Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A....

108
©UW and David Zamora 1 Question

Transcript of Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A....

Page 1: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 1

Question

Page 2: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 2

Answer

B. The same for both patients

Page 3: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 3

Question

Page 4: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 4

Answer

A. The patient dose will be higher for the smaller patient

Page 5: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 5

Question

Page 6: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 6

Answer

B. The radiation dose will increase

Page 7: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 7

Question

Page 8: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 8

Answer

C. Will decrease with increasing patient size

Page 9: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 9

Question

Page 10: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 10

Answer

C. 10-50 mGy

Page 11: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 11

Question

Page 12: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 12

Answer

A. Increasing slice thickness increases the number of photons (signal) used to acquire the image and decreases noise therefore increasing image contrast. B. Spatial resolution will worsen because each voxel will be larger. This will cause more averaging of attenuation coefficients due to more tissue types in the slice, worsening spatial resolution.D. PVA will increase due to the larger voxels covering multiple tissue types.

Answer

Page 13: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 13

Question

Page 14: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 14

Answer

A. decreases As the pixel size decreases, there are fewer photons passing through it. This increases noise thus lowering the SNR.

Page 15: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 15

Question

Page 16: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 16

Answer

B. increases

Page 17: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 17

Question

Increasing the kVp in CT while maintaining the mAs constant will result in a decrease in which of the following?

A. Anode heat loadingB. CTDIvol

C. Subject contrastD. Partial volume averaging

Page 18: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 18

Answer

Increasing the kVp in CT while maintaining the mAs constant will result in a decrease in which of the following?

A. Anode heat loadingB. CTDIvol

C. Subject contrastD. Partial volume averaging

Page 19: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 19

Question

When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise:

A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40%C. Increases by 40%D. Doubles

Page 20: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 20

Answer

When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise:

A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40%C. Increases by 40%D. Doubles Sqrt(5.0/2.5) = 1.4

Page 21: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 21

Question

What determines the minimum possible reconstructed slice thickness on a multi-slice CT unit?

A. Detector widthB. Pitch factorC. Detector binningD. Bed translation speed

Page 22: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 22

Answer

What determines the minimum possible reconstructed slice thickness on a multi-slice CT unit?

A. Detector widthB. Pitch factorC. Detector binningD. Bed translation speed

Page 23: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 23

Question

The CTDIvol displayed on the dose summary page following an abdomen scan of an adult patient is 40 mGy. The effective diameter of the patient is 38 cm. The actual dose to the patient in this case would be:

A. Less than 40 mGyB. 40 mGyC. More than 40 mGy

Page 24: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 24

Answer

The CTDIvol displayed on the dose summary page following an abdomen scan of an adult patient is 40 mGy. The effective diameter of the patient is 38 cm. The actual dose to the patient in this case would be:

A. Less than 40 mGyB. 40 mGyC. More than 40 mGy

Page 25: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 25

Question

Reducing which of the following will minimize partial volume artifacts in CT?

A. Section thicknessB. Scan timeC. Focal spot sizeD. Scan length

Page 26: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 26

Answer

Reducing which of the following will minimize partial volume artifacts in CT?

A. Section thicknessB. Scan timeC. Focal spot sizeD. Scan length

Page 27: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 27

Question

Which of the following CT exams has the highest effective dose?

A. Abdomen/PelvisB. HeadC. C-spineD. Chest

Page 28: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 28

Answer

Which of the following CT exams has the highest effective dose?

A. Abdomen/PelvisB. HeadC. C-spineD. Chest

Page 29: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 29

Question

Page 30: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 30

Answer

A. Dose length product

Page 31: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

31©UW and DPS

Question

Page 32: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

32©UW and DPS

Answer

Page 33: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

33©UW and DPS

Question

Page 34: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

34©UW and DPS

Answer

Page 35: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

35©UW and DPS

Which one of the following scenarios will result in the highest skin dose to the patient?

A. B. C. D.

Question

Page 36: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

36©UW and DPS

Which one of the following scenarios will result in the highest skin dose to the patient?

A. B. C. D.

B. Short SSD plus large SID results in higher patient dose. Use of the grid also requires higher patient dose.

Answer

Page 37: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

37©UW and DPS

Question

Page 38: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

38©UW and DPS

Answer

Page 39: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

39©UW and DPS

Increasing the usage of electronic magnification mode in most fluoroscopy systems results in:

A. Increased quantum mottleB. Greater spatial distortionC. Increased patient doseD. More scattered radiationE. More minification

Question

Page 40: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

40©UW and DPS

Increasing the usage of electronic magnification mode in most fluoroscopy systems results in:

A. Increased quantum mottleB. Greater spatial distortionC. Increased patient doseD. More scattered radiationE. More minification

C. The cost of using higher mag modes is radiation dose.

Answer

Page 41: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

41©UW and DPS

Question

Page 42: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

42©UW and DPS

Answer

Page 43: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

43©UW and DPS

AAPM PC: If we modify the SID from 72” to 40”, which of the following will occur?

