Record of Site Condition # 217367 Record of Site Condition Under ...

Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # 217367

Record of Site Condition

Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act

Summary

Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence

This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has

access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings

with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental

condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.

Contents of this Record of Site Condition

This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from

the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been

submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.

Record of Site Condition Number 217367Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2015/04/10Certification Date 2014/11/28Current Property Use CommercialIntended Property Use ResidentialCertificate of Property Use Number No CPUApplicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard,

with Non-potable Ground Water, CoarseTextured Soil, for Residential property use

Property Municipal Address 34 QUEENSTON STREET, ST. CATHARINES,ON, L2R 2Y9, 36 QUEENSTON STREET, ST.CATHARINES, ON, L2R 2Y9

1 of 18Filed Record of Site Condition # 217367 on 2015/04/10

PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS

Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC

Owner Name QUEENSTON RESIDENCES INC.

Authorized Person ALLAN JONES

Mailing Address 1314 CONTOUR DRIVE, MISSISSAUGAONTARIO, CANADA

Postal Code L5H 1B2

Phone (416) 953-8852

Fax

Email Address [email protected]


RSC Property Location Information

Municipal Address(es) 34 QUEENSTON STREET, ST. CATHARINES, ON L2R 2Y9

36 QUEENSTON STREET, ST. CATHARINES, ON L2R 2Y9

Municipality St. Catharines

Legal Description See Attached Lawyer’s Letter

Assessment Roll Number(s)

030001106000000

030001107000000

Property Identifier Number(s)

46264-0078 (LT)

46264-0079 (LT)

RSC Property Geographical References

Coordinate System UTM

Datum NAD 83

Zone 17

Easting 643,230.00

Northing 4,780,362.00

RSC Property Use Information

The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use.

Current Property Use Commercial

Intended Property Use Residential

Certificate of Property Use has been issued under section 168.6 of the EPA

No


Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC

The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank


PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON’S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONSQualified Person's Information

Name PATRICK DENNIS SHRINER

Type of Membership Under the Professional Geoscientists Act

Practising Member

Membership Number 0407

QP Employer Name AMEC FOSTER WHEELER AMERICAS LIMITED

Mailing Address 3300 MERRITTVILLE HIGHWAY, THOROLDONTARIO, L2V 4Y6 CANADA

Phone (905) 687-6616

Fax (905) 687-6620

Email Address [email protected]

Municipal Information

Local or Single-Tier Municipality

St. Catharines

Upper-Tier Municipality Niagara

Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change District Office

District Office Niagara District Office

District Office Address 9th floor, 301 St. Paul St., St. Catharines ON L2R 3M8


Phase One Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(YYYY/MM/DD)

2014-10-30

Type of Report

Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)

Author of Report

Name of ConsultingCompany

P1 ESA Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Commercial/Residential Property 34-36 Queenston Street St. Catharines, Ontario

2014-10-30 Patrick Shriner, P.Geo., Cassandra Johnston

AMEC FOSTER WHEELER AMERICAS LIMITED

Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment


Author of Report


N/A


Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(YYYY/MM/DD)

2015-01-12

Type of Report


Author of Report


P2 ESA Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment 34 & 36 Queenston Street St. Catharines, Ontario

2015-01-13 Patrick Shriner, P.Geo., Kelly Patterson

AMEC FOSTER WHEELER AMERICAS LIMITED

Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment

Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD).

Author of Report


N/A


Environmental ConditionSection 41 applies? No

Section 43.1 applies? No

Site Condition InformationCertification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2014/11/28

Total area of RSC property (in hectares) 0.23200

Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property

Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property

Soil Texture Coarse

Assessment/Restoration Approach Full Depth Generic

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water? Yes

Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04?

Yes

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under the property which is used in the RSC?

Yes

Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or sediment

PARACEL LABORATORIES LTD.

Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Non-potable

Applicable Site Condition Standard TABLE 3

Local or single-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2015/01/07

Upper-tier municipality non-potable written notification date 2015/01/07


Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil

ContaminantName

Maximum Concentration

Applicable Site Condition Standard

Unit of Measure

1 Boron (Hot Water Soluble)* < 0.5 1.5 µg/g

2 Chromium VI 0.6 8 µg/g

3 Cyanide (CN-) 0.05 0.051 µg/g

4 Electrical Conductivity 0.689 0.7 mS/cm

5 Mercury 0.2 0.27 µg/g

6 Sodium Adsorption Ratio 2.32 5

7 Acetone < 0.5 16 µg/g

8 Bromomethane < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

9 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

10 Chlorobenzene < 0.05 2.4 µg/g

11 Chloroform < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

12 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.05 3.4 µg/g



15 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.05 16 µg/g

16 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.05 3.5 µg/g

17 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

18 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

19 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.05 3.4 µg/g

20 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.05 0.084 µg/g

21 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

22 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

23 Ethylene dibromide < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

24 Hexane (n) < 0.05 2.8 µg/g

25 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 0.5 16 µg/g

26 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 0.5 1.7 µg/g

27 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.05 0.75 µg/g

28 Methylene Chloride < 0.05 0.1 µg/g

29 Styrene < 0.05 0.7 µg/g

30 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.05 0.058 µg/g

31 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

32 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.05 0.28 µg/g

33 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.05 0.38 µg/g

34 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.05 0.05 µg/g

35 Trichloroethylene < 0.05 0.061 µg/g

...Continued on next page


Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil

Continued from previous page....

