Raja vs the State of Karnataka by on 27 June, 2012
2
Karnataka High Court Raja vs The State Of Karnataka By on 27 June, 2012 Author: Subhash B.Adi 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2012 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH B ADI CRL.P No.3197/2012 BETWEEN : RAJA, S/O VENKATACHAL, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, R/AT GERUPALYA VILLAGE, KENGERI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TQ. BANGALORE. ...PETITIONER ( By Sri. GAJENDRA C., ADV.) AND : THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY RAMANAGARA DISTRICT REP. BY THEIR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE ...RESPONDENT ( By Sri. G.M. SRINIVASA REDDY, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.P.C. PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR. NO.211/2012 OF BIDADI P.S., RAMANAGARA, FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 143, 147, 148, 341, 307, 324 R/W SEC. 149 OF IPC. THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: 2 Raja vs The State Of Karnataka By on 27 June, 2012 Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/98238763/ 1
-
Upload
a-common-man-mahi -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
5
description
sfwwrrxfsf
Transcript of Raja vs the State of Karnataka by on 27 June, 2012
Karnataka High CourtRaja vs The State Of Karnataka By on 27 June, 2012Author: Subhash B.Adi 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2012
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHASH B ADI
CRL.P No.3197/2012
BETWEEN :
RAJA, S/O VENKATACHAL, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, R/AT GERUPALYA VILLAGE, KENGERI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TQ. BANGALORE. ...PETITIONER ( By Sri. GAJENDRA C., ADV.)
AND :
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY RAMANAGARA DISTRICT REP. BY THEIR PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE
...RESPONDENT ( By Sri. G.M. SRINIVASA REDDY, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.P.C.PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR. NO.211/2012OF BIDADI P.S., RAMANAGARA, FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 143, 147,148, 341, 307, 324 R/W SEC. 149 OF IPC.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: 2
Raja vs The State Of Karnataka By on 27 June, 2012
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/98238763/ 1
ORDER
The petitioner is the accused No.2 in Crime No.211/2012 registered by the Bidadi Police Station,Ramanagara, for the offenses punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 307, 324 r/w Section149 of IPC.
2. No doubt, it is true that there is an allegation that the injuries caused on the forehead of theinjured. The injury mentioned in the discharge summary do not reflect the corresponding injuries .Even the other injuries are simple in nature. The petitioner has been in judicial custody for last morethan 2 ½ months.
3. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. Petitioner is enlarged on bail subject to the followingconditions:
(i) The petitioner shall execute a personal bond for Rs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties for the likesum to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.
(ii) The petitioner shall regularly attend the Court on hearing dates.
(iii) The petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses.
Sd/-
JUDGE snc
Raja vs The State Of Karnataka By on 27 June, 2012
Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/98238763/ 2
