Record of Site Condition # 217470 Record of Site Condition Under ...
-
Upload
truongduong -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Record of Site Condition # 217470 Record of Site Condition Under ...
Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # 217470
Record of Site Condition
Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act
Summary
Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence
This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has
access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings
with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental
condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.
Contents of this Record of Site Condition
This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from
the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been
submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.
Record of Site Condition Number 217470Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2015/04/07Certification Date 2014/06/19Current Property Use CommercialIntended Property Use ResidentialCertificate of Property Use Number No CPUApplicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard,
with Non-potable Ground Water, for Residentialproperty use
Property Municipal Address 15 LAKE STREET, GRIMSBY, ON, L3M 2G4
1 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 217470 on 2015/04/07
PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS
Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC
Owner Name 1671229 ONTARIO INC.
Authorized Person DONATO COLANGELO
Mailing Address 7094 YORK DRIVE, NIAGARA FALLSONTARIO, CANADA
Postal Code L3C 7A3
Phone (905) 945-5284
Fax
Email Address [email protected]
2 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 217470 on 2015/04/07
RSC Property Location Information
Municipal Address(es) 15 LAKE STREET, GRIMSBY, ON L3M 2G4
Municipality Grimsby
Legal Description See Attached Lawyer’s Letter
Assessment Roll Number(s)
2615010001262000000
Property Identifier Number(s)
46016-0362 (LT)
RSC Property Geographical References
Coordinate System UTM
Datum NAD 83
Zone 17
Easting 617,658.00
Northing 4,784,402.00
RSC Property Use Information
The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use.
Current Property Use Commercial
Intended Property Use Residential
Certificate of Property Use has been issued under section 168.6 of the EPA
No
3 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 217470 on 2015/04/07
Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC
The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank
4 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 217470 on 2015/04/07
PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON’S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONSQualified Person's Information
Name PATRICK SHRINER
Type of Membership Under the Professional Geoscientists Act
Practising Member
Membership Number 0407
QP Employer Name AMEC AMERICAS LIMITED
Mailing Address 5, 3300 MERRITTVILLE HIGHWAY, THOROLDONTARIO, L2V 4Y6 CANADA
Phone (905) 687-6616
Fax (905) 687-6620
Email Address [email protected]
Municipal Information
Local or Single-Tier Municipality
Grimsby
Upper-Tier Municipality Niagara
Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change District Office
District Office Niagara District Office
District Office Address 9th floor, 301 St. Paul St., St. Catharines ON L2R 3M8
5 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 217470 on 2015/04/07
Phase One Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing
The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)
(YYYY/MM/DD)
2015-03-19
Type of Report
Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)
Author of Report
Name of ConsultingCompany
P1 ESA Phase One Environmental Site Assessment North End of 15 Lake Street Grimsby, Ontario
2013-08-06 Patrick Shriner, P.Geo., Cassandra Johnston
AMEC AMERICAS LIMITED
P1 ESA Update
Update Phase One Environmental Site Assessment North End of 15 Lake Street, Grimsby, Ontario
2015-03-24 Patrick Shriner, P.Geo., Cassandra Johnston
AMEC AMERICAS LIMITED
Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment
Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)
Author of Report
Name of ConsultingCompany
N/A
6 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 217470 on 2015/04/07
Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing
The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)
(YYYY/MM/DD)
2014-06-19
Type of Report
Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)
Author of Report
Name of ConsultingCompany
P2 ESA Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment North End of 15 Lake Street Grimsby, Ontario
2014-08-06 Patrick Shriner, P.Geo., Kelly Patterson
AMEC AMERICAS LIMITED
Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment
Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD).
Author of Report
Name of ConsultingCompany
N/A
7 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 217470 on 2015/04/07
Environmental ConditionSection 41 applies? No
Section 43.1 applies? Yes
Site Condition InformationCertification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2014/06/19
Total area of RSC property (in hectares) 0.35000
Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property
Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property
Soil Texture
Assessment/Restoration Approach Full Depth Generic
Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water? Yes
Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04?
Yes
Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under the property which is used in the RSC?
Yes
Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or sediment
PARACEL LABORATORIES LTD.
Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Non-potable
Applicable Site Condition Standard TABLE 9
Local or single-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2015/03/10
Upper-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2015/03/10
8 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 217470 on 2015/04/07
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
1 Acenaphthene < 0.02 0.072 µg/g
2 Acenaphthylene 0.03 0.093 µg/g
3 Anthracene 0.03 0.22 µg/g
4 Benz[a]anthracene 0.11 0.36 µg/g
5 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.11 0.3 µg/g
6 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.17 0.47 µg/g
7 Benzo[ghi]perylene 0.03 0.68 µg/g
8 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.07 0.48 µg/g
9 Chrysene 0.13 2.8 µg/g
10 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.02 0.1 µg/g
11 Fluoranthene 0.2 0.69 µg/g
12 Fluorene < 0.02 0.19 µg/g
13 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene 0.04 0.23 µg/g
14 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < 0.02 0.59 µg/g
15 Naphthalene < 0.02 0.09 µg/g
16 Phenanthrene 0.1 0.69 µg/g
17 Pyrene 0.17 1 µg/g
18 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 7 25 µg/g
19 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 4 10 µg/g
20 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 < 8 240 µg/g
21 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < 8 120 µg/g
22 Bromodichloromethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
23 Bromoform < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
24 Dibromochloromethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
25 Benzene < 0.02 0.02 µg/g
26 Ethylbenzene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
27 Toluene < 0.05 0.2 µg/g
28 Xylene Mixture < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
29 Acetone < 0.5 0.5 µg/g
30 Bromomethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
31 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
32 Chlorobenzene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
33 Chloroform < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
34 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
35 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
...Continued on next page
9 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 217470 on 2015/04/07
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil
Continued from previous page....
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
36 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
37 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
38 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
39 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
40 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
41 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
42 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
43 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
44 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
45 Ethylene dibromide < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
46 Hexane (n) < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
47 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 0.5 0.5 µg/g
48 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 0.5 0.5 µg/g
49 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
50 Methylene Chloride < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
51 Styrene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
52 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
53 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
54 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
55 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
56 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
57 Trichloroethylene < 0.05 0.05 µg/g
58 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.05 0.25 µg/g
59 Vinyl Chloride < 0.02 0.02 µg/g
60 Boron (Hot Water Soluble)* 0.7 1.5 µg/g
61 Chromium VI 0.4 0.66 µg/g
62 Cyanide (CN-) < 0.05 0.051 µg/g
63 Electrical Conductivity 0.468 0.7 mS/cm
64 Mercury < 0.1 0.27 µg/g
65 Sodium Adsorption Ratio 0.48 5
66 Antimony 1.3 1.3 µg/g
67 Arsenic 6.9 18 µg/g
68 Selenium < 1 1.5 µg/g
69 Barium 136 220 µg/g
70 Beryllium < 1 2.5 µg/g
...Continued on next page
10 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 217470 on 2015/04/07
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards
Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil
Continued from previous page....
