Recruitment and Remuneration of Phase I Subjects€¦ · Recruitment and Remuneration of Phase I...
Transcript of Recruitment and Remuneration of Phase I Subjects€¦ · Recruitment and Remuneration of Phase I...
Recruitment and Remuneration of Phase I Subjects
May 14, 2014
Presented by:Theresa Cummings RN, MSSchulman Associates IRB
About Schulman Associates IRB
Established in 1983
US and Canadian boards fully accredited by the
Association for the Accreditation of Human Research
Protection Programs (AAHRPP)
Superior audit history with FDA—five consecutive audits
with no findings.
21 CFR Part 11 compliant electronic systems
Compliant with FDA, OHRP and Health Canada
requirements
About Schulman Associates IRB
Full board meetings five days a week
Dedicated daily expedited review of qualifying minimal
risk protocols
Phase I Board with streamlined processes tailored to
Phase I timelines
Oncology Review Board for all phases of oncology
research
Customized services for institutions and AMCs
Experienced primary points of contact for sponsors,
CROs, institutions and sites
About Schulman Associates IRB
Clinical Quality Assurance (CQA) and Human Research
Protection (HRP) consulting services provided by
Provision Research Compliance Services
www.provisionrcs.com
Provision is a joint venture between
Schulman Associates IRB and Falcon Consulting Group
About Today’s Presenter
Theresa Cummings RN, MS
Schulman Associates IRB BS in Nursing from Georgetown University
MS in Nursing Education from University of
Maryland
Extensive experience on the operational side of
clinical research
• CCRC in CNS phase I-III trials for 4 years
• Clinic Director for over 12 years for several
Phase I clinics
Joined Schulman Associates in early 2013
Objectives of this webinar include:
Review regulatory guidelines and their application when recruiting subjects into Phase I trials
Differentiate between clinical practice and research
Review principle of Justice as it relates to recruitment of subjects
Review regulatory guidelines and their application when paying subjects for participating in a Phase I trials
Introduction to Recruitment and Remuneration
Two key regulations govern how advertising and
recruiting of subjects can occur
• 21 CFR 56.111(a)(3)
• 45 CFR 46.111(a)
These regulations outline expectations of sites involved
in the conduct of research as well as IRBs overseeing
research.
The IRB is your experienced guide to help ensure
these regulations are followed.
Recruitment of Phase I Subjects/Volunteers
Clinical Practice refers to interventions that are
designed with the sole purpose of enhancing
well-being and has a reasonable expectation of
success.1
Physicians swear to follow the Hippocratic Oath
and uphold the ethical principles of beneficence
and non-maleficence – ensuring benefits of care
outweigh the possible burdens.
Purpose of Clinical Practice
1. Extracted from the Belmont Report
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html#xbound
Research is an activity designed to test a hypothesis, permit conclusion to be drawn and thereby develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.1
Phase I research specifically:
• Conduct tests on a molecule to establish safety and tolerability data using study designs such as MTD, QT studies, DDI studies and Food effect studies.
• Generally conducted in Healthy Normal Volunteers (HNV), although more and more studies are designed with a patient arm or include a limited subset of patients.
Purpose of Research
1. Extracted from the Belmont Report
http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html#xbound
Therapeutic Misconception – occurs “when a research
subject fails to appreciate the distinction between the
imperative of clinical research and of ordinary
treatment and therefore inaccurately attributes
therapeutic intent to research procedures.”1
Similarities and Differences
(1) Clinical Trials and Medical Care: Defining the Therapeutic Misconception
Gail E. Henderson, Larry R. Churchill, Arlene M. Davis, Michele M. Easter, Christine
Grady, Steven Joffe, Nancy Kass, Nancy M. P. King, Charles W. Lidz, Franklin G. Miller,
Daniel K. Nelson, Jeffrey Peppercorn, Barbra Bluestone Rothschild, Pamela Sankar,
Benjamin S. Wilfond, Catherine R. Zimmer
PLoS Med. 2007;4(11):e324
When the form is signed?
At the time the ad is placed?
When the subject arrives at the clinic?
When the phone rings in the recruitment center?
When Does Consent Begin?
Advertising methods for a single study should be spread across a diverse platform to ensure equal opportunity exists for all to be exposed to the ads and respond. If only the internet will be used, you will exclude opportunity to many.
Belmont Report emphasizes fairness in distribution of burden and benefit of research.
Principle of Justice & the Belmont Report
Key direct advertising modalities include
• Newspaper, radio, TV, flyer, bulletin board postings
• Database e-blasts and warm calls
• Social media outlets (Twitter, web pages, Facebook)
Key with social media: same rules apply. Cannot place undue
influence on a person or emphasize the stipend in the
recruitment materials.