A. Radiation dose to patient will decrease by 4xB. Image spatial resolution will increaseC. Image noise will increaseD. The object of interest will appear larger on the image

Question

Page 44: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

44©UW and DPS

AAPM PC: If we modify the SID from 72” to 40”, which of the following will occur?

A. Radiation dose to patient will decrease by 4xB. Image spatial resolution will increaseC. Image noise will increaseD. The object of interest will appear larger on the image

D. Mag factor is defined as SID/SOD. Decreasing SID also decreases SOD, but the ratio of SID/SOD increases since OID stays the same. Appearance of more magnification

Answer

Page 45: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

45©UW and DPS

AAPM PC: What is the single most important component of a radiographic system for determining patient dose:

A. Focal spot sizeB. X-ray generator power ratingC. X-ray generator type (3-phase, high freq, falling load)D. Parameter settings on the AECE. Table attenuation

Question

Page 46: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

46©UW and DPS

AAPM PC: What is the single most important component of a radiographic system for determining patient dose:

A. Focal spot sizeB. X-ray generator power ratingC. X-ray generator type (3-phase, high freq, falling load)D. Parameter settings on the AECE. Table attenuation

D. The AEC drives how much exposure is getting to the detector, which drives the x-ray tube output.

Answer

Page 47: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

47©UW and DPS

AAPM PC: Detection of a large, low contrast object in a noisy image can be improved by:

A. Applying edge enhancementB. Applying image smoothingC. Increasing window widthD. Digitally magnifying the image

Question

Page 48: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

48©UW and DPS

AAPM PC: Detection of a large, low contrast object in a noisy image can be improved by:

A. Applying edge enhancementB. Applying image smoothingC. Increasing window widthD. Digitally magnifying the image

B – applying smoothing reduces noise without reducing contrast. Edge enhancement (A) increases noise and will decrease conspicuity. Increasing WW (C) will decrease apparent noise, but also decreases display contrast which hurts conspicuity. Digitally magnifying the object forces the eye to concentrate on noise. Often, it helps to minify b/c that increases averaging of pixels in the eye and effectively smooths the image.

Answer

Page 49: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

49©UW and DPS

AAPM PC: Which of the following will improve low contrast resolution in a radiographic image?

A. A change from 10:1 to an 8:1 gridB. Move the patient closer to the image receptorC. Reduce mAsD. Use a smaller field of view

Question

Page 50: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

50©UW and DPS

AAPM PC: Which of the following will improve low contrast resolution in a radiographic image?

A. A change from 10:1 to an 8:1 gridB. Move the patient closer to the image receptorC. Reduce mAsD. Use a smaller field of view

D – Using a smaller FOV results in less scatter contribution, and less scatter reaching the image receptor. As scatter decreases, low contrast resolution increases. A) would allow more scatter through, B) is the opposite of an ‘air gap’ technique, C) worsens stats, increases noise.

Answer

Page 51: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

51©UW and DPS

AAPM PC: For a KUB on an avg patient, what would be a reasonable technique considering dose, contrast, noise, and

motion:

A. 75 kVp, 400 mA, 50 msB. 120 kVp, 800 mA, 15 msC. 50 kVp, 100 mA, 500 msD. 75 kVp, 100 mA, 25 msE. None of the above

Question

Page 52: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

52©UW and DPS

AAPM PC: For a KUB on an avg patient, what would be a reasonable technique considering dose, contrast, noise, and

motion:A. 75 kVp, 400 mA, 50 msB. 120 kVp, 800 mA, 15 msC. 50 kVp, 100 mA, 500 msD. 75 kVp, 100 mA, 25 msE. None of the above

A – rule of thumb on these, ~ 80 kVp and 20mAs for AP work.

Answer

Page 53: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

53©UW and DPS

Question

Page 54: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

54©UW and DPS

Answer

Page 55: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

55©UW and DPS

AAPM PC: Assuming AEC, radiograph at level of kidneys. For a pregnant patient, what is best way to minimize fetal dose?