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
71 Boron (total) 13.6 36 µg/g
72 Cadmium 1 1.2 µg/g
73 Chromium Total 32.8 70 µg/g
74 Cobalt 10.6 22 µg/g
75 Copper 46.5 92 µg/g
76 Lead 58.4 120 µg/g
77 Molybdenum < 1 2 µg/g
78 Nickel 22.4 82 µg/g
79 Silver < 0.5 0.5 µg/g
80 Thallium < 1 1 µg/g
81 Uranium < 1 2.5 µg/g
82 Vanadium 34.4 86 µg/g
83 Zinc 245 290 µg/g
11 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 217470 on 2015/04/07
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)
Ground Water
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
1 Bromodichloromethane < 0.5 67000 µg/L
2 Bromoform < 0.5 380 µg/L
3 Dibromochloromethane < 0.5 65000 µg/L
4 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 25 420 µg/L
5 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 100 150 µg/L
6 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 < 100 500 µg/L
7 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 < 100 500 µg/L
8 Sodium 762,000 1800000 µg/L
9 Benzene < 0.5 44 µg/L
10 Ethylbenzene < 0.5 1800 µg/L
11 Toluene < 0.5 14000 µg/L
12 Xylene Mixture < 0.5 3300 µg/L
13 Acetone < 5 100000 µg/L
14 Bromomethane < 0.5 5.6 µg/L
15 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.2 0.79 µg/L
16 Chlorobenzene < 0.5 500 µg/L
17 Chloroform < 0.5 2.4 µg/L
18 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.5 4600 µg/L
19 Dichlorobenzene, 1,3- < 0.5 7600 µg/L
20 Dichlorobenzene, 1,4- < 0.5 8 µg/L
21 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 1 3500 µg/L
22 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.5 320 µg/L
23 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L
24 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L
25 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L
26 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L
27 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.5 16 µg/L
28 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.5 5.2 µg/L
29 Ethylene dibromide < 0.2 0.25 µg/L
30 Hexane (n) < 1 51 µg/L
31 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 5 470000 µg/L
32 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 5 140000 µg/L
33 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 2 190 µg/L
34 Methylene Chloride < 5 610 µg/L
35 Styrene < 0.5 1300 µg/L
...Continued on next page
12 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 217470 on 2015/04/07
Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)
Ground Water
Continued from previous page....
ContaminantName
Maximum Concentration
Applicable Site Condition Standard
Unit of Measure
36 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.5 3.3 µg/L
37 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.5 3.2 µg/L
38 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.5 1.6 µg/L
39 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.5 640 µg/L
40 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.5 4.7 µg/L
41 Trichloroethylene < 0.5 1.6 µg/L
42 Trichlorofluoromethane < 1 2000 µg/L
43 Vinyl Chloride < 0.5 0.5 µg/L
44 Barium 613 23000 µg/L
45 Beryllium < 0.5 53 µg/L
46 Boron (total) 534 36000 µg/L
47 Cadmium < 0.1 2.1 µg/L
48 Chromium Total 17 640 µg/L
49 Cobalt 4.2 52 µg/L
50 Copper 2.4 69 µg/L
51 Lead 0.1 20 µg/L
52 Molybdenum 12.8 7300 µg/L
53 Nickel 9 390 µg/L
54 Silver < 0.1 1.2 µg/L
55 Thallium < 0.1 400 µg/L
56 Uranium 4.2 330 µg/L
57 Vanadium 25 200 µg/L
58 Zinc 57 890 µg/L
59 Antimony < 0.5 16000 µg/L
60 Arsenic 25 1500 µg/L
61 Selenium 18 50 µg/L
13 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 217470 on 2015/04/07
Remedial Action and Mitigation
Remediated Soils
Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.
Soil Remediation Process Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³)
Description of Remediation
Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property.
Off-site removal to Niagara Waste Systems Limited, Welland landfill (MOECC licensed) on May 20, 23 and 26, 2014 of 587 m3 of metals, electrical conductivity, available boron and PHC impacted soils.
Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned
Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.
Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³) 587.0
Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³)
Soil Brought to the Property
Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A.
Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property(in-ground volume in m³)
14 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 217470 on 2015/04/07
Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures
Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing.
Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date.
Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.
Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres)
15 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 217470 on 2015/04/07
Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures
Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.
Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.
Monitoring or Maintenance
Soil Management Measures
Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.
Ground Water Management Measures
Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.
Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From Near Property Boundary
Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation?
Yes
16 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 217470 on 2015/04/07
Qualified Person’s Statements and CertificationsAs the qualified person, I certify that:
A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary.
As of 2014/06/19, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC.
Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.
I have, within the six months immediately before the submission of this record of site condition, given written notice of intention to apply non-potable ground water site condition standards to the clerk of the local municipality in which the property is located and the clerk of any upper-tier municipality in which the property is located.
As of 2014/06/19, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 37 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment.
As of 2014/06/19, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards.
I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.
I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.
I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry.
The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.
I do not hold and have not held and my employer AMEC AMERICAS LIMITEDdoes not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessmentor risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based
To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSCare true as of 2014/06/19.
By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.
By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, PATRICK SHRINER, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2015/03/26:
a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition.
