Rapid Detection of Trichomonas vaginalis from Vaginal Specimens by Transcription- Mediated...

1
Rapid Detection of Trichomonas vaginalis from Vaginal Specimens by Transcription-Mediated Amplification A. Sitay 1 , J. Bungo 1 , K. Dickey 1 , W. Weisburg 1 , T. Aguirre 2 , D. Fuller 2 , L. Jasper 2 , T. Davis 2 ; 1 Gen-Probe Incorporated, San Diego, CA; 2 Wishard Memorial Hospital, Indianapolis, IN Figure 1. Trichomonas Assay Procedure Background: Trichomonas vaginalis (Tvag) is a common cause of sexually transmitted disease (STD), with an estimated 5 million new cases occurring annually in the U.S. Ten to 50% of infections are asymptomatic. Diagnosis of Tvag infection is problematic. The commonly used wet mount, while rapid, has low sensitivity. Culture and Pap stain are lengthy procedures and technically challenging. A rapid, amplified assay system is described here for detection of Tvag. Methods: The test includes target capture, Transcription-Mediated Amplification (TMA) and a Hybridization Protection Assay (HPA). Target capture uses specific DNA capture oligos and magnetic beads for separation of target rRNA from clinical specimens. TMA amplifies a specific region of the target rRNA. HPA uses a chemiluminescent probe in a homogenous assay format whereby probe binds specifically to Tvag amplicon and is induced to emit light. Results: A total of 152 vaginal swabs from patients attending STD clinics were tested in the Tvag assay system at Gen- Probe Incorporated and compared with wet mount, InPouch culture, BD Affirm, and Pap stain performed at Wishard Memorial Hospital. Thirty-six specimens were positive by any one of the 4 comparator methods; 34 of these were positive by TMA. One hundred sixteen specimens were negative for T. vaginalis by all 4 comparator methods; 95 of these were negative by TMA and 21 were positive by TMA. The apparent sensitivity and specificity of the TMA assay were 94% and 82%, respectively. It is unclear if the TMA+, comparator- specimens are TMA false positive results or reflect the greater sensitivity of target amplification. Fifteen of the 21 TMA+, comparator- specimens were positive on repeat TMA testing, suggesting that they may be true positives. If this is the case, the sensitivity and specificity would be 96% and 94%, respectively. The remaining six may be false positives or contain such low concentrations of T. vaginalis as to be subject to sampling variation. Conclusions: Our results suggest that target amplification may be a more rapid and sensitive method to detect T. vaginalis than alternative methods, including culture.* ABSTRACT MATERIALS AND METHODS Table 3. Test Comparison for Detection of T. vaginalis RESULTS A total of 152 vaginal swab specimens were tested at Wishard and at Gen-Probe to help determine the feasibility of a TMA- based method for the detection of T. vaginalis from vaginal swabs (Table 1). A preliminary cut-off of 30,000 RLU was used to evaluate the TMA test data. Thirty-six specimens (24% prevalence) were positive by any one of the 4 comparator methods; 34 of these were positive by TMA. Two specimens that were positive only by the PAP smear method (only by one of the 3 cytologists in one case and by 2 of the 3 in the other case) were negative by the TMA method. Of the 116 specimens that were negative by all 4 comparator methods, 95 were negative by TMA and 21 were positive by TMA. Fifteen of the 21 TMA+/comparator- specimens were positive on repeat TMA testing, and one was unavailable for a repeat test. This suggests that the 15 may be true positives. The remaining 6 may be false positives or contain such low concentrations of T. vaginalis as to be subject to sampling errors. If the 15 TMA+/comparator- specimens were considered to be true positives, then the TMA test sensitivity would be 96% and the specificity 94%. A summary of the total positive tests for each method for the 152 swab specimens is shown in Table 2. A summary of a selected set of test comparisons is shown in Table 3. Assuming that the total number of true positive results is 51 (49 repeat + TMA tests, and 2 + by PAP only), then the actual prevalence of T. vaginalis infection in this population was 34%, and the sensitivity of each test method was: Wet Mount = 43% Affirm VP = 44% PAP Smear = 55% In-Pouch Culture = 63% Gen-Probe TMA = 96% CONCLUSIONS *Gen-Probe’s Trichomonas vaginalis assay is in research. C-120 C-120 The T. vaginalis assay method is easy to perform, could be automated or semi-automated, and the steps are identical to the Gen-Probe APTIMA R Combo 2 method used in many clinical laboratories to detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae from genital swab and urine specimens. While this study only included female vaginal swabs, future work with male urethral swabs and male and female urine specimens is planned. The commonly-used wet mount was the least sensitive method of the 4 comparator methods, in spite of an experienced staff in a STD clinic. In order of sensitivity: TMA test >culture >PAP smear >DNA probe Table 2. Total Positives for Each Test Method W et Affirm In-Pouch PAP Gen-ProbeRpt.Gen-Probe N =152 M ount Trich. Culture Sm ear TM A TM A Pos. TotalPositives: 22 