Language• Religious

Page 22: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Communities of InterestKeeping similar voters together

Generally thought of as:• Race / Ethnicity• Socioeconomic• Language• Religious

Can also include:• Issues• Voting patterns• Workforce

Page 23: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Looking at State ChangesNew Commission

Organizations and individuals are drafting plans, and finding that it isn’t as easy as they thought!

Cook Political ReportCongressional Plan

Page 24: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Looking at State ChangesNew Commission

The biggest macro challenge is to balance Commission rules, the Voting Rights Act and community input.

Cook Political ReportCongressional Plan

Page 25: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Looking at State ChangesNew Commission

An area like this looked like a mess – and it seemed anyone could fix these districts.

Page 26: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Looking at State ChangesNew Commission

But the novices learned that the VRA locked in a number of these seemingly gerrymandered seats

Page 27: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Looking at State ChangesNew Commission

A big question surrounded how Asians would fare under the new VRA rules, particularly the need to create Majority Minority districts as one-race rather than coalitions.

Page 28: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Looking at State ChangesNew Commission

A big question surrounded how Asians would be able to have preferred seats drawn when when an overlapping Latino VRA claim could also be established.

Page 29: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Traditional Redistricting PrinciplesUsed by our Commission

The commission must follow many of these criteria, but cannot consider incumbents or partisan advantage.

• Relatively equal size - people, not citizens• Contiguous – districts should not hop/jump• Follow city/county/local government lines• Maintain communities of interest• Keep districts compact – appearance/function• Preserving voter choices (incumbents)

Page 30: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Traditional Redistricting PrinciplesBorne out of VRA and several federal lawsuits

Compact Not Compact

Page 31: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Traditional Redistricting PrinciplesUsed by our Commission

The commission must follow many of these criteria, but cannot consider incumbents or partisan advantage.

• Relatively equal size - people, not citizens• Contiguous – districts should not hop/jump• Follow city/county/local government lines• Maintain communities of interest• Keep districts compact – appearance/function• Preserving voter choices (incumbents)

Page 32: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Digging into VRAHow easy create more Asian seats?

Under Voting Rights Act a Majority – Minority Asian district must be created where:

• There is racially polarized voting.

• The ethnic group is large and compact enough to make 50% of a district.

• The lines can be drawn in accordance with traditional redistricting rules. Race not ONLY criteria.

Page 33: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Digging into VRAHow easy create more Asian seats?

Does Racially Polarized Voting exist in the Asian Community? There is not a simple answer.

• RPV exists groups have divergent voting patterns that can be proven statistically based on court-approved methods.

• This differs based on the types of candidates in a race, and the region of the state.

Page 34: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation
Page 35: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation
Page 36: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Where Asian RPV is clear

Page 37: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation
Page 38: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation
Page 39: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Where Asian RPV is clear

Page 40: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Where Asian RPV is clear

Page 41: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Where Asian RPV is clear

Page 42: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Where Asian RPV is not clear

Does this evidence in LA mean that there is Racially Polarized Voting in California for and against Asians?

• Can be muddied by Party Affiliation – More Latinos in the SGV voted for Chaing than Asians

• Differs by region of the state.

Page 43: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Asian Density

Page 44: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Yee for Assembly 2010 Primary

Page 45: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Asian Density

Page 46: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Hayashi for Judge

Page 47: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Asian Density

Page 48: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Where Asian RPV is less clear2006 Democratic Primary Controller – Dunn v. ChiangThe 2006 Dem Primary pitted trial lawyer Joe Dunn from Orange County versus prosecutor John Chiang from Los Angeles. White voters favored Chiang by 16%, with Asian voters favoring Chiang by the slightly larger margin of 24%

Page 49: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Digging into VRAHow easy create more Asian seats?

Under Voting Rights Act a Majority – Minority Asian district must be created where:

• There is racially polarized voting.

• The ethnic group is large and compact enough to make 50% of a district.

• The lines can be drawn in accordance with traditional redistricting rules. Race not ONLY criteria.

Page 50: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Digging into VRAHow easy create more Asian seats?

Under Voting Rights Act a Majority – Minority Asian district must be created where:

• There is racially polarized voting.

• The ethnic group is large and compact enough to make 50% of a district.