I Agree
17 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 217470 on 2015/04/07
Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or AgentThe following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Changeas part of the record of site condition
Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner
Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property
Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired
A Current plan of Survey
A copy of No Objection Statement from municipality
Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern
Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property
Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model
Owner or agent certification statements
6.1.2
18 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 217470 on 2015/04/07
19 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 217470 on 2015/04/07
1
Shriner, Patrick D
From: Bob LeRoux <[email protected]>Sent: March-11-15 9:12 AMTo: Patterson, KellyCc: Wolowidnek, Tracy; Shriner, Patrick DSubject: RE: Non-Potable Ground Water Standards - 15 Lake Street, Grimsby
The Town has no objections to using non potable ground water stds. – subject to clearance by the Region of Niagara. From: Patterson, Kelly [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: March-10-15 1:34 PM To: Bob LeRoux Cc: Wolowidnek, Tracy; Shriner, Patrick D; Patterson, Kelly Subject: Non-Potable Ground Water Standards - 15 Lake Street, Grimsby Hi Bob, We sent a request to the Town on July 31, 2014 to use non‐potable ground water standards at the property located at 15 Lake Street in Grimsby and received a response from the Town August 1, 2014 (attached). The RSC is in the process of being accepted but the notification date in AMEC’s original letter request is greater than 6 months old and therefore the email response needs to be revised (as required by O. Reg. 153/04). Are you able to update the date in the no objections letter and re‐issue? Your earliest response would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Kelly Kelly Patterson, B.Sc. Environmental Scientist Amec Foster Wheeler plc 3300 Merrittville Hwy Unit 5 Thorold, Ontario, L2V 4Y6 Office: 905-687-6616 Cell: 905-329-5925 Email: [email protected] amecfw.com
This message is the property of Amec Foster Wheeler plc and/or its subsidiaries and/or affiliates and is intended only for the named recipient(s). Its contents (including any attachments) may be confidential, legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure by law. Unauthorised use, copying, distribution or disclosure of any of it may be unlawful and is strictly prohibited. We assume no responsibility to persons other than the intended named recipient(s) and do not accept liability for any errors or omissions which are a result of email transmission. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply email to the sender and confirm that the original message and any attachments and copies have been destroyed and deleted from your system. This disclaimer applies to any and all messages originating from us and set out above. For Canada and the United States: If you believe this is an
Planning and Development Services 2201 St. David’s Road W, PO Box 1042, Thorold, ON L2V 4T7 Telephone: 905-685-4225 Toll-free: 1-800-263-7215 Fax: 905-641-5208 www.niagararegion.ca
VIA E-MAIL ONLY March 13, 2015 File: E.03.08.EN-14-033 Ms. Kelly Patterson, B.Sc. Environmental Scientist AMEC Foster Wheeler 3300 Merrittville Hwy., Unit 5 Thorold, ON L2V 4Y6 Dear Ms. Patterson: Re: Intention to Conduct a Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment Assuming a Non-Potable Ground Water Condition North End of 15 Lake Street
Town of Grimsby
This is in response to your July 31, 2014 notification of the intent to apply non-potable (Table 9) site condition standards in this project (Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment). Please note that there are two criteria upon which the Region can offer input regarding the use of non-potable standards as per O.Reg. 153/04 Sec 35(3) a, b:
(a) the property, and all other properties located, in whole or in part, within 250 metres of the boundaries of the property, are supplied by a municipal drinking water system, as defined in the Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002, and have no wells installed for the extraction of ground water;
(b) the property is either,
(i) not located in an area designated in a municipal official plan as a well-head protection area or other designation identified by the municipality for the protection of ground water, or
(ii) if it is located in such a designated area, the municipality has consented in writing
to the application of the non-potable ground water site condition standards in preparing a record of site condition for the property.
With regard to item (a), Development Services staff notes that municipal water services are available for the subject property and other properties within 250 metres of the subject site. Also, information provided with your request, which was obtained from the Ministry of the Environment’s well records map, indicates that wells in the vicinity of the subject property are monitoring wells installed in December 2013 by Amec and that there are no domestic water wells. With regard to item (b), the Region has not designated well-head protection areas or areas for the protection of ground water in its official plan. We note for your information, however, that
2
the subject property is located within an area identified by the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority (NPCA) through mapping prepared for the Drinking Water Source Protection Plan as a Highly Vulnerable Aquifer. We also note that the property site is adjacent to Foran’s Marine and is located near the lake and Forty Mile Creek, which are identified as Fish Habitat (Critical Type 1 and Fish Spawning Area) on the Regional Official Plan’s Core Natural Heritage Map. As a result, the use of non-potable (ground water) MOE Table 9 SCS is used for the purposes of Section 41 of O.Reg. 153/04 as amended. Accordingly, based on the above, the Region confirms that it does not object to the proposal to use Non-Potable Site Condition Standards for the subject property. If you have any questions or wish to discuss these comments, please contact me at extension 3379 or by e-mail. Sincerely,
Pat Busnello Senior Development Planner c: Jayme Campbell, P.Eng, Hydrogeologist/Engineer, NPCA L:\Michael-Shmulevitch\ City of St-Catharines\ 15 Lake Street (Foran's Marine) - EN \ Regional Comments - 15 Lake Street (Foran's Marine) - EN.docx
Table of Areas of Potential Environmental Concern –15 Lake Street, Grimsby, ON
*Potentially Contaminating Activity (PCA) described specifically for the Phase One Property with reference to the applicable item number in the Table of PotentiallyContaminating Activities provided in Schedule D of O. Reg. 153/04 as amended, where applicable.
PHCs – Petroleum Hydrocarbons.SAR – Sodium Adsorption Ratio.EC - Electrical Conductivity.VOC – Volatile Organic CompoundsBTEX – Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and XylenesPAHs - Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Area of PotentialEnvironmental
Concern (APEC)Location of APEC on Phase
One PropertyPotentially Contaminating
Activity (PCA)Location of PCA (on-
Site or off-Site)Contaminants of
Potential Concern
Media PotentiallyImpacted (GroundWater, Soil and/or
Sediment)
APEC-1: FormerInfilling Activities
Across the entire Phase TwoProperty.
30. Importation of Fill Material ofUnknown Quality.
On-Site(PCA-1)
PHCs, BTEX,VOCs, PAHsMetalsEC, SAR, Cyanide(free)
Soil and Ground Water
APEC-2: BoatMaintenance andRepair Shop
Southwest end of Phase TwoProperty. 10. Commercial Autobody Shops.
Off-Site(PCA-2)
PHCsVOCsBTEX
Soil andGround water
APEC-3:Underground StorageTank
Southwest end of the PhaseTwo Property
#28 – Gasoline and AssociatedProducts Storage in Fixed Tanks
Off-Site(PCA-3)
PHCsVOCsBTEX
Soil andGround water
Table of Current and Past Property Use of Phase One Property – 15 Lake Street, Grimsby, Ontario
Years Name of Owner Description ofProperty Use Property Use Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire
Insurance Plans, etc.
August 10, 1801 Abraham Nelles Agricultural AgriculturalBased on the chain of title, the Phase One Property appearedto be vacant land use.
March 7, 1881 Samuel Nelles Agricultural AgriculturalBased on the chain of title, the Phase One Property appearedto be vacant land use.
October 13, 1882 James Doran Agricultural AgriculturalBased on the chain of title, the Phase One Property appearedto be vacant land use.
March 4, 1891 Elizabeth Webster Agricultural AgriculturalBased on the chain of title, the Phase One Property appearedto be vacant land use.
March 3, 1902 Osric Neal Commercial CommercialBased on the chain of title, the Phase One Property appearedto be vacant land use.
September 26, 1905 John Hewitt Agricultural AgriculturalBased on the chain of title, the Phase One Property appearedto be vacant land use.
April 16, 1920 Edward and Elizabeth Hand Agricultural AgriculturalBased on the chain of title, the Phase One Property appearedto be vacant land use.
October 21, 1933 Edward Hand Agricultural AgriculturalBased on the chain of title and the 1934 air photo, the PhaseOne Property appeared to be vacant land use.
May 5, 1938 Edward Hand Agricultural AgriculturalBased on the chain of title and the 1934 air photo, the PhaseOne Property appeared to be vacant land use.
December 20, 1956 Grimsby Brick and Tile Limited (RoyCooke and Son Limited) Commercial Commercial
Based on the chain of title and the 1954 air photo, the PhaseOne Property appeared to be vacant land use.