23 32 28 55 49 ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• G en-Probe Proprietary T argetC apture T echnology one m icron m agnetic particle ––TTTTTTTTTTTTTT ––TTTTTTTTTTTTTT AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA GGATCGCCACGTAGATCGGCCTC ..... GAUCGAUCCCCCCUAGCGGUGCAUCUAGCAUCUA.... M agnet N S Bead Bead O ligo O ligo Capture Capture O ligo Oligo "Tail" "Tail" Target Target Sequence Sequence Capture Capture Sequence Sequence These are washed away: These are washed away: non-specific non-specific D N A/RN A D N A/RN A Protein Protein Celldebris Celldebris Plasm a Plasm a • •••• •••• •••• ••••••••• •••• H PA H PA H ybridization Protection A ssay H ybridization Protection A ssay W et A ffirm In-Pouch PAP G en-Probe No. M ount Trich. C ulture Sm ear RLU 1 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,535 2 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,519,518 3 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,041 4 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,040 5 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,096 6 NEG NEG M ISSED NEG 2,729 7 NEG NEG M ISSED NEG 4,091,962 8 NEG NEG NEG NEG 38,618 9 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,077 10 NEG NEG POS NEG 3,944,607 11 POS POS POS POS 4,428,650 12 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,002 13 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,596 14 NEG POS POS NEG 4,499,510 15 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,539 16 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,381 17 NEG NEG POS NEG 4,443,208 18 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,918 19 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,029,186 20 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,892 21 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,552 22 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,744 23 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,959 24 NEG NEG M ISSED NEG 2,281 25 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,872 26 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,953 27 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,863 28 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,763 29 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,425 30 POS NEG POS POS 4,375,037 31 NEG NEG NEG NEG 987,994 32 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,338 33 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,681 34 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,690 35 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,933 36 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,412 37 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,619 38 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,293 39 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,619 40 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,293 41 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,292 42 NEG NEG NEG NEG 4,473,835 43 NEG NEG POS NEG 4,540,391 44 POS POS POS POS 4,086,516 45 NEG NEG NEG NEG 4,262,457 46 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,327 47 POS POS POS POS 4,308,037 48 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,592 49 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,338 50 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,677 51 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,719 52 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,516 53 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,337 54 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,968,615 55 NEG POS POS POS 3,874,958 56 NEG NEG NEG NO R 1,426 57 POS POS POS POS 3,761,455 58 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,655 59 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,313 60 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,235 61 NEG POS POS NEG 3,719,187 62 NEG NEG NEG NEG 243,267 63 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,611 64 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,334 65 NEG NEG NEG NEG 4,966 66 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,304 67 POS POS POS POS 4,046,957 68 NEG NEG POS NEG 3,199,978 69 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,862,835 70 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,170 71 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,367 72 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,315 73 NEG NEG NEG NEG 7,433 74 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,786 75 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,702 76 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,455 77 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,561 78 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,734 79 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,791 80 NEG NEG NEG NEG 5,141,868 81 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,363 82 NEG NEG NEG NEG 5,839,039 83 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,166 84 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,701 85 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,581 86 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,373 87 NEG NEG POS POS 5,958,675 