ContaminantName



Unit of Measure

36 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.05 4 µg/g

37 Vinyl Chloride < 0.02 0.02 µg/g

38 Bromodichloromethane < 0.05 13 µg/g

39 Bromoform < 0.05 0.27 µg/g

40 Dibromochloromethane < 0.05 9.4 µg/g

41 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 7 55 µg/g

42 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 4 98 µg/g



45 Antimony < 1 7.5 µg/g

46 Arsenic 7.5 18 µg/g

47 Selenium < 0.5 2.4 µg/g

48 Barium 269 390 µg/g

49 Beryllium < 1 4 µg/g

50 Boron (total) 6.9 120 µg/g

51 Cadmium < 0.5 1.2 µg/g

52 Chromium Total 17.4 160 µg/g

53 Cobalt 10 22 µg/g

54 Copper 85.2 140 µg/g

55 Lead 114 120 µg/g

56 Molybdenum < 1 6.9 µg/g

57 Nickel 20.8 100 µg/g

58 Silver < 1 20 µg/g

59 Thallium < 1 1 µg/g

60 Uranium < 1 23 µg/g

61 Vanadium 33.3 86 µg/g

62 Zinc 84.6 340 µg/g

63 Benzene < 0.02 0.21 µg/g

64 Ethylbenzene < 0.05 2 µg/g

65 Toluene < 0.05 2.3 µg/g

66 Xylene Mixture < 0.05 3.1 µg/g


Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)

Ground Water

ContaminantName



Unit of Measure

1 Acetone < 5 130000 µg/L

2 Bromomethane < 0.5 5.6 µg/L

3 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.2 0.79 µg/L

4 Chlorobenzene < 0.5 630 µg/L

5 Chloroform < 0.5 2.4 µg/L

6 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.5 4600 µg/L



9 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 1 4400 µg/L

10 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.5 320 µg/L

11 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

12 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

13 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

14 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

15 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.5 16 µg/L

16 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.5 5.2 µg/L

17 Ethylene dibromide < 0.2 0.25 µg/L

18 Hexane (n) < 1 51 µg/L

19 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 5 470000 µg/L

20 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 5 140000 µg/L

21 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 2 190 µg/L

22 Methylene Chloride < 5 610 µg/L

23 Styrene < 0.5 1300 µg/L

24 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.5 3.3 µg/L

25 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.5 3.2 µg/L

26 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

27 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.5 640 µg/L

28 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.5 4.7 µg/L

29 Trichloroethylene < 0.5 1.6 µg/L

30 Trichlorofluoromethane < 1 2500 µg/L

31 Vinyl Chloride < 0.5 0.5 µg/L

32 Bromodichloromethane < 0.5 85000 µg/L

33 Bromoform < 0.5 380 µg/L

34 Dibromochloromethane < 0.5 82000 µg/L

35 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 25 750 µg/L

...Continued on next page


Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)

Ground Water

Continued from previous page....

ContaminantName



Unit of Measure

36 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 100 150 µg/L



39 Sodium 151,000 2300000 µg/L

40 Antimony 0.6 20000 µg/L

41 Arsenic < 1 1900 µg/L

42 Selenium 3 63 µg/L

43 Barium 169 29000 µg/L

44 Beryllium < 0.5 67 µg/L

45 Boron (total) 140 45000 µg/L

46 Cadmium < 0.1 2.7 µg/L

47 Chromium Total < 1 810 µg/L

48 Cobalt < 0.5 66 µg/L

49 Copper < 0.5 87 µg/L

50 Lead < 0.1 25 µg/L

51 Molybdenum 7.8 9200 µg/L

52 Nickel 2 490 µg/L

53 Silver 0.2 1.5 µg/L

54 Thallium 0.2 510 µg/L

55 Uranium 4.4 420 µg/L

56 Vanadium 1.1 250 µg/L

57 Zinc < 5 1100 µg/L

58 Benzene < 0.5 44 µg/L

59 Ethylbenzene < 0.5 2300 µg/L

60 Toluene < 0.5 18000 µg/L

61 Xylene Mixture < 0.5 4200 µg/L


Remedial Action and Mitigation

Remediated Soils

Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.

Soil Remediation Process Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³)

Description of Remediation

Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property.

Off-site removal and disposal at the Niagara Waste Systems Limited, Thorold Landfill (MOECC licensed) on November 27 and 28, 2014 of 121 m3 of metals and electrical conductivity-impacted soils.

Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned

Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³) 121.0

Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³)

Soil Brought to the Property

Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A.

Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property(in-ground volume in m³)


Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures

Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing.

Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date.

Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres)


Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures

Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

Monitoring or Maintenance

Soil Management Measures

Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

Ground Water Management Measures

Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From Near Property Boundary

Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation?

Yes


Qualified Person’s Statements and CertificationsAs the qualified person, I certify that:

A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary.

As of 2014/11/28, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC.

Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

I have, within the six months immediately before the submission of this record of site condition, given written notice of intention to apply non-potable ground water site condition standards to the clerk of the local municipality in which the property is located and the clerk of any upper-tier municipality in which the property is located.

As of 2014/11/28, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 37 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment.

As of 2014/11/28, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards.

I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.

I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.

I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry.

The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.

I do not hold and have not held and my employer AMEC FOSTER WHEELER AMERICAS LIMITEDdoes not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessmentor risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based

To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSCare true as of 2014/11/28.

By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.

By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, PATRICK DENNIS SHRINER, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2015/03/19:

a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition.

I Agree


Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or AgentThe following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Changeas part of the record of site condition

Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner

Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property

Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired

A Current plan of Survey

Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern

Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property

Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model

Owner or agent certification statements

5.2.6


Request ID: 017438637 Province of Ontario Date Report Produced: 2015/03/19 Demande n˚ : Province de l'Ontario Document produit le : Transaction ID: 57073810 Ministry of Government Services Time Report Produced: 10:06:19 Transaction n˚ : Ministère des Services gouvernementaux Imprimé à : Category ID: CT Catégorie :

CERTIFICATE OF STATUS ATTESTATION DU STATUT JURIDIQUE

This is to certify that according to the D'après les dossiers du Ministère des records of the Ministry of Government Services gouvernementaux, nous attestons Services que la société

Q U E E N S T O N R E S I D E N C E S I N C .

Ontario Corporation Number Numéro matricule de la société (Ontario) 0 0 1 9 2 1 3 0 7 is a corporation incorporated, est une société constituée, prorogée ou née amalgamated or continued under d'une fusion aux termes des lois de la the laws of the Province of Ontario. Province de l'Ontario.

The corporation came into existence on La société a été fondée le A U G U S T 2 0 A O Û T , 2 0 1 4 and has not been dissolved. et n'est pas dissoute.

Dated Fait le M A R C H 1 9 M A R S , 2 0 1 5

Director Directeur

The issuance of this certificate in electronic form is authorized by the

Director of Companies and Personal Property Security Branch.

La dÕlivrance du prÕsent certificat sous forme Õlectronique est autorisÕe par la

Directrice de la Direction des compagnies et des s«retÕs mobiliÒres.

Table of Areas of Potential Environmental Concern 34 & 36 Queenston Street, St. Catharines, ON

Area of Potential Environmental

Concern

Location of APEC on Phase One

Property

Potentially Contaminating

Activity*

Location of PCA

Contaminants of Potential Concern

Media Potentially Impacted

APEC-1: Former buildings

East portion of Phase One Property

30 – Importation of Fill Material of Unknown

Quality On-Site

Metals, Hg, Cr (VI), B (HWS), SAR, EC, CN

Soil

Ground Water

APEC - 2: Former underground storage

tanks

West portion of Phase One Property

28 –Gasoline and associated products

storage in fixed tanks Off-Site PHCs, VOCs

Soil

Ground Water

APEC - 3: Former underground storage

tanks

Northwest portion of Phase One Property

28 –Gasoline and associated products

storage in fixed tanks Off-Site PHCs, VOCs

Soil

Ground Water

*Potentially Contaminating Activity (PCA) described specifically for the site with reference to the applicable item number in the Table of Potentially Contaminating Activities provided in Schedule D of O. Reg. 153/04 as amended, where applicable.

B (HWS) – Boron (Hot Water Soluble)

CN – Cyanide (Free)

Cr (VI) – Hexavalent Chromium

EC – Electrical Conductivity

Hg – Mercury

PHCs – Petroleum Hydrocarbons

VOCs – Volatile Organic Compounds

Table of Current and Past Property Use of Phase One Property – 34 & 36 Queenston Street,St. Catharines, Ontario

Years Name of Owner Description ofProperty Use Property Use Other Observations from Aerial

Photographs, Fire Insurance Plans, etc.

34 Queenston Street

1871 Christian Hick Residential Residential This property use is based on chain of title.

1871-1911 John Rollinson Residential Residential This property use is based on chain of title,city directories, and aerial photographs.

1911-1917 Emily Rollinson Residential ResidentialThis property use is based on chain of title,city directories, the 1913 FIP, and aerialphotographs.

1917-1933 Michael McGuire Residential ResidentialThis property use is based on chain of title,city directories, the 1913 FIP, and aerialphotographs.

1933-1941 Roland McGuire Residential ResidentialThis property use is based on chain of title,city directories, the 1935 FIP, and aerialphotographs.

1941-1944 Cuthbert RolandMcGuire Residential Residential This property use is based on chain of title,

city directories, and aerial photographs.

1944-1971 Joseph (Sr.) andEsther Kirchlechner Residential Residential

The Phase One Property building waspresent in the 1962 FIP, which indicated itwas a Restaurant and residential uses.Various restaurants were listed in the citydirectories between 1950 and 1999, alongwith residential units.

1971-1973 Esther KirchlechnerCommercial

(restaurant) andResidential

Commercial andResidential

The Phase One Property building waspresent in the 1962 FIP, which indicated itwas a Restaurant and residential uses.Various restaurants were listed in the citydirectories between 1950 and 1999, alongwith residential units.