July 24, 1958 John Charles Park Commercial CommercialBased on the chain of title and the 1954 air photo, the PhaseOne Property appeared to be vacant land use.
June 17, 1963 David Foran and Anne Foran Commercial CommercialBased on the chain of title and the 1965 air photo, the PhaseOne Property appeared to be vacant land use.
Table of Current and Past Property Use of Phase One Property – 15 Lake Street, Grimsby, Ontario
Years Name of Owner Description ofProperty Use Property Use Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire
Insurance Plans, etc.
November 19, 1969 D.I. Foran Marine Limited Commercial CommercialBased on the chain of title and the 1965 air photo, the PhaseOne Property appeared to be vacant land use.
May 11, 1984 Her Majesty the Queen – Canada Commercial CommercialBased on the chain of title and the 1975 and 1983 air photo,the Phase One Property appeared to be vacant land use.
February 2, 2001 1448124 Ontario Limited Commercial CommercialBased on the chain of title and the 1994, and 2002 air photo,the Phase One Property appeared to be vacant land use.
January 16, 2006 1671229 Ontario Inc. Commercial CommercialBased on the chain of title and the 2010 air photo, the PhaseOne Property appeared to be vacant land use.
The Phase Two CSM for 15 Lake Street, Grimsby is provided below:
Regulatory Requirement Phase Two Property Information
i. Areas where potentiallycontaminating activity hasoccurred, areas of potentialenvironmental concern andsubsurface structures andutilities that may affectcontaminant distribution andtransport.
The location of the Phase One and Two Property is shown in Figure 1. Based onthe findings of the Phase One ESA, APECs and PCAs are associated with thePhase Two Property (Figure 8) due to historical infilling across the entire PhaseTwo Property and the maintenance and repair facility with associated UST to thesouth of the Site (approximately 210 m south and associated with Foran’s Marine).
As discussed above, based on the findings of the Phase One ESA, PCAs andAPECs associated with the property are as follows (Figure 8):
- APEC/PCA #1 – Historic infilling;
- APEC/PCA #2 – Boat Maintenance and Repair; and
- APEC/PCA #3 – Current UST.
Subsurface features that may affect contaminant distribution at the Phase TwoProperty include inactive storm and sanitary sewers and an inactive water main atthe southwest end of the Phase Two Property as depicted on Figure 2. The relativewater level elevation ranged from 99.42 (BH/MW2) to 98.55 (BH/MW3) mAAD. Theinferred ground water flow within the native silty clay/clayey silt/sandy silt till isinferred to be to southeasterly (Figure 5).
No previous RSCs have been filed on this Phase Two Property. The RSC #s 45918and 45498 are registered on adjacent properties to the current Phase Two Property.
ii. Description and figuresillustrating the physicalsetting of the propertyincluding, stratigraphy,hydrogeologicalcharacteristics, depth tobedrock, depth to watertable, aspect related toSection 41 or 43.1 that applyto the property, areas wheresoil has been brought ontothe property, location of anyproposed buildings.
The stratigraphy at the Phase Two Property is depicted on the cross sections(Figures 3 and 4) and in general, the subsurface conditions consisted of fill materialconsisting of sand and gravel (BH/MW1) to depths of 0.7 mbgs or granular fill(TP100) to depths of 1.2 mbgs over sandy silt/silty sand with clay or silty clay/clayeysilt fill to depths ranging from 3.7 to 5.8 mbgs overlying native silty clay/clayeysilt/sandy silt till to depth. No deleterious materials were noted in the testpits orboreholes.
Visual or olfactory evidence of environmental impacts were not observed by AMECduring the testpitting and drilling programs.
COV and TOV concentration headspace measurements recorded in the soilsamples collected from the boreholes and testpits ranged from non-detectable to 50ppm.
A small building was present at the northwest end of the Phase Two Propertyoccupied by the Grimsby Auxiliary Marine Rescue Unit as a radio monitoring station.According to the Phase One ESA, no former buildings were present on-site. Theowner will construct residential condominiums but the plan of subdivision is notfinalized. This small rescue building which is not used and is not in the areas withCOCs and therefore, on-Site vapour intrusion is not considered a concern at thePhase Two Property.
The overburden in the vicinity of the Phase Two Property is interpreted to be HaltonTill of the Ontario-Erie Lobe, consisting of predominantly silt to silty clay matrix, highin matrix carbonate content and clast poor. Bedrock in the area is anticipated to beof the Upper Ordovician age, consisting of shale, limestone, dolostone and siltstone
Regulatory Requirement Phase Two Property Information
of the Queenston Formation. Bedrock in the vicinity of the Phase Two Property isanticipated to be approximately 1 to 7 mbgs inferring bedrock is anticipated to beencountered at approximately 68 to 74 mASL.
The regional ground water flow direction, based on topographic features andknowledge gained from other sites in the area, is expected to be to the north,towards Lake Ontario. Locally, however, the shallow ground water flow may beinfluenced by underground utility trenches, conduits, and structures, variations insoil type, and minor fluctuations in topography. As shown in Figure 5, theinterpreted ground water flow is southeasterly based on hydrogeological testing.
There are areas of natural significance located in the area of the Phase TwoProperty. The land surrounding Forty Mile Creek adjacent to the west of the PhaseTwo Property, as well as the south shoreline of Lake Ontario, are listed in the Townof Grimsby’s Official Plan as Environmental Conservation Area. However, thePhase Two Property is not considered to be an area of natural significance. Thereare no conditions that would apply to the Phase Two Property under Section 41(Environmentally Sensitive Areas).
The water level measurements undertaken in BH/MW1, BH/MW2, and BH/MW3 onFebruary 6, 2014 ranged from 1.82 to 2.21 mbgs. The relative water level elevationranged from 98.42 (BH/MW2) to 98.55 (BH/MW3) mAAD. The inferred groundwater flow within the native silty clay/clayey silt/sandy silt till is inferred to besoutheasterly (Figure 5).
AMEC completed falling head slug tests to assess the hydraulic conductivity of thescreened substrata in BH/MW1, BH/MW2 and BH/MW3. The estimated hydraulicconductivities of BH/MW1, BH/MW2 and BH/MW3 were 2.7x10-6 m/s, 1.3x10-7 m/sand 7.9x10-6 m/s, respectively. The horizontal gradient is 0.024 m/m and the verticalhydraulic gradient was not determined as only one geologic unit was investigated.
The standards used for the identification of COCs were Table 9 SCS for use within30 m of a water body, non potable ground water condition,residential/parkland/institutional and medium and fine textured soils.
iii. Contaminants on the Site The contaminants located on the Phase Two Property and their origin are as follows: Metals (cadmium, lead and/or zinc) and available boron in BH/MW1,
TP109 and TP110 associated with the historical infilling of the Phase TwoProperty.
