QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400

8/3/2019 QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400

1/36

S# Date Location Surveillance Description Category SATIP SAIC DisciplineStanda

Catego

30111/11/2007

6:51:19 AM

6" DGA-1371,sht. 3 of 6, spool I to K is

3mm close to 3 number columns. A

violation to Aramco standard SAES-L-310

ara. 12.4. SP to verif for ossible

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-

01SAIC-L-2012 Mechanical SAES

30211/25/2007

5:17:42 PM

Pipes are used as support to another

pipes. The lines are: 1)DGA-1287,near

FB-07 col. 7 south. 2) DGA-1338 bet.

columns 7-8 & 9. 3) DGA-1413 8" bet.

col. 6 & 7 middle column. 4) DGA-1293

20" bet. col. 11 & 12 south. 5) DGA-1327

16" bet. col. 19 & 20 north bet. PR 15-15

and fin fan cooler. 6) DGA-1299 24" bet.

B65-C-102 and PR 15-16 and on the

su ort one rust cs bolt is touchin the

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


30311/27/2007

1:00:19 PM

Two installations that needs modification:

1) Pipe 2" CS, DGA-1482 spl. AI is

clashing with 1" SS pipe DGA-1459 spl. C.

Note: DGA-1482 not yet installed when

DGA-1459 was hydrotested. 2) 1" SSpipe DGA-1459 spl. B - is resting on

su orts without SS ad. SP to modif

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


30412/30/2007

7:09:19 AM

Remove fabricated reducer connected to

thermal oxidizer stack B65-F-104.

Violations to SAES-L-105, SAES-L-310,

SAES-L-101. Reducer to be installed shall

com l ASME B 16.9 ASTM A403

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


3051/23/2008

7:05:09 AM

Entire steam line header S-1781 has

been fully insulated prior to pressure

testing. This is a violation to SAES-L-150

ara 7.3. All oints shall be ex osed rior

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-A-004

02SAIC-A-2015 Mechanical SAES

3061/29/2008

7:55:30 AM

Contractor has pressure tested test pack

B65-2-TLTP-050 with lube oil as test

medium instead of demin water as per

approved test pack. Contractor shall

issue RFI for cleanin and de reasin the

Violation-After The

Fact

NA NA Mechanical Schedul

3074/14/2007

11:48:33 AM

Found, MAC Welding Machine with

overdue calibration (SN: 496R10031,

Model: Mega Arc 5040D, LAST

CALIBRATION: 27 Jun 2006) Schedule

for re-calibration ASAP Accom lish SAIC-

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-

011-01SAIC-W-2011 Mechanical SAES

3084/9/2008

7:18:25 PM

42" Valve 64-ZV-01 installed on piping #

42" P-1297 showed leakage from body

joint during the Hydro-testing of the

piping system Test Package # B68-2-

603. The valve shall be removed and

repaired in an approved valve shop. Field

hydro-testing shall be applied on the

valve prior to its installation in thes stem. Please confirm b test records

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-A-004


3097/24/2008

8:30:23 AM

Contractor GAMA has demobilized all its

welding, piping, and Mechanical

Inspectors with out following any

demobilization plan, prior to the

competion of construction activities

violating the requirement of Schedule-Q.

Problems are being faced to verify the

remaining construction activities such as

installation of PZV reinstatement of lines

Violation-After The

FactNA NA Mechanical Schedul

310

12/12/2007

11:02:16 AM

Contractor has proceeded for chemical

cleaning even though the hydrotesting

was not accepted by ID. It is SAPMT and

contractor responsibility to repeat the

test (for the small section that failed) orprovide the waiver as per last meeting

with PQM. Otherwise, the whole job will

be re ected and MCC will not be si ned

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-A-004

02 SAIC-A-2015 Mechanical SAES


2/36

3118/13/2008

2:48:06 PM

This is with reference Sales Gas

Compressor after cooler B68-E-102

A/B/C/D. Approved Drawings for 2 Vent

& Drain Nozzles of the Tube Bundles

show LWN flanges of 600# rating while

the Flanges installed are ASME B16.5,

300# rating. Vendor Nuovo Pignone has

provided the calculations and revised the

drawings supporting this change of

flange rating. It is advised that design

calculations submitted for 300# Flan es

Violation-After The

FactNA NA Mechanical SAES

3121/5/2008

7:26:03 AM

Surveillance conducted on B68-1 area

found out that during re-instatement the

contractor are using teer pull and come

along to align the two flanges. The piping

circuits are 48" with line no. P-1003 and

P-1007. Misalignment tolerance as per

SAES-L-350 was 2.4 mm and actual

dimension for misalignment is 100 mm.

Contractor are not requesting for any

inspection for flange alignment and

parallelism. The contractor was advisednot to force the line that will affect for

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


3131/19/2008

1:30:23 PM

Inspection of Strainers for the suction

piping of compressors B68-K101/102 has

shown that partially cut wires of the

screen, gas cutting/welding flux deposits

entrapped inside the corners of strainers.

These debris can get detached and enter

the compressors and cause damage to

the machine. It is advised that the

strainers installed on the suction piping

48" P-1029-3CS9P & 42" P-1297-6CS9P

shall be removed and inspected for

mentioned defeciencies to avoid any

damages to machine. The welds made

Violation-

Prevented

Installation

SATIP-L-350-


3144/10/2008

7:47:07 AM

FB-30 & FB-31 of piping 2" IA-1586-

3SD0P showed leaks during the

Pneumatic testing at 125 Psig test

pressure. The number of 2" diameter

stainless steel butt welds that leaked

during pressure testing is now 7 and the

recent leaks like previous welds are from

the edje of the weld. Although failure

analysis results are awaited from CSD we

should complete the necessary

investigation from our side.Welding

Records, Material certificates, welding

consumables certificates and fillers from

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-A-004


31512/4/2007

7:25:03 AM

Surveillance conducted and found out

damage face on check valve when

disconnected prior to hydro

test.Transverse scractch found caused by

weldin s atter. The contractor advised

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-

01SAIC-L-2014 Mechanical SAEP

3165/15/2007

6:33:44 PM

2x2- Seal drain lines buckled up to

approximately 7450mm (1st Riser)

elevation and a 3" flange detached from

its tack welds during the course of

rigging, mounting of the stack risers (1-

5 to its anchor bolts foundation.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-



3/36

3179/12/2007

9:36:42 AM

During the inspection for FAFCO record

for humidity and temp we found them

copy paste from last three days, because

they dont have instrument for that.