88 NEG NEG NEG POS 5,746,267 89 POS POS POS POS 5,974,230 90 POS POS POS POS 6,137,384 91 POS POS POS POS 5,425,522 92 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,545 93 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,640 94 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,775 95 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,417 96 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,376 97 POS POS POS POS 5,767,993 98 NEG NEG POS NEG 5,573,164 99 POS POS POS POS 9,106,003 100 NEG NEG POS NEG 5,589,897 101 POS POS POS POS 5,559,030 102 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,551 103 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,764 104 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,729 105 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,767 106 POS NEG POS POS 5,655,568 107 POS POS POS POS 6,149,147 108 NEG NEG NEG NEG 5,698,527 109 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,650 110 POS POS POS POS 6,250,286 111 POS POS POS POS 5,835,878 112 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,521 113 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,673 114 POS POS POS POS 7,709,815 115 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,604 116 NEG NEG NEG NEG 8,478 117 NEG NEG NEG NEG 4,037,866 118 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,767 119 NEG NEG NEG NEG 4,150,859 120 NEG NEG NEG NEG 4,071 121 NEG NEG NEG NO R 2,351 122 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,452 123 POS POS POS POS 4,418,451 124 NEG NEG NEG NEG 4,199,744 125 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,511,952 126 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,820,877 127 NEG NEG NEG NEG 226 128 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,154 129 NEG NEG NEG POS 2,486 130 NEG NEG NEG POS 1,996 131 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,958 132 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,069 133 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,335 134 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,431 135 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,944 136 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,704,381 137 NEG NEG NEG NEG 4,210,858 138 POS POS POS POS 4,329,830 139 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,361 140 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,184 141 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,443,951 142 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,978 143 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,209 144 POS POS POS POS 4,089,380 145 POS POS POS POS 3,994,075 146 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,896 147 NEG NEG NEG POS 3,979,386 148 NEG NEG NEG NO R 2,048 149 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,089 150 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,214 151 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,117 152 POS POS POS POS 4,419,082 W et A ffirm In-Pouch PAP G en-Probe No. M ount Trich. C ulture Sm ear RLU Manual sample pipetting Addition of target capture reagent Washing with wash buffer using target capture system Incubation for TMA Addition of probe , selection and detection reagents Reading using luminometer Addition of oil, amplification and enzyme reagents Figure 2. Target Capture Step Figure 3. TMA Step • Vaginal swabs (n=152) were collected from women attending an STD clinic at Wishard Memorial Hospital (Wishard) in Indianapolis, IN. • The following tests were performed to detect Trichomonas vaginalis at Wishard, using their standard laboratory methods: • Culture (In-Pouch TM TV, BioMed Diagnostics, Inc., San Jose, CA) for 96 hours, with microscopic examination every ~24 hours • DNA Probe (Affirm TM VP III Test, BD Diagnostics Systems, Sparks, Md) • Wet Mount • PAP smear, examined by 3 different cytologists • The specimens were shipped to Gen- The Trichomonas vaginalis assay procedure is illustrated in Figure 1. In brief: Target rRNA is separated from the other specimen components and the transport media by the addition of Target Capture Reagent, magnetic bead separation, and washing using a target capture system (Figure 2). • Amplification Reagent, Oil and Enzyme Reagent are added to the rRNA target on the magnetic beads. Isothermal TMA amplification occurs at 42 o C (Figure 3). • Detection occurs by HPA (Figure 4) and the reaction is read as Relative Light Units (RLU) in a LEADER R HC+ luminometer. Figure 4. HPA Step Table 1. Trichomonas vaginalis Test Results G en-P robe W etM ount A ffirm Trich.In-P ouch C ulture PAP Sm ear TM A Num ber P ositive P ositive P ositive P ositive P ositive 20 N egative N egative N egative N egative P ositive 21* N egative N egative P ositive N egative P ositive 6 N egative P ositive P ositive N egative P ositive 2 P ositive N egative P ositive P ositive P ositive 2 N egative N egative N egative P ositive P ositive 2 N egative N egative N egative P ositive N egative 2 N egative P ositive P ositive P ositive P ositive 1 N egative N egative P ositive P ositive P ositive 1 N egative N egative N egative N egative N egative 95 * 15 ofthese 21 w ere positive on repeattesting;one w as Q NS.