Metals (antimony, cadmium lead and/or zinc) and EC in BH/MW2, TP105and TP108 associated with the historical infilling of the Phase TwoProperty.
PHC F3 and F4 in BH/MW1 and TP100 associated the historical infilling ofthe Phase Two Property.
The Acid, Base, Neutral parameters group was not considered a COC and thereforewas not analyzed. No exceedances of the Table 9 SCS for metals, VOCs and PHCswere noted in ground water in the Phase Two ESA.
Contaminants that exceeded the Table 9 SCS on the Site in soil are depicted onFigures 3, 4 and 6. The COCs in soil are likely attributed to the former infilling of
Regulatory Requirement Phase Two Property Information
the Phase Two property. The estimated and actual horizontal and verticaldistribution of the contaminants in each area is indicated on Figures 2, 3 and 4.Based on the soil analytical results from the Phase Two ESA, a SRP was completedat the Site. The horizontal and vertical delineation of COCs and the distribution ofmetals, EC, available boron and PHC F3 and F4 exceeding Table 9 SCS on-Site(Figures 3, 4 and 6) correspond to the locations of the historical infilling on-Site.
Based on the delineation testpitting program completed as part of the Phase TwoESA, the separation distance between boreholes/testpits with no Table 9 SCSexceedances and boreholes/testpits with Table 9 SCS exceedances, AMECestimated the amount of PHC, EC, available boron and metals-impacted soilrequired to be removed for off-Site disposal to be 831 tonnes. Based on actual fieldobservations and lab results, a SRP was completed at the Site and included theremoval of approximately 1,056 tonnes of PHC, EC, available boron and metals-impacted soil to a Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC)licensed landfill (Niagara Waste Systems Limited – Atlas landfill in Welland, ON).Confirmatory soil sampling and soil vapour readings at the limits of the soilremediation excavations were below the Table 9 SCS for the COCs (metals, EC,PHCs and available boron). The location of the confirmatory sampling and soilvapour readings are indicated on Figures 11 and 12. The remedial excavation wasbackfilled with granular material from a local quarry.
The transport of these COCs in the surface would be influenced by seasonalfluctuations in ground water elevation as well as the underground utilities and arenot expected to have had a significant effect on the horizontal and verticaldistribution of contaminants.
iv. Cross-Sections anddistribution of contaminants,depth to water, stratigraphy,subsurface structures orutilities affecting distribution.
For areas of contamination,release mechanisms,transport pathways,receptors, exposure pointsand routes of exposure.
The cross-sections provided on Figures 3 and 4 identify the depth to water (rangedfrom 1.82 to 2.21 mbgs), stratigraphy (fill over native silty clay/clayey silt/sandy silttill) and that there are no significant subsurface features that affect distribution ofcontaminants. The horizontal and vertical distribution of contaminants is indicatedin Figures 3, 4 and 6.
Figures 9 and 10 illustrate the Human Health and Ecological Exposure ConceptualModels. The models are described as follows:
Source:The source of the COCs at the Site (metals, PHC, available boron and EC) is theformer infilling on-Site.
Potential Release Mechanism: Wind Erosion Volatilization (volatiles only) Uptake by Plants and Intake by Prey
Contaminant Transport Pathways (exposure route); Dermal Contact, Stem/Foliar Contact Ingestion Inhalation of airborne particles Inhalation (indoor and outdoor air)
Regulatory Requirement Phase Two Property Information
Ingestion by Plants and Prey
Human and Ecological Receptors:Potential human receptors include future residents and visitors and constructionworkers and potential ecological receptors include terrestrial plants, invertebrates,mammals and birds.
Receptor Exposure Points:Human exposure (resident, visitor) to COCs in soil via dermal contact, ingestion,inhalation of indoor and outdoor air. No contaminants were found in ground waterand no complete exposure pathway is present.
Ecological exposure (terrestrial plants) anticipated through root update, inhalationvia wind erosion and volatilization in ambient air. The exposure to COCs byterrestrial invertebrates is expected through soil ingestion, dermal contact andinhalation of volatiles in ambient air. The exposure to COCs of terrestrial mammalsand birds is expected through soil ingestion, dermal contact, ingestion of plans andprey, inhalation via wind erosion, inhalation of volatiles in ambient air. Nocontaminants were found in ground water and no complete exposure pathway ispresent.
The Phase Two CSM is shown in Figure 8.
SITE
L
A
K
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
M
A
P
L
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
Q
E
W
2500 500m
Scale in Metres
CLIENT:
TITLE:
PROJECT:
SCALE:
CHK'D BY:
DWN BY:
DATUM:
PROJECTION:
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
REV. NO.:
FIGURE No.:
N
FORAN'S MARINE
DG
PS
NAD 83
UTM Zone 17
AS SHOWN
PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
15 LAKE STREET,
GRIMSBY, ONTARIO
SITE LOCATION PLAN
A
TG131180
1
Reference: Base Map from First Base Solutions.NOTE: For Illustration Purposes Only. All Locations Approximate.
a Division of AMEC Americas Limited
3300 Merrittville Hwy, Unit 5
Thorold, Ontario
L2V 4Y6
AMEC Environment & Infrastructure
AUGUST 2014
0 25
Scale in Metres
50m
B
B'
A'
A
BH-8
BH-9
BH-4
BH-5
BH-6
TP-100
TP-101-B
TP-110
TP-111
TP-109
TP-105
TP-103
TP-102
TP-106
TP-107
TP-108
TP-104
BH-7
BH/MW-3
BH/MW-2
BH/MW-1
BH-10
TBM
LEGEND:
CLIENT:
TITLE:
PROJECT:
SCALE:
CHK'D BY:
DWN BY:
DATUM:
PROJECTION:
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
REV. NO.:
FIGURE No.:
N
FORAN'S MARINE
DG
PS
NAD 83
UTM Zone 17
1:500
PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
15 LAKE STREET,
GRIMSBY, ONTARIO
BOREHOLE/MONITORING WELL & TESTPIT
LOCATION PLAN
A
AUGUST 2014
TG131180
2
Reference: Base Map from Niagara Navigator.