A. Use high kVp, since it will lower mAs and decrease doseB. Wrap abdomen in lead apron to cover fetusC. Collimate to cover smallest regions possibleD. Have patient lay prone instead of supineE. Remove grid

Question

Page 56: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

56©UW and DPS

AAPM PC: Assuming AEC, radiograph at level of kidneys. For a pregnant patient, what is best way to minimize fetal

dose?A. Use high kVp, since it will lower mAs and decrease doseB. Wrap abdomen in lead apron to cover fetusC. Collimate to cover smallest regions possibleD. Have patient lay prone instead of supineE. Remove grid

C

Answer

Page 57: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

57©UW and DPS

AAPM PC: The patient skin dose will be reduced by using _________.

A. More added filtrationB. Higher grid ratioC. Lower kVpD. Smaller focal spot sizeE. None of the above

Question

Page 58: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

58©UW and DPS

AAPM PC: The patient skin dose will be reduced by using _________.

A. More added filtrationB. Higher grid ratioC. Lower kVpD. Smaller focal spot sizeE. None of the above

A is the best answer. Added filtration increases the average photon energy via preferential attenuation of lower energy x-rays. Higher avg photon energies increase the proportion of x-rays passing through the patient without interacting.

Answer

Page 59: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

59©UW and DPS

Question

Page 60: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

60©UW and DPS

Answer

Page 61: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

61©UW and DPS

Question

Page 62: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

62©UW and DPS

Answer

Page 63: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

63©UW and DPS

Question

Page 64: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

64©UW and DPS

Answer

Page 65: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

65©UW and DPS

Question

Page 66: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

66©UW and DPS

Answer

Page 67: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

67©UW and DPS

The decision is made to add 1 mm Al permanently to the filtration of an x-ray beam. This is done to reduce ____.

A. Load on the x-ray tubeB. Scatter into the detection systemC. Maximum field sizeD. Overall system latitudeE. Patient skin dose

Question

Page 68: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

68©UW and DPS

The decision is made to add 1 mm Al permanently to the filtration of an x-ray beam. This is done to reduce ____.

A. Load on the x-ray tubeB. Scatter into the detection systemC. Maximum field sizeD. Overall system latitudeE. Patient skin dose

E. Most of the soft (i.e. low energy) radiation in an x-ray beam is absorbed in the patient and does not contribute to the image. Hardening the beam, by adding filtration, reduces the patient’s skin dose for the same radiation reaching the detector.

Answer

Page 69: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

69©UW and DPS

What is the effect of magnification on mammography patient dose?

A. IncreasesB. DecreasesC. Has no effect

Question

Page 70: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

70©UW and DPS

What is the effect of magnification on mammography patient dose?

A. IncreasesB. DecreasesC. Has no effect

A. Entrance skin exposure and breast dose are reduced because no grid is used but are increased due to the shorter focus to breast distance.

Answer

Page 71: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

71©UW and DPS

Compression in mammography results in increased:

A. Breast doseB. Geometric blurringC. Patient motionD. ScatterE. None of the above

Question

Page 72: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

72©UW and DPS

Compression in mammography results in increased:

A. Breast doseB. Geometric blurringC. Patient motionD. ScatterE. None of the above

E. Patient motion, blurring, scatter and dose all reduce due to compression of breast.

Answer

Page 73: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

73©UW and DPS

Question

Page 74: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

74©UW and DPS

Answer

Page 75: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

75©UW and DPS

Question

Page 76: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

76©UW and DPS

Answer

Page 77: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

77©UW and DPS

Question

The bulk modulus describes which of the following characteristics of a medium?

A. stiffnessB. densityC. impedanceD. amplitude

Question

Page 78: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

78©UW and DPS

AnswerThe bulk modulus describes which of the following characteristics of a medium?

A. stiffness

The bulk modulus describes the resistance to compression of a medium under pressure. “Compressibility” “Rigidity” or “Stiffness” are terms you may see.

Though they are related, Density and Bulk Modulus are not the same property.

Answer

Page 79: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

79©UW and DPS

Question

Sound travels fastest in which of the following?

A. lungB. boneC. bloodD. fat

Question

Page 80: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

80©UW and DPS

AnswerSound travels fastest in which of the following?

A. lungB. boneC. bloodD. fat

The speed of sound in a medium is dependent on two properties—density and a property known as the bulk modulus. The bulk modulus is a measure of compressibility. The less compressible a given medium is, the faster sound will travel through it given its mechanical wave properties. Sound travels significantly slower through air than bone for this reason.

Answer

Page 81: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

81©UW and DPS

Question

Medical ultrasound typically operates in which of the following frequency ranges?

