Reapportionment of Assembly Districts
Transcript of Reapportionment of Assembly Districts
![Page 1: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Reapportionmentof Assembly Districts
October 27, 2021(review of Assembly Counsel presentations given
March 8, 2019, and June 25, 2021)
![Page 2: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Apportionment from 1975 …
October 26, 2021 Resource Data Inc 2
![Page 3: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
… to 2012 current Assembly Districts
October 26, 2021 Resource Data Inc 3
![Page 4: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Reapportionment of the Municipality
Charter § 4.01. - Power, composition and apportionment.• The legislative power of Anchorage is vested in an assembly of 11 members. Election
districts, if established, shall be formed of compact and contiguous territory containing as nearly as practicable a relatively integrated socioeconomic area. The assembly shall be reapportioned whenever it becomes malapportioned. The assembly shall determine and declare by resolution whether or not it is malapportioned within two months from:
• (1)• Adoption of a final state redistricting plan under art. VI, sec. 10, Constitution of the State
of Alaska;• If the assembly determines that it is malapportioned, it shall, within six months of the
determination, reapportion itself in the manner provided by law.• (AO No. 2006-154, prop. 10, 4-17-07)
October 26, 2021 Resource Data Inc 4
Applicable law: Charter § 4.01
![Page 5: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Reapportionment of the Municipality
October 26, 2021 Resource Data Inc 5
Applicable law: Alaska Constitution, Art. VI § 3 & 10
Art. VI, § 3
Art. VI, § 10
![Page 6: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
October 26, 2021 Resource Data Inc 6
Reapportionment Process - 2012
“A Decidedly Political Process”
![Page 7: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
October 26, 2021 Resource Data Inc 7
Reapportionment Process - 2012
![Page 8: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
What is “Malapportioned”?• Equal Protection Clause
requires: substantial equality of population among the election districts
• One person, one vote• Fair and Effective representation
• New population data within current districts is compiled
• Is the total deviation from Target population > 10%?
• Yes = presumptively malapportioned
October 26, 2021 Resource Data Inc 8
1. Total population
2. Divide by 11 ( # of elected representatives)
3. = Target population per representative
1. Population within each District
2. Compared to Target
3. = % deviation
![Page 9: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Past malapportionment findingsAR 2012-181 AR 2001-119
October 26, 2021 Resource Data Inc 9
Total Deviation per table = 20%
![Page 10: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Past malapportionment findings: two anomaliesAR 1991-242 - Rejected by Assembly - Advise of Municipal
Attorney acknowledged 10% is presumptive, but courts have upheld up to 16.94% deviation for good reason
- AO 1991-182 redrew lines minimally – moved 1 precinct
AO 1988-76 – out of 6 proposalsAdding military base population of 16,386
October 26, 2021 Resource Data Inc 10
![Page 11: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Now to draw the lines - Rules• Charter § 4.01:
• Compact• Contiguous territory• Relatively integrated
socioeconomic area• Federal law: over 10%
deviation is presumptively unconstitutional
• A single district with over 5% deviation gets a “hard look”
October 26, 2021 Resource Data Inc 11
1. Craft lines in compliance with 1. Charter § 4.01 2. Equal Protection
2. Test the proposal against VRA1. Adjust only minimally to
conform to VRA2. Benchmark – 2012 Districts,
with current % minority and % Native
3. Proposed boundaries:
![Page 12: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Rules• Maximum population
deviation (sum of absolute values of the two districts with the greatest over-representation and under-representation)
• EP: substantial equality of population
• Charter requirements
October 26, 2021 Resource Data Inc 12
Most over represented 0.98%
Most under represented -1.47%
Total population deviation
2.45%
![Page 13: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Voting Rights Act• Minority effective district =
>35% of Voting Age Persons (VAP) belong to a single minority group “highly likely to be able to elect candidate o choice
• 2012: District 1 was 56.9% minority, a variety
• 19.8% Native
• No regression in minority voting power
• Electoral behavior• Electoral participation• Election history• Voting patterns• Registration and turnout
• Decrease in 1 district ok, IF corresponding increase of minority in other district
October 26, 2021 Resource Data Inc 13
![Page 14: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
VRA analysis – 2012
Benchmark 2002 Districts
Proposed 2012 Districts – MT 1.1
October 26, 2021 Resource Data Inc 14
Proposed 2012 Districts – DT 3.1
![Page 15: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Anchorage socioeconomic integrationIn re 2001 Redistricting Cases, 44 P.3d 141 (Alaska 2002)
October 26, 2021 Resource Data Inc 15
![Page 16: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Population basis alternatives
1. Total population, all persons2. Voting age population3. Registered voters
population4. Voted – cast ballot
Evenwel v. Abbott, 136 S.Ct. 1120 (2016)
October 26, 2021 Resource Data Inc 16
Which “Population” data?
![Page 17: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Population basis alternatives
October 26, 2021 Resource Data Inc 17
Which “Population” data? Substantial equality of population?
District # registered voters # votes cast Total Population2010
1 26,533
2 52,281
3 52,891
4 53,370
5 53,578
6 53,173
Total 291,791
![Page 18: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Potential issues from redrawing boundaries
Truncation of terms
• Kentopp court addressed an argument for truncation:
• Appropriate tool to apply in conjunction with reapportionments
• Discretionary authority for Assembly
• Intrusive remedy for a court to order
• Court not compelled to order truncation under this test:
October 26, 2021 Resource Data Inc 18
When? Permanent change in lines that 1. excludes substantial numbers
of constituents previously represented; OR
2. Includes numerous other voters.
But3. Temporary shift of constituents in reapportionment no greater than normal – not a compelling reason
![Page 19: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Potential effects of redrawing boundaries
October 26, 2021 Resource Data Inc 19
Charter § 4.02(c) requires: “An assembly member shall remain a resident of Anchorage and of the district from which elected while in office.”And (d):“The assembly shall be the judge of the election and qualification of its members.”
Qualifications of members
![Page 20: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Proposition 12 – April 7, 2020 election
October 26, 2021 Resource Data Inc 20
![Page 21: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Following the State’s timelineNovember 10, 2021: Deadline for Final State Plan to be Adopted
• February 28, 2022: Deadline for MOA Resolution on malapportionment
• August 29, 2022: Deadline for adoption of new Assembly Boundaries
• April 4, 2023: first regular election with 12 Assembly Members?
October 26, 2021 Resource Data Inc 21
![Page 22: Reapportionment of Assembly Districts](https://reader031.fdocuments.in/reader031/viewer/2022030217/621e7bc9bcd47b602641264b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Thank you!
October 26, 2021 Resource Data Inc. 22