Recommendations for Adverse Event Monitoring Programs for ... · Adverse Event Monitoring Programs...
Transcript of Recommendations for Adverse Event Monitoring Programs for ... · Adverse Event Monitoring Programs...
LSRO Life Sciences Research OfficeLife Sciences Research Office
RecommendationsRecommendationsfor for
Adverse EventAdverse EventMonitoring Programs Monitoring Programs
for for Dietary SupplementsDietary Supplements
Catherine J. Klein, PhD, RD, CNSDCatherine J. Klein, PhD, RD, CNSDNovember 2, 2004November 2, 2004
Life Sciences Research OfficeLife Sciences Research Office
NonNon--profit 501(c)(3) scientific organizationprofit 501(c)(3) scientific organizationAffiliated with scientific societies Affiliated with scientific societies ((e.ge.g., ASNS, ASPET, ISRTP, APS, ASIP, ASCN)., ASNS, ASPET, ISRTP, APS, ASIP, ASCN)
Independent, objectiveIndependent, objectiveComprehensive reviews by expert panels, Comprehensive reviews by expert panels, authoritative reportsauthoritative reports
LSRO
SponsorSponsor
Metabolife International, Inc. Metabolife International, Inc. (San Diego, CA),(San Diego, CA),
through its counsel,through its counsel,Patton Boggs, L.L.P. Patton Boggs, L.L.P.
(Washington, DC)(Washington, DC)
TerminologyTerminology
Adverse Event (AE)Adverse Event (AE)Individual Data Record of AEIndividual Data Record of AESignal (pairing of product with AE )Signal (pairing of product with AE )Postmarket SurveillancePostmarket Surveillance
Potential Sources of Risk Potential Sources of Risk from Dietary Supplementsfrom Dietary Supplements
Unexpected product effectsUnexpected product effectsReactions to product/ingredientsReactions to product/ingredientsSupplement interactions with drugs, disease, and Supplement interactions with drugs, disease, and lifestyle factors lifestyle factors
Contaminated/mislabeled raw materialsContaminated/mislabeled raw materialsProblems introduced during manufacture, Problems introduced during manufacture, distribution, storagedistribution, storageTamperingTamperingMisuse by consumerMisuse by consumer
Challenges to MonitoringChallenges to MonitoringDietary SupplementsDietary Supplements
No federal guidanceNo federal guidanceHeterogeneous dietary supplementsHeterogeneous dietary supplementsManufacturer experiences differManufacturer experiences differTraditional and alternative distributionTraditional and alternative distributionConsumer complaints Consumer complaints vsvs. medical reports. medical reports
Recommendations for Recommendations for Adverse Event Monitoring Programs Adverse Event Monitoring Programs
for Dietary Supplementsfor Dietary Supplements
PurposePurposeTo provide scientific advice on how To provide scientific advice on how surveillance programs can be tailored surveillance programs can be tailored to monitor the safety of dietary supplementsto monitor the safety of dietary supplements
Expert PanelExpert Panel
Catherine St. Hilaire, Ph.D. Catherine St. Hilaire, Ph.D. (Chair)(Chair)John A. Clark, M.D., MSPH John A. Clark, M.D., MSPH Barbara Crouch, Pharm.D., MSPH Barbara Crouch, Pharm.D., MSPH Janet Greger, Ph.D. Janet Greger, Ph.D. Robert Hoerr, M.D., Ph.D.Robert Hoerr, M.D., Ph.D.Valen Johnson, Ph.D.Valen Johnson, Ph.D.D. Warner North, Ph.D. D. Warner North, Ph.D.