Transcript of Rapid Detection of Trichomonas vaginalis from Vaginal Specimens by Transcription- Mediated...

Page 1: Rapid Detection of Trichomonas vaginalis from Vaginal Specimens by Transcription- Mediated Amplification A. Sitay 1, J. Bungo 1, K. Dickey 1, W. Weisburg.

Rapid Detection of Trichomonas vaginalis from Vaginal Specimens by Transcription-Mediated Amplification

A. Sitay1, J. Bungo1, K. Dickey1, W. Weisburg1, T. Aguirre2, D. Fuller2, L. Jasper2, T. Davis2; 1Gen-Probe Incorporated, San Diego, CA; 2Wishard Memorial Hospital, Indianapolis, IN

Figure 1. Trichomonas Assay Procedure

Background: Trichomonas vaginalis (Tvag) is a common cause of sexually transmitted disease (STD), with an estimated 5 million new cases occurring annually in the U.S. Ten to 50% of infections are asymptomatic. Diagnosis of Tvag infection is problematic. The commonly used wet mount, while rapid, has low sensitivity. Culture and Pap stain are lengthy procedures and technically challenging. A rapid, amplified assay system is described here for detection of Tvag. Methods: The test includes target capture, Transcription-Mediated Amplification (TMA) and a Hybridization Protection Assay (HPA). Target capture uses specific DNA capture oligos and magnetic beads for separation of target rRNA from clinical specimens. TMA amplifies a specific region of the target rRNA. HPA uses a chemiluminescent probe in a homogenous assay format whereby probe binds specifically to Tvag amplicon and is induced to emit light. Results: A total of 152 vaginal swabs from patients attending STD clinics were tested in the Tvag assay system at Gen-Probe Incorporated and compared with wet mount, InPouch culture, BD Affirm, and Pap stain performed at Wishard Memorial Hospital. Thirty-six specimens were positive by any one of the 4 comparator methods; 34 of these were positive by TMA. One hundred sixteen specimens were negative for T. vaginalis by all 4 comparator methods; 95 of these were negative by TMA and 21 were positive by TMA. The apparent sensitivity and specificity of the TMA assay were 94% and 82%, respectively. It is unclear if the TMA+, comparator- specimens are TMA false positive results or reflect the greater sensitivity of target amplification. Fifteen of the 21 TMA+, comparator- specimens were positive on repeat TMA testing, suggesting that they may be true positives. If this is the case, the sensitivity and specificity would be 96% and 94%, respectively. The remaining six may be false positives or contain such low concentrations of T. vaginalis as to be subject to sampling variation. Conclusions: Our results suggest that target amplification may be a more rapid and sensitive method to detect T. vaginalis than alternative methods, including culture.*

ABSTRACT

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Table 3. Test Comparison for Detection of T. vaginalis

RESULTS

A total of 152 vaginal swab specimens were tested at Wishard and at Gen-Probe to help determine the feasibility of a TMA-based method for the detection of T. vaginalis from vaginal swabs (Table 1). A preliminary cut-off of 30,000 RLU was used to evaluate the TMA test data. Thirty-six specimens (24% prevalence) were positive by any one of the 4 comparator methods; 34 of these were positive by TMA. Two specimens that were positive only by the PAP smear method (only by one of the 3 cytologists in one case and by 2 of the 3 in the other case) were negative by the TMA method. Of the 116 specimens that were negative by all 4 comparator methods, 95 were negative by TMA and 21 were positive by TMA. Fifteen of the 21 TMA+/comparator- specimens were positive on repeat TMA testing, and one was unavailable for a repeat test. This suggests that the 15 may be true positives. The remaining 6 may be false positives or contain such low concentrations of T. vaginalis as to be subject to sampling errors. If the 15 TMA+/comparator- specimens were considered to be true positives, then the TMA test sensitivity would be 96% and the specificity 94%. A summary of the total positive tests for each method for the 152 swab specimens is shown in Table 2. A summary of a selected set of test comparisons is shown in Table 3. Assuming that the total number of true positive results is 51 (49 repeat + TMA tests, and 2 + by PAP only), then the actual prevalence of T. vaginalis infection in this population was 34%, and the sensitivity of each test method was:

Wet Mount = 43% Affirm VP = 44% PAP Smear = 55% In-Pouch Culture = 63% Gen-Probe TMA = 96%

CONCLUSIONS

*Gen-Probe’s Trichomonas vaginalis assay is in research.