NOTE: For Illustration Purposes Only. All Locations Approximate.
a Division of AMEC Americas Limited
3300 Merrittville Hwy, Unit 5
Thorold, Ontario
L2V 4Y6
AMEC Environment & Infrastructure
HYD
SITE BOUNDARY
BOREHOLE LOCATION
MONITORING WELL LOCATION
TESTPIT LOCATION
CATCH BASIN
MANHOLE
FIRE HYDRANT
WATERMAIN
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER
CROSS-SECTION
ESTIMATED SOIL
REMEDIATION EXCAVATIONS
ACTUAL SOIL REMEDIATION
EXCAVATIONS (MAY 2014)
TEMPORARY BENCHMARK
TBM
HORIZONTAL DISTANCE (m)
15
101
0
A
Southwest
30 45 60 75 90
BH/MW-1
(100.29)
100
99
98
97
96
95
94
93
TP-110
(100.49)
BH-8
(101.01)
BH-9
(101.16)
TP-105
(100.76)
TP-103
(100.63)
TP-104
(100.64)
BH-4
(100.09)
101
A'
Northeast
100
99
98
97
96
95
94
93
BH/MW-2
(100.56)
BH-7
(100.46)
LEGEND:
WELL SCREEN
GROUND WATER ELEVATION,
6 FEBRUARY 2014
FILL
SAND AND GRAVEL
SILTY CLAY TO CLAYEY SILT
SANDY SILT TILL
TEST PIT
BOREHOLE WITH
MONITORING WELL
BOREHOLE
SAMPLE LOCATIONS FOR
METALS ANALYSIS IN SOIL
SAMPLE LOCATIONS FOR
BTEX/VOC ANALYSIS IN SOIL
SAMPLE LOCATIONS FOR
PHCs ANALYSIS IN SOIL
SAMPLE LOCATIONS FOR
INORGANICS ANALYSIS IN
SOIL
SAMPLE LOCATIONS FOR
PAHs ANALYSIS IN SOIL
SAMPLE LOCATIONS FOR
METALS ANALYSIS IN
GROUND WATER
SAMPLE LOCATIONS FOR
BTEX/VOC ANALYSIS IN
GROUND WATER
SAMPLE LOCATIONS FOR
PHCs ANALYSIS IN GROUND
WATER
SAMPLE EXCEEDED TABLE 9
SCS
ESTIMATED SOIL
REMEDIATION EXCAVATIONS
ACTUAL SOIL REMEDIATION
EXCAVATIONS (MAY 2014)
NOTE
INORGANICS ANALYSIS
INCLUDES EC, SAR, pH AND
CYANIDE FREE. NO GROUND
WATER EXCEEDANCES OF
TABLE 9 SCS.
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
CLIENT:
TITLE:
PROJECT:
SCALE:
CHK'D BY:
DWN BY:
DATUM:
PROJECTION:
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
REV. NO.:
FIGURE No.:
FORAN'S MARINE
ZF
PS
-
-
AS SHOWN
PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
15 LAKE STREET,
GRIMSBY, ONTARIO
GEOLOGICAL PROFILE A-A'
A
TG131180
3
NOTE: For Illustration Purposes Only. All Locations Approximate.
a Division of AMEC Americas Limited
3300 Merrittville Hwy, Unit 5
Thorold, Ontario
L2V 4Y6
AMEC Environment & Infrastructure
AUGUST 2014
T
P
-
1
0
7
5
101
0
B
West
100
99
98
97
96
95
94
93
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
101
B'
East
100
99
98
97
96
95
94
93
BH/MW-3
(100.76)
TP-103
(100.63)
BH/MW-2
(100.56)
TP-107
(100.65)
HORIZONTAL DISTANCE (m)
LEGEND:
WELL SCREEN
GROUND WATER ELEVATION,
6 FEBRUARY 2014
FILL
SAND AND GRAVEL
SILTY CLAY TO CLAYEY SILT
SANDY SILT TILL
TEST PIT
BOREHOLE WITH
MONITORING WELL
BOREHOLE
SAMPLE LOCATIONS FOR
METALS ANALYSIS IN SOIL
SAMPLE LOCATIONS FOR
PHCs ANALYSIS IN SOIL
SAMPLE LOCATIONS FOR
INORGANICS ANALYSIS IN
SOIL
SAMPLE LOCATIONS FOR
PAHs ANALYSIS IN SOIL
SAMPLE LOCATIONS FOR
METALS ANALYSIS IN
GROUND WATER
SAMPLE LOCATIONS FOR
BTEX/VOC ANALYSIS IN
GROUND WATER
SAMPLE LOCATIONS FOR
PHCs ANALYSIS IN GROUND
WATER
SAMPLE EXCEEDED TABLE 9
SCS
ESTIMATED SOIL
REMEDIATION EXCAVATIONS
ACTUAL SOIL REMEDIATION
EXCAVATIONS (MAY 2014)
NOTE
INORGANICS ANALYSIS
INCLUDES EC, SAR, pH AND
CYANIDE FREE. NO GROUND
WATER EXCEEDANCES OF
TABLE 9 SCS.
CLIENT:
TITLE:
PROJECT:
SCALE:
CHK'D BY:
DWN BY:
DATUM:
PROJECTION:
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
REV. NO.:
FIGURE No.:
FORAN'S MARINE
ZF
PS
-
-
AS SHOWN
PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
15 LAKE STREET,
GRIMSBY, ONTARIO
GEOLOGICAL PROFILE B-B'
A
TG131180
4
NOTE: For Illustration Purposes Only. All Locations Approximate.
a Division of AMEC Americas Limited
3300 Merrittville Hwy, Unit 5
Thorold, Ontario
L2V 4Y6
AMEC Environment & Infrastructure
AUGUST 2014
0 25
Scale in Metres
50m
BH-4
BH/MW-3
98.75
BH-8
BH-9
BH-5
BH-6
TP-100
TP-101-B
TP-110
TP-111
TP-109
TP-105
TP-103
TP-102
TP-106
TP-107
TP-108
TP-104
BH-7
BH/MW-2
98.42
BH/MW-1
98.47
9
8
.
7
BH-10
9
8
.
6
9
8
.
5
CLIENT:
TITLE:
PROJECT:
SCALE:
CHK'D BY:
DWN BY:
DATUM:
PROJECTION:
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
REV. NO.:
FIGURE No.:
N
FORAN'S MARINE
DG
PS
NAD 83
UTM Zone 17
1:500
PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
15 LAKE STREET,
GRIMSBY, ONTARIO
INTERPRETED GROUND WATER CONTOUR PLAN
(FEBRUARY 6, 2014)
A
TG131180
5
Reference: Base Map from Niagara Navigator.
NOTE: For Illustration Purposes Only. All Locations Approximate.
a Division of AMEC Americas Limited
3300 Merrittville Hwy, Unit 5
Thorold, Ontario
L2V 4Y6
AMEC Environment & Infrastructure
LEGEND:
HYD
SITE BOUNDARY
BOREHOLE LOCATION
MONITORING WELL LOCATION
TESTPIT LOCATION
CATCH BASIN
MANHOLE
FIRE HYDRANT
WATERMAIN
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER
INTERPRETED GROUND
WATER CONTOUR
INFERRED GROUND WATER
FLOW DIRECTION
AUGUST 2014
0 25
Scale in Metres
50m
BH-4
BH/MW-3
BH-8
BH-5
TP-105
TP-103
TP-102
TP-106
TP-107
TP-108
TP-104
BH-7
BH/MW-1
BH-10
BH/MW-2
BH-6
BH-9
TP-100
TP-101-B
TP-109
TP-111
TP-110
CLIENT:
TITLE:
PROJECT:
SCALE:
CHK'D BY:
DWN BY:
DATUM:
PROJECTION:
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
REV. NO.:
FIGURE No.:
N
FORAN'S MARINE
ZF
PS
NAD 83
UTM Zone 17
1:500
PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
15 LAKE STREET,
GRIMSBY, ONTARIO
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS AND MOE TABLE 9
EXCEEDANCES
A
TG131180
6
Reference: Base Map from Niagara Navigator.