1973-1975Joseph

Kirchlechner Jr.and Isabelle Reid

Commercial(restaurant) and

Residential


The Phase One Property was listed asvarious restaurants in the city directoriesbetween 1950 and 1999, along withresidential units.

1975-2008 Yau Seto and KamSeto

Commercial(restaurant) and

Residential


The Phase One Property was listed asvarious restaurants in the city directoriesbetween 1950 and 1999, along withresidential units.

2008-2009 Sadruddin Halani Residential ResidentialBased on discussions with the Siterepresentative, the Phase One Property wasin use as a multi-unit residential building.

2009-November

2014

QueenstonInvestment

Properties Inc.Residential Residential

Based on discussions with the Siterepresentative, the Phase One Property wasin use as a multi-unit residential building,until approximately September 2014, whenthe building became vacant. Remnants ofthe former restaurant operation were nolonger visit at the time of reconnaissanceand the Site representative was unaware ofwhen the building had been renovated formulti-unit residential use.

November2014 –Present

QueenstonResidences Inc. Residential Residential

Based on discussions with the Siterepresentative, the Phase One Property wasin use as a multi-unit residential building,until approximately September 2014, whenthe building became vacant.

Years Name of Owner Description ofProperty Use Property Use Other Observations from Aerial

Photographs, Fire Insurance Plans, etc.

36 Queenston Street (Lots 3622 and 3623)

1885 Orson Phelps Residential Residential This property use is based on chain of title.

1885-1895 Frederick N.Hara Residential Residential This property use is based on chain of title.

1895-1919 James DouglasResidential and

Community(church)

Residential andCommunity

This property use is based on chain of title,city directories, the 1913 FIP, and aerialphotographs. Based on the city directoriesand the 1935 FIP, a Gospel Hall was presenton the Phase One Property from 1919.

1919-1920 Nellie E.Gadsby


(church)



1920-1936 Leslie GadsbyResidential and

Community(church)



1936-1953 Marion WilsonResidential and

Community(church)



1953-1966

David Silverster,William

Robertson,Vernon McIntee,

John Pirrie,William

Campion, RossMcIntee and

Robert Steele,as trustees


(church)


This property use is based on chain of title,city directories, the 1935 FIP, and aerialphotographs. Based on the city directoriesand the 1935 FIP, a Gospel Hall was presenton the Phase One Property from 1919 to1965.

1966 RobertRedmond

Commercial (retailfurniture and

uniform shops)and Residential


The Phase One Property was occupied bytwo former residential buildings on theeastern portion of the property, whichoperated as mixed commercial andresidential use since 1960.

1966-1978Radio Station

C.H.S.C.Limited

Commercial (retailfurniture and

uniform shopsuntil 1975 and

then radio station)and Residential


The Phase One Property was occupied bytwo former residential buildings on theeastern portion of the property, whichoperated as mixed commercial andresidential use between 1960 and 1975. Theresidential buildings were demolished by theearly 1970s and commercial uses remainedin operation at the Phase One Property untilthe spring of 2014, when 36 QueenstonStreet became vacant.

1978-1990 R.E. RedmondInvestments Inc.

Commercial (radiostation) Commercial

This property use is based on chain of title,city directories, and aerial photographs. ThePhase One Property was in commercial use.

1990-2003Coultis

BroadcastingLimited



36 Queenston Street (Lot 3621)

1874 James Ratcliffe Residential Residential This property use is based on chain of title.

1874-1893 CharlotteGriffiths Residential Residential This property use is based on chain of title.

1893-1927 Bridget CarrollResidential and

Community(church)



1927-1930 John HenryCarroll


(church)



1930-1932 Pierre WatsonResidential and

Community(church)



1932 FrederickParker


(church)



1932 Richard EdwardBoyle


(church)



1932-1932 Eva ZubaturkResidential and

Community(church)



1934-1938 John SoltesResidential and

Community(church)



1938-1940 John and JeanSoltes


(church)



1940-1943 John andMargaret Wician


(church)



1943-1956 Louis andKatalin Kolmer


(church)



1956-1959

EdmundPolgrabia and

ZbigniewAntkowiak


(church)



1959-1977Edmund and

PelogiaPolgrabia


(church)



1977-1992 Radio StationC.H.S.C



1992-2003 CoultisBroadcasting



36 Queenston Street (Lots 3619 and 3620)

1893 Eliza Durham Residential Residential This property use is based on chain of title.

1893-1895 John Morrison Residential Residential This property use is based on chain of title.

1895-1903George Hill

Residential Residential This property use is based on chain of title.

1903 Henry Haird Residential Residential This property use is based on chain of title.

1903 Richard Boyle Residential Residential This property use is based on chain of title.

1903-1941 John O’BrienResidential and

Community(church)


This property use is based on chain of title,city directories, the 1913 and 1935 FIPs, andaerial photographs. Based on the citydirectories and the 1935 FIP, a Gospel Hallwas present on the Phase One Propertyfrom 1919.

