Ratfish Info
Transcript of Ratfish Info
LENGTH-WEIGHT RELATIONSHIP, FOOD HABITS, PARASITES,
AND SEX AND AGE DETERMINATION OF THE RATFISH,
HYDROLAGUS COLLIEI (LAY AND BENNETT)'
ALLYN G. JOHNSON' AND HOWARD F. HORTON'
ABSTRAcr
In the fall and winter of 1965-1967, 292 ratfish (Hydrolagus colliei) Wi!re collected fromfour locations off the Pacific coast of Oregon. Specimens were examined for length-weightrelationships, food habits, parasites, and a method of sex and age determination. Equations describing the body weight-body length (snout to vent) relationships were log weight= log -4.3217 + 3.0546 log length for males, and log weight = log -4.1692 + 2.9720log length for females. The food organisms most important to ratfish were shrimp(Pandalus and Crago), mollusks (Musculus and Amphissa), and echinoderms (Brisaster). Two occurrences of cannibalism were found in ratfish collected off Cape Arago,Oreg. Infestations by Gyrocotyle ranged from 29 to 66% among samples from the fourlocations. The copepod, Acanthochondria sp., was attached to the claspers of sevenmales from Cape Arago. EYi!-lens weights (wet and dry), vertebral radii, basal sectionsof the dorsal spine and left pectoral fin, and body-length frequencies were studied, butno accurate method of age determination was found. Tritors on the posterior side ofthe vomerine dental plate may be indicative of age, but the precise relationship was notdetermined.
'I'he ratfish, Hydrolagus colliei (Lay and Bennett), is a member of the class Chondrichthyes,order Chamaeriformes, and family Chimaeridae(Bailey, 1970). Distributed from western Alaska to northern Baja California (Koratha, 1960),this cartilaginous fish is the only chimaeroidfound on the Pacific coast of Canada and theUnited States. Ratfish are of little economicvalue, but their liver oil is an excellent lubricantand could be used commercially (Clemens andWilby, 1961). Ratfish are an important sourceof food for such commercial fishes as soupfinsharks, Galeorhinus zyopterus (Nakatsu, 1957),Spiny dogfish, Squalus acanthias (Alverson andStansby, 1963), and Pacific halibut, Hippoglos-
----'.Technical Paper No. 3144, Oregon Agricultural Ex-perIment Station, Corvallis, Oreg.lJ ,Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon Statet,lllversity, Corvallis, pR 9733;1; present addres.s: ~adonal Marine Fisheries SerVIce, Northwest FIsherIes9anter, 2725 :M;ontlake Boulevard East, Seattle, WA
102.lJ '. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State
niversity, Corvallis, OR 97331.
M;;;-:-FISB,cnpt accepted January 1972.
ERY BULLETIN: VOL. 70, NO.2, 1972.
sus stenolepis (Thompson, 1915) . Conversely,ratfish are commonly caught in the trawls ofcommercial fishermen who consider them a nuisance. Our study was conducted to help fill theneed for more information on the general biologyof this primitive fish (Bigelow and Schroeder,1953; Crescitelli, 1969).
Little information has been published on thefood habits of H. colliei. . Dean (1906) reportedthat Chimaera (Hydrolagus) colliei fed on smallisospondylous fishes, opisthobranchs, annelids,crustaceans, mollusks, squids, and nudibranchs.Olsson (1896) and Legendre (1944) reportedthat Chimaera monstrosa fed on mollusks, decopods, annelids, amphipods, echinoderms, andcoelenterates.
Several studies have been conducted on theparasites of H. colliei. Wardle (1932) reportedthat most ratfish contained a pair of Gyrocotyleurna in the anterior region (spiral valve) of theintestine. Lynch (1945) concluded that G. urnashould be divided into G. U1'/Ul, and G. fimbriata.Koratha (1960) examined two H. colliei from
421
Baja California and found two digenea (Otodistomum sp.) and one cestode from the intestine,one hirudinean (Branchellion sp.) from the skinsurface, and three copepods (Chondracanthusepacthes) and one monogenea from the gills.A monogenea reported from the gills of ratfishfrom Washington waters was Octobathriumleptogaster (Bonham, 1950). Wilson (1935)reported the copepods Acanthochondria clavataand A. epachthes from the claspers and gills, respectively, of H. colliei from California waters.Kabata (1968) could not accept Wilson's (1935)identification of A. clavata, because the specieshad never been found outside the North Sea,and described A. holocephalarum from the claspers of ratfish captured off British Columbia.