Snam. Should take immediately action

about the contractor and the C.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-H-100

01SAIC-H-2026 Mechanical SAES

318 9/11/20069:01:09 AM

Blasting garnet in the coating yard shall

not be stored on the ground. This does

not com l with SAES-H-100 ara.5.2.1

Violation-After TheFact

SATIP-H-10001

SAIC-H-2025 Mechanical SAES

3192/18/2007

6:58:25 PM

It has been observed that burried Pipe

lines crossing the fence with roads on

both side of it are placed on concrete

pedastals. This is in violation to SAES-L-

460 Para 10.2 and Standard Drawing AC-

036660 sheet 4. Concrete Pedastals can

cause dama e to the coatin which

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


320 5/27/20063:34:57 PM

While conducting Surveillance at pipe

rack no. 8 & 7 the GAMA are pulling 24"

double ended coated pipe and found out

that the paint are been damage not only

scratches but severe damage. The paint

crack and peeling-off not only top coatbut primer also. Its been observed that

the rollers are not fitted to used for

heavy pipes with coating ( Epoxy Paint )

The contractor advised to use another

type of roller like rubber or equivalent

Violation-After TheFact SATIP-L-350-01

SAIC-L-2012 Mechanical SAES

3214/18/2006

2:29:59 PM

4 double ended 36" pipes that already

cleared on RT are already delivered at

site with out cover at the end and already

have debris inside. Violation on Aramco

Standard SAES-L-350. The contractor

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


3226/30/2007

7:53:35 AM

Petrol Valve Gate Type 40" Diameter

150# showed a leakage from a through

defect from cast steel body of ASTM 350

CF8M material on application of testpressure of 425PSI specified for shell

testing. This faillure is not acceptable as

per the requirements of 04-SAMSS-048

Para 6.11 & 6.12 API-598 Para 3.9

Violation-After The

FactSATIP-L-108-


3235/15/2007

9:15:22 AM

Contractor is completing Flange Joint

with out implementing the flange Joint

Assembly procedures approved for the

project and the requirements of SAEP-

351. NO RFI is submitted for PID

violatin the re uirements of SATIP-L-

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


3244/3/2007

1:53:46 PM

er oroug nspec on, o o we ng

machines are in violation of Sch. Q

pertaining to calibration. See Sch. Q

attachment IV para. 6.1 therein specify "

calibration cycle of any equipment notcovered by standards shall not exceed 6

months. For GAMA: 9 each no calibration

stickers, 1 each cal. expired and 5 each

with 1 year calibration. For FAFCO: 8

each no calibration stickers and 4 each

calibration expired. We asked FAFCO

supervisor Mr. Jojo how the W. machines

are being used without calibration, he

replied calibration is not required for

welding structural supports and has been

agreed by Aramco 10 months ago,

FAFCO must produce copy of said

agreement. W. machines shall be

calibrated properly and shall have sixmonths calibration cycle. GAMA must

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-



4/36

3254/7/2007

5:42:09 PM

Snam Welding Inspector Mr.

Laksmananan Manikandan is currently

conducting inspection in main pipe rack

and he is si nin WDR. This is in violation

Violation-After The

FactNA NA Mechanical Schedul

3264/11/2007

8:54:22 AM

Pipe support sadle #SU-013 not in full

contact with the support/rack and do not

carr the load.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


3274/26/2007

4:09:42 PM

During the review of drawings for the

utility piping systems prior to hydro

testing it was observed that no Root

Valves are provided on the take off

connection from main header as per the

requirement of SAES-L-310 para 19.6.

Further the Contractor shall verify that

ALL the reqirements specified on section

19 of SAES-L-310 are com leted rior to

Violation-

Prevented

Installation

SATIP-L-350-


3286/27/2007

7:50:08 AM

No Flange end covers of 3 nos.

Masonellan MOV valves, 6" class 600,

dust is building up inside due to

continuous sand storm. A clear violation,

much more for this type of MOV valves.

See SAMMS-04-035 para. 12.2. Notethese valves was installed in line on FGH-

1131, but was removed due to the

flushing activities of the line, but it was

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-108-

01SAIC-L-2041 Mechanical SAMSS

3298/21/2007

6:58:34 AM

During water filling of line P-1049 it was

discovered that 36" valve S/N 50461, Tag

no. VS-GA-E-60144RF, SAECO tag. no.

4679 has leakage through pinhole on

bonnet, see 5 photos attached. It is

believed that it has been filled hyddro

tested by SAECO noting that it bears

SAECO tag number 4679. The incident

shall be investi ated b SP with

Violation-

Prevented

Installation

SATIP-L-108-


3309/9/2007

7:25:48 AM

Installed size of pipe branch P-1103 is 1"

and was based on old isometric dwg. no.BD-455411 dated May 2006. Whereas,

new revision no. "OA" of same drawing

and P&ID dwg. no. B72-ba-540838-002-

0F3 indicate that the pipe for branch P-

1103 shall be 2". Sp to verify and modify

the line. Note: Branch P-1103 is part of

test pack B72-014/3"-P-1035 which was

successfully passed the hydrotest on July

31, 2007 with RFI dated July 30, 2007.

Test pack B72-014 shall be re-

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-A-004-


331 10/25/200710:51:22 AM

Cut and reweld of joints FB26, SB29 at

K.O. 72-D-101 after it was successfully

hydrotested and accepted. The joints arepart of package no. B72-900B which was

hydrotested on Sept. 9, 2007. Re-

h drotest is re uired after modification


SATIP-L-350-01

SAIC-L-2013 Mechanical SAES

33210/28/2007

1:48:16 PM

Miss match of flanges not acceptable as

per standards SAES-L-350 at line BD-

1301, FB-16 & BD-1303, FB-01

connected to pump flanges B72-G-101B.

A violation to SAES-L-350 ara. 9.4.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-



5/36

33311/5/2007

7:36:22 AM

Original installation of branch B72-P-1103

was 1" based on old IFC ISO dwg. BD-

455411 sht. 1/2 dated May 24, 2006.