1941-1972 Albert KrolResidential and

Community(church)



1972-1973 Sheila ZumpeResidential and

Community(church)



1973-1976 NancyRichmond


(church)



1976-1978 Diane SchielResidential and

Community(church)



1978 Radio StationC.H.S.C.



1978-1990 R.E. RedmondInvestments Inc.



1990-2003Coultis

BroadcastingLimited



36 Queenston Street (All Lots)

2003

QueenstonProperties Inc.

(CoultisBroadcastingLimited went

bankrupt)



2009-2006 725410 OntarioInc.



2006 1718295Ontario Inc.



2006-2007 725410 OntarioInc.



2007-2008 RushBrandstein



2008 Stipan GroupInc.



2008-2010Golden GateRealty, St.

Catharines Inc.

Commercial(realtor and retail

sales)Commercial


2010-2013 New CityProperties Ltd.


sales)Commercial


2013-November

2014

2118033Ontario Ltd.


sales)Commercial


November2014-Present

QueenstonResidences Inc.


sales)Commercial

Based on discussions with the Siterepresentative, the Phase One Property wasmost recently in commercial use (i.e., radiostation) until the spring of 2014, when 36Queenston Street became vacant.

The Phase Two CSM is provided below:

Regulatory Requirement Phase Two Property Information

i. Areas where potentially contaminating activity has occurred, areas of potential environmental concern and subsurface structures and utilities that may affect contaminant distribution and transport.

The location of the Phase One and Two Property is shown in Figure 1. Based on the findings of the Phase One ESA, three APECs and PCAs are associated with the Phase Two Property (Figure 8) due to historical in-filling and former retail fuel outlets (RFOs) west and northwest of the Phase Two Property. As discussed above, based on the findings of the Phase One ESA, PCAs and APECs associated with the property are as follows (Figure 8):

- APEC #1 – Former buildings on east portion of Phase Two Property (#30 - importation of fill material of unknown quality);

- APEC #2 – West portion of the Phase Two Property from former USTs west of the Phase Two Property (#28 - gasoline and associated products storage in fixed tanks); and

- APEC #3 – Northwest portion of the Phase Two Property from former USTs northwest of the Phase Two Property (#28 - gasoline and associated products storage in fixed tanks).

APEC#1 was addressed by sampling the soil and/or ground water in BH3, BH5 and BH/MW7 as well as testpits TP1 to TP8 for contaminants of concern including metals, EC, SAR, cyanide (free), mercury, PHCs and /or VOCs. APEC#2 and APEC#3 were addressed by sampling the soil and/or ground water in BH/MW1 and BH2 for contaminants of concern associated with the former RFOs located off-Site including PHCs and VOCs. These APEC/PCA’s are inferred to be regionally transgradient to the Phase Two Property. Subsurface features that may affect contaminant distribution at the Phase Two Property include inactive natural gas, hydro, telephone, sanitary sewer and water lines from Queenston Street to the north end of the Site (associated with residential and commercial buildings) as depicted on Figure 2. The relative water level elevation of the geologic unit ranged from 101.30 metres above sea level (mASL) (BH/MW7) to 106.86 mASL (BH/MW1). The inferred ground water flow within the native silty clay/clayey silt/sandy silt till is inferred to be easterly (Figure 5).

ii. Description and figures illustrating the physical setting of the property including, stratigraphy, hydrogeological characteristics, depth to bedrock, depth to water table, aspect related to Section 41 or 43.1 that apply to the property, areas where soil has been brought onto the property, location of any proposed buildings.

The stratigraphy at the Phase Two Property is depicted on the cross sections (Figures 3 and 4) and in general, the subsurface conditions consisted of asphalt (BH/MW1, BH3, BH/MW4, BH5, BH/MW6, TP1 to TP12) or granular surface (BH2) over granular to depths of up to 0.3 metres below ground surface (mbgs) over silty sand fill in BH2, BH3, BH/MW4, BH5 and BH/MW6 to depths ranging from 0.9 to 2.2 mbgs (BH/MW6) or sand fill TP1 to TP12 to 0.5 to 1.0 mbgs overlying sand and gravel to depths ranging from 4.1 to 5.6 mbgs overlying silty clay/clayey silt (with the exception of BH5) to depth (in boreholes only). Concrete and brick pieces were noted in the fill material in BH3, TP5, TP6, TP7 and TP8 and trace ceramics were noted in TP1. The testpits were not extended to native soil. No deleterious materials were noted in the boreholes. Visual or olfactory evidence of environmental impacts were not observed by Amec Foster Wheeler during the drilling or testpitting program. Combustible Organic Vapour (COV) and Total Organic Vapour (TOV) concentration headspace measurements recorded in the soil samples collected from the boreholes were non-detectable.