• The lines can be drawn in accordance with traditional redistricting rules. Race not ONLY criteria.

Page 51: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Proposition 11 / 20 OutcomesWhat we know for now…

The impact of Prop 11 and 20 are far and wide, independent of whether the goals of the TV Commercials was met.

• Most anti-incumbent redistricting in history.

• Creates one-time competition even if without long-term competitiveness

• Changed public and lawmaker expectations – both down to local government and nationally.

Page 52: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Proposition 11 / 20 OutcomesPartisan and Ethnic Breakdown

Assembly Senate Congress

Dem 48 24 33

GOP 21 11 12

Swing Seats 11 5 8

African American 0 0 0

Latino 15 5 9

Asian 1 0 0

Page 53: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Asian Districts? There were no Section 2 Asian seats in California. But could some be created?

AsianCVAP Asian

SD 8 32%34%

SD 10 30%33%

SD 13 26%29%

SD 24 18%23%

Are things better today than Four Months Ago?

Proposition 11 / 20 Outcomes

Page 54: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Asian Districts? There were no Section 2 Asian seats in California. But could some be created?

AsianCVAP Asian

SD 10 40%33%

SD 22 32%31%

SD 11 36%31%

SD 15 30%25%

Are things better today than Four Months Ago?

Proposition 11 / 20 Outcomes

Page 55: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Asian Districts? There were no Section 2 Asian seats in California. But could some be created?

AsianCVAP Asian

CD 8 29%27%

CD 12 29%31%

CD 13 28%31%

CD 29 24% 24%

CD 47 14% 22%

Are things better today than Four Months Ago?

Proposition 11 / 20 Outcomes

Page 56: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Asian Districts? There were no Section 2 Asian seats in California. But could some be created?

AsianCVAP Asian

CD 17 49%38%

CD 27 37%31%

CD 14 31%28%

CD 12 31% 27%

CD 19 26% 25%

Are things better today than Four Months Ago?

Proposition 11 / 20 Outcomes

Page 57: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Are things better today than Four Months Ago?

Asian Districts? There were no Section 2 Asian seats in California. But could some be created?

AsianCVAP Asian

AD 49 39%47%

AD 12 43%41%

AD 20 36%38%

AD 22 33%31%

AD 23 26%32%

AD 68 25%30%

Proposition 11 / 20 Outcomes

Page 58: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Are things better today than Four Months Ago?

Asian Districts? There were no Section 2 Asian seats in California. But could some be created?

AsianCVAP Asian

AD 49 53%50%

AD 19 44%39%

AD 25 49%39%

AD 27 33%34%

AD 20 31%28%

AD 72 32%28%

Proposition 11 / 20 Outcomes

Page 59: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Are things better today than Four Months Ago?

Asian Districts? There were no Section 2 Asian seats in California. But could some be created?

AsianCVAP Asian

AD 49 53%50%

AD 19 44%39%

AD 25 49%39%

AD 27 33%34%

AD 20 31%28%

AD 72 32%28%

Proposition 11 / 20 Outcomes

Page 60: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

These overarching numbers provide a comparison point, but what does it mean for elected API officials and campaigns in the next decade?

Are things better today than Four Months Ago?

Proposition 11 / 20 Outcomes

Page 61: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

These overarching numbers provide a comparison point, but what does it mean for elected API officials and campaigns in the next decade?

There are two streams:

• Better API seats provide numeric advantages.

• Greater API opportunity comes in non-Asian districts too.

Are things better today than Four Months Ago?

Proposition 11 / 20 Outcomes

Page 62: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Proposition 11 / 20 OutcomesHandouts provide a very detailed look

Page 63: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Proposition 11 / 20 OutcomesHandouts provide a very detailed look

Page 64: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Proposition 11 / 20 OutcomesHandouts provide a very detailed look

Page 65: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Proposition 11 / 20 OutcomesHandouts provide a very detailed look

Page 66: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation

Will these lines stick?Referendums and lawsuits appear moving

A court battle is the eventual end to any high-stakes redistricting.

• Referendum appears to be moving against Senate lines while congressional effort is dead.

• Lawsuits moving on both Senate and Congressional.

• Congressional lawsuit is the most interesting.

Page 67: Redistricting 2011: Expectations and Results Presentation