A. 1–100 HzB. 1–100 kHz C. 1–10 MHz D. 1–10 GHz

Question

Page 82: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

82©UW and DPS

AnswerMedical ultrasound typically operates in which of the following frequency ranges?

A. 1–100 HzB. 1–100 kHz C. 1–10 MHz D. 1–10 GHz

Modern ultrasound transducers operate on the order of 1 to 10 MHz for clinical procedures. Human hearing is on the order of 20 to 20,000 Hz.

Doppler shifts are in the low kHz range.

Answer

Page 83: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

83©UW and DPS

Question

If the frequency used to image a liver is 8 MHz, what is the approximate wavelength of the ultrasound beam in tissue?

A. 0.2 mm B. 2.0 mm C. 2.0 cm D. 20cm

Question

Page 84: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

84©UW and DPS

Question

Answer

If the frequency used to image a liver is 8 MHz, what is the approximate wavelength of the ultrasound beam in tissue?

A. 0.2 mm B. 2.0 mm C. 2.0 cm D. 20cm

Can we solve this? If so, how?

Page 85: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

85©UW and DPS

AnswerAnswer

Page 86: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

86©UW and DPS

AnswerAnswer

Page 87: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

87©UW and DPS

Question

If the relative intensity between the original and received ultrasound is cut in half, this will account for a loss of how many decibels?A. -1 B. -3C. -20 D. -100

Question

Page 88: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

88©UW and DPS

AnswerIf the relative intensity between the original and received ultrasound is cut in half, this will account for a loss of how many decibels?

A. -1 B. -3 C. -20D. -100

Given the equation relative intensity (db) = 10log (I2/I1):(db) = 10log (1/2) = 10(-0.301) = -3

Answer

Page 89: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

89©UW and DPS

AnswerAnswer

Page 90: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

90©UW and DPS

Question

The main disadvantage of using multiple focal zones for ultrasound imaging is decreased:

A. lateral resolutionB. temporal resolution C. axial resolution D. elevational resolution

Question

Page 91: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

91©UW and DPS

Answer

The main disadvantage of using multiple focal zones for ultrasound imaging is decreased:

A. lateral resolutionB. temporal resolution C. axial resolution D. elevational resolution

When using multiple-layer focal zones, the system needs more time to process the ultrasound beam transmitting and receiving from multiple distances before stitching the image together. This will decrease frame rate and thus decrease temporal resolution.

Answer

Page 92: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

92©UW and DPS

Question

In order to resolve an object in the axial plane using ultrasound, the boundaries between objects must be separated by a minimum of:

A. less than one spatial pulse length B. less than half a spatial pulse length C. greater than one spatial pulse length D. greater than half a spatial pulse length

Question

Page 93: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

93©UW and DPS

Answer

In order to resolve an object in the axial plane using ultrasound, the boundaries between objects must be separated by a minimum of:

A. less than one spatial pulse length B. less than half a spatial pulse length C. greater than one spatial pulse length D. greater than half a spatial pulse length

In order to resolve an object in the axial plane using ultrasound, the boundaries between objects must be separated by greater than one half of the spatial pulse length. If the separation between two objects is less than this, the returning signals will overlap and be seen as originating from one object. Using higher frequencies will reduce wavelength (and SPL) thus improve axial resolution.

Answer

Page 94: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

94©UW and DPS

Answer

• Axial resolution (linear, range, longitudinal or depth resolution) is the ability to separate two objects lying along the axis of the beam

• The minimal required separation distance between two boundaries is ½ Spatial Pulse Length (about ½ λ) to avoid overlap of returning echoes

• Higher frequencies reduce Spatial Pulse Length, improving axial resolution however, increases attenuation

• Axial resolution remains constant with depth

Answer

Page 95: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

95©UW and DPS

Question

Lateral resolution is primarily dependent on which of the following in ultrasound?

A. depthB. frame rate C. amplitude D. spatial pulse length

Question

Page 96: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

96©UW and DPS

AnswerLateral resolution is primarily dependent on which of the following in ultrasound?

A. depthB. frame rate C. amplitude D. spatial pulse length

Lateral resolution is dependent on beam width. For both linear and curvilinear transducers, the beam width changes with depth in the near and far fields. Therefore, lateral resolution is directly dependent on depth as well. The frequency should be adjusted accordingly when imaging in order to focus directly on the organ of interest.

Answer

Page 97: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

97©UW and DPS

Question

Reflective properties of sound at a tissue interface are determined by all of the following properties of tissues except ____________.

A. Acoustic impedanceB. DensityC. Speed of soundD. Attenuation coefficient

Question

Page 98: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

98©UW and DPS

Answer

Reflective properties of sound at a tissue interface are determined by all of the following properties of tissues except ____________.