Two buildings are present on-Site including a residential dwelling and a commercial building, both located at the west end of the Phase Two Property. The owner will construct a multi-unit residential building but the plan for the new building is not finalized. The buildings will be demolished prior to construction of the residential multi-unit building. Both buildings were not located in the areas with Contaminants of Concern (COCs) and therefore, on-Site vapour intrusion is not considered a concern at the Phase Two Property. A former building was present at the east end of the Phase Two Property and fill material of unknown source and quality was historically imported to the Site. No other soil has been brought from another property to the Phase Two property. The overburden in the vicinity of the Phase Two Property is interpreted to consist of glaciolacustrine deposits of sand, gravelly sand and gravel (i.e., nearshore and beach deposits) (“Quaternary Geology of Southern Ontario”, map 2556, Ontario Geological Survey, 1991). Bedrock is anticipated to be of the Upper Ordovician Age consisting of shale, limestone, dolostone and siltstone of the Queenston Formation (“Bedrock Geology of Ontario”, Ontario Geological Survey, 1991). Bedrock is anticipated to be encountered at a depth of at least 45 mbgs (“Niagara Sheet Southern Ontario Drift Thickness”, Preliminary Map No. P. 537, Ontario Department

of Mines, 1969). Bedrock was not encountered during drilling. The regional ground water flow direction, based on topographic features and knowledge gained from other sites in the area, is expected to be to the south toward the Old Welland Canal. Locally, however, the shallow ground water flow may be influenced by underground utility trenches, conduits, and structures, variations in soil type, and minor fluctuations in topography. As shown in Figure 5, the interpreted ground water flow is easterly based on hydrogeological testing. The Phase Two Property is not located within or within 30 m of an Area of Natural Significance which would classify it as a sensitive site under O. Reg. 153/04, as amended. AMEC visited the websites of the City of St. Catharines’ Official Plan and the Government of Ontario’s Ontario Heritage Properties Database and searched for natural heritage plans or protected site maps. The Phase Two Property does not appear to have been designated as a protected area. There are no conditions that would apply to the Phase Two Property under Section 41 (Environmentally Sensitive Areas) or Section 43.1 does not apply as the Phase Two Property is not a shallow soil property. The pH was within the applicable ranges for surface and subsurface soils for use of the Table 3 SCS.

The water level measurements undertaken in BH/MW1, BH/MW4, BH/MW6, and BH/MW7 on January 6, 2015 ranged from 4.40 to 9.85 mbgs. The relative water level elevation of the geologic unit ranged from 101.30 mASL (BH/MW7) to 106.86 mASL (BH/MW1). The inferred ground water flow within the native silty clay/clayey silt/sandy silt till is inferred to be easterly (Figure 5). The estimated hydraulic conductivities of BH/MW1, BH/MW4 and BH/MW6/BH/MW7 were 1 x 10-5 metres per second (m/s), 1 x 10-8 m/s and 2 x 10-

11 m/s, respectively. The horizontal hydraulic gradient is 0.75 m/m based on the water levels measured on January 6, 2015. The vertical hydraulic gradient was not measured as there was only one geologic unit.

The standards used for the identification of COCs were Table 3 SCS for use in a non-potable ground water condition, residential/parkland/institutional and coarse textured soils.


iii. Contaminants on the Site The contaminants located on the Phase Two Property and their origin are as follows:

Metals (mercury and lead) in BH3 (lead), TP5 (lead), TP6 (lead), TP8 (lead) and BH5 (mercury) and TP3 (mercury) and EC in BH3, TP5 and TP6 associated with the historical in-filling on the Phase Two Property.

The concentrations of metals and EC are attributed to the historical in-filling on-Site with fill material of unknown quality. The migration of the contaminants away from any APEC via a preferential pathway is not likely as the contaminants of concern are not considered mobile. Furthermore, there were no exceedances of the Table 3 SCS for metals, VOCs and PHCs were noted in ground water in the Phase Two ESA. There are no contaminants discharging to the natural environment. Contaminants that exceeded the Table 3 SCS on the Site in soil are depicted on Figures 3, 4 and 6. The COCs in soil are likely attributed to the historical infilling of former buildings on the Phase Two property. The estimated and actual horizontal and vertical distribution of the contaminants in each area is indicated on Figures 3, 4A, 4B, 6, 6A, 6B and 6C. Based on the soil analytical results from the Phase Two ESA, a SRP was completed at the Site. The horizontal and vertical delineation of COCs and the distribution of metals, EC and mercury exceeding Table 3 SCS on-Site (Figures 3, 4A, 4B, 6, 6A, 6B and 6C) correspond to the locations of the former on-site buildings. The sample analysis in ground water are indicated on Figure 7. Based on the borehole locations and the area of the former building, the separation distance between boreholes with no Table 3 SCS exceedances and boreholes with Table 3 SCS exceedances, AMEC estimated the amount of metal and EC-impacted soil required to be removed for off-Site disposal to be 89 tonnes. Based on actual field observations and lab results, a SRP was completed at the Site and included the removal of approximately 241.37 tonnes of metals-impacted soil to a Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) licensed landfill (Niagara Waste Systems Limited landfill in Thorold, ON). Confirmatory soil sampling at the limits of the soil remediation excavations were below the Table 3 SCS for the COCs [metals and EC]. The locations of the confirmatory samples are indicated on Figures 3 and 4 in the soil remediation report. The remedial excavations walls were sloped and were not backfilled at the time of the SRP. The transport of these COCs in the surface would be influenced by seasonal fluctuations in ground water elevation as well as the underground utilities and are not expected to have had a significant effect on the horizontal and vertical distribution of contaminants.

iv. Cross-Sections and distribution of contaminants, depth to water, stratigraphy, subsurface structures or utilities affecting distribution. For areas of contamination, release mechanisms, transport pathways, receptors, exposure points and routes of exposure.