Most morphometric studies of ratfish havebeen descriptive or histological in nature. Sanford, Clegg, and Bonham (1945) studied the liver oil and vitamin A content of 35 ratfish captured off Tatoosh Island, Wash. These factorswere related later to size and sex of ratfish byPidlaoan (1950). Halstead and Bunker (1952)described the venom apparatus and anatomy ofthe dorsal spine of ratfish. They concluded thatthe venom of H. colliei was not capable of inflicting fatal injuries to man. A histologicalstudy of the digestive tract and of the pituitaryof H. colliei was conducted by Clothier (1957)and Sathyanesan (1965), respectively.
Stanley (1961) performed a morphometricstudy of the genital systems of H. colliei andfound that summer was the peak reproductiveperiod although one-third of the females and allof the males evidenced reproductive activitythroughout the year. Sexual maturity was attained at 24-25 cm (S-V)' for females and 18.5- .20 cm (S-V) for males.
METHODS
Four collections totaling 292 ratfish were madeby otter trawl off the coast of Oregon at depthsranging from 50 to 120 fm from 1965 to 1967.The collection from off Newport (N = 189) was
• Body length measured from the tip of the snout tothe anterior edge of the vent.
422
FISHERY BULLETIN: VOL. 70, NO.2
frozen while specimens collected off Cape BlancO(N = 44), Cape Arago (N = 35), and Astoria(N = 24) were preserved in 10% Formalin.
All ratfish were examined as follows: SeX:was determined by inspection of the gonads;snout to vent length was measured in millimeters, and total weight was measured in grams;all specimens were examined for internal and eX:ternal parasites; alimentary canals were examined along their entire length for food itemS;and dental plates, dorsal spines, left pectoral fins,and a piece of the vertebral column were decalcified, sectioned frozen, treated with Delafield'shemat0xylin stain, and examined for growthstructures indicative of age. Both eye lenseswere removed from specimens in the Newportand Astoria collections. The wet and dry weightof each lens was determined to the nearest tenthousandth of a gram. For wet-weight determinations, lenses were stored in 10% Formalinfor 1 month, removed and blotted, and immediately weighed. For dry weight determinations,the lenses were then desiccated at 80 a C for 82 hrand reweighed. The 82-hr drying period waSdetermined from a curve of weights of 10 lenseSdried at 80 a C and weighed at progressive timeintervals. The 82-hr period assured evaporation to a stable weight.
Most statistical analyses of body length-bodYweight and body length-eye-lens weight relationships were performed on a CDC 3300 computer'utilizing program FISH 6669 in the Departmentat Oregon State University.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
There was a highly significant correlation(P = 0.01) of body length to body weight formale and female ratfish in the large Newportcollection and for the aggregate of each sex collected (Table 1). Based on the coefficient ofdetermination (r2 ) (Croxton, 1953), more than87% of the variation in weight in males andmore than 96% in females was attributable tothe variation in length of the ratfish. The length-
• Reference to trade names in this publication doeSnot imply endorsement of commercial products by theNational Marine Fisheries Service.
JOIiNSON and HORTON: RATFISH, ASPECTS OF BIOLOGY
;"fP" .!:eo~& I)! ,1*.
0.9352 0.234 0.8746.9824 .361 .9651.9917 .210 .9835.9943 .257 .9886
'l'ABLE I.-Data to describe length-weight relationship (log weight = log a + b log length) for male and femaleratfish collected off Oregon during 1965-67.
---------------=--;-----=:-:------=~-------------------lotatlon Sex Sample Constant Constant____ size 101) a b
NewPo::::rt:-----Mo:-;-;-le------:l:::28:------:-2.0::1-;:68~----:2:-:.0:-:-44=7-----:-::-:-----.:....-----:..-------
NeWPort Female 56 -3.1384 2.5336Totalt Mole 175 -4.3217 3.0546Totol t__ Female 112 -9.1692 2.9720
.: From Table X in Quenouille (1952).
t Coefficient of determination (Croxton, 1953).Composite of collections from Newport, Astoria, Cape Arago, and Cape Blanco.