Use of testimonials in advertising: does it provide information
that prospective subjects need to determine their eligibility and
level of interest?
How Can You Recruit for Phase I HNV and Patient Populations?
When you want to consider something outside
the box to facilitate recruitment, communication
and providing the context of the concept under
consideration is key.
• Context memo
• Consultation /draft review
Communication with IRB Is Key
Do’s• Include name and address of the
facility and/or PI
• Indicate the condition under study
• List participation benefits (if any)
• Time and other commitment
requirements
• Whom to contact for more
information
• Keep size and type of font the
same throughout the ad
Print Advertising (Flyers, Ads, Web Postings, etc.)
Don’ts• Advertise “Free Medical
Treatment”
• Use terms such as “New
Medication” or “New Treatment”
without explaining it as
investigational
• Explicitly or implicitly claim the
drug is safe or effective or
equivalent or superior to any other
drug
• Use misleading language
• Highlight payment – flashing $$
Internal databases – characterize individuals who call-in on numerous data points (age, gender, medical history, etc.) in response to an ad to establish eligibility for a specific study or for future consideration.
The more sensitive the information being loaded into the database, the tighter the site’s procedures must be to protect human subjects.• What happens if a caller hangs up?• Names of non-eligible stored for later?• Paper notes – shred or store?
Use of Internal Databases for Recruitment
External databases – from pharmacies or
purchased mailing lists limit recruitment efforts
to a much more narrow focus (only those taking
metformin, for example).
• Materials being mailed to subjects must be IRB approved
Use of External Databases for Recruitment
Development of a program to expand database must
be described in detail for IRB consideration as part of
review of generic recruitment materials.
• Lunch and Learn concept
• Free giveaways for those who attend or complete database form
Generalized Database Expansion Is Possible
Private Practice Physicians CAN serve as a consultant
on a study (for the site or the sponsor) and get paid
for these services (or other bona fide professional
services). They can also refer their patients to
participate in a study.
Private Practice Physicians CANNOT get paid a fee
SOLELY for the referral.
Physician Involvement in Research
Consultant vs. Sub-Investigator
• If they will be conducting study related procedures
that support an endpoint of the study, sub-investigator
is the safest route to take (i.e. Lumbar puncture for
collection of CSF for Pharmacokinetic evaluation).
• If they will be treating emergent side effects that may
or may not ever occur then consult would make more
sense (i.e. Dermatologic exam of a rash or liver
biopsy and w/u for a DILI).
Physician as Sub-Investigator
Payment of a stipend is NOT considered a benefit of
participation in a research trial.
Payment of a stipend for participation IS considered
a recruitment incentive.
Payment of a stipend CANNOT be coercive or present
undue influence on a person to say yes to the
research.
Remuneration of Phase I Subjects
Time and Inconvenience
• Removing the individual from their daily
routine & confinement for a period of
time – sometimes extended
• Prohibiting them from earning money in
another way
• Restricting access to certain things
(smoking, alcohol, etc)
• Requiring certain dietary limitations
(high fat, low fat, no grapefruit, etc.)
What Are You Paying For?
Study specific procedures
• Cannot pay extra to the arm of the study getting
IV dosing vs. SQ or PO dosing
• Cannot call out payment for “high risk” procedures
(muscle biopsy or lumbar puncture as examples)
What Are You Not Paying For?
Should be avoided if possible in Phase I research.
Follow due diligence in your planning stages to ensure
your initial submission includes stipend amounts that
are commensurate with the effort you think it will take
to recruit the study.
Very few “do-overs” in Phase I for recalculation of
stipend later if recruitment is suffering.
Alteration of Stipend Amounts After IRB Approval
FDA is accepting of study completion payments;
HOWEVER, the amount must be reasonable and not
unduly influence subjects to stay in the study when they
otherwise would have withdrawn.
IRB Considerations:
• Ideal to accrue payment, even completion bonuses
• IC must be reflective of amount and distribution plan
• Interim payments are acceptable and standard for studies of long duration
Study Completion Payments
Transportation• Airfare
• Taxi vouchers
• Pay for mileage
Housing outside of protocol requirements• Extended stay in the clinic for logistic reasons (other than
safety concerns)
• Hotel room nearby – discounted rate
IRB considerations:• Offered to all subjects
• Communicated during initial submission
• What services will include (max. value of each)
Fair and Equitable Services Offered to All
Recruitment should focus on information subjects need to determine interest in this study and eligibility
Recruitment should be multifaceted and share benefit and burden of research to all
Recruitment methods may differ for Phase I studies and later phase studies
Remuneration amounts should be consistent and fair for time and inconvenience associated with participation
Communicate with your IRB
Conclusion