C-120C-120

The T. vaginalis assay method is easy to perform, could be automated or semi-automated, and the steps are identical to the Gen-Probe APTIMAR Combo 2 method used in many clinical laboratories to detect Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae from genital swab and urine specimens. While this study only included female vaginal swabs, future work with male urethral swabs and male and female urine specimens is planned. The commonly-used wet mount was the least sensitive method of the 4 comparator methods, in spite of an experienced staff in a STD clinic. In order of sensitivity: TMA test >culture >PAP smear >DNA probe >Wet Mount. Our results suggest that target amplification may be a more rapid and sensitive method to detect T. vaginalis than alternative methods, including culture.

Table 2. Total Positives for Each Test Method Wet Affirm In-Pouch PAP Gen-Probe Rpt.Gen-Probe

N=152 Mount Trich. Culture Smear TMA TMA Pos.Total Positives: 22 23 32 28 55 49

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

Gen-Probe Proprietary Target Capture Technology

onemicron

magneticparticle

––T

TTT

TTT

TTT

TTT

T

––TTTTTTTTTTTTTT

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGA

TCG

CCA

CGT

AGA

TCG

GCC

TC

...

..G

AUC

GAU

CCC

CCC

UAG

CGG

UGCAU

CUA

GCA

UCU

A..

..

Mag

net

N

S

Bead Bead OligoOligo

Capture Capture OligoOligo "Tail" "Tail"

Target Target SequenceSequence

Capture Capture SequenceSequence

These are washed away:These are washed away:

non-specific non-specific DNA/RNADNA/RNA

ProteinProteinCell debrisCell debris

PlasmaPlasma

••••••••••••••••••••••••••

HPAHPAHybridization Protection AssayHybridization Protection Assay

Wet Affirm In-Pouch PAP Gen-ProbeNo. Mount Trich. Culture Smear RLU

1 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,5352 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,519,5183 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,0414 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,0405 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,0966 NEG NEG MISSED NEG 2,7297 NEG NEG MISSED NEG 4,091,9628 NEG NEG NEG NEG 38,6189 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,07710 NEG NEG POS NEG 3,944,60711 POS POS POS POS 4,428,65012 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,00213 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,59614 NEG POS POS NEG 4,499,51015 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,53916 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,38117 NEG NEG POS NEG 4,443,20818 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,91819 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,029,18620 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,89221 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,55222 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,74423 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,95924 NEG NEG MISSED NEG 2,28125 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,87226 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,95327 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,86328 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,76329 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,42530 POS NEG POS POS 4,375,03731 NEG NEG NEG NEG 987,99432 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,33833 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,68134 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,69035 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,93336 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,41237 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,61938 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,29339 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,61940 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,29341 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,29242 NEG NEG NEG NEG 4,473,83543 NEG NEG POS NEG 4,540,39144 POS POS POS POS 4,086,51645 NEG NEG NEG NEG 4,262,45746 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,32747 POS POS POS POS 4,308,03748 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,59249 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,33850 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,67751 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,71952 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,51653 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,33754 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,968,61555 NEG POS POS POS 3,874,95856 NEG NEG NEG NO R 1,42657 POS POS POS POS 3,761,45558 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,65559 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,31360 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,23561 NEG POS POS NEG 3,719,18762 NEG NEG NEG NEG 243,26763 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,61164 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,33465 NEG NEG NEG NEG 4,96666 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,30467 POS POS POS POS 4,046,95768 NEG NEG POS NEG 3,199,97869 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,862,83570 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,17071 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,36772 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,315