3.2
FIGURE l.-Length-weight relationship of male and female ratfish collected oft' Newport, Oreg., 1965.
dition, we found Gyrocotyle in the mouths ofsome trawl-caught ratfish, indicating that thecontents of the alimentary canals recently hadbeen voided. According to Lynch (1945),Gyrocotyle would normally be restrictedto the anterior section of the intestine (spiralvalve) .
The parasites found on or in the ratfish wereGyrocotyle urna, G. jimbriata, and the copepod,Acanthochondria sp. Table 3 lists the frequencyof Gyrocotyle occurring in the four collectionsof ratfish. Both G. jimbriata and G. urna appeared in about equal numbers in the Newportcollection, but only G. jimbriata occurred in theAstoria and Cape Arago collections. The frequency of infestation by Gyrocotyle in youngfish from the Cape Blanco collection was 30%.We did not find evidence of mass infestation byGyrocotyle, as suggested by Wardle (1932). Theyoung fish «50 mm) contained from zero totwo Gyrocotyle each. The voiding of canal contents by the ratfish interfered with obtaining anaccurate estimation of the degree of infestation.
2.52.2 2.3 2.4LOG BODY LENGTH (S-V) (mm)
/I. MALESLOG WEIGHT - -2.0169" 2.0447 LOG LENGTHt -,9352, ,2-,8746
~~'128
/:"FEMALESLOG WEIGHT--3.1!84+2.5336 LOG LENGTHr - ,9824, r2 -.9651
a
~ 3.0'"
2.1
I-~ 2.B
w
~ 2.6>oolD 2.4(J)
o...J 2.2
Weight relationship for male and female ratfish~ollected off Newport is defined and illustratedIn Figure 1.11 A. taxonomic list of all food organisms identi. ed from the alimentary canals of 283 ratfish~~ Pr'esented in Table 2. The table also contains~sts of the relative importance of food items
yo the frequency of occurrence and numericaltnethods (Lagler, 1956) and gives the locations
fOf the collections in which the food items wereoUnd.
Based on these data, ratfish appear to be opportunistic feeders. The most important food~ms (>10% occurrence) were shrimp (Pan-
lus and Crago) I mollusks (Musculus and Am'Phissa) , and echinoderms (Brisaster). In gential, young and adult rattish a~e the sa~e foods.
ean (1906) found seaweed III the alImentarycanals of rattish, but we did not find any planttnaterials in the specimens we examined.
In the Cape Arago collection, ratfish were~aten by ratfish. One egg capsule and a caudaln Were eaten by two large females (280 mm).~e are not aware of any previous record of cannIbalism in ratfish. Of the teleostomi, flatfish~ppeared to be taken most frequently by ratfish.~ two flatfish found were Hippoglossoides
e sodon and Esopsetta jordani.In the food habits study, we did not use a
Volurnetric method of examination because intnany alimentary canals only shells and fragments remained. Also, materials such as carapaces of shrimp have a large surface to volumerelationship which causes them to displace littleWater or to float. Ratfish often void ingestedmatter between capture and landing, makingVolumetric measurements inaccurate. DeanAl~06) commented on this habit, and we noticed
In rattish captured by hook and line. In ad-
423
FISHERY BULLETIN: VOL. 70, NO.2
TABLE 2.-Taxonomic list1 and relative importance of food organisms identified from thealimentary canals of 283 ratfish (HydrolagUB colliei)' collected off Oregon during1965"1967.
Frequency of Numerical method' location'Organi.ms occurrence (%) Organisms %. A N CA CB
Phylum AnnelidaClass Polychaeta
Aphrodito 4.4 10 1.0 x x xUnidentified 2.2 10 1.0 x x
Phylum Mollu.coCia.. Gastrapoda
Amphisso 33.4 1,016 74.5 x x x xAmygdalum 2.2 9 1.0 xYoldia 2.6 6 0.0+ xMustulul 24.6 66 4.9 x X x X
L'Ptopect,n 0.9 2 OM- xPecttn l.B 7 0.0+ X
Cardiomya 6.1 27 2.0 xCallioltomo 0.4 1 0.0+ xStarlesia 0.4 I 0.0+ x
Ciasa ScaphapodaDI1Jtalium 3.1 7 0.0+ X X
Phylum ArthropodaClass Cru.tacea
Lit/oMta 4.B 26 2.0 X X X
Cra,o ,12.3 32 2.3 X
Pandalul 20.2 81 5.9 X x XCa",,, 0.9 2 0.0+ x xChione"ttl 0.4 1 0.0+ xUnidentified 3.5 13 1.0 X
Phylum EchinodermataCia.. Echlnaldea
BnsDster 11.0 25 I.B x x X
Strongyloctntrotul 0.9 2 0.0+ X X
Phylum ChordataClass Chondrlchthes
Hydrola,ul 0.9 2 0.0+ XClass Osteichthyes
Pleuroneelldae 0.7 :2 0.0+ x XUnidentified 5.5 13 1.0 x x x
Unknown 0.4 1 0.0+ X
Total 1,362 98.4+
'1 After Smith et al. (1954), Barnes (1963), and Bailey (1970)•• Of the 283 ralflsh, 224 contained food organisms.• Fragments (less than one-half an animal) were recorded as one individual., Location. were. A = Astoria, N = Newport, CA = Cape Arago, and CB = Cape Blanco.
