Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London...

24
Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London [email protected] w/ Mehita Iqani

Transcript of Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London...

Page 1: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

Quality after the Cuts?Dr. Anna Feigenbaum

Richmond the American International University in [email protected]

w/ Mehita Iqani

Page 2: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

What are your concerns about teaching quality in a post-cuts, tuition-hike HE climate? (In 140 characters or less)

#QAAcuts

Page 3: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

Quality Enhancement and Prospective Quality Assurance through

Teaching Exchange Workshops in Media and Communications

2010-2011

Anna Feigenbaum (Richmond University) Mehita Iqani (King’s College London)

Page 4: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

Why TE Workshops?

Problems with QE & QA approaches

Ways the Teaching Exchange (TE) can respond

- Quantitative - Retrospective- External standards- Top-down- Only looks at one element of

quality- Individual feedback to teachers

(surveys) - Focus on individual teachers- Can alienate new teachers - Only acknowledges academic

teaching

- Qualitative - Prospective- Internal standards- Bottom-up - Systematic approach to teaching as

part of institutional life- Collectively defined ‘feedback loops’- Focus on teaching in general - Inclusive of new teachers - Inclusive of a variety of types of

teaching experience, not only academic

Page 5: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

Overview of TE WorkshopsWORKSHOP PROGRAMME (summary)The half-day workshop is divided into two main sections. It runs for three hours, inclusive of a 15 minute tea and coffee break. Introduction (15 minutes) PART I: Insights Exchange (75 minutes) A panel presentation by members of the host department that provides insights into pedagogical challenges in our field. Break (15 minutes) Tea, coffee and biscuits. PART II: Teaching Practice Workshop (75 minutes)Participants take part in interactive exercises designed by educational professionals, focused on the student experience, classroom environment and how to work constructively with feedback.

Page 6: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.
Page 7: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

TE Workshop HostsInstitution Description No.

Participants

A Prestigious research led institution, teachingmultidisciplinary postgraduate programme.

7

B Teaching institution offering a variety of vocational and theory driven courses to primarily ‐undergraduates.

12

C Teaching institution offering a variety of vocational and theory driven courses to primarily ‐undergraduates.

7

D Prestigious research led institution, teachingmultidisciplinary postgraduate programme.

12

E Well respected research and teaching institution ‐teaching critical and applied media courses to both undergraduates and postgraduates.

5

Page 8: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

Findings from Workshops

Teaching Loads & Expectations

Marketisation of Degrees

Internationalisation

Page 9: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

Teaching Loads & Expectations

Page 10: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

2004 2005 2006 2007

France 17.8:1 17.3:1 17.0:1 16.6:1

Germany 12.7:1 12.2:1 12.4:1 12.1:1

Japan 11.0:1 11.0:1 10.8:1 10.6:1

UK 17.8:1 18.2:1 16.4:1 17.6:1

USA 15.8:1 15.7:1 15.1:1 15.1:1

OECD country mean

15.5:1 15.8:1 15.3:1 15.3:1

Based on full-time equivalents* All tertiary education: includes Type A 3+ year mainly theoretical degrees & advanced research programmes, and Type B shorter more practical coursesSource: OECD Education at a Glance, series, Table D2.2

21.5:1

Page 11: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

“The tip is all that we see of the student. All the other bits we can't get in touch with. For example, one day I was talking in class to a student from India who had been a national speedway champion. Our eyes lit up, none of us knew anything about him until then. Only through having a space for encounter could he and others see all that he could be. That's the bit that is the magic.”

“One of the major challenges is getting to know students. We teach best when we know students a bit better…it is now even harder as it’s difficult to get to know them.”

‘Tip of the Iceberg’

Page 12: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

“The more students we have, the more we will have to team teach, as it is a way to dilute the workload. It’s easy to parachute into a module when team teaching – but how can we work as an actual team?”

“There are so many methods in media and communications, that our methods modules is nearly always made of 16 different people teaching one method each, and the students don't get any overview of how the methods are used in different contexts to illuminate different things ...It’s a brutal way to teach – dropping in and teaching one method each.”

Increases in Team Teaching

Page 13: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

Marketisation of Degrees

Page 14: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

“Students have to see in an obvious way that their learning experience will help their career or getting where they want to be.”

“How can you fail someone who is paying £9,000 per year? … What if all of a sudden the courses that we teach cost three times as much, how will three times as much value be delivered? Should it be delivered?”

Degrees for Sale

Page 15: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

26%

Page 16: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

“Underlying the rhetoric of the theory/practice divide are the political realities of what is going in the HE sector at the moment, i.e., massive public sector cuts. The value of critical thinking is being downplayed by the system as a whole, as industry does not want graduates with questioning attitudes.”

“Our course is not vocational but some students seem determined to want it to be. This has been consistent across many institutions I’ve been part of. This seems particular to media studies (not necessarily other humanities disciplines like history).”

Vocationalisation

Page 17: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

Internationalisation

Page 18: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

“There is the difficulty of using international comparisons – rules, policies are very country specific so simple comparisons cannot exist. We need to do real research for real comparisons, but we are lacking time and resources.”

“Most of our issues relate to international elements across things and the numbers that we have, the sheer volume. Our department is a cash cow.”

Resourcing for Diversity

Page 19: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

“We can structure the postgraduate classroom [to] … force people from different cultures and genders to work with each other. There is always discomfort and tension at first. To help ease this you can point out their similarities. We can talk about ‘othering’ in a real context, create an environment in which students can have personal transformations. “

“Is there another way of thinking about how we model our teaching around diversity? Rather than including diverse needs and requirements of students, can we see diversity as a learning opportunity?”

Modelling Classrooms for Diversity

Page 20: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

Re-imagining Quality

Page 21: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

“Everything we teach is based on a programme specification that is measured against QAA and HEFCE achievements. With QAA coming in the next 24 months, we need to be able to track our module handbooks, which is what they will assess, which is why the university has a formula for them. But how much is this related to good teaching, rather than useful running of the university?”

Top-down QA & QE Controls

“Does the administrative dog wag the education tail?”

Page 22: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

Bottom-Up QA & QE Controls

Page 23: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

What are your concerns about teaching quality in a post-cuts, tuition-hike HE climate? (In 140 characters or less)

#QAAcuts

Page 24: Quality after the Cuts? Dr. Anna Feigenbaum Richmond the American International University in London anna.feigenbaum@richmond.ac.uk w/ Mehita Iqani.

Quality after the Cuts?Dr. Anna Feigenbaum

Richmond the American International University in [email protected]

w/ Dr. Mehita Iqani