NOTE: For Illustration Purposes Only. All Locations Approximate.
a Division of AMEC Americas Limited
3300 Merrittville Hwy, Unit 5
Thorold, Ontario
L2V 4Y6
AMEC Environment & Infrastructure
LEGEND:
HYD
SITE BOUNDARY
BOREHOLE LOCATION
MONITORING WELL LOCATION
TESTPIT LOCATION
CATCH BASIN
MANHOLE
FIRE HYDRANT
WATERMAIN
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER
SOIL SAMPLE SUBMITTED
FOR METALS
SOIL SAMPLE SUBMITTED
FOR EC
SOIL SAMPLE SUBMITTED
FOR PHCs
SOIL SAMPLE SUBMITTED
FOR HWS BORON
SOIL SAMPLE SUBMITTED
FOR PAHs
SOIL SAMPLE SUBMITTED
FOR VOCs/BTEX
SOIL SAMPLE EXCEEDED
TABLE 9 SCS
STATION TP109
DEPTH 0.5m
UNIT
µg/g
PARAMETERS
CADMIUM 2.1
ZINC 733
STATION TP110
DEPTH 0.5m
UNIT
µg/g
PARAMETERS
CADMIUM 1.4
LEAD 335
ZINC 565
STATION BH/MW1
DEPTH 0.4m 1.0 m
UNIT
µg/g
PARAMETERS
PHC F3 768 -
PHC F4 2940 -
HWS BORON - 2.2
STATION BH/MW2
DEPTH 0.4m
UNIT
µg/g
PARAMETERS
ANTIMONY 1.6
EC
870 (S/cm)
STATION TP100
DEPTH 1.5m
UNIT
µg/g
PARAMETERS
PHC F4 165
STATION TP105
DEPTH 0.5m
UNIT
µg/g
PARAMETERS
CADMIUM 2.3
LEAD 121
ZINC 646
STATION TP106
DEPTH 0.5m
UNIT
µg/g
PARAMETERS
EC
768 (S/cm)
STATION TP108
DEPTH 0.5m
UNIT
µg/g
PARAMETERS
ZINC 311
AUGUST 2014
0 25
Scale in Metres
50m
BH-4
BH/MW-3
BH-8
BH-9
BH-5
BH-6
TP-100
TP-101-B
TP-110
TP-111
TP-109
TP-105
TP-103
TP-102
TP-106
TP-107
TP-108
TP-104
BH-7
BH/MW-2
BH/MW-1
BH-10
CLIENT:
TITLE:
PROJECT:
SCALE:
CHK'D BY:
DWN BY:
DATUM:
PROJECTION:
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
REV. NO.:
FIGURE No.:
N
FORAN'S MARINE
ZF
PS
NAD 83
UTM Zone 17
1:500
PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
15 LAKE STREET,
GRIMSBY, ONTARIO
GROUND WATER SAMPLE LOCATIONS
A
TG131180
7
Reference: Base Map from Niagara Navigator.
NOTE: For Illustration Purposes Only. All Locations Approximate.
a Division of AMEC Americas Limited
3300 Merrittville Hwy, Unit 5
Thorold, Ontario
L2V 4Y6
AMEC Environment & Infrastructure
LEGEND:
HYD
SITE BOUNDARY
BOREHOLE LOCATION
MONITORING WELL LOCATION
TESTPIT LOCATION
CATCH BASIN
MANHOLE
FIRE HYDRANT
WATERMAIN
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER
GROUND WATER SAMPLE
SUBMITTED FOR METALS
GROUND WATER SAMPLE
SUBMITTED FOR PHCs
GROUND WATER SAMPLE
SUBMITTED FOR VOCs
AUGUST 2014
1000 200m
Scale in Metres
LAKE ONTARIO
WATER
TREATMENT
PLANT
F
O
R
T
Y
M
IL
E
C
R
E
E
K
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
M
A
R
IN
A
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
435
3
FORAN'S MARINA
& STORE
464
471
E
L
I
Z
A
B
E
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
O
N
T
A
R
I
O
S
T
R
E
E
T
M
A
P
L
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
L
A
K
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
F
O
R
T
Y
M
IL
E
C
R
E
E
K
M
AR
IN
A C
HA
NN
EL
5
4
3
1
6
2
7
8
APEC #1
FILL MATERIAL OF
UNKNOWN QUALITY
(PCA #1)
0 20m10
Scale in Metres
2
APEC #2 / PCA #2
BOAT MAINTENANCE & REPAIR
APEC #3 / PCA #3
UST AT MARINA
CLIENT:
TITLE:
PROJECT:
SCALE:
CHK'D BY:
DWN BY:
DATUM:
PROJECTION:
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
REV. NO.:
FIGURE No.:
N
FORAN'S MARINE
DG
PS
NAD 83
UTM Zone 17
AS SHOWN
PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
15 LAKE STREET,
GRIMSBY, ONTARIO
CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL
A
AUGUST 2014
TG131180
8
Reference: Base Map from Niagara Navigator.
NOTE: For Illustration Purposes Only. All Locations Approximate.
a Division of AMEC Americas Limited
3300 Merrittville Hwy, Unit 5
Thorold, Ontario
L2V 4Y6
AMEC Environment & Infrastructure
LEGEND:
PROPERTY BOUNDARY
ESTIMATED SOIL REMEDIATION
EXCAVATIONS
ACTUAL SOIL REMEDIATION
EXCAVATIONS (MAY 2014)
CATCH BASIN
MANHOLE
FIRE HYDRANT
WATERMAIN
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER
HYD
1 RADIO BUILDING (NO ACCESS)
2 CATCH BASIN (DRAINS TO
STORMCEPTOR SOUTH OF PHASE ONE
PROPERTY
3 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF
STORMCEPTOR (DRAINS TO CHANNEL
EAST OF PHASE ONE PROPERTY
4 BOAT TRAILER STORAGE, SOME
CONCRETE RUBBLE/STONE
5 CONCRETE BLOCKS, PIPES,
STONES/BOULDERS, ALUMINUM,
GRAVEL PILE, 2 BOAT CRADLES
6 OUTDOOR SHELVES (WOOD, PIPE,
CONTAINER STORAGE {EMPTY
WATER DRUMS})
7 WOODEN SKIDS, METAL, CONCRETE
8 EMPTY ALUMINUM DOCK BOXES
(TEMPORARY STORAGE)
SourceBoat RepairFacility withUST (Off-Site) and
Infilling (On-Site)
Receptor
Chemicalsof Concern(COCs) in
Soil(metals,PHCs,VOCs,HWS
Boron, EC.benzene,PHC F1)
Dermal Contact and Ingestion
Inhalation (airborne particles)
Exposure RouteRelease and Transport
Inhalation (indoor air)
Wind Erosion
Con
stru
ctio
nW
orke
r
Inhalation (outdoor air)Volatilization (volatiles only)
Project No.: TG131180
AMEC Environment & Infrastructure3300 Merrittville Hwy, Unit 5Thorold, Ontario, Canada, L2V 4Y6
Date: August 2014
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
COCs inGround
Water (noimpactsnoted)
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
No No
Yes Yes
Res
iden
ts
Vis
itors
Figure 9: Human Health Conceptual ModelNorth End of 15 Lake Street, Grimsby, ON
Inhalation (indoor andoutdoor air)
Volatilization (volatiles only) NoNo No
Dermal Contact and Ingestion NoNo No
Legend: Yes – complete exposure pathway; No – incomplete exposure pathway (no receptor present); NA – not applicable.