Gyrocotyle were found lodged in the folds of thespiral valve and were not embedded in the intestinal wall, thus making expulsion by violentintestinal movements possible.
In the Cape Arago collection, 7 of the 21 adultmale ratfish had from two to eight Acanthochondria sp. attached to the free ends of their claspers. The immature males and the females didnot carry this copepod. The species is similar
, to, but not the same as, A. compacta.·
• Personal communication, Dr. Satyu Yamaguti, BeltsviIle, Md., June 13, 1967.
424
An unidentified fungus, which occurred on theintestine of 29% of the Newport collection, wasnot necessarily a parasite as it may have developed in the interval between capture and preservation. No visible lesions or other damage werenoticed on the body or alimentary canal surfacesof the ratfish in which the fungus occurred. Thefungus appeared to be of nonseptate, white, filamentous type.
Sex and relative age of ratfish can be determined by examination of the secondary sex characteristics. Males possess a frontal .tenaculum,prepelvic tenacula, and claspers, whereas fe-
JOHNSON and HORTON: RATFISH. ASPECTS OF BIOLOGY
TABLE 3.-Gy7·ocotyle found in 283 ratfish (Hydrolagus oolliei) collected off the coastof Oregon, 1965-1967.
Total number of Gyrocoty/(l NumberLocation of Percent
G. fimbriata G. urna Unidentified rotfish infested'examined
Newport 50(34) 62(39) 38(25) 184 53.2(60.0)Astoria 8( 7) 24 29.2(31.8)Cape Arago 40(23) 35 65.8(79.4)Cape Blanca 18(11) 4( 2) 40 30.0(35.4)
1. Number In parenthesis is the number of raffish infested.~ !Number in parenthesis Is the percent infestation when alimentary canals that contained neither food nor para
sites were excluded ..
lb.ales do not possess these structures but deVelop paired oviducal openings not possessed bylb.ales. Development of these structures can beUsed to separate ratfish into young, immature,;nd adult age groups. Young males have a(~?tal tenaculum streak and diminutive claspers
19ure 2); immature males have a small frontal tenaculum and claspers which are not perfo-
rated at their free ends (Figure 3); and maturemales have a well-developed frontal tenaculumand well-developed claspers which are perforatedat their free ends (Figure 4). Young femaleshave no oviducal openings (Figure 2); the oviducts of immature females have small openings(Figure 3); and mature females have oviductalopenings which are large, elongated, and swollen
A c
FIGURE 2.-Regions of young ratfish showing (A) the frontal tenaculum streak, and(B) the small claspers of the male; and (C) the absence of a frontal tenaculum streak,and (D) the absence of oviductal openings in the female.
425
FISHERY BULLETIN: VOL. 70, NO.2
A
....
o
E
FIGURE 3.-Regions of immature ratfish showing (A) the frontal tenaculum, (B) theprepelvic tenacula, and (C) the claspers of the male; and (D) the absence of a frontaltenaculum, and (E) the presence of small openings to the oviducts of the female.
(Figure 4). Attempts to age ratfish on the basisof length-frequency distributions were inconclusive.
When dry eye-lens weight was compared tobody length for specimens in the Newport collection, lens weight was positively correlatedwith increasing body length for males (N =128), but was not correlated with body lengthfor females (N = 56) (Figure 5). There wasno difference in the dry weights of the right andleft eye lens at the 95 % level of confidence. Weteye-lens weights were similarly related to bodylengths with the coefficient of determination (r2
)
for males being 0.8788 and 0.9292 for the rightand left eye lens respectively, and for females
426
being 0.0017 and 0.0133 for the right and lefteye lens respectively.