The subject branch was changed from 1"

to 2" on last week of October 2007 based

on latest revision of ISO dwg. The

concern branch was part of header 3" P-

1035 under package B72-014 which was

successfully hydrotested and accepted on

July 31, 2007. SP to conduct retesting

Violation-After The

FactNA NA Mechanical ScheduleQ

33411/13/2007

6:42:09 AM

During Reinstatement Inspection for TP

B72-072 conducted on 09 Nov 2007, PID

Inspector has found a wrong valve

installed on line 2" RL-2671, wherein the

installed valve was Globe Valve and

required valve should be Gate Valve.

There was no pretest punch, and the

installed valve is complete with the

correct gasket (yellow colored handle)

and bolts on final torque . GAMA and SP

ins ectors has missed this item but was

Violation-After The


3354/27/2006

4:21:25 PM

On the job surveillance at GAMA Shop it

was found out that one of the 36" pipe

that already fitted had been damage in

hauling which is acceptable but the worst

thing was the damage inside. It was

intentionally grinded with a 30mm x

50mm a rox. The i e is now re ected.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


3365/15/2007

6:56:07 PM

PMCP packages are submitted with out

any punch list from the contractor side

violating the requirements of GI-2.710

and ualit item of P I.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-A-004-


3379/29/2007

2:59:38 PM

Welding department of GAMA is

operating W/O an approved "Welding

Engineer" violating the requirements of

Schedule Q Attachment VI Para 2 &Table VI-2. GAMA has not provided any

replacement for the Welding Engineer

who was approved for the project and

left on emergency leave. Welding reject

rate is steadly rising and there is no

effective action from GAMA side to

control it. Root causes of weld failures

need to be analyzed and corrective &

Violation-After The


3384/4/2007

7:39:22 AM

e o n s rec y on op o g r er co

51) where support should be placed, this

is not allowed. To rectify the problem,

GAMA is to cut out the pipe 600 mm see

RFI 21682 at weld joint FB-74 near col.

52 without approve TQ/SI by Snamengineering. This is a violation of SCH.Q

para 1.3 & 1.4, quote 1.3 " contractor

shall be totally responsible for the quality

of work, quote 1.4 "in conformance with

all drawings". But it seems that GAMA is

carrying the rectification by themselves,

because the drawing used doesnt have

red line from Snam engineering attested

by PMT & PID through TQ/SI. Noting that

the rest of pipe will move after cutting,

so clearance must be secured first from

Snam engineering. Also, Snam welding

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-



6/36

3396/19/2007

6:26:48 AM

42" SS spool was installed on line # RL-

2639 without providing the bottom drain

line 2"-B72-BD-1359-ISD0P shown on the

drawing referenced above. Since the

materials of the drain attachment are

ASTM A312 TP 316L, welding works will

require back purging. Contractor shall

provide its technical expalanation (a

method statement) how the required

back purging can be achieved on the

installed piping. Also, contractor shall

submit RFI for verification of Pikotek

Violation-

Prevented

Installation

NA NA Mechanical Schedule

3405/2/2007

1:28:34 PM

Face of flanges damage (accross the

flange face) violation as per SAEP 351

para. 4.3 and SAES-L-109 para. 8.2. Also,

micro serration groove of four raise face

flanges have been removed by hand

power buffing tool, line HWS-2178

column 39 round level west side

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


3414/12/2006

9:25:39 AM

pes opera ng a ove , n opera on

90% of the time and covered by

Insulation are being coated with Coating

System APCS-17A CSD response for

above: Coating is not required for

insulated piping operating above 70 C

for the main reason of cathodic reversal.

At more than 80 C, zinc becomes the

cathode, and the carbon steel corrodes in

preference to zinc in the presence of

moisture, causing pits in the steel. The

moisture present could be introduced

during construction or by rain or

condensation during downtime. Hence

we recommend that application of APCS-

17A / Inorganic Zinc Primer shall be

Violation-

Prevented

Installation

SATIP-H-100


3424/7/2007

11:00:04 AM

Flange should not be painted, however

during Inspection of pipe spools for

release to site , it was noted that spool A

of B64 P1072 SB1 and spool AB of B64

P1002 SB 119 were painted. Should we

continue this ractice flan e face ma

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


3433/28/2007

11:39:53 AM

It was noted that storage for

prefabricated pipework was inconsistently

complying to the requirements of SAES L-

350 regarding the provision of end

protectors on pipes, weld bevels,socket

ends, and flanges. Any flanges that may

be dama ed durin handlin and

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


3444/24/2007

6:40:00 AM

During my witness of RFI for spool

release at the laydown area , the

following flanges with paint has catched

my attention. Extra precautions is

advised during paint removal , otherwise

any damages on flange face in the form

of deep scratches shall be rejected

durin installation works. SP Paint

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


3455/9/2007

11:11:24 AM

Witnessed during loading to truck of 36 "

dia stainless steel prefabricated pipework

that pipe ends has struck the f lange face

of the 36" dia RF flange which at that

time has no end protection. The flange

face was damage and was part of spool

BW BV of line 36" dia RLC-2769 under

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-



7/36

346

5/21/2007

5:57:39 PM

Visual inspection of 33 Nos. dummy pipe

support shows that the weld joint has no

root penetration. Since these supports

was prefabricated in Gama Fab shop in

Jubail , it was highlighted that there was

no visual inspection conducted on these

supports by Gama Welding Inspector. As

these supports arrived in HNRP-GTC , SPWelding inspector has accepted the

delivery with no comments not until

SAPID has brought into the attention of

Mr. Bijo (SP) to reject the support in

question. SP Welding inspector did not

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-

011-01 SAIC-W-2007 Mechanical SAES

347 4/16/200710:56:01 AM

e o owng s an ess s ee we ers

except G-021/G-023 who has only 26

mm thick qualifications have welded 33

mm thick P8 materials as follows: B65B

P1052 FB33/SB34 G-084/G027 B65B

P1052 FB24/SB25 G-084/G027 B65B

P1052 SB11 G-084/G027 B65A P1022

SB34/FB33 G-017/G021 B65A P1022

SB20/SB8 G-084/G027 B65A P1022

SB34/FB33 G-017/G021 B65A P1022 SB6

G-084/G027/G019 B65A P1022 FB25 G-

017/G021/G023 To clear this violations,

proposed solutions are as follows 1) Take

100 per cent RT on all joints involved. 2)