The cross-sections provided on Figures 3, 4A and 4B identify the depth to water (ranged from 4.40 to 9.85 mbgs), stratigraphy (fill over native sand and gravel over native silty clay/clayey silt) and that there are no significant subsurface features that affect distribution of contaminants. The horizontal and vertical distribution of contaminants is indicated in Figures 3, 4A, 4B, 6, 6A, 6B and 6C. Figures 9 and 10 illustrate the Human Health and Ecological Exposure Conceptual Models. The models are described as follows: Source: The source of the COCs at the Site (metals, EC) is historical infilling on-Site. Potential Release Mechanism:

Wind Erosion


Uptake by Plants and Intake by Prey

Contaminant Transport Pathways (exposure route); Dermal Contact, Stem/Foliar Contact Ingestion Inhalation of airborne particles Ingestion by Plants and Prey

Human and Ecological Receptors: Potential human receptors include future residents and visitors and construction workers and potential ecological receptors include terrestrial plants, invertebrates, mammals and birds. Receptor Exposure Points: Human exposure (resident, visitor) to COCs in soil via dermal contact, ingestion, inhalation of airborne particles. No contaminants were found in ground water and no complete exposure pathway is present. Ecological exposure (terrestrial plants) anticipated through root update and inhalation via wind erosion. The exposure to COCs by terrestrial invertebrates is expected through soil ingestion and dermal contact. The exposure to COCs of terrestrial mammals and birds is expected through soil ingestion, dermal contact, ingestion of plants and prey and inhalation via wind erosion. No contaminants were found in ground water and no complete exposure pathway is present.

0APPROXIMATE SCALE IN METRES

5 10 20

BH-2

BH/MW-1BH-3

BH/MW-4

BH/MW-6

BH-5

H H H H H H H H H H H H HH

HH

HH

HH

HH

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

TBM

AA'

B

B'

TP3

TP4

TP1

TP2

TP8

TP7

TP5

TP6

TP9

TP10

TP11

TP12

AREA #1

AREA #2

BT

GG

WS

AN

W

SA

N

BH/MW-7

H

N

QUEENSTON RESIDENCES INC.CLIENT:

BOREHOLE, TESPIT & MONITORINGWELL LOCATION PLAN

TITLE:

PROJECT:RD

MP

SCALE:

CHK'D BY:

DWN BY:

DATUM:NAD83

PROJECTION:UTM Zone 17

As Shown

ADATE:

PROJECT NO:

REV. NO.:

FIGURE 2

TG141138NO. :

MARCH 2015

REFERENCE: Base plan provided by Golden Horseshoe MapsFOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY

BH-2

BH/MW-1

LEGEND:

TBM

APPROXIMATE PROPERTYBOUNDARY

WATER LINE

SANITARY SEWER LINE

NATURAL GAS LINE

HYDRO LINE

BELL CONDUIT

BOREHOLE LOCATION

BOREHOLE WITH MONITORINGWELL LOCATION

TEMPORARY BENCHMARK

TESTPIT LOCATION

CROSS SECTION

ESTIMATED SOIL REMEDIATIONEXCAVATION LOCATIONS

ACTUAL SOIL REMEDIATIONEXCAVATION LOCATIONS (NOV.2014)

W

SAN

G

H

Amec Foster WheelerEnvironment & Infrastructure

3300 Merrittville Hwy, Unit 5Thorold, Ontario

PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTALSITE ASSESSMENT

34-36 QUEENSTON STREETST. CATHARINES, ONTARIO

BT

tracy.wolowidnek

Typewritten Text

0APPROXIMATE SCALE IN METRES

5 10 20

BH-2

BH/MW-1BH-3

BH/MW-4

BH/MW-6

BH-5

H H H H H H H H H H H H HH

HH

HH

HH

HH

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

TBM

TP3

TP4

TP1

TP2

TP8

TP7

TP5

TP6

TP9

TP10

TP11

TP12

AREA #1

AREA #2

BT

GG

WS

AN

W

SA

N

106.62

103.63

106.86

BH/MW-7101.30

H

N


INTERPRETED GROUND WATER FLOWPLAN (JANUARY 6, 2015)

TITLE:

PROJECT:RD

MP

SCALE:

CHK'D BY:

DWN BY:

DATUM:NAD83


As Shown

ADATE:

PROJECT NO:

REV. NO.:

FIGURE 5

TG141138NO. :

MARCH 2015

REFERENCE: Base plan provided by Golden Horseshoe MapsFOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY



PHASE TWO ENVIRONMENTALSITE ASSESSMENT

34-36 QUEENSTON STREETST. CATHARINES, ONTARIO

BH-2

BH/MW-1

LEGEND:

TBM

APPROXIMATE PROPERTYBOUNDARY

WATER LINE

SANITARY SEWER LINE

NATURAL GAS LINE

HYDRO LINE

BELL CONDUIT

BOREHOLE LOCATION

BOREHOLE WITH MONITORINGWELL LOCATION

TEMPORARY BENCHMARK

TESTPIT LOCATION

ESTIMATED SOIL REMEDIATIONEXCAVATION LOCATIONS

ACTUAL SOIL REMEDIATIONEXCAVATION LOCATIONS (NOV.2014)

INTERPRETED GROUND WATERFLOW

W

SAN

G

H

BT

SourceHistorical Site

Infilling &Off-Site

Former USTs

Receptor

Chemicalsof Concern(COCs) in

Soil(metals, EC

notedduringSRP)

Dermal Contact and Ingestion

Inhalation (airborne particles)

Exposure RouteRelease and Transport

Wind Erosion

Con

stru

ctio

nW

orke

r

Project No.: TG141138

Amec Foster WheelerEnvironment & Infrastructure3300 Merrittville Hwy, Unit 5Thorold, Ontario, Canada, L2V 4Y6 Date: January 2015

Yes

Yes

COCs inGround

Water (noimpactsnoted)

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

Res

iden

ts

Vis

itor

s

Figure 9: Human Health Conceptual Model34 & 36 Queenston Street, St. Catharines, ON

Inhalation (indoor andoutdoor air)

Volatilization (volatiles only) NoNo No

Dermal Contact and Ingestion NoNo No

Legend: Yes – complete exposure pathway; No – incomplete exposure pathway (no receptor present); NA – not applicable.

Amec Foster WheelerEnvironment & Infrastructure3300 Merrittville Hwy, Unit 5Thorold, Ontario, Canada, L2V 4Y6

Legend: Yes – complete exposure pathway; NA – Not applicable / incomplete exposure pathway.

Figure 10: Ecological Conceptual Model34 & 36 Queenston Street, St. Catharines, ON

Project No.: TG141138 Date: January 2015

Chemicals ofConcern

(COCs) inSoil (metals,

EC notedduring SRP)

Soil Ingestion

Root Uptake/Dermal Contact

Ingestion of Plants and PreyUptake by Plants and Intake by Prey

NA

SourceHistoricalInfilling &

Off-SiteUSTs

Receptors and Complete ExposurePathways

Exposure RouteRelease and Transport

Ter

rest

rial

Bir

ds

Ter

rest

rial

Mam

mal

s

Ter

rest

rial

Inve

rteb

rate

s

Ter

rest

rial

Pla

nts

Yes Yes

Yes Yes

NA NA Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Aqu

atic

NA

NA

NA

COCs inGroundwater– no impacts

Stem and Foliar Contact

Ingestion of Plants and PreyUptake by Plants and Intake by Prey

NA NA NA

NA NA NA

NA

NA NA

NA

Dermal / Direct ContactNA NA NA NA NA

Inhalation

Stem and Foliar Contact

Yes NA Yes

NA NAYes

Yes

NA

NA

NA

Wind Erosion

Volatilization (volatiles only)Ambient Air

InhalationNA NA NA NA NA

9.5m

16.2m

5.0m

16.2m

1.4m

1.2m

5.0m

1.4m

17.0m

1.4m

1.2m

9.5m

1.2m

1-7

1-4& DUP-A

1-5

1-11

1-3 1-9

1-1

1-6

NORTH WALL

W E

SOUTH WALLE W

EAST WALL S N

WEST WALL N S

FLOOR

7.0m


CONFIRMATORY SAMPLE LOCATION PLANREMEDIAL EXCAVATION AREA 1

TITLE:

PROJECT:DG

PS

SCALE:

CHK'D BY:

DWN BY:

DATUM:NAD83


As Shown



ADATE:

PROJECT NO:

REV. NO.:

FIGURE 3

TG141155NO. :

JANUARY 2015

FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY

SOIL REMEDIATION PROGRAMPROPOSED STUDENT RESIDENCE

34-36 QUEENSTON STREETST. CATHARINES, ON

1-1

LEGEND

Soil Sample submitted for laboratory analysis

3.5m

1.2m

1.2m

3.0m

1.2m

3.5m

1.2m

3.0m

3.5m

3.0m

FLOOR

WEST WALL EAST WALL

NORTH WALL

SOUTH WALL WE

EW

SNNS

2-1

2-2

2-5& DUP-B

2-6

TP 1 TP 2

TP 4


CONFIRMATORY SAMPLE LOCATION PLANREMEDIAL EXCAVATION AREA 2

TITLE:

PROJECT:DG

PS

SCALE:

CHK'D BY:

DWN BY:

DATUM:NAD83


As Shown



ADATE:

PROJECT NO:

REV. NO.:

FIGURE 4

TG141155NO. :

JANUARY 2015

FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY

SOIL REMEDIATION PROGRAMPROPOSED STUDENT RESIDENCE

34-36 QUEENSTON STREETST. CATHARINES, ON

1-1

LEGEND

Soil Sample submitted for laboratory analysis

Test Pit from Phase II ESATP 1

Record of Site Condition # 217367 Record of Site Condition Under ...

Documents

Transcript of Record of Site Condition # 217367 Record of Site Condition Under ...