We can offer no logical explanation for thelack of positive correlation between eye-lenSweight and body length for female ratfish. Datafor males and 'females were processed simultaneously and were consistent, by sex, for left andright and for wet and dry eye-lens weights.Because all but eight females exceeded 230 mwin length, most eye-lens growth may take placebetween birth (30-40 mm [Stanley, 1961])and maturity (240-250 mm [Stanley, 1961J)·The possibility of decreasing density of thelens with size (and maturity) should be investigated.
JOHNSON .nd HORTON: RATFISH, ASPECTS OF BIOLOGY
oA
FIGURE 4.-Regions of mature ratfish showing (A) the frontal tenaculum, (B) the prepelvic tenacula, and (C) the claspers of the male; and (D) the absence of a frontal tenaculwl1, and (E)the presence of well-developed openings to the oviducts of the female.
In general, there was an increase in the sizeof other body parts (teeth, vertebrae, base of leftPectoral fin, and base of dorsal spine) with increasing body length. We did not find any layering or structures in these body parts whichwere sufficiently correlated with body length toPl'ovide a possible means of age determination.
The number of tritors (horizontal ridges) onthe Posterior side of the left vomerine dentalPlate was compared to the respective body lengthof male and female ratfish in the Cape Blancoand Newport collections. In general, the num~el' of tritors increased with increasing bodyte~gth (Figure 6). Two problems arose in usinghIS structure as a basis for age determination:(l) No comparison to known-aged fish was pos-
sible. (2) The amount of wear on these ridgesper unit of time was not known.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Drs. C. E. Bond, R. E. Millemann, R. C. Simon,and J. D. Hall, Department of Fisheries andWildlife, Oregon State University, providedcounsel and reviewed the manuscript. Dr. W. S.Overton, Department of Statistics, Oregon StateUniversity, provided direction in the statisticalanalyses. Special thanks are due personnel ofthe Fish Commission of Oregon for assistancein obtaining ratfish for this study. James Meehan and Gary Milburn were particularly helpful.
427
FISHERY BULLETIN: VOL. 70, NO.2
FIGURE 5.-Log dry eye-lens weight compared to logbody length for ratfish collected off Newport, Oreg., 1965.
.."z
.."z
o oI.---5.1.::o----,I-!o.".o--:-:,5~O:----:::2~O"'::'O---:2~5:-::0:----::;3Z00
BODY LENGTH (S-V) (mm)
FIGURE G.-Comparison of the number of tritors on theposterior side of the vomerine dental plate to body lengthof ratfish collected off Oregon, 1965-1967.
10MALES
en S?a:: 5 z0t:: Ifa::~
lJ.. 00 FEMALESa:: 10w(l)
0::E:::l zz 5 •
.-RIGHT LENS OF FEMALES. r2 =.0001D-RIGHT LENS OFMALES. r 2 =.8944°-LEFT LENS OF FEMALES. ,2 =.02426-LEFT LENS OF MALES. r2 =.9169
6
c; .000lI<.?W3:(f)
z 0====":1-=====~ -.333 •I
W>W
>0::o<.?o...J -.6 67~----!::!'-----1_------'--
2.00 2.25 2.50LOG BODY LENGTH (S-Vl (mm)
LITERATURE CITED
ALVERSON, D. L., AND M. E. STANSBY.1963. The spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) in
the northeastern Pacific. U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv.,Spec. Sci. Rep. Fish. 447, 25 p.
BAILEY, R. M. (chairman).1970. A list of common and scientific names of fish
es from the United States and Canada. Am. Fish.Soc., Spec. Publ. G, 149 p.
BARNES, R. D.1963. Invertebrate zoology. W. B. Saunders,
Phila., 632 p.BIGELOW, H. n., AND W. C. SCHROEDER.
1953. Fishes of the western North Atlantic. PartTwo. Sawfishes, guitarfishes, skates and rays[and] chimaeroids. Mem. Sears Found. Mar.Res., Yale Univ. 1, 588 p.