Grind 10 mm of weld metal and reweld

using other stainless welder. Welding


SATIP-W-011-01

SAIC-W-2005 Mechanical SAEP

3485/24/2007

1:37:10 PM

ocumen rev ew on e ers

performance for week ending 20 May

2007 have shown that the following

welders has continued production

welding without RT acceptance of their

first 3 joints. These welders were G-095,G-106,G-132,G-144,G-150,G-154,G-

180,G-193,G-196,G-207,G-223,G-230,

and G-239 and they have violated the

requirements of SAEP 323 par. 6.2.2

regarding acceptance of radiograph for

the first 3 joints before they will be

permitted to continue production

Violation-After The

FactNA NA Mechanical SAEP

3495/26/2007

9:53:19 AM

as mon ore e r arr va an

they arrived at 7:30 am , but

unfortunately on Mr. Suresh has come

out to his workplace and the the other

inspectors stay in the QC office.

Unfortunately SP Welding inspector is

also not present on fab shop and arrivedonly at 8:00 am. SAPID has made final

visual inspection at random and found

that 3 joints of 6" dia pipe were welded

using GTAW process and WPS GAMA 111-

002 applies only to 4" dia and below.

Moreover, 1 joint of weldolet has no root

penetration which violates SAES W-011

par.17.6.3.2. These were all attributed to

lack of welding inspectors wherein

welding works is ongoing. GAMA Welding

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-


350

was o serve an no e a w en

SAPID arrived in GAMA Fabrication shop

at 6:30 am there was no GAMA welding

inspector on shop No. 1 , 2 and outside

Violation-After The



8/36

3514/3/2007

10:57:33 AM

Document review for welders rejection

rate on a weekly basis have shown that

welders G-073 and G-082 has

accumulated rejection rate calculated on

a linear basis of 5.2 per cent (week

ending 25 March 07) and 13.3 per

cent(week ending 18 March 07). As

todate , welders were continously

welding despite violation as stated on

-

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-


3524/4/2007

7:24:49 AM

Observed and noted that the use of

oxygen analyzer was not enforced to

ensure that the back purge for stainless

steel has reduced the oxygen level below

0.5 per cent as stated in SAES W-011

par. 11.4.5 An increase in oxygen level in

back ur e ma romote root oxidation

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-


3534/7/2007

10:51:52 AM

Physical verification of calibration of

Welding machines in use in Fabrication

shop shows that Calibrations of Welding

Machines with tag No. LF 310119C and

LC 034583 were both expired on 25March 2007 and were calibrated on 29

March 2007 and 01 April 2007

respectively. Such practice is in violation

with the requirements of Schedule Q

Attachment IV. Moreover, SP Welding

Ins ector is not aware on the ex iration

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-011-01

SAIC-W-2011 Mechanical SAES

35410/3/2006

3:26:10 PM

It was observed at the inspection of

materials that contractor has modified

(36 Nos) raised face flanges by

machining the raised face to provide flat

face flanges for the riser spools of fire

water piping. How ever machining has

created a smooth finish on the flange

faces. Contractor is informed before

installation and welding of the referencedflanges that serrations need to be

provided on the flat face per the

re uirements of ASME B 16.5 Para

Violation-

Prevented

Installation

SATIP-L-350-


3553/31/2007

6:03:33 PM

The length and type of stud bolts

installed are incorrect. It is a violation as

per SAES-L-109 para. 12.1 and SAIC-L-

2014 section F. Stud bolts and nuts not in

accordance with SAES-L-109 must be

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


3564/19/2008

3:36:29 PM

Each Furnace Side Wall Panel has plenty

of Anchors by welding. After gritblasting,

immediately protection coat was applied

without conducting Hammer test for the

Anchors, so all Anchors should be

Hammer tested and check for any

welding stregnth/Anchors and damages

on the Anchors, because two Panels were

checked and at least three Anchors are

either became shorter or completely

removed for the weldin attachment.

Violation-After The

FactNA NA Mechanical Schedule

3572/3/2008

11:06:18 AM

The fabricated shoes were installed for

piping in GT #3 & Inlet Area without

copletion of the fillet weld on the side

plates with the Saddle from inside. The

fillet weld should be completed from

inside.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-



9/36

35811/9/2008

12:29:52 PM

1 1/2 drains are provided in eccentric

reducers ( 12x 8) for the following line

12-H48-DGA-6034-84-6SAOP which has

been covered by the test package GT6-

DGA-001 . It is in violation with the

requirments of para 12.3 of SAES-L-110.

It is a re eated violation . SINOPEC TRG

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


3599/24/2008

7:25:26 AM

It has been found the following in GT 5

of Area A . Welding a weldolet on a 4

piping spool( 4-H48-P-5103-33-C) which

had kept blinded on all openings and

filled completely with water. The root

pass of the weldolet has been completed

when the water level up to the groove of

the weld joint. It is a clear violation as

per para 11.2.1. of SAES W-011. All the

weld joints made on the piping spool

need to be Inspected by 100 % relevant

NDT to ensure that the weld joints , HAZ

zones are free from defects. Contractor

need to investigate further and takenecessary actions to avoid reoccurrence.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-


3606/11/2009

5:34:06 PM

Leakage is observed from the weep hole

of a 8"x1" lateral connection in the line

12"-H49-RL-5559-02-1CT2P covered by

the test package H49-DD5-RL-002. This

is located at EL+ 114179 , E 11451753 &

N 7497000. Leakage was occured during

pressurisation at about 400 psi while the

line required to be tested at 450 psi. TRG

is requested to investigate for the root

cause of the leakage and provide

necessary corrective action at the

earliest.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-A-004-


36111/24/2007

12:31:34 PM

During routine surveillance of quality

control records, found that TRG/Sinopec

are not utilizing quality control

attachments A, B, C & D. This is repeated

violation; refer to LBE-4483 of SAES-H-

100 Para 9.2.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-H-100


3623/30/2009

11:28:45 AM

During re-instatement the following has

been observed. Test pack # H46-IA-P-

10.3 (ISO H46-P-7022-31-3CT2P Item #

10 at M1) 6 spiral wound gasket AISI

316L/graphite installed 300 class in place

of 600class. This is violation against SAEP

351 4.1 and ISO drawing. Contractor is

advice to take corrective actionimmediately.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


3632/26/2008

8:00:31 AM

The length of the segmental wear Padis

300mm while the width of the I-Beams is

300mm. About 15 saddles were already

welded to the 20" pipe, 12 Beams are

with 300mm width and 3 Beams are with

280mm. There is zero tolerance for

expansion and this is violating Standard

Drwing (AD-036555)that the length of

the segmental wear Pad is 355mm

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-



10/36

3645/11/2008

5:38:17 PM

SAPID has witnessed Material Inspection

for Tie In H46-025 and H46-027 which

includes prefabricated slip blinds ,

gasket, bolts and nuts. During inspection,

it was identified that the bolts is A193 Gr.

