Quantiative assessment measures for developing Green Economy

download Quantiative assessment measures for developing Green Economy

If you can't read please download the document

Transcript of Quantiative assessment measures for developing Green Economy

  • Quantitative assessment measures for developing

    Green Economy/SCP strategic policies

  • What is the Green Economy/Sustainable Consumption and Production?

    Customized definition, depending on country context and needs

    As a result, various models could be used to analyze it, some are static and some dynamic.

    Available options covering economy, environment and society: Indicators, Input-Output, Social Accounting

    Matrix (SAM), Geographic Information System (GIS);

    Econometrics, optimization, system dynamics.

  • What is the gap (opportunity) for a Green Economy model?

    Need to support policy formulation and evaluation

    Need to assess policies and investments according to their impact across sectors (improving the performance of the system, rather than focusing on single indicators).

  • Whats behind the Green Economy/SCP model?

    A correct (although simplified) representation of reality demands careful consideration of : Policy

    What interventions are being examined? What are the expected impacts?

    Structure How is the problem being influenced by (and/or

    impacting) the system? Science/Knowledge

    What do we know about the problem? What is causing it, and how?

  • PoliciesInvestment

    (e.g.,capitalinvestmentinREandEEforextracapacityandretrofits)

    Mandatesandtargets(e.g.,REandEEstandards,deforestation

    andreforestationtargets)

    Subsidies(e.g.,feedintariffsforenergy,taxrebates,paymentsforecosystem

    services)

    Scenarios Climatechange,energyprices,conflicts,peakoil,worldeconomicgrowth,etc.

    Structure

    Socialsectors Economicsectors Environmentalsectors

    PopulationEducation

    Infrastructure(e.g.transport)Employment

    Incomedistribution

    Production(GDP)Technology

    HouseholdsaccountsGovernmentaccounts

    Investment(publicandprivate)BalanceandfinancingGovernmentdebtBalanceofpaymentInternationaltrade

    LandallocationanduseWaterdemandandsupplyEnergydemandandsupply(bysectorandenergysource)GHGandotheremissions

    (sourcesandsinks)Footprint

    Society

    Economy Environment

    Whatsbehind

    the GreenEconomymodel?

  • Resourceefficiency

    Approach methodology

  • Whats behind the Green Economy model?

    The Green Economy Model should represent reality The modeling exercise should be tailored around

    a set of specific issues and a geographical context.

    As issues and local contexts are unique, integrated models need to be customized.

    Model the problem, not the whole the system Model = a simplification of reality System = collection of parts that interact with one

    another to function as a whole

  • Policy Context Challenges and Solutions

    1. Narrow focus cross-sectoral model

    2. Reports, little flexibility to test assumptions fast simulation, with user interface

    3. Research organizations have agendas objective structural representation

    4. Policy makers have agendas broad stakeholder involvement

  • Green Economy scenarios

  • Themodelingworkincludesbiophysicalandeconomic variables

    forhuman,economicandnaturalcapital,and

    canestimate:

    Avoidedcosts(e.g.,reducedfishlandingsfromover exploitationofmarineresourcesandcoralbleaching,and

    resultingavoidedemploymentlosses)

    Addedbenefits(e.g.,higherbiodiversityandproduction ofNTFP,ecotourismrevenuesandemploymentfrom

    forestconservation).

    Approach methodology

  • Resourceefficiency

    Approach methodology

  • pib

    investissement

    +

    emploi

    +

    stabilitepolitique

    climat desaffaires

    +

    +procedure administrative +

    legislation fiscale

    fiscalite

    +-

    +

    +

    education

    productivitede l'emploi+

    -+

    +

    terreagricole

    +changementclimatique

    securite+

    +

    -

    investissementadaptation climatique

    +productivite

    agricole

    + -

    population

    +

    +-

    espaceurbain

    +

    -

    foret-

    biodiversite

    +- -

    +

    Example: Madagascar

  • Example: Seychelles

    gdp

    tourismindustry

    fisheries

    ++

    average price pernight

    +

    occupancyrate-

    +

    state of the naturalenvironment +

    quality and cost ofhotel infrastructure

    quality ofservices

    ++

    cost ofoperation

    -

    construction+

    security

    +

    climatechange

    -

    planning andregulation

    -

    impact ofconstruction onthe environment -

    transportinfrastructure

    quality andavailability of public

    infrastructure+

    ++

    + touristarrivals

    +-

    social stability

    +

    +tourism industry

    revenues

    +

    +

    share of revenuessubject to

    domestic taxation

    +

    external economicperformance +

    indirectcontribution oftourism to gdp

    +

    +

    availability oflocal manpower

    other recurrentcosts

    cost ofservices

    +

    training

    availability oflocal quality

    training

    +

    +

    +reliance on

    foreign manpower

    -

    +-+

    salary of localemployees+

    quality of hrmanagement

    +

    +-

    productivity oflocal manpower

    +

    +

    +

    +

    +

    consumptionof inputs

    cost ofsupply

    ++

    +

    -

    technology

    consumption ofintermediate

    inputs

    +

    +

    -

    awarenessraising-

    -

    -ecotourismandentertainment

    +income

    consumption

    +

    +

    taxation

    -

    investment

    +-

    +

    savings

    +- -

    -

    +

    -

    ++

    employment

    + +

    -

    cost and accessto credit

    -

    +water,

    energy,land ...