BONHAM, K.1950. Some monogenetic trematodes of Puget
Sound fishes. In M. H. Hatch (editor), Studieshonoring Trevor Kincaid, p. 85-103. Univ. Wash.Press, Seattle.
CLEMENS, W. A., AND G. V. WILBY.1961. Fishes of the Pacific coast of Canada. 2d ed.
Fish. Res. Board Can., Bull. 68, 443 p.CLOTHIER, G. E.
1957. The histology of the digestive tract of thechimaeroid fish Hydrolagu8 colliei (Lay and Ben.nett). M.S. Thesis, Oregon State CoH., Corvallis,48 p.
CRESClTELLI, F.1969. The visual pigment of a chimaeroid fish.
Vision Res. 9 :1407-1414.CROXTON, F. E.
1953. Elementary statistics with applications inmedicine and the biological sciences. Dover Publ.,N.Y., 376 p.
DEAN, B.1906. Chimaeroid fishes and their development.
Carnegie rnst. Wash. Publ. 32, 194 p.HALSTEAD, B. W., AND N. C. BUNKER.
1952. The venom apparatus of the ratfish, Hydro[aqu8 colliei. Copeia 1952 :128-138.
KABATA, Z.1968. Some Chondracanthidae (Copepoda) from
fishes of British Columbia. J. Fish. Res. BoardCan. 25 :321-345.
KORATHA, K. J.1960. Preliminary report on the parasites of a
chimaeroid fish, Hydrolagus colliei (Lay and Bennett) from the eastern Indo-Pacific with commentson the phylogenetic significance of parasitic distribution in Holocephali. (Abstr.) J. Parasitol.46(5) Sect. 2:14.
LAGLER, K. F.1956. Freshwater fishery biology. 2d ed. Wm. C.
Brown, Dubuque, 421 p.LEGENDRE, R.
1944. Notes biologiques sur Chimaera monstrosa L.Bull. Soc. Zoo!' Fr. 69(1) :10-17.
LYNCH, J. E.1945. Redescription of the species Gyrocotyle from
428
]OI-II-1S0N and HORTON: RATFISH, ASPECTS OF BIOLOGY
LYNCIi-Cont.the rattish Hyd1'olagus colliei (Lay and Bennett),with notes on the morphology and taxonomy of
N the genus. J. Parasitol. 31 :418-446.Al(ATSU, L. M.
1957. A review of the soupfin shark fishery of theo Pacific coast. Commer. Fish. Rev. 19 (12) :5-8.
LaaoN, P.1896. Sur Chimaera monstrosa et ses parasites.
p Mem. Soc. Zoo!. Fr. 9 :499-512.IJ:)LAoAN, N. A.
1950. The vitamin A potency of liver oil and theoil yield in the ratfish (H. colliei) of Puget Sound,and the relationship of these factors to size andsex of the fish. M.S. Thesis, Univ. Washington,
Q Seattle, 45 p.UJ;:NOUILLE, M. H.
1952. Associated measurements. Butterworths Sci.S Publ., Lond., 242 p.
ANl'Onn, F. B., W. CLEGG, AND K. BONHAM.S 1945. The ratfish. Fish. Mark. News 7(11) :6-7.
A'I'IiYANESAN, A. G.1965. The hypophysis and hypothalamo-hypophys
ial system in the chimaeroid fish Hydrolagus
colliei (Lay and Bennett) with a note on theirvascularization. J. Morphol. 116:413-449.
SMITH, R. 1., F. A. PITELKA, D. A. ABBOTT, AND F. M.WEESNER.
1954. Intertidal invertebrates of the central California coast: S. F. Light's "Laboratory and fieldtext in invertebrate zoology." Revised ed. Univ.Calif. Press, Berkeley, 446 p.
STANLEY, H. P.1961. Studies on the genital systems and reproduc
tion in the chimaeroid fish Hydrolagus colliei (Layand Bennett). Ph.D. Thesis, Oregon State Univ.,Corvallis, 94 p.
THOMPSON, W. F.1915. A preliminary report on the life-history of
the halibut. B.C. Rep. Comm. Fish. 1914, p. 7699.
WARDLE, R. A.1932. The cestoda of Canadian fishes. 1. The Pa
cific coast region. Contrib. Can. BioI. Fish., NewSer. 7 :221-243.
WILSON, C. B.1935. Parasitic copepods from the Pacific coast.
Am. MidI. Nat. 16:776-797.
429