ProcessProcess
Review and compare federal and industry Review and compare federal and industry data recordsdata recordsEvaluate the usefulness of records for Evaluate the usefulness of records for generating signalsgenerating signalsReview other surveillance programsReview other surveillance programsRecommend monitoring system for dietary Recommend monitoring system for dietary supplementssupplements
Sample Databases of Ephedrine Sample Databases of Ephedrine AlkaloidAlkaloid--Containing SupplementsContaining Supplements
FDA MET 356
MedWatchMedWatch-- calls, calls, letters, FAX, emailletters, FAX, emailAE & ephedrineAE & ephedrine--alkaloid supplementalkaloid supplementStandardized formsStandardized formsLSRO sample: n=200 LSRO sample: n=200 of 1800 records
Customer service Customer service telephone linetelephone lineAE & ephedraAE & ephedra--supplementsupplementStandardized formStandardized formLSRO sample: n=200 LSRO sample: n=200 of 14,000+ recordsof 1800 records of 14,000+ records
FDA Database RecordsFDA Database Records
Incoming ReportIncoming ReportAffidavitsAffidavitsLabel Sample Label Sample Outpatient Medical ReportsOutpatient Medical ReportsER/Urgent Care RecordsER/Urgent Care RecordsHospital Record SummariesHospital Record SummariesHospital Medical NotesHospital Medical NotesHospital Surgical ReportsHospital Surgical ReportsOther (Other (e.g.,e.g., Autopsy Report)Autopsy Report)
MET Database Record FormMET Database Record Form
Caller contact info & date
Product user age, height, weight
Daily dose & duration
Intake of water, caffeine, diet
Check-list of health complaints
Check-list of recommendations
Additional comments
Functional Steps Functional Steps in Postmarket Surveillancein Postmarket Surveillance
Recognize & report AERecognize & report AECreate individual data recordsCreate individual data recordsBuild a relational databaseBuild a relational databaseSignal from databases & other sourcesSignal from databases & other sourcesInvestigate signalInvestigate signalResolve issues & formulate risk management Resolve issues & formulate risk management interventionsinterventions
Only a fraction of AE Only a fraction of AE are recognized and reportedare recognized and reported
AEreported
AE recognizedReport
of non-event
AE occurs after exposure
Dietary supplement use
Adverse reactionto dietary
supplement
Adverse reactionAdverse reactionto dietaryto dietary
supplementsupplement
AE due to chanceAE due to chanceAE due to chance
(Modified from Siev, Adv Vet Med, 1999)
Signaling from a DatabaseSignaling from a Database
Signal EvaluationSignal Evaluation
Individual Data Records
“Interesting”AE-product
relationships
Reliableand
Accurate
Serious
Detected Signals
Signal PrioritizationSignal Prioritization Case-Series
Signal DetectionSignal Detection
Signal DetectionSignal Detection
Individual Data Records
“Interesting”AE-product
relationships
““Interesting” Interesting” productproduct--AE relationshipsAE relationships
••New, unexpected relationshipNew, unexpected relationship••Change in relationship over timeChange in relationship over time
••Volume/rateVolume/rate•• intensity of AEintensity of AE
••Comparison to other productsComparison to other products
MethodsMethods••CaseCase--byby--case inspectioncase inspection••Automated detectionAutomated detection
Information for Signal DetectionInformation for Signal Detection**
FDA MET 356FDA MET 356(n=200) (n=200)(n=200) (n=200)
98% 96%1. Identifier for product
user
2. Determine if AE
3. Determine if supplement use was prior to AE
4. Dated
98% 96%
Individual Data Records
“Interesting”AE-product
relationships
*Records meeting all four criteria
Signal PrioritizationSignal Prioritization
Signal PrioritizationSignal Prioritization
Individual Data Records
“Interesting”AE-product
relationships
Reliableand
Accurate
Serious
Detected Signals
Signal DetectionSignal Detection
Signal PrioritizationSignal Prioritization
Serious (FDA)
Disability
Hospitalization
Life-threatening
Fatal
Reproductive AE
Signal PrioritizationSignal Prioritization
Individual Data Records
“Interesting”AE-product
relationships
Reliableand
Accurate
Serious
Detected Signals
Signal DetectionSignal Detection
Information for Signal PrioritizationInformation for Signal Prioritization**
Reliability & Reliability & AccuracyAccuracy
FDAFDA(n=200) 98 %(n=200) 98 %
MET 356MET 356(n=200) 15 %
Reliableand
Accurate
Serious
Detected Signals
SeriousSerious
FDAFDA(n=200) 79 %(n=200) 79 %
MET 356MET 356(n=200) 7 %(n=200) 7 %(n=200) 15 %
*Records having sufficient information to determine reliability,accuracy and whether or not event was serious.
Signal EvaluationSignal Evaluation
Signal EvaluationSignal Evaluation
Individual Data Records
“Interesting”AE-product
relationships
Reliableand
Accurate
Serious
Detected Signals
Signal PrioritizationSignal Prioritization Case-Series
Signal DetectionSignal Detection
Information for Signal EvaluationInformation for Signal Evaluation
FDA MET 356
Medication + +
Time to onset + +
Gender & Age + -
Medical history + -
Reason for use + -
Daily dose - +
Batch/lot # - -
Other supplement - -
Rechallenge - -
Signal EvaluationSignal Evaluation
Case-Series
Principal Findings Principal Findings from Industry and Federal Examplefrom Industry and Federal Example
FDA & MET records adequate for detectionFDA & MET records adequate for detectionFDA records were more informative than FDA records were more informative than MET records for prioritization and evaluation MET records for prioritization and evaluation (MET not designed to generate signals) (MET not designed to generate signals) Because databases contained information of Because databases contained information of value for signal generation it is likely that signals value for signal generation it is likely that signals (hypotheses) worthy of investigation would arise (hypotheses) worthy of investigation would arise if developed in context of surveillance system if developed in context of surveillance system having LSRO recommended featureshaving LSRO recommended features
Surveillance ProgramsSurveillance Programs
NutraSweetNutraSweetAspartameAspartame
Procter & Gamble, FritoProcter & Gamble, Frito--LayLayOlestraOlestra
FDA MedWatchFDA MedWatchDrugs, Dietary supplementsDrugs, Dietary supplements
Poison Control CentersPoison Control CentersDietary supplementsDietary supplements
World Health OrganizationWorld Health OrganizationHerbal productsHerbal products
Anecdotal aspartame complaints Anecdotal aspartame complaints
after introduction into marketafter introduction into market
*
*
*
**
*
*
*#
#
##
#
## #
# # ##
#
(Butchko (Butchko et alet al. Reg Tox Pharmacol, 1994). Reg Tox Pharmacol, 1994)
Effect of negative news reports on Effect of negative news reports on anecdotal aspartame complaintsanecdotal aspartame complaints
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Janua
ryFeb
ruar
yMar
ch
April
May
June
July
August
Septem
ber
October
Novem
berDec
ember Medical
ComplaintTotals
(Butchko (Butchko et alet al. . Reg Tox Pharmacol,Reg Tox Pharmacol, 2002)2002)
Gender difference in AE reportingGender difference in AE reportingrates rates (per 100,000 population) (per 100,000 population) to FDA for to FDA for
consumerconsumer--reported events reported events (1998(1998--2001)2001)
0
10
20
30
40
50<5 5-9
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
70-74
75-79
80-84
85-89
90-94
95-99
>100
Age Range
Rep
ortin
g R
ate
MALESFEMALES
0
10
20
30
40
50<5 5-9
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
70-74
75-79
80-84
85-89
90-94
95-99
>100
Age Range
Rep
ortin
g R
ate
MALESFEMALES*
*
**
*
*
*
*
(Clark J.A. Galt Associates, Inc., Sterling, VA, 2003)(Clark J.A. Galt Associates, Inc., Sterling, VA, 2003)
Human Exposures
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
6000
6500
7000
7500
8000
1/1/2000 7/1/2000 12/30/2000 6/30/2001 12/29/2001 6/29/2002 12/28/2002
Cas
es/D
ay
WeekdaysWeekends
Poisonous Substances (reports/day)Poisonous Substances (reports/day)
(Watson (Watson et al.,et al., Am J Emergency Med, 2003)Am J Emergency Med, 2003)
Pesticides (reports/day)Pesticides (reports/day)
Pesticide Exposures
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
6/15/1994 10/28/1995 3/11/1997 7/24/1998 12/6/1999 4/19/2001 9/1/2002 1/14/2004
Cas
es p
er d
ay, a
ll ag
es, a
ll ro
utes
(American Assoc. Poison Control Centers, 2003)(American Assoc. Poison Control Centers, 2003)
Recommendations for Recommendations for Adverse Event Monitoring Programs Adverse Event Monitoring Programs
for Dietary Supplementsfor Dietary Supplements
LSRO recommends how AE can be collected, LSRO recommends how AE can be collected, documented, organized, and analyzeddocumented, organized, and analyzed
LSRO specifies the minimal requirements of an LSRO specifies the minimal requirements of an effective AE monitoring program for dietary effective AE monitoring program for dietary supplementssupplements
(Handout notes(Handout notes--not in slides)not in slides)
Recommended Reporting & Intake ProcessesRecommended Reporting & Intake Processes
Collect via common transmissionsCollect via common transmissionsUserUser--friendly, simple, and concise for all friendly, simple, and concise for all geographic areasgeographic areasSafeguard confidential dataSafeguard confidential dataTrained customer service representatives Trained customer service representatives
Available 24Available 24--hr, 365 days/yearhr, 365 days/year
(Handout notes(Handout notes--not in slides)not in slides)
Recommendations for CreationRecommendations for Creationof Individual Data Recordsof Individual Data Records
Standardized questionnaire form Standardized questionnaire form Collect data useful for detecting, prioritizing, and Collect data useful for detecting, prioritizing, and evaluating signalsevaluating signalsFollow up missing relevant dataFollow up missing relevant dataSkilled data coding and entrySkilled data coding and entryTrack status of recordTrack status of recordSupervision of medical evaluationSupervision of medical evaluationSecure & accessible source materials Secure & accessible source materials
Recommended Reporting ProcessRecommended Reporting Process& Creation of Data Records& Creation of Data Records
Paper Based ProcessPaper Based Process
CodeLog
Write Up Report
Incoming Call, Facsimile, Mail, or Electronic Form Enter Data
Verify
Review
Electronic ProcessElectronic ProcessIncoming Call, Facsimile, Mail, or Electronic Form
Verify ReviewAutomated logging
and notification of receipt
Computer-assisted write-up, coding, and data entry
(Graphic modified from (Graphic modified from FaichFaich, 2003), 2003)
Minimal Data for Signal DetectionMinimal Data for Signal Detectionfor Dietary Supplementsfor Dietary Supplements
Purpose of complaint Purpose of complaint (AE (AE vs.vs. product quality only)product quality only)
Date of AE complaintDate of AE complaintProduct exposure prior to AEProduct exposure prior to AEVerbatim description of AEVerbatim description of AEProduct identifierProduct identifierContact info for individual reporting AEContact info for individual reporting AEIdentifier for product userIdentifier for product user
Additional Data for Signal PrioritizationAdditional Data for Signal Prioritizationand Signal Evaluationand Signal Evaluation
Relationship of caller to userRelationship of caller to userContact info for product userContact info for product userAdditional product infoAdditional product infoWhy and how product usedWhy and how product usedDate of first exposureDate of first exposureFollow up with health care providerFollow up with health care provider**
Follow up clinical course Follow up clinical course Etiological dataEtiological dataReproductive statusReproductive statusDemographic and confounding factorsDemographic and confounding factors
*Patient consent required
Recommendations for DatabaseRecommendations for Databaseand Signaling Processand Signaling Process
Secure data exchange between internal and Secure data exchange between internal and external databasesexternal databasesSignaling process should be designed and Signaling process should be designed and managed by professionalsmanaged by professionalsTimely reviews and analysesTimely reviews and analysesFurther investigationsFurther investigations
Recommendations for Recommendations for Issues Resolution & Risk ManagementIssues Resolution & Risk Management
Formulate signal that can be assessed for public Formulate signal that can be assessed for public health impacthealth impactTake action to protect public healthTake action to protect public healthInform FDA of new, serious AEInform FDA of new, serious AE--product product relationshipsrelationshipsInform product users about new findingsInform product users about new findings
Recommendations for Recommendations for Quality Assurance & OversightQuality Assurance & Oversight
Ensure high quality data Ensure high quality data are collected, secured, are collected, secured, & processed expediently & processed expediently without errorwithout error
Evaluate objective Evaluate objective performance measures of performance measures of programprogram
Recommended EnhancementsRecommended Enhancements
Determine barriers to submission of AEDetermine barriers to submission of AEDirect electronic data entry with logicDirect electronic data entry with logicReference databases Reference databases (ingredient, product)(ingredient, product)
IndustryIndustry--wide relational database of records for wide relational database of records for interinter--product signalingproduct signalingCollaborate with surveillance expertsCollaborate with surveillance expertsOversight by independent expertsOversight by independent experts
Findings EmphasizedFindings Emphasized
Evidence of causality is not required for Evidence of causality is not required for signal detectionsignal detectionQualified operators are needed to implement Qualified operators are needed to implement quality systemsquality systemsProspective studies help understand the Prospective studies help understand the productproduct--event relationshipevent relationshipSurveillance programs by industry can Surveillance programs by industry can complement federal programscomplement federal programs
Citations for GraphicsCitations for Graphics
American Association of Poison Control Centers, Inc. (2003) (UnPub).Butchko, H. H., Tschanz, C. & Kotsonis, F. N. (1994) Postmarketing surveillance of food additives. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 20: 105-118. Butchko, H. H., Stargel, W. W., Comer, C. P., Mayhew, D. A., Benninger, C., Blackburn, G. L., de Sonneville, L. M., Geha, R. S., Hertelendy, Z., Koestner, A., Leon, A. S., Liepa, G. U., McMartin, K. E., Mendenhall, C. L., Munro, I. C., Novotny, E. J., Renwick, A. G., Schiffman, S. S., Schomer, D. L., Shaywitz, B. A., Spiers, P. A., Tephly, T. R., Thomas, J. A. & Trefz, F. K. (2002) Aspartame: review of safety. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 35: S1-93.Clark, J. A. (2003) Signaling methods and signaling program design. Galt Associates, Inc. Sterling, VA (UnPub).Faich, G. (2003) Comments on FDA's pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiologic assessment concepts. Available at http://www.fda.gov/cder/meeting/RMtranscript3.doc. Accessed 7-18-2003.Siev, D. (1999) An introduction to analytical methods for the postmarketingsurveillance of veterinary vaccines. Adv. Vet. Med. 41: 749-774. Watson, W. A., Litovitz, T. L., Rodgers, G. C., Jr., Klein-Schwartz, W., Youniss, J., Rose, S. R., Borys, D. & May, M. E. (2003) 2002 annual report of the American association of poison control centers toxic exposure surveillance system. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 21: 353-421.
LSRO, Inc.LSRO, Inc.
www.LSRO.org www.LSRO.org