    financialservices

    +

    +

    cost of operation- fisheries

    -

    fisheryrevenues

    +

    fishprice

    domesticfish catch

    -+

    turnaroundtime

    + fleet size

    workersproductivity

    ++

    +

    subsidy (tax removed)+

    internationalfish catch

    -

    licensing

    +

    +

    cost oflandings+

    +

    byproductsynergies

    +

  • The Modeling Process

    1. Definition of the problem (define the boundaries);

    2. Formulation of dynamic assumptions(causes and effects);

    3. Creation of a simulation model (stock and flows);

    4. Validation of the model5. Formulation and evaluation of policies

  • System thinking is a discipline for seeing wholes.

    It is a framework for seeing interrelationships rather than things, for seeing patterns of change rather than static 'snapshots'...

    Today systems thinking is needed more than ever because we are becoming overwhelmed

    by complexity.

    System Thinking (ST)

  • Examples of analysis results

  • Comparisonofscenariosforselected sectorsandactions

    Sector BAU Scenariosa Green Scenarios Agriculture: Yield increase

    Higher utilization of chemical fertilizers

    Expansion of conservation agriculture, using organic fertilizers, among others

    Energy:Expansion of power generating capacity

    Thermal generation (fossil fuels) Renewable energy power generation

    Fisheries: Increase production

    Expansion of the vessel fleet, pushing catch in the short term

    Reduction of the vessel fleet, investing in stock management to increase catch in the medium and longer term

    Forestry: Increase production Increase deforestation

    Curb deforestation and invest in reforestation (expanding planted forests)

    Water:Manage supply and demand

    Increase water supply through higher withdrawal

    Invest in water efficiency measures, water management (including ecosystem services) and desalination

    a Refers to BAU1 and BAU2 with additional investments allocated to match existing patterns.

  • Results: Growth and Sustainability

    Short term: Brown scenarios, then Green and BAU Higher growth fueled by resource extraction, cheap short term

    options -BAU-. Medium/long term: Green scenarios, then Brown and

    BAU. Higher growth driven by resource efficiency, which reduces

    costs and secures longer term availability of key production inputs for the future.

    Higher longer term resilience in Green scenarios; Clear cross sector synergies allow to reach a positive

    ROI for Green cases (3:1), higher than Brown in the medium and long term.

  • Results: in a nutshell (G2 vs. B2)

  • Results:GDPGrowth (CCrelatedcostsarenotincluded)

  • Results:EcologicalFootprint (2050values,footprintcomponentsrelativeto2010)

  • Results:NaturalResourceStocks andtheEconomy

  • Results:Fisheries(Fishstockrelativeto1970)

  • Results:Forestry

  • Results:Water

  • Results:CO2

    Emissions(relativetoBAU)

  • Employment Job creation in both Green and Brown cases,

    vs. BAU; In Green scenarios:

    Considerable gain in energy and other green sectors/investments (e.g. transport);

    Decline (vs. Brown), from resource conservation; Decline (vs. BAU), driven by overall social

    development and productivity increases, for macro sectors (e.g. services);

    Green investments have considerable potential for short term job creation and longer term resilience.

  • Results:EnergyEmployment

  • Summaryofthe economicanalysis

    Mountains- Investments: for

    reaching the stated expansion of organic farming land area.

    - Employment: additional employment is calculated for GE and BAU scenarios (assuming similar organic farming land expansion under BAU).

  • - Value added: calculated for different GE scenarios, compared to BAU (assuming similar organic farming land expansion under BAU).

    Cumulative net value added is calculated by subtracting investments and adding additional wages from new jobs.

    Summaryofthe economicanalysis

    Mountains(2)

  • Summary of the economic analysis -

    Energy- Investments: for reaching

    the stated RE and EE targets, and avoided investment in coal power generation (relative to BAU).

    - Avoided costs: savings on electricity consumption (due to EE) and coal use (due to EE and RE).

  • - Income creation: the employment generated leads to more income, and it can be considered an indirect benefit.

    The net investment required is therefore calculated using the capital expenditure (policy-driven), avoided costs, additional savings and income created.

    Summaryoftheeconomic analysis Energy(2)

    What is the Green Economy/Sustainable Consumption and Production?What is the gap (opportunity) for a Green Economy model?Whats behind the Green Economy/SCP model? 5 6Whats behind the Green Economy model?Policy Context Challenges and SolutionsGreen Economy scenarios 10 11Example: MadagascarExample: SeychellesThe Modeling ProcessSystem Thinking (ST)Examples of analysis results 17Results: Growth and SustainabilityResults: in a nutshell (G2 vs. B2) 20 21 22 23 24 25 26Employment 28 29 30Summary of the economic analysis - Energy 32