73 NEG NEG NEG NEG 7,43374 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,78675 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,70276 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,45577 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,56178 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,73479 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,79180 NEG NEG NEG NEG 5,141,86881 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,36382 NEG NEG NEG NEG 5,839,03983 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,16684 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,70185 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,58186 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,37387 NEG NEG POS POS 5,958,67588 NEG NEG NEG POS 5,746,26789 POS POS POS POS 5,974,23090 POS POS POS POS 6,137,38491 POS POS POS POS 5,425,52292 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,54593 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,64094 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,77595 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,41796 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,37697 POS POS POS POS 5,767,99398 NEG NEG POS NEG 5,573,16499 POS POS POS POS 9,106,003100 NEG NEG POS NEG 5,589,897101 POS POS POS POS 5,559,030102 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,551103 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,764104 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,729105 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,767106 POS NEG POS POS 5,655,568107 POS POS POS POS 6,149,147108 NEG NEG NEG NEG 5,698,527109 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,650110 POS POS POS POS 6,250,286111 POS POS POS POS 5,835,878112 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,521113 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,673114 POS POS POS POS 7,709,815115 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,604116 NEG NEG NEG NEG 8,478117 NEG NEG NEG NEG 4,037,866118 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,767119 NEG NEG NEG NEG 4,150,859120 NEG NEG NEG NEG 4,071121 NEG NEG NEG NO R 2,351122 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,452123 POS POS POS POS 4,418,451124 NEG NEG NEG NEG 4,199,744125 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,511,952126 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,820,877127 NEG NEG NEG NEG 226128 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,154129 NEG NEG NEG POS 2,486130 NEG NEG NEG POS 1,996131 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,958132 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,069133 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,335134 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,431135 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,944136 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,704,381137 NEG NEG NEG NEG 4,210,858138 POS POS POS POS 4,329,830139 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,361140 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,184141 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,443,951142 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,978143 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,209144 POS POS POS POS 4,089,380145 POS POS POS POS 3,994,075146 NEG NEG NEG NEG 1,896

147 NEG NEG NEG POS 3,979,386148 NEG NEG NEG NO R 2,048149 NEG NEG NEG NEG 3,089150 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,214151 NEG NEG NEG NEG 2,117152 POS POS POS POS 4,419,082

Wet Affirm In-Pouch PAP Gen-ProbeNo. Mount Trich. Culture Smear RLU

Manual sample pipetting

Addition of target capture reagent

Washing with wash buffer using target capture system

Incubation for TMA

Addition of probe , selection and detection reagents

Reading using luminometer

Addition of oil, amplification and

enzyme reagents

Figure 2. Target Capture StepFigure 3. TMA Step

• Vaginal swabs (n=152) were collected from women attending an STD clinic at Wishard Memorial Hospital (Wishard) in Indianapolis, IN. • The following tests were performed to detect Trichomonas vaginalis at Wishard, using their standard laboratory methods:

• Culture (In-PouchTM TV, BioMed Diagnostics, Inc., San Jose, CA) for 96 hours, with microscopic examination every ~24 hours• DNA Probe (AffirmTM VP III Test, BD Diagnostics Systems, Sparks, Md)• Wet Mount• PAP smear, examined by 3 different cytologists

• The specimens were shipped to Gen-Probe Incorporated in swab transport media tubes and stored at 2-8oC until testing. The TMA tests were performed at Gen-Probe.

The Trichomonas vaginalis assay procedure is illustrated in Figure 1. In brief:

• Target rRNA is separated from the other specimen components and the transport media by the addition of Target Capture Reagent, magnetic bead separation, and washing using a target capture system (Figure 2).• Amplification Reagent, Oil and Enzyme Reagent are added to the rRNA target on the magnetic beads. Isothermal TMA amplification occurs at 42oC (Figure 3).• Detection occurs by HPA (Figure 4) and the reaction is read as Relative Light Units (RLU) in a LEADERR HC+ luminometer.

Figure 4. HPA Step

Table 1. Trichomonas vaginalis Test Results

Gen-ProbeWet Mount Affirm Trich. In-Pouch Culture PAP Smear TMA Number

Positive Positive Positive Positive Positive 20Negative Negative Negative Negative Positive 21*Negative Negative Positive Negative Positive 6Negative Positive Positive Negative Positive 2Positive Negative Positive Positive Positive 2Negative Negative Negative Positive Positive 2Negative Negative Negative Positive Negative 2Negative Positive Positive Positive Positive 1Negative Negative Positive Positive Positive 1Negative Negative Negative Negative Negative 95

* 15 of these 21 were positive on repeat testing; one was QNS.