B7M with nuts A194 Gr L7 againsts the

required A193 Gr B7 bolts and A194 Gr.

2H nuts. Material substitution may be

permitted if the same or higher grade.

A193 Gr B7M can be accepted but A194

Gr L7 is rejected to replace the required

nuts (A194 Gr. 2H)

Violation-

PreventedInstallation

SATIP-L-350-

01 SAIC-L-2008 Mechanical SAES

3655/14/2008

5:15:44 PM

Delivered prefabricated pipe spools at

Area B plant H46 were found lying on the

ground wherein ends of pipes, flanges,

weld bevels, threads, sockets were not

protected for possible damage and

accumulation of foreign materials inside .

This negligence on the part of theContractor violates the requirements of

SAES L-350 par 7.4 .Moreover, prior to

piping erection , all pipe spools shall be

internally cleaned by air blowing .

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


3665/25/2008

3:41:39 PM

A segmental wear Pad is missing for

Location #6 counting from east on the

Line (20"-H46-P-0112-63-6CT2P1)

feedin D-049

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


3675/25/2008

3:41:39 PM

A segmental wear Pad is missing for

Location #6 counting from east on the

Line (20"-H46-P-0112-63-6CT2P1)

feedin D-049

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


3688/12/2008

7:05:15 AM

On top of Air cooler H46-E-59 it isnoticed that, PZVs & gate valve are laying

horizontally mixed with debris/scarp

material, left uncovered since two days,

storage & handling of PZVs are not done

as per the requirements .This is violation

of SAES-L-350 Para 7 & 8 and 04-SAMSS-

035 Para12 also refer to lessen learn

sapd-096 Date: 6/18/2008. PZVs Photos

captured on site can be avail from PID if

required. Contractor corrective and

preventive action is requested. (21-PZV-

829A/B & Gate Valve)

Violation-

Prevented

Installation

SATIP-L-108-


3698/16/2008

5:47:52 PM

During surveillance of welding activitiesof socket joints in Area B-H46 (D006C),

found that no QC from TRG / Sinopec is

verifying axial gap 1.5 mm minimum ~ 3

mm maximum between male & female

components prior to welding. Found gap

either small or more than 6 mm. This is

repeated violation of SAES-L-110 Para

5.2.3 & SAIC-W-2037 Item B3. Corrective

Action: 1.Use SA check list.

2.TRG/Sinopec QC should make fit up

inspection and verify the axial gap prior

to welding. 3.Take 5 % RT to verify the

gap. 4.All socket joints not meeting the

requirements are cut and rewarded.5.RFI to be raised to verifying the gap

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-



11/36

3708/19/2008

4:45:53 PM

It is notice in Area - B that, many new

pikotek Spiral wound gaskets 24 &

above was place in horizontal, sloping

position in unsafe condition, & some are

hanging on the scaffold/hand rails at

workplace. Such method of

storage/handling has the potential todamage the gaskets while violating the

requirements SAEP-351 Para 4.1 Ensure

that spiral wound gaskets are stored flat

especially for large sizes, 24 inches and

larger. SAES-L-350 Para 8.1 all material

shall be handle with care during

fabrication and installation to prevent

damage. Contractors corrective &

preventive action is requested. Pictures

demonstrating the violation can be avail

from SAPID if necessary.

Violation-

Prevented

Installation

SATIP-L-350-


3718/23/2008

5:38:13 PM

For piping associated to H46-E-059

Stainless steel line # P-8056-31/32, P-

8057-31/32 & P-8033-31/32 Jointassembly of flange joint are done without

proper alignment of joints and bolting is

done by apply force while full Strain is on

bolts and equipment nozzle & piping

installation is first started from

equipment nozzles. This practice is

violation ASME B31.3 Para 335.1 (a)

joint assembly which introduces a

detrimental strain in equipment or piping

component is prohibited & (c) before

bolting up flange faces shall be aligned to

the design plane.Contractor QC vigilant

and corrective action is requested prior

hydrostatic test of line.