A. Acoustic impedanceB. DensityC. Speed of soundD. Attenuation coefficient

The primary factor determining the reflective properties is the change in acoustic impedance. Acoustic impedance: Z = ρ · c, units are rayl [kg/m2-sec]

Answer

Page 99: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

99©UW and DPS

Question

Question

The reflection coefficient is greatest for which of the following tissue interfaces?

A. liver-fatB. muscle-lungC. muscle-boneD. fat-muscleE. cornea-aqueous humour

Page 100: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

100©UW and DPS

Question

Question

The reflection coefficient is greatest for which of the following tissue interfaces?

A. liver-fatB. muscle-lungC. muscle-boneD. fat-muscleE. cornea-aqueous humour

Material Acoustic Impedance, Z

Air 0.00043Lung 0.18Fat 1.42Castor Oil 1.40Water 1.48Soft Tissue ~1.45Brain 1.56Blood 1.6Kidney 1.61Liver 1.64Muscle 1.63Eye Lens 1.83Bone 6.12

Page 101: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

101©UW and DPS

Question

Answer

The reflection coefficient is greatest for which of the following tissue interfaces? A. liver-fatB. muscle-lungC. muscle-boneD. fat-muscleE. cornea-aqueous humour

Muscle lung has the greatest difference in Z (mainly due to air/lung being very very low) Muscle-bone would be the next greatest.

Page 102: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 102

• Q: What is the artifact seen in this image of Adenomyomatosis of the gall bladder?

• A. mirror image artifact • B. refraction artifact• C. comet tail artifact • D. aliasing

Ultrasound Review

Page 103: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 103

• Q: What is the artifact seen in this image of Adenomyomatosis of the gall bladder?

C. comet tail artifact

Ultrasound Review

Adenomyomatosis is a diseased state of the gallbladder in which the gallbladder wall is excessively thick. Cholesterol crystals within the lumina are responsible for the artifact in this case. When there is a serious mismatch in acoustic impedance between surfaces, reverberations from highly reflective interface are repeatedly reflected and arrive at the transducer later than the actual echo. Erroneously received reflections create bands at lower depths are called comet tails.

Page 104: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 104

• Q: What is the artifact seen in this image of Adenomyomatosis of the gall bladder?

C. comet tail artifact

Ultrasound Review

Comet tails are a type of reverberation artifact in which sequential echoes are closely spaced and display a triangular tapered shape. Other reverberation artifacts can appear as multiple equally spaced signals extending into the deep field, as shown in the image of a palpable mass to the right.

Page 105: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 105

• Q: What is the name of the artifact that occurs when the Doppler sampling rate is less than twice the Doppler frequency shift?

• A. aliasing artifact• B. mirror image artifact• C. reverberation artifact• D. erroneous sample artifact

Ultrasound Review

Page 106: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 106

• Q: What is the name of the artifact that occurs when the Doppler sampling rate is less than twice the Doppler frequency shift?

A. aliasing artifact

Ultrasound Review

In the pulsed Doppler imaging, sampling rate or pulse repetition frequency (PRF) is set by the sonographer. Sampling rate (PRF) must be at least twice the maximum frequency shift present to satisfy the Nyquist sampling criterion. (ie- PRF of at least 20 Khz is required for a Doppler shift of 10 Khz) One half of the PRF is called Nyquist frequency limit.

Doppler shifts above the Nyquist frequency limit wrap around and are displayed as a low-frequency shift—an artifact. Some ways to avoid this artifact include increasing the PRF, moving the color baseline up or down, or increasing the velocity scale.

Page 107: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 107

• Q: Identify the artifact depicted by the arrow in the image below

• A. mirror-image artifact• B. ring artifact• C. banding artifact• D. echo artifact

Ultrasound Review

Page 108: Question · Question. When slice thickness is changed from 2.5 mm to 5.0 mm, image noise: A. Decreases by ½ B. Decreases by 40% C. Increases by 40% D. Doubles ©UW and David Zamora.

©UW and David Zamora 108

• Q: Identify the artifact depicted by the arrow in the image below

• A. mirror-image artifact

Ultrasound Review

Structures located in front of highly reflective surfaces may scatter sound off-axis.The delayed arrival of these signals is interpreted as a mirror image at a deeper location by the transducer.

This image of the right hepatic lobe shows an echogenic lesion in the right hepatic lobe (cursors) and a duplicated echogenic lesion (arrow) equidistant from the diaphragm overlying the expected location of lung parenchyma.