AMEC Earth & Environmental3300 Merrittville Hwy, Unit 5Thorold, Ontario, Canada, L2V 4Y6
Legend: Yes – complete exposure pathway; NA – Not applicable / incomplete exposure pathway.
Figure 10: Ecological Conceptual ModelNorth End of 15 Lake Street, Grimsby, ON
Project No.: TG131180 Date: August 2014
Chemicals ofConcern
(COCs) inSoil (metals,
PHCs, VOCs,HWS Boron,
EC.
Soil Ingestion
Root Uptake/Dermal Contact
Ingestion of Plants and PreyUptake by Plants and Intake by Prey
NA
SourceBoat RepairFacility withUST (Off-Site) and
Infilling (On-Site)
Receptors and Complete ExposurePathways
Exposure RouteRelease and Transport
Ter
rest
rial
Bir
ds
Ter
rest
rial
Mam
mal
s
Ter
rest
rial
Inve
rteb
rate
s
Ter
rest
rial
Plan
ts
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
NA NA Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Aqu
atic
NA
NA
NA
COCs inGroundwater– no impacts
Stem and Foliar Contact
Ingestion of Plants and PreyUptake by Plants and Intake by Prey
NA NA NA
NA NA NA
NA
NA NA
NA
Dermal / Direct ContactNA NA NA NA NA
Inhalation
Stem and Foliar Contact
Inhalation
Yes NA Yes
NA NA
Yes Yes Yes
Yes
Yes
NA
Yes
NA
NA
NA
Wind Erosion
Volatilization (volatiles only)Ambient Air
Volatilization (volatiles only)Ambient Air
InhalationNA NA NA NA NA
A
B
CD
A
0.0m
1.5m
0m 4m2m 6m 8m 10m 12m 14m 15.2m
ACS-4
145/0
ACS-5+DUP CSZ
180/0
ACS-2
140/1
ACS-6
270/0
75/0 120/0
80/0 75/0
ACS-7
250/0
B
C
0.0m
1.5m
0m 4m2m 6m 8m 10m 12m 14m 15m
D
B
0.0m
1.5m
0m 4m2m 6m 8m 10m 12.2m
C
D
0.0m
1.5m
0m 4m2m 6m 8m 10m 12m 14m 15.3m
25/0
220/0
A
ACS-11
70/0
50/0 20/0
30/0
ACS-9
220/0
110/0
80/0
90/0
ACS-12
50/0
0/0
50/0
ACS-14
250/0
ACS-13+DUP CSW
270/0 250/0
150/0
140/0
ACS-8
240/0
100/0
CLIENT:
TITLE:
PROJECT:
SCALE:
CHK'D BY:
DWN BY:
DATUM:
PROJECTION:
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
REV. NO.:
FIGURE No.:
N
FORAN'S MARINE
ZF
PS
NAD 83
UTM Zone 17
AS SHOWN
SOIL REMEDIATION PROGRAM
15 LAKE STREET,
GRIMSBY, ONTARIO
CONFIRMATORY SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS -
AREA A
A
JULY 2014
TG131180
11
NOTE: For Illustration Purposes Only. All Locations Approximate.
a Division of AMEC Americas Limited
3300 Merrittville Hwy, Unit 5
Thorold, Ontario
L2V 4Y6
AMEC Environment & Infrastructure
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
COV/TOV FIELD VAPOUR READING
(ppm)
SOIL SAMPLE COLLECTED FOR
FIELD VAPOUR READING
SOIL SAMPLE COLLECTED FOR
FIELD VAPOUR READING AND
SUBMITTED FOR LABORATORY
ANALYSIS
ACS1
140/1
LEGEND:
EXCAVATION LIMIT
FLOOR PLAN
WALL CROSS-SECTION
NORTH WALL EAST WALL
SOUTH WALL WEST WALL
E F
G
H
E
0.0m
1.5m
0m 4m2m 6m 8m 10m 12m 14m
BCS-6
0/0
14m17.1m
BCS-1
0/0
BCS-2
10/0
BCS-5
20/0
BCS-4+DUP CSX
0/0
BCS-7
45/0
F
0.0m
1.5m
0m 2m
BCS-8
45/1
F
4m 6m 8m 10m 12m 13.9m
G
G
0.0m
1.5m
0m 4m2m 6m 8m 10m 12m 14m
BCS-10
0/0
14m17.1m
BCS-11
0/0
H
0.0m
1.5m
0m 2m
BCS-12
0/0
H
4.3m
E
30/0
0/0
0/0
CLIENT:
TITLE:
PROJECT:
SCALE:
CHK'D BY:
DWN BY:
DATUM:
PROJECTION:
DATE:
PROJECT NO.:
REV. NO.:
FIGURE No.:
N
FORAN'S MARINE
ZF
PS
NAD 83
UTM Zone 17
AS SHOWN
SOIL REMEDIATION PROGRAM
15 LAKE STREET,
GRIMSBY, ONTARIO
CONFIRMATORY SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS -
AREA B
A
JULY 2014
TG131180
12
NOTE: For Illustration Purposes Only. All Locations Approximate.
a Division of AMEC Americas Limited
3300 Merrittville Hwy, Unit 5
Thorold, Ontario
L2V 4Y6
AMEC Environment & Infrastructure
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
COV/TOV FIELD VAPOUR READING
(ppm)
SOIL SAMPLE COLLECTED FOR
FIELD VAPOUR READING
SOIL SAMPLE COLLECTED FOR
FIELD VAPOUR READING AND
SUBMITTED FOR LABORATORY
ANALYSIS
BCS1
25/0
LEGEND:
EXCAVATION LIMIT
FLOOR PLAN
WALL CROSS-SECTION
NORTH WALL EAST WALL
SOUTH WALL WEST WALL