Violation-

Prevented

Installation

SATIP-L-350-


3728/27/2008

10:43:22 AM

It is noticed that, minimum distance

between 16 inch piping flange and

vertical structure is not maintained for

stainless steel line # H46-P-8056-32

spool-I, the flange touches with

structural column. This is violation to

SAES-L-310 Para 12.4 A minimum

clearance of 50 mm shall be provided for

inspection and freedom of pipe

movement between above ground piping

crossing with any structure (including

pipe support structure). Contactor

corrective action is requested prior to

Hydrotest of piping.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-



12/36

3739/2/2008

1:11:48 PM

Noticed that, for distortion of piping & to

bring it in alignment Contractor has

heated the pipe/fitting & force by

hammering and masked by buffing the

heated/effected area on Package H46-P-

028 (2 inch line # H46-P-7006-82 weld #

36,35 & 34), such practice has potentialof thermal cracking and effect on

material properties . This is the violation

of SAIC-W-2036 item # A7 Welds

requiring re-work by heating shall require

approval by CSD and SAES-W-011 Para

18.5 and Schedule Q Para 7

.3.5.Contactor corrective and preventive

action is requested for such repeated

violations.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-


3749/28/2008

10:45:45 AM

Noticed that, spool I of 42-H46-RL-7001-

01 is used to support other 24 inch pipe

(line # 24-H46-RL-7001-33). This is

violation to SAES-L-350 Para 11.2 unless

consult & approved by chairman of pipingstandards committee. Contractor action

is requested prior to perform welding

activity.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


37510/12/2008

5:12:34 PM

Noticed that, line # 24-H46-P-0110-

81(Package H46-P-005) was tested with

24inch valve item # 18 as test removed

(RT) now it is observed that 24 inch valve

is placed with unacceptable offset with

the pipe flanges and . This is the violation

of SAES-L-350 Para 8.1. Contractor is

requested to verify gasket seating area

for any damage utilizing SAIC-L-2014 and

avoid bolting the flanges by force without

proper alignment for all the valves to

installed in this package and any

modification / cut and re- welding need

Aramco approval.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


376

one end of the valve stick without any

gasket in-between which means there

have been valve & pipe flange strike

durin installation

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-


37710/16/2008

3:42:49 PM

36 Venturi 21-FE-102 Inlet area:

unacceptable imperfection (deep

scratches) on flange face is noticed, this

is the violation of SAEP-351 Para 4.3

The flange facing, particularly the

seating area, shall be visually examined

for cleanliness and ensure that no

damage, such as scratches exist and

also observe some of orifice flanges &

valves are store directly on concrete,

violation of SAES-L-350 Para 8.1 all

material shall be handle with care during

fabrication and installation to prevent

damage. Imperfection shall be repaired

with Aramco approved procedure

Contractors Corrective action and

verification through SAPID is requested

prior installation of venturi.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-



13/36

3781/16/2008

9:41:15 AM

In the Fabshop, more than 200joints

have been branch welded and so far

contractor didnt perform DPT on SS and

MPI on CS branch joints which is a

violation of SAES-W-011. Contractor is

recommended to perform NDT ( as per

the line class(10% or 100%) calls for) tothe above said branch connections with

intimation to Aramco Inspection.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-


3798/12/2008

7:01:33 AM

In inlet area facility it is noticed that,

shop welded joint Line number: H46-P-

8047-32 6CT2P 16 inch dia are cut and

re-welding/modification of joint in field

was in process without pre-welding &

joint fit-up inspection as required by

SATIP-W-011-01 item 3.6 & 3.7 and not

utilizing of SAIC-W-2036 and SAES-W-

011 Para 18.4 by Contractor is the

violation of Schedule Q attachment VI

Para 4A. Contractor corrective and

preventive action is requested.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-


380

3/29/2009

1:12:58 PM

During routine inspection visit, the

following has been observed. Electrodes

oven for drying and holding in area B

(Near SWS) is not properly controlled

and maintained as per the requirement.

There is no record of low hydrogen 5.1,

5.5 and stainless steel electrode drying

for two hours at 260-430, 370-430 and

120-250 degree Celsius respectively. All

electrodes E 8013, E 316 and E 309 are

kept in same oven and some electrodes E

309 and E 316L electrodes are kept both

together in same place. Too manycellulose electrodes E 6010 also kept

inside with E 7018 in oven which are not

require any storage and conditioning.

There is no record of electrodes returned

on an end of shift and re-conditioning of

these electrodes. Periodic checks of the

temperature achieved with each portable

oven are not carried out. These are all

violation against SAES-W-011 (6.1).

Contractor is advice to take corrective

action immediately.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-

011-01 SAIC-W-2032 Mechanical SAES

38111/20/2007

8:30:55 AM

During surveillance of Storage &exposure of filler wires- ER 70S-2,found

that filler wires are being stored in work

areas in open containers & in open

environment. These wires are getting

rust/ contamination, and which is one of

the root causes of root porosity and high

WWR. As per SAES-W-011, Attachment

2, which states all electrodes & wires,

shall be stored in sealed containers in dry

environment. Any wires that have visible

rusting or contamination shall not be

used and shall be discarded.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-



14/36

3828/19/2008

4:37:24 PM

Field Welding by SMAW process was

ongoing by unqualified welder T- 115 JCC

# 228, weld joint # 71 line number 24-

H46-P-0110-83. NPS of joint is 24

thickness 24.6mm were as welder is

qualified to weld for maximum thickness

11.5mm in SMAW and the weaving widthof the hot-pass by this welder was notice

15mm that violates WPS. Also no

identification marking for welder, fit up

check & WPS is notice adjacent to weld

joint. These are the violation to SAES-W-

011 Para 8.1 and Para 16.1 and violation

to SATIP-W-011-01. Contractors

corrective on action/examination and

preventive action is requested.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-


3833/9/2009

11:39:42 AM

During surveillance inspection visit in

Inlet area (Area B), Drawing no. 36-H46-

P-7000-6CT2P joint no. 36 cut being re-

welded by welder no.T-074 & T-034. The

following observed has been found 1) No

information was made to cut the joint 2)

Joint not having any traceably joint no,

line no, wps no. 3) Joint was not

inspected and 10mm high low measured

4) Preheating was not done as confirm

by welder 5) Welder was not having

welder ID 6) Welder was using cold

electrode 7) Electrode was used E-8013

C3 instead of E-7018 as per WPS- CS-

04A 8) This is absolutely violation

against SAES-W011, SAIC-W-2005 &

2006 and WPS. Contractor is advice to

take correction action immediately.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-


384No welding coverage from TRG and

Sinopec welding inspector

Violation-After The


3853/11/2009

1:02:18 PM

During walk through of test pack # H46-

IA-P-020, the weldolet joint # 9A found

lack of fusion at root (Drg.BB-250248-

023). This is violation against SAIC-W-

2007. Contractor is advice to repair

immediately and also require more

vi ilant for Visual ins ection.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-


38611/5/2008

4:25:58 PM

Noticed that, PWHT is not performed onwelds that required PWHT but Contractor

submitted false/corrupt record. Not

performing PWHT is violating SATIP-W-

011-01 item 3.14 requirement & such

practice is violation of Schedule Q

attachment VI Para 4A & IV Para 7.2.

