Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement...

9
Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of of Law Enforcement (CACOLE) Law Enforcement (CACOLE) Deputy Chief Norm Lipinski Deputy Chief Norm Lipinski Professionalism in Policing

description

Professionalism in Policing. Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (CACOLE) Deputy Chief Norm Lipinski. The Use of Force by the Police as seen through the lens of…. FORCE CONTINUUM - BEGINNINGS. Part I The Test. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement...

Page 1: Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (CACOLE) Deputy Chief Norm Lipinski

Reasonable Officer Response(R.O.R.)

Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight ofCanadian Association for Civilian Oversight ofLaw Enforcement (CACOLE)Law Enforcement (CACOLE)Deputy Chief Norm LipinskiDeputy Chief Norm Lipinski

Professionalism in Policing

Page 2: Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (CACOLE) Deputy Chief Norm Lipinski

The Use of Force by the Police as seen through the

lens of…

Page 3: Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (CACOLE) Deputy Chief Norm Lipinski

FORCE CONTINUUM - FORCE CONTINUUM - BEGINNINGSBEGINNINGS

Page 4: Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (CACOLE) Deputy Chief Norm Lipinski

Part IPart IThe TestThe Test

Given the totality of the circumstances, the Given the totality of the circumstances, the following factors will be considered by the court:following factors will be considered by the court:

a)a) Was the officer lawfully placed?Was the officer lawfully placed?b)b) Did the officer subjectively believe that the Did the officer subjectively believe that the

amount of force used was reasonable?amount of force used was reasonable?c)c) Would an objective reasonable person (standing Would an objective reasonable person (standing

in the officers’ shoes) believe that the level of in the officers’ shoes) believe that the level of force used was reasonable?force used was reasonable?

Page 5: Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (CACOLE) Deputy Chief Norm Lipinski

Part IPart IEnvironmental Factors:Environmental Factors:

Location (confined space, Location (confined space, isolation)isolation)CoverCoverWeatherWeatherLightingLightingFootingFootingOther exigent circumstancesOther exigent circumstances

Page 6: Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (CACOLE) Deputy Chief Norm Lipinski

Part IPart ISubject Factors:Subject Factors:

Age, size, gender Age, size, gender Number of subjectsNumber of subjectsTraining, experience, fitnessTraining, experience, fitnessExhaustion, injuriesExhaustion, injuriesGoal orientedGoal orientedNature and severity of crimeNature and severity of crimeHistoryHistoryMental stateMental stateAlcohol, drugsAlcohol, drugsVerbal, non-verbal threat cuesVerbal, non-verbal threat cuesWeapons, proximity to weaponsWeapons, proximity to weaponsFleeing, risk of escapeFleeing, risk of escapeImmediate / imminent threat to police/public/themselvesImmediate / imminent threat to police/public/themselvesAudience/peersAudience/peers

Page 7: Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (CACOLE) Deputy Chief Norm Lipinski

Part IPart IOfficer Factors:Officer Factors:

Age, size, genderAge, size, genderNumber of officers Number of officers Training, experience, fitnessTraining, experience, fitnessExhaustion, injuriesExhaustion, injuriesPrior knowledge of the subjectPrior knowledge of the subjectDistance from subjectDistance from subjectPosition Position EquipmentEquipment

Page 8: Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (CACOLE) Deputy Chief Norm Lipinski

2008-05-30

Reasonable Officer ResponseReasonable Officer ResponseTraining AidTraining Aid

Part II

OFFICER PERCEPTION Cooperative Low Level Resister High Level Resister Assaultive G.B.H./Death

The Standard - Objective Reasonableness

Lawful & Professional PresenceTactical Communication Skills

Intermediate Weapons (O.C. spray, C.E.D., baton)

Tactical Considerations

(pressure points, joint locks)Empty Hand - Soft

Empty Hand - Hard (distraction techniques, takedowns, punches, kicks)

OFF

ICER

RES

PON

SE

Lethal Options

Page 9: Reasonable Officer Response (R.O.R.) Canadian Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (CACOLE) Deputy Chief Norm Lipinski

Reasonable Officer Response(R.O.R.)

Questions and CommentsQuestions and Comments

Professionalism in Policing