recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

21
On The Use of Polarimetric On The Use of Polarimetric Orientation for POLSAR Orientation for POLSAR Classification and Decomposition Classification and Decomposition Hiroshi Kimura Gifu University, Japan IGARSS 2011 Vancouver, Canada July 25, 2011

Transcript of recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

Page 1: recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

On The Use of Polarimetric On The Use of Polarimetric Orientation for POLSAR Classification Orientation for POLSAR Classification

and Decompositionand Decomposition

Hiroshi KimuraGifu University, Japan

IGARSS 2011Vancouver, Canada

July 25, 2011

Page 2: recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

ContentsContents

Background

Polarization Orientation in Built-up Areas

Method to Discriminate Built-up and Non-built-up Areas

ALOS PALSAR Experiment

Conclusion

I IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada

Page 3: recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

BackgroundBackground

I IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada

Freeman&Durden decomposition of ALOS PALSAR data (Descend.)Double-bounce, Volume, Surface

From map “Isezaki” by The Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (GSI)

Agricultural field

Built-up Area

Objective: To discriminate built-up and non-built-up areas

Page 4: recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

Polarization Orientation in Built-up AreasPolarization Orientation in Built-up Areas

• PO angle shift of terrain slopes:

: azimuth slope angle, : ground range slope angle,: radar look angle.

Radar

x (azimuth)

y(range)

V H

k

z

sincostan

tantan

• PO angle shift of built-up areas: azimuth slope angle: ground range angle: radar look angel:

wall orientation angle from the normal of radar beamH. Kimura, “Radar polarization orientation shifts in built-up areas,” IEEE GRSL, vol. 5, no. 2, 2008.

cos

tantan

-30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30-40

-20

0

20

40

Wall Orientation Angle: [ ]

SAR

Ori

enta

tion

Ang

le:

[]

=45 =35

From L-band Pi-SAR data of Gifu 4Arg *LLRROO

I IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada

Page 5: recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

Method to Discriminate Built-up and Non-built-up Method to Discriminate Built-up and Non-built-up AreaArea

I IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada

• Detection of built-up areas facing away from the radar (||c)

• Method to discriminate Built-up areas: acordc Not built-up but level surface areas: ac and dca, d : PO angles from ascending and descending orbits c : PO angle threshold from wall orientation angle threshold c

costantan cc

IlluminationIllumination

c2 c2

c2 c2

UNDETECTABLE zone of built-up areas

DETECTABLE zone of built-up areas

ASCENDING DESCENDING

Page 6: recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

I IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada

In case of SMALL threshold In case of SMALL threshold c

(OR)

ASCENDING DESCENDING

DETECTABLE zone of built-up areas

• NO undetectable zone of built-up area

• COMMISSION error (Non-built-up areas are assigned to built-up areas) increases.

• OMSSION error (Built-up areas are assigned to non-built-up areas) decreases.

c2 c2

c2c2

UNDETECTABLE

DETECTABLE

Page 7: recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

I IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada

In case of LARGE threshold In case of LARGE threshold c

(OR)

ASCENDING DESCENDING

DETECTABLE zone of built-up areas

UNDETECTABLE zone

c2 c2

c2 c2

• Undetectable zone of built-up area exists.

• COMMISSION error (Non-built-up areas are assigned to built-up areas) decreases.

• OMSSION error (Built-up areas are assigned to non-built-up areas) increases.

UNDETECTABLE

DETECTABLE

Page 8: recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

ALOS PALSAR Experiment: PALSAR ALOS PALSAR Experiment: PALSAR ScenesScenes

I IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada

The Atsugi area: about 50 km south-west from Tokyo

Radar illumination azimuth: 99 (Ascending) 261 (Descending)

Expected c is 9 (No undetectable zone and the max. c), then the PO angle threshold c will be 10.

Page 9: recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

ALOS PALSAR Experiment: ImagesALOS PALSAR Experiment: Images

I IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada

Pauli color code Freeman&Durden decomposition PO angle|HH-VV|, |HV|, |HH+VV| Double-bounce, Volume, Surface

Page 10: recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

Study Area Study Area ( 5.2km by 3.1 km )( 5.2km by 3.1 km )

I IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada

B3

F3

B2

B1

F2

F1

Google Earth image Map by GSI, Japan

B3

F3

B2

B1

F2

F1© Google Earth

Page 11: recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

Freeman&Durden DecompositionFreeman&Durden Decomposition

I IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada

Google Earth image Ascending Descending

B3

F3

B2

B1

F2

F1Double-bounce Volume Surface© Google Earth

Page 12: recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

H-Alpha SegmentationH-Alpha Segmentation

I IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada

H

Google Earth image Ascending Descending

© Google Earth

B3

F3

B2

B1

F2

F1

Page 13: recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

PO Angle ImagesPO Angle Images

I IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada

Google Earth image Ascending Descending

© Google Earth

B3

F3

B2

B1

F2

F1

Page 14: recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

Discrimination ResultsDiscrimination Results

I IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada

c=5(c=5 ) c=10(c=9) c=12(c=11) White: Built-up area, Black: Non-built-up area

B3

F3

B2

B1

F2

F1

Page 15: recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

Discrimination Results (Built-up areas)Discrimination Results (Built-up areas)

I IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada

© Google Earth

© Google Earth

© Google Earth

B1

B2

B3

White: Built-up area Black: Non-built-up area

Google Earth image c=5(c=5 ) c=10(c=9) c=12(c=11)

Omission errors

Page 16: recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

Discrimination Results (Non-built-up Discrimination Results (Non-built-up areas)areas)

I IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada

© Google Earth

© Google Earth

© Google Earth

F1

F2

F3

Commission errors White: Built-up area Black: Non-built-up area

Google Earth image c=5(c=5 ) c=10(c=9) c=12(c=11)

Page 17: recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

Discrimination ResultsDiscrimination Results

I IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada

Freeman&Durden decomposition of ALOS PALSAR data (Descend.)Double-bounce, Volume, Surface

Built-up Areas (white) and non-built-up areas (black) by c=10(c=9).

Agricultural field

Built-up Area

Page 18: recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

Discrimination ResultsDiscrimination Results

I IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada

Freeman&Durden decomposition of ALOS PALSAR data (Ascend.)Double-bounce, Volume, Surface

Built-up Areas (white) and non-built-up areas (black) by c=10(c=9).

Agricultural field

Built-up Area

Page 19: recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

ConclusionConclusion

I IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada

PO from ascending and descending orbits can be used to discriminate built-up and non-built-up areas.

Radar illumination direction influences POLSAR data aanlysis.

The discrimination prevents misleading of POLSAR decomposition and classification. (Volume scattering in urban areas, double bounce in agricultural fields, et al.)

The expected threshold with no undetectable zone of built-up areas and the maximum number seems to be good, but a further study is required for the best one .

Slopes should be separated.

Page 20: recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

Rotation of Coherence Matrix Rotation of Coherence Matrix (Yamaguchi)(Yamaguchi)

I IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada

BEFORERotation

AFTERRotation

Agricultural fields

Built-up Areas

|HH-VV||HV||HH+VV|

Ascending      Descending

|HH-VV||HV||HH+VV|

Ascending      Descending

Page 21: recent advances in scvattering model-based decompositions

I IGARSS 2011, Vancouver, Canada

Range Slope Angle (degrees)

PO Angle Shifts of Slopes PO Angle Shifts of Slopes