Contractor corrective and preventive

action is requested with root cause

analysis. Weld numbers for such

concerns are 36-H46-P-7000-82 Field

welds # 96,100,102.24-H46-P-7046-31

Field welds # 1.24-H46-P-7047-31 Field

welds # 1.24-H46-P-7031-31 Field

welds # 1.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-



15/36

38710/12/2008

4:42:15 PM

Noticed that, 30- H46-P-7001-31 joint #

02 & 03 (30 inch heavy thickness pipe

26.97mm) were field welded and PWHT

activity is started without joint fitup, pre-

heat control, in-process welding, weld

visual inspection and no welder identifiedon joint. Joint number 02 shown as shop

weld in ISO drawing is welded in field

and other joints indicated as shop weld in

ISO are to be welded in field. Not

performing inspection by Contractor QC

is the Violation of not implementing

SATIP-W-011-01 item 3.6, 3.7& 3.9.

Contractor is requested to perform NDE

(RT) for above two welded joint

irrespective of line class NDE

requirement. Contractor is also requested

to perform welding inspection as per

SATIP in SWS & Thermal oxidizer areas.

Violation-

Prevented

Installation

SATIP-W-


3882/26/2008

10:12:51 AM

In area B, Contractor hasnt started

radiography, which now became a RT

backlog of more than 100joints, which is

a violation of SAEP-324, Para: 6.2.7 and

SAIC-W-2015. This condition shall affect

the trend analysis of weld rejection rate

and the early detection of non-

conforming welders and weld joints. So

the contractor is recommended to start

radiography as early as possible to

reduce the backlog and pull out bad

welders.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-

011-01SAIC-W-2015 Mechanical SAEP

3898/17/2008

2:02:29 PM

For Leakage noticed from HAZ of welded

joint # 2003 line BB250248-093 (HTPackage H46-IA-P-035) during HT

preparation, The weld joint is begin cut-

out in spite of proactive/request by

SAPID to investigate the root cause,

verify PMI, welding & NDE records/film

(as the weld joint was RT accepted) and

Aramco approval prior to proceed for

repair activity as per SA procedures/

Schedule Q Para 7.3.4 & 5 and utilizing

SATIP-W-011-01/SAIC-W-

2036.Contractors prompt corrective and

preventive action is requested .

Violation-After The


3908/19/2008

4:54:05 PM

Many weld joints in field are cut and re-weld/modification of joint in field are

performed without pre-welding & joint fit-

up inspection as required by SATIP-W-

011-01 item 3.6 & 3.7 and not utilizing of

SAIC-W-2036 and SAES-W-011 Para 18.4

by Contractor is the violation of Schedule

Q attachment VI Para 4A. (Example: H46-

SOW-7001-31 shop weld # 01, weld

joints of line H46-P-8031-33, H46-P-8045

32 & H46-SOW-7000-33 joint connecting

7001-31 line) Contractor corrective and

preventive action is requested for such

repeated violation.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-



16/36

3918/25/2008

5:50:30 PM

Noticed that,for distortion of piping and

in some case to bring joint assembly into

alignment Contractor is heating the

pipe/fitting and quenching by using flame

cutting torch and applying water on it to

cool, such practice has potential of

thermal cracking and effect on materialproperties. (Example of this practice line

# H46-SOW-7000-31, SOW-7003/4-33 in

Inlet area) this is the violation to SAES-W-

011 Para 18.5 and Schedule Q Para 7

.3.5. And such violation activity was

highlighted to TRG QC.Contactor

corrective and preventive action is

requested prior to Hydrotest of such

piping system.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-


3928/25/2008

5:50:38 PM

Noticed that,for distortion of piping and

in some case to bring joint assembly into

alignment Contractor is heating the

pipe/fitting and quenching by using flame

cutting torch and applying water on it tocool, such practice has potential of

thermal cracking and effect on material

properties. (Example of this practice line

# H46-SOW-7000-31, SOW-7003/4-33 in

Inlet area) this is the violation to SAES-W-

011 Para 18.5 and Schedule Q Para 7

.3.5. And such violation activity was

highlighted to TRG QC.Contactor


requested prior to Hydrotest of such

piping system.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-


3938/27/2008

10:38:42 AM

On stainless steel line # H46-P-8056-32

welds 39, 40, & 41 noticed that, for

distortion of piping and/or to bring joint

assembly into alignment Contractor has

heated the weld joints by using flame

cutting torch and applying water on it to

cool, such practice has potential of

thermal cracking and effect on material

properties. This is the violation of SAIC-W

2036 item # A7 Welds requiring re-work

by heating shall require approval by CSD

and SAES-W-011 Para 18.5 and Schedule

Q Para 7 .3.5.Contactor corrective and

preventive action is requested for such

repeated violations .( refer related

Surveillance Number: 12611, 13074 &

12867).

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-


3949/13/2008

1:23:52 PM

Noticed that on line # H46-SOW-7002-31

Orifice flange, Contractor heated the pipe

nipple/fitting by using flame cutting torch

and twisting to position it, such practice

has potential of thermal cracking and

effect on material properties. This is the

repeated violation to Schedule Q Para 7

.3.5 and refer to SAES-W-011 Para

18.5.Contactor corrective & preventive

action and TRG assessment to fine the

widespread of such problem is

requested.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-



17/36

39510/16/2008

4:15:24 PM

Notice that, many weld joints marked as

shop weld in IFC isometric are been

welded on site example of PID

observation are stainless steel 316L 4

line H46-VT-D049-44-6SD0Z weld #

123,138,122 & 134.also noticed

contractor is using supersededISO/documents and unavailability of

WPS, SATIP on the work site etc this is

violation of SAEP-1154, Para 5.4.2.3c

Provide correct versions of documents

at point of use and also Schedule-Q,

Para 3.7. Contractor is requested to

perform NDT on all such field welded

joints (marked as shop joints in ISO) as

per line class requirement. TRG QC

vigilance on such amendment welding

practice and providing applicable

document on work site and document

control is requested.

Violation-

Prevented

Installation

SATIP-W-


39610/29/2008

2:26:08 PM

During final review of TRG accepted weldsummary in HT Packages noticed that,

many weld joints cut and re-

weld/modification in field without pre-

welding & joint fit-up inspection and

mention as shop weld in weld summary.

These are the violation of SATIP-W-011-

01 item 3.6 & 3.7 and not utilizing of

SAIC-W-2036 and SAES-W-011 Para 18.4

by Contractor is the violation of Schedule

Q attachment VI Para 4A. (Example is HT

packages H46-S-001, H48-FG-02/03)

Contractor corrective and preventive

action is requested for such repeated

violation.

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-W-


39710/30/2008

3:05:55 PM

Repeated violations are noticed in field

Area B & C for not performing inspection

(welding activities) by Contractor QC

particularly for SATIP-W-011-01 item 3.6,

3.7, 3.9 & 3.17 (joint fitup up to weld

completion and verification of welder).

PID current observation are 24- H46-P-

7001-01 Rev B joint # 39 & start of

repair activity for 42- H46-P-8010-01

42inch Tie in flange (also No approved

repair procedure) and many many welds

cutout & modification in SWS area.

Contractor is requested for prompt

corrective and preventive action on suchrepeated violation.

Violation-

Prevented

InstallationNA NA Mechanical ScheduleQ


18/36

39811/6/2008

7:08:18 AM

Notice that, second time PWHT/heating

done in field for some shop welded &

heat treated joints probably for

alignment. This is the violation of SAES-

W-011 Para 13.10 & SAIC-W-2036 item

# A7 welding or heating after the final

PWHT is not permitted if the PWHT isrequired for service.. Weld numbers for

such concerns are 24-H46-P-7047-31

welds # 5.36-H46-P-7000-81 welds #

81.18-H46-P-7035-31 welds # 9.36-

H46-P-7000-01 welds # 56. Contractor


requested with root cause analysis.

Violation-After The

FactSATIP-W-011-01

SAIC-W-2036 Mechanical SAES

39911/6/2008

1:20:10 PM

During final review of TRG accepted weld

summary in HT Package H46-P-004

noticed that, many weld joints cut and re-

weld/modification in field without pre-

welding & joint fit-up inspection and

without PWHT, NDE (as applicable).

These are the violation of SATIP-W-011-

01 and not utilizing of SAIC-W-2036 and

SAES-W-011 Para 18.3 & 18.4 by

Contractor is the violation of Schedule Q

attachment VI Para 4A. (Example is 24-

H46-P-7031-31 welds # 4.18-H46-P-

7031-31 welds # 17, 18.16-H46-P-7047-

33 welds # 61 & 73.16-H46-P-7047-32

welds # 35, 46, 45, 27& 38.) Contractor


requested for such repeated violation.

Violation-

Prevented

Installation

SATIP-W-


40010/29/2007

4:18:53 PM

Generally, some branches connection

were made either without reducing Tee,weldolet or no reinforcement pad which

are violating Saudi Aramco Standard,

SEAS-L-110 , Paragraph 12.1.1 (Chart

1.). Some spools are listed below: 1).6-

H46-RL-3603-31-1CT2P-C (Two 2

Branches have no Reinfo. Pad) 2).8-H46-

S-3605-83-1CSIS-I (One 6 Branch has

no Reinfo. Pad) 3). 6-H46-W-3604-81-

1CS2P-E (One 6 Branch has no

Reinfo. Pad) 4).24-H48-DGA-5022-01-

1T9P1-MP (One 16 Branch as no

Reinfo. Pad) 5).3-H49-S-5169-02-1CS2S-

C (One 2 Branch has no Reinfo. Pad)

6).12-H49-RL-5559-02-1CT2P-F (One 6 Branch & one 8 Branch have no

Reinfo. Pad)

Violation-After The

Fact

SATIP-L-350-



19/36

Is it related

to Design

error

Is it

H, W, S

Areas of

Concern

Comments on the

LogbookComments on

Blank/Others

Yes SProcess

Piping

No SProcess

Piping

No SProcess

Piping

No WProcess

Piping

No H Hydrotest

No H Hydrotest

No W Welding

No H Hydrotest

No NA

NO QC

Personnal/Q

C tools /

organization

chart

No H Hydrotest


20/36

Yes NA

IFC/P&ID/Ve

ndor

/standard

Drawing

error/misma

tch/violation

No WProcess

Piping

No HProcess

Piping

No H Hydrotest Pneumatice Test

No WProcess

Piping

No HProcess

Piping


21/36

No H Coating

No W Coating

No H Coating

No SProcess

Piping

No HProcess

Piping

No W Valves

No WProcess

Piping

No W Welding


22/36

No W

NO QC

Personnal/Q

C tools /

or anization

No SProcess

Piping

No WProcess

Piping

No W Valves

No H Valves

No NA Hydrotest

No WProcess

Piping

No WProcess

Piping


23/36

No NA Hydrotest

No NA

IFC/P&ID/Ve

ndor

/standard

Drawing

error/misma

tch/violation

No SProcess

Piping

No H Hydrotest

No NA Schedule Q

No S Welding


24/36

No NA

IFC/P&ID/Ve

ndor

/standard

Drawing

error/misma

tch/violation

No WProcess

Piping

No H Coating

No WProcess

Piping

No SProcess

Piping

No WProcess

Piping

No SProcess

Piping


25/36

No W Welding

No W Welding

No W Welding

No W Welding

No NA

Personnal/Q

C tools /

organization


26/36

No W Welding

No S Welding

No W Welding

No WProcess

Piping

No WProcess

Piping

No S Others

No W Welding


27/36

No WProcess

Piping

No S Welding

No H Hydrotest

No H Coating

No WProcess

Piping

No WProcess

Piping


28/36

No WProcess

Piping

No SProcess

Piping

No WProcess

Piping

No WProcess

Piping

No W Valves

No W Welding


29/36

No WProcess

Piping

No WProcess

Piping

No SProcess

Piping


30/36

No H Welding

No SProcess

Piping

No WProcess

Piping

No WProcess

Piping

No WProcess

Piping


31/36

No W Welding

No H Welding

No W Welding

No W Welding


32/36

No S Welding

No S Welding

No S

NO QC

Personnal/Q

C tools /

organization

chart

No W Welding

No W Welding


33/36

No W Welding

No W Welding

No NA Schedule Q

No H Welding


34/36

No H WeldingSchedule Q para number not

matching.


matching.


matching.


matching.


35/36

No W Welding

No H Welding

No NA

NO QC

Personnal/Q

C tools /

organization

chart


36/36

No H Welding Schedule Q para number notmatching.

No H Welding

No WProcess

Piping

QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400

Documents

Transcript of QMIS LBE Rev